SWVA-Comprehensive-Regional-Wastewater-Study-2023

SWVA-Comprehensive-Regional-Wastewater-Study-2023

Document Date: Invalid date Document: SWVA-Comprehensive-Regional-Wastewater-Study-2023.pdf

OCR Scan (approximately)

This OCR scan may contain automatically generated text as generated using Apache Tika and Tesseract. It may not be correct. No effort has been made to correct any of these scans (so far). These OCR scans are also used in the site's Search feature. Please review the Search Policy for details about the site features. The OCR scan is provided here for reference purposes. It provides searchable text when the underlying document might not. But the scan process may not always work perfectly.

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA

COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL WASTEWATER STUDY

FEBRUARY 2023

Funding provided by:

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

Prepared for:

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission 1021 Terrace Drive Marion, Virginia 24354

LENOWISCO Planning District Commission 372 Technology Trail Lane Duffield, Virginia 24244

Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission 224 Clydesway Drive Lebanon, Virginia 24266

Prepared by:

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA

COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL WASTEWATER STUDY

Funding provided by: 4D) Virginia Department of Environmental Quality tog tn car

Prepared fot

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission 1021 Terrace Drive Marion, Virginia 24354

LENOWISCO Planning District Commission 372 Technology Trail Lane Duffield, Virginia 24244

Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission 224 Clydesway Drive Lebanon, Virginia 24266

Prepared by:

FEBRUARY 2023

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA

COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL WASTEWATER STUDY

FEBRUARY 2023

Seal and Signature Page

The Lane Group, Inc. 310 Valley Street, N.W.

Abingdon, Virginia 24210 (276)206-8571

Thompson & Litton 103 East Main Street Wise, Virginia 24293

(276)328-2161

Onsite Systems Engineering 9748 Coeburn Mountain Road

Wise, Virginia 24293 (276)328-5252

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL WASTEWATER STUDY

e The Lane Group, Inc. Thompson & Litton Onsite Systems Engineering 310 Valley Street, N.W. 103 East Main Street 9748 Coeburn Mountain Road Abingdon, Virginia 24210 Wise, Virginia 24293 Wise, Virginia 24293 (276)206-8571 (276)328-2161 (276)328-5252 a oe) ZN

$7 s— fl.

$9 W.M.skeen RS Lic. No. 0402008191

2 39 timoruva. MULLINS 3 $2 Lic. No. 28988

x Ly S Ctjten_ tl. Lau F CLIFTON W. CARSON % No.1940001010 | & 2-27-23 3 see soe

GONATHAN E. BROSKEY Lic, No. 046543

5%, February 27,2023 & %, S&

2, eS SIONAL NS

FEBRUARY 2023

Southwest Virginia Comprehensive Regional Wastewater Study

Table of Contents Section Page

1.0 Executive Summary 1

2.0 Introduction 3

2.1 Study Purpose and Scope 4

3.0 Challenges Faced by Far Southwest Virginia 4

3.1 Depressed Economy 4

3.2 Population Decline 4

3.3 Environmental Justice Issues 6

3.4 Aging Infrastructure 6

3.5 User Costs 7

3.6 Topographical/Soil Conditions/Rock Challenges 8

3.7 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators 8

3.8 Straight Piping 9

4.0 The Importance of Wastewater Collection and Treatment and Disposal Systems 9

4.1 Public Health 9

4.2 Recreation and Tourism 10

4.3 Future Economic Growth 10

4.4 303(d) Listed Impaired Waters 11

5.0 Existing Wastewater Systems Inventory 11

5.1 General Descriptions 12

5.1.1 Existing Collection Systems 12

5.1.2 Existing Treatment Facilities 12

5.1.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems 12

5.2 Overall Condition Assessment 13

5.2.1 Existing Collection Systems 13

5.2.2 Existing Treatment Facilities 17

5.2.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems 20

5.3 Identified Needs 21

5.3.1 Infiltration and Inflow 21

5.3.2 Existing Collection Systems 22

5.3.3 Existing Treatment Facilities 22

5.3.4 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems 22

5.3.5 Alternative Discharging Systems (Non-Municipal) 23

5.4 Cost Estimates for Improvement Needs 24

5.4.1 Existing Collection Systems 24

Section

1.0 2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Executive Summary Introduction,

Challenges Faced by Far Southwest Virginia

31 3.2 33 34 35 3.6 37 38

The Importance of Wastewater Collection and Treatment and Disposal Systems,

41 42 43 44

Existing Wastewater Systems Inventory,

5.2

5.4

Southwest Virginia Comprehensive Regional Wastewater Study Table of Contents

Study Purpose and Scope,

Depressed Economy

Population Decline,

Environmental Justice Issues,

Aging Infrastructure.

User Cost:

Topographical/Soil Conditions/Rock Challenges,

Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators,

Straight Piping

foe oe ie Ne ne

Public Health,

Recreation and Tourist

Future Economic Growth

303(d) Listed Impaired Waters

General Description: 5.1.1 Existing Collection Systems, . 2 2 2

5.1.2 Existing Treatment Faciltie: 5.1.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater System

Overall Condition Assessment, 13

5.2.1 Existing Collection Systems, . 13

5.2.2 Existing Treatment Facilities,

5.2.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems,

Identified Needs, 21

5.3.1 _ Infiltration and Inflow ,.

5.3.2 Existing Collection Systems, . 2

5.3.3 Existing Treatment Facilities,

5.3.4 Existing Onsite Wastewater System

5.3.5 Alternative Discharging Systems (Non-Municipal)…

Cost Estimates for Improvement Needs,

5.4.1 Existing Collection Systems, 24

5.4.2 Existing Treatment Facilities 24

5.4.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems 24

5.4.4 Present Worth / Inflation / Pandemic 24

6.0 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study 25

6.1 Study Purpose 25

6.2 Projects Identified and Realized / Successes 25

7.0 Evaluation of Unserved Areas in Need of Wastewater 27

7.1 Categorizing Proposed Projects by Type 27

7.1.1 Extensions of Existing Systems – Conventional 27

7.1.2 Development of New Conventional System 28

7.1.3 Development of New Decentralized Systems 28

7.1.3.1 Methodology for Preliminary Determination of Cost Effectiveness of Decentralized Managed Systems 28

7.1.3.2 Analysis of Ownership, Operation and Maintenance of Decentralized Wastewater Systems 29

7.2 Undeveloped Projects from 2005 Study 29

7.2.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District 30

7.2.2 LENOWISCO Planning District 31

7.2.3 Mount Rogers Planning District 32

7.3 New Projects Identified for Evaluation 33

7.3.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District 33

7.3.2 LENOWISCO Planning District 35

7.3.3 Mount Rogers Planning District 37

7.4 Project Prioritization 39

7.4.1 Scoring Criteria 39

7.4.2 Ranking Matrices 39

7.4.3 Decentralized Sewer Projects 41

7.4.4 Exist. Wastewater Collection Or Treatment System Upgrades Project 43

8.0 Meeting the Challenges 45

8.1 Regionalization 45

8.1.1 Decentralized Managed Wastewater Systems 45

8.2 Implementation of Proactive Policies 46

8.2.1 Mandatory Hook Up Ordinances 46

8.2.2 Regulatory Enforcement / DEQ Involvement 46

8.3 Funding 47

8.31 Decentralized Wastewater Systems 50

9.0 Educating the Public 50

10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 51

6.0

7.0 7a

8.0

9.0 10.0

5.4.2 Existing Treatment Facilities 24 5.4.3. Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems, 24

5.4.4 Present Worth / Inflation / Pandemic.

2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study. 6.1 Study Purpose.

6.2 Projects Identified and Realized / Successes,

Evaluation of Unserved Areas in Need of Wastewater. 2 Categorizing Proposed Projects by Type. 27 7.1.1 Extensions of Existing Systems ~ Conventional 2 7.1.2 Development of New Conventional System, 28 7.1.3. Development of New Decentralized Systems, 28

7.1.3.1 Methodology for Preliminary Determination of Cost Effectiveness of Decentralized Managed System:

7.1.3.2 Analysis of Ownership, Operation and Maintenance of Decentralized

Wastewater Systems. 29 7.2 Undeveloped Projects from 2005 Study, 29 7.2.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District, 30 7.2.2. LENOWISCO Planning District, 31 7.2.3 Mount Rogers Planning District, 32 7.3. New Projects Identified for Evaluation, 33 7.3.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District, 33 7.3.2 LENOWISCO Planning District, 38 7.3.3 Mount Rogers Planning District, 31

7.4 Project Prioritization.

7.4.1 Scoring Criteria 39 7.4.2. Ranking Matrices 39 7.4.3. Decentralized Sewer Projects, 4

7.4.4 Exist. Wastewater Collection Or Treatment System Upgrades Project…__.43

Meeting the Challenges. . 45, 8.1 Regionalization 45, 8.1.1 Decentralized Managed Wastewater Systems, 45, 8.2 Implementation of Proactive Policies, 48, 8.2.1 Mandatory Hook Up Ordinances, 46,

8.2.2 Regulatory Enforcement / DEQ Involvement, 83 Funding AZ.

8.31 Decentralized Wastewater Systems. Educating the Public 50 Conclusions and Recommendations…

Appendices

Appendix A – Existing System Information and Mapping

Appendix B – Potential New Wastewater Extension & Decentralized Sewer Projects

Appendix C – Potential Existing Wastewater System Upgrade Projects

Appendix D – Uniform Cost Estimating Support Data

Appendix E – VDH Health District Letters

Appendix F – VPDES General Permits

Appendix G – EPA Fact Sheets for Decentralized Wastewater

Appendix H – DEQ Virginia CWFAP Southwest Virginia Pilot Program

Appendix I – DEQ Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Information

Appendix J – Project Scoring Matrices

Appendices ‘Appendix A ~ Existing System Information and Mapping

‘Appendix B — Potential New Wastewater Extension & Decentralized Sewer Projects Appendix C — Potential Existing Wastewater System Upgrade Projects

‘Appendix D Uniform Cost Estimating Support Data

‘Appendix E-VDH Health District Letters

‘Appendix F - VPDES General Permits

‘Appendix G— EPA Fact Sheets for Decentralized Wastewater

Appendix H — DEQ Virginia CWFAP Southwest Virginia Pilot Program

‘Appendix | - DEQ Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Information

Appendix J - Project Scoring Matrices

1.0 Executive Summary

The development of public wastewater collection, treatment and disposal infrastructure is one of the most challenging issues facing local governments within the LENOWISCO, Cumberland Plateau and Mount Rogers Planning District Commissions. Issues common to all of the localities include limited service area boundaries due to existing system capacities, aging systems that are becoming inadequate to serve the current customer base and an inability to serve adjacent areas of potential growth and development. Many areas have clusters of housing that currently have no acceptable means of wastewater treatment. In fact, many households are currently discharging into inadequate septic systems or discharging directly into streams, affecting environmental quality as well as public health.

The presence of approved wastewater collection and treatment systems is essential for the enhancement of public health, protection of the environment, successful economic development initiatives, and an increase in new housing production. Some of the most common problems resulting from the lack of this vital infrastructure include, but are not limited to, the following:

▪ Numerous environmental and public health problems stemming from the illegal discharge of raw

sewage into surface waters and/or groundwater resources;

▪ Numerous environmental and public health problems arising from the use of failed, overstressed,

and/or poorly maintained on-site septic tank/drain field systems;

▪ An inability to accommodate new housing production due to shallow depths of soil to bedrock and/or

high groundwater conditions on potential building lots thereby preventing the approval of septic

tank/drainfield systems;

▪ The lack of public wastewater collection and treatment systems limits the ability of planners and local

officials to market Southwest Virginia to potential industrial prospects. Economic development

activities are underway throughout Southwest Virginia in an effort to attract new industries, create

jobs, and diversify the local economy. In many cases, the ability to market the region to a particular

industrial prospect is directly linked to the availability of public wastewater collection and treatment

services. Potential industries expect public wastewater collection and treatment to be available.

Moreover, the prospect of developing mass septic tank/drainfield systems to accommodate industrial

users is problematic due to costs and the resulting land area requirements.

▪ In some instances, building moratoriums are in effect for localities with existing wastewater collection

and/or treatment systems that are hydraulically overloaded due to the impacts of I/I or existing

average flows that exceed permitted capacities.

The sewer problems described in this Study affect many rural communities throughout the Commonwealth,

however, the needs are more dramatic in Southwest Virginia due, in part to the steep topography, unique

geology and several of the most bio-diverse rivers in the United States.

In 2005, The Southwest Regional Wastewater Study was completed, with its primary focus being to identify

and prioritize those areas within the Cumberland Plateau, LENOWISCO, and Mount Rogers Planning Districts

in need of sewer service. That 2005 Study prioritized and recommended fifty-nine (59) potential sewer

projects with a total estimated cost of $306,086,269.

1.0 Executive Summary

‘The presence of approved wastewater collection and treatment systems is essential for the enhancement of public health, protection of the environment, successful economic development initiatives, and an increase in new housing production. Some of the most common problems resulting from the lack of this vital infrastructure include, but are not limited to, the following:

= Numerous environmental and public health problems stemming from the illegal discharge of raw sewage into surface waters and/or groundwater resources;

= Numerous environmental and public health problems arising from the use of failed, overstressed, and/or poorly maintained on-site septic tank/drain field systems;

= Aninability to accommodate new housing production due to shallow depths of soil to bedrock and/or high groundwater conditions on potential building lots thereby preventing the approval of septic tank/drainfield systems;

= The lack of public wastewater collection and treatment systems limits the ability of planners and local officials to market Southwest Virginia to potential industrial prospects. Economic development activities are underway throughout Southwest Virginia in an effort to attract new industries, create jobs, and diversify the local economy. In many cases, the ability to market the region to a particular industrial prospect is directly linked to the availability of public wastewater collection and treatment services. Potential industries expect public wastewater collection and treatment to be available. Moreover, the prospect of developing mass septic tank/drainfield systems to accommodate industrial users is problematic due to costs and the resulting land area requirements.

= Insome instances, building moratoriums are in effect for localities with existing wastewater collection and/or treatment systems that are hydraulically overloaded due to the impacts of I/I or existing average flows that exceed permitted capacities.

The sewer problems described in this Study affect many rural communities throughout the Commonwealth, however, the needs are more dramatic in Southwest Virginia due, in part to the steep topography, unique geology and several of the most bio-diverse rivers in the United States.

In 2005, The Southwest Regional Wastewater Study was completed, with its primary focus being to identify and prioritize those areas within the Cumberland Plateau, LENOWISCO, and Mount Rogers Planning Districts in need of sewer service. That 2005 Study prioritized and recommended fifty-nine (59) potential sewer projects with a total estimated cost of $306,086,269.

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has provided funding to complete this Southwest Virginia

Comprehensive Regional Wastewater Study Report in order to:

a) Update the 2005 Study to quantify those needs which have been met and those areas which remain

uncompleted.

b) Inventory all existing public wastewater and collection systems within the Study area and identify those

systems’ needs.

Within the three PDC study areas, there were seventy-one (71) public wastewater collection systems

identified, operated by forty (40) sewer service providers, serving nearly 59,000 customers:

Planning District Estimated

of Sewer

Customers

Daily Gallons Treated 2021

Daily Gallons Billed 2021

Percent Accountable

Overflows in 2021

Cumberland Plateau 10,613 6,352,047 1,695,213 26.7% 28

Lenowisco 15,550 6,562,597 5,646,750 51.6% 35

Mount Rogers 32,801 16,438,142 8,210,421 46.5% 97

  Totals 58,964 29,352,786 15,552,384 44.5% 160

The percentage accountable is defined as the ratio of daily gallons billed to customers divided by the daily

gallons treated. An accountability of 44.5% for the study area is low, indicating that Inflow/Infiltration (I/I) is a

significant problem.

The existing sewer system customers within the study area were found to be paying very high sewer bills in an

area of the State having Median Household incomes less than half of the Virginia state average MHI:

Planning District Average Monthly User Cost – Based on 3,000 gallon Usage

2021 Median Household Income (MHI)

Sewer Bill as a Percentage of MHI

Cumberland Plateau $39.73 $34,276 1.43 %

LENOWISCO 46.30 32,231 1.61

Mount Rogers 36.55 45,055 1.00

Average $40.34 $39,701 1.30

There were eighty-one (81) VPDES permitted wastewater treatment plants identified within the study area,

forth-four (44) of which are considered to be public community WWTP’s:

Planning District

of VPDES

Discharges

Total Permitted Capacity, MGD

2021 Average Daily Discharge, MGD

Cumberland Plateau 31 19.946 10.297

LENOWISCO 20 14.832 7.357

Mount Rogers 30 22.199 10.444

  Totals 81 56.977 28.098

As part of this Study’s evaluations a total of ninety-six (96) Centralized Collection System, twenty-five (25)

Decentralized, and seventy-three (73) Existing System Upgrade projects were identified and prioritized:

Planning District Centralized Extensions

Decentralized Systems

Ex. System Upgrades

Cumberland Plateau $ 436,482,917 $ 28,637,600 $ 140,068,456

LENOWISCO 423,925,775 9,357,500 104,542,800

Mount Rogers 371,708,080 21,001,300 136,737,715

  Totals $1,232,116,772 $   58,996,400 $ 381,348,971

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has provided funding to complete this Southwest Virginia Comprehensive Regional Wastewater Study Report in order to:

a) Update the 2005 Study to quantify those needs which have been met and those areas which remain uncompleted.

b) Inventory all existing public wastewater and collection systems wit systems’ needs.

jn the Study area and identify those

Within the three PDC study areas, there were seventy-one (71) public wastewater collection systems identified, operated by forty (40) sewer service providers, serving nearly 59,000 customers:

‘The percentage accountable is defined as the ratio of daily gallons billed to customers divided by the daily gallons treated. An accountability of 44.5% for the study area is low, indicating that Inflow/Infiltration (I/I) is a significant problem.

The existing sewer system customers within the study area were found to be paying very high sewer bills in an area of the State having Median Household incomes less than half of the Virginia state average MHI:

Planning District ‘Average Monthly User Cost- | 2021 Median Sewer Bill as a Based on 3,000 gallon Usage | Household Income (MHI) | Percentage of MHI ‘Cumberland Plateau. $39.73 $34,276 1.43% LENOWISCO 46.30 32,231 161 Mount Rogers 36.55 45,055 1.00 ‘Average $40.34 $39,701 130

There were eighty-one (81) VPDES permitted wastewater treatment plants identified within the study area, forth-four (44) of which are considered to be public community WWTP’s:

Planning District #ofVPDES | Total Permitted | 2021 Average Daily Discharges | Capacity, MGD| Discharge, MGD Cumberland Plateau 31 19.946 10.297 LENOWISCO, 20 14.832 7.357 Mount Rogers 30 22.199 10.444 Totals 81 56.977 28.098

As part of this Study’s evaluations a total of ninety-six (96) Centralized Collection System, twenty-five (25) Decentralized, and seventy-three (73) Existing System Upgrade projects were identified and prioritized:

Planning District Centralized Decentralized Ex. System Extensions systems Upgrades

Cumberland Plateau | $ 436,482,917 $ 28,637,600 $ 140,068,456 LENOWISCO 423,925,775 9,357,500 | 104,542,800 Mount Rogers 371,708,080 21,001,300 136,737,715 Totals $1,232,116,772 $58,996,400 $ 381,348,971

2.0 Introduction

The planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of public wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure is one of the most fiscally challenging issues facing local governments within Southwest Virginia. Many communities have sewerage systems that are aged, perhaps beyond their useful life. These same communities are finding it increasingly more difficult to adequately serve their existing customer base, much less expand to serve adjacent unserved areas where growth, development, and water quality issues warrant public sewer service. Rural Southwest Virginia includes clusters of residential development that currently have no acceptable means of wastewater treatment. These built-up areas either discharge into inadequate on-site systems or discharge directly to surface waters. Whereas extensions of existing centralized systems (expansion of existing collection systems to serve areas that are currently not served by a public wastewater system), are often considered viable alternatives, topography, rural setting, capacity of existing systems, existing service area boundaries, socio-economic factors unique to Southwest Virginia, and availability of affordable funding, make it difficult to coordinate service to constituents outside of current service area boundaries.

The existing Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study was completed in 2005. Since then, a number of projects identified in the original study have been realized. However, this study is in need of revision, not only to identify and remove projects that have been partially or fully completed, but also to update feasibility, costs, and broadly identify needs of existing wastewater collection and treatment systems, particularly when considering expansion of centralized systems into areas where public wastewater collection and treatment is absent. An update to the Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study is also needed to serve as a road map for the future implementation of sewer projects in Southwest Virginia, just as the Virginia Coalfields Regional Water Study (VCRWS) did in 1998 for drinking water projects, and because the Coalfield Water Development Fund is proposing to implement a wastewater demonstration project similar to the drinking water demonstration project. An updated study will also serve as a basis for need and costs for current and future Clean Watersheds Needs Survey efforts required by the Environmental Protection Agency for the Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Program and for the upcoming Commonwealth Needs Assessment promulgated in 2021.

The Cumberland Plateau, LENOWISCO, and Mount Rogers Planning District Commissions (PDCs) received funding from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for the completion of a comprehensive regional wastewater study for Planning Districts One, Two, and Three. The PDCs procured the engineering team of The Lane Group, Inc. in association with Thompson & Litton and Onsite Systems Engineering to complete the Study.

Figure 2.1 – Virginia – Planning Districts

2.0 Introduction

Figure 2.1 - Virginia ~ Planning Districts

2.1 Study Purpose and Scope

The overall purpose of the Study is to develop a document to be utilized as a road map for the future implementation of sanitary sewer projects, both proposed new and existing systems and treatment facilities, in far Southwest Virginia. The Study will also serve as a basis for need and costs for current and future Clean Watersheds Needs Survey efforts required by the Environmental Protection Agency for the Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Program and for the upcoming Commonwealth Needs Assessment promulgated in 2021.

This Study includes an inventory of existing public wastewater collection and treatment systems, including mapping. This inventory includes permit numbers, approximate number of service connections, owners, general age, physical condition, design flow, service area map, persistent permit violations and/or overflow issues, hydraulic limitations, and needs, including any repair/upgrade recommendations, and opinions of probable cost for the construction of any identified improvements.

This Study also identifies new projects and unserved areas in need of wastewater treatment service and will include an analysis of the ownership, operation and maintenance of public wastewater collection and treatment systems, including conventional and decentralized managed systems. All proposed new projects are evaluated using a rating matrix and ranked in order of recommended implementation. Opinions of Probable Cost have also been developed for each proposed project. Additionally, the Study updates the data contained in the existing 2005 study, identifies funding sources and strategies for implementing recommended projects, and develops general recommendations regarding future regionalization, public education and collaboration, and system operation and maintenance.

3.0 Challenges Faced by Far Southwest Virginia

Providing and maintaining adequate sanitary sewer service is an enormous liability for any public entity. However, Southwest Virginia faces many unique challenges that compound the issues associated with sewer service. The following challenges must be recognized and addressed in order for this area of the Commonwealth to maintain, upgrade, and extend this essential service.

3.1 Depressed Economy

For decades until the early to mid-1990s, the coal industry was booming in Southwest Virginia. Small towns and coal camps were thriving throughout the region. This resulted in a population explosion and the development of the necessary infrastructure, including sanitary sewer, to serve the coal miners and their families.

According to the first report issued by the Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plant Communities, Southwest Virginia is the fourth most coal-dependent area in the United States. The federal group, which consists of 11 federal agencies and the Appalachian Regional Commission and was created by President Joe Biden by executive order in January 2021, issued the report in April 2021 - Federal group says Southwest Virginia is fourth most coal-dependent area in U.S. - Virginia Mercury

3.2 Declining Population

The decades long decline of the coal industry has had a devastating impact on the entire region. Table 3.2.1 illustrates some of the troubling trends for Southwest Virginia. According to the 2020 census data, every single county in far Southwest Virginia experienced a population decline over the past decade. The coalfield counties of Buchanan, Dickenson, Lee, Russell, Tazewell, and Wise all experienced double-digit percentage drops in population. The area’s median household incomes are also only 40%-70% of the state average.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/blog-va/federal-group-says-southwest-virginia-is-fourth-most-coal-dependent-area-in-u-s/ https://www.virginiamercury.com/blog-va/federal-group-says-southwest-virginia-is-fourth-most-coal-dependent-area-in-u-s/ 2.1 Study Purpose and Scope

3.0 Challenges Faced by Far Southwest Virginia

3.1 Depressed Economy

‘According to the first report issued by the Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plant Communities, Southwest Virginia is the fourth most coal-dependent area in the United States. The federal group, which consists of 11 federal agencies and the Appalachian Regional Commission and was created by President Joe Biden by executive order in January 2021, issued the report in April 2021 - Federal group says Southwest Virginia is fourth most coal-dependent area in U.S. Virginia Mercury

3.2 Decli

1g Populatic

The area’s infrastructure, particularly sanitary sewer systems and wastewater treatment plants, that was designed and constructed to serve and be maintained by much larger populations are now being operated and maintained by much fewer and increasingly economically challenged residents.

Table 3.2.1 – Socioeconomic Trends of Southwest Virginia Compared to the Rest of the Commonwealth
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census Results - www.census.gov

Cumberland Plateau PDC Total Population

Population Change 2010-2020

Population 65 years and older

Median Household Income

Buchanan County 20,355 -15.5% 23.1% $34,302

Dickenson County 14,124 -11.2% 23.0% $30,116

Russell County 25,781 -10.8% 22.5% $38,564

Tazewell County 40,429 -10.3% 23.1% $42,207

LENOWISCO PDC Total
Population

Population Change
2010-2020

Population 65 years and older

Median Household Income

City of Norton 3,687 -6.8% Unknown $30,518

Lee County 22,173 -13.3% 22.2% $35,006

Scott County 21,576 -6.9% 24.9% $41,540

Wise County 36,130 -12.8% 19.2% $41,285

Mount Rogers PDC Total
Population

Population Change
2010-2020

Population 65 years and older

Median Household Income

Bland County 6,270 -8.1% 23.6% $50,365

Carroll County 29,155 -3.0% 25.4% $44,518

City of Bristol 17,219 -3.5% 21.5% $39,679

City of Galax 6,720 -4.6% 20.3% $35,184

Grayson County 15,333 -1.3% 25.3% $41,558

Smyth County 29,800 -7.5% 22.6% $41,088

Washington County 53,935 -1.7% 23.6% $50,928

Wythe County 28,290 -3.2% 22.1% $51,639

Total
Population

Population Change
2010-2020

Population 65 years and older

Median Household Income

State of Virginia 8,631,393 7.9% 16.5% $76,398

http://www.census.gov/ The area’s infrastructure, particularly sanitary sewer systems and wastewater treatment plants, that was designed and constructed to serve and be maintained by much larger populations are now being operated and maintained by much fewer and increasingly economically challenged residents.

Table 3.2.1 - Socioeconomic Trends of Southwest Virginia Compared to the Rest of the Commonwealth Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census Results - www.census.gov

Buchanan County 20,355 -15.5% 23.1% $34,302 Dickenson County 14,124 “11.2% 23.0% $30,116 Russell County 25,781 10.8% 22.5% $38,564 Tazewell County 40,429 -10.3% 23.1% $42,207 City of Norton 3,687 6.8% Unknown: $30,518 Lee County 22,173 -13.3% 22.2% $35,006 Scott County 21,576 9% 24.9% $41,540 Wise County 36,130 “12.8% 19.2% $41,285 Bland County 6,270 8.1% 23.6% $50,365 Carroll County 29,155 -3.0% 25.4% $44,518 City of Bristol 17,219 “3.5% 21.5% $39,679 City of Galax 6,720 “4.6% 20.3% $35,184 Grayson County 15,333 “1.3% 25.3% $41,558 Smyth County 29,800 7.5% 22.6% $41,088 Washington County 53,935 “1.7% 23.6% $50,928 Wythe County 28,290 “3.2% 22.1% $51,639 State of Virginia 8,631,393 16.5% $76,398

3.3 Environmental Justice Issues

The primary aim of environmental justice is to ensure that each and every person benefits from equal degree of protection from environmental and health hazards. Environmental injustice happens when people are disproportionately impacted by environmental factors because of discrimination. Data gathered from the EPA EJScreen Mapping Tool (www.ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper) indicates that a majority of the localities in Southwest Virginia rank in the 80 - 100 percentile in a multitude of socioeconomic indicators and health disparities. This underscores the importance of the provision and proper maintenance of sanitary sewer systems that protect public health and the environment of Southwest Virginia.

3.4 Aging Infrastructure

A significant number of the sanitary sewer systems in Southwest Virginia were constructed in the mid- 1900s and are well over 70 years old. Many of these systems contain large portions of concrete and terracotta lines, masonry brick manholes, and antiquated pump stations. As sewer systems age and surpass their design life, they begin to quickly deteriorate (Figure 3.4.1). This results in collapsed lines (Figure 3.4.2), root intrusion, line blockages, increased infiltration and inflow, and decreased system capacity. The aging systems quickly fill with rainwater runoff during wet weather periods and sewer system overflows are common. Sewer lines are often buried deeply beneath town streets, sidewalks, and other structures. The existing lines are also frequently adjacent to other utilities including water, gas, stormwater, and power, making excavation for repairs dangerous and expensive. Aging wastewater treatment facilities and pump stations contain outdated components that are difficult and costly to maintain. As with any infrastructure, sewer systems become more difficult and expensive to maintain as they age. Many of the region’s systems are beyond rehabilitation and will require replacement. With each passing year, the cost of maintaining, rehabilitating, and replacing Southwest Virginia’s aging sewer systems will continue to increase exponentially.

There are many conventional onsite septic systems (COSS) in Southwest Virginia that are reaching the end of their useful life, which is generally considered to be 30 to 40 years. The lifespan is dependent upon how the system was designed and installed, how it has been used (or abused), and if it has been serviced and maintained on a regular basis. Another problem with the older septic systems is they were installed under much less stringent regulations than today, and before the current requirement of having a 50% reserve area for repairs in case of system failure. As a result, repairs or replacement systems are very expensive.

Figure 3.4.1 – Deteriorated Section of Concrete Sewer Line

http://www.ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper 3.3 Environmental Justice Issues

3.4 Aging Infrastructure

‘There are many conventional onsite septic systems (COSS) in Southwest Virginia that are reaching the end of their useful life, which is generally considered to be 30 to 40 years. The lifespan is dependent upon how the system was designed and installed, how it has been used (or abused), and if it has been serviced and maintained on a regular basis. Another problem with the older septic systems is they were installed under much less stringent regulations than today, and before the current requirement of having a 50% reserve area for repairs in case of system failure. As a result, repairs or replacement systems are very expensive.

Figure 3.4.1 — Deteriorated Section of Concrete Sewer Line

Figure 3.4.2 – Collapsed Section of Terracotta Sewer Line

3.5 User Costs

User costs are a direct correlation between the cost to operate and maintain the sewer system and the number of users billed for the use of the system. Because of the region’s declining population and aging infrastructure, most sewer system owners and operators in Southwest Virginia are faced with increasing costs and fewer customers to pay the bills. In addition, many of these customers earn well below the median household income in Virginia. Table 3.5.1 illustrates the average user cost in each of the three PDCs in far Southwest Virginia, based on information obtained for this study.

Table 3.5.1 Average User Cost

Planning District Average Monthly User Cost – Based on 3,000 gallon Usage

2021 Median Household Income (MHI)

Sewer Bill as a Percentage of MHI

Cumberland Plateau $39.73 $34,276 1.43 %

LENOWISCO 46.30 32,231 1.61

Mount Rogers 36.55 45,055 1.00

Average $40.34 $39,701 1.30

Appendix I provides information about DEQ’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund program. DEQ has established affordability criteria based upon the locality’s median household income (MHI), average sewer cost as a percentage of MHI, the locality’s unemployment rate, and population trends.

The 2021 Median Household Income for the State of Virginia was $80,963. All of far Southwest Virginia’s localities are well below the State’s MHI, most are less than half. Far Southwest Virginia has a declining population base and unemployment rates are typically higher than the State average. Using DEQ’s Affordability Criteria and an average MHI of $39,701, a reasonable sewer cost would be expected to be within the category of 0.75% of MHI – equivalent to $24.81/month. Currently, the average monthly residential sewer bill in the study area was found to be $40.34.

Figure 3.4.2 — Collapsed Section of Terracotta Sewer Line

3.5 User Costs

User costs are a direct correlation between the cost to operate and maintain the sewer system and the number of users billed for the use of the system. Because of the region’s declining population and aging infrastructure, most sewer system owners and operators in Southwest Virginia are faced with increasing costs and fewer customers to pay the bills. In addition, many of these customers earn well below the median household income in Virginia. Table 3.5.1 illustrates the average user cost in each of the three PDCS in far ‘Southwest Virginia, based on information obtained for this study.

Table 3.5.1 Average User Cost

Planning District ‘Average Monthly User Cost - | 2021 Median Sewer Bill as a Based on 3,000 gallon Usage | Household Income (MHI) | Percentage of MHI ‘Cumberland Plateau. $39.73 $34,276 1.43% LENOWISCO 46.30 32,231 161 Mount Rogers 36.55 45,055, 1.00 Average $40.34 $39,701 1.30

‘Appendix | provides information about DEQ’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund program. DEQhas established affordability criteria based upon the locality’s median household income (MHI), average sewer cost as a percentage of MHI, the locality’s unemployment rate, and population trends.

The 2021 Median Household Income for the State of Virginia was $80,963. All of far Southwest Virginia’s localities are well below the State’s MHI, most are less than half. Far Southwest Virginia has a declining population base and unemployment rates are typically higher than the State average. Using DEQ’s ‘Affordability Criteria and an average MHI of $39,701, a reasonable sewer cost would be expected to be within the category of 0.75% of MHI ~ equivalent to $24.81/month. Currently, the average monthly residential sewer bill in the study area was found to be $40.34.

3.6 Topography and Soil Conditions

Southwest Virginia is known for towering mountains and deep valleys. The topography that gives the region such beauty also presents unique challenges for the construction and maintenance of sewer systems. For gravity sewers to operate, minimum grades must be maintained and because of the region’s topography, this requires that many lines be constructed at significant depths. It is not uncommon in Southwest Virginia for sewer lines to be constructed over 15 feet in depth. This creates obvious issues with future maintenance.
Most sewer collection systems in the region also contain multiple pumping stations to overcome topographic challenges. These pump stations are often expensive to construct and maintain.

Soil conditions in Southwest Virginia also present unique challenges to the development of sewer systems.
Clayey soil is predominant in much of the region. Clay soil does not drain well and therefore is less than ideal for the construction of drip systems and septic systems that require percolation in order to function properly. Many locations in Southwest Virginia have significant issues with failing septic systems and are prevented from adding new septic systems because of these soil conditions.

Subsurface rock is also prevalent throughout the region. Rock excavation greatly increases the difficulty and the cost of sewer system construction. In addition, as with clay soil, the presence of subsurface rock can prevent the installation of decentralized systems and septic systems. Topographic and soil condition challenges alone can render a potential sewer extension project infeasible.

Physical features, landscape position, and soil characteristics all affect the ability of soil-based septic systems to treat and disperse sewage effluent. When selecting areas for placement of soil-based absorption systems, considerations include local hydrologic conditions, regional geology, and the physical properties of the soil being evaluated. Features that must be considered include soil depth, seasonal water table, topography/slope, drainage ways, fill material, rock outcrops, sink holes, flood plain, alluvial and colluvial deposits, shrink-swell soils, other soil restrictions, and free standing water. In the three planning districts, all of these features can prove problematic. In the more mountainous areas, shallow soil depth, rock outcroppings, steepness of slope, and shallow seasonal water tables are the main deterrents to siting soil- based systems. Valley floors underlain by limestone may contain sinkholes, shrink-swell soils, and rock outcroppings which must be avoided. In the coalfields, previously surfaced mined areas provide some of the best locations for residential and commercial development, but the presence of fill material prohibits the development of onsite septic systems.

3.7 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators

According to the EPA’s America’s Water Sector Workforce Initiative America’s Water Sector Workforce Initiative (epa.gov), “the nation is beginning to encounter critical and unprecedented staffing shortages in the water workforce that operates and maintains the country’s essential drinking water and wastewater infrastructure. The median age of wastewater treatment employees is 48 years and 30 to 50 percent of these workers will be eligible to retire within the next 5 to 10 years. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Brookings Institution reports both came to similar conclusions in 2018 and utility leaders across the country are echoing this concern.” The challenge of retaining existing and attracting new qualified operators is exacerbated in Southwest Virginia because of the socio-economic realities facing the region. In order to compete with the rest of Virginia for system operators, Southwest Virginia will need to offer competitive pay and benefits.

The onsite wastewater industry has the same operator shortage problems as the larger municipal wastewater systems. All VDH permitted alternative onsite sewage systems (AOSS), regardless of size and type, are required to have the treatment system operated and maintained by a licensed alternative onsite sewage system operator. Regular inspection visits to the system are required, along with sampling and reporting,

https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/americas_water_sector_workforce_initative_final.pdf https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/americas_water_sector_workforce_initative_final.pdf 3.6 Topography and Soil Conditions

‘Southwest Virginia is known for towering mountains and deep valleys. The topography that gives the region such beauty also presents unique challenges for the construction and maintenance of sewer systems. For gravity sewers to operate, minimum grades must be maintained and because of the region’s topography, this requires that many lines be constructed at significant depths. It is not uncommon in Southwest Virginia for sewer lines to be constructed over 15 feet in depth. This creates obvious issues with future maintenance. Most sewer collection systems in the region also contain multiple pumping stations to overcome topographic challenges. These pump stations are often expensive to construct and maintain

Soil conditions in Southwest Virginia also present unique challenges to the development of sewer systems. Clayey soil is predominant in much of the region. Clay soil does not drain well and therefore is less than ideal for the construction of drip systems and septic systems that require percolation in order to function properly. Many locations in Southwest Virginia have significant issues with failing septic systems and are prevented from adding new septic systems because of these soil conditions.

‘Subsurface rock is also prevalent throughout the region. Rock excavation greatly increases the difficulty and the cost of sewer system construction. In addition, as with clay soil, the presence of subsurface rock can prevent the installation of decentralized systems and septic systems. Topographic and soil condition challenges alone can render a potential sewer extension project infeasible.

3.7 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operators

‘According to the EPA’s America’s Water Sector Workforce Initiative America’s Water Sector Workforce Initiative (epa.gov), “the nation is beginning to encounter critical and unprecedented staffing shortages in the water workforce that operates and maintains the country’s essential drinking water and wastewater infrastructure. The median age of wastewater treatment employees is 48 years and 30 to 50 percent of these workers will be eligible to retire within the next 5 to 10 years. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Brookings Institution reports both came to similar conclusions in 2018 and utility leaders across the country are echoing this concern.” The challenge of retaining existing and attracting new qualified operators is exacerbated in Southwest Virginia because of the socio-economic realities facing the region. In order to compete with the rest of Virginia for system operators, Southwest Virginia will need to offer competitive pay and benefits.

depending on the system size and type. And all VDH single family discharging systems with a VPDES permit are required to have a licensed operator (Class IV or higher wastewater works operator or alternative onsite sewage system operator), to ensure that monitoring and maintenance is occurring. There are approximately 900 active DEQ General Permit VPDES discharges (1,000 GPD or less) in the three Planning Districts, and coupled with the lack of certified operators, the result is routine service and maintenance is being neglected on many of these small discharging systems. Concern has been expressed by the local health departments that homeowners do not have adequate access to licensed operators to properly operate and maintain their systems to comply with regulatory requirements.

3.8 Straight Piping

Straight piping is a type of sewage disposal that transports untreated or partially treated sewage directly to the ground surface or to a stream. It is not known how many straight pipe discharges there are in the three planning districts, as there has been no inventory or count made of them. They are more common in the coalfield counties due to topography and soil conditions, and in former coal camps due to very small house lots. Often they are not discovered until someone reports a problem or if the property is being sold. They are prohibited by the VDH Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations, and enforcement is achieved today by the power company denying electrical service unless an approved septic system permit has been issued. In years past, however, straight pipe systems were often seen as the only option by residents in unsewered rural areas due to the site challenges discussed above such as soil conditions, rock, and limited area, as well as the cost for installing an approved onsite treatment and disposal system.

4.0 The Importance of Wastewater Collection and Treatment and Disposal Systems

Essential for life, clean water is one of the most important natural resources on the planet. Wastewater contains many harmful substances and cannot be released back into the environment until it is treated. Thus, the importance of wastewater treatment is twofold: to restore the water supply and to protect people and animals from toxins. All communities need to ensure they have good wastewater treatment processes in place so that treated water can be safely returned to the water cycle.

4.1 Public Health

Untreated, the pathogens in wastewater can contaminate drinking water and crops, affecting human health. Untreated wastewater can also harm the health of animals, plants and birds that live in or near the water. Humans “catch” diseases from wastewater in a variety of ways. Pathogens in wastewater may be transmitted by direct contact with sewage, by eating food or drinking water contaminated with sewage, or through contact with human, animal, or insect carriers. Pathogens in wastewater include bacteria, viruses and parasites. Diseases caused by bacteria in wastewater include typhoid, dysentery, bacterial gastroenteritis, and cholera. Viruses in wastewater cause Hepatitis A, polio, and viral gastroenteritis, while parasites in wastewater cause giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis.

In cases of inadequate wastewater treatment, excessive amounts of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus sometimes invade water sources causing algae blooms. Algae blooms are dangerous to fish because they use a lot of the oxygen in the water. They can also have a strong, objectionable smell and can affect the taste of water.

Metals, such as cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc, can also be found in wastewater. Some of these metals are needed in trace amounts by our bodies but can be harmful in larger doses. Other potentially toxic substances can enter wastewater from various sources, such as local business, industry, or storm water runoff. These substances can include pesticides and chemicals like chlorinated hydrocarbons, phenol, PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), and benzene.

3.8 Straight Piping

Straight piping is a type of sewage disposal that transports untreated or partially treated sewage directly to the ground surface or toa stream. It is not known how many straight pipe discharges there are in the three planning districts, as there has been no inventory or count made of them. They are more common in the coalfield counties due to topography and soil conditions, and in former coal camps due to very small house lots. Often they are not discovered until someone reports a problem or if the property is being sold. They are prohibited by the VDH Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations, and enforcement is achieved today by the power company denying electrical service unless an approved septic system permit has been issued. In years past, however, straight pipe systems were often seen as the only option by residents in unsewered rural areas due to the site challenges discussed above such as soil conditions, rock, and limited area, as well as the cost for installing an approved onsite treatment and disposal system,

4.0 The Importance of Wastewater Collection and Treatment and Disposal Systems

Essential for life, clean water is one of the most important natural resources on the planet. Wastewater contains many harmful substances and cannot be released back into the environment untilitis treated. Thus, the importance of wastewater treatment is twofold: to restore the water supply and to protect people and animals from toxins. All communities need to ensure they have good wastewater treatment processes in place so that treated water can be safely returned to the water cycle.

4.1 Public Health

Ensuring proper wastewater treatment and disposal is as important for protecting community health as drinking water treatment, garbage collection, and immunization programs.

4.2 Recreation and Tourism

Recreational opportunities are a primary reason people choose to live by, or visit, the rivers and lakes of Southwest Virginia. The recreation demand is increasing every year and having clean water is a vital component to attracting visitors to our area.

Tourists use Southwest Virginia’s rivers, lakes, and streams for many different forms of recreation. Some recreational activities take place in or on the water, such as swimming, boating, fishing, and whitewater rafting. Other activities are enhanced by being close to water, such as hiking, nature viewing, and hunting waterfowl.

The good condition of these rivers, lakes and streams is vital to attracting tourism to the region, but many of these water bodies contain pathogens, as well as other biological and chemical contaminants. The presence of these contaminants determine whether people can enjoy recreational activities without risk to human health. People can be exposed to contaminants if they swim in contaminated waters or near storm water or sewage outfall pipes, especially after a rainfall event.

People can be exposed to contaminants through skin contact, by swallowing water, or through eating recreationally-caught fish. Effects can range from minor illnesses to potentially fatal diseases. Children, the elderly, and people with compromised immune systems are most at risk.

4.3 Future Economic Growth

The ability to grow the economy of Southwest Virginia is closely tied to wastewater. Without adequate wastewater capacity, and fully functioning collection and treatment systems in place, new businesses and industries won’t be able to move here, and existing businesses and industries will not be able to expand.
Southwest Virginia already has an excellent inventory of available land, good roads, and a robust electrical power and water infrastructure. But the key to attracting new industries and expanding existing, will be the ability and willingness to improve and extend the wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure to support new and expanding industries, businesses and residential development. It is important to note that…

• Properties that have public sewer available are far more attractive to economic development

prospects than areas without that infrastructure.

• Water and wastewater infrastructure are interwoven into every aspect of the US economy. Reliable

wastewater collection and treatment is an enabling force for economic growth and prosperity.

Unreliable and deteriorating infrastructure, on the other hand, will put the region’s communities and

economy at risk.

• Improved wastewater resources management boosts regional economic growth and contributes

greatly to poverty eradication.

• The economic benefits of improved water supply and – in particular – wastewater treatment, far

outweigh the investment costs.

• Investing in wastewater is good business – improved water resources management and improved

sanitation contributes significantly to increased production and productivity within economic sectors.

Ensuring proper wastewater treatment and disposal is as important for protecting community health as drinking water treatment, garbage collection, and immunization programs.

4.2 Recreation and Tourism

The good condition of these rivers, lakes and streams is vital to attracting tourism to the region, but many of these water bodies contain pathogens, as well as other biological and chemical contaminants. The presence of these contaminants determine whether people can enjoy recreational activities without risk to human health, People can be exposed to contaminants if they swim in contaminated waters or near storm water or sewage outfall pipes, especially after a rainfall event.

4.3. Future Economic Growth

Southwest Virginia already has an excellent inventory of available land, good roads, and a robust electrical power and water infrastructure. But the key to attracting new industries and expanding existing, will be the ability and willingness to improve and extend the wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure to support new and expanding industries, businesses and residential development. Itis important to note that.

‘* Properties that have public sewer available are far more attractive to economic development prospects than areas without that infrastructure.

Water and wastewater infrastructure are interwoven into every aspect of the US economy. Reliable wastewater collection and treatment is an enabling force for economic growth and prosperity. Unreliable and deteriorating infrastructure, on the other hand, will put the region’s communities and economy at risk

‘* Improved wastewater resources management boosts regional economic growth and contributes greatly to poverty eradication

‘* The economic benefits of improved water supply and — in particular — wastewater treatment, far outweigh the investment costs.

Investing in wastewater is good business ~ improved water resources management and improved sanitation contributes significantly to increased production and productivity within economic sectors.

4.4 303(d) Listed Impaired Waters

To meet US EPA requirements, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has to assess water quality monitoring data for Virginia’s surface waters every two years to determine if they contain pollutants at levels that exceed protective water quality standards. Water bodies and pollutants that exceed protective water quality standards are placed on the State’s 303(d) List. Placement of a water body and pollutant on the 303(d) List requires the development of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), a water quality improvement plan. In some cases, other regulatory programs will address the impairment instead of a TMDL, or the water quality may improve as a result of remedial actions or implementation of control measures. Each State is required to report on the condition of its surface water quality biennially to US EPA.

The six designated uses in Virginia against which water bodies are assessed include:

Aquatic Life Use: supports the propagation, growth, and protection of a balanced indigenous population of aquatic life which may be expected to inhabit a waterbody. In Chesapeake Bay waters (mainstem and tributaries), this use is divided into sub-uses that target specific aquatic life assemblages

Recreation Use: supports swimming, boating, and other water-contact recreational activities

Fish Consumption Use: supports game and marketable fish species that are safe for human health

Shellfishing Use: supports the propagation and marketability of shellfish (clams, oysters, and mussels)

Public Water Supply Use: supports safe drinking water

Wildlife Use: supports the propagation, growth, and protection of associated wildlife

As part of this Study, consideration was given to DEQ’s Impaired Waters listing with respect to identification of areas where failing sewer systems or lack of sewer service could be contributing factors.

5.0 Existing Wastewater Systems Inventory

The original 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study considered primarily new sewer service extensions and did not evaluate the condition of existing wastewater collection or treatment systems. The scope of work for this Study update included an assessment of all existing municipal wastewater systems within the three PDC study area.

4.4 — 303(d) Listed Impaired Waters

The six designated uses in Virginia against which water bodies are assessed include:

‘Aquatic Life Use: supports the propagation, growth, and protection of a balanced indigenous population of aquatic life which may be expected to inhabit a waterbody. In Chesapeake Bay waters (mainstem and tributaries), this use is divided into sub-uses that target specific aquatic life assemblages

Recreation Use: supports swimming, boating, and other water-contact recreational activities

Fish Consumption Use: supports game and marketable fish species that are safe for human health Shellfishing Use: supports the propagation and marketability of shellfish (clams, oysters, and mussels) Public Water Supply Use: supports safe drinking water

Wildlife Use: supports the propagation, growth, and protection of associated wildlife

‘As part of this Study, consideration was given to DEQYs Impaired Waters listing with respect to identification of areas where failing sewer systems or lack of sewer service could be contributing factors.

5.0 Existing Wastewater Systems Inventory

5.1 General Descriptions

5.1.1 Existing Collection Systems

Appendix A of this Study includes a description of all the municipal wastewater collection systems within the three PDC’s. Each sewer service provider was requested to provide information pertaining to the number of customers served and their makeup, gallons billed and treated during calendar year 2021, number of system overflows reported during calendar year 2021, and other relevant data. System mapping is also provided for each collection system. Over seventy (70) municipal sewage collection systems identified within the three PDC study area.

5.1.2 Existing Treatment Facilities

Appendix A of this Study also includes a description of all the municipal wastewater treatment plants within the three PDC’s. As part of the Study evaluation, DEQ was requested to provide the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR’s) for each of the facilities for all of calendar year 2021. A total of eighty-one (81) facilities have VPDES permitted discharges within the study area, forty-four (44) of which are public community WWTPs.

5.1.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems

There are three classifications of onsite wastewater systems that are regulated by the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) and/or the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). These are described as follows:

Conventional Onsite Sewage System (COSS) – These are defined by VDH as a treatment works system consisting of one or more septic tanks with the effluent conveyed by gravity, pump, or siphon to a gravity distributed subsurface soil absorption drainfield, consisting of one or multiple trenches.
Alternative Onsite Sewage System (AOSS) – These are defined by VDH as any treatment works system that is not a conventional onsite sewage system and which does not result in a point source discharge. There are many types of alternative treatment systems, including aerobic treatment units, single pass or recirculating media filters (using various types of filter media), constructed wetlands, and others. There also are alternative disposal systems including pads or mounds, low pressure distribution, drip dispersal, and spray irrigation.

The approximate number of permitted alternative onsite systems in the three planning districts provided by the Health District offices were:

Cumberland Plateau = 100 Lenowisco = 135 Mt. Rogers = Number not Provided

DEQ General Permit Discharges – These are treatment systems that provide secondary (TL-2) or advanced (TL-3) wastewater treatment, along with disinfection, prior to discharging the effluent to a surface stream or to a dry ditch. These are permitted by DEQ under the VPDES General Permit program, which is for discharges less than or equal to 1000 GPD. DEQ and VDH issue a combined permit if the system is for a single family residence, and it is a DEQ regulated permit if it is for any other type of discharge, i.e. multi-family, church, commercial establishment, etc.

There are approximately 900 VPDES General Permits in the three Planning Districts, as follows:

Cumberland Plateau = 503
Lenowisco = 304 Mt. Rogers = 91

A complete list of VPDES General Permits in the three planning districts is included in Appendix F.

5.1 General Descriptions 5.1.1 _ Existing Collection Systems

Appendix A of this Study includes a description of all the municipal wastewater collection systems within the three POC’s. Each sewer service provider was requested to provide information pertaining to the number of customers served and their makeup, gallons billed and treated during calendar year 2021, number of system overflows reported during calendar year 2021, and other relevant data. System mapping is also provided for each collection system. Over seventy (70) municipal sewage collection systems identified within the three PDC study area.

5.1.2 Existing Treatment Facilities

5.1.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems

‘There are three classifications of onsite wastewater systems that are regulated by the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) and/or the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). These are described as follows:

Conventional Onsite Sewage System (COSS) ~ These are defined by VDH as a treatment works system

consisting of one or more septic tanks with the effluent conveyed by gravity, pump, or siphon to a gravity distributed subsurface soil absorption drainfield, consisting of one or multiple trenches.

Alternative Onsite Sewage System (AOS) ~ These are defined by VDH as any treatment works system, that is not a conventional onsite sewage system and which does not result in a point source discharge. There are many types of alternative treatment systems, including aerobic treatment units, single pass or recirculating media filters (using various types of filter media), constructed wetlands, and others. There also are alternative disposal systems including pads or mounds, low pressure distribution, drip dispersal, and spray irrigation.

The approximate number of permitted alternative onsite systems in the three planning districts provided by the Health District offices were:

Cumberland Plateau = 100

Lenowisco = 135

Mt. Rogers = Number not Provided

DEQ General Permit Discharges - These are treatment systems that provide secondary (TL-2) or advanced (TL-3) wastewater treatment, along with disinfection, prior to discharging the effluent to a surface stream or to a dry ditch. These are permitted by DEQ under the VPDES General Permit program, which is for discharges less than or equal to 1000 GPD. DEQ and VDH issue a combined permit if the system is for a single family residence, and it is a DEQ. regulated permit f itis for any other type of discharge, i.e. multi-family, church, commercial establishment, etc.

There are approximately 900 VPDES General Permits in the three Planning Districts, as follows: Cumberland Plateau = 503 Lenowisco = 304 Mt. Rogers = 91

‘A complete list of VPDES General Permits in the three planning districts is included in Appendix F.

5.2 Overall Condition Assessment

5.2.1 Existing Collection Systems

Each wastewater utility within the three PDC study area was requested to provide a breakdown of the number and type of customers served by each system as well as volume of wastewater treated and billed for each month during calendar year 2021. A majority of the systems provided all of the requested information, but some did not. A summary table of the findings is presented as follows:

Planning District Estimated

of Sewer

Customers

Daily Gallons Treated 2021

Daily Gallons Billed 2021

Percent Accountable

Overflows in 2021

Cumberland Plateau 10,613 6,352,047 1,695,213 26.7% 28

Lenowisco 15,550 6,562,597 5,646,750 51.6% 35

Mount Rogers 32,801 16,438,142 8,210,421 46.5% 97

Totals 58,964 29,352,786 15,552,384 44.5% 160

Collectively within the study area, there were found to be about seventy-one (71) existing collection systems operated by forty (40) public sewer service providers with a total of 58,964 customers. Within each of the three PDC’s, sewer system accountability was found to be a widespread problem. Accountability is defined to be the percentage of gallons billed to customers divided by the gallons treated. As a whole, the study area’s sewer systems had an average accountability of about 44.5%. The unaccounted flow is largely comprised of inflow and infiltration (I/I).

Summary information for those systems that provided an information response is provided for each Planning District. For the collection systems, Primary systems are those collection systems which also have a WWTP. Secondary systems are those which collect wastewater but convey to another system for treatment.

5.2 Overall Condition Assessment 5.2.1 _ Existing Collection Systems

‘Summary information for those systems that provided an information response is provided for each Planning District. For the collection systems, Primary systems are those collection systems which also have a WWTP, Secondary systems are those which collect wastewater but convey to another system for treatment.

Within the Cumberland Plateau PDC, there are thirteen (13) sewer systems operated by ten (10) public sewer service providers. A summary of data provided by those systems follows:

Dickenson

Legend

I County Town/City — Gravity Main Force Main @ wwe

Within the Lenowisco PDC, there are twenty-nine (29) sewer systems operated by fourteen (14) public sewer service providers. A summary of data provided by those systems follows:

Legend

County Town/City — Gravity Main w+ Force Main @ wwe

Within the Mount Rogers PDC, there are twenty-nine (29) sewer systems operated by sixteen (16) public sewer service providers. A summary of data provided by those systems follows:

Legend

I County i town/city —— Gravity Main

= Force Main @ ww

The data indicates that the sum total of all collection systems includes a significant amount of unaccountable wastewater being collected and treated. For the Study area as a whole, the average daily volume of wastewater being treated in 2021 was about 29.4 MGD with an average daily billing volume of about 15.5 MGD, or only about 44.5 % accountable.

5.2.2 Existing Treatment Facilities

Within the three PDC study areas, there are a total of eighty-one (81) VPDES permitted WWTP discharges:

Planning District

of VPDES

Discharges

Total Permitted Capacity, MGD

2021 Average Daily Discharge, MGD

Cumberland Plateau 31 19.946 10.297

LENOWISCO 20 14.832 7.357

Mount Rogers 30 22.199 10.444

  Totals 81 56.977 28.098

Of those systems, forty-four (44) of the facilities are considered to be public community WWTPs. The balance would be for smaller treatment plants serving individual schools, campgrounds, and other facilities. Collectively for the combined study area, the WWTPs operated at about 49.3% of their permitted discharge capacity during calendar year 2021.

As part of the Study, DEQ was requested to provide Discharge Monitoring Records (DMRs) for all of the permitted VPDES discharges for the entire calendar year 2021. Summary information is provided for all of those WWTPs within each Planning District.

The data indicates that the sum total of all collection systems includes a significant amount of unaccountable wastewater being collected and treated. For the Study area as a whole, the average daily volume of ‘wastewater being treated in 2021 was about 29.4 MGD with an average daily billing volume of about 15.5 MGD, or only about 44.5 % accountable.

5.2.2 Exi

ing Treatment Facilities

Within the three PDC study areas, there are a total of eighty-one (81) VPDES permitted WWTP discharges:

#ofVPDES | Total Permitted | 2021 Average Daily

Planning District, anning Distr Discharges | Capacity, MGD| Discharge, MGD

Cumberland Plateau 31 19.946 10.297 LENOWISCO 20 14.832 7.357 Mount Rogers 30 22.199 10.444

Totals 81 56.977 28.098

Of those systems, forty-four (44) of the facilities are considered to be public community WWTPS. The balance would be for smaller treatment plants serving individual schools, campgrounds, and other facilities. Collectively for the combined study area, the WWTPs operated at about 49.3% of their permitted discharge capacity during calendar year 2021.

As part of the Study, DEQ was requested to provide Discharge Monitoring Records (DMRs) for all of the

permitted VPDES discharges for the entire calendar year 2021. Summary information is provided for all of those WWTPs within each Planning District.

There are thirty-one (31) active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges within the Cumberland Plateau Planning District, fifteen (15) of which are public community WWTPs:

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION PERMITTED WWTP DISCHARGE SUMMARIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021

Facility Permit No.

Permitted Flow

Capacity, MGD

Average Daily

Flow for 2021, MGD

Maximum Daily

Flow for 2021, MGD

Highest 3- Consecutive Month Avg. Flow, MGD

Buchanan Cnty PSA - Conaway WWTP VA0090531 2.000 1.667 2.350 2.033 Buchanan Cnty PSA - Council Industrial Park STP VA0087254 0.017 0.001 0.001 0.001 Buchanan Cnty PSA - Deskins STP VA0090239 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 Buchanan Cnty Public Schools - Hurley High School VA0026972 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.007 Buchanan Cnty Public Schools - Twin Valley H S STP VA0068438 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003 Buchanan Cnty Public Schools-Hurley Middle School VA0067521 0.017 0.004 0.004 0.006 Breaks Interstate Park VA0060275 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 Breaks Interstate Park Camp 1 STP VA0023892 0.060 0.010 0.034 0.010 Camp Jacob Incorporated STP VA0086274 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clintwood WWTP VA0026565 0.495 0.153 0.449 0.238 Dickenson Cnty Public Schools - Ervinton E S STP VA0027421 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.001 Dickenson Cnty Public Schools - Sandlick E S STP VA0027464 0.010 0.001 0.001 0.003 Dickenson County Public Service Auth - Haysi STP VA0067571 0.200 0.196 0.329 0.231 Dickenson County Public Service Authority STP 1 VA0082589 0.020 0.004 0.006 0.005 Dickenson Russell Contura - McClure River Prep Plt VA0067032 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.003 Paramont Contura LLC - Deep Mine 41 VA0092576 0.015 0.009 0.009 0.009 Paramont Contura LLC -Deep Mine 44 STP VA0092878 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.001 Ridgeview High and Middle School VA0092681 0.035 0.000 0.000 0.000 Buchanan Cnty Public Schools - Council Elem & HS VA0064751 0.023 0.003 0.003 0.005 Cleveland STP VA0021016 0.039 0.040 0.137 0.063 Dante Community WWTP VA0088935 0.125 0.032 0.127 0.068 DOC - Appalachian Comm Corr Alternative Prog VA0020672 0.021 0.005 0.007 0.006 Honaker STP VA0026387 0.400 0.113 0.189 0.152 Lebanon WWTP VA0020745 0.999 0.564 1.126 0.798 Bluefield Westside WWTP VA0025054 8.100 3.858 7.525 6.500 Claypool Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant VA0064271 0.700 0.225 0.394 0.321 Northern Tazewell County WWTF VA0091588 0.500 0.217 0.386 0.330 Richlands Regional WWTF VA0021199 4.000 2.182 4.496 3.209 Tazewell County PSA - Amonate WWTP VA0090620 0.012 0.002 0.003 0.002 Tazewell County PSA - Falls Mills Hales Bottom STP VA0062561 0.108 0.104 0.168 0.103 Tazewell WWTP VA0026298 2.000 0.893 1.809 1.514

Combined Systems Totals, MGD 19.946 10.297 19.567 15.624

The largest WWTP within the Cumberland Plateau Planning District, Bluefield Westside, serves the

Bluefield Sanitary Board’s collection system – which is located primarily in West Virginia.

There are thirty-one (31) active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges within the Cumberland Plateau Planning

District, fifteen (15) of which are public community WWTPs:

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION PERMITTED WWTP DISCHARGE SUMMARIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021

Buchanan Cnty PSA - Conaway WWTP Buchanan Cnty PSA - Council Industrial Park STP Buchanan Cnty PSA - Deskins STP Buchanan Cnty Public Schools - Hurley High School Buchanan Cnty Public Schools - Twin Valley H S STP Buchanan Cnty Public Schools-Hurley Middle School Breaks Interstate Park Breaks Interstate Park Camp 1 STP Camp Jacob Incorporated STP Clintwood WWTP. Dickenson Cnty Public Schools - Ervinton € S STP Dickenson Cnty Public Schools - Sandlick E $ STP Dickenson County Public Service Auth - Haysi STP Dickenson County Public Service Authority STP 1 Dickenson Russell Contura - McClure River Prep Plt Paramont Contura LLC - Deep Mine 41 Paramont Contura LLC -Deep Mine 44 STP Ridgeview High and Middle School Buchanan Cnty Public Schools - Council Elem & HS Cleveland STP Dante Community WWTP DOC - Appalachian Comm Corr Alternative Prog Honaker STP Lebanon WWTP Bluefield Westside WWTP Claypool Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant Northern Tazewell County WWTF Richlands Regional WWTF Tazewell County PSA - Amonate WWTP Tazewell County PSA - Falls Mills Hales Bottom STP Tazewell WWTP

Combined Systems Totals, MGD

Permitted Average Maximum —_ Highest 3-

Flow Daily Daily Consecutive

Capacity, Flowfor —-Flowfor Month Avg.

PermitNo. MGD 2021,MGD 2021, MGD Flow, MGD va0090531 2.000, 1.667 2.350 2.033 va0087254 0.017 0.001 0.001 0.001 va0090239 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 va0026972 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.007 va0068438 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003 va0067521 0.017 0.004 0.004 0.006 va0060275 0.010, 0.000 0.000 0.000 va0023892 0.060 0.010 0.034 0.010 va0086274 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 va0026565 0.495 0.153 0.449 0.238 va0027421 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.001 va0027464 0.010 0.001 0.001 0.003 VA0067571 0.200 0.196 0.329 0.231 va0082589 0.020, 0.004 0.006 0.005 VA0067032 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.003, vao092576 0.015 0.009 0.009 0.009 va0092878 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.001 va0092681 0.035 0.000 0.000 0.000 va0064751 0.023 0.003 0.003 0.005 vaoo21016 0.039 0.040 0.137 0.063, va0088935 0.125 0.032 0.127 0.068 va0020672 0.021 0.005 0.007 0.006 va0026387 0.400 0.113 0.189 0.152 va0020745 0.999 0.564 1.126 0.798 va0025054 8.100 3.858 7.525 6.500 va0064271 0.700, 0.225 0.394 0.321 Va0091588 0.500, 0.217 0.386 0.330 va0021199 4.000, 2.182 4.496 3.209 va0090620 0.012 0.002 0.003 0.002 va0062561 0.108 0.104 0.168 0.103, va0026298 2.000 0.893 1.809 1514 19.946 10.297 19.567 15.624

The largest WWTP within the Cumberland Plateau Planning District, Bluefield Westside, serves the Bluefield Sanitary Board’s collection system — which is located primarily in West Virginia.

There are twenty (20) active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges within the Lenowisco Planning District, twelve (12) of which are public community WWTPs:

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION PERMITTED WWTP DISCHARGE SUMMARIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021

Facility Permit No.

Permitted Flow

Capacity, MGD

Yearly Average

Flow, MGD

Yearly Maximum

Flow, MGD

Highest 3- Consecutive Month Avg. Flow, MGD

Lee County PSA - Hickory Flats WWTP VA0089397 0.800 0.287 0.437 0.316 Lee County Public Service Authority - Cross Creek VA0075515 0.030 0.010 0.010 0.010 Lee County Public Service Authority-Rose Hill WWTP VA0088111 0.060 0.060 0.129 0.074 Pennington Gap STP VA0029599 0.600 0.287 0.657 0.386 Beeline Mobile Home Park LLC VA0064009 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.001 Bellamy Manufacturing and Repair Company STP VA0029084 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 Duffield Industrial Park WWTP VA0029564 0.400 0.199 0.332 0.278 Dungannon STP VA0070670 0.039 0.023 0.062 0.034 Nickelsville WWTP VA0087955 0.070 0.035 0.071 0.053 Scott County PSA - Holston Regional WWTP VA0067351 1.250 0.453 1.287 0.680 Scott County Schools - Hilton Elementary VA0021083 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.007 Scott County Schools - Twin Springs High VA0066311 0.015 0.007 0.001 0.009 Appalachia Elementary School STP VA0060798 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 Big Stone Gap Regional WWTP VA0020940 4.000 1.678 3.594 2.604 Coeburn Norton Wise Regional WWTP VA0077828 6.500 3.651 7.749 5.307 DOC - Wise Correctional Unit 18 STP WWTP VA0023477 0.030 0.012 0.018 0.013 Empire Mobile Home Park STP VA0065471 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.007 Pound WWTP VA0061913 0.500 0.564 1.162 0.719 Robinette Mobile Home Park WWTP VA0092045 0.010 0.001 0.001 0.001 St Paul Wastewater Treatment Plant VA0026221 0.500 0.081 0.148 0.103

Combined Systems Totals, MGD 14.832 7.357 15.669 10.603

There are twenty (20) active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges within the Lenowisco Planning District, twelve (12) of which are public community WWTPs

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION PERMITTED WWTP DISCHARGE SUMMARIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021

Facility Lee County PSA - Hickory Flats WWTP. Lee County Public Se

Pennington Gap STP Beeline Mobile Home Park LLC

Bellamy Manufacturing and Repair Company STP

Duffield Industrial Park WWTP

Dungannon STP

Nickelsville WWTP.

Scott County PSA - Holston Regional WWTP

Scott County Schools - Hilton Elementary

Scott County Schools - Twin Springs High

Appalachia Elementary School STP

Big Stone Gap Regional WWTP

Coeburn Norton Wise Regional WWTP

DOC - Wise Correctional Unit 18 STP WWTP

Empire Mobile Home Park STP

Pound WWTP

Robinette Mobile Home Park WWTP.

St Paul Wastewater Treatment Plant Combined Systems Totals, MGD

Authority - Cross Creek Lee County Public Service Authority-Rose Hill WWTP

Permitted Yearly Yearly Highest 3- Flow Average Maximum — Consecutive

Capacity, Flow, Flow, Month Avg… PermitNo. MGD MGD MGD Flow, MGD va0089397 0.800 0.287 0.437 0.316 va0075515 0.030 0.010 0.010 0.010 VA0088111 0.060 0.060 0.129 0.074 vao029599 0.600 0.287 0.657 0.386 vao064009 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.001 vao029084 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 va0029564 0.400 0.199 0.332 0.278 va0070670 0.039 0.023 0.062 0.034 Va0087955 0.070 0.035 0.071 0.053 va0067351 1.250 0.453 1.287 0.680 vao021083 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.007 va0066311 0.015 0.007 0.001 0.009 VA0060798 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 va0020940 4.000 1.678 3.594 2.604 vA0077828 6.500 3.651 7.749 5.307 va0023477 0.030 0.012 0.018 0.013 va0065471 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.007 va0061913 0.500 0.564 1.162 0.719 va0092045 0.010 0.001 0.001 0.001 vao026221 0.500 0.081 0.148 0.103

14.832 7.357 15.669 10.603

There are thirty (30) active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges within the Mount Rogers Planning District, seventeen (17) of which are public community WWTPs:

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION PERMITTED WWTP DISCHARGE SUMMARIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021

Facility Permit No.

Permitted Flow

Capacity, MGD

Yearly Average

Flow, MGD

Yearly Maximum

Flow, MGD

Highest 3- Consecutive Month Avg. Flow, MGD

VDOC - Bland Correctional Center ESU WWTP VA0020729 0.150 0.084 0.118 0.102 Bastian WWTP VA0089583 0.200 0.098 0.233 0.154 Hillsville WWTP VA0089443 1.250 0.375 0.633 0.427 I-77 Exit 1 WWTP VA0092312 0.020 0.009 0.013 0.011 Olde Mill Golf Resort VA0088498 0.040 0.002 0.004 0.002 Deer Creek Motorcoach Resort WWTP VA0092461 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.004 Fries WWTP VA0067881 0.220 0.085 0.244 0.118 Galax WWTP VA0078484 3.000 1.678 2.694 1.678 Independence STP VA0064424 0.465 0.287 0.445 0.325 Oak Hill Academy STP VA0065714 0.010 0.287 0.445 0.325 Chilhowie Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant VA0026379 0.999 0.264 0.595 0.440 Marion WWTP VA0086304 3.400 1.383 2.963 2.067 Saltville Town - WWTP VA0026808 0.990 0.331 0.627 0.535 Smyth County Public Schools - Northwood Middle VA0029688 0.009 0.004 0.004 0.004 USDA - Forest Service - Grindstone Recreation Area VA0022993 0.017 0.010 0.017 0.009 Callebs Cove Campground STP VA0087882 0.007 0.000 0.001 0.000 Damascus WWTP VA0021130 0.250 0.156 0.348 0.270 The Old Farm Golf Club VA0090182 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 Washington Cnty Service Authority -Hall Creek WWTP VA0087378 0.630 0.324 0.489 0.410 Washington County Public Schools - Holston High VA0026778 0.008 0.002 0.002 0.002 Washington County Public Schools - Watauga Elem VA0065315 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 Washington County Public Schools- Rhea Valley Elem VA0065323 0.012 0.001 0.001 0.001 Washington County Public Schools -Valley Institute VA0026786 0.006 0.001 0.001 0.001 Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility VA0026531 4.950 2.332 4.240 3.593 Fort Chiswell WWTP VA0074161 1.250 0.419 0.610 0.549 Foster Falls WWTP VA0092509 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.001 Rural Retreat Wastewater Treatment Plant VA0021326 0.250 0.233 0.414 0.463 Shorts Creek WWTP VA0092843 0.020 0.002 0.004 0.002 Wythe Cnty Water and Wastewater - Austinville STP VA0067059 0.020 0.003 0.003 0.003 Wytheville WWTP VA0020281 4.000 2.070 3.152 3.066

Combined Systems Totals, MGD 22.199 10.444 18.304 14.562

5.2.3 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems

Onsite wastewater systems are a viable and cost-effective method for the treatment and disposal of wastewater for homes and other small flow sources in the study area, particularly in rural areas where public sewer service is not available. They do have a finite lifetime, however, and as discussed in Section 3.4, there are many older systems that are reaching the end of their useful life and will need to be either upgraded or replaced to prevent system failures. And although more expensive than conventional onsite sewage systems, there are a number of alternative treatment system options available today for upgrades, replacements, or new systems. Onsite septic systems that are properly sited, designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with the VDH Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations will provide years of trouble free sewer service.

There are thirty (30) active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges within the Mount Rogers Planning District, seventeen (17) of which are public community WWTPs:

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION PERMITTED WWTP DISCHARGE SUMMARIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021

Facility VDOC - Bland Correctional Center ESU WWTP Bastian WWTP Hillsville WWTP 1-77 Exit 1 WWTP Olde Mill Golf Resort Deer Creek Motorcoach Resort WWTP Fries WWTP Galax WWTP Independence STP Oak Hill Academy STP. Chilhowie Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Marion WWTP Saltville Town - WWTP ‘Smyth County Public Schools - Northwood Middle USDA - Forest Service - Grindstone Recreation Area Callebs Cove Campground STP Damascus WWTP The Old Farm Golf Club Washington Cnty Service Authority -Hall Creek WWTP Washington County Public Schools - Holston High Washington County Public Schools - Watauga Elem Washington County Public Schools- Rhea Valley Elem Washington County Public Schools -Valley Institute Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility Fort Chiswell WWTP Foster Falls WWTP Rural Retreat Wastewater Treatment Plant Shorts Creek WWTP Wythe Cnty Water and Wastewater - Austinville STP Wytheville WWTP

Combined Systems Totals, MGD

5.2.3 _ Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems

Permitted Yearly Yearly Highest 3-

Flow Average Maximum Consecutive

Capacity, Flow, Flow, Month Avg.

Permit No. MGD MGD MGD Flow, MGD VA0020729 0.150 0.084 0.118 0.102 vA0089583 0.200 0.098 »0.233 0.154 vaooss4a3. 1.250 ©0375 «0.633 0.427 VA0092312 0.020 0.009 0.013 0.011 VA0088498 0.040 0.002 0.004 0.002 vA0092461 0.004 +—0.002.-—=—0.002 0.004 VA0067881 0.220 0.085 0.244 0.118 vaoo7s4s4 3.000 «1.678 (2.694 1.678 vaoos4424 0.465 «0.287 0.45 0.325 VA0065714 0.010 0.287 0.445 0.325 VA0026379 0.999 0.264 0.595 0.440 vaoos6304 3.400 «1.383 (2.963 2.067 vao26808 0.990 © 0.331.—«S=0.627 0535 vao029688 0.009 «0.004. -=—0.004 0.004 VA0022993, 0.017 0.010 0.017 0.009 VA0087882 0.007 0.000 0.001 0.000 VA0021130 0.250 0.156 0.348 0.270 vao090182 0.005 0.000 ~—0.000 0.000 vao0s7378 0.630 ©«0.324.=S0.489 0.410 VA0026778 0.008 0.002 0.002 0.002 \VA0065315, 0.012 0.002 0.002 0.002 VA0065323, 0.012 0.001 0,001 0.001 VA0026786 0.006 ~=—0.001._-—S—«0.001. 0.001 vAao26531 4.950 2.332 4.240 3.593 VA0074161 1.250 0.419 0.610 0.549 VA0092509 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.001 VA0021326 0.250 0.233 0.414 0.463 VA0092843, 0.020 0,002 0,004 0.002 vA0067059 0.020 0.003.~=—«0.003 0.003 vaoo20281 4.000 2.070 3.152 3.066 (22.199 10.444 18.304 14.562

Onsite wastewater systems are a viable and cost-effective method for the treatment and disposal of ‘wastewater for homes and other small flow sources in the study area, particularly in rural areas where public sewer service is not available. They do have a finite lifetime, however, and as discussed in Section 3.4, there are many older systems that are reaching the end of their useful life and will need to be either upgraded or replaced to prevent system failures. And although more expensive than conventional onsite sewage systems, there are a number of alternative treatment system options available today for upgrades, replacements, or new systems. Onsite septic systems that are properly sited, designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with the VDH Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations will provide years of trouble free sewer

service.

The three Health Districts for the study area were requested to provide the total number of permitted, active septic systems within their respective jurisdictions. This information was not readily available for a variety of reasons; digital file records generally only available after 2002, limited availability of paper files earlier than 2022, limited records for former septic systems that have connected to public sewer or moved away, etc. A summary of the information obtained follows:

Cumberland Plateau Health District - # of permitted systems prior to 2002 not provided. The number of new septic systems permitted and repair permits issued since 2002 was provided:

Buchanan County – 2,813 total septic permits issued of which 697 were repair permits

Dickenson County – 2,511 total septic permits issued of which 525 were repair permits

Russell County – 3,537 total septic permits issued of which 455 were repair permits

Tazewell County – 3,209 total septic permits issued of which 371 were repair permits

CPHD Totals – 12,070 total septic permits of which 2,048 were repair permits

LENOWISCO Health District -

Lee County – Estimate 7,700 +/- total permitted septic systems w/ 1,263 systems installed since 2002

Scott County – Estimate 8,500 +/- total permitted septic systems w/ 2,483 systems installed since 2002

Wise County – Estimate 9,227 +/- total permitted septic systems

LHD Totals – Estimate 25,427 total permitted septic systems w/ 3,746 systems installed in Lee and Scott Counties since 2002

Mount Rogers Health District - # of permitted systems prior to 2002 not provided. The number of new septic systems permitted and repair permits issued since 2002 was provided:

Bland County – 1,080 new systems and 155 repairs

Carroll County – 4,369 new systems and 483 repairs

Grayson County – 1,993 new systems and 340 repairs

Smyth County – 2,307 new systems and 339 repairs

Washington County – 5,410 new systems and 676 repairs

Wythe County – 3,186 new systems and 406 repairs

Bristol City – 5 new systems and 4 repairs

Galax City – 17 new systems and 2 repairs

MRHD Totals – 18,367 new systems and 2,405 repairs

5.3 Identified Needs

5.3.1 Infiltration and Inflow

The 2021 calendar year flow records compiled for all collection systems within the study area revealed that inflow and infiltration (I/I) is a significant problem in many of the collection systems. As a combined whole for the entire study area, the collections were found to be only about 44.5% accountable. I/I into the sewer systems reduces the available treatment capacities and often leads to system overflows. In fact, there were over 160 reported overflows within the study area during calendar year 2021.

Cumberland Plateau Health District -# of permitted systems prior to 2002 not provided. The number of new septic systems permitted and repair permits issued since 2002 was provided:

Buchanan County - 2,813 total septic permits issued of which 697 were repair permits Dickenson County ~ 2,511 total septic permits issued of which 525 were repair permits Russell County ~ 3,537 total septic permits issued of which 455 were repair permits

Tazewell County ~ 3,209 total septic permits issued of which 371 were repair permits CPHD Totals - 12,070 total septic permits of which 2,048 were repair permits

LENOWISCO Health District -

Lee County ~ Estimate 7,700 +/- total permitted septic systems w/ 1,263 systems installed since 2002

Scott County ~ Estimate 8,500 +/- total permitted septic systems w/ 2,483 systems installed since 2002

Wise County ~ Estimate 9,227 +/- total permitted septic systems

LHD Totals - Estimate 25,427 total permitted septic systems w/ 3,746 systems installed in Lee and Scott Counties since 2002

Mount Rogers Health District -# of permitted systems prior to 2002 not provided. The number of new septic systems permitted and repair permits issued since 2002 was provided

Bland County ~ 1,080 new systems and 155 repairs Carroll County ~ 4,369 new systems and 483 repairs Grayson County ~ 1,993 new systems and 340 repairs Smyth County ~ 2,307 new systems and 339 repairs ‘Washington County ~ 5,410 new systems and 676 repairs Wythe County ~ 3,186 new systems and 406 repairs Bristol City ~5 new systems and 4 repairs

Galax City ~ 17 new systems and 2 repairs

MRHD Totals ~ 18,367 new systems and 2,405 repairs

5.3 Identified Needs 5.3.1 Infiltration and Inflow

The 2021 calendar year flow records compiled for all collection systems within the study area revealed that inflow and infiltration (1/!) is a significant problem in many of the collection systems. As a combined whole for the entire study area, the collections were found to be only about 44.5% accountable. |/| into the sewer systems reduces the available treatment capacities and often leads to system overflows. In fact, there were over 160 reported overflows within the study area during calendar year 2021.

5.3.2 Existing Collection Systems

The most significant need identified within the existing collection systems would be I/I reduction. DEQ initiated a pilot program in 2020 to help fund sewer system SSES studies within the three far southwest PDC’s. Under the DEQ SSES pilot program, DEQ funded 75% of the SSES cost and the applicant provided a 25% cost share. To date, two funding cycles have been completed with a total of twenty-nine (29) SSES studies having been funded. The average cost of each SSES report was about $103,862. As a followup to the SSES studies, DEQ has also funded a significant portion of the recommended I/I reduction measures. The first round of Phase 2 (construction) funding following completion of the Phase 1 SSES reports totaled $12,909,117 for seven (7) projects, which averaged about $1.844 Million per project. The second round of Phase 2 (construction) funding applications totaled $43,540,411 for fifteen (15) projects, equivalent to about $2.90 Million per project. Appendix H provides additional information about DEQ’s Southwest Virginia Pilot Program.

In addition to I/I reduction measures, a number of other needs were found to be commonplace amongst the study area’s sewer utilities:

• Old, terra cotta sewer line replacement or lining

• Brick manhole rehabilitation or replacement

• Pump station rehabilitation or upgrade

5.3.3 Existing Treatment Facilities

The majority of the existing wastewater treatment plants within the study area are 40 years or older. The typical life expectancy of major equipment items within those plants would be 25 years or less. Accordingly, a number of the plants are in need of equipment replacement and rehabilitation. Additionally, a number of plants are at or near their permitted capacities during 2021.

The following wastewater treatment plants were found to be operating at greater than 80% of their permitted capacity (average daily flow):

Treatment Plant/System Permitted
Capacity, MGD

2021 Average
Daily Flow, MGD

% of
Capacity

Conaway – Buchanan County PSA 2.0 MGD 1.667 MGD 83.3

Haysi – Dickenson County PSA 0.2 0.196 98.0

Town of Cleveland 0.039 0.04 102.6

Falls Mills – Tazewell County PSA 0.108 0.104 96.3

Rose Hill – Lee County PSA 0.06 0.06 100.0

Pound – Wise County PSA 0.5 0.564 112.8

Town of Rural Retreat 0.25 0.233 93.2

5.3.4 Existing Onsite Wastewater Systems

Several needs have been identified during the course of development of this study related to the use of onsite wastewater systems. These are as follows:

• Education – Homeowner awareness is critical for a trouble-free septic system. Homeowners often do not have their septic tank pumped on a regular basis (VDH recommends 3 to 5 years), so they wait until sewage is backing up into the home or on the ground, creating a health hazard. In addition, they are not aware of what should not go into their septic system. EPA has recognized this need for better homeowner awareness of septic systems, and has developed a program called SepticSmart,

5.3.2 _ Existing Collection Systems

The most significant need identified within the existing collection systems would be I/I reduction. DEQ initiated a pilot program in 2020 to help fund sewer system SSES studies within the three far southwest POC’s. Under the DEQ SSES pilot program, DEQ funded 75% of the SSES cost and the applicant provided a 25% cost share. To date, two funding cycles have been completed with a total of twenty-nine (29) SSES studies having been funded. The average cost of each SSES report was about $103,862. As a followup to the SSES studies, DEQ has also funded a significant portion of the recommended I/I reduction measures. The first round of Phase 2 (construction) funding following completion of the Phase 1 SSES reports totaled $12,909,117 for seven (7) projects, which averaged about $1.844 Milllion per project. The second round of Phase 2 (construction) funding applications totaled $43,540,411 for fifteen (15) projects, equivalent to about $2.90 Million per project. Appendix H provides additional information about DEQ’s Southwest Virginia Pilot Program.

In addition to I/I reduction measures, a number of other needs were found to be commonplace amongst the study area’s sewer utilities:

Old, terra cotta sewer line replacement or lining © Brick manhole rehabilitation or replacement. ‘* Pump station rehabilitation or upgrade

5.3.3 Existing Treatment Facilities

The following wastewater treatment plants were found to be operating at greater than 80% of their permitted capacity (average daily flow):

Treatment Plant/System Permitted 2021 Average % of Capacity, MGD | Daily Flow, MGD_| Capacity ‘Conaway ~ Buchanan County PSA 2.0 MGD 1.667 MGD 83.3 Haysi — Dickenson County PSA 0.2 0.196 98.0 ‘Town of Cleveland 0.039 0.04 102.6 Falls Mills ~ Tazewell County PSA. 0.108 0.104 96.3 Rose Hill - Lee County PSA 0.06 0.06 100.0 Pound — Wise County PSA 0.5 0.564 112.8 ‘Town of Rural Retreat 0.25 0.233 93.2

5.3.4 Exi

1g Onsite Wastewater Systems

Several needs have been identified during the course of development of this study related to the use of onsite wastewater systems. These are as follows:

Education - Homeowner awareness is critical for a trouble-free septic system. Homeowners often do not have their septic tank pumped on a regular basis (VDH recommends 3 to 5 years), so they wait until sewage is backing up into the home or on the ground, creating a health hazard. In addition, they are not aware of what should not go into their septic system. EPA has recognized this need for better homeowner awareness of septic systems, and has developed a program called SepticSmart,

that is a nation-wide initiative to share information on the proper care and maintenance of septic systems. Information on SepticSmart can be found at the EPA website (www.epa.gov/septic).

• Operators – This is addressed in Section 3.7 in more detail, but the lack of licensed and qualified operators in Southwest Virginia is a growing problem. With any type of alternative onsite sewage system (AOSS), whether it is a permitted discharge system or an in-ground disposal system, a licensed operator is required to make periodic site visits. But due to the lack of operators, many of the AOSS systems are not receiving the attention and maintenance that they require.

• Funding – There is a need for more funding programs for both the installation and the maintenance of onsite systems. For many homeowners in Southwest Virginia, particularly low-income and those on a fixed income, a new onsite system or an upgrade of an existing system can be cost prohibitive. This is illustrated by a current VDH statewide program called SWAP (Septic and Well Assistance Program), which was overwhelmed in 2022 with applications from low-income families for funding assistance, far outpacing the allocated funding.

• Septage – Septage is the waste material that is pumped out of a septic tank, and is then transported by a pumper truck to a municipal wastewater treatment facility for treatment and disposal. A major problem in Southwest Virginia is the lack of municipal wastewater treatment plants that are willing to accept and treat septage. Longer transportation routes for the pumper/hauler increase the cost for a pump-out, which in turn is passed on to the homeowner.

5.3.5 Discharging Systems (Non-Municipal)

There are 81 active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges in the three Planning Districts, classified as municipal, meaning those with design flows larger than the VPDES General Permit flow limit of 1,000 gal/day. These are listed in Section 5.2.2, Existing Treatment Facilities, where they are broken out by planning district. Flows for these 81 treatment plants range from 3,200 GPD to 8,100,000 GPD, but approximately one-half of them are 40,000 GPD and under. The larger plants, 40,000 GPD and over, are typically owned and operated by responsible management entities (RME) such as cities, towns, counties, PSA’s, and service authorities.
However, many of the plants that are 40,000 GPD and below are under a variety of ownership arrangements, and are not being properly operated and maintained. Some of the reasons are discussed below.

Many of these smaller treatment plants are beyond their useful life and/or have not been properly maintained to the point that they need either replacement of major components or a total replacement of the plant itself. There have been great advances in treatment technologies in recent years for treatment plants in this size range (40,000 GPD and under), and there are treatment systems available today that provide better treatment, are more efficient and use less power, and require much less maintenance than the package plants that were installed 25 to 50 years ago. A source of funding for the replacement or upgrading of these older plants is needed, however, as that is generally not a priority consideration by the owner/operator of the plant.

Many of the treatment plants are not functioning properly due to the lack of knowledgeable operators and/or the lack of attention for proper operation of the plant. For example, there are fifteen (15) school treatment plants, and the assigned operator may be a maintenance employee who has numerous other responsibilities that require attention. Also, the types of treatment systems range from the need for minimal operator attention such as a lagoon to complex systems such as a SBR (sequencing batch reactor) plant that requires a very skilled operator. The lack of licensed treatment system operators in Southwest Virginia has been identified in Section 3.7 as a challenge that needs to be addressed to insure better operation and maintenance of the plants.

that is a nation-wide initiative to share information on the proper care and maintenance of septic systems. Information on SepticSmart can be found at the EPA website (www.epa.gov/septi

Operators ~ This is addressed in Section 3.7 in more detail, but the lack of licensed and qualified operators in Southwest Virginia is a growing problem. With any type of alternative onsite sewage system (AOSS), whether itis a permitted discharge system or an in-ground disposal system, a licensed operator is required to make periodic site visits. But due to the lack of operators, many of the AOSS systems are not receiving the attention and maintenance that they require.
Funding - There is a need for more funding programs for both the installation and the maintenance of onsite systems. For many homeowners in Southwest Virginia, particularly low-income and those ona fixed income, a new onsite system or an upgrade of an existing system can be cost prohibitive. This is illustrated by a current VOH statewide program called SWAP (Septic and Well Assistance Program), which was overwhelmed in 2022 with applications from low-income families for funding assistance, far outpacing the allocated funding.

© Septage—Septage is the waste material that is pumped out of a septic tank, and is then transported bya pumper truck to a municipal wastewater treatment facility for treatment and disposal. A major problem in Southwest Virginia is the lack of municipal wastewater treatment plants that are willing to accept and treat septage. Longer transportation routes for the pumper/hauler increase the cost for a pump-out, which in turn is passed on to the homeowner.

5.3.5 Discharging Systems (Non-Municipal)

There are 81 active VPDES permitted WWTP discharges in the three Planning Districts, classified as municipal, meaning those with design flows larger than the VPDES General Permit flow limit of 1,000 gal/day. These are listed in Section 5.2.2, Existing Treatment Facilities, where they are broken out by planning district. Flows for these 81 treatment plants range from 3,200 GPD to 8,100,000 GPD, but approximately one-half of them are 40,000 GPD and under. The larger plants, 40,000 GPD and over, are typically owned and operated by responsible management entities (RME) such as cities, towns, counties, PSA’s, and service authorities. However, many of the plants that are 40,000 GPD and below are under a variety of ownership arrangements, and are not being properly operated and maintained. Some of the reasons are discussed below.

Additional training opportunities along with possibly funding to make it affordable has been discussed as a means to encourage more licensed operators in the region. The three community colleges in the planning districts would be the logical locations for such training, and an apprenticeship type program offering on-the- job experience has been suggested. Also, the formation of a regional type authority in each planning district to operate and maintain the smaller treatment plants is recommended for consideration (see Section 8.1).

Also, with the treatment and disposal options that are available today, it may be possible to convert some of the discharging plants to in-ground disposal systems and eliminate the VPDES discharge permit. This is currently being done with some of the school systems in Washington County.

5.4 Cost Estimates for Improvement Needs

Uniform cost estimating methodology was developed to prepare estimates for the projects studied herein. Recognizing that construction costs may vary to some degree within the study area, uniform unit pricing has been used to justify cost estimates. Unit pricing was developed by averaging recent bid data from the study region. The uniform cost estimating data utilized in the study is presented in Appendix D.

5.4.1 Existing Collection Systems

The cost information presented for the existing collection systems studied herein is based on costs developed for and presented in sanitary sewer evaluation studies, preliminary engineering reports, capital improvement plans, and asset management plans, where available. If cost estimates were not available from the
aforementioned documents, uniform unit pricing has been utilized to develop costs.

5.4.2 Existing Treatment Facilities

The cost information presented for the existing treatment facilities studied herein is based on costs developed for and presented in projects that have been designed, preliminary engineering reports, capital improvement plans, and asset management plans, where available. If cost estimates were not available from the aforementioned documents, uniform pricing has been utilized to develop costs.

5.4.3 Onsite Wastewater Systems

The cost information for the onsite systems studied herein is based on the installation costs for various types of systems that have been recently installed in Southwest Virginia, and also from consultation with system equipment manufacturer representatives and local licensed installers/contractors.

5.4.4 Present Worth / Inflation / Pandemic

Present Worth - The cost of sewer system ownership can be separated into two categories. The first category is capital cost, which is the measure of the cost to install a new system. Capital costs are composed of hard costs and soft costs. Hard costs include the price of new materials and the cost to install them, while soft capital costs are those that are related to the construction costs such as engineering, legal, rights, and administrative costs. A second cost of ownership of sewer systems is the annual operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. This is the continuous cost of operating the system and keeping it in good repair. The present worth analysis provides a convenient mechanism for accounting for all of the costs in the system analysis. Present Worth, as used in this report, is defined as the amount of money that must be placed on deposit today at 8% interest for 30 years to pay all of the capital and O&M costs for the planning period.

Inflation - According to U.S. Labor Department data published November 10, 2022, the annual inflation rate for the United States is 7.7% for the 12 months that ended October 2022. The significantly increased inflation rates that we are all experiencing have impacted the construction industry resulting in increased construction costs. These rates are driven by a broad based escalation in material prices, material shortages, material

‘Also, with the treatment and disposal options that are available today, it may be possible to convert some of the discharging plants to in-ground disposal systems and eliminate the VPDES discharge permit. This is currently being done with some of the school systems in Washington County.

5.4 Cost Estimates for Improvement Needs

5.4.1 _ Existing Collection Systems

The cost information presented for the existing collection systems studied herein is based on costs developed for and presented in sanitary sewer evaluation studies, preliminary engineering reports, capital improvement plans, and asset management plans, where available. If cost estimates were not available from the aforementioned documents, uniform unit pricing has been utilized to develop costs.

5.4.2 Existing Treatment Facilities

5.4.3 Onsite Wastewater Systems

‘The cost information for the onsite systems studied herein is based on the installation costs for various types of systems that have been recently installed in Southwest Virginia, and also from consultation with system equipment manufacturer representatives and local licensed installers/contractors.

5.4.4 Present Worth / Inflation / Pandemic

delivery issues, and labor shortages. These price increases are being passed on to Owners with current bids for multi-million dollar projects locally varying from 10 to 50% over-budget. With this in mind, the cost estimates for these projects attempt to reflect these conditions, but future bidding and economic climates are difficult to forecast.

Pandemic - Per the study, Impact of COVID-19 on the US Construction Industry as Revealed in the Purdue Index for Construction, by JungHo Jeon, Suyash Padhye, Arkaprabha Bhattacharyya, Hubo Cai and Makarand Hastak, “The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought unprecedented impacts (e.g., labor shortage, suspension and cancellation of projects, and disrupted supply and logistics) on the US construction industry.” These impacts have been realized within the study area with fewer contractors bidding projects, bids being over budget, the start of projects being delayed due to material supply, and contractors requesting allowances for material price increases due to the volatility of material supply/cost.

6.0 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study

6.1 Study Purpose

The 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study was intended to serve as a road map for future implementation of sanitary sewer collection, treatment and disposal projects in Southwest Virginia. The Study’s goals included identifying the need for sewer service in the region, identifying and prioritizing projects, finding and identifying funding sources for these projects, and eliminating the health hazards and environmental problems associated with inadequate septic systems and straight pipe discharges to streams. The study also identified projects that, due their remote location, topographic situations, small size or soil conditions, would benefit from non-traditional de-centralized managed wastewater systems (DMWS).

During the course of the 2005 Study, the Design Team examined over 136 projects. These projects were analyzed and prioritized based on the degree of health hazard, the severity of environmental problems, the number of customers served, construction cost per connection, construction feasibility, as well as residential, commercial and industrial growth potential. The project rankings led to a recommendation to pursue 43 centralized projects, 12 de-centralized projects and 3 hybrid projects combining new de-centralized sewer collection with existing central systems. The projects identified in the 2005 Study were all related to establishing new sewer service areas. The 2005 Study did not include existing system improvements or rehabilitation.

6.2 Projects Identified and Realized / Successes

The municipalities, public service authorities, and PDCs within the study area of the 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Study have successfully completed twenty-seven (27) of the targeted projects. The breakdown of the projects constructed by Planning District is four (4) in the Mount Rogers PDC, thirteen (13) in the LENOWISCO PDC, and ten (10) in the Cumberland Plateau PDC. Refer to Table below for a list of the completed projects, as well as a list of twelve (12) projects that have been partially completed to date.

Pandemic - Per the study, Impact of COVID-19 on the US Construction Industry as Revealed in the Purdue Index for Construction, by JungHo Jeon, Suyash Padhye, Arkaprabha Bhattacharyya, Hubo Cai and Makarand Hastak, “The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought unprecedented impacts (e.g, labor shortage, suspension and cancellation of projects, and disrupted supply and logistics) on the US construction industry.” These impacts have been realized within the study area with fewer contractors bidding projects, bids being over budget, the start of projects being delayed due to material supply, and contractors requesting allowances for material price increases due to the volatility of material supply/cost.

6.0 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study 6.1 Study Purpose

During the course of the 2005 Study, the Design Team examined over 136 projects. These projects were analyzed and prioritized based on the degree of health hazard, the severity of environmental problems, the number of customers served, construction cost per connection, construction feasibility, as well as residential, commercial and industrial growth potential. The project rankings led to a recommendation to pursue 43, centralized projects, 12 de-centralized projects and 3 hybrid projects combining new de-centralized sewer collection with existing central systems. The projects identified in the 2005 Study were all related to establishing new sewer service areas. The 2005 Study did not include existing system improvements or rehabilitation

6.2 Projects Identified and Realized / Successes

                  Projects Completed from the 2005  

           Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study

County PDC Project

Buchanan CP Poplar Creek

Dickenson CP Rt 83/Georges Fork

Dickenson CP Birchleaf

Russell CP Castlewood

Russell CP Hansonville

Tazewell CP Baptist Valley East

Tazewell CP Gratton

Tazewell CP Tazewell to Divides

Tazewell CP Birmingham

Tazewell CP Dry Town

Lee LEN Rose Hill

Lee LEN Red Hill/Poor Valley

Lee LEN Woodway

Scott LEN Daniel Boone

Scott LEN Yuma

Scott LEN Hiltons

Wise LEN Tacoma

Wise LEN Esserville

Wise LEN Stonega

Wise LEN Josephine

Wise LEN Osaka/Roda

Wise LEN Riverview

Wise LEN Fairgrounds

Carroll MTR I-77/Route 620

Washington MTR West Central (Beaver Creek)

Washington MTR Spring Creek

Washington MTR Washington County Industrial Park

Projects Completed from the 2005

‘Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study

County PDC | Project

Buchanan cP | Poplar Creek Dickenson cp Rt 83/Georges Fork Dickenson cp | Birchleaf

Russell cP _| Castlewood

Russell cP | Hansonville Tazewell cP | Baptist Valley East Tazewell cp ‘| Gratton

Tazewell cP | Tazewell to Divides Tazewell cp | Birmingham Tazewell cp | Dry Town

Lee LEN | Rose Hill

Lee LEN | Red Hill/Poor Valley Lee LEN | Woodway

Scott LEN | Daniel Boone

Scott LeN | Yuma

Scott LeN | Hiltons

Wise LEN | Tacoma

Wise LEN | Esserville

Wise LEN | Stonega

Wise LEN | Josephine

Wise LEN | Osaka/Roda

Wise LEN | Riverview

Wise LEN | Fairgrounds

Carroll MTR | 1-77/Route 620 Washington MTR | West Central (Beaver Creek) ‘Washington MTR | Spring Creek ‘Washington MTR | Washington County Industrial Park

Projects Partially Completed from the 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study

County PDC Project Status

Lee LEN Woodway PER/ER completed and approved by RD only

Scott LEN Daniel Boone Phase 1 only completed – Phase 2 & 3 remaining

Scott LEN Yuma Phase 1 complete

Scott LEN Yuma Phase 2, 3 & 4 design complete, advertise 2023

Scott LEN Hiltons Design complete, advertise 2023

Wise LEN South Coeburn/Sheffield Acres Partially completed

Wise LEN Banner Design complete, advertise 2023

Carroll MTR Cana / I-77 I-77 Exit 1 Partially Complete

Washington MTR West Central (Beaver Creek) Partially completed

Washington MTR Spring Creek Design complete. Planning to advertise 2023

Washington MTR Wash Co Industrial Park PER/ER Completed Approved by RD

Wythe MTR Poplar Camp / Foster Falls Poplar Camp Only Completed

7.0 Evaluation of Unserved Areas in Need of Wastewater

The sanitary sewer projects that were identified in the 2005 Study to provide sewer service to unserved areas and were not realized have been updated in this Study. Additionally, any new projects that have been identified by the project team to provide sewer service to unserved areas have also been included in this Study. The basis for the determination of the need for wastewater service includes areas of environmental concern based on existing water quality impairments, poor soils and/or inadequate disposal including failing on-site septic systems and straight piping. The local Health Departments provided information for this Study with regards to areas with failing on-site septic systems and straight piping.

7.1 Categorizing Proposed Projects by Type

7.1.1 Extensions of Existing Systems – Conventional

As shown previously in this Sstudy, there are approximately seventy-one (71) existing public conventional wastewater systems located within the study area. These are the most common type of publicly owned wastewater systems and contain collection lines and a centralized treatment facility. They are used to collect and treat large volumes of wastewater. The collection system typically requires large diameter deep pipes, major excavation and frequent manhole access. At the treatment facility, the wastewater is treated to standards required for discharge to a surface water body. The large amounts of biosolids (sludge) generated in treatment are treated and either land-applied, placed on a surface disposal site or incinerated. When unserved areas are within relatively close proximity to an existing conventional system, extension of the existing system is usually the most economically feasible way to provide sewer service.

Projects Partially Completed from the 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study

County PDC Project Status

lee LEN Woodway PER/ER completed and approved by RD only

Scott LEN Daniel Boone Phase 1 only completed — Phase 2 & 3 remaining

Scott LEN Yuma Phase 1 complete

Scott LEN Yuma Phase 2, 3 & 4 design complete, advertise 2023

Scott LEN Hiltons Design complete, advertise 2023

Wise LEN South Coeburn/Sheffield Acres | Partially completed

Wise LEN Banner Design complete, advertise 2023

Carroll MTR Cana /1-77 1-77 Exit 1 Partially Complete

‘Washington MTR West Central (Beaver Creek) | Partially completed

‘Washington MTR Spring Creek Design complete. Planning to advertise 2023

‘Washington MTR Wash Co Industrial Park PER/ER Completed Approved by RD

Wythe MTR Poplar Camp / Foster Falls Poplar Camp Only Completed

7.0 Evaluation of Unserved Areas in Need of Wastewater

‘The sanitary sewer projects that were identified in the 2005 Study to provide sewer service to unserved areas and were not realized have been updated in this Study. Additionally, any new projects that have been identified by the project team to provide sewer service to unserved areas have also been included in this Study. The basis for the determination of the need for wastewater service includes areas of environmental concern based on existing water quality impairments, poor soils and/or inadequate disposal including failing on-site septic systems and straight piping. The local Health Departments provided information for this Study with regards to areas with failing on-site septic systems and straight piping.

7.1 Categorizing Proposed Projects by Type 7.1.1 _ Extensions of Existing Systems - Conventional

‘As shown previously in this Sstudy, there are approximately seventy-one (71) existing public conventional wastewater systems located within the study area. These are the most common type of publicly owned wastewater systems and contain collection lines and a centralized treatment facility. They are used to collect and treat large volumes of wastewater. The collection system typically requires large diameter deep pipes, major excavation and frequent manhole access. At the treatment facility, the wastewater is treated to standards required for discharge to a surface water body. The large amounts of biosolids (sludge) generated in treatment are treated and either land-applied, placed on a surface disposal site or incinerated. When unserved areas are within relatively close proximity to an existing conventional system, extension of the existing system is usually the most economically feasible way to provide sewer service.

7.1.2 Development of New Conventional Systems

For unserved areas that are isolated or require a cost prohibitive amount of collection system to be constructed to connect to an existing conventional system, construction of a new conventional system has been proposed which would include both the collection system and a wastewater treatment facility.

7.1.3 Development of New Decentralized Wastewater Systems

Decentralized wastewater systems are an option in areas of the three Planning Districts where there are problems with existing onsite wastewater treatment systems, such as straight piping or failing systems, and where access to municipal wastewater service is not a cost-effective solution. These problem areas have been identified in letters from each of the Environmental Health Managers in their respective health districts (See Appendix E).

Decentralized managed wastewater systems (DMWS) are managed onsite sewage systems, that in simplest terms means sewage that is collected, treated, and disposed of at or near its source. The concept of DMWS has slowly been gaining acceptance over the last 25 years or so as a cost-effective solution for less densely populated areas. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) validated the concept in 1997 in a report to Congress with the statement:

Adequately managed decentralized wastewater systems are a cost-effective
and long term option for meeting public health and water quality goals.

Since then, EPA has formed a Decentralized Wastewater Partnership which is a collaboration between EPA and national organizations (20 at present) representing practitioners in the decentralized wastewater industry. It is designed to improve the overall performance and management of decentralized wastewater systems. Information on this partnership can be found on the EPA website (www.epa.gov/septic).

Decentralized wastewater systems (DWS) typically have lower capital costs and operation and maintenance costs than municipal wastewater systems, while still providing protection of the environment, public health, and water quality. DWS in many cases use the natural treatment properties of the soil by taking into account basic principles in nature, resulting in the wise use of energy and land. In doing so, DWS can be considered a ‘green’ technology when treated effluent is dispersed into the ground, which recharges local groundwater aquifers. Thus, DWS are a way to ‘get back to nature’ by using today’s onsite treatment and disposal technologies.

DWS include a variety of approaches for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater, and can be designed to serve individual homes, clusters of homes (and businesses), or entire communities. An evaluation of site specific soil conditions is required to determine the appropriate type of DWS for a particular location. They can then become a part of a permanent infrastructure system, when managed by a responsible management entity (RME).

EPA has prepared several position papers that include information on the uses and benefits of decentralized wastewater treatment, along with examples of locations where it has played an effective role in a community’s wastewater treatment infrastructure. Two of these position papers discuss community systems in Virginia, and copies are included in Appendix G.

7.1.3.1 Methodology for Determining Cost Effectiveness of Decentralized Wastewater Systems

Decentralized wastewater systems (DWS), as described in the previous section, can be a cost-effective solution for providing sewer service in certain areas of the three planning districts, especially in lesser populated areas. The methodology used for determining cost effectiveness is similar to the methodology used

7.1.2 Development of New Conventional Systems

7.1.3 Development of New Decentralized Wastewater Systems

Adequately managed decentralized wastewater systems are a cost-effective and long term option for meeting public health and water quality goals.

7.1.3.1 Methodology for Determining Cost Effectiveness of Decentralized Wastewater Systems

for the extension of municipal wastewater systems: an evaluation based on total project cost, cost per connection, present worth analysis, and the monthly user cost to the customer. An additional component, however, for consideration with decentralized systems is the management of them. This is discussed in the following Section 7.1.3.2.

The present worth analysis or life cycle cost analysis of a project is a method that accounts for both the initial capital cost plus the annual operation and maintenance costs over the projected life of the system. The operation and maintenance costs for onsite systems differ somewhat from municipal systems as components typically are on a smaller scale both in terms of collection and treatment. For example, sewer lines are generally designed to convey pre-settled septic tank effluent with no solids to a treatment system, so sewer line clogging is rare. And effluent sewer lines are smaller and are typically installed like water lines along roads, and not in or near streams and rivers like larger municipal collection systems. The result is infiltration and inflow problems that are common with the larger municipal systems are minimized with DWS. In addition, treatment plants in the onsite industry are much smaller in comparison to municipal plants, and today’s DWS plants use energy efficient technology and are designed to require minimal operator attention, some even allowing remote monitoring with telemetry systems. Routine maintenance tasks are still required, however, such as the pumping of septic tanks, and treatment plant visits by a licensed operator are required on a regular schedule, varying from monthly to quarterly to annually depending on the size and type of the treatment system. Effluent sampling and testing is also required for the treatment system, with the frequency and parameters to be tested varying based on the size of the plant and whether it is discharging to a stream or into the ground.

7.1.3.2 Analysis of Ownership, Operation and Maintenance of Decentralized Wastewater Systems

An important consideration when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of decentralized wastewater systems (DWS) is that they be owned and operated by what EPA defines as a responsible management entity (RME).
This can be a town, city, or county service authority, but there has been a reluctance on the part of some of the sewer providers in the study area to assume ownership and operation of DWS. There are other options for RME’s, however, such as a privately owned operating company, a public-private partnership (PPP), or a separate regional authority. See Section 8.1 for further discussion of this last option. However, regardless of who the RME is, management costs must be included when determining the cost effectiveness of a DWS project.

7.2 Undeveloped Projects from 2005 Study

Appendix B includes individual project sheet descriptions and updated cost estimates for potential sewer extension projects that were identified in the 2005 Study but have not yet been completed.

The present worth analysis or life cycle cost analysis of a project is a method that accounts for both the initial capital cost plus the annual operation and maintenance costs over the projected life of the system. The operation and maintenance costs for onsite systems differ somewhat from municipal systems as components typically are on a smaller scale both in terms of collection and treatment. For example, sewer lines are generally designed to convey pre-settled septic tank effluent with no solids to a treatment system, so sewer line clogging is rare. And effluent sewer lines are smaller and are typically installed like water lines along roads, and not in or near streams and rivers like larger municipal collection systems. The result is infiltration and inflow problems that are common with the larger municipal systems are minimized with DWS. In addition, treatment plants in the onsite industry are much smaller in comparison to municipal plants, and today’s DWS plants use energy efficient technology and are designed to require minimal operator attention, some even allowing remote monitoring with telemetry systems. Routine maintenance tasks are still required, however, such as the pumping of septic tanks, and treatment plant visits by a licensed operator are required ona regular schedule, varying from monthly to quarterly to annually depending on the size and type of the treatment system. Effluent sampling and testing is also required for the treatment system, with the frequency and parameters to be tested varying based on the size of the plant and whether itis discharging to a stream or into the ground.

7.1.3.2 Analysis of Ownership, Operation and Maintenance of Decentralized Wastewater Systems

‘An important consideration when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of decentralized wastewater systems (DWS) is that they be owned and operated by what EPA defines as a responsible management entity (RME). This can be a town, city, or county service authority, but there has been a reluctance on the part of some of the sewer providers in the study area to assume ownership and operation of DWS. There are other options for RME’s, however, such as a privately owned operating company, a public-private partnership (PPP), or a separate regional authority. See Section 8.1 for further discussion of this last option. However, regardless of who the RME is, management costs must be included when determining the cost effectiveness of a DWS project.

7.2. Undeveloped Projects from 2005 Study

Appendix B includes individual project sheet descriptions and updated cost estimates for potential sewer extension projects that were identified in the 2005 Study but have not yet been completed.

7.2.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District

Thirty-one (31) of the centralized collection system projects identified for the CP Planning District in the 2005 Study have not been developed. The 2005 CP Planning District project ranking list follows:

Five (5) of the decentralized system projects evaluated in the 2005 Study have not been developed in the Cumberland Plateau Planning District. They are as follows, along with their 2005 project ranking.

McClure/Stratton (# 2) – Dickenson County
Nora (# 3) – Dickenson County (partially completed)
Greenbrier (# 14) – Buchanan County
Rosedale (# 19) – Russell County
Hurley (# 20) – Buchanan County

7.2.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District

1, McClure/Stratton (## 2) - Dickenson County

Nora (## 3) - Dickenson County (partially completed) Greenbrier (# 14) - Buchanan County

Rosedale (# 19) — Russell County

Hurley (# 20) - Buchanan County

vaen

7.2.2 LENOWISCO Planning District

Twenty-two (22) of the centralized collection system projects identified for the LENOWISCO Planning District in the 2005 Study have not been developed. The 2005 LENOWISCO Planning District project ranking list follows:

Five (5) of the decentralized system projects evaluated in the 2005 Study have not been developed in the LENOWISCO Planning District. They are as follows, along with their 2005 project ranking.

Dotson Fork/Meade Fork (# 4) – Wise County
Cranes Nest (# 6) – Wise County
Dunbar (# 12) – Wise County
Mill Creek (# 23) – Scott County
Bishoptown (# 25) – Scott County

7.2.2 LENOWISCO Planning District

‘Twenty-two (22) of the centralized collection system projects identified for the LENOWISCO Planning District in the 2005 Study have not been developed. The 2005 LENOWISCO Planning District project ranking list follows:

Five (5) of the decentralized system projects evaluated in the 2005 Study have not been developed in the LENOWISCO Planning District. They are as follows, along with their 2005 project ranking.

1, Dotson Fork/Meade Fork (# 4) ~ Wise County Cranes Nest (1 6) - Wise County

Dunbar (# 12) ~ Wise County

Mill Creek (# 23) ~ Scott County

Bishoptown (tf 25) ~ Scott County

yaen

7.2.3 Mount Rogers Planning District

Thirty-three (33) of the centralized collection system projects identified for the MR Planning District in the 2005 Study have not been developed. The 2005 MR Planning District project ranking list follows:

Eight (8) of the decentralized system projects evaluated in the 2005 Study have not been developed in the Mount Rogers Planning District. They are as follows, along with their 2005 project ranking.

Clinchburg (# 10) – Washington County (also evaluated as a centralized collection project)
St. Clair Creek (# 11) – Smyth County
Flat Ridge/Sugar Grove (# 13) – Smyth County
Walker Creek (# 15) – Smyth County
Hutton Branch (# 16) – Smyth County
Rush Creek (# 18) – Washington County
Ivanhoe (# 21) – Wythe County
Troutdale (# 22) – Grayson County

7.2.3 Mount Rogers Planning District

Eight (8) of the decentralized system projects evaluated in the 2005 Study have not been developed in the Mount Rogers Planning District. They are as follows, along with their 2005 project ranking,

1, Clinchburg (# 10) ~ Washington County (also evaluated as a centralized collection project) St. Clair Creek (#11) - Smyth County

Flat Ridge/Sugar Grove (# 13) - Smyth County

‘Walker Creek (# 15) - Smyth County

Hutton Branch (# 16) - Smyth County

Rush Creek (# 18) ~ Washington County

Ivanhoe (# 21) ~ Wythe County

Troutdale (# 22) - Grayson County

PN OVA wN

7.3 New Projects Identified for Evaluation

For the purpose of this Study, potential wastewater projects were identified, cost estimates were prepared, and a priority ranking was established. Potential projects identified were categorized into one of three project types; Centralized Collection System Extensions, Existing System Upgrades, and Decentralized Systems. The Centralized Collection System Extensions and Decentralized Systems include both those uncompleted projects identified in the 2005 Study and new projects identified in this Study. All potential projects were ranked using the criteria discussed in Section 7.4 of this Study. The potential projects for each category/type were grouped by their respective Planning District locations.

It is noteworthy that the majority of all Centralized Collection and Decentralized System projects considered remain uncompleted from the 2005 Study. Very few of public sewer service providers identified new potential service areas. Instead, most of the public sewer service providers placed more emphasis on Existing System Upgrade Projects – highlighting the need for assistance just to maintain existing systems.

7.3.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District

A total of thirty-three (33) potential Centralized collection system projects were identified within the Cumberland Plateau Planning District, thirty-one (31) of which are uncompleted from the 2005 Study and two (2) new projects. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appendix B. An Individual scoring matrix printout for each project is provided in Appendix J. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Health

Hazards, &

Water

Quality

Problems

Affordable/

Project Cost/

Connection

Regional

Effort

Equiv. # of

Residential

Connections

Served

Avg Sewer

Bill as a % of

Project

Area’s MHI

Environment.

Justice - EPA

EJScreen

Report for

Project Area

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Russell Dante to St. Paul 30 25 8 6 10 4 83 3,219,713

Tazewell Abbs Valley 25 16 0 10 5 3 59 13,287,732

Russell Swords Creek 25 10 0 10 10 3 58 20,012,980

Tazewell Bluefield to Divides Phases 2 and 3 25 16 0 10 5 2 58 24,253,944

Russell Castlewood Phase 2 (Mew Road) 20 10 8 6 10 2 56 7,962,175

Tazewell Route 639 (Cliffield to Baptist Valley) 25 16 0 6 5 2 54 4,448,860

Tazewell Baptist Valley West 25 10 0 10 5 3 53 53,249,703

Buchanan Lynn Camp / Looney Creek 25 10 0 6 8 3 52 7,250,100

Dickenson Lockhart Flats 25 10 0 6 8 2 51 3,505,060

Russell Drill Mountain 25 5 0 8 10 3 51 16,811,080

Tazewell Red Ash 25 10 0 6 5 5 51 5,199,025

Buchanan Leemaster/Lovers Gap/ Dry Fork 20 10 0 8 8 4 50 14,381,380

Tazewell Wrights Valley/ Witten Mill to Tiptop 25 7 0 10 5 2 49 20,376,688

Tazewell Jewell Ridge Sewer Extension 25 7 0 8 5 3 48 14,978,275

Tazewell Tazewell to Claypool Hill - Alternative 1 25 5 0 10 5 3 48 51,313,080

Tazewell Wrights Valley/ Tiptop to St. Clair’s Crossing 25 7 0 8 5 2 47 15,322,450

Buchanan Lower Mill Branch / Elkins Branch 25 5 0 6 8 2 46 8,312,525

Tazewell Forest Hills 25 7 0 4 5 3 44 5,226,975

Tazewell Kents Ridge North 25 5 0 4 5 5 44 7,370,090

Tazewell Kents Ridge South 25 5 0 4 5 5 44 6,157,060

Tazewell Mill Creek 25 5 0 6 5 3 44 8,193,250

Tazewell Road Ridge 25 5 0 4 5 5 44 8,799,765

Tazewell Willow Springs Phase 3 25 7 0 4 5 3 44 2,006,342

Tazewell Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Tazewell) 25 5 0 6 5 3 44 14,506,960

Tazewell Route 637 25 7 0 4 5 2 43 2,921,880

Tazewell Wardell 25 5 0 4 5 4 43 9,246,900

Tazewell Greens Chapel 25 5 0 4 5 3 42 4,111,510

Tazewell Route 699 25 5 0 4 5 3 42 4,178,135

Tazewell Willow Springs Phase 2 25 5 0 4 5 3 42 785,525

Tazewell Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Liberty) 25 5 0 4 5 3 42 7,714,850

Tazewell Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Wardell) 25 5 0 4 5 3 42 16,695,250

Tazewell Bishop 0 16 0 6 5 3 30 6,916,975

Tazewell Tazewell to Claypool Hill - Alternative 2 0 5 0 10 5 3 23 47,766,680

Total 436,482,917$

Overall Project Ranking - Centralized Projects Cumberland Plateau Planning District

7.3 New Projects Identified for Evaluation

For the purpose of this Study, potential wastewater projects were identified, cost estimates were prepared, and a priority ranking was established. Potential projects identified were categorized into one of three project types; Centralized Collection System Extensions, Existing System Upgrades, and Decentralized Systems. The Centralized Collection System Extensions and Decentralized Systems include both those uncompleted projects identified in the 2005 Study and new projects identified in this Study, All potential projects were ranked using the criteria discussed in Section 7.4 of this Study. The potential projects for each category/type were grouped by their respective Planning District locations.

It is noteworthy that the majority of all Centralized Collection and Decentralized System projects considered remain uncompleted from the 2005 Study. Very few of public sewer service providers identified new potential service areas. Instead, most of the public sewer service providers placed more emphasis on Existing System. Upgrade Projects — highlighting the need for assistance just to maintain existing systems.

7.3.1 Cumberland Plateau Planning District

printout for each project is provided in Appendix J. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

Health Environment

Hanarde, & Eauwtot AvgSewer Justice - EPA

ister Affordable Residential gillsea%of Screen

Quality Project Cost? Regional Connections Project. Reportfor Total Estimated county Problems Connection Effort Served Area’sMM_ Project Area Project cost fuseell Dante tt. Poul 0 ra 8 6 10 4 & 3219,713 Tazewell Abbs Valley B 6 ° 10 5 3 8 Bam Russell Swords Creek 25 10 ° 10 10 3 38 20012580 Tanewell Aluefieldto Divides Phases 2and 3 cs 6 o 10 5 2 8 24,253,908 fuszell Castlewood Phase 2(Mew Road) 20 0 a 6 10 2 56 7,962,175 Tazewell Route 639(Clfield to Baptist Valley) B 6 ° 6 5 2 ss 4,950 Tazewell Baptist valley West 23 10 ° 10 5 3 2 3,209,708, Buchanan Lynn Camp /Loaney Creek rs 0 ° 6 8 3 5 7250,100, Dickenson Lockhart Fats 28 10 o 6 8 2 st 3,505,060, fussell_—_ Dall Mountain 25 5 ° 8 10 3 st 16,811,080, Tasewell Red.Ash rs 0 o 6 5 5 s 5,109,005 Buchanan Leemaster/LoversGap/ Dry Fork 20 0 ° 8 8 4 50 14,381,380 Tazewell Wrights Valiey/ Witten mall 10Tiptop 3 7 ° 0 5 2 ° 20,376,688 Tazewell Jewell Ridge Sewer Extension 8 7 ° 8 5 3 @ 14978275 Tazewell Tazewell o Claypool Hill- Alternative 1 rs 5 ° 10 5 3 s 51,313,080 Tazewell Wrights Valley/TiptoptoSt.Clai’sCrossing 25, 7 o 8 5 2 a 15,322,450 Buchanan Lower Mill Branch / Elkins Branch 25 5 ° 5 8 2 46 5.312.525 Tazewell Forest ills 2s 7 o 4 5 a “ 5226.75 Tazewell Kents Ridge North 28 5 o 4 5 5 “ 737.090 Tazewell Kents Ridge South 25 5 ° 4 5 5 “4 6157,060, Tazewell Mil reek cs 5 o 6 5 3 “ £193,250, Tazewell Road Ridge a 5 ° 4 5 5 “ 8,799,765 Tazewell Willow Springs Phase 3 8 7 o 4 5 a “ 2,006,342 ‘Tazewell Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel -Tarewell) 23 5 ° 6 5 3 “ 14,506 960, Tazewell Route 637 % 7 ° a 5 2 8 2.921.880 Tazewell Wardell 28 5 o 4 5 4 2 9286,900 Tazewell Greens Chapel 25 5 ° 4 5 3 2 4111510 Tarewell Route 609 3 s o 4 5 3 2 4378135 Tazewell Willow Springs Phase 2 2 5 o 4 5 a 2 735.525 Tazewell Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Liberty) B 5 o 4 5 3 2 776850 Tazewell Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Warde) 23 5 ° 4 5 3 2 16,685,250, Tazewell Bishop ° 16 ° 6 5 3 30 6916.95 Tazewell Tazewell to Claypool Mill- Alternative 2 ° 5 o 0 5 a 2 47,755,680

Total § 436,482,917

A total of fourteen (14) potential Existing System Upgrade projects were identified within the Cumberland Plateau Planning District. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appendix C. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Targeted

Project Types

& Outcomes

Environment.

Concerns -

Priority

Watersheds

Enforcement

/ Compliance

History

COLG

Composite

Fiscal Stress

Index

Potential

Bonus Points

for Towns or

Cities

Readiness

to Proceed

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Buchanan Buchanan County PSA - Conaway WWTP Upgrades 41 0 1 12 0 4 58 29,437,946

Russell Town of Cleveland WWTP Expansion 25 15 1 12 0 0 53 1,000,000

Buchanan Buchanan County PSA - SSES 33 0 1 12 0 1 47 5,065,000

Dickenson Dickenson County PSA - Haysi Sewer Replacement 33 0 1 12 0 1 47 1,910,094

Russell Town of Lebanon SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 4 12 0 1 40 2,921,700

Russell Town of Lebanon WWTP Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 1 40 6,715,000

Tazewell Town of Richlands - WWTP Improvements 16 0 1 12 2 8 39 12,653,797

Tazewell Town of Tazewell - WWTP Improvements 16 0 1 12 2 8 39 15,645,000

Russell Town of Honaker SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 1 12 0 1 37 4,725,000

Tazewell Town of Cedar Bluff SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 1 12 0 0 36 1,987,500

Tazewell Tazewell County PSA - Falls Mills SSES 16 0 1 12 2 1 32 19,708,054

Tazewell Town of Tazewell - SSES 8 0 1 12 2 0 23 22,891,448

Russell Town of Honaker WWTP Improvements 8 0 1 12 0 1 22 2,612,704

Tazewell Town of Richlands SSES 8 0 1 12 0 0 21 12,795,213

Total 140,068,456$

Overall Project Ranking - Existing System Upgrade Projects Cumberland Plateau Planning District

Within the Cumberland Plateau Planning District, twelve (12) potential decentralized community wastewater projects were identified, five (5) of which are uncompleted from the 2005 Study and seven (7) new projects. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Health

Hazards, &

Water

Quality

Problems

Affordable/

Project Cost/

Connection

Community

Involvemen

t &

Willingness

Responsible

Management

Entity

Avg Sewer

Bill as a % of

Project

Area’s MHI

Environment.

Justice - EPA

EJScreen

Report for

Project Area

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Buchanan Hurley 30 20 0 10 10 3 73 4,222,700

Tazewell Hillcrest 20 20 5 15 8 5 73 795,200

Russell Carbo 20 20 0 15 8 6 69 511,900

Tazewell Baptist Valley West 30 10 5 15 5 3 68 6,162,900

Russell Old Castlewood 25 10 5 15 8 4 67 773,100

Dickenson McClure Stratton 30 10 5 10 8 2 65 3,997,200

Dickenson Nora 30 10 5 10 8 2 65 623,400

Buchanan Greenbrier 30 10 0 10 10 3 63 3,667,700

Russell Rosedale 15 20 0 15 8 2 60 4,020,900

Russell Clinchfield 20 10 0 15 5 6 56 1,033,000

Tazewell St. Clair Heights Subdivision 20 10 0 15 5 2 52 1,518,400

Tazewell Ebenezer Subdivision 20 10 0 15 5 2 52 1,311,200

Total 28,637,600$

Overall Project Ranking - Decentralized Projects - Cumberland Plateau Planning District

Overall Project Ranking - Existing System Upgrade Projects Cumberland Plateau Planning District

Environment COLG Potential

Targeted Concerns Enforcement Composite Bonus Points

Project Types Priority [Compliance FiscalStess. forTownsor Readiness _ Total Estimated count Project Nam ‘ROutcomes Watersheds History Index —<Ciles-—~koProceed Points Project Cost Buchanan Buchanan County PSA Conaway WWTP Upgrades a 0 1 2 ° 4 5B 25,437,806, Russell Town of Cleveland WWTP Expansion co 6 1 2 ° ° 531,000,000 fauchanan Buchanan County PSA.-SSES 3 ° 1 2 ° a 47 5065,000 Dickenson Dickenson County PSA Haysi Sewer Replacement 33, 0 1 2 ° 1 471910096 Russell Town of Lebanon SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 4 2 ° 1 40 _2921,700 Russell Town of Lebanon WWTP Improvements 8 5 4 2 ° 4 4 _6715,000 Tazewell Town of Richlands - WWTP Improvements 6 0 1 2 2 8 39 12853,797 Tazewell Town of Tazewell- WWTP Improvements 16 ° 1 2 2 8 39 15,685,000 Russell Town of Honaker SSES Rehabilitation 8 5 1 2 ° 1 374,725,000 Tazewell Town of Cedar Bluff SES Rehabilitation 8 15 1 2 ° ° 36 —_1587,500 Tazewell Tazewell County PSA Falls Mills SES 16 ° 1 2 2 4 32 19,708,054 Tazewell Town of Tazewell -SSES 2 a 1 2 2 ° 2B so1eee Russell Town of Honaker WWTP Improvements 8 ° 1 2 ° 1 2 2612.76 Tazewell Town of Richlands SES 8 o 1 2 ° ° a 12,795,213

Total $10,068,456

Overall Project Ranking - Decentralized Project:

umberland Plateau Planning District,

Hei Environment,

Hazards, & Communit AvgsSewer Justice - EPA

Water Affordable/ Involvemen Responsible Billasa%of ESueen

Quality, ProjectCost/ t& Management Project —‘Reportfor Total_——Estimated County Project Name Problems Connection Willingness Entity Area’s MH| Project Area Points Project Cost Buchanan Hurley 30 20 0 10 10 3 B 4,222,700 Tazewell Hilerest 20 20 5 15 8 5 B 795,200 Russell Carbo 20 20 ° 6 8 6 o 511,900 Tazewell Baptist Valley West 30 10 5 15 5 3 8 6,162,900 Russell Old Castlewood 2 10 5 6 8 4 o 773,100 Dickenson MeClure Stratton 30 10 5 10 8 2 6 3,997,200 Dickenson Nora 30 10 5 10 8 2 6 623,400 Buchanan Greenbrier 30 10 o 10 10 3 a 3,667,700 Russell Rosedale 15 20 ° 6 8 2 © 4,020,900 Russell Clinchfield 20 10 o 15 5 6 56 1,033,000 Tazewell St Clair Heights Subdivision 20 10 ° 15 5 2 2 1,518,400 Tazewell Ebenezer Subdivision 20 10 ° 5 5 2 2 4,311,200

Total $

7.3.2 LENOWISCO Planning District

A total of thirty (30) potential Centralized collection system projects were identified within the Lenowisco Planning District; twenty-two (22) of which are uncompleted from the 2005 Study and eight (8) new projects. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appendix B. An individual scoring matrix printout for each project is provided in Appendix J. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Health

Hazards, &

Water

Quality

Problems

Affordable/

Project Cost/

Connection

Regional

Effort

Equiv. # of

Residential

Connections

Served

Avg Sewer

Bill as a % of

Project

Area’s MHI

Environment.

Justice - EPA

EJScreen

Report for

Project Area

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Lee Sandy Ridge / North Jonesville 25 16 8 8 10 6 73 11,489,400

Wise Riverview Community 25 21 0 4 10 5 65 1,706,575

Wise East Stone Gap / Crackers Neck 25 16 0 10 10 2 63 18,915,325

Wise Coeburn Mountain Community 25 16 0 10 10 2 63 16,489,850

Wise South Coeburn 25 16 0 6 10 5 62 6,817,200

Lee Woodway / Hickory Flats 25 10 0 10 10 5 60 41,142,075

Wise Cranes Nest Community 25 16 0 4 10 5 60 3,977,350

Lee Dryden Heights 20 16 0 8 10 4 58 7,902,050

Wise Glamorgan Community 25 16 0 4 10 3 58 2,449,850

Wise Dorchester Community Extensions 25 10 0 8 10 3 56 12,851,150

Lee Western Lee 25 5 0 10 10 4 54 58,565,000

WIse Powell Valley Community 25 7 0 10 10 2 54 25,769,575

Wise Banner Community 25 10 0 4 10 5 54 3,759,925

Wise Indian Creek (Wise to Pound) 25 5 0 10 10 3 53 29,702,400

Scott Hiltons Community Phases 1 - 3 25 7 0 8 8 4 52 22,904,700

WIse Wildcat / Irondale 20 10 0 10 10 2 52 17,781,075

Scott Yuma Community Phases 2 - 4 25 7 0 6 8 5 51 12,493,325

Wise Crab Orchard / Dry Fork / Bull Run 25 5 0 6 10 5 51 11,303,175

Wise Upper Guest River 25 7 0 6 10 3 51 8,924,500

Wise Bold Camp 25 5 0 8 10 3 51 18,243,225

Wise South Fork Community 25 5 0 6 10 3 49 22,285,900

Wise Timberville Acres 25 5 0 4 10 5 49 4,654,975

Wise North Fork Community 25 5 0 6 10 3 49 19,085,300

Lee Cross Creek to Hickory Flats 15 5 8 4 10 6 48 5,790,200

Scott AP Carter Highway 25 5 0 6 8 4 48 10,810,475

Scott Duffield Route 871 25 5 0 4 8 5 47 5,358,925

Scott Daniel Boone Phases 2 & 3 20 7 0 6 8 5 46 13,633,750

Scott Reed Hollow Community 20 7 0 4 8 4 43 3,262,025

Scott Manville Community 20 7 0 4 8 4 43 3,137,225

Wise Hoot Owl Hollow 20 5 0 4 10 2 41 2,719,275

Total 423,925,775$

Overall Project Ranking - Centralized Projects LENOWISCO Planning District

7.3.2 LENOWISCO Planning District

project is provided in Appendix J. A summary table of the project ranking follow:

Overall Project Ranking - Centralized Projects LENOWISCO Planning District,

Health Environment, Hazards, & Equiv.ttof AvgSewer Justice EPA. Water Affordable; Residential Billasa%of E/Screen

Quality. Project Cost/ Regional Connections. Project Report for

Total Estimated

Project Name Problems Connection Effort Served —ArealsMHI ProjectArea Points Project Cost Sandy Ridge / North Jonesville 25 16 8 8 10 6 711,489,400 Riverview Community 25 2 ° 4 10 5 6 1,705,575, East Stone Gap / Crackers Neck 2% 16 o 10 10 2 618,915,325 Coeburn Mountain Community 2 16 0 10 10 2 63 16,489,850 South Coeburn 2% 16 0 6 10 5 a 6,817,200 Woodway / Hickory Flats 2 10 ° 10 10 5 60 41,102,075 Cranes Nest Community 5 16 ° 4 10 5 cy 3,977,350 Dryden Heights 2 16 o 8 10 4 58 7,902,050, Glamorgan Community 2 16 o 4 10 3 38 2,449,850, Dorchester Community Extensions 2 10 ° 2 10 3 56 12,851,150 Western tee 2 5 ° 10 10 4 54 58,565,000 Powell Valley Community 25 7 ° 10 10 2 Sa 25,769,575 Banner Community 2 10 0 4 10 5 54 3,759,925 Indian Creek (Wise to Pound) 2 5 ° 10 10 3 53 23,702,400 Hiltons Community Phases 1-3 2 7 ° 2 8 4 52 22,904,700 Wildest / Irondale 2 10 ° 10 10 2 52 17,781,075 Yura Community Phases 2-4 25 7 ° 6 8 5 St 12,493,325 Crab Orchard / ry Fork / Bull Run 25 5 o 6 10 5 st 11,303,175, Upper Guest River 2 7 ° 6 10 3 st 8,924,500 Bold Camp 2 5 ° 8 10 3 SL 18,263,225 South Fork Community 25 5 ° 6 10 3 49 22,285,900 Timberville Acres 25 5 ° 4 10 5 49 4,654,975 North Fork Community 2 5 0 6 10 3 49 19,085,300 Cross Creek to Hickory Flats 5 5 8 4 10 6 8 5,790,200 [AP Carter Highway 2 5 ° 6 8 4 48 10,810,475 Duffield Route 871 25 5 ° 4 8 5 a 5,358,925 Daniel Boone Phases 28 3 2 7 ° 6 8 5 46 13,633,750 Reed Hollow Community 2 7 0 4 8 4 a 3,262,025 ‘Manville Community 2 7 ° 4 8 4 a 3,137,225, Hoot Ow! Hollow 20 5 0 a 10 2 a 279275

Total $423,925,775.

A total of twenty-seven (27) potential Existing System Upgrade projects were identified within the Lenowisco Planning District. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appendix C. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Targeted

Project Types

& Outcomes

Environment.

Concerns -

Priority

Watersheds

Enforcement

/ Compliance

History

COLG

Composite

Fiscal Stress

Index

Potential

Bonus Points

for Towns or

Cities

Readiness

to Proceed

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Wise Town of Pound WWTP Upgrades 29 25 2 12 0 8 76 4,005,600

Wise Pound I & I Rehabilitation 25 20 2 12 0 8 67 15,000,000

Wise Appalachia Elementary WWTP to Force Main 25 20 2 12 0 2 61 1,600,000

Wise Coeburn I & I Improvements 8 20 4 12 2 8 54 7,000,000

Lee Pennington Gap WWTP Improvements 8 20 4 12 2 4 50 3,994,500

Wise Big Stone Gap SSES Improvements 8 20 2 12 2 4 48 25,000,000

Wise Norton SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 4 17 2 1 47 8,000,000

Scott Duffield WWTP Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 8 47 1,200,000

Wise Big Stone Gap WWTP Improvements 8 20 2 12 2 1 45 6,000,000

Lee Rose Hill WWTP Improvements 8 20 4 12 0 0 44 1,500,000

Wise Appalchia I & I Improvements 8 15 4 12 2 1 42 4,000,000

Lee Pennington Gap SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 4 12 2 1 42 1,500,000

Lee Rose Hill SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 4 12 0 2 41 172,700

Lee Dryden SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 4 12 0 2 41 570,000

Lee Jonesville I & I Improvements 8 15 4 12 2 0 41 2,500,000

Wise St. Paul SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 4 12 0 1 40 2,500,000

Wise C-N-W I & I Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 3,000,000

Wise St. Paul WWTP Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 2,000,000

Wise C-N-W WWTP Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 3,000,000

Scott Duffield I & I Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 2,000,000

Scott Weber City I & I Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 2,500,000

Scott Nickelsville I & I Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 1,000,000

Scott Dungannon I & I Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 500,000

Scott Holston WWTP Improvements 8 15 4 12 0 0 39 2,500,000

Scott Dungannon WWTP Improvements 8 15 2 12 2 0 39 500,000

Scott Nickelsville Sewage Pump Station Improvements 8 15 2 12 0 1 38 500,000

Scott Gate City I & I Improvements 8 10 4 12 2 1 37 2,500,000

Total 104,542,800$

Overall Project Ranking - Existing System Upgrade Projects LENOWISCO Planning District

Within the Lenowisco Planning District, eight (8) potential decentralized community wastewater projects were identified; one of which was uncompleted from the 2005 Study and seven (7) new projects. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Health

Hazards, &

Water

Quality

Problems

Affordable/

Project Cost/

Connection

Community

Involvemen

t &

Willingness

Responsible

Management

Entity

Avg Sewer

Bill as a % of

Project

Area’s MHI

Environment.

Justice - EPA

EJScreen

Report for

Project Area

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Lee Stone Creek 20 20 0 15 8 6 69 1,774,500

Wise Honey Branch 25 20 0 10 5 5 65 836,000

Wise Dunbar 25 20 5 0 8 3 61 928,900

Wise Russell Creek 20 20 0 10 5 4 59 477,800

Lee Keokee 20 10 0 15 10 3 58 3,559,100

Scott Natural Tunnel Parkway 30 10 0 5 8 5 58 596,000

Wise Little League Road 15 10 5 10 8 5 53 503,000

Scott Spring Valley Subdivision 30 10 0 0 5 4 49 682,200

Total 9,357,500$

Overall Project Ranking - Decentralized Projects - LENOWISCO Planning District

A total of twenty-seven (27) potential Existing System Upgrade projects were identified within the Lenowisco C.Asummary table of the project

Planning District. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appens

ranking follows:

Overall Project Ranking - Existing System Upgrade Projects LENOWISCO Planning District

Environment. OLS, potential Targeted Concerns Enforcement Composite, Bonus Points Project Types Ponty {Compliance FiscalSuess. fortownsor Readiness Total Estimated county ct Nam ‘Outcomes Watersheds Histo Index Gest Proewed Points Project Cost Wise Town of Pound WWTP Upgrades Fa % 2 2 ° 8 76 $005,600 Wise Pound 61 Rehabilitation 2s 20 2 2 ° 8 s 15000000 Wise Appalachia Elementary WWTP to Fore Main 2s 20 2 2 ° 2 63,600,000 Wise Coeburn | &t Improvements 8 20 4 2 2 8 54 7,000,000 lee Pennington Gap WWTP improvements 8 20 4 2 2 4 so 3.954500 Wise Big Stone Gap 8S improvements 8 20 2 2 2 4 4825000000 Wise Norton SSES Rehabilitation 8 1s ‘ ” 2 1 47 000000 Scott Outfield WWTP Improvements 8 as ‘ 2 ° a «3200000 Wise Big Stone Gap WWTP improvements in 20 2 2 2 1 4 onno00 Lee Rose Hill WT Improvements 8 20 4 2 ° ° 4 san00 Wise Appalchia& Improvements 8 ’s ‘ 2 2 1 2 4000000 lee Pennington Gap 3585 Rehabilitation 8 as ‘ 2 2 1 2 ysooo00 lee Rose Hill SSS Rehabilitation 8 as ‘ 2 ° 2 a 172,700 lee Dryden SSES Rehabilitation 8 48 4 2 ° 2 a 70.000 lee Jonesville & improvements 8 5 4 2 2 ° 2500000 Wise st. Paul SES Rehabilitation 8 4 ‘ 2 ° 1 40 2sanm00 Wise CNAWI& I Improvements 8 as ‘ 2 ° ° 293000000 Wise St. Paul WWTP Improvements 8 as ‘ 2 ° ° 392000000 Wise C:N.W WWTP improvements a as 4 2 ° ° 393,000,000 Scott Outfield & improvements 8 5 4 2 ° ° 392,000,000 Scott Weber Cy & I Improvements 8 5 4 2 ° ° 39 _2500,000 Scott Nickelsville 1 & Improvements 8 4s ‘ 2 ° ° 39100000 Scott Dungsnnon | Improvements 8 as ‘ 2 ° ° x» ‘00.00 Scott Holston WWTP improvements a 4s 4 2 ° ° 392500000 Scott Dungsnnon WAP Improvements 8 45 2 2 2 ° x» ‘00.00 Scott Nickesvle Sewage Pump Station Improvements 6 2 2 ° 1 38 500,000, Scott Gate City! &l Improvements 8 10 ‘ 2 2 1 37 —2500,000 Total $104582,200 Within the Lenowisco Planning District, eight (8) potential decentralized community wastewater projects were identified; one of which was uncompleted from the 2005 Study and seven (7) new projects. Asummary table of the project ranking follows: Overall Project Ranking - Decentralized Projects - LENOWISCO Planning District Health Environment. Hazards, & Community AvgSewer Justice - EPA Water Affordable/ involvemen Responsible Sillasa%et Screen Quality, ProjectCost/ —£& Management Project Reportfor Total ‘Estimated county Project Name Problems Connection Willingness Entity Area’sMHI Project Area Points Project Cost lee Stone Creek 20 20 ° 15 8 6 cy 4.74500 Wise Honey ranch 25 20 ° 10 5 5 6 836,000 Wise Dunbar 25 20 5 ° 8 3 on 928,900 Wise Russell Creek 20 20 ° 10 5 4 59 47,300 lee Keokee 20 10 ° 15 10 3 58 3,559,100 Scott Natural Tunnel Parkway 30 20 ° 5 8 5 58 96,000 Wise Little League Road 15 20 5 10 8 s 53 03,000 Scott Spring Valley Subdivision 30 10 ° ° 5 4 « 82,200

Total $ 9,357,500

7.3.3 Mount Rogers Planning District

A total of thirty-three (33) potential Centralized collection system projects were identified within the Mount Rogers Planning District; thirty-one (31) of which are uncompleted from the 2005 Study and two (2) new projects. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appendix B. An individual scoring matrix printout for each project is provided in Appendix J. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Health

Hazards, &

Water

Quality

Problems

Affordable/

Project Cost/

Connection

Regional

Effort

Equiv. # of

Residential

Connections

Served

Avg Sewer

Bill as a % of

Project

Area’s MHI

Environment.

Justice - EPA

EJScreen

Report for

Project Area

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Smyth Pleasant Heights / Midway 25 16 8 6 5 5 65 5,864,393

Washington Benhams Road 20 16 0 10 8 5 59 12,595,671

Smyth Watson Gap / North Holston 25 10 8 6 5 5 59 9,230,945

Washington Mock Hollow 25 16 0 4 8 4 57 686,520

Smyth Currin Valley 25 16 0 6 5 5 57 4,234,039

Washington Lee Highway 25 5 8 6 8 4 56 33,153,396

Washington East Central 25 7 0 10 8 5 55 52,415,738

Washington Larwood 20 16 0 6 8 5 55 4,952,343

Washington High Meadows 20 16 0 6 8 4 54 6,933,150

Washington Clinchburg 25 10 0 6 8 4 53 5,046,008

Washington Buchanan Road 25 5 0 4 8 8 50 2,153,174

Grayson Stevens Creek / Eagle Bottom 20 7 8 8 2 5 50 12,201,410

Smyth Groseclose 25 10 0 8 5 2 50 9,733,248

Grayson Providence 20 5 8 8 2 5 48 19,465,550

Smyth Hungry Mother 25 10 0 4 5 4 48 2,245,534

Washington Old Mill Road 25 5 0 4 8 5 47 3,018,540

Washington Spoon Gap 25 5 0 4 8 4 46 2,742,852

Washington Rush Creek 25 5 0 4 8 2 44 3,140,200

Bland Rocky Gap 25 7 0 4 5 2 43 6,691,815

Bland Bland 20 7 0 8 5 2 42 17,538,625

Washington Seven Springs 20 5 0 4 8 5 42 2,879,429

Washington Wyndale 0 16 8 4 8 4 40 1,935,056

Grayson Independence North/South 0 21 0 6 5 4 36 4,050,020

Wythe Wytheville East 20 5 0 4 0 6 35 2,506,985

Wythe Route 21 South 20 5 0 4 0 5 34 7,741,890

Carroll Cana Sewer 0 5 8 10 5 4 32 45,867,250

Grayson Fairview 0 5 8 10 5 3 31 42,060,460

Smyth Middle Fork 0 7 8 4 5 4 28 5,299,450

Washington Damascus Area 0 5 0 4 8 3 20 1,047,559

Wythe Cripple Creek 0 5 0 4 0 8 17 6,994,000

Grayson Elk Creek 0 5 0 4 5 3 17 11,822,005

Wythe Barren Springs 0 7 0 6 0 2 15 11,642,605

Wythe Poplar Camp, Foster Falls 0 5 0 6 0 3 14 13,818,220

Total 371,708,080$

Overall Project Ranking - Centralized Projects Mount Rogers Planning District

7.3.3 Mount Rogers Planning District

Overall Project Ranking - Centralized Projects Mount Rogers Planning District

Health Environment, Hazards, & Eaulv.#of AvgSewer Justice - EPA Water Affordable; Residential Billasa%of Screen Quality Project Cost/ Regional Connections Project. Reportfor Total Estimated County ject Name Problems Connection Effort Served Area’s MMI_ Project Area Points Project Cost Smyth Pleasant Heights / Midway 25 6 8 6 5 5 6 5,854,393 Washington Benhams Road 20 6 0 10 8 5 Ey 12,595,671 ‘Smyth Watson Gap / North Holston 3 10 8 6 5 5 59 9,230,945, Washington Mock Hollow 2 16 o 4 8 4 7 686,520, Smyth Curtin Valley 2 16 ° 6 5 5 7 4,234,039 Washington Lee Highway 25 5 8 6 8 4 56 33,153,396, Washington East Central 25 7 ° 10 8 5 55 52,415,738 Washington Larwood 20 16 0 6 8 5 55 4,952,343, Washington High Meadows 20 16 o 6 8 4 54 6,933,150, Washington Clinchburg 2 10 o 6 8 4 33 5,046,008 Washington Buchanan Road 2 5 ° 4 8 a so 2,153,174 Grayson _ Stevens Creek / Eagle Bottom 20 7 8 8 2 5 so 12,201,410 Smyth — Groseclose 25 10 ° 8 5 2 50 9,733,248 Grayson Providence 20 5 8 8 2 5 8 19,465,550 Smyth Hungry Mother 25 10 o 4 5 4 8 2,285,538 Washington Old Mill Road ca 5 ° 4 8 5 a7 3,018,540 Washington Spoon Gap 2 5 ° 4 8 4 46 2,742,852 Washington Rush Creek 25 5 ° 4 8 2 a 3,140,200 Bland Rocky Gap 5 7 0 4 5 2 8 6,691,815, Bland Bland 20 7 ° 8 5 2 2 17,538,625 Washington Seven Springs 20 5 o 4 8 5 2 2,879,409 Washington Wyndale ° 16 8 4 8 4 40 1925,056 Grayson Independence North/South ° 2 ° 6 5 4 36 4,050,020 wythe Wytheville East 20 5 ° 4 ° 6 35 2,506,985 wythe Route 21South 20 5 ° 4 ° 5 34 7,741,890 Carroll Cana Sewer ° 5 8 10 5 4 2 45,867,250, Grayson Fairview ° 5 8 10 5 3 31 42,060,460 ‘Smyth Middle Fork ° 7 8 4 8 4 Fy 5,299,450 Washington Damascus Area ° 5 ° 4 8 3 20 1,007,559 wythe Cripple Creek ° 5 ° 4 ° a ” 6,994,000 Grayson elk Creek ° 5 ° 4 5 3 v7 13,822,005 Wythe Barren Springs ° 7 0 6 ° 2 5 1,682,605 Wythe Poplar Camp, Foster Falls ° 5 o 6 ° 3 1“ 13,818,220

Total $371,708,080

A total of thirty-two (32) potential Existing System Upgrade projects were identified within the Mount Rogers Planning District. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appendix C. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Targeted

Project Types

& Outcomes

Environment.

Concerns -

Priority

Watersheds

Enforcement

/ Compliance

History

COLG

Composite

Fiscal Stress

Index

Potential

Bonus Points

for Towns or

Cities

Readiness

to Proceed

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Bristol City Beaver Creek Sewer Interceptor Rehabilitation 33 15 2 17 4 8 79 9,532,000

Bristol City Beaver Creek Flow Equalization Basin 33 15 2 17 4 8 79 7,294,000

Bristol City BC-1568 Sewer System Rehabilitation Project 33 15 2 17 4 2 73 5,253,543

Bristol City BC-1301 Sewer System Rehabilitation Project 33 15 2 17 4 0 71 2,867,800

Bristol City Beaver Creek Interceptor Rehabilitation Phase 2 33 15 2 17 4 0 71 15,000,000

Bristol City Little Creek Interceptor Improvements Project 25 15 1 17 4 0 62 3,250,000

Bristol City Sinking Creek Rehabilitation Project 16 15 1 17 4 4 57 2,867,800

Bristol City Gate City Highway Rehabilitation Project 16 15 1 17 4 4 57 1,526,850

Carroll I-77 Exit 1 Sewer System Improvements 25 10 2 12 0 1 50 2,632,033

Smyth Marion SSES Rehabilitation 17 15 1 12 4 1 50 1,300,488

Wythe Rural Retreat SSES Rehabilitation 17 15 1 12 4 1 50 430,224

Wythe Wytheville SSES Rehabilitation 17 15 1 12 4 1 50 1,967,137

Smyth Staley Creek SSES Rehabilitation 17 15 1 12 0 1 46 500,000

Smyth Saltville Phase 2 SSES Rehabilitation 17 15 1 12 0 1 46 1,476,000

Bland Bastian SSES Rehabilitation 17 15 1 12 0 1 46 810,000

Galax City Galax Collection System I/I Reductions 8 15 1 17 4 0 45 10,875,000

Washington Abingdon Phase 1 Sewer System Improvements 16 15 4 5 2 2 44 3,314,000

Washington Abingdon Phase 2 Sewer System Improvements 16 15 4 5 2 2 44 9,502,000

Smyth Chilhowie System Wide Sewer Improvements 8 15 4 12 4 1 44 3,200,000

Washington Abingdon - Walden Road Sewer Improvements 8 15 4 5 2 8 42 2,663,000

Washington Abingdon Phase 3 Sewer System Improvements 16 15 4 5 2 0 42 5,000,000

Washington Abingdon Phase 4 Sewer System Improvements 16 15 4 5 2 0 42 5,000,000

Washington Abingdon Phase 5 Sewer System Improvements 16 15 4 5 2 0 42 10,000,000

Wythe Fort Chiswell WWTP Expansion 8 15 1 12 0 4 40 8,185,000

Wythe Rural Retreat WWTP Expansion 8 15 1 12 4 0 40 2,500,000

Smyth Saltville WWTP Improvements 8 15 1 12 4 0 40 2,500,000

Grayson Independence Sewer Line CIPP & Manhole Rehab 8 15 1 12 0 1 37 1,010,840

Wythe Max Meadows SSES Rehabilitation 8 15 1 12 0 1 37 1,209,000

Washington Abingdon - Wolf Creek WRF Improvements 8 15 4 5 2 0 34 5,000,000

Washington Abingdon - Sewer Lift Station Improvements 8 15 4 5 2 0 34 3,000,000

Grayson Fries Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements 8 10 1 12 2 1 34 1,471,000

Carroll Town of Hillsville - SSES 8 0 1 12 4 1 26 5,600,000

Total 136,737,715$

Overall Project Ranking - Existing System Upgrades Projects Mount Rogers Planning District

Within the Mount Rogers Planning District, there were five (5) potential decentralized community wastewater projects identified; three (3) of which are uncompleted from the 2005 Study and two (2) new projects. A summary table of the project ranking follows:

County Project Name

Health

Hazards, &

Water

Quality

Problems

Affordable/

Project Cost/

Connection

Community

Involvemen

t &

Willingness

Responsible

Management

Entity

Avg Sewer

Bill as a % of

Project

Area’s MHI

Environment.

Justice - EPA

EJScreen

Report for

Project Area

Total

Points

Estimated

Project Cost

Smyth St. Clairs Creek 30 20 0 0 8 3 61 7,067,600

Wythe Ivanhoe 30 10 0 0 8 4 52 6,812,800

Washington Clinchburg 20 10 0 10 5 5 50 1,884,800

Wythe Speedwell 20 20 0 0 5 3 48 3,364,700

Wythe Crockett 30 10 0 0 5 2 47 1,871,400

Total 21,001,300$

Overall Project Ranking - Decentralized Projects - Mount Rogers Planning District

Atotal of thirty-two (32) potential Existing System Upgrade projects were identified within the Mount Rogers

Planning District. Descriptions of these projects are provided in Appen:

ranking follows:

county Bristol city isto city Bristol Cty Bristol City isto city Bristol city isto ity Beistol Cty Ccarrall smyth wythe Wythe smth smyth Bland Galax city Washington Washington smth Washington washington Washington Washington Wythe Wythe smth Grayson wythe washington Washington Geayson Carrell

Overall Project Ranking - Existing System Upgrades Projects Mount Rogers Planning District

Project Name Besver Creek Sewer Interceptor Rehabilitation ‘Beaver Creek Flow Equalization sin

18-1868 Sewer System Rehabilitation Project {8.1201 Sewer System Rehabilitation Project ‘Beaver Creek Interceptor Rehabilitation Phase 2 tte Creek interceptorimproverents Project Sinking Creek Rehabilitation Project

Gate City Highway Rehabilitation Project

1-77 xi Sewer System improvernents

Marion SSS Rehabilitation

Rural Retreat 55 Rehabilitation

\Wythevile 85 Rehabilitation

Staley Creek SSES Rehabilitation

Saltll Phase 2SSES Rehabilitation fastlanSSES Rehabilitation

Galax collection system Reductions ‘Abingdon Phase 1 Sewer System improvements ‘Abingdon Phase 2Sewer ystem improvements Chihowie System Wide Sewer improvements ‘Abingdon - Walden Road Sewer Improvements ‘Abingdon Phase 3Sewer System improvements ‘Abingdon Phase 4Sewer System Improvements ‘Abingdon Phase SSewer System improvements Fort Chiswell WWTP Expansion

Rural Retreat WWTP Expansion

Saltlle WWTP improvements

Independence Sewer Line CIPP& Manhole Rehab Max Meadows SSES Rehabilitation

‘Abingdon - Wolf Creek WRF Improvements ‘Abingdon -Sewer ft Station Improvements Fries Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Townof wlll SSES

2 2 2 2 5 16 16 2% w v v y

5 16 16

8 16 36

Targeted Project Types ROutcomes

rg 1s 1s 1s 1s 5 0 as 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 5 1s 1s 1s 1s 0 °

Concerns Priory. Motersheds

Enforcement

ra 7 a a ry 2 2 2 R 2 ” 5 2 5 5 s 2 2 2 2 5 rey 2

Composite. Bonus Points Compliance fecal Stress forTownsor Readiness

History Index

tie n

C.Asummary table of the project

Readiness Total fstimated. oproceed points Project cost 8 739532000 8 737294000 2 5253583 a nm 2.867,200 a 350000 4 72,867,800 4 Ss? 1,526850 1 502632038 a so nage a 50 ‘0,224 a so 1.967137 a 461476000 a 46 "10,000 a 45 10875.000 2 483316000 2 4902000 a 463200000 8 22663000 a 2 _-soq0000 0 2 s0q00000 4 08185000 a 0 2.500.000 ° 0 2scoc00 1 371010840 a a7 208000 a 3.000000 a ary a 26 5600.00 Toul $136,757.15,

county ‘Smyth, wythe

Washington wythe wythe

Overall Project Ranking - Decentralized Projects - Mount Rogers Planning District

Health Environment Hazards, & Communit AvgSewer Justice - EPA Water Affordable/ Involvemen Responsible. Billasa%of ElScreen Quality ProjectCost/ t& Management Project ‘Reportfor Total Estimated Project Name Problems Connection Willingness Entity Areas MHI_ ProjectArea Points Project Cost St. Clas Creek 30 20 ° 0 8 3 6 7,067,600 Ivanhoe 20 10 ° ° 8 4 82 6,812,800 Clinchbure 2 10 o 10 5 5 50 1,884,800 Speedwell 2 20 ° ° 5 3 8 3,368,700, Crockett 30 10 ° ° 5 2 a 14871,400, Total $21,001,300

7.4 Project Prioritization

Based on the existing needs and future sewer demands presented in this report, there is a significant need for sanitary sewer collection and treatment within the study area over the 10-year planning horizon. A need has been identified to score/rank the projects in order to maximize the benefits to the area.

7.4.1 Scoring Criteria

Scoring criteria for centralized sewer projects, decentralized sewer projects, and existing wastewater collection or treatment system upgrades type projects have been developed in order to assist in the prioritization of the proposed projects identified in this study.

For centralized sewer projects, these criteria were used in order to evaluate each project with respect to eliminating health hazards & water quality problems, affordability/cost per equivalent residential connection, regionalization, number of equivalent customers served, average residential customer’s annual sewer bill as a percentage of the project area’s median household income, and environmental justice.

For decentralized sewer projects, these criteria were used in order to evaluate each project with respect to eliminating health hazards & water quality problems, affordability/cost per equivalent residential connection, community involvement & willingness to participate, responsible management entity considerations for ownership and operation, average residential customer’s annual sewer bill as a percentage of the project area’s median household income, and environmental justice.

For existing wastewater collection or treatment system upgrades type projects, these criteria were used in order to evaluate each project with respect to targeted project types/outcomes, environmental concerns - priority watersheds, environmental concerns – enforcement/ compliance history, commission on local government composite fiscal stress index ranking, potential bonus points for towns or cities, and readiness to proceed with project.

Each criterion was assigned a point value, which was used to measure how well a proposed project meets and/or addresses the intent of the criteria. A project can receive a maximum of 100 points if it meets or addresses all of the ranking criteria. Weighting factors are built into each of the evaluation criteria based on their relative importance. The criteria were selected based on input from the Project Management Team and from funding agencies existing methodologies for evaluating projects. The project ranking criteria utilized for this Study differs from the criteria used in the 2005 Study.

7.4.2 Centralized Sewer Projects

A 100-point project ranking scale was developed with input from the Study stakeholders. The ranking scale was modified from that used in the 2005 Study to place higher emphases on health hazards and water quality, affordability, regionalization, and environmental justice and less emphasis on growth potential.

Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 Points maximum)

The criteria for these will be evaluated based on the following point system:

• Address a severe or urgent public health hazard as declared by VDH = 30 points

• Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in Watershed of 303(d) Impaired Water = 25 points

• Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired = 20 points

• Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized System = 15 points

• Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized System = 15 points

7.4 Project Prioritization

Based on the existing needs and future sewer demands presented in this report, there is a significant need for sanitary sewer collection and treatment within the study area over the 10-year planning horizon. Aneed has been identified to score/rank the projects in order to maximize the benefits to the area.

7.4.1 Scoring Criteria

For centralized sewer projects, these criteria were used in order to evaluate each project with respect to eliminating health hazards & water quality problems, affordability/cost per equivalent residential connection, regionalization, number of equivalent customers served, average residential customer’s annual sewer bill asa percentage of the project area’s median household income, and environmental justice.

For existing wastewater collection or treatment system upgrades type projects, these criteria were used in order to evaluate each project with respect to targeted project types/outcomes, environmental concerns - priority watersheds, environmental concerns — enforcement/ compliance history, commission on local government composite fiscal stress index ranking, potential bonus points for towns or cities, and readiness to proceed with project.

7.4.2 Centralized Sewer Projects

‘A. 100-point project ranking scale was developed with input from the Study stakeholders. The ranking scale ‘was modified from that used in the 2005 Study to place higher emphases on health hazards and water quality, affordability, regionalization, and environmental justice and less emphasis on growth potential.

Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 Points maximum,

The criteria for these will be evaluated based on the following point system:

‘* Address a severe or urgent public health hazard as declared by VDH = 30 points ‘* Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in Watershed of 303(d) Impaired Wate ‘* Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired ‘* Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized System = 15 points

‘* Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized System = 15 points

Affordability/Project Implementation Cost per Equivalent Residential Connection (25 points)

The total present worth of the project (including construction, related and annual O&M costs) will be evaluated with respect to the potential number of connections that will be served by the proposed project. The lower the cost per connection the more points the project will receive under these criteria.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• < $20,000 per connection = 25 points

• $20,000 - $30,000 per connection = 21 points

• $30,000 - $45,000 per connection = 16 points

• $45,000 - $60,000 per connection = 10 points

• $60,000 - $75,000 per connection = 7 points

• > $75,000 per connection = 5 points

Regionalization (15 points maximum)

Regionalization of the project will be evaluated based on the number of localities/utility providers involved in each project. The more localities/utility providers involved in a project the more points awarded.

The criteria shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers = 15 points

• Project Involves Three or More Localities / Utility Providers = 12 points

• Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers = 8 points

Number of Equivalent Customers Served by the Project (10 points maximum)

The total number of equivalent customers served by the project will be evaluated for each project. Since one of the objectives of this study is to serve new customers, projects that serve more customers will receive more points.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• > 300 equivalent connections = 10 points

• 200 - 300 equivalent connections = 8 points

• 100 – 200 equivalent connections = 6 points

• < 100 equivalent connections = 4 points

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum)

The annual sewer bill based on 4,200 gallon per month as a percentage of a project area’s median household income is used to determine the capability of a project to produce revenue for the municipality. The higher the percentage the more points awarded.

Affordability/Project Implementation Cost per Equivalent Residential Connection (25 points,

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

‘* <$20,000 per connection = 25 points ‘* $20,000 - $30,000 per connection = 21 points ‘* $30,000 - $45,000 per connection = 16 points ‘* $45,000 - $60,000 per connection = 10 points ‘* $60,000 - $75,000 per connection = 7 points ‘* > $75,000 per connection = Sp

Regionalization (15 points ma»

umn)

‘* Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers = 15 points

‘© Project Involves Three or More Localities / Utility Providers = 12 points

‘* Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers = 8 points

‘Number of Equivalent Customers Served by the Project (10 points maximum)

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point syster

300 equivalent connections = 10 points ‘* 200-300 equivalent connections = 8 points ‘* 100-200 equivalent connections = 6 points
<100 equivalent connections = 4 points

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum}

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• > 2.0 % of Median Household Income = 10 points

• 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income = 8 points

• 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income = 5 points

• 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income = 2 points

Environmental Justice – EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum)The USEPA’s EJScreen report is used to determine pollution & source indexes, and socioeconomic indicators for a project area. The more severe the pollution & source index and Socioeconomic indicators are for a project area the more points will be awarded for that project.

The criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system based upon the project area’s Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution and Source Indexes and the 8 Socioeconomic Indicators:

• Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 = 5 points

• Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 = 4 points

• Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 – 50 = 2 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 = 5 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 – 70 = 4 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 – 60 = 3 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 – 50 = 2 points

7.4.3 Decentralized Sewer Projects

A 100-point project ranking scale was developed with input from the Study stakeholders. The ranking scale was modified from that used in the 2005 Study to place higher emphases on affordability, regionalization, and environmental justice and less emphasis on community involvement.

Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum)

The criteria for these will be evaluated based on the following point system:

• Address a severe or urgent public health hazard as declared by VDH = 30 points

• Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in Watershed of 303(d) Impaired Water = 25 points

• Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired = 20 points

• Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Decentralized System = 15 points

• Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized System = 15 points

Affordability/Project Implementation Cost per Equivalent Residential Connection (25 points maximum)

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system: ‘* > 2.0% of Median Household income = 10 points ‘+ 15% - 2.0% of Median Household Income = 8 points

1.0% - 1.5 % of Median Household Income = 5 points © 0.75 %- 1.0 % of Median Household Incom

= 2 points

Environmental Justice ~ EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum)The USEPA’s EJScreen report is used to determine pollution & source indexes, and socioeconomic indicators for a project area. The more severe the pollution & source index and Socioeconomic indicators are for a project area the more points will be awarded for that project.

‘+ Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 = 5 points

‘+ Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 = 4 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 ~ 50 = 2 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 = 5 points

‘* Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 = 4 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 = 3 points

‘+ Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 = 2 points

7.4.3. Decentralized Sewer Projects

‘A 100-point project ranking scale was developed with input from the Study stakeholders. The ranking scale was modified from that used in the 2005 Study to place higher emphases on affordability, regionalization, and environmental justice and less emphasis on community involvement.

Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum, The criteria for these will be evaluated based on the following point system: ‘* Address a severe or urgent public health hazard as declared by VDH = 30 points ‘* Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in Watershed of 303(d) Impaired Water = 25 points ‘* Eliminates Failing Septics or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired = 20 points ‘* Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Decentralized System = 15 points

Affordability/Project Implementation Cost per Equivalent Residential Connection (25 points maximum)

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• < $20,000 per connection = 25 points

• $20,000 - $30,000 per connection = 20 points

• $30,000 - $50,000 per connection = 10 points

• > $50,000 per connection = 5 points

Community Involvement & Willingness to Participate (10 points maximum)

Points will be awarded for projects that have watershed group activities, citizen initiatives, or both.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• Watershed Group Activities (Water Quality Monitoring, Surveys, User Agreements) = 5 points

• Citizen Initiatives (Community Meetings, Petitions to Utility Providers) = 5 points

• Both Water Quality Activities & Citizen Initiatives = 10 points

Responsible Management Entity (RME) Considerations for Ownership and Operation (15 points maximum)Utility willingness considers whether a proposed project has either an existing RME with prior experience owning and operating a de-centralized system, or a provided with knowledge of decentralized systems and willing to be the RME.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• Existing RME with Experience Owning and Operating a Decentralized System = 15 points

• Existing Public Utility Provider Willing to be the RME = 10 points

• Availability of a Privately Owned Company with Operating Experience = 10 points

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum)

The annual sewer bill as a percentage of a project area’s median household income is used to determine the capability of a project to produce revenue for the municipality. The higher the percentage the more points awarded.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• > 2.0 % of Median Household Income = 10 points

• 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income = 8 points

• 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income = 5 points

• 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income = 2 points

Environmental Justice – EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum)

The EJScreen report is used to determine pollution & source indexes, and socioeconomic indicators for a project area. The more severe the pollution & source index and Socioeconomic indicators are for a project area the more points will be awarded for that project.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

<$20,000 per connection = 25 points ‘* $20,000 - $30,000 per connection = 20 points ‘* $30,000 - $50,000 per connection = 10 points ‘* > $50,000 per connection = 5 points

Community Involvement & Willingness to Participate (10 points maximum,

Points will be awarded for projects that have watershed group activities, citizen initiatives, or both.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

‘+ Watershed Group Activities (Water Quality Monitoring, Surveys, User Agreements) = 5 points © Citizen Initi

ives (Community Meetings, Petitions to Utility Providers) = 5 points

‘* Both Water Quality Activities & Citizen Initiatives = 10 points

Responsible Management Entity (RME) Considerations for Ownership and Operation (15 points

maximum)Utility willingness considers whether a proposed project has either an existing RME with prior experience owning and operating a de-centralized system, or a provided with knowledge of decentralized systems and willing to be the RME.

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

‘* Existing RME with Experience Owning and Operating a Decentralized System ‘© Existing Public Utility Provider Willing to be the RM

5 points

10 points ‘* Availability of a Privately Owned Company with Operating Experience = 10 points

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum}

This criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system: ‘* > 2.0% of Median Household Income = 10 points

15% - 2.0% of Median Household Income = 8 points
1.0%- 1.5 % of Median Household Income = 5 points
0.75 %- 1.0 % of Median Household Income = 2 points

Environmental Justice ~ EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum|

The ElScreen report is used to determine pollution & source indexes, and socioeconomic indicators for a project area. The more severe the pollution & source index and Socioeconomic indicators are for a project area the more points will be awarded for that project.

The criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system:

• Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 = 5 points

• Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 = 4 points

• Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 = 3 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 = 5 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 – 70 = 4 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 – 60 = 3 points

• Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 – 50 = 2 points

7.4.4 Existing Wastewater Collection Or Treatment System Upgrades Type Project

A 100-point project ranking scale was utilized for this new project category that wasn’t included in the 2005 Study. The scoring criteria mirrors DEQ’s CWSRF project scoring system, except that the point criteria were pro-rated to equate to a 100-point scale instead of the 600-point CWSRF scale.

Targeted Project Types/Outcomes (42 points maximum)

The outcome of projects are based on several criteria that look to resolve DEQ enforcement or general system concerns.

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

• Needed to Meet New More Stringent Water Quality Standards of Regulations = 33 points

• Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by VDH = 29 points

• Addresses Problems (Not Growth Related) & Has Been Referred to DEQ Enforcement = 25 points

• Addresses Potential Health Concerns Not Declared by VDH to Be Health Hazards = 17 points

• Addresses Problems (Growth Related) & Has Been Referred to DEQ Enforcement = 17 points

• Project to Rehabilitate, Refurbish, or Expand Existing Wastewater Facilities = 8 points

• Sewer Service Extensions to Serve Previously Unsewered Areas = 4 points

• Bonus Points for Projects Using Innovative Technologies to Address the Problems = 8 points

Environmental Concerns – Priority Watersheds (25 points maximum)

The reduction of environmental concerns for a watershed associated with a project will award a given number of points based on the characteristics of the watershed and the pollution source reduced.

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

• Reduces of a Dominant/Exclusive Pollution Source of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water = 25 points

• Reduces of a Moderate Pollution Source of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water = 20 points

• Reduces of a Minor Pollution Source of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water = 15 points

• Major Reduction of a Pollution Source of a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired = 20 points

• Minor Reduction of a Pollution Source of a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired = 10 points

Environmental Concerns – Enforcement / Compliance History (4 points maximum)

The ability of a municipality to address DEQ enforcement action will be awarded additional points for improvement projects.

The criterion shall be evaluated in accordance with the following point system: ‘* Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 = 5 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 = 4 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 = 3 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 = 5 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 = 4 points ‘* Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 = 3 points ‘+ Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 = 2 points

7.4.4 Existing Wastewater Collection Or Treatment System Upgrades Type Project

‘A.100-point project ranking scale was utilized for this new project category that wasn’t included in the 2005 Study. The scoring criteria mirrors DEQ’s CWSRF project scoring system, except that the point criteria were pro-rated to equate to a 100-point scale instead of the 600-point CWSRF scale.

Targeted Project Types/Outcomes (42 points maximum|

The outcome of projects are based on several criteria that look to resolve DEQ enforcement or general system concerns

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

‘+ Needed to Meet New More Stringent Water Quality Standards of Regulations = 33 points ‘* Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by VDH = 29 points

‘* Addresses Problems (Not Growth Related) & Has Been Referred to DEQ Enforcement = 25 points ‘* Addresses Potential Health Concerns Not Declared by VDH to Be Health Hazards = 17 points

‘* Addresses Problems (Growth Related) & Has Been Referred to DEQ Enforcement = 17 points

‘* Project to Rehabilitate, Refurbish, or Expand Existing Wastewater Faci ‘© Sewer Service Extensions to Serve Previously Unsewered Areas = 4 points ‘* Bonus Points for Projects Using Innovative Technologies to Address the Problems = 8 points

points

Environmental Concerns ~ Priority Watersheds (25 points maximum|

The reduction of environmental concerns for a watershed associated with a project will award a given number of points based on the characteristics of the watershed and the pollution source reduced

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

Reduces of a Dominant/Exclusive Pollution Source of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water = 25 points Reduces of a Moderate Pollution Source of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water = 20 points

Reduces of a Minor Pollution Source of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water = 15 points

‘* Major Reduction of a Pollution Source of a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired = 20 points

Minor Reduction of a Pollution Source of a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired = 10 points

Environmental Concerns ~ Enforcement / Compliance History (4 points maximum)

The ability of a municipality to address DEQ enforcement action will be awarded additional points for improvement projects.

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

• System Has No Recent (Last 12 Months) NOV’s or Active Enforcement Actions = 4 points

• System Demonstrates Efforts Taken to Address DEQ Enforcement Action = 2 points

• System Demonstrates Physical Improvements Addressing Problems Resulting in NOVs = 2 points

• Efforts Made to Improve O&M Practices, Increase Revenues, Restrict Flows = 1 points

Commission on Local Government Composite Fiscal Stress Index Ranking (17 points maximum)

The commission on local government releases a composite stress index every year that evaluates every county in the state of Virginia. The higher the classification of a county is the more points awarded to that project.

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

• Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Index is Classified as “High” = 17 points

• Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Index is Classified as “Above Average” = 12 points

• Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Index is Classified as “Below Average” = 5 points

• Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Index is Classified as “Low” = 0 points

Potential Bonus Points for Towns or Cities (4 points maximum)

The project will be awarded additional points for rate increases or significant loss of industry or tax base.

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

• Recent (Last 5 Years) Significant User Rate Increases = 2 points

• Recent (Last 5 Years) Tax Rate Increase for Capital Improvements = 2 points

• Recent (Last 5 Years) Significant Loss of Industry or Tax Base and/or Loss of Revenues = 2 points

Readiness to Proceed with Project (8 points maximum) The status of plans, specifications, and preliminary engineering reports for a given project will award the project additional points. The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

• Plans and Specifications Completed and All Regulatory Permits Secured = 8 points

• Plans and Specifications Completed and Reviewed by Regulatory Agencies = 6 points

• Plans and Specifications Prepared and Expected to be Complete within 4 Months = 4 points

• Plans and Specifications Being Prepared for Project = 2 points

• Preliminary Engineering Report for Project Completed = 1 point

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

‘+ System Has No Recent (Last 12 Months) NOV’s or Active Enforcement Actions = 4 points ‘© system Demonstrates Efforts Taken to Address DEQ Enforcement Action = 2 points ‘* System Demonstrates Physical Improvements Addressing Problems Resulting in NOVs

points

Efforts Made to Improve O&M Practices, Increase Revenues, Restrict Flows = 1 points

Commission on Local Government Composite Fiscal Stress Index Ranking (17 points maximum)

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Index is Classified as “High” = 17 points

Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Index is Classified as “Above Average” = 12 points

‘© Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Inde»

Classified as “Below Average” = 5 points

Locality’s Most Recent Composite Stress Index is Classified as “Low” = 0 points

Potential Bonus Points for Towns or Cities (4 points maximum)

The project will be awarded additional points for rate increases or significant loss of industry or tax base.

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

Recent (Last 5 Years) Significant User Rate Increases = 2 points ‘© Recent (Last 5 Years) Tax Rate Increase for Capital Improvements = 2 points ‘Recent (Last 5 Years) Significant Loss of Industry or Tax Base and/or Loss of Revenues = 2 points

Readiness to Proceed with Project (8 points maximum)

The status of plans, specifications, and preliminary engineering reports for a given project will award the project additional points.

The following criteria and scoring system will be used to evaluate the projects:

‘Plans and Specifications Completed and All Regulatory Permits Secured = 8 points

‘* Plans and Specifications Completed and Reviewed by Regulatory Agencies = 6 points

‘* Plans and Specifications Prepared and Expected to be Complete within 4 Months = 4 points ‘* Plans and Specifications Being Prepared for Project = 2 points

‘* Preliminary Engineering Report for Project Completed = 1 point

8.0 Meeting the Challenges

The three Planning Districts representing for Southwest Virginia face a number of significant challenges with respect to continued provision and expansion of public wastewater collection and treatment services.

• Demographics – Southwest Virginia as a region has a declining and aging population base with a Median Household Income that is less than half of the Virginia state average in most localities.

• Affordability – The study area’s existing sewer customers have some of the highest sewer rates and lowest incomes of any area in the State.

• Geography – Southwest Virginia’s topography is largely mountainous with rock being very predominant – making sewer construction more difficult and expensive than other areas of the State.

• Environment – Southwest Virginia has some of the most biologically diverse and environmentally sensitive waterways in the nation.

• Operator Availability – It is becoming increasingly difficult for localities to find and retain sufficient qualified WWTP operators.

• Cost of Needs – This Study has identified in excess of $1.67 Billion of wastewater construction needs within the three PDC’s. Implementation of even a fraction of these projects will require significant grant assistance.

8.1 Regionalization

Within the three PDC study areas, there are currently forty (40) public sewer service providers serving nearly 59,000 customers. With this many separate entities, there is some degree of duplication of efforts. In an area with declining customer bases and rising operating and construction costs, it is becoming more and more difficult for many systems to remain financially viable.

Regionalization should be evaluated where practical as a means for systems to combine and/or share resources in order to more cost effectively provide services.

There are examples within the study area whereby regional efforts have been taken to address problems. The Cumberland Plateau Regional Waste Management Authority was created in 1992 – Buchanan, Dickenson, and Russell Counties combining their solid waste collection and disposal efforts. There are a number of Regional Jail Authorities that have been established to develop and operate regional jails for their member localities.

One example of a regional approach taken to wastewater service within the study area is the CNW Sewer Authority. This Authority was established in 1987 as a cooperative effort by the Town of Coeburn, City of Norton, and Town of Wise. The Authority initially developed a 4.0 MGD regional wastewater plant to serve these member localities, replacing each of their own former plants. The CNW plant’s capacity has since been expanded to 6.5 MGD and the three member localities still own and operate their respective wastewater collection systems.

Regionalization may not work well in all situations due to factor such as topography, political will, and others. However, regional approaches should be considered when feasible moving forward.

8.1.1 Decentralized Managed Wastewater Systems

The importance of a responsible management entity (RME) for decentralized wastewater systems (DWS) has been discussed in Section 7.1.3.2, along with pointing out the reluctance of some of the public sewer service providers in the region to take on that role. A solution to that problem could be the formation of a regional

8.0 Meeting the Challenges The three Planning Districts representing for Southwest Virginia face a number of significant challenges with respect to continued provision and expansion of public wastewater collection and treatment services.

‘© Demographics - Southwest Virginia as a region has a declining and aging population base with a Median Household Income that is less than half of the Virginia state average in most localities.

‘* Affordability - The study area’s existing sewer customers have some of the highest sewer rates and lowest incomes of any area in the State.

Geography - Southwest Virginia’s topography is largely mountainous with rock being very predominant - making sewer construction more difficult and expensive than other areas of the State
Environment ~ Southwest Virginia has some of the most biologically diverse and environmentally sensitive waterways in the nation.

‘© Operator Availability ~ It is becoming qualified WWTP operators.

increasingly difficult for localities to find and retain suffici

Cost of Needs — This Study has identified in excess of $1.67 Billion of wastewater construction needs within the three PDC’s. Implementation of even a fraction of these projects will require significant grant assistance.

8.1 Regionalization

Regionalization should be evaluated where practical as a means for systems to combine and/or share resources in order to more cost effectively provide services.

There are examples within the study area whereby regional efforts have been taken to address problems. The Cumberland Plateau Regional Waste Management Authority was created in 1992 ~ Buchanan, Dickenson, and Russell Counties combining their solid waste collection and disposal efforts. There are a number of Regional Jail Authorities that have been established to develop and operate regional ails for their member localities.

One example of a regional approach taken to wastewater service within the study area is the CNW Sewer ‘Authority. This Authority was established in 1987 as a cooperative effort by the Town of Coeburn, City of Norton, and Town of Wise. The Authority initially developed a 4.0 MGD regional wastewater plant to serve these member localities, replacing each of their own former plants. The CNW plant’s capacity has since been expanded to 6.5 MGD and the three member localities still own and operate their respective wastewater collection systems.

Regionalization may not work well in all situations due to factor such as topography, political will, and others. However, regional approaches should be considered when feasible moving forward.

8.1.1 _ Decentralized Managed Wastewater Systems ‘The importance of a responsible management entity (RME) for decentralized wastewater systems (DWS) has

been discussed in Section 7.1.3.2, along with pointing out the reluctance of some of the public sewer service providers in the region to take on that role. A solution to that problem could be the formation of a regional

Authority in each Planning District, to manage, operate, and maintain decentralized wastewater systems in their District. The Cumberland Plateau Regional Waste Management Authority is a good model to follow. It has been providing solid waste management services for Buchanan, Dickenson and Russell counties since 1992, and a similar Authority to provide decentralized wastewater system management services would be a way to address a growing problem associated with onsite treatment systems in Southwest Virginia.

A DWS/RME Authority could be staffed with trained and licensed onsite wastewater system operators, which the lack thereof has been discussed in Section 3.7 as one of the biggest challenges for the onsite wastewater industry in Southwest Virginia. Also, since a septic system for an individual home is considered a decentralized wastewater system, the Authority could be actively involved in educating homeowners on the importance of regular maintenance for their septic system, such as the pump-out of the septic tank, and possibly even providing that service. The Authority could also be the applicant for funding to assist with the installation of new onsite wastewater systems and the repair or replacement of failing systems, especially for low-income families.

The Cumberland Plateau Planning District has more challenges with permitting onsite sewage systems than the other two Planning Districts. This is evidenced by the number of VPDES General Permits in the District (500 compared to 400 in the other two Districts combined), which are only permitted when there are no other onsite options available for either a conventional system or some type of alternative system. This would indicate that the logical location for initiating such a DWS/RME Authority would be in the Cumberland Plateau PDC, coupled with the experience they already have in operating a waste management authority.

Brian Stanley is the Environmental Health Manager of the Cumberland Plateau Health District, and a closing paragraph in his letter requested for the Study to address the wastewater needs in his District is as follows:

Providing public sewer or decentralized sewer service to the areas mentioned above would alleviate existing and potential health hazards due to failing or substandard onsite sewage disposal systems. Also, evaluating how to maintain existing onsite systems whether they are
conventional or alternative onsite systems on a regional basis (emphasis added) would help
alleviate future problems before they may arise.

8.2 Implementation of Proactive Policies

8.2.1 Mandatory Hookup Ordinances

Within the study area, only a portion of the wastewater systems have mandatory hookup ordinances that are in effect and being enforced.

Provision of public sewer service is very expensive. Providing this service is even more expensive when all of the potential customers do not participate. Having a strong mandatory hookup ordinance in effect and enforcing that ordinance would be helpful for localities to increase the number of users (rate payers) on sewer line extensions.

Mandatory hookup ordinances have often been politically divisive within the study area. Some localities have opted not to enact or enforce mandatory connections and rely instead upon voluntary participation.

8.2.2 Regulatory Enforcement / DEQ Involvement

As exhibited in this study, many of the wastewater systems and treatment facilities in Southwest Virginia have aged well past their intended useful life. These systems were constructed when “the solution to pollution is dilution” was an accepted truth. Stormwater drains, roof gutters, and basement sump pump lines were all

‘ADWS/RME Authority could be staffed with trained and licensed onsite wastewater system operators, which the lack thereof has been discussed in Section 3.7 as one of the biggest challenges for the onsite wastewater industry in Southwest Virginia. Also, since a septic system for an individual home is considered a decentralized ‘wastewater system, the Authority could be actively involved in educating homeowners on the importance of regular maintenance for their septic system, such as the pump-out of the septic tank, and possibly even providing that service. The Authority could also be the applicant for funding to assist with the installation of new onsite wastewater systems and the repair or replacement of failing systems, especially for low-income families.

‘The Cumberland Plateau Planning District has more challenges with permitting onsite sewage systems than the other two Planning Districts. This is evidenced by the number of VPDES General Permits in the Di (500 compared to 400 in the other two Districts combined), which are only permitted when there are no other onsite options available for either a conventional system or some type of alternative system. This ‘would indicate that the logical location for initiating such a DWS/RME Authority would be in the Cumberland Plateau PDC, coupled with the experience they already have in operating a waste management authority.

Providing public sewer or decentralized sewer service to the areas mentioned above would alleviate existing and potential health hazards due to failing or substandard onsite sewage disposal systems. Also, evaluating how to maintain existing onsite systems whether they are conventional or alternative onsite systems on a regional basis (emphasis added) would help alleviate future problems before they may arise.

8.2 Implementation of Proactive Policies 8.2.1 Mandatory Hookup Ordinances Within the study area, only a portion of the wastewater systems have mandatory hookup ordinances that are

in effect and being enforced.

‘As exhibited in this study, many of the wastewater systems and treatment facilities in Southwest Virginia have aged well past their intended useful life. These systems were constructed when “the solution to pollution is dilution” was an accepted truth. Stormwater drains, roof gutters, and basement sump pump lines were all

connected to the sanitary systems with little thought of consequence. These stormwater connections significantly add to the infiltration/inflow problems and subsequent sewer system overflows experienced by most wastewater systems in the region.

When the coal industry was at its peak, many “company towns” were developed to accommodate the coal miners and their families. The homes in these developments were constructed virtually side by side with no room for septic facilities. The wastewater disposal systems consisted of a “straight pipe” directly from the homes’ plumbing to an adjacent stream. Many of these still exist in Southwest Virginia today. Failing septic systems are also common in the area, and because of the soil conditions and lot sizes, repair or replacement of septic tanks and field lines is often not feasible.

These situations present difficult challenges for local government and regulatory officials. Many of the homeowners are elderly and do not have the resources to correct the issues. In other instances, there are no feasible means to properly dispose of wastewater on the homeowner’s property. Officials are faced with an impossible choice of either allowing the situation to continue or condemning the property. These are complicated problems without easy solutions, but they must be addressed to protect the overall public health and our natural resources.

Wastewater system operators, building officials, local health departments, and the DEQ must work together to address these issues.

• Public wastewater system operators should pass ordinances that clearly prohibit stormwater

connections, including roof gutters and sump pumps. As these connections are identified

through smoke testing and other means, the homeowners should be notified and required to

correct the situation.

• Building officials and local health departments should inventory all failing septic systems and

straight pipes and clearly identify their locations. Regulatory officials along with local officials

should develop policies and procedures for addressing these problems such as not allowing

transfer of ownership until the situation is resolved.

• Funding resources should be identified and/or developed to assist those without the necessary

resources to correct the issues.

8.3 Funding

Substantial wastewater system needs have been identified within the three PDC ’s, including both existing system upgrades and potential collection system extensions to serve new customers:

Planning District Centralized Extensions

Decentralized Systems

Ex. System Upgrades

Cumberland Plateau $ 436,482,917 $ 28,637,600 $ 140,068,456

LENOWISCO 423,925,775 9,357,500 104,542,800

Mount Rogers 371,708,080 21,001,300 136,737,715

  Totals $1,232,116,772 $   58,996,400 $ 381,348,971

Collectively, over $1.67 Billion in wastewater needs have been identified within the study area. Implementing even a portion of these projects will require significant outside funding assistance. Following are brief descriptions of potential funding sources available to localities:

Department of Environmental Quality Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) - The CWSRF is a funding source administered by DEQ for wastewater collection and treatment projects. In the past, the CWSRF has been nearly exclusively loan funds with interest rates ranging from 0% up to market rates and terms up to 30

These situations present difficult challenges for local government and regulatory officials. Many of the homeowners are elderly and do not have the resources to correct the issues. In other instances, there areno feasible means to properly dispose of wastewater on the homeowner’s property. Officials are faced with an impossible choice of either allowing the situation to continue or condemning the property. These are complicated problems without easy solutions, but they must be addressed to protect the overall public health and our natural resources.

Wastewater system operators, building officials, local health departments, and the DEQ must work together to address these issues.

‘Public wastewater system operators should pass ordinances that clearly prohibit stormwater connections, including roof gutters and sump pumps. As these connections are identified through smoke testing and other means, the homeowners should be notified and required to correct the situation.

‘© Building officials and local health departments should inventory all failing septic systems and straight pipes and clearly identify their locations. Regulatory officials along with local officials should develop policies and procedures for addressing these problems such as not allowing transfer of ownership until the situation is resolved.

‘* Funding resources should be identified and/or developed to assist those without the necessary resources to correct the issues.

8.3 Funding

Substantial wastewater system needs have been identified within the three PDC’s, including both existing system upgrades and potential collection system extensions to serve new custome!

Planning Di Centralized Decentralized Ex. System Extensions Systems Upgrades

Cumberland Plateau | $ 436,482,917 | $ 28,637,600 | $ 140,068,456 LENOWISCO 423,925,775 9,357,500 | 104,542,800 Mount Rogers 371,708,080 21,001,300 | 136,737,715 Totals $1,232,116,772_| $ 58,996,400 | $ 381,348,971

years. CWSRF applications are accepted once annually, usually in July. The application review process is competitive in that all applications are ranked in terms of need, cost, readiness to proceed, and a number of other criteria. Appendix I provides some additional information about DEQ’s program.

Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) - DHCD has a number of grant assistance programs, two of which include the Community Facilities Grants and Community Economic Development Fund Grants. DHCD grants require a grant management agency to monitor the project and administer the grant funds. The grant manager can be either a direct employee of the grant applicant or it can be an independent outside agency.

The Community Facilities Grant (CF) program offers grants of up to a maximum amount of $1,400,000 for eligible projects with three activities. A project with sewer only would be eligible for a maximum of $1,000,000. CF grants must be tied directly to infrastructure or housing improvements to benefit Low-to- Moderate Income (LMI) households. Over 51% of the project beneficiaries must meet LMI eligibility requirements. For sewer projects, DHCD will not fund more than $25,000 per household, based upon the number of houses served. CF grant applications are due in May of each year and all applications received statewide are scored competitively.

The Community Economic Development Fund (CEDF) Grant program offers grants of up to a maximum amount of $700,000 for eligible projects. CEDF Grants are awarded on a non-competitive basis as applications are made for eligible projects. The program is established to help communities implement off-site infrastructure improvements required to attract new industries, enable existing industries to expand, or to retain existing industries. When available funds have expired, applications are held until new funds are appropriated. There are a number of requirements which must be met for a project to be eligible, but the three principal stipulations for a project to be eligible are:

The industry involved must make an investment of at least $3,000,000 in building or equipment related costs for the new/expanded facility.
The industry involved must hire in excess of 50 new employees for the new/expanded facility.
The industry must screen the new employees hired (for a period of up to 3 years) to ensure that in excess of 51% of those targeted for hiring meet LMI eligibility guidelines.

DHCD’s CEDF program would only be applicable if there would be a qualifying commitment for new jobs.

USDA-Rural Development (RD) - RD is a federal agency under the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Agriculture. RD offers low interest loan and grant assistance for development of community water and sewer facilities. The funding application process for RD is composed of two parts. The first step is filing of the funding Pre-Application which generally includes all of the project’s supporting documentation and is used to determine the project’s eligibility for RD assistance. If a project is RD eligible, then a formal Application is invited following completion of the Pre-Application review. Applications for financial assistance from RD can be made at any time, but funding offerings are dependent upon the availability of funds.

The RD funding application review process is competitive, and there has been a large demand for RD assistance in recent years. Determination of award amount is made on a case-by-case basis after review of a number of factors. For community water and sewer facilities, the maximum amount of grant which RD can offer is up to 75% of the eligible project costs. RD loans are offered for terms up to 40 years with interest rates generally lower than the market rate. USDA-RD’s current poverty loan interest rate is 2.125%.

years. CWSRF applications are accepted once annually, usually in July. The application review process is competitive in that all applications are ranked in terms of need, cost, readiness to proceed, and a number of other criteria. Appendix | provides some additional information about DEQ’s program.

‘The Community Facilities Grant (CF) program offers grants of up to a maximum amount of $1,400,000 for eligible projects with three activities. A project with sewer only would be eligible for a maximum of $1,000,000. CF grants must be tied directly to infrastructure or housing improvements to benefit Low-to- Moderate Income (LMI) households. Over 51% of the project beneficiaries must meet LMI eligibility requirements. For sewer projects, DHCD will not fund more than $25,000 per household, based upon the number of houses served. CF grant applications are due in May of each year and all applications received statewide are scored competitively.

The industry involved must make an investment of at least $3,000,000 in building or equipment related costs for the new/expanded facility.
The industry involved must hire in excess of 50 new employees for the new/expanded facility.
The industry must screen the new employees hired (for a period of up to 3 years) to ensure that in excess of 51% of those targeted for hiring meet LMI eligibility guidelines.

DHCD’s CEDF program would only be applicable if there would be a qualifying commitment for new jobs.

The RD funding program places a higher emphasis on projects that serve a higher percentage of residential users.

Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission (VTIC) – The Virginia Tobacco Commission provides funding primarily for economic development related project in eligible Virginia localities. If an industrial prospect were to commit to a new development, then VTIC could potentially be pursued for sewer funding assistance.

Current VTIC funding guidelines typically fund 50% of an eligible project as a grant and requires the applicant to provide a 50% match from other sources.

Economic Development Administration (EDA) - EDA offers infrastructure improvement grants for projects which are needed to help communities develop economically, with the primary emphasis being new industrial growth. EDA grants are made on a competitive basis after funding applications are received and reviewed. A number of requirements must be met for a project to be eligible for EDA funds. Some of the requirements include that new jobs are being created or existing jobs retained, and the unemployment rate in the project location must be above the national average at the time the application is made. EDA projects are very often on a long waiting list and can take years to achieve funding. EDA projects require a grant manager.

Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) – The ARC is an economic development partnership agency of the federal government and 13 state governments focusing on 423 counties across the Appalachian Region. Every county in the study area is included in the ARC footprint. The Virginia ARC program works closely with PDC’s in the development of eligible projects. ARC Objectives include promoting regional partnerships that support regional economic development, encourage activities that diversify the economic base and enhance entrepreneurial activities; and to assist communities to develop, expand and upgrade infrastructure, including broadband, to allow for greater access to resources and opportunities for increased economic growth and to improve the quality of life. As it relates to wastewater, ARC strategies include assisting with installation of public infrastructure for new business location/expansion and creating jobs for the region; to support project that encourage broad-based, regional cooperation and provide increased regional economic growth opportunities; to assist water supply and wastewater treatment projects that will support private investment, leading to job creation or retention; and to support the deployment of regional solutions to address water/wastewater infrastructure needs.

In Virginia, DHCD serves as the ARC Registered State Basic Agency and is responsible for administrative and fiscal oversight and compliance monitoring of construction projects. Construction projects are eligible for up to $500,000 in funding. Planning grants are eligible for up to $50,000 in funding.

Planning District Commissions (PDC) – Each of the three Planning Districts within the study area has an annual allocation of funding received from DHCD that is made available for potential water or sewer projects within the respective District. These funds are typically capped at $100,000 per project and are very often used as local matching funds to be used as part of a larger project funded by other agencies.

Other Agencies/Allocations – The aforementioned agencies are those which are typically regularly utilized by those localities within the study area for sewer projects. There are other agencies which have provided sewer project funding assistance before and may potentially be available again in the future; such as

US Army Corps of Engineers
Environmental Protection Agency
State Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG)
Special State or Federal Legislative Assistance Allocations

The RD funding program places a higher emphasis on projects that serve a higher percentage of residential users.

Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission (VTIC) - The Virginia Tobacco Commission provides funding primarily for economic development related project in eligible Virginia localities. If an industrial prospect were to commit to a new development, then VTIC could potentially be pursued for sewer funding assistance.

Current VTIC funding guidelines typically fund 50% of an eligible project as a grant and requires the applicant to provide a 50% match from other sources.

Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) ~ The ARCis an economic development partnership agency of the federal government and 13 state governments focusing on 423 counties across the Appalachian Region. Every county in the study area is included in the ARC footprint. The Virginia ARC program works closely with PDC’s in the development of eligible projects. ARC Objectives include promoting regional partnerships that support regional economic development, encourage activities that diversify the economic base and enhance entrepreneurial activities; and to assist communities to develop, expand and upgrade infrastructure, including broadband, to allow for greater access to resources and opportunities for increased economic growth and to improve the quality of life. As it relates to wastewater, ARC strategies include assisting with installation of public infrastructure for new business location/expansion and creating jobs for the region; to support project that encourage broad-based, regional cooperation and provide increased regional economic growth opportunities; to assist water supply and wastewater treatment projects that will support private investment, leading to job creation or retention; and to support the deployment of regional solutions to address water/wastewater infrastructure needs.

ions (PDC) - Each of the three Planning Districts within the study area has an annual allocation of funding received from DHCD that is made available for potential water or sewer projects within the respective District. These funds are typically capped at $100,000 per project and are very often used as local matching funds to be used as part of a larger project funded by other agencies.

Other Agencies/Allocations — The aforementioned agencies are those which are typically regularly utilized by those localities within the study area for sewer projects. There are other agencies which have provided sewer project funding assistance before and may potentially be available again in the future; such as

US Army Corps of Engineers
Environmental Protection Agency
State Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG)
Special State or Federal Legislative Assistance Allocations

Private Financial Institutions – Private banks and financial institutions can potentially be utilized for project funding. However, these facilities offer funding as loans and would not be able to offer grant assistance.

Privatization – There are private firms which can provide sewer system assistance through operation/maintenance contracts and/or system purchase. A number of the localities within the study area have (or still) utilize private firms to operate their wastewater treatment facilities. These operational agreements are typically for a long range (> 5 year) term and would allow the locality to retain ownership of the treatment facility and retain eligibility for potential government sourced funding agencies.

There are also private utility companies that purchase public locality water and/or wastewater systems and provide the utility service. When a locality sells their utility system, they generally lose their independence to make decisions about the utility’s rates and policies. A privately owned utility is also typically not eligible to receive grant funding assistance from many of the funding agencies that are available to public localities.

8.3.1 Decentralized Wastewater Systems - Public funding for decentralized wastewater systems (DWS) has not been a high priority for the agencies that typically provide funding for water and wastewater projects in Southwest Virginia. However, with EPA’s growing recognition of the importance of DWS through its Decentralized Wastewater MOU Partnership, that may be changing. Information on this partnership can be found on the EPA website (www.epa.gov/septic).

One of the core priorities of the MOU Partnership for the 2020 -2023 period is stated as follows:

Share information on funding sources and pursue innovative public and private financing options to help communities and homeowners replace, upgrade, or maintain decentralized wastewater systems.

One existing funding source is EPA’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund, and a recent EPA Fact Sheet titled ‘Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems’ explaining this program is found in Appendix G.

Another encouraging indication of funding for DWS is the Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Act of 2021 authorized $550 million annually in new grant programs, one of which is for the ‘installation or upgrade of decentralized wastewater systems’. This is not nearly enough obviously to address decentralized needs nationwide, but at least the DWS concept has now being recognized as a need and hopefully funding will continue to increase.

9.0 Educating the Public

Adequate public wastewater collection and treatment systems (existing and proposed) are paramount to public health and welfare, to the success of the Southwest region in sustaining existing businesses and industries and recruiting new developments and associated economic growth, and for the emerging tourism industry. Many of the outdoor recreational opportunities afforded by Southwest Virginia include the natural environment, and specifically rivers and streams. Protecting these vital natural resources, including some of the most biodiverse streams in the nation, is of critical consequence to the region’s future.

Unfortunately, the construction and continued maintenance of wastewater systems are expensive and the public that bear those costs must be educated to understand the overall benefits the systems provide and the consequences of inaction. To succeed in this, the public and their local elected officials must be actively engaged. This will require a sustained effort from multiple stakeholders and will involve the expenditure of resources in both time and money. Some suggestions include the following:

• Each of the three PDCs and the regional DEQ office should consider designating individuals to serve on a committee charged with developing and managing initiatives involving the education of the

http://www.epa.gov/septic Private Financial Institutions ~ Private banks and financial institutions can potentially be utilized for project funding. However, these facilities offer funding as loans and would not be able to offer grant assistance.

Privatization — There are private firms which can provide sewer system assistance through operation/maintenance contracts and/or system purchase. A number of the localities within the study area have (or still) utilize private firms to operate their wastewater treatment facilities. These operational agreements are typically for a long range (> 5 year) term and would allow the locality to retain ownership of the treatment facility and retain eligibility for potential government sourced funding agencies.

‘There are also private utility companies that purchase public locality water and/or wastewater systems and provide the utility service. When a locality sells their utility system, they generally lose their independence to make decisions about the utility’s rates and policies. A privately owned utility is also typically not eligible to receive grant funding assistance from many of the funding agencies that are available to public localities.

found on the EPA website (www.epa.gov/septic).

One of the core priorities of the MOU Partnership for the 2020 -2023 period is stated as follows:

Share information on funding sources and pursue innovative public and private financing options to help communities and homeowners replace, upgrade, or maintain decentralized wastewater systems.

‘Another encouraging indication of funding for DWSis the Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Act of 2021 authorized $550 million annually in new grant programs, one of which is for the ‘installation or upgrade of decentralized wastewater systems’. This is not nearly enough obviously to address decentralized needs nationwide, but at least the DWS concept has now being recognized as a need and hopefully funding will continue to increase.

9.0 Educating the Public

‘© Each of the three PDCs and the regional DEQ office should consider designating individuals to serve on a committee charged with developing and managing initiatives involving the education of the

public. The committee could also include individuals from local organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Upper Tennessee River Roundtable, local health departments, local engineering firms and business leaders, elected state and local representatives, and others. Th e Committee should meet and communicate on a regular basis.

• Each of the three PDCs and the regional DEQ office should consider developing educational materials regarding wastewater systems and the environment, especially as they relate to the overall public health and the environment. This material could be distributed to local chambers of commerce and news organizations. Strong consideration should also be given to purchasing ads that link the material on social media outlets such as Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat. The websites of the PDCs and DEQ should also include links to the new material.

• With each new rehabilitation or construction project, a project sign and groundbreaking and/or ribbon cutting ceremony should be held as a condition of funding. These projects should be celebrated and publicized to underscore their importance to the local community.

• Learning opportunities, such as field trips to wastewater treatment facilities, should be developed with the cooperation of local middle and high schools to expose students to the importance of proper wastewater collection and treatment. Local engineering firms should be approached for volunteers to help with these efforts. Either the committee described above or the DEQ should lead this endeavor.

Wastewater collection and treatment systems largely operate out of sight and mind of the public. However, they are among the most important and essential public infrastructure systems. The public must be made aware of their vital role in protecting public and environmental health and we must encourage everyone to participate in efforts to improve and protect our area’s natural resources. Educating and engaging the public may be one of the most important tools for making a difference in the water quality of Southwest Virginia.

10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of public wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure is one of the most fiscally challenging issues facing local governments in Southwest Virginia. This situation is exacerbated by the depressed economies, declining populations, aging infrastructure, undulating topography, unsuitable soil conditions, lack of qualified wastewater treatment plant operators, and other issues faced by our region. Nevertheless, adequate wastewater collection and treatment is one of the most important aspects of the quality of life for the public. Maintaining public health, sustaining existing and providing for future residential, commercial, and industrial growth, and protecting the environment, particularly the ecosystem of our waterways is dependent upon adequate wastewater infrastructure.

This Study was funded by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and is to be utilized as a road map for the future implementation of sanitary sewer projects, both existing and proposed new systems and treatment facilities, in Southwest Virginia PDCs One, Two, and Three. The Study will also serve as a basis for need and costs for current and future Clean Watersheds Needs Survey efforts required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Program and for the upcoming Commonwealth Needs Assessment promulgated in 2021.

The Study evaluated and identified needs for existing public wastewater systems and treatment facilities, updated the status of the system extension projects identified in the 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study, and identified new potential extension projects and prioritized those projects based on a detailed scoring criteria. In total, the study identified over $1.67 Billion in conventional and decentralized system rehabilitation and extension/development needs within Southwest Virginia.

public, The committee could also include individuals from local organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Upper Tennessee River Roundtable, local health departments, local engineering firms and business leaders, elected state and local representatives, and others. Th e Committee should meet and communicate on a regular basis.

‘© Each of the three PDCs and the regional DEQ office should consider developing educational materials, regarding wastewater systems and the environment, especially as they relate to the overall public health and the environment. This material could be distributed to local chambers of commerce and news organizations. Strong consideration should also be given to purchasing ads that link the material on social media outlets such as Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat. The websites of the PDCs and DEQ should also include links to the new material.

With each new rehabilitation or construction project, a project sign and groundbreaking and/or ribbon cutting ceremony should be held as a condition of funding. These projects should be celebrated and publicized to underscore their importance to the local community.
Learning opportunities, such as field trips to wastewater treatment facilities, should be developed with the cooperation of local middle and high schools to expose students to the importance of proper wastewater collection and treatment. Local engineering firms should be approached for volunteers to help with these efforts. Either the committee described above or the DEQ should lead this endeavor.

Wastewater collection and treatment systems largely operate out of sight and mind of the public. However, they are among the most important and essential public infrastructure systems. The public must be made aware of their vital role in protecting public and environmental health and we must encourage everyone to participate in efforts to improve and protect our area’s natural resources. Educating and engaging the publ may be one of the most important tools for making a difference in the water quality of Southwest Virgini

10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of public wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure is one of the most fiscally challenging issues facing local governments in Southwest Virginia. This situation is exacerbated by the depressed economies, declining populations, aging infrastructure, undulating topography, unsuitable soil conditions, lack of qualified wastewater treatment plant operators, and other issues faced by our region. Nevertheless, adequate wastewater collection and treatment is one of the most important aspects of the quality of life for the public. Maintaining public health, sustaining existing and providing for future residential, commercial, and industrial growth, and protecting the environment, particularly the ecosystem of our waterways is dependent upon adequate wastewater infrastructure

This Study was funded by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and is to be utilized as a road map for the future implementation of sanitary sewer projects, both existing and proposed new systems and treatment facilities, in Southwest Virginia PDCs One, Two, and Three. The Study will also serve as a basis, for need and costs for current and future Clean Watersheds Needs Survey efforts required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Program and for the upcoming Commonwealth Needs Assessment promulgated in 2021.

‘The Study evaluated and identified needs for existing public wastewater systems and treatment facilities, updated the status of the system extension projects identified in the 2005 Southwest Virginia Regional ‘Wastewater Study, and identified new potential extension projects and prioritized those projects based ona detailed scoring criteria. In total, the study identified over $1.67 Billion in conventional and decentralized system rehabilitation and extension/development needs within Southwest Virginia,

With each passing year, the costs associated with maintaining wastewater system infrastructure continue to rise. The challenges facing Southwest Virginia are daunting as populations in poverty and decline must attempt to maintain aging sewer infrastructure. The future of this region is largely dependent upon meeting this challenge. The following are the findings and recommendations of the Study:

• An informational meeting should be held with all stakeholders, including system owners and operators, local environmental health district managers, local politicians, funding agencies, news outlets, the three PDCs, and DEQ. The meeting should present the findings and recommendations of the Study and discuss the path forward.

• The Study identified deteriorating and aging sewer systems and I/I as major issues affecting existing systems. The DEQ Southwest Virginia Pilot Program Step 1 provided much needed funding to localities for use in preparing Sewer System Evaluation Surveys. These surveys and studies are invaluable in evaluating existing sewer systems and identifying and prioritizing rehabilitation efforts.
Step 2 program funding is currently being utilized for design and construction of rehabilitation projects throughout Southwest Virginia. Strong consideration should be given to DEQ continuing both the Step 1 and Step 2 programs.

• The study identified the lack of quality wastewater treatment operators as a growing concern. Efforts should be made to partner with existing community colleges to offer classes related to wastewater treatment plant operation and to prepare potential students for their licensure exams. Consideration should also be given to beginning an apprenticeship program funded by the state to help train the next generation of operators.

• Many of the existing wastewater systems in Southwest Virginia have a diminishing and impoverished customer base. These localities face an almost impossible task of maintaining their existing collection systems and treatment facilities. Wherever possible, consolidation of smaller systems into county- wide public service authorities should be strongly considered and encouraged. Regionalization including the cooperation of larger systems should be one of the first alternatives evaluated in future projects.

• Adequate wastewater systems benefit everyone by protecting our critical ecosystems, particularly our waterways. If the trends hold, Southwest Virginia will be largely dependent on tourism based upon outdoor recreational opportunities. Therefore, strong consideration should be given to instituting county-wide mandatory hook-up ordinances or sewer availability fees that can be used to offset the costs of system expansions.

• The Study identified over $1.67 Billion in needed wastewater system and treatment facility improvements and needed decentralized system construction and conventional system extension projects within Southwest Virginia. This enormous cost will continue to grow year after year as the wastewater infrastructure continues to age and as the costs of goods and services rise. Funding from local, state, and federal sources will need to be secured at a much higher amount than currently available. The findings of the Study should be utilized in cooperation with elected officials to underscore the urgency of the situation facing the region and to increase the availability of state and federal funding for these critical projects.

• Strong consideration should be given to the implementation of the recommendations of Section 9.0 with regard to educating the public.

• A more concentrated emphasis is needed by regulatory and funding agencies on the advantages and benefits of managed decentralized wastewater systems, particularly in areas where the extension of central wastewater systems is cost-prohibitive.

‘With each passing year, the costs associated with maintaining wastewater system infrastructure continue to

ise. The challenges facing Southwest Virginia are daunting as populations in poverty and decline must attempt to maintain aging sewer infrastructure. The future of this region is largely dependent upon meeting this challenge. The following are the findings and recommendations of the Study:

An informational meeting should be held with all stakeholders, including system owners and operators, local environmental health district managers, local politicians, funding agencies, news outlets, the three PDCs, and DEQ, The meeting should present the findings and recommendations of the Study and discuss the path forward.
The Study identified deteriorating and aging sewer systems and I/I as major issues affecting existing systems. The DEQ Southwest Virginia Pilot Program Step 1 provided much needed funding to localities for use in preparing Sewer System Evaluation Surveys. These surveys and studies are invaluable in evaluating existing sewer systems and identifying and prioritizing rehabilitation efforts. Step 2 program funding is currently being utilized for design and construction of rehabilitation projects throughout Southwest Virginia. Strong consideration should be given to DEQ continuing both the Step 1 and Step 2 programs.
The study identified the lack of quality wastewater treatment operators as a growing concern. Efforts should be made to partner with existing community colleges to offer classes related to wastewater treatment plant operation and to prepare potential students for their licensure exams. Consideration should also be given to beginning an apprenticeship program funded by the state to help train the next generation of operators.

‘© Many of the existing wastewater systems in Southwest Virginia have a diminishing and impoverished customer base. These localities face an almost impossible task of maintaining their existing collection systems and treatment facilities. Wherever possible, consolidation of smaller systems into county- wide public service authorities should be strongly considered and encouraged. Regionalization including the cooperation of larger systems should be one of the first alternatives evaluated in future projects.

Adequate wastewater systems benefit everyone by protecting our critical ecosystems, particularly our waterways. If the trends hold, Southwest Virginia will be largely dependent on tourism based upon outdoor recreational opportunities. Therefore, strong consideration should be given to instituting county-wide mandatory hook-up ordinances or sewer availability fees that can be used to offset the costs of system expansions.

‘© The Study identified over $1.67 Billion in needed wastewater system and treatment facility improvements and needed decentralized system construction and conventional system extension projects within Southwest Virginia. This enormous cost will continue to grow year after year as the ‘wastewater infrastructure continues to age and as the costs of goods and services rise. Funding from local, state, and federal sources will need to be secured at a much higher amount than currently available. The findings of the Study should be utilized in cooperation with elected officials to underscore the urgency of the situation facing the region and to increase the availability of state and federal funding for these critical projects.

Strong consideration should be given to the implementation of the recommendations of Section 9.0 with regard to educating the public.
Amore concentrated emphasis is needed by regulatory and funding agencies on the advantages and benefits of managed decentralized wastewater systems, particularly in areas where the extension of central wastewater systems is cost-prohibitive.

APPENDIX A

EXISTING SYSTEM INFORMATION AND MAPPING

This Appendix includes a summary description of all public sewage collection system and wastewater treatment plants within the three Planning District study areas. The data presented is based upon the information received in response to system inquiries that were distributed during Study preparation. In some instances, incomplete or missing data may not have been received by the requested deadlines. The data is segregated by the three Planning Districts.

APPENDIX A

EXISTING SYSTEM INFORMATION AND MAPPING

incomplete or missing data may not have been received by the requested deadlines. The data is segregated by the three Planning Districts.

APPENDIX A

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS AND MAPS

APPENDIX A

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS AND MAPS

BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY CONAWAY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (VA0090531) Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description – The Buchanan County Public Service Authority Conaway Wastewater Treatment System serves a large portion of Buchanan County. The collection system was constructed in 1973.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,205 Residential Customers 38 Commercial Customers 155 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

1,398 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 98% residential and 2% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 8 inch through 20 inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 5% of the system consists of ductile iron pipe and approximately 78% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2009. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970s.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 49,386,100 13,975,000 28%

February 59,654,000 11,215,100 19%

March 41,152,500 12,001,500 29%

April 69,441,000 12,040,100 17%

May 60,313,600 10,898,900 18%

June 57,285,000 11,490,600 20%

July 51,249,200 11,045,200 22%

August 50,982,600 11,095,700 22%

September 47,736,000 15,020,300 31%

October 45,067,800 11,197,100 25%

November 38,958,000 10,864,200 28%

December 42,141,400 10,619,700 25%

Monthly Average 51,113,933 11,788,617 23%

Daily Average 1,680,458 387,571 23%

Avg / Customer 1,202 277

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Aging equipment at treatment plant,  Aging pipes in collection system,  Inflow and Infiltration concerns,  Electrical problems for equipment.

System Needs

 Replacement of the sewer treatment plant,  Rehabilitation of collection system.

BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY CONAWAY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (VA0090531)

Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description — The Buchanan County Public Service Authority Conaway Wastewater Treatment System serves a large portion of Buchanan County. The collection system was constructed in 1973.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,205 Residential Customers

38 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

0 — Other Municipal Systems 1,398 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 98% residential and 2% non- residential

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 49,386,100 13,975,000 28% February 59,654,000 11,215,100 19% March 41,152,500 12,001,500 29% April 69,441,000 12,040,100 17% May 60,313,600 10,898,900 18% June 57,285,000 11,490,600 20% July 51,249,200 11,045,200 22% August 50,982,600 11,095,700 2% September 47,736,000 15,020,300 31% October 45,067,800 11,197,100 28% November 38,958,000 10,864,200 28% December 42,141,400 10,619,700 25% Monthly Average 51,113,933 11,788,617 23% Daily Average 1,680,458 387,571 2% Avg / Customer 1,202 277

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Aging equipment at treatment plant,
Aging pipes in collection system,
Inflow and Infiltration concerns,
Electrical problems for equipment.

System Needs

Replacement of the sewer treatment plant,
Rehabilitation of collection system,

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Buchanan County Public Service Authority collection system had 5 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 5 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 0 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris.

 The system has not had any permit violations over the past 3 years since December of 2018  The collection system is under a consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated 2016-2017

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines. Not enforced.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the system in January 2022 by Thompson & Litton. The SSES identified $5,065,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Thompson & Litton in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in July 2021:

Residential Out of County

Fee

$25.00 First 1,000 Gallons $9.50

$9.00 Every 1,000 Gallons After

Commercial (5/8")

$37.50 First 1,000 Gallons

$9.00 Every 1,000 Gallons After

Commercial (1")

$60.00 First 1,000 Gallons

$9.00 Every 1,000 Gallons After

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

$2,000,000 loan with the Collection system, Vac Truck, and CCTV camera system.

Opinion of Probable Project Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable project cost for the identified facility improvements is $5,600,000.

Improvement Cost

Lining 5,430 linear feet of sewer main and 32 masonry manholes.

$560,000

CCTV approximately 50,000 linear feet of sewer main and lining of 160 manholes.

$5,040,000

Total $5,600,000

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Buchanan County Public Service Authority collection system had 5 reported sewer system overflows uring calendar year 2021. § were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, @ were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris.
The system has not had any permit violations over the past 3 years since December of 2018
The collection system is under a consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated 2016-2017

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines. Not enforced.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the system in January 2022 by Thompson & Litton. The SSES identified $5,065,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

‘Asset Management Plan The system has an asset management plan prepared by Thompson & Litton in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in July 2021

Out of County Residential Fee $25.00 | First 1,000 Gallons $9.50 $9.00 | Every 1,000 Gallons After

Commercial (5/8") $37.50 | First 1,000 Gallons $9,00 | Every 1,000 Gallons After

Commercial (1") $60.00 | First 1,000 Gallons $9.00 | Every 1,000 Gallons After

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans $2,000,000 loan with the Collection system, Vac Truck, and CCTV camera system.

Opinion of Probable Project Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable project cost for

the identified facility improvements is $5,600,000.

Improvement Cost

Lining 5,430 linear feet of sewer main and 32 masonry | $560,000 manholes.

CCTV approximately 50,000 linear feet of sewer main | $5,040,000 and lining of 160 manholes.

Total $5,600,000

BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY CONAWAY– VPDES PERMIT #VA0090531 BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at Conaway Rd, Big Rock, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1986. The facility utilizes secondary treatment as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the BCPSA collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 2.0 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 51,113,933 gallons. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 2.033 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 165 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Levisa River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the BCPSA. Currently, 5 full time and
part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 1, 1 Class 2, 1 Class 3, 1 Class 4, and 1 trainee.
The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Aged equipment,  Aged pipes,  Aged equipment and parts,  High flows,  Aging electrical issues.

Facility Needs – Identified facility needs are as follows:

 Facility needs replacing,  Lack of space for upgrades or expansion.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable project cost for the identified facility improvements is $7,850,000.

Improvement Cost Replacement of Influent Pump Station $1,350,000 Replacement of Grit Removal Pumps $800,000 Replacement of Rotating Biological Contactors $1,200,000 Replacement of Biological Contactor Blowers $1,350,000 Replacement of Primary Sludge Pump Station $900,000 Replacement of Secondary Sludge Pump Station $1,800,000 Replacement of Aerobic Digester Blower $450,000 Total $7,850,000

BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY CONAWAY—

VPDES PERMIT #VA0090531 BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District

Facility Description ~ The treatment facility is located at Conaway Rd, Big Rock, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1986. The facility utilizes secondary treatment as the method of sewage treatment.

average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 51,113,933 gallons. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 2.033 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 165 days during this period, Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Levisa River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by the BCPSA. Currently, 5 full time and part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 1, 1 Class 2, 1 Class 3, 1 Class 4, and 1 trainee. The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations — The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility — The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Aged equipment, Aged pipes, Aged equipment and parts,

High flows, Aging electrical

sues, Facility Needs ~ Identified facility needs are as follows:

Facility needs replacing,

Lack of space for upgrades or expansion,

inion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable project cost for the identified facility improvements is $7,850,000.

Improvement Cost Replacement of Influent Pump Station $31,350,000 Replacement of Grit Removal Pumps $800,000

Replacement of Rotating Biological Contactors | $1,200,000 Replacement of Biological Contactor Blowers __| $1,350,000

Replacement of Primary Sludge Pump Station | $900,000 Replacement of Secondary Sludge Pump Station | $1,800,000 Replacement of Aerobic Digester Blower $450,000

Total $7,850,000

0 1,000 2,000

8,000 Feet

Legend

[| Treatment Plant © Manhole

— Gravity Main

VIRGINIA

USGS The Natlofal Map: National Boundaries Dataset) 3DEP Elevation Program) Gedaraphic Names information System, National Hydrography Datases National Land Cover Database, National Structifes Dafsset.sand Natiofialiansportation Dataset USGS Global Ecosysteris; US Census Bureau TIGHRLIne datar USFS fload Data; Natural Eatth Data) US;Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; 2nd NOAA NationalCenters Yor Environmental Information U.S. Coastal Relief Model, Data refreshed June, 2022.

THOMPSON

euitton J

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY

DEQ

0 1,000 2,000 8,000 SS Feet

Legend

[3] Treatment Plant © Manhole

— Gravity Main

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataser Dataset, National Lahd Cover Database, Nationg Stet

Bureau TIGER/Line:data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data: US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Infor for Eosironmental information, US: Coastal Relieg

DEP EelantMarroaram Geographic Names Ihtormation System, National Hydkography Dataset, a SPT Met USGS Global Fea!

sms; US. Census Unit; and NOAA National Centers ll, Data refreshed lime, 2022

euitton J

THOMPSON

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY

DEQ

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 ZL ( =) SS oct oF —<—— aa

Legend Y peas os

[4] Treatment Plant @ = Manhole

— Gravity Main

sGS The Natienel gg Dataset, National

IGER/Line

——

b( Boundaties glfaset SDEP ED Mian ProgiaaPteoaraphic Names Information System, Nafionalllyaregchy Cover Dae fa Structures Onfsach aMeM ional Transportation Dataset USGS GloballEcosysteits: US Ge Mus ‘USFS Road Data: Natural Earth Data; US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Unit: and NOAA National Cont J = for Enwhanimental nfornjation, U.S. Coastal Relief Mattel, Data refteshetl lune, 9m

ANE ROUP

-£ji0

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

BUCHANAN COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY

DEQ

3 0F OF 4

Legend

[9] Treatment Plant @ Manhole

— Gravity Main

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Feet

VIRGINIA

USGS The National Maff Nallgpal BSundat igs DataseteaDEP Hayation Program, Geographic Names infoiftatdn Syste National Hyd Dataset, National Land€oyer Database, National Swilewures Datastiiand National Transportation Dataset; USGS Gehl Ecosystems: UNS. Bureall TIGER/Lineldata, USFS Road Data; Natura! Earth’ OataiUlS. DepartmEhiof State Humanitarian Informaign|Unit and NOAA National Cenea fonnuohmental Information, US. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022.

-£ji0

THOMPSON

euitton J

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL

SEWER STUDY 2022

BUCHANAN COUNTY

PUBLIC SERVICE

AUTHORITY

TOWN OF CLINTWOOD (VA0026565) Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Clintwood Wastewater Treatment System serves the Town of Clintwood located in the Northwest section of Dickenson County East of the Town of Pound along route 83. The collection system was constructed in the 1986.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

781 Residential Customers 131 Commercial Customers 1 Other Municipal Systems

913 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 92% residential and 8% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4 inch through 12 inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 90% of the system consists of PVC and 10% ductile iron pipe and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick but have been lined. The rest of the manhole are precast concrete. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2009. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1986.

The system includes four pump stations:

 Happy Valley Lift Station: 15 HP 4”, Feeds into 8”

 Longs Fork Lift Station: 15 HP 4” Feeds into 8”

 Colley Lift Station: 60 HP 4” Feeds into 8”

 Brush Creek Lift Station: Numatics Connection 4”, Feeds into 8”

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 6,435,700 2,945,800 46%

February 9,260,300 2,964,500 32%

March 8,635,600 3,599,700 42%

April 5,280,500 4,075,600 77%

May 5,227,300 3,164,600 61%

June 5,645,500 3,781,700 67%

July 4,944,300 3,561,900 72%

August 6,682,000 3,388,200 51%

September 5,216,900 3,307,800 63%

October 5,234,900 4,460,200 85%

November 4,354,700 3,634,600 83%

December 5,242,600 3,761,000 72%

Monthly Average 6,013,358 3,553,800 59%

Daily Average 197,699 116,837 59%

Avg / Customer 123 126

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Electrical issues,  Age of equipment,  Parts are difficult to find.

TOWN OF CLINTWOOD (VA0026565)

Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Town of Clintwood Wastewater Treatment System serves the Town of Clintwood located in the Northwest section of Dickenson County East of the Town of Pound along route 83. The collection system was constructed in the 1986.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

781 Residential Customers 131 Commercial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 913 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 92% residential and 8% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4 inch through 12 inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 90% of the system consists of PVC and 10% ductile iron pipe and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick but have been lined. The rest of the manhole are precast concrete, The newest area of the system was constructed in 2009. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1986.

The system includes four pump stations: Happy Valley Lift St

Longs Fork Lift Station: 15 HP 4” Feeds into 8”
Colley Lift Station: 60 HP 4” Feeds into 8”

:: 15 HP 4”, Feeds into 8”

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 6,435,700 2,945,800 46% February 9,260,300 2,964,500 32% March 8,635,600 3,599,700 42%

5,280,500 4,075,600 1%

5,227,300 3,164,600 61% June 5,645,500 3,781,700 67% July 4,944,300 3,561,900 2% August 6,682,000 3,388,200 51% September 5,216,900 3,307,800 63% October 5,234,900 4,460,200 85% November 4,354,700 3,634,600 83% December 5,242,600 3,761,000 12% Monthly Average 6,013,358 3,553,800 59% Daily Average 197,699 116,837 59% Avg/ Customer 123 126

Electrical issues,
Age of equipment,
Parts are difficult to find.

System Needs

 All pumps need to be replaced,  Blowers need to be replaced,  Motors need to be replaced for blowers.

Sewer Use Ordinance: It is enforced

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

No SSES has been done for the Town of Clintwood.

Asset Management Plan

No Asset Management Plan has been done for the Town of Clintwood.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in June 2022:

Residential Commercial

In - Town In - Town

$17.00 2000 gal $22.00 2000 gal

Out of Town Out of Town

$22.00 2000 gal $32.50 2000 gal Clintwood Processes sewer for Dickenson County PSA (George Fork Area) $6.00 per 1000

gal.

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

No Sewer Loans

System Needs

All pumps need to be replaced,

Blowers need to be replaced,
Motors need to be replaced for blowers.

Sewer Use Ordinance: It is enforced

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

No SSES has been done for the Town of Clintwood.

Asset Management Plan

‘No Asset Management Plan has been done for the Town of Clintwood. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in June 2022:

Residential Commercial In- Town, In- Town $17.00 | 2000 gal $22.00 [2000 gal Out of Town Out of Town $22.00 | 2000 gal $32.50 [2000 gal Clintwood Processes sewer for Dickenson County PSA (George Fork Area) $6.00 per 1000 gal

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

No Sewer Loans

[a] Treatment Plant [System Pump Station

— Gravity Main

== * Force Main

Legend

@ Manhole

‘Town of Clintwood Longs Fork Pump Station

a = ed Feet

000 2,000 4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

Colley

USGS The National Map! National Boundaries Dataset Dataset, Nationaliland Gover Database, National Stu

Town of Clintwood

Pump Station

DEElevation Prdgiam, Geographic Names Intarmation Systemflational Myaooraphy res(Dataset ind National Transportation Dataset: USGS Giobal Erosystems.U5. Cees

Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Eaith Data; US. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and, NOAA National Centers

ox Environmental information, US. Coastal Relief Model, Dataeftethed lune, 2022.

THOMPSON

ote

-£ji0

euitton J

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY - GEORGES FORK

DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY HAYSI (VA0067571) DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHROITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at Splash Dam Rd Haysi, VA 24256 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1980. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2007 and involved New RBCs, New clarifiers, doubling the capacity of the plant. The facility utilizes secondary treatment as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Dickenson County Haysi, Clinchco, and Centennial Height collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.1 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 195,984 gpd. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.231 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 250 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Russell Fork River.
Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by UMG. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 2 and 2 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 4 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of collection system issues.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Deterioration of equipment

DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY HAYSI

(VA0067571) DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHROITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description ~The treatment facility is located at Splash Dam Rd Haysi, VA 24256 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1980. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2007 and involved New RBCs, New clarifiers, doubling the capacity of the plant. The facility utilizes secondary treatment as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Dickenson County Haysi, Clinehco, and Centennial Height collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.1 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 195,984 gpd. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.231 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 250 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Russell Fork River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by UMG. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 2 and 2 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~The facility has had 4 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of collection system

ues.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Deterioration of equipment

John Flannadaft Reservoir

VIRGINIA

Residential | Pump Station |

Sewer Pump

| Station No. 3| New Camp/Car Wash | Pump Station

Clinchco Fire \

Department \

Pump Station

|— Gravity Main

Legend

[a] Treatment Plant [System Pump Station © Manhole

==* Force Main

Riverside Pump Station

Shifty Lane Pump Station

0 1,500 3,000 6,000 9,000

12,000

15,000

Feet

Mill Creek |

Pump Station |

Us@8 the National Map: National Soundaiies Dataset, 2DEP Elevation Program Geoatsphi

Dataset, Nat onal Lane Cov

Butea

IGERITine daty SFS

Hay

Bartley Pump Station

james Information systeni; National Hydrography Database, National Structures Datas Datasets USGS Clonal Feosystems; US. Census ié Data Natural Esty Datel USeDepartment of State Aurnanitartloringtair Uri 3nd NOAA National Centers

for Environmental information; U.S, Coastal Relief Model: Data refreshed lune, 2022

and National Tran

torron

THOMPSON

ANE ROUP

Emio

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY - CLINCHCO / HAYSI

DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY TRAMMEL
DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHROITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at main camp Trammel, VA 24273 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1991. The facility utilizes secondary treatment as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Dickenson County Trammel Community collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.02 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.004 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.005. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period.
Effluent from the plant is discharged to the McClure River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Dickenson County Public Service Authority. Currently, 2 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 2 and 1 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 1 hours/day 7 days a week.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Deterioration of equipment

DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY TRAMMEL DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHROITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at main camp Trammel, VA 24273 (see attached ‘general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1991. The facility utilizes secondary treatment as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteri The treatment facility receives sewage from the Dickenson County Trammel ‘Community collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.02 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.004 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0,005. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the McClure River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill,

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by Dickenson County Public Service Authority. Currently, 2 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 2 and 1 Class 3, The facility is required to be staffed 1 hours/day 7 days a week.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Deterioration of equipment

SHEET

7 =) DICKENSON COUNTY | __ SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA 7 PUBLIC SERVICE | COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL ‘lg LANE /

AUTHORITY - NORA SEWER STUDY 2022

THOMPSON & LITTON

{drography” JSCensus, hal Centers June, 2022.

DICKENSON COUNTY SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA saLDEQ PUBLIC SERVICE | COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL AUTHORITY - SEWER STUDY 2022 TRAMMEL

SHEET ar Pe

THOMPSON & LITTON

TOWN OF HONAKER (VA0026387) Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Honaker Wastewater Treatment System serves the Town of Honaker located in Russell County North of Rosedale along Route 80. The collection system was constructed in 1987.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

569 Residential Customers: 61 Commercial Customers: 630 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 84% residential and 16% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 2” force main and 6” & 8” gravity sewer. It is estimated that approximately 25% of the system consists of Terracotta pipe and approximately 30% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2010. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1987.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 4,232,000 4,065,200 96%

February 4,206,000 3,615,300 86%

March 5,236,000 3,903,300 75%

April 4,052,000 3,763,200 93%

May 2,737,000 3,954,100 144%

June 3,435,000 3,738,100 109%

July 2,483,000 4,464,800 180%

August 3,460,000 4,200,500 121%

September 3,111,000 4,047,600 130%

October 2,500,000 4,116,400 165%

November 2,785,000 3,797,500 136%

December 2,999,000 4,176,000 139%

Monthly Average 3,436,333 3,986,333 116%

Daily Average 112,975 131,074 116%

Avg / Customer 179 208

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Town of Honaker collection system had 9 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 9 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 0 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

 The system has had 14 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of EColi, ammonia, BOD, TSS limits being exceeded.

 The system is under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated June 2020 and was issued to address exceedances in permitted limits and addressing equipment and process improvements.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Outdated and old equipment failure.

TOWN OF HONAKER (VA0026387)

Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Town of Honaker Wastewater Treatment System serves the Town of Honaker located in Russell County North of Rosedale along Route 80. The collection system was constructed in 1987.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

569 Residential Customers: 61 Commercial Customers: 630 Total Number of Customers.

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 84% residential and 16% non- residential.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

jonth Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 4,232,000 4,065,200 96% February 4,206,000 3,615,300 86% Mareh 5,236,000 3,903,300 75% April 4,052,000 3,763,200 93% May 2,737,000 3,954,100 144% June 3,435,000 3,738,100 109% July 2,483,000 4,464,800 180% August 3,460,000 4,200,500 121% September 3,111,000 4,047,600 130% October 2,500,000 4,116,400 165% November 2,785,000 3,797,500 136% December 2,999,000 4,176,000 139% Monthly Average 3,436,333 3,986,333 116% Daily Average 112,975 131,074 116% Avg/ Customer 179 208

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Honaker collection system had 9 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year

9 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 0 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

The system is under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated June 2020 and was issued to address exceedances in permitted limits and addressing equipment and process improvements.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Outdated and old equipment failure.

System Needs

 Addressing Infiltration & Inflow,  Replacing aging equipment.

Sewer Use Ordinance: No ordinance

The system is not governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does not address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

SSES

No SSES has been done for the Town of Honaker.

Asset Management Plan

No Asset Management Plan has been done for the Town of Honaker.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified 2018:

Residential Commercial

In - Town In - Town

2500 gals $28.26 2500 gals $31.17

Out of Town Out of Town

2500 gals $38.89 2500 gals $40.96

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has:

VRA Loan at the wastewater plant (UV System) $167,531.72 (July 2022)

System Needs

Replacing aging equipment.

Sewer Use Ordinance: No ordinance

The system is not governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does not address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

SSES No SSES has been done for the Town of Honaker.

Asset Management Plan

No Asset Management Plan has been done for the Town of Honaker. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified 2018:

Residenti Commercial In- Town In- Town 2500 gals [$28.26 2500 gals | _ $31.17 Out of Town Out of Town 2500 gals L__ $38.89 2500 gals | _ $40.96

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has: VRA Loan at the wastewater plant (UV System) $167,531.72 (July 2022)

TOWN OF HONAKER– VPDES PERMIT # VA0026387 TOWN OF HONAKER Cumberland Plateau Planning Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 4259 Lewis Creek Rd (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1987. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2010 and involved removal of chlorine disinfection and changed to UV disinfection. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Honaker collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.4 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.105 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.152 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Lewis Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Honaker. Currently, 1 full time and 1 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 14 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of E.Coli, ammonia, BOD, and TSS limits being exceeded.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Outdated and old equipment failure.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 I&I,  Equipment replacement and improvements.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable project cost for the identified facility improvements is $1,364,416.

TOWN OF HONAKER- VPDES PERMIT # VA0026387 TOWN OF HONAKER Cumberland Plateau Planning Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 4259 Lewis Creek Rd (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1987. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2010 and involved removal of chlorine disinfection and changed to UV disinfection. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Honaker collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.4 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.105 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.152 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Lewis Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Honaker. Currently, 1 full time and I part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 14 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of E.Coli, ammonia, BOD, and TSS limits being exceeded

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Outdated and old equipment failure.

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows

Tal, Equipment replacement and improvements

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable project cost for the identified facility improvements is $1,364,416,

Legend

— Gravity Main S © Manhole

USGS The National Map: Natiorial Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geograpt}ic Names Information Sp Dataset, National Land Cover Database. National Structures Dataset. and National Transpoftation Dataset: USGS Glc Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S, Department of State Humarftarian Information Unit, for Environmental information, US, Coastal Relief Mode

TOWN OF LEBANON COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF LEBANON, VIRIGNIA Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Lebanon is located in Russell County, Virginia and provides public sewer service to 1,653 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits as well as some adjacent areas of Russell County. The sewage collection system includes approximately 32 +/- miles of 8”-18” gravity sewer lines and five (5) pump stations. The wastewater treatment plant has a permitted discharge capacity of 999,000 GPD. The collection system was constructed int eh 1970’s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1406 Residential Customers 247 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

1653 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 58% residential and 42% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 8” through 18” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2010. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970’s.

The area of Fields Avenue and South Angles Drive of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes five pump stations:

 Big Cedar Pump Station - The largest collection system pump station is the Big Cedar Pump Station located directly adjacent to Big Cedar Creek. This station receives flow from a 12” gravity sewer line serving the eastern part of the collection system. Two (2) 30-HP sewage pumps are provided, with a reported pumping rate of 410 GPM, discharging into an 8” force main. The pump motors and discharge piping are located in a room situated over top of the wetwell.

The pump station does not have an emergency generator. The pump station was originally constructed with backup diesel pump drivers, but they became inoperable and have been removed. The station was originally provided with a comminutor, but it became inoperable and has been removed. The pump station has a local high water alarm and a system that sends a text and email to notify of the alarm conditions. The station has 13 reported overflows during the 10-year period from 2010-2019. The station was constructed as part of the 1980 sewer improvements project.

 Gilbert Pump Station - The Gilbert (Jones Addition) Pump Station serves a residential subdivision located on the northeastern side of the collection system. The pump station and associated collection system were constructed as part of the Town’s 1980 sewer improvements project. The pump station was originally constructed as a pneumatic ejector type pump station. Town crews constructed a new submersible sewage pump station in 2017 and demolished/removed the original pump station.

The station includes two (2) 15.5 HP submersible sewage solids handling pumps with a design operating point of 150 GPM @ 119 ft TDH. The collection system into the pump station is an 8” gravity sewer and the discharge line a 4” force main. The station has a local high water alarm, but does not have telemetry or remote alarm notification. The stations does not have an emergency generator, but does have a connection for a portable generator. The station had 10 reported overflows during the 10-year period form 2010-2019

 Industrial Park Pump Station - The Industrial Park Pump Station is located at the intersection of Route 71 (Fincastle Road) and Clydesway Drive, on the western most portion of the Town’s sewer system. The pump station services the Russell County Industrial Park and those customers along Route 71. Original

TOWN OF LEBANON COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF LEBANON, VIRIGNIA Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Lebanon is located in Russell County, Virginia and provides public sewer service to 1,653 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits as well as some adjacent areas of Russell ‘County. The sewage collection system includes approximately 32 +/- miles of 8"-18" gravity sewer lines and five (5) pump stations. The wastewater treatment plant has a permitted discharge capacity of 999,000 Gpp. The collection system was constructed int eh 1970°s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1406 Residential Customers 247 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers

0 — Other Municipal Systems 1653 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 58% residential and 42% non- residential.

‘The collection system consists of 8” through 18” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2010. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970°s.

The area of Fields Avenue and South Angles Drive of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes five pump stations:

Big Cedar Pump Station - The largest collection system pump station is the Big Cedar Pump Station located directly adjacent to Big Cedar Creek. This station receives flow from a 12” gravity sewer line serving the eastern part of the collection system. Two (2) 30-HP sewage pumps are provided, with a reported pumping rate of 410 GPM, discharging into an 8” force main, The pump motors and discharge piping are located in a room situated over top of the wetwell.

© Gilbert Pump Station - The Gilbert (Jones Addition) Pump Station serves a residential subdivision located on the northeastern side of the collection system. The pump station and associated collection system were constructed as part of the Town’s 1980 sewer improvements project. The pump station was originally constructed as a pneumatic ejector type pump station. Town crews constructed a new submersible sewage pump station in 2017 and demolished/removed the original pump station.

«Industrial Park Pump Station - The Industrial Park Pump Station is located at the intersection of Route 71 (Fincastle Road) and Clydesway Drive, on the western most portion of the Town’s sewer system, The pump station services the Russell County Industrial Park and those customers along Route 71. Original

plans were not provided for this pump station. The pump station was constructed in about 1980, so is in excess of 40 years old. The capacity of the pump station is believed to be about 90 GPM.

The pump station lot is fenced and has two structures, a circular steel chamber housing the pneumatic ejector tanks and a separate metal building housing the compressors and electrical switchgear. The station does not have an emergency generator. The station had 7 reported overflows during the 10-year period from 2011-2020 with 4 of those occurring in 2020.

 Elliot Pump Station - Also known as the Bus Garage Pump Station, this pump station is located on State Route 658 (Big Cedar Creek Road). This station serves only two customers, the Town’s Water Treatment Plant and the Russell County Schools’ bus garage. As-Built plans were not provided for this pump station and only limited other information. The pump station is a submersible type pump station with two pumps and a small shelter for the controls. The reported pump delivery rate is approximately 170 GPM with discharge through a 4” force main. The pump station has a local high water alarm but does not have SCADA or remote alarm notification. An emergency generator is not provided. The pump station was constructed in 1999.

There have been 9 reported overflows at this pump station during the 10-year period from 2011-2020. It was indicated that the majority of those overflows were attributed to releasing too much water from the water treatment plant’s filter backwash and/or sludge dewatering basin.

 Manor Pump Stations - There are two (2) small grinder pump stations located in the Lebanon Manor subdivision near the southwest corner of the Town. As-Built plans were not provided for these pump stations and only limited other information is available.

Manor Pump Station No. 1 is located adjacent to Brumley Circle. The number of homes served by this pump station was not provided, but there are estimated to be about 15 +/- homes in close proximity to the pump station without direct access to the Town’s gravity sewer lines (based upon sewer mapping provided). This pump station reportedly has one (1) submersible sewage pump installed in a buried septic tank. DEQ requires pump stations serving more than one customer to have multiple pumps. The pump has a reported delivery rate of about 56 GPM. This pump station does not have a local alarm.

Manor Pump Station No. 2 is located adjacent to Woodland Drive. The number of homes served by this pump station was not provided but there are estimated to be about 10+/- homes in close proximity to the pump station without direct access to the Town’s gravity sewer lines (based upon sewer mapping provided). This pump station reportedly has two (2) submersible sewage pumps installed in a manhole wetwell. The pumps have a reported delivery rate of about 116 GPM. This pump station has a local alarm.

Neither of these pump stations has a fenced lot, nor a generator, nor SCADA, nor remote alarm indication. There have been no reported overflows at either of these pump stations in the past ten years The system does not collect flow from any other system.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Lebanon WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020745.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 20,004,400 6,791,963 33.9%

February 24,496,750 6,016,959 24.5%

March 27,130,400 6,114,649 22.5%

April 17,879,760 6,902,172 38.6%

May 15,093,510 10,687,820 70.8%

June 15,343,020 1,759,534 11.4%

July 14,970,820 7,422,759 49.5%

August 15,162,950 8,311,606 54.8%

September 12,797,630 6,401,314 50.0%

plans were not provided for this pump station, The pump station was constructed in about 1980, so is in excess of 40 years old. The capacity of the pump station is believed to be about 90 GPM.

Elliot Pump Station - Also known as the Bus Garage Pump Station, this pump station is located on State Route 658 (Big Cedar Creek Road). This station serves only two customers, the Town’s Water Treatment Plant and the Russell County Schools’ bus garage. As-Built plans were not provided for this pump station and only limited other information. The pump station is a submersible type pump station with two pumps and a small shelter for the controls. The reported pump delivery rate is approximately 170 GPM with discharge through a 4” force main. The pump station has a local high water alarm but does not have SCADA or remote alarm notification. An emergency generator is not provided. The pump station was constructed in 1999,

There have been 9 reported overflows at this pump station during the 10-year period from 2011-2020. It ‘was indicated that the majority of those overflows were attributed to releasing too much water from the ‘water treatment plant’s filter backwash and/or sludge dewatering basin.

Manor Pump Stations - There are two (2) small grinder pump stations located in the Lebanon Manor subdivision near the southwest comer of the Town. As-Built plans were not provided for these pump stations and only limited other information is available.

Manor Pump Station No. 1 is located adjacent to Brumley Circle. The number of homes served by this pump station was not provided, but there are estimated to be about 15 +/- homes in close proximity to the pump station without direct access to the Town’s gravity sewer lines (based upon sewer mapping provided). This pump station reportedly has one (1) submersible sewage pump installed in a buried septic tank, DEQ requires pump stations serving more than one customer to have multiple pumps. The pump has a reported delivery rate of about 56 GPM. This pump station does not have a local alarm.

Manor Pump Station No, 2 is located adjacent to Woodland Drive. The number of homes served by this pump station was not provided but there are estimated to be about 10+/- homes in close proximity to the pump station without direct access to the Town’s gravity sewer lines (based upon sewer mapping provided). This pump station reportedly has two (2) submersible sewage pumps installed in a manhole wetwell. The pumps have a reported delivery rate of about 116 GPM. This pump station has a local alarm,

Neither of these pump stations has a fenced lot, nor a generator, nor SCADA, nor remote alarm indication, There have been no reported overflows at either of these pump stations in the past fen years The system does not collect flow from any other system.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Lebanon WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020745.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 20,004,400 6,791,963 33.9% February 24,496,750 6,016,959 24.5% March 27,130,400 6,114,649 22.5% April 17,879,760 6,902,172 38.6% May 15,093,510 10,687,820 70.8% June 15,343,020 1,759,534 11.4% July 14,970,820 7,422,159 49.5% August 15,162,950 8,311,606 54.8%

September 12,797,630 6,401,314 50.0%

October 15,498,470 8,612,462 55.5%

November 12,275,510 6,267,795 51%

December 14,556,510 8,670,550 59.5%

Monthly Average 17,100,810 6,996,631 40.9%

Daily Average 570,027 233,221 40.9%

Avg / Customer 344.8 141

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The collection system had 2 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. __ were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 2 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Age of equipment and availability of replacement parts.

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.  Pump Station Rehabilitation/Replacements  Manhole Rehabilitation/Replacements  Line Replacement (both deteriorating and undersized)

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the entire area of the system in May, 2022 by The Lane Group. The SSES identified $3,069,700 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in May, 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2021

 Residential (in-town) - $19.00  Residential (out-of-town) - $31.00  Commercial (in-town) - $21.00  Commercial (out-of-town) - $36.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $3,069,700. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The wastewater system currently has no outstanding loans.

October 15,498,470 8,612,462 55.5%

November 12,275,510 6,267,795 51% December 14,556,510 8,670,550 59.5% Monthly Average 17,100,810 6,996,631 40.9% Daily Average 570,027 233,221 40.9% Avg/ Customer 344.8, 141

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The collection system had 2,reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. __ were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 2 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years,
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Age of equipment and availability of replacement parts. System Needs

Manhole Rehabilitation/Replacements
Line Replacement (both deteriorating and undersized)

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance d as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the entire area of the system in May, 2022 by The Lane Group. The SSES identified $3,069,700 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan ‘The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in May, 2022.

\ddress private side issues such

Sewer Rate Structure The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2021

Residential (in-town) - $19.00 Residential (out-of-town) - $31.00 ‘Commercial (in-town) - $21.00 ‘Commercial (out-of-town) - $36.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $3,069,700. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans ‘The wastewater system currently has no outstanding loans.

TOWN OF LEBANON WWTP – VPDES PERMIT #VA0020745 TOWN OF LEBANON, VIRGINIA Cumberland Plateau PDC

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 274 Haber Drive, Lebanon Virginia 24266 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1950. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1994 and involved increasing the capacity to .999 MGD. The facility utilizes conventional activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Lebanon collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is .999 MGD.
The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 729,031. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 918,142. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 40days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Big Cedar Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at the landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Lebanon. Currently two full time licensed operators work at the facility. One is a Class 1 while the other is a Class 3 operator. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day/7 days per week.

Permit Violations – The facility has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Age of equipment  Availability of replacement parts for existing equipment.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Replacement of Aeration Blowers & Yard Piping.  Replace Sludge Belt Press System.  Rehabilitate Secondary Treatment Units.  Rehabilitate Grit Collector  Rehabilitate Flow Splitter Assemblies.  Rehabilitate Primary Clarifiers.  Rehabilitate Aerobic Digesters  Rehabilitate Post-Aeration Tank.  Rehabilitate Plan Drain Pump Station.  Replace Backup Emergency Generator.  WWTP SCADA System.  Replacement of the Industrial Park Pump Station.  Rehabilitation of the Big Cedar Pump Station.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $6,715,000 (Including related costs and contingencies)

TOWN OF LEBANON WWTP - VPDES PERMIT #VA0020745 TOWN OF LEBANON, VIRGINIA Cumberland Plateau PDC

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 274 Haber Drive, Lebanon Virginia 24266 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1950. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1994 and involved increasing the capacity to .999 MGD. The facility utilizes conventional activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment,

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Lebanon collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 999 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 729,031. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 918,142. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 40days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Big Cedar Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at the landfill.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Lebanon, Currently two full time licensed operators work at the facility. One is a Class 1 while the other is a Class 3 operator. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day/7 days per week.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

jwipment of replacement parts for existing equipment.

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

Replacement of Aeration Blowers & Yard Piping. Replace Sludge Belt Press System.

Rehabilitate Secondary Treatment Units Rehabilitate Grit Collector

Rehabilitate Flow Splitter Assemblies. Rehabilitate Primary Clarifiers.

Rehabilitate Aerobic Digesters

Rehabilitate Post-Aeration Tank.

Rehabilitate Plan Drain Pump Station.

Replace Backup Emergency Generator.

WWTP SCADA System.

Replacement of the Industrial Park Pump Station. Rehabilitation of the Big Cedar Pump Station.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $6,715,000 (Including related costs and contingencies)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F LE

BA N

O N

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM /

[Ú

TPWW

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

¯ Legend

Manhole

[Ú Pump Station TPWW WWTP

Gravity Main

Force Main

Town Boundary

Industrial Park Pump Station Manor 2

Pump Station

Manor 1 Pump Station

Gilbert Pump Station

Cedar Creek Pump Station

Elliot Pump Station

Town of Lebanon Wastewater System

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022.

Legend

— Gravity Main ==> Force Main

Town Boundary

4° [industrial Park ‘| Pump Station

Manor 1 Pump Station

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

Se = Feet

‘Town of Lebanon Wastewater System

KA Manor 2

] Pump Station

Gilbert Pump Station

Cedar Creek

Ny Pump Station

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Pump Station

TOWN OF LEBANON WASTEWATER SYSTEM

USGS The Nation! Map: National Boundtes Ostet, 308? elevation Prom, Geographic

Names Information Sytem, National Hydrogtaphy Dataset, National Land Cover Oats,

Nation! Structures Dataset and National Tanportation Dataset; USGS Global Eeowystems:| [ETT PSST US. Consus Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Oats; Natural Earth Data; US Department | Fee

‘of State Humanitarian Information Unt; and NOAA Natenal Centers for Environmental =

Information, US. Coastal Relief Model Data reftese une, 2022,

TOWN OF TAZEWELL – VPDES PERMIT #VA0026298 TOWN OF TAZEWELL Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 618 Titis Rd, Tazewell, VA 24651 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1964. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1990 and involved reconstruction of the wastewater plant. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Tazewell collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 2.0 MGD.
The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.893 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 1.514 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 34 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Clinch River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Tazewell. Currently, 4 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 1, 1 Class 2, 1 Class 3, and 1 Class 4.
The facility is required to be staffed 10 hours/day M-F and 8 hours/day Sat-Sun.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Aging equipment

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Pumps,  Electrical issues,  UV.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $8,091,660.

Improvement Cost New Influent Pump Station $500,000 Mechanical Screen and Compactor $240,000 Vortex Grit System $370,000 Rehabilitate Primary Clarifier $100,000 Primary Sludge Pumps $36,000 Aeration Basin Diffuser System $120,000 Aeration Basin Blowers $260,000 Aeration Basin Structural Modifications $5,000 Aeration Basin Mixers $60,000 DO and pH/ORP Meters @ Aeration Basins $34,000 MLSS Recirc. Pump Station & Piping $330,000 Rehabilitate Secondary Clarifiers $140,000

TOWN OF TAZEWELL — VPDES PERMIT #VA0026298 TOWN OF TAZEWELL Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 618 Titis Rd, Tazewell, VA 24651 (see attached ‘general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1964. The last major upgrade/expansion ‘was completed in 1990 and involved reconstruction of the wastewater plant. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Tazewell collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 2.0 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.893 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 1.514 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 34 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Clinch River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill,

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Tazewell. Currently, 4 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 1, 1 Class 2, 1 Class 3, and 1 Class 4, The facility is required to be staffed 10 hours/day M-F and 8 hours/day Sat-Sun,

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Aging equipment

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Electrical issues, « UV.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the

identified facility improvements is $8,091,660. Improvement Cost ‘New Influent Pump Station $500,000 Mechanical Sereen and Compactor $240,000 Vortex Grit System $370,000 Rehabilitate Primary Clarifier $100,000 Primary Sludge Pumps $36,000 ‘Aeration Basin Diffuser System $120,000 ‘Aeration Basin Blowers $260,000 Aeration Basin Structural Modifications $5,000 ‘Acration Basin Mixers $60,000 DO and pH/ORP Meters @ Aeration Basins $34,000 MLSS Recire. Pump Station & Pi $330,000 Rehabilitate Secondary Clarifiers $140,000

RAS Pumps $136,000 WAS Pumps $36,000 Tertiary Disc Filter Rehabs $200,000 UV Disinfection System $308,000 Digester Diffuser System $130,000 Digester Blowers $330,000 New Telescopic Valves at Digesters $30,000 Processed Sludge Pumps $42,000 Non-potable Water Pumps $14,000 Sump Pumps at Grit & Secondaries $42,000 Dewatering Bldg. Roll-Up Door & Electrical $15,000 Biosolids Storage Building $180,000 Replace Plant Flow Meters $100,000 Replace Pressure Gauges $20,000 Yard Piping $760,000 Valve & Gate Replacements $380,000 New Automatic Samplers $30,000 Bypass Pumping during Construction $30,000 Electrical & Controls $1,010,000 SCADA Update $50,000 Demolish Existing Biosolids Storage Bldg. $20,000 Rehab. Allowance for Concrete Structures $100,000 Total $8,091,660

RAS Pumps $136,000 WAS Pumps $36,000 Tertiary Disc Filter Rehabs $200,000 UV Disinfection System. $308,000 Digester Diffuser System $130,000 Digester Blowers $330,000 ‘New Telescopic Valves at Digesters $30,000 Processed Sludge Pumps $42,000 ‘Non-potable Water Pumps $14,000 Sump Pumps at Grit & Secondaries $42,000 Dewatering Bldg. Roll-Up Door & Electrical $15,000 Biosolids Storage Buildin; $180,000 Replace Plant Flow Meters $100,000 Replace Pressure Gauges $20,000 Yard Piping $760,000 Valve & Gate Replacements $380,000 New Automatic Samplers $30,000 Bypass Pumping during Construction $30,000 Electrical & Controls, $1,010,000 SCADA Update $50,000 Demolish Existing Biosolids Storage Bldg. $20,000 Rehab. Allowance for Conerete Structures $100,000

Total

$8,091,660

Blacks Chapel Road Pump Station

euitton J

THOMPSON

fae cs Ramey wa. Pump Station z-

to}

ote

gio

Dry Town Pump Statior

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF TAZEWELL

Legend

[a2 Treatment Plant

© <0 1H system Pump Station SS J a @ Manhole ee — Gravity Main a fore == == Force Main : USGS Thie National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hjdrogspiimemne | |"

SHEET

Dataset, National tand Cover Database, National Structures Oataset, and National Transportation Dataset: USGS Global Ecosysteini

Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Farth Data; U.S, Department of State Humanitarian Informatio® Unik agNOAR National Centeis

L-10 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 for Environmental information, US. CoastaliReli Wedel, Datafefreshed June 2022 ee Ps

_————— ————— —_A aoe =

TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY CLAYPOOL HILL – VPDES PERMIT # VA0064271 TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 843 Wardell Rd, Pounding Mill, VA 24639 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in November 2015. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2015 and involved shutting down the old plant and constructing the new one. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Claypool Hill and Wardell collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.7 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.234 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.321 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period.
Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Little River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Tazewell County Public Service Authority. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 2 and 1 Class 4. The facility is required to be staffed 10 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 I&I from ground water,

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Upkeep of operation equipment,  I&I.

TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY CLAYPOOL

HILL — VPDES PERMIT # VA0064271 TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description ~The treatment facility is located at 843 Wardell Rd, Pounding Mill, VA 24639 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in November 2015. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2015 and involved shutting down the old plant and constructing the new one. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Claypool Hill and Wardell collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.7 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.234 MGD. ‘The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.321 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Little River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by the Tazewell County Public Service

Authority. Currently, 3 full and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 2 and 1 Class 4. The facility is required tobe sated 10 hours.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues

experienced by the facility are as follows:

1&1 from ground water,

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Upkeep of operation equipment,

=| Pump Station No. na N

Pump Station No. 3

Pump Station No. 2

Lit ity

Pump Station No. 1

WH DUNES TALS

Legend

{S] Treatment Plant

[System Pump Station | pint © Manhole == Force Main — Gravity Main oO 1,500 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000

VU a 2 Feet

Rite

VIRGINIA

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Datas6®| SEP Elevation Hifam, Geoigealve Names Iitormation System, National Nydregraphy/ <, Dataset, National Land Cover-Database, National Stictures Dataset, and Natigfal Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems: U.S. Census Greau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Dat; Natal Earth Data U.S. Departmeédlldf Stale Hunlantatian Information Unit ane NOAA National Centers

for Enifoiiental formation U.S. Coastal Reiét Made, Data refreshed June, 2022.

euitton J

THOMPSON

ANE ROUP

-£ji0o

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY - CLAYPOOL HILL

TAZEWELL COUNTY

TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY FALLS MILLS– VPDES PERMIT #VA0062561 TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 203 Brush Fork Rd, Falls Mills, VA 24613 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1986. The facility utilizes Rotating Biological Contactor as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Falls Mills collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.25 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.104 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.103 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 8 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Blue Stone River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Tazewell County Public Service Authority. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Pump failure,  Metal deterioration.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 UV light disinfection,  New Imhoff tank.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $800,000.

Improvement Cost Replacement of Circulation Pump $150,000 Replacement of Blowers $200,000 Replacement of Emergency Generator $450,000 Total $800,000

TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY FALLS MILLS—

VPDES PERMIT #VA0062561 TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description ~The treatment facility is located at 203 Brush Fork Rd, Falls Mil attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1986, The facility utilizes Rotating Biological Contactor as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Falls Mills collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.25 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.104 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.103 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 8 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Blue Stone River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill,

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by Tazewell County Public Service Authority. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility — The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

New Imhoff tank.

inion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $800,000.

Improvement Cost

Replacement of Circulation Pump. $150,000 Replacement of Blowers $200,000 Replacement of Emergency Generator $450,000 Total $800,000

Pump Station 1

Legend

{S] Treatment Plant [System Pump Station — Gravity Main ==> Force Main

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 a Feet

USGS The-National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Ge6graphic Names Information S)stem, Natichal Hydrography

Dataset National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset, USGS, Global Ecosysterns; US. Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S: Department of State Humanitarian Information Units and NOAA Nationa for Environmental Information, US. Coastal Relief Model, Data refreshed June, 2022,

euitton J

THOMPSON

ANE ROUP

£ji0

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY - FALLS MILLS

[TAZEWELL COUNTY

TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY NORTHERN TAZEWELL – VPDES PERMIT #VA0091588 TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 2748 Rosenbaum Rd, Bluefield VA 24605 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 2007. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2007 and involved construction of the facility. The facility utilizes Sequencing Batch Reactors as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Pocahontas, Pocahontas State Corrections, and Boissevain collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.5 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.223 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.33 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 20 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Laurel Fork. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Tazewell County Public Service Authority. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Pump failures.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Better sludge handling equipment.

TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY NORTHERN

TAZEWELL — VPDES PERMIT #VA0091588 TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission

Facility Description ~The treatment facility is located at 2748 Rosenbaum Rd, Bluefield VA 24605 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 2007. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2007 and involved construction of the facility. The facility utilizes Sequencing Batch Reactors as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Pocahontas, Pocahontas State Corrections, and Boissevain collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.5 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.223 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.33 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 20 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Laurel Fork. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Tazewell County Public Service ‘Authority. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues

experienced by the facility are as follows: © Pump failures,

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Better sludge handling equipment,

Pocahontas #2 Pump Station

wwTP Pump Station

Legend

[System Pump Station [i] Treatment Plant © Manhole — Gravity Main == Force Main

0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 3,000

a eed Feet

Pocahontas

Pocahontas #1 Pump Station

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Mydrography

Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; US Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; US: Department of State Humanitarian Information Unity and NOAA Natiohal Centers for Environmental information, US. Coastal Relief Model, Datatefreshed lune, 2022.

ote

£ji0

THOMPSON

euitton J

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

AUTHORITY - NORTHERN TAZEWELL

TAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE

COUNTY

Town of Richlands Wastewater System

Legend

@ Manhole — Gravity Main Treatment Plant — Gravity Main

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

a eed Feet

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Progra Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and Nati Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; US: Department of | for Environmental

[Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography

Transportation Dataset; USGS Giobal Ecosystems; US, Census Hale Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers imation, U.S. Coastal Relief Model, Datalrefreshed June, 2022.

ree

euitton J

THOMPSON

ANE ROUP

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF CEDAR BLUFF

ae ‘cine

VIRGINIA

Legend

— Gravity Main © Manhole — Gravity Main

a Treatment Pane

0 750 1,500 3,000

4,500

6,000

a = Feet

Richlands ‘ 0 ae bY :

‘Town of Cedar Bluff Wastewater System

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Pragram, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrapraphy Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Strictures Oafaset, and National Transportation Dataset USGS Global Ecosystems US. Census

Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Eaith Dataj U.S, Department of State Humenitatian information Unit; and NOAA National Centers

Aenoveret for Environmental infortiation, US. Coastal Relief Medel, Data refreshed-hune, 2022

euitton J

THOMPSON

ANE ROUP

£ji0

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF RICHLANDS

SHEET

( z

z~<K o

f K : Wa. ‘ > < School ote Pump Station S10

euitton J

a ts Bok = v. ae 1 SSa 2a 558 wa ex, zud bes BE goa zoe FuUS eer eS ea ‘Town of St. Paul Quarry 8 = 2 Pump Station Pump Station S \ Village >) 1 Pump Station gi, \ Bp 25 a & 8 E29 soa Ofna Owe Industrial Drive ag 3 Pump Station ae Su z

Legend

1B system Pump Station @ = Manhole

— Gravity Main

Force Main

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 ee Feet

{USGS The National Mag: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Prograrn Geographic Name Informatio ster, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Gover Database, Nationa Stnytures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset. USGS/Giobal Ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Lne dat USFS Road Data; Natufl Earth Dalai UiS»Department of State Humanitariah Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Frvironmental information, US. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed dune, 2022

Dante

Legend ‘ {S] Treatment Plant [System Pump Station o @ = Manhole — Gravity Main === Force Main oO 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

a = Feet

.) Pump Station E H 4

=<2->

USGS The Nationa: Dataset, Nationa) Bureau TIGER/Line date U

National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEI

S Read D

ion Program, Geographic Names Information)

tem, National Hydrography

taBase, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Datasetil/SGS Giobal Ecosystems; US.Cersus 2; Natural Earth Data: US. Department of Stale Humanitarianiinformation Unit; and NOAA National Centers fot Environmental Information, US. Coastal Relie! Medel. Data refreshed June, 2022.

aLitton J

THOMPSON

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

EY ie Sew Owe & 43"%O2 TOTS naea Yur Sac af

APPENDIX A

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS AND MAPS

APPENDIX A

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS AND MAPS

TOWN OF APPALACHIA COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF APPALACHIA Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Appalachia wastewater collection system services within the town corporate limits and the former coal camp communities of Andover and Inman. The town is located along U.S. BUS 23 in the Western portion of Wise County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of cast iron, terra cotta, asphalt felt and PVC. Virtually all in- and out-of-town residents and businesses near sewer services rely on the Town’s gravity system for wastewater treatment.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

671 Residential Customers 38 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 1 Other Municipal Systems

710 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 75% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 75% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2011. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1940’s.

No areas within the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

 Appalachia Pump Station – Triplex suction lift sewer pump station serving the Town of Appalachia service area. It operates to convey sewage flows ranging from 0.25 MGD minimum to 1.1 MGD maximum directly to the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Pump Station is located within the Town of Appalachia corporate limits at the intersection of W. Main St. and S. Inman St.

The system also collects flow from the Wise County Public Service Authority system.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Big Stone Gap system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020940).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the Appalachia Pump Station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 4,092,101 2,008,413 49%

February 4,092,101 2,168,258 53%

March 4,092,101 2,100,903 51%

April 4,092,101 2,626,710 64%

May 4,092,101 2,165,121 53%

June 4,092,101 3,075,596 75%

July 4,092,101 2,787,451 68%

August 4,092,101 2,916,257 71%

September 4,092,101 2,848,980 70%

October 4,092,101 2,330,936 57%

November 4,092,101 2,247,520 55%

December 4,092,101 2,283,570 56%

TOWN OF APPALACHIA COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF APPALACHIA, Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Appalachia wastewater collection system services within the town corporate limits and the former coal camp communities of Andover and Inman. The town is located along U.S. BUS 23 in the Western portion of Wise County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of cast iron, terra cotta, asphalt felt and PVC. Virtually all in- and out-of-town residents and businesses near sewer services rely on the Town’s gravity system for wastewater treatment,

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

671 Residential Customers

38 Commercial Customers

0 Industrial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 710 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer bil residential.

ings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non-

‘The collection system consists of 6” through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 75% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 75% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2011. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1940°s.

No areas within the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes one pump station:

Appalachia Pump Station — Triplex suction lift sewer pump station serving the Town of Appalachia service area, It operates to convey sewage flows ranging from 0.25 MGD minimum to 1.1 MGD maximum directly to the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Pump Station is located within the Town of Appalachia corporate limits at the intersection of W. Main St, and S, Inman St.

The system also collects flow from the Wise County Public Service Authority system. Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Big Stone Gap system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the

Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020940)

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the Appalachia Pump Station, A summary of the system’ collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 4,092,101 2,008,413 49% February 4,092,101 2,168,258 53% March 4,092,101 2,100,903 51% 4,092,101 2,626,710 64% 4,092,101 2,165,121 53% June 4,092,101 3,075,596 75% July 4,092,101 2,787,451 68% August 4,092,101 2,916,257 1% September 4,092,101 2,848,980 10% October 4,092,101 2,330,936 57% November 4,092,101 2,247,520 55%

December 4,092,101 2,283,570 56%

Monthly Average 4,092,101 2,463,310 60%

Daily Average 134,535 80,985 60%

Avg / Customer 189 114

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Town of Appalachia collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.  The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration and Inflow

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system does not currently have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system currently does not have an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in June 2021:

Inside Town Limits Outside Town Limits Water - $15.25 (First 1,000 gallons) Water - $20.60 (First 1,000 gallons)
Each additional 1,000 gallons - $5.90 Each additional 1,000 gallons - $9.15 Sewer Rate – 135% of Water Fee Sewer Rate – 135% of Water Fee

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $175,000 in outstanding loan.

Monthly Average 4,092,101 2,463,310 60% Daily Average 134,535 80,985 60% Avg / Customer 189 14

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Appalachia collection system had (reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system does not currently have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system currently does not have an asset management plan prepared. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in June 2021:

Inside Town Limits Outside Town Limits

Water - $15.25 (First 1,000 gallons) Water - $20.60 (First 1,000 gallons) Each additional 1,000 gallons - $5.90 Each additional 1,000 gallons - $9.15 Sewer Rate ~ 135% of Water Fee Sewer Rate ~ 135% of Water Fee

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD.

‘System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $175,000 in outstanding loan.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/15/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F AP

PA LC

H IA

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

N O

RT H

AR EA

[Ú USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022.

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

¯ Wise County Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

Town of Appalachia Wastewater System

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Wise County Force Main

Town Boundary

Force Main to Big Stone Gap

Appalachia Pump Station

Wise County Wastewater System

a Feet

500

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

Force Main to Big Stone Gap

Wise County Wastewater System

Town of Appalachia Wastewater System

‘Appalachia Pump Station

Legend Pump Station @ = Manhole == Force Main — Gravity Main Wise County Force Main

Town Boundary

USGS The National Map: National Soundaies Dataset, 30EP elevation Program Geographic Names Information System, Natonal Hydrography Date, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Datacet, and National Transportation Ostset; USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data USFS Road Oat; Natural Earth Dates US Department of State Humanitarian Information Unt and NORA National Center

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WASTEWATER AREA

TOWN OF APPALCHIA SYSTEM - NORTH

= K

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/15/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F AP

PA LC

H IA

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

S O

U TH

AR EA

TPWW

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Wise County Wastewater System

Town of Appalachia Wastewater System

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Wise County Force Main

[Ú Big Stone Gap Pump Station

Big Stone Gap Force Main

TPWW Big Stone Gap WWTP

Big Stone Gap Manhole

Big Stone Gap Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater System

Appalachia Pump Station

Legend [Pump Station @ Manhole

<== Force Main

— Gravity Main

= =+ Wise County Force Main

Tl Big Stone Gap Pump Station

==» Big Stone Gap Force Main

(HB Big stone Gap WwTP © Big Stone Gap Manhole

— Big Stone Gap Gravity Main

~! Town Boundary

‘Appalachia Pump Station

Wise County Wastewater System

1,000 2,000

4,000

“Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater System

es eh bis ital eines baa 206 on rowan

Geographic Names lnormation Stem, Natonal Hydrography Dataset, Nationa Land Cover Database, ional structures Dataset, and Nabonal Transportation Dataset USGS Global Ecosystey US. Census Bureau TIGERMine data USFS Road Oat; Natural Earth

Data; US. Depgfment of State Humantarian Informatio Unit and NOAA National Centers for tnvironmghtaliniormatian US. Cait Reliet Model Oat refreshed lune, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF APPALCHIA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - SOUTH AREA

TOWN OF BIG STONE GAP COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF BIG STONE GAP Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Big Stone Gap wastewater collection system serves the incorporated Town of Big Stone Gap located along U.S. ALT 23 in the Southwestern portion of Wise County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of cast iron, terra cotta, asphalt felt and PVC. The town’s wastewater treatment plant is located on the western side of town along the Powell River. The treatment plant utilizes an aerobic digestion treatment system with a 4 million gallon per day (MGD) capacity.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

2,332 Residential Customers 240 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 1 Other Municipal Systems

2,573 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 91% residential and 9% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2010. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1960’s.

No areas of the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes six (6) pump stations:

 Artesian #1 Pump Station – Sewer pump station serving the Artesian Well Hollow community, just outside the Town of Big Stone Gap eastern corporate limits. The station discharges sewer to the Artesian #2 Pump Station.

 Artesian #2 Pump Station – Serves the Artesian Well Hollow community, just outside the Town of Big Stone Gap eastern corporate limits. The sewer pump station discharges into a manhole located along Wampler Hollow Rd. in East Stone Gap.

 Shawnee Ave. Pump Station – Serves a small area along Shawnee Ave. in downtown Big Stone Gap. The station is designed to handle flows up to 9 gpm. The pump station discharges into a manhole located behind the Town of Big Stone Gap Fire Hall, which is conveyed to the Aviation Road Pump Station.

 Maloney’s Pump Station – Serves a small community just outside the western Town of Big Stone Gap corporate limits. The duplex sewer pump station is designed to handle flows up to 240 gpm The pump station discharges directly into the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.

 Cadet Pump Station – Serves the Cadet community within the Town of Big Stone Gap. The duplex sewer pump station is designed to handle flows up to 50 gpm. The pump station discharges directly into the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.

 Aviation Road Pump Station – A triplex sewer pump system that serves the entire downtown area of the Town of Big Stone Gap. The station is designed to handle flows up to 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm). The pump station discharges directly into the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The system also collects flow from the Town of Appalachia system.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020940).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Big Stone Gap Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

TOWN OF BIG STONE GAP COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF BIG STONE GAP Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Big Stone Gap wastewater collection system serves the incorporated Town of Big Stone Gap located along U.S. ALT 23 in the Southwestern portion of Wise County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of cast iron, terra cotta, asphalt felt and PVC. The town’s wastewater treatment plant is located on the western side of town along the Powell River. The treatment plant utilizes an aerobic digestion treatment system with a 4 million gallon per day (MGD) capacity.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

2,332 Residential Customers 240 Commercial Customers

0 Industrial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 2,373 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer bil residential.

ings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 91% residential and 9% non-

‘The collection system consists of 4” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2010. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1960’s.

No areas of the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes six (6) pump stations:

Artesian #1 Pump Station — Sewer pump station serving the Artesian Well Hollow community, just outside the Town of Big Stone Gap eastern corporate limits. The station discharges sewer to the Artesian #2 Pump Station,
Artesian #2 Pump Station ~ Serves the Artesian Well Hollow community, just outside the Town of Big Stone Gap eastern corporate limits. The sewer pump station discharges into a manhole located along Wampler Hollow Rad. in East Stone Gap.

Shawnee Ave. Pump Station ~ Serves a small area along Shawnee Ave. in downtown Big Stone Gap. The station is designed to handle flows up to 9 gpm. ‘The pump station discharges into a manhole located behind the Town of Big Stone Gap Fire Hall, which is conveyed to the Aviation Road Pump Station.
Maloney’s Pump Station ~ Serves a small community just outside the western Town of Big Stone Gap corporate limits. The duplex sewer pump station is designed to handle flows up to 240 gpm The pump ation discharges directly into the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Cadet Pump Station ~ Serves the Cadet community within the Town of Big Stone Gap. The duplex sewer pump station is designed to handle flows up to 50 gpm. The pump station discharges directly into the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Aviation Road Pump Station ~ A triplex sewer pump system that serves the entire downtown area of the Town of Big Stone Gap. The station is designed to handle flows up to 2,000 gallons per minute (gpm). The pump station discharges directly into the Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The system also collects flow from the Town of Appalachia system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020940). System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Big

Stone Gap Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 58,696,817 11,976,100 20.4%

February 72,613,488 10,378,700 14.3%

March 69,352,756 10,468,400 15.1%

April 36,551,220 9,985,400 27.3%

May 26,798,245 10,774,643 40.2%

June 25,323,800 11,713,283 46.3%

July 24,913,312 11,416,620 45.8%

August 31,430,288 11,420,614 36.3%

September 25,334,394 11,133,862 44.0%

October 26,615,828 11,382,631 42.8%

November 22,843,494 9,764,213 42.7%

December 31,853,295 11,833,179 37.2%

Monthly Average 37,693,911 11,020,637 29.2%

Daily Average 1,239,252 362,322 29.2%

Avg / Customer 482 141

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Town of Big Stone Gap collection system had 31 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 19 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 12 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.  The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the Town of Big Stone Gap sewer system in May 2021 by The Lane Group, Inc. The SSES identified $13,860,663 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $1,203,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Inside Town Limits Outside Town Limits 0-1,000 Gallons - $20.74 0-1,000 Gallons - $35.29 1,001 Gal. or More - $6.22 1,001 Gal. or More - $9.92

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 58,696,817 11,976,100 20.4% February 72,613,488 10,378,700 14.3% March 69,352,756 10,468,400 15.1% April 36,551,220 9,985,400 27.3% May 26,798,245 10,774,643 40.2% June 25,323,800 11,713,283 46.3% July 24,913,312 11,416,620 43.8% August 31,430,288 11,420,614 36.3% September 25,334,394 11,133,862 44.0% October 26,615,828 11,382,631 42.8% November 22,843,494 9,764,213 42.7% December 31,853,295 11,833,179 37.2% Monthly Average 37,693,911 11,020,637 29.2% Daily Average 1,239,252 362,322 29.2% Avg / Customer 482 141

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Big Stone Gap collection system had 31 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 19 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 12 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years,
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES ‘A SSES was performed on the Town of Big Stone Gap sewer system in May 2021 by The Lane Group, Inc. The SSES identified $13,860,663 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $1,203,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan The system does not have an asset management plan prepared. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Inside Town Limits Outside Town Limits 0-1,000 Gallons - $20.74 0-1,000 Gallons - $35.29 1,001 Gal. or More - $6.22 1,001 Gal. or More - $9.92

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $15,063,963.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $3,585,890.00 in outstanding loan.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $15,063,963.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $3,585,890.00 in outstanding loan,

BIG STONE GAP REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT – VPDES PERMIT #VA0020940 TOWN OF BIG STONE GAP Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 1572 2nd Ave. W. in Big Stone Gap, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1964. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2009 and involved expanding the plant to 4.0 MGD capacity with additions and upgrades to the pretreatment building, influent pump station, activated sludge basin, secondary clarifier, UV disinfection and cascade aerator. The facility utilizes aerobic digestion as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Big Stone Gap and Town of Appalachia collection systems. The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 4.0 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.575 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 2.23 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 52 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Powell River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of through drying beds and hauled to the land fill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Big Stone Gap. Currently, 4 full time and 4 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 4 Class 1, 2 Class 2 and 1 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 1 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of aeriation and effluent.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Continuous maintenance and repair of aged equipment
 Difficulty of obtaining repair parts

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Electrical upgrades to Pre-treatment Building  Upgrade and Repair Oxidation Ditch  Install New Belt Press

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $TBD.

BIG STONE GAP REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT — VPDES PERMIT #VA0020940

TOWN OF BIG STONE GAP

Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 1572 2 Ave. W. in Big Stone Gap, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1964. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2009 and involved expanding the plant to 4.0 MGD capacity with additions and upgrades to the pretreatment building, influent pump station, activated sludge basin, secondary clarifier, UV disinfection and cascade aerator. The facility utilizes aerobic digestion as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Big Stone Gap and Town of Appalachia collection systems. The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 4.0 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.575 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 2.23 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 52 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Powell River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of through drying beds and hauled to the land fill

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Big Stone Gap. Currently, 4 full time and 4 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 4 Class 1, 2 Class 2 and 1 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 1 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of aeriation and effluent.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility — The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Electrical upgrades to Pre-treatment Building © Upgrade and Repair Oxidation Ditch
Install New Belt Press

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is STD.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F BI

G ST

O N

E G

AP W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

TPWW

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater System

Legend TPWW WWTP

[Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Appalachia Force Main

Town Boundary

Force Main from Town of Appalachia

Town of Appalachia Wastewater System

Artesian #2 Pump Station

Artesian #1 Pump Station

Cadet Pump Station

Aviation Road Pump StationMaloney

Pump Station

Shawnee Ave Pump Station

Legend fa wwe

[Pump Station == Force Main

@ Manhole — Gravity Main

Appalachia Force Main

Town Boundary

Maloney

Pump statin PL———> [af

Cadet Pump Station

‘Town of Appalachia Wastewater System

‘Shawnee Ave Pump Station

‘J ‘Aviation Road

Pump Station

100

8,000

Force Main from Town of Appalachia

‘Artesian #1 iat Pump Station Fon

Town of Big Stone Gap Wastewater System

‘Artesian #2 Pump Station

USGS. The National Map National Soundaries Dataset, 30EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, Nasional Myarograpty Ostet, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and Navona! Transportation Dataset; USGS Gaba Ecosystems US. Census Bureau TIGER dats USFS Raad Oata; Naural Earth Data; US. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unt and NOAA National Centers fr Environmental lformation US. Coastal elf Model Osta effeshed une, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF BIG STONE GAP WASTEWATER SYSTEM

= a

CNW REGIONAL WWTP– VPDES PERMIT #VA0077828 COEBURN-NORTON-WISE REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AUTHORITY LENOWISCO PDC

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 4123 CNW Road, Coeburn, Virginia 24230. (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1991. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2015 and involved:

 Two new fine mechanical screens to process a peak hour influent flow of 15 MGD.  Upgrade of the influent pump station to a peak hour pumping rate of 15 MGD.  Implementation of integrated fixed film activated sludge in the existing oxidation ditch to

reduce the solids load on the secondary clarifies.  Pilot study on the disinfection system to implement disinfection on a CT basis to avoid

costly expansion of the chlorine contact tanks.  Return activated sludge pumping improvements.  Installation of a rotary drum thickener to pre-thicken the waste activated sludge prior to

aerobic digestion.  Aerobic digester upgrades with new mixing and heating utilizing a geothermal heat pump

and the effluent flow.  Expansion of the administrative/laboratory building.  Installation of generators for standby power.  System-wide SCADA system.

The facility utilizes Secondary (Oxidation Ditch) as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Coeburn, City of Norton, Town of Wise, and the Wise County Board of Supervisors collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 6.5 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 3.7 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 5.4 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 44 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Guest River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by land application however the Wise County landfill is also permitted.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Coeburn-Norton-Wise Regional Waste Water Treatment Authority. Currently, seven full time licensed operators work at the facility along with three full time operator trainees. 7 Class 1, 0 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 20 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Increasing difficulty in obtaining repair parts for existing equipment, especially for items manufactured in foreign countries.

 Increasing difficulty in obtaining operational chemicals and other supplies.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Improved system for digester aerating and mixing.

CNW REGIONAL WWTP- VPDES PERMIT #VA0077828 COEBURN-NORTON-WISE REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AUTHORITY LENOWISCO PDC.

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 4123 CNW Road, Coeburn, Virginia 24230. (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1991. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2015 and involved:

Two new fine mechanical screens to process a peak hour influent flow of 15 MGD.

Upgrade of the influent pump station to a peak hour pumping rate of 15 MGD.
Implementation of integrated fixed film activated sludge in the existing oxidation ditch to reduce the solids load on the secondary clarifies.
Pilot study on the disinfection system to implement costly expansion of the chlorine contact tanks.
Return activated sludge pumping improvements.
Installation of a rotary drum thickener to pre-thicken the waste activated sludge prior to aerobic digestion.
Aerobic digester upgrades with new mixing and heating utilizing a geothermal heat pump and the effluent flow.

Expansion of the administrative/laboratory building,

Installation of generators for standby power.
System-wide SCADA system.

fection on a CT basis to avoid

The facility utilizes Secondary (Oxidation Ditch) as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Coeburn, City of Norton, Town of Wise, and the Wise County Board of Supervisors collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 6.5 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 3.7 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 5.4 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 44 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Guest

River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by land application however the Wise County landfill is also permitted.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by the Coeburn-Norton-Wise Regional Waste Water Treatment Authority. Currently, seven full time licensed operators work at the facility along with three full time operator trainees. 7 Class 1, 0 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 20 hours/day.

Permit Violat

‘The fac

ty has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility — The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

«Increasing difficulty in obtaining repair parts for existing equipment, especially for items manufactured in foreign countries

Increasing difficulty in obtaining operational chemicals and other supplies.

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Improved system for digester aerating and mixing.

 Improved systems for removal of screenings and grit  improved SCADA system with maintenance and laboratory software.  Improved splitter box screening system.  Upgrade hoists & other material handling.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $______________. (Include tale breakdown if possible)

Improved systems for removal of screenings and grit improved SCADA system with maintenance and laboratory software. Improved splitter box screening system.

Upgrade hoists & other material handling.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is § . (Include tale breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/28/2022

IJR

2248

CN W

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

E AS

T /

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

CNW Wastewater System

Legend Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Wise County Manhole

Wise County Gravity Main

[Ú Coeburn Pump Station

Coeburn Manhole

Coeburn Gravity Main

Coeburn Force Main

Town Boundary

Wise County Wastewater System

Coeburn Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

Legend

@ = Manhole

== Force Main — Gravity Main @ Wise County Manhole 0 —— Wise County Gravity Main [El _ Coeburn Pump Station ° @ Coeburn Manhole Coeburn Gravity Main Coeburn Force Main g

‘Town Boundary

A), Shy

Wise County ‘Wastewater System

y = CNW . Wastewater System

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 ect

Wise County Wastewater System

Coeburn Wastewater System

Information Sater, Nationa Hydrography Oataet,

foal Land Cover Databe,

‘Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset USGS Global Ecowstems:

tA Sgt

us Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Oat; Natura

fh Unit; and NOAA National Centers for

1 totormation Us Coastal bet Model Data efteshed ne, 2022

7 | £ The National Map: National Boundaries Dataet,3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic

sth Data; US. Deparment

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CNW WASTEWATER

SYSTEM - EAST

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/28/2022

IJR

2248

CN W

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

N O

RT H

[Ú [Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

CNW Wastewater SystemNorton

Wastewater System

Legend Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Wise County Manhole

Wise County Gravity Main

[Ú Norton Pump Station

Norton Manhole

Norton Force Main

Norton Gravity Main

[Ú Wise Pump Station

Wise Force Main

Wise Gravity Main

Wise Manhole

Town Boundary

Wise County Wastewater System

Wise Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

Legend @ = Manhole =

Force Main

— Gravity Main

— Wise County Gravity Main | [Norton Pump Station @ Norton Manhole

‘+ Norton Force Main =

Norton Gravity Main [Hl Wise Pump Station == Wise Force Main —— Wise Gravity Main @ Wise Manhole

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Wise County Wastewater System

‘Norton A Wastewater System 5

PP 2 ‘Pitenson

‘ hy 56 The Nand Man tonal ainda ste 30 ean roam Gea i font halal ath nose eseeny Bane toad Sel og Can Nessa sli Boal oa ew einer Soe oes Wana | [SSF 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 us. fairest) oe suas uses LUCHED Nal tsa; Us berarment el] [peere-=—L Feet ‘State Humanitarian loformation Unit; arf NOAK National Centers for Environmental | — = Information, US, Coastal Relief Model ata reffihed ine, 2022, Tevneone ne cam

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/28/2022

IJR

2248

CN W

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

W ES

T /

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

CNW Wastewater System

Norton Wastewater System

Legend Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Wise County Manhole

Wise County Gravity Main

[Ú Norton Pump Station

Norton Manhole

Norton Force Main

Norton Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Wise County Wastewater System

WATIONAL, FoRAST

Legend ®@ Manhole == Force Main —= Gravity Main @ Wise County Manhole

—— Wise County Gravity Main

[Norton Pump Station @ Norton Manhole == Norton Force Main

—— Norton Gravity Main

JEFFERSON, NATIONAL FOREST

a sess

fear On, Nae

noosa

sural Earth Data; US,

on Dataset; we

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CNW WASTEWATER

SYSTEM - WEST

TOWN OF COEBURN COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF COEBURN, VIRIGNIA LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Coeburn is located in Wise County, Virginia along U.S. Route 58 and provides public sewer service to 996 +/- customers both within and outside of the Town’s corporate limits. The sewage collection system includes approximately 19 +/- miles of 4”-10” gravity/force main sewer lines and four (4) pump stations. The sewer is treated at the Coeburn-Norton-Wise Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

865 Residential Customers 131 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

996 Total Number of Customers

The collection system consists of 4” through 10” gravity/force main sewer lines. It is estimated that approximately 75% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 75% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2017 known as Sheffield Acres-Route 72 Sewer. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1950’s.

The system experiences capacity problems due to infiltration/inflow and inadequately sized lines.

The system includes four pump stations:

 Marty Pump Station – Pump capacity of 100 GPM. Upgraded in 2007

 Sheffield Acres 1 Pump Station – Pump capacity of 150 GPM. Constructed in 2017

 Sheffield Acres 2 Pump Station – Pump capacity of 115 GPM. Constructed in 2017

 Cordertown Pump Station – Pump capacity of 25 GPM. Upgraded in 2017

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Coeburn-Norton-Wise Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 30,892,000 3,163,158 10.2%

February 37,684,000 3,422,537 9.0%

March 41,020,000 2,378,130 5.7%

April 30,258,000 3,363,420 11.1%

May 28,080,000 3,718,690 13.2%

June 13,008,000 3,483,140 26.7%

July 6,820,000 3,078,910 45.1%

August 14,083,000 3,871,230 27.4%

September 13,124,000 3,107,547 23.6%

October 8,429,000 3,548,830 42.1%

November 6,559,000 2,690,111 41.1%

December 8,910,000 3,081,263 34.5%

Monthly Average 19,905,583 3,242,247 16.2%

Daily Average 663,519 108,074

TOWN OF COEBURN COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF COEBURN, VIRIGNIA LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Coeburn is located in Wise County, Virginia along U.S. Route 58 and provides public sewer service to 996 +/- customers both within and outside of the Town’s corporate limits. The sewage collection system includes approximately 19 +/- miles of 4”-10” gravity/force main sewer lines and four (4) pump stations. The sewer is treated at the Coeburn-Norton-Wise Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers

¥icic

The collection system consists of 4” through 10” gravity/force main sewer lines. Itis estimated that approximately 75% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 75% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2017 known as Sheffield Acres-Route 72 Sewer. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1950’s.

The system experiences capacity problems due to infiltration/inflow and inadequately sized lines. ‘The system includes four pump stations: © Marty Pump St

ion — Pump capacity of 100 GPM. Upgraded in 2007

Cordertown Pump Station — Pump capacity of 25 GPM. Upgraded in 2017 Treatment is ultimately provided at the Coebumn-Norton-Wise Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 30,892,000 3,163,158 10.2% February 37,684,000 3,422,537 9.0% March 41,020,000 2,378,130 5.7% April 30,258,000 3,363,420 11.1% May 28,080,000 3,718,690 13.2% June 13,008,000 3,483,140 26.7% July 6,820,000 3,078,910 45.1% August 14,083,000 3,871,230 27.4% September 13,124,000 3,107,547 23.6% October 8,429,000 3,548,830 42.1% November 6,559,000 2,690,111 411% December 8,910,000 3,081,263 34.5% Monthly Average 19,905,583 3,242,247 16.2%

Daily Average 663,519 108,074

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The collection system had 0? reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration/Inflow and Roots

System Needs – Improvement projects that have identified include:

As a result of the SSES/PER prepared in 2017, seven priorities were outlined. The Town has received funding application to VDEQ in the amount of $1,869,028 for the Phase I Coeburn Infiltration & Inflow Improvements Project. The Virginia Resources Authority later capped the amount to $1,500,000 due to financial concerns. The proposed project includes replacement of approximately 3,850 LF of 10-inch gravity sewer line, 2,000 LF of 8- inch gravity sewer line, 2,300 LF of 4-inch gravity sewer line and 30 manholes in the Banner section of Town. The Bondtown section of Town includes replacement of approximately 1,800 LF of 10-inch gravity sewer line, 350 LF of 4-inch gravity sewer line, and nine manholes.

Construction of Phase I Improvements are schedule to begin in the spring of 2023.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the entire area of the system by The Lane Group in 2017.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The Town does not have a AMP.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2021

 Residential (in-town) - $34.49/2,000 gallons
 Residential (out-of-town) – $58.23/2,000 gallons  Commercial (in-town) - $34.49/2,000 gallons  Commercial (out-of-town) - $58.23/2,200 gallons

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Sheffield Acres-Route 72 Sewer Project - $908,635.64 – Virginia Resources Authority – May 2035

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The collection system had 02_reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. © The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years. © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Infiltration/Inflow and Roots System Needs ~ Improvement projects that have identified include:

‘As a result of the SSES/PER prepared in 2017, seven priorities were outlined. The Town has received funding application to VDEQ in the amount of $1,869,028 for the Phase I Coeburn Infiltration & Inflow Improvements Project. The Virginia Resources Authority later capped the amount to $1,500,000 due to financial concerns. The proposed project includes replacement of approximately 3,850 LF of 10-inch gravity sewer line, 2,000 LF of 8- inch gravity sewer line, 2,300 LF of 4-inch gravity sewer line and 30 manholes in the Banner section of Town. The Bondtown section of Town includes replacement of approximately 1,800 LF of 10-inch gravity sewer line, 350 LF of 4-inch gravity sewer line, and nine manholes

Construction of Phase I Improvements are schedule to begin in the spring of 2023. Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES ‘A SSES was performed on the entire area of the system by The Lane Group in 2017.

Capital Improvements Plan ‘The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

‘The Town does not have a AMP.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2021

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans Sheffield Acres-Route 72 Sewer Project - $908,635.64 — Virginia Resources Authority ~ May 2035

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/15/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F CO

EB U

R N

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM /

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Forcemain

Gravity Main

Wise County Force Main

Wise County Gravity Main

Wise County Manhole

CNW Gravity Main

CNW Manhole

Town Boundary

Town of Coeburn Wastewater System

CNW Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

Marty Pump Station

Sheffield #2 Pump Station

Sheffield #1 Pump Station

Cordertown Pump Station

CNW Wastewater System

. ‘Sheffield #2

Zs Pump Station A T

TTown of Coeburn Wastewater System

Sheffield #1

Pump Station [—\

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Cordertown Pump Station

CNW Wastewater System

Legend 1 Pump Station @ = Manhole

SYSTEM

TOWN OF COEBURN WASTEWATER

©=- Forcemain

— Gravity Main

= =+ Wise County Force Main Wise County

Wastewater System ‘

= j iy

—— Wise County Gravity Main @ Wise County Manhole Marty —— CNW Gravity Main Pump Station

@ CNW Manhole Town Boundary

cnw a

Wastewater System — UScs The National ap: National Boundaries Dstaset,30EP Elevation Program, Geographic

Names Information System, National Hyography Dalse, atonal Land Cover Database,

‘atonal sructars Dataset, nd Nara Wansprtatin Dae; USGS Global Ecosstens;| [TTT PST US. Census Bureau TIGER/Lne dat; USFS Road Dat; Natural Earth Data US, Department of

Bs State Humanitarian Information Uni, and NORA National Centers for Environmental

Information, U.S. Coatal Rel Moe. Detacfreshed une, 2022, Tne

DUNGANNON COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF DUNGANNON LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Dungannon collection system serves the Town of Dungannon located in northeastern Scott County at the US Rte. 58 Alt. and US Rte. 72 intersection. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 1987. The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

228 Residential Customers 3 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

231 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 99% residential and 1% non- residential. The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1987. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1987.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

 Cassell Chapel Pump Station – 75 GPM submersible grinder pump station located approximately 600 ft west of the SR 65/72 and Scott County Horse Park entrance road intersection. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along SR65/72 approximately 0.83 miles northeast of the pump station.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Dungannon WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Dungannon WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0070670).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station.
A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 983,221 N/A

February N/A 632,197 N/A

March N/A 540,741 N/A

April N/A 412,740 N/A

May N/A 482,246 N/A

June N/A 612,792 N/A

July N/A 624,537 N/A

August N/A 540,063 N/A

September N/A 665,128 N/A

October N/A 634,672 N/A

November N/A 507,487 N/A

December N/A 529,899 N/A

Monthly Average 0 597,144 N/A

Daily Average 0 19,905 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 87

DUNGANNON COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF DUNGANNON LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Dungannon collection system serves the Town of Dungannon located in northeastem Scott County at the US Rte. 58 Alt. and US Rte. 72 intersection. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 1987,

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

228 Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

a Q — Other Municipal Systems 231 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 99% residential and 1% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1987. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1987,

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines The system includes one pump station:

© Cassell Chapel Pump Station — 75 GPM submersible grinder pump station located approximately 600 ft west of the SR 65/72 and Scott County Horse Park entrance road intersection. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along SR65/72 approximately 0.83 miles northeast of the pump station

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Dungannon WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Dungannon WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0070670).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 NA 983,221 NA February N/A 632,197 N/A Mareh N/A $40,741 N/A April N/A 412,740 N/A May N/A 482,246 N/A June N/A 612,792 N/A July NA 624,537 NA August NA 540,063 NA September NA 665,128 NA October N/A 634,672 N/A November N/A 507.487 N/A December N/A 529,899 N/A Monthly Average 0 597,144 N/A Daily Average 0 19,905 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 87

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Dungannon collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

 The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Hydraulic overloading during high rainfall events

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A partial SSES was performed on the manholes of the system in 2021 by the Lane Group. The SSES identified $ 75,000 of recommended system rehabilitation project(s) (SSES reports that existing manholes are in good condition, minimal I/I, recommends smoke testing for locating sources of I/I).

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on January 1, 2021:

Residential – In Town

First 2000 gallons $ 30.00

All over 2000 gallons $ 6.00

Residential –Out of Town

First 2000 gallons $ 34.00

All over 2000 gallons $ 6.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Town of Dungannon has an $8,558 annual debt service.

The system currently has approximately $N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Dungannon collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. NA were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

The system has had permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Hydraulic overloading during high rainfall events

System Needs Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A partial SSES was performed on the manholes of the system in 2021 by the Lane Group. The SSES identified $15,000 of recommended system rehabilitation project(s) (SSES reports that existing manholes are in good condition, minimal I/1, recommends smoke testing for locating sources of IP

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on January 1, 2021: Residential — In Town

st 2000 gallons $ 30.00 All over 2000 gallons $ 6.00

Residential -Out of Town

st 2000 gallons $34.00

All over 2000 gallons $ 6.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is STBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Lo: ‘The Town of Dungannon has an $8,558 annual debt service. The system currently has approximately SN/A in outstanding loan amount.

DUNGANNON WWTP – VPDES PERMIT # VA0070670 TOWN OF DUNGANNON LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at the end of SR T1018 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1987. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in N/A and involved N/A. The facility utilizes a 0.04 MGD aerobic package treatment plant as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Dungannon collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.0399 MGD.

The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.0199 MGD.

The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.0239 MGD.

The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 5 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Clinch River.

Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by M&M Pumping Services.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Town of Dungannon. Currently, 0 full time and 2 part time licensed operators work at the facility. __Class 1, X Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Hydraulic overloading during high rainfall events

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Inflow and infiltration identification and remediation  Increased system capacity

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown if possible)

DUNGANNON WWTP - VPDES PERMIT # VA0070670 TOWN OF DUNGANNON LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at the end of SR T1018 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1987, ‘The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in N/A and involved N/A. The facility utilizes a 0.04 MGD aerobic package treatment plant as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Dungannon collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.0399 MGD.

The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.0199 MGD.

The average daily flow treated at the facility for the calendar year 2021 was 0.0239 MGD.

hest three consecutive month period during

The facility exceeded 80% capacity for S days during this period, Effluent from the plant is discharged to ich River.

Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by M&M Pumping Services. Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by Town of Dungannon. Currently, 0 full time and 2 part time licensed operators work at the facility. __ Class 1, X Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had @ permit violations over the past 2 years. ‘The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

‘* Hydraulic overloading during high rainfall events

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Inflow and infiltration identification and remediation
Increased system capacity

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is STBD. (Include table breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F D

U N

G AN

N O

N W

AS TE

W AT

EE R

SY ST

EM /

[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

Town Boundary

Dungannon Wastewater System

Legend [Pump Station @ = Manhole

— Gravity Main

=> Force Main

Town Boundary

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet

Dungannon Wastewater System

86S The National Map: NasonalSoundares Dataset, SDEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydropraphy Dataset, National Lang Cover Ostabae, Navona tuctresOstaet and Navona tion Dataset; USGS Global Ecosyters US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line dat; USFS Rosa Data; Natura Earth Oat; US, Department

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF DUNGANNON WASTEWATEER SYSTEM

Bi ri

GATE CITY SANITATION AUTHORITY COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF GATE CITY, VIRIGNIA LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Gate City is in Scott County, Virginia and provides public sewer service to 939 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits as well as some adjacent areas of Scott County. The sewage collection system includes approximately 20 +/- miles of 4”-18” gravity/force main sewer lines, 565 manholes, and five (5) pump stations. The sewer is treated by the Scott County Public Service Authority’s Holston Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

803 Residential Customers 136 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

939 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 83% residential and 17% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 18” gravity/force main sewer lines. It is estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 15% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1960’s.

The system experiences no problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes five pump stations:

 619 Pump Station – Pump capacity of 100 GPM. Constructed in 1991 and upgraded in 2017

 Shoemaker Pump Station – Pump capacity of 100 GPM. Constructed in 1991 and upgraded in 2018

 Grogan Pump Station #1 – Pump capacity of 50 GPM. Constructed in 2000

 Grogan Pump Station #2 – Pump capacity of 50 GPM. Constructed in 2000

 Grogan Pump Station #3 – Pump capacity of 50 GPM. Constructed in 2009

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Scott County Public Service Authority’s Holston Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. (VPDES Permit #VA0067351.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 10,934,000 3,325,200 30.4%

February 13,017,900 3,159,900 24.2%

March 18,676,800 3,041,934 16.2%

April 10,177,500 3,499,400 34.3%

May 8,292,600 3,242,400 39%

June 8,736,800 3,226,900 36.9%

July 7,107,600 3,365,552 47.3%

August 9,318,800 3,794,300 40.7%

September 7,352,600 3,917,600 53.2%

October 7,508,400 3,896,367 51.8%

November 6,974,200 3,256,100 46.6%

GATE CITY SANITATION AUTHORITY COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF GATE CITY, VIRIGNIA. LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Gate City is in Scott County, Virginia and provides public sewer service to 939 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits as well as some adjacent areas of Scott County. The sewage collection system includes approximately 20 +/- miles of 4°-18” gravity/force main sewer lines, 565 manholes, and five (5) pump stations. The sewer is treated by the Scott County Public Service Authority’s Holston Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant,

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

803 Residential Customers 136 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers

Bice

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 83% residential and 17% non- residential.

‘The collection system consists of 4” through 18” gravity/force main sewer lines. Itis estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 15% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1960’s.

‘The system experiences no problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes five pump stations: © 619 Pump Station — Pump capacity of 100 GPM. Constructed in 1991 and upgraded in 2017

Shoemaker Pump Station — Pump capacity of 100 GPM. Constructed in 1991 and upgraded in 2018 © Grogan Pump Station #1 — Pump capacity of 50 GPM. Constructed in 2000

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Scott County Public Service Authority’s Holston Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. (VPDES Permit #VA0067351.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountal January 2021 10,934,000 3,325,200 30.4% February 13,017,900 3,159,900 24.2% March 18,676,800 3,041,934 16.2% April 10,177,500 3,499,400 34.3% May 8,292,600 3,242,400 39% June 8,736,800 3,226,900 36.9% July 7,107,600 3,365,552 41.3% August 9,318,800 3,794,300 40.7% September 7,352,600 3,917,600 53.2% October 7,508,400 3,896,367 51.8%

November 6,974,200 3,256,100 46.6%

December 8,463,600 3,256,100 38.4%

Monthly Average 9,713,400 3,415,146 35.05%

Daily Average 323,780 113,838
Avg / Customer 344.8 121

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Line blockages due to root intrusions, deteriorating pipes, and foreign items in sewer.

System Needs – Improvement projects that have identified include:

 SSES #1 – High School Area Collector  SSES #2 – East Jackson Street Area Collector  SSES #3 – West Jackson Street Area Trunkline  SSES #4 – East Highland Street Area Collector

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the entire area of the system in 2016. This information was utilized to obtain DEQ funding to replace/rehabilitate approximately 6,200 LF of existing sewer line in 2020.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Mattern & Craig in October 2020.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2018

 Residential (in-town) - $28.85  Residential (out-of-town) – N/A  Commercial (in-town) - $29.50  Commercial (out-of-town) - $N/A

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $4,451,000.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

New Peoples Bank - SA Series Refunding 2015: Original Debt: $595,143.54 - Retirement Date: 11/12/2025 VDEQ – Wastewater Line Replacement: Original Debt: $765,396.22 - Retirement Date: 04/01/2041

December 8,463,600 3,256,100 38.4%

Monthly Average 9,713,400 3,415,146 35.05% Daily Average 323,780 113,838 Avg/ Customer 344.8, 121

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The collection system had O,reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years, © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Line blockages due to root intrusions, deteriorating pipes, and foreign items in sewer System Needs ~ Improvement projects that have identified include:

SSES #1 — High School Area Collector SSES #2 ~ East Jackson Street Area Collector SSES #3 — West Jackson Street Area Trunkline

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

ASSES was performed on the entire area of the system in 2016. This information was utilized to obtain DEQ funding to replace/rehabilitate approximately 6,200 LF of existing sewer line in 2020.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Mattern & Craig in October 2020.

Sewer Rati

rructure The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2018

Commercial (in-town) - $29.50
Commercial (out-of-town) - SN/A

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $4,451,000.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘New Peoples Bank - SA Series Refunding 2015: Original Debt: $595,143.54 - Retirement Date: 11/12/2025 VDEQ — Wastewater Line Replacement: Original Debt: $765,396.22 - Retirement Date: 04/01/2041

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/12/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F G

AT E

CI TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM /

[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Scott County Force Main

[Ú Scott County Pump Station

Town Boundary

Town of Gate City Wastewater System

Scott County Wastewater System

Legend @ = Manhole — Gravity Main =~ Scott County Force Main Scott County Pump Station ‘Town Boundary

“Town of Gate City Wastewater System

‘Scott County Wastewater System

Scott County ‘Wastewater System

Names Information Stem, Notional Hyerapraphy Qstaset, Nationa! Land Cover Da National sutures Dataset

US. Census Bureau TIGER/ Gf state Humantarin Information Unit Information, US. Coastal Reif Model Data relreshed

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

GATE CITY WASTEWATER SYSTEM

TOWN OF

TOWN OF JONESVILLE COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF JONESVILLE, VIRIGNIA LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Jonesville is located in Lee County, Virginia and provides public sewer service to 510 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits. The sewage collection system includes approximately 5.7 +/- miles of gravity sewer lines. There are no pump stations and sewer is treatment at the Lee County PSA’s Hickory Flats Wastewater Treatment Plant. The collection system was constructed in the 1960’s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

490 Residential Customers 20 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

510 Total Number of Customers

NOTE: Due to a complete turn-over of both field and office staff, there are no billing information available.

The collection system consists of mostly 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 60% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 40% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1987. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1960’s.

The system includes no pump stations:

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Lee County PSA Hickory Flats WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0089397.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 1,475,000 TBD TBD

February 1,398,000 TBD TBD

March 1,632,000 TBD TBD

April 2,225,000 TBD TBD

May 1,148,000 TBD TBD

June 1,228,000 TBD TBD

July 1,339,000 TBD TBD

August 1,195,000 TBD TBD

September 1,137,000 TBD TBD

October 1,120,000 TBD TBD

November 1,127,000 TBD TBD

December 1,056,000 TBD TBD

Monthly Average 1,340,000 TBD TBD

Daily Average 44,666 TBD TBD

Avg / Customer 87.5 TBD

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.  The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

TOWN OF JONESVILLE COLLECTION SYSTEM. TOWN OF JONESVILLE, VIRIGNIA LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Town of Jonesville is located in Lee County, Virginia and provides public sewer service to 510 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits. The sewage collection system includes approximately 5.7 +/- miles of gravity sewer lines. There are no pump stations and sewer is treatment at the Lee County PSA’s Hickory Flats Wastewater Treatment Plant. The collection system was constructed in the 1960’s.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

490 Residential Customers 20 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

9 0 — Other Municipal Systems 510 Total Number of Customers

NOTE: Due to a complete turn-over of both field and office staff, there are no billing information available,

The system includes no pump stations: ‘Treatment is ultimately provided at the Lee County PSA Hickory Flats WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0089397.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month ‘Treated

January 2021 1,475,000 TBD February 1,398,000 TBD March 1,632,000 TBD April 2,225,000 TBD May 1,148,000 TBD June 1,228,000 TBD July 1,339,000 TBD August 1,195,000 TBD September 1,137,000 TBD October 1,120,000 TBD November 1,127,000 TBD December 1,056,000 TBD Monthly Average 1,340,000 TBD Daily Average 44,666 TBD Avg / Customer 87.5 TBD

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The collection system had 0,reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years. © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 No information provided.

System Needs

 Manhole Rehabilitation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The Town does not have AMP.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2021

 $13.91 for first 1,500 gallons of water  $9.04 for every1,000 after  Sewer is 87% of the total water bill  $10.50 sewer maintenance fee

No information provided. System Needs

Manhole Rehabilitation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES ASSES has not been performed.

Capital Improvements Plan The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan ‘The Town does not have AMP.

Sewer Rate Structure The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2021

$13.91 for first 1,500 gallons of water $9.04 for every1,000 after

Sewer is 87% of the total water bill $10.50 sewer maintenance fee

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/16/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F JO

N ES

VI LL

E W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

[Ú Pump Station

[Ú Lee County Pump Station

Lee County Force Main

Town Boundary

Town of Jonesville Wastewater System

Lee County Wastewater System

West End Pump Station

|Legend

@ = Manhole

—= Gravity Main [Pump Station Tl _Lee County Pump Station Lee County Force Main Town Boundary

Town of Jonesville Wastewater System

West End Pump Station |,

Lee County Wastewater System

0 250 500 000 1,500 2,000 a ee Feet

565 The Nationa Map RA WBA, SDEP evan Program BeogapisYomes lemme System, Raton! Hyogaphy Osa, Natloal and Cover Dabs, Nantel Sica Date, and Navona ‘anspotaton Dates USS Global oytoms US Conus Bureau NEEL dt, UPS Road Das Nara Ear bata, US. Deparment of State HurantaranTnermaton Un, an NOAA. Naoral Centers | Enarnentantarmaton Cosa Ree Model Ona eased ie, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF JONESVILLE WASTEWATER SYSTEM

BEN HUR COLLECTION SYSTEM
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Ben Hur wastewater collection system serves the Ben Hur Community, located along U.S. ALT 58 just outside the Town of Pennington Gap in Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The collection system is treated at the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharges into the Powell River.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

75 Residential Customers 12 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 87 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2005. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1988.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes 2 pump stations:

Central Lee Pump Station - Solids handling sewer pump station serving the Central Lee service area. It is capable of handling 85 gallons per minute (gpm) of raw, unscreened, domestic sanitary sewage and pump directly to the Ben Hur Pump Station. The Pump Station is located along US ALT 58, across from Fisher Rd. in Lee County, Virginia.

Ben Hur Pump Station – Solids handling sewer pump station serving the Central Lee service area. It is capable of handling 175 gallons per minute (gpm) of raw, unscreened, domestic sanitary sewage and pump directly to the Town of Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Pump Station is located along US ALT 58 within the Ben Hur community of Lee County, Virginia.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Pennington Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0029599).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Ben Hur Pump Station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the 2021-2022 fiscal year is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

July 2021 1,672,917 301,800 18%

August 1,672,917 337,900 20%

September 1,672,917 432,200 26%

October 1,672,917 447,500 27%

November 1,672,917 382,900 23%

December 1,672,917 783,500 47%

January 2022 1,672,917 1,559,700 93%

February 1,672,917 1,092,500 65%

March 1,672,917 1,101,300 66%

April 1,672,917 780,000 47%

BEN HUR COLLECTION SYSTEM. LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The Ben Hur wastewater collection system serves the Ben Hur Community, located along U.S. ALT 58 just outside the Town of Pennington Gap in Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The collection system is treated at the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharges into the Powell River.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers,

oiols

es g

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential

The collection system consists of 4” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed in 2005. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1988.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes 2 pump stations:

Central Lee Pump Station - Solids handling sewer pump station serving the Central Lee service area, It is capable of handling 85 gallons per minute (gpm) of raw, unscreened, domestic sanitary sewage and pump directly to the Ben Hur Pump Station, The Pump Station is located along US ALT 58, across from Fisher Rd. in Lee County, Virginia

Ben Hur Pump Station — Solids handling sewer pump station serving the Central Lee service area. It is capable of handling 175 gallons per minute (gpm) of raw, unscreened, domestic sanitary sewage and pump directly to the Town of Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant, The Pump Station is located along US ALT 58 within the Ben Hur community of Lee County, Virginia.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Pennington Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0029599). System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Ben

Hur Pump Station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the 2021-2022 fiscal year is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable July 2021 1,672,917 301,800 18% August 1,672,917 337,900 20% September 1,672,917 432,200 26% October 1,672,917 447,500 27% November 1,672,917 382,900 23% December 1,672,917 783,500 AM% January 2022 1,672,917 1,559,700, 3% February 1,672,917 1,092,500 65% March 1,672,917 1,101,300 66%

April 1,672,917 780,000 4TM%

May 1,672,917 800,000 48%

June 1,672,917 519,000 31%

Monthly Average 1,672,917 711,525 43%

Daily Average 55,000 23,393 43%

Avg / Customer 632 269

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Ben Hur community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the Ben Hur Community collection system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Residential Sewer Non-Residential Sewer Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60 3500 – 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 – 55,000 Gallons - $11.70 55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD.

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

May 1,672,917 800,000 48%

June 1,672,917 519,000 31% Monthly Average 1,672,917 711,525 B% Daily Average 55,000 23,393 B% Avg / Customer 632 269

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Ben Hur community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System © Infiltration & Inflow System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES A SSES has not been performed on the Ben Hur Community collection system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted,

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has not had an asset management plan prepared. Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Residential Sewer Non-Residential Sewer Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60

3500 ~ 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 — 55,000 Gallons - $11.70

55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is STBD.

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loa

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

B EN

H U

R /

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Lee County

Ben Hur Subsystem

Town of Pennington Gap Wastewater System

Stone Mountain Health Service - Private Pump Station

Central Lee Pump Station

Ben Hur Pump Station

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Private Pump Station

Force Main

Gravity Main

Pennington Gap Manhole

Pennington Gap Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Legend 1 Pump Station @ = Manhole A. Private Pump Station == Force Main — Gravity Main Z - @ Pennington Gap Manhole === Pennington Gap Gravity Main

77! Town Boundary

‘Lee County = Ben Hur Subsystem

Stone Mountain Health Service Private Pump Station

Central Lee Pump Station

1,000 2,000

4,000 6,000 8,000

Feet

Ben Hur Pump Station

“Town of Pennington Gap Wastewater System

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Oataset,3DEP ovation Program, Groarapie Names Information System, National Nysroraphy Dataset, National land Cover Oatabase, National Structures Oatset, and Navona Transportation Dataset; USGS. Glabal Ecosystems: US. Census Sureau TIGER/Line dats; USS Rood Data Natural Earth Osta; US. Depatment of State Humanitarian Information Uni; and NOAK Natonal Centers for Environmental Information, US. Coastal Rel Model Osta refteshed ue, 2022,

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

LEE COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - BEN HUR

Sai

CROSS CREEK SUBDIVISION COLLECTION SYSTEM
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Cross Creek Subdivision wastewater collection system serves the Cross Creek Community located along U.S. ALT 58 within the Town of Dryden of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Cross Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on the western side of the subdivision along the Powell River. The packaged treatment plant has a capacity of 0.03 million gallon per day (MGD).

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

88 Residential Customers 0 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 88 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% residential and 0% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1989. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1989.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes no pump stations.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Cross Creek Estates WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0075515).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Cross Creek Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 300,000 N/A N/A

February 300,000 N/A N/A

March 300,000 N/A N/A

April 300,000 N/A N/A

May 300,000 N/A N/A

June 300,000 N/A N/A

July 300,000 N/A N/A

August 300,000 N/A N/A

September 300,000 N/A N/A

October 300,000 N/A N/A

November 300,000 N/A N/A

December 300,000 N/A N/A

Monthly Average 300,000 N/A N/A

Daily Average 10,000 N/A N/A

Avg / Customer 113 N/A

CROSS CREEK SUBDIVISION COLLECTION SYSTEM LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning Distriet Commission

System Description — The Cross Creek Subdivision wastewater collection system serves the Cross Creek Community located along U.S. ALT 58 within the Town of Dryden of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Cross Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant is located on the westem side of the subdivision along the Powell River. The packaged treatment plant has a capacity of 0.03 million gallon per day (MGD).

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers

Biccic|z

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% r. residential.

jential and 0% non-

‘The collection system consists of 6” through &” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1989. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1989,

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes no pump stations. The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

‘Treatment is ultimately provided at the Cross Creek Estates WWTP (VPDES Permit #V 0075515).

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 300,000 NIA N/A February 300,000 NIA N/A March 300,000 NIA N/A April 300,000 NIA N/A May 300,000 NIA N/A June 300,000 NIA N/A July 300,000 NIA N/A August 300,000 NIA N/A September 300,000 NIA NIA October 300,000 NIA N/A November 300,000 NIA N/A December 300,000 NIA N/A Monthly Average 300,000 N/A NA Daily Average 10,000 N/A N/A

Avg/ Customer 113 N/A

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Cross Creek Subdivision collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the Cross Creek Subdivision collection system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD.

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Cross Creek Subdivision collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

ASSES has not been performed on the Cross Creek Subdivision collection system. Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared,

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Residential Sewer Non-Residential Sewer Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60

3500 — 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 — 55,000 Gallons - $11.70

55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD,

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding Joan of $7,000,000.

CROSS CREEK ESTATES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT – VPDES PERMIT #VA0075515 LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 158 Rose Bud Dr., Dryden, VA. (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1989. The plant has not received any major upgrades or expansions since it was originally constructed. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Cross Creek Subdivision collection system. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.03 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.01 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.01 MGD. The facility did not exceeded capacity during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Powell River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by hauling to the Hickory Flats WWTP.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Lee County Public Service Authority.
Currently, 5 full time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 2 and 4 Class 4. The facility is required to be staffed 4 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Plumbing is deteriorating and needs replacement  Difficulty of obtaining repair parts

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Replace the existing packaged wastewater treatment plant with a new and more reliable system

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $1,800,000. (Include table breakdown if possible)

CROSS CREEK ESTATES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT — VPDES PERMIT #VA0075515

LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY

Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 158 Rose Bud Dr., Dryden, VA. (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1989, ‘The plant has not received any major upgrades or expansions since it was originally constructed. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Cross Creek Subdivision collection system. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.03 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.01 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.01 MGD. The facility did not exceeded capacity during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Powell River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by hauling to the Hickory Flats WWTP.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Lee County Public Service Authority Currently, 5 full time licensed operators work at the facility. I Class 2 and 4 Class 4. The facility is required to be staffed 4 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues

experienced by the facility are as follows:

Plumbing is deteriorating and needs replacement
Difficulty of obtaining repair parts

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

Replace the existing packaged wastewater treatment plant with a new and more reliable system

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $1,800,000. (Include table breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

C R O

SS CR

EE EK

R D

TPWW[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Lee County

Cross Creek Subsystems

Dryden Wastewater System

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

TPWW WWTP

Private Pump Station

Force Main

Gravity Main

Dryden Manhole

Dryden Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Dryden

Wastewater System

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 a Feet

VIRGINIA

Legend

[Pump Station

@ = Manhole

fe] wwte

A. Private Pump Station == Force Main — Gravity Main

@ Dryden Manhole —— Dryden Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Lee County = Cross Creek Subsystems

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Oataset,3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hysrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National 'ureauTIGER/Line data; USS Rood Data Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of Sate Humanitarian Information Uni, and NOAA Natonal Centers for Environmental Information, US. Coastal Rel Model Osta refteshed ue, 2022,

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

LEE COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - CROSS CREEEK RD

DRYDEN COLLECTION SYSTEM
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Dryden wastewater collection system serves the Dryden Community, located along U.S. ALT 58 in the Eastern portion of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of terra cotta, asbestos, and primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The collection system is treated at the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharges into the Powell River.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

211 Residential Customers 14 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

225 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 94% residential and 6% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1991. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1991.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes two (2) pump stations:

 Dryden #1 Pump Station – A duplex sewer pump station serving the Dryden Community service area. The Pump Station is located along State Route 629 and discharges through a 6-inch forcemain to the Dryden #2 Pump Station.

 Dryden #2 Pump Station – A duplex sewer pump station serving the Dryden Community service area. The Pump Station is located along US ALT 58 and discharges through a 6-inch forcemain to the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Pennington Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0029599).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Dryden #2 Pump Station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 1,649,374 1,452,028 88%

February 1,649,374 712,865 43%

March 1,649,374 871,257 53%

April 1,649,374 693,692 42%

May 1,649,374 766,304 46%

June 1,649,374 826,936 50%

July 1,649,374 825,997 50%

August 1,649,374 599,347 36%

September 1,649,374 704,205 43%

October 1,649,374 703,323 43%

November 1,649,374 691,368 42%

DRYDEN COLLECTION SYSTEM LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The Dryden wastewater collection system serves the Dryden Community, located along US. ALT’58 in the Eastern portion of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of terra cotta, asbestos, and primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The collection system is treated at the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharges into the Powell River.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

211 Residential Customers 14 Commercial Customers

0 Industrial Customers

0 Other Municipal Systems 225 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 94% residential and 6% non- residential

The collection system consists of 4” through 8” gravity lines. Itis estimated that approximately 50% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed in 1991. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1991

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes two (2) pump stations

Dryden #1 Pump Station ~ A duplex sewer pump station serving the Dryden Community service area. The Pump Station is located along State Route 629 and discharges through a 6-inch forcemain to the

Dryden #2 Pump Station,

Dryden #2 Pump Station ~ A duplex sewer pump station serving the Dryden Community service area. The Pump Station is located along US ALT $8 and discharges through a 6-inch forcemain to the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Dryden #2 Pump Station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,649,374 1,452,028 88% February 1,649,374 712,865 43% March 1,649,374 871,257 53% April 1,649,374 693,692 42% May 1,649,374 766,304 46% June 1,649,374 826,936 50% July 1,649,374 825,997 50% August 1,649,374 599,347 36% September 1,649,374 704,205, 43% October 1,649,374 703,323 43%

November 1,649,374 691,368 2%

December 1,649,374 690,148 42%

Monthly Average 1,649,374 794,789 48%

Daily Average 54,225 26,130 48%

Avg / Customer 241 116

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Dryden community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the Dryden sewer system in May 2021 by The Lane Group, Inc. The SSES identified $600,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $600,000. (Include table breakdown is possible).

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

December 1,649,374 690,148 42%

Monthly Average 1,649,374 794,789 48% Daily Average 54,225 26,130 48% Avg / Customer 241 116

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Dryden community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years, © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the Dryden sewer system in May 2021 by The Lane Group, Inc. The SSES identified $600,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan The system currently does not have a CIP adopted,

Asset Management Plan The system has not had an asset management plan prepared, Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Residential Sewer Non-Residential Sewer Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60

3500 ~ 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 — 55,000 Gallons - $11.70

55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $600,000. (Include table breakdown is possible).

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding Joan of $7,000,000.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/28/2022

IJR

2248

D R YD

EN W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000750

Feet

Legend Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

[Ú Pump Station

Pennington Gap Manhole

Pennington Gap Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Dryden Wastewater System

Pennington Gap Wastewater System

Legend

@ = Manhole

=> Force Main

— Gravity Main [Pump Station @ Pennington Gap Manhole —— Pennington Gap Gravity Main A “! Town Boundary

Dryden Wastewater System

Pennington Gap ’ Wastewater System

0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 SS Feet

USGS The National Map: Navona! Boundaries Dataset, 3EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information stem, ational Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Nationa structures Dataset, and National Transporation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosjtems: US. Cons Breau TIGER/Line data; USES Road Dat Natural Earth Data; US Oepartment of State Humanitarian Information Unt and NOAA National Centers for Environmental information, US.

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

IASTEWATER, SYSTEM

EWING COLLECTION SYSTEM *NEED MORE INFO
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Ewing wastewater collection system serves the Ewing Community located along U.S. ALT 58 in the Western portion of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Ewing Wastewater Treatment Plant is located _______, and discharges into _______.
The packaged treatment plant has a capacity of ____ million gallon per day (MGD).

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

12 Residential Customers 0 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 12 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% residential and 0% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in ____. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in _____.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes no pump stations.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Ewing WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA______).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Ewing Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 29,700 N/A

February N/A 24,100 N/A

March N/A 28,200 N/A

April N/A 26,000 N/A

May N/A 52,400 N/A

June N/A 29,100 N/A

July N/A 39,400 N/A

August N/A 31,800 N/A

September N/A 36,100 N/A

October N/A 30,700 N/A

November N/A 29,200 N/A

December N/A 30,100 N/A

Monthly Average N/A 32,233 N/A

Daily Average N/A 1,060 N/A

Avg / Customer N/A 106

EWING COLLECTION SYSTEM *NEED MORE INFO LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The Ewing wastewater collection system serves the Ewing Community located along U.S. ALT 58 in the Western portion of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Ewing Wastewater Treatment Plant is located and discharges into

The packaged treatment plant has a capacity of ___ million gallon per day (MGD).

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

12 Residential Customers

0 Commercial Customers

0 Industrial Customers

0 Other Municipal Systems

12 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% residential and 0% non- residential

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed it The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes no pump stations.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Ewing WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA. » System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Ewing

Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

ons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 N/A 29,700 N/A February N/A 24,100 N/A March N/A 28,200 N/A April N/A 26,000 N/A May N/A 52,400 N/A June N/A 29,100 N/A July N/A 39,400 N/A August N/A 31,800 N/A September N/A 36,100 N/A October N/A 30,700 N/A November N/A 29,200 N/A December N/A 30,100 N/A Monthly Average N/A (32,233 N/A Daily Average N/A 1,060 N/A

Avg / Customer NA 106

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Ewing community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the Ewing Community collection system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $_________________. (Include table breakdown is possible).

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Ewing community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year

The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

‘ASSES has not been performed on the Ewing Community collection system. Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Residential Sewer Non-Residential Sewer Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60

3500 — 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 — 55,000 Gallons - $11.70

55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $ . (Include table breakdown is possible).

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding Joan of $7,000,000.

EWING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT – VPDES PERMIT #VA_______ *NEED MORE INFO
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at __________________ (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in _____. The plant has not received any major upgrades or expansions since it was originally constructed. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Ewing Community collection system. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is ____ MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.0010 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.0014 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for ___ days during this period.
Effluent from the plant is discharged to ____. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by hauling to the Hickory Flats WWTP.

Permit Violations – The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Plumbing is deteriorating and needs replacement  Difficulty of obtaining repair parts

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Replace the existing packaged wastewater treatment plant with a new and more reliable system

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $_______. (Include tale breakdown if possible)

EWING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT — VPDES PERMIT

#VA, *NEED MORE INFO LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in The plant has not received any major

upgrades or expansions since it was ori method of sewage treatment.

inally constructed. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Ewing Community collection system, The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.0010 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.0014 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to_. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by hauling to the Hickory Flats WWTP.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues

experienced by the facility are as follows:

Plumbing is deteriorating and needs replacement
Difficulty of obtaining repair parts

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

Replace the existing packaged wastewater treatment plant with a new and more reliable system

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $ . (Include tale breakdown if possible)

HICKORY FLATS WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Hickory Flats wastewater collection system is located along U.S. Route 58 in Lee County, Virginia and serves the Hickory Flats Community, USP-Lee Federal Prison, and Town of Jonesville. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Hickory Flats Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility has a permitted capacity of 0.80 million gallon per day (MGD).

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

21 Residential Customers 1 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 1 Other Municipal Systems 23 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 91% residential and 9% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1989. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1989.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes six (6) pump stations:

 Super Sac Pump Station – A sewer lift station and forcemain that serves the existing Hickory Flats Industrial Park in Lee County, VA. It is designed to handle flows up to 52 gallons per minute (gpm). The pump station discharges through a 3-inch forcemain into the Litton Pump Station.

 Allen Minor Pump Station – A duplex sewer pump system that serves a small community in the western portion of the Town of Jonesville. The station is designed to handle flows up to 250 gpm. The pump station discharges into the Old Jonesville Pump Station through a 6-inch forcemain.

 West Jonesville Pump Station – Serves the west half of the Town of Jonesville. The station is designed to handle flows up to 130 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the Old Jonesville Pump Station through a 4-inch forcemain.

 Old Jonesville Pump Station – Located at the Old Jonesville WWTP, the pump station collects flows form the existing Jonesville collection system and the flows from the West Jonesville Pump Station. The station is designed to handle flows up to 365 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the Town Branch Pump Station through a 6-inch force main.

 Town Branch Pump Station – The grinder pump station is located in East Jonesville and is capable of handling flows up to 400 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station from an 8” force main. The pump station discharges through an 8-inch forcemain into the 1230 pump station.

 1230 Pump Station – The pump station receives wastewater from the Town Branch Pump Station and is pumped to the Hickory Flats WWTP. The station is designed to handle flows up to 400 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station from the Town Branch Pump Station via an 8-inch forcemain.

 Litton Pump Station – The pump station receives wastewater from the Lee County Federal Prison and the Lee County Industrial Park and pumps it to the Hickory Flats WWTP through a 12-inch forcemain. The station is designed to handle flows up to 1,000 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via a 12-inch gravity sewer.

HICKORY FLATS WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The Hickory Flats wastewater collection system is located along U.S. Route 58 in Lee County, Virginia and serves the Hickory Flats Community, USP-Lee Federal Prison, and Town of Jonesville. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Hickory Flats Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility has a permitted capacity of 0.80 million gallon per day (MGD).

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

21 Residential Customers Commercial Customers, Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers,

Brick

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 91% residential and 9% non- residential

The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed in 1989. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1989,

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes six (6) pump stations:

Super Sac Pump Station ~ A sewer lift station and forcemain that serves the existing Hickory Flats Industrial Park in Lee County, VA. It is designed to handle flows up to 52 gallons per minute (gpm). The pump station discharges through a 3-inch forcemain into the Litton Pump Station.

Allen Minor Pump Station ~ A duplex sewer pump system that serves a small community in the western portion of the Town of Jonesville. The station is designed to handle flows up to 250 gpm. The pump station discharges into the Old Jonesville Pump Station through a 6-inch forcemain,

West Jonesville Pump Station ~ Serves the west half of the Town of Jonesville, The station is designed to handle flows up to 130 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the Old Jonesville Pump Station through a 4-inch forcemain,
Old Jonesville Pump Station ~ Located at the Old Jonesville WWTP, the pump station collects flows form the existing Jonesville collection system and the flows from the West Jonesville Pump Station. The station is designed to handle flows up to 365 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the Town Branch Pump Station through a 6-inch force main.
Town Branch Pump Station ~ The grinder pump station is located in East Jonesville and is capable of handling flows up to 400 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station from an 8” force main, The pump station discharges through an 8-inch forcemain into the 1230 pump station.

1230 Pump Station ~ The pump station receives wastewater from the Town Branch Pump Station and is pumped to the Hickory Flats WWTP. The station is designed to handle flows up to 400 gpm. Sewage centers the pump station from the Town Branch Pump Station via an 8-inch forcemain.

Litton Pump Station — The pump station receives wastewater from the Lee County Federal Prison and the Lee County Industrial Park and pumps it to the Hickory Flats WWTP through a 12-inch forcemain, The station is designed to handle flows up to 1,000 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via a 12-inch gravity sewer.

The system also collects flow from the Town of Jonesville system.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Hickory Flats WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0089397).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Hickory Flats Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 7,308,500 7,308,500 100%

February 7,655,600 7,655,600 100%

March 6,316,300 6,316,300 100%

April 7,291,800 7,291,800 100%

May 7,028,200 7,028,200 100%

June 8,066,200 8,066,200 100%

July 7,258,500 7,258,500 100%

August 7,725,300 7,725,300 100%

September 7,030,000 7,030,000 100%

October 7,121,000 7,121,000 100%

November 7,083,200 7,083,200 100%

December 7,325,500 7,325,500 100%

Monthly Average 7,267,508 7,267,508 100%

Daily Average 238,932 238,932 100%

Avg / Customer 10,388 10,388

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Hickory Flats wastewater collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the Hickory Flats wastewater collection system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

The system also collects flow from the Town of Jonesville system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Hickory Flats WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0089397). System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the

Hickory Flats Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 7,308,500 7,308,500 100% February 7,655,600 7,655,600 100% March 6,316,300 6,316,300 100% April 7,291,800 7,291,800 100% May 7,028,200 7,028,200 100% June 8,066,200 8,066,200 100% July 7,258,500 7,258,500 100% August 7,725,300 7,725,300 100% September 7,030,000 7,030,000 100% October 7,121,000 7,121,000 100% November 7,083,200 7,083,200 100% December 7,325,500 7,325,500 100% Monthly Average 7,267,508 7,267,508 100% Daily Average 238,932 238,932 100% Avg / Customer 10,388 10,388

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Hickory Flats wastewater collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021

The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System © Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The or as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

ance does address private side issues such

ASSES has not been performed on the Hickory Flats wastewater collection system. ;pital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently does not have a CIP adopted,

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD.

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

Asset Management Plan The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Non-Residential Sewer

Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60

3500 ~ 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 — 55,000 Gallons - $11.70

55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is STBD.

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding Joan of $7,000,000.

HICKORY FLATS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT – VPDES PERMIT #VA0089397 LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 309 Treatment Plant Rd., Pennington Gap, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1999. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2015 and involved additions and upgrades to the headworks building, mechanical building, laboratory building, digesters, blowers, UV disinfection system and miscellaneous plumbing and electrical. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from Town of Jonesville collection system and USP-Lee Federal Prison. The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.80 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.24 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.26 MGD. The facility did not exceeded capacity during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Powell River. Sludge from the facility is pressed and hauled to the landfill.

Permit Violations – The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Blower motor belts breaking often  Unreliability of monitoring equipment

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Plant control upgrades

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $TBD.

HICKORY FLATS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT — VPDES.

PERMIT #VA0089397 LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description ~ The treatment facility is located at 309 Treatment Plant Rd., Pennington Gap, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1999. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2015 and involved additions and upgrades to the headworks building, mechanical building, laboratory building, digesters, blowers, UV disinfection system and miscellaneous plumbing and electrical. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment,

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from Town of Jonesville collection system. and USP-Lee Federal Prison, The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.80 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.24 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.26 MGD. The facility did not exceeded capacity during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Powell River. Sludge from the facility is pressed and hauled to the landfill

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Lee County Public Service Authority. Currently, 5 full time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 2 and 4 Class 4. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Blower motor belts breaking often © Unreliability of monitoring equipment

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Plant control upgrades

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the

identified facility improvements is STBD.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

H IC

KO R Y

FL AT

S EA

ST /

TPWW

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Lee County

Hickory Flats Subsystem

Super Sac Pump Station

Litton Pump Station

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

TPWW WWTP

Force Main

Gravity Main

Legend

1H] Pump Station @ Manhole [=] wwte

<== Force Main

— Gravity Main

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

rac) “son ESS sree Super Sac zkeOoe@ subse Pup Station 3 E Zo SORSE uns Ss wser 5 ia) Litton ump Station ( $i USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names 01.000 2,000 4.000 8,000 5,000 x Bureau Gentine at USS Rood Daan Eath Dat Deparment of ae Huan re Feet tnrmaton Units an NOAA Natonal Centar frEnvronmertlermavon, U3, Cust Relat] (== Nol Det esha ne, 222 : Tn

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

H IC

KO R Y

FL AT

S W

ES T

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Lee County

Hickory Flats Subsystem

Jonesville Wastewater System

Old Jonesville Pump Station

Allen Minor Pump Station

Town Branch Pump Station

1230 Pump Station

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Jonesville Manhole

Jonesville Gravity Main

Town Boundary

A fn

Legend TE Pump Station @ = Manhole

== Force Main — Gravity Main

@ Jonesville Manhole —— Jonesville Gravity Main

fown Boundary

Jonesvile oi Old Jonesville

Wastewater System Pump Station

Lee County = Hickory Flats Subsystem

“Town Branch Pump Station

‘Allen Minor Pump Station

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 a Feet

1230 Pump Station

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Ostet, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Nemes InkSAREEhNEe, National Hyérogrophy Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Oatsat, and National Transportation Dataset: USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USS Road Data; Natural Earth Daa U.S. Department of Sate Humanitarian Information Unit, and NOAA Natonal Centers for Envonmental Information, US. Coastal Rei Model Osta reftshed une, 2022,

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

LEE COUNTY WASTEWATER, SYSTEM - HICKORY FLATS WEST

Sai

ROSE HILL COLLECTION SYSTEM
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The Rose Hill wastewater collection system serves the Rose Hill Community located along U.S. ALT 58 in the Western portion of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant is located along State Route 672, south of the community, and discharges into Martin’s Creek. The packaged treatment plant has a capacity of 0.06 million gallon per day (MGD).

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

129 Residential Customers 14 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

143 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1995. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1995.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes no pump stations.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Rose Hill WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0088111).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 2,025,000 401,900 20%

February 2,199,000 311,900 14%

March 1,665,000 336,800 20%

April 2,817,000 384,700 14%

May 1,698,000 377,200 22%

June 1,632,000 415,600 25%

July 1,698,000 404,500 24%

August 1,557,000 382,400 25%

September 1,683,000 443,000 26%

October 1,518,000 471,300 31%

November 1,527,000 385,700 25%

December 1,437,000 392,500 27%

Monthly Average 1,788,000 392,292 22%

Daily Average 58,783 12,897 22%

Avg / Customer 411 90

ROSE HILL COLLECTION SYSTEM LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The Rose Hill wastewater collection system serves the Rose Hill Community located along U.S. ALT 58 in the Western portion of Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised of primarily polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The Rose Hill Wastewater Treatment Plant is located along State Route 672, south of the community, and discharges into Martin’s Creek. The packaged treatment plant has a capacity of 0.06 million gallon per day (MGD).

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

129 Residential Customers 14 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 143 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential.

‘The collection system consists of 4” through &” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1995. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1995,

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes no pump stations. The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

‘Treatment is ultimately provided at the Rose Hill WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0088111).

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 2,025,000 401,900 20% February 2,199,000 311,900 14% March, 1,665,000 336,800 20% April 2,817,000 384,700 14% May 1,698,000 377,200 22% June 1,632,000 415,600 25% July 1,698,000 404,500 24% August 1,557,000 382,400 25% September 1,683,000 443,000 26% October 1,518,000 471,300 31% November 1,527,000 385,700 25% December 1,437,000 392,500 27% Monthly Average 1,788,000 392,292 22% Daily Average 58,783 12,897 22%

Avg/ Customer Ail 90

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Rose Hill community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SES

A SSES was performed on the Rose Hill sewer system in July 2021 by The Lane Group, Inc. The SSES identified $170,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $170,000. (Include table breakdown is possible).

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Rose Hill community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System Infiltration & Inflow System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an exii

ing sewer use ordinance, The ordinance does address private side issues such

as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines. SES

ASSES was performed on the Rose Hill sewer system in July 2021 by The Lane Group, Inc. The SSES identified $170,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has not had an asset management plan prepared. Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Residential Sewer ‘Non-Residential Sewer Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60

3500 — 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 — 55,000 Gallons - $11.70

55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $170,000. (Include table breakdown is possible).

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding Joan of $7,000,000.

ROSE HILL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT – VPDES PERMIT #VA0088111 LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 826 Martins Creek Rd., Rose Hill, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1995. The plant has not received any major upgrades or expansions since it was originally constructed. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Rose Hill Community collection system. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.06 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.06 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.06 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 128 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Martin’s Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by hauling to the Hickory Flats WWTP.

Permit Violations – The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Plumbing is deteriorating and needs replacement  Difficulty of obtaining repair parts

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Replace the existing packaged wastewater treatment plant with a new and more reliable system

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $TBD.

ROSE HILL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT — VPDES PERMIT #VA0088111

LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY

Lenowisco Planning District Commission

Facility Description ~The treatment facility is located at 826 Martins Creek Rd., Rose Hill, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1995. ‘The plant has not received any major upgrades or expansions since it was originally constructed. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Rose Hill Community collection system. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.06 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.06 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0,06 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 128 days during this period, Effluent from the plant is discharged to Martin’s Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of by hauling to the Hickory Flats WWTP.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has received no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Plumbing is deteriorating and needs replacement
Difficulty of obtaining repair parts

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

Replace the existing packaged wastewater treatment plant with a new and more reliable system

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is STBD.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/28/2022

IJR

2248

R O

SE H

IL L

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM /

TPWW

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Legend Gravity Main

TPWW WWTP

Manhole

Rosehill Wastewater System

Legend

— Gravity Main

& wre

@ Manhole

VIRGINIA

Rosehill Wastewater System

0 500 Se Feet

USGS the National Map: National SoundatesOatset,30EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names information Stem, National Hyrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Nationa Structures Ostset, and National Traeporaton Dataet, USGS Global costes, US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USES Road Ona; Natural Earth Data; US, Deparment ff State Humanitarian Information Units and NOAA National Centers for Environment

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

ROSEHILL WASTEWATER SYSTEM

DEQ

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

W ES

TE R N

LE E

CO U

N TY

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend Force Main

Gravity Main

Lee County

Western Lee Subsystem

Legend

== Force Main

— Gravity Main

1,000 2,000 4,000

Lee County = Western Lee Subsystem

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Nysrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Oatset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems U.S. Census ‘ueeauTIGER/Lin data; USS Road Data Natural Earth Data; US. Department of Sate Humanitarian Information Uni; and NOAA Natonal Centers for Environmental Information, US. Coastal Rel Model Osta refteshed ue, 2022,

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

LEE COUNTY WASTEWATER, SYSTEM - WESTERN LEE COUNTY

a Ly

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

W ES

TE R N

LE E

CO U

N TY

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend Force Main

Gravity Main

Lee County

Western Lee Subsystem

Legend

== Force Main

— Gravity Main

Lee County Western Lee Subsystem

1,000 2,000 4,000

6,000

8,000 Feet

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Ont, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hysrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National ‘Bureau NGER/Line data; USFS Road Data Natural arth Data; US. Departmen of Sate Humacitaian Information Uni, and NOAA Natonal Centers for Environmental Infornation, US. Coastal Rel Model Osta refteshed une, 2022,

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

LEE COUNTY WASTEWATER, SYSTEM - WESTERN LEE COUNTY

a Ly

ST. CHARLES COLLECTION SYSTEM
LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The St. Charles wastewater collection system serves the St. Charles Community, located along U.S. ALT 58, north of the Town of Pennington Gap in Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised primarily of terra cotta, cast iron and polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The collection system is treated at the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharges into the Powell River.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

187 Residential Customers 2 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

189 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 99% residential and 1% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 15” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 30% of the system consists of terra cotta or ductile iron lines and approximately 30% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2007. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in N/A.

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes three (3) pump stations:

 North St. Charles Pump Station – Serves the North St. Charles community. The pump station is designed to handle flows up to 45 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the St. Charles collection system through a 3-inch forcemain.

 Red Hill Poor Valley Pump Station – Serves the Red Hill and Poor Valley communities. The pump station is designed to handle flows up to 66 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the St. Charles collection system through a 3-inch forcemain.

 Pennington Gap Interceptor Pump Station – Solids handling sewer pump station serving the Town of St. Charles service area. It operates to convey sewage flows up to 0.41 million gallons per day (MGD). The pump station discharges to the Pennington Gap WWTP through a 6-inch forcemain. The station located at the intersection of US Route 421 and State Route 606 on Straight Creek, just above its confluence with the North Fork of the Powell River.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Pennington Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0029599).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the Pennington Gap Interceptor Pump Station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the 2021- 2022 fiscal year is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 1,977,083 437,850 22%

February 1,977,083 424,730 21%

March 1,977,083 360,612 18%

April 1,977,083 379,320 19%

May 1,977,083 387,211 20%

ST. CHARLES COLLECTION SYSTEM LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The St. Charles wastewater collection system serves the St. Charles Community, located along U.S. ALT 58, north of the Town of Pennington Gap in Lee County, VA. System-wide, piping is comprised primarily of terra cotta, cast iron and polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The collection system is treated at the Pennington Gap Wastewater Treatment Plant and discharges into the Powell River.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

187 Residential Customers Commercial Customers. Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems 189 Total Number of Customers

Biciom

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 99% residential and 1% non- residential

The system does not experience any problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes three (3) pump stations:

North St, Charles Pump Station ~ Serves the North St. Charles community. The pump station is designed to handle flows up to 45 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the St. Charles collection system through a 3-inch forcemain.
Red Hill Poor Valley Pump Station ~ Serves the Red Hill and Poor Valley communities. The pump station is designed to handle flows up to 66 gpm. Sewage enters the pump station via an 8-inch sanitary sewer inlet and passes immediately through an influent grinder once entering the wet well. The pump station discharges into the St. Charles collection system through a 3-inch forcemain.

Pennington Gap Interceptor Pump Station ~ Solids handling sewer pump station serving the Town of St. Charles service area. It operates to convey sewage flows up to 0.41 million gallons per day (MGD). The pump station discharges to the Pennington Gap WWTP through a 6-inch forcemain, The station located at the intersection of US Route 421 and State Route 606 on Straight Creek, just above its confluence with the North Fork of the Powell River.

The system does not collect flow from additional systems. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Pennington Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0029599).

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,977,083 437,850 22% February 1,977,083 424,730 21% March 1,977,083 360,612 18% April 1,977,083 379,320 19%

May 1,977,083 387,211 20%

June 1,977,083 485,007 25%

July 1,977,083 448,016 23%

August 1,977,083 527,415 27%

September 1,977,083 441,915 22%

October 1,977,083 408,718 21%

November 1,977,083 428,245 22%

December 1,977,083 435,891 22%

Monthly Average 1,977,083 430,411 22%

Daily Average 65,000 14,150 22%

Avg / Customer 344 75

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The St. Charles community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line and Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the St. Charles Community collection system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $ TBD.

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

June 1,977,083 485,007 25%

July 1,977,083 448,016 23% August 1,977,083 527,415 27% September 1,977,083 441,915 22% October 1,977,083 408,718 21% November 1,977,083 428,245 22% December 1,977,083 435,891 22% Monthly Average 1,977,083 430,411 22% Daily Average 65,000 14,150 22% Avg/ Customer 344 5

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The St. Charles community collection system had no reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

‘© The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES A SSES has not been performed on the St. Charles Community collection system. Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has not had an asset management plan prepared.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022

Residential Sewer Non-Residential Sewer Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $41.64 Base Rate (2000 Gallons) - $42.44 Per 1000 Gallons After - $11.27 2001-3499 Gallons - $18.60

3500 — 42,499 Gallons - $14.00 Flat Rate Sewer - $58.63 42,500 ~ 55,000 Gallons - $11.70

55,000+ Gallons - $10.50

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $ TBD.

Lee County PSA Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Lee County PSA system currently has an annual sewer dept of approximately $300,000 and an outstanding loan of $7,000,000.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

S AI

N T

CH AR

LE S

N O

RT H

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Lee County

Saint Charles Subsystem

North St. Charles Pump Station

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Legend 1 Pump Station @ = Manhole =e Force Main

— Gravity Main

Town Boundary

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 a Feet

VIRGINIA

Pump Station

__] North st. charies

Lee County = Saint Charles

Subsystem

USGS The National Map: Nationa Boundaries Ontset,JDEP Elevation Program, Gaograpic Names Information system, National. Nyérorophy, Dataset) National. Land Cover Database, National ‘ureau TIGER Lin data USS Road Data Natural Earth Data; U.S Department of Sate Humanitarian Information Un, and NOAK NaGonal Centers for Environmental Information, US. Coastal Rel Model Data refteshed ne 2022.

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

LEE COUNTY WASTEWATER

SYSTEM - SAINT CHARLES NORTH

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

S AI

N T

CH AR

LE S

N O

RT H

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Lee County

Saint Charles Subsystem

Pennington Gap Wastewater System

Town of Dryden Wastewater System

Lee County

Ben Hur Subsystem

Lee County

Hickory Flats Subsystem

Pennington Gap Interceptor Pump Station

Red Hill/Poor Valley Pump Station

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

[Ú Dryden Pump Station

Dryden Manhole

Dryden Gravity Main

Dryden Force Main

Pennington Gap Manhole

Pennington Gap Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Legend 1 Pump Station @ = Manhole =e Force Main —= Gravity Main (Hl Dryden Pump Station @ Dryden Manhole = Dryden Gravity Main

Dryden Force Main @ Pennington Gap Manhole —— Pennington Gap Gravity Main

‘Town Boundary

Lee County Ben Hur Subsystem

000 2,000 4

100 6,000 8,000

Pennington Gap

| imerceptor Pump Station

Lee County Saint Charles

Subsystem

‘Town of Dryden Wastewater System

Red Hill/Poor Valley Pump Station

Pennington Gap Wastewater System

Lee County = Hickory Flats Subsystem

alk

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset Information System, National Hysropraphy Dataset, Structures Dataset and Nationa Tansporaton Oat futeauTIGER/Line data USFS Road Data Natwal Ean Information Unt; and NOAA Natonal Centers for Model Osta refteshedune, 2022

EP elevation Program, Geographic Names USGS Global ceabstems: US. Census

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

LEE COUNTY WASTEWATER

SYSTEM - SAINT CHARLES NORTH

CITY OF NORTON COLLECTION SYSTEM
CITY OF NORTON Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description – The City of Norton is a residential and commercial center situated at the intersection of U.S. Route 23 and U.S. Route 58 Alternate in central Wise County, Virginia. The City’s sanitary sewer system piping is comprised of terra cotta, asbestos cement, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) material and were constructed in the 1950’s. Manholes date from the same time period and are constructed of brick and mortar. The system provides sanitary sewer collection for approximately 4,500 persons.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1850 Residential Customers 344 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 1 Other Municipal Systems

2,195 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 85% residential and 15% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 85% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 85% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2012. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1940’s.

No areas of the system have experienced problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

 Josephine Pump Station – Grinder sewer pump station serving the Josephine Community within the City of Norton service area. It is capable of handling 27.5 GPM of raw, domestic sanitary sewage to the City of Norton Collection System. The Pump Station is located along State Route 610 within the Josephine Community.

The system also collects flow from the Wise County Public Service Authority system.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to CNW Regional Wastewater Authority. Treatment is ultimately provided at the CNW Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon metering equipment located at the CNW Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 83,044,000 9,148,200 11%

February 114,267,000 9,148,200 8%

March 113,687,000 9,148,200 8%

April 66,216,000 9,148,200 14%

May 61,735,000 9,148,200 15%

June 52,744,000 9,148,200 17%

July 49,702,000 9,148,200 18%

August 70,149,000 9,148,200 13%

September 64,584,000 9,148,200 14%

October 56,745,000 9,148,200 16%

November 47,821,000 9,148,200 19%

December 54,882,000 9,148,200 17%

CITY OF NORTON COLLECTION SYSTEM CITY OF NORTON Lenowisco Planning District Commission

System Description — The City of Norton is a residential and commercial center situated at the intersection of U.S. Route 23 and U.S. Route 58 Alternate in central Wise County, Virginia, The City’s sanitary sewer system piping is comprised of terra cotta, asbestos cement, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) material and were constructed in the 1950°s. Manholes date from the same time period and are constructed of brick and mortar. The system provides sanitary sewer collection for approximately 4,500 persons.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1850 Residential Customers 344 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

0 1 Other Municipal Systems 2,195 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 85% residential and 15% non- residential.

‘The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 85% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 85% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2012. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1940°s,

No areas of the system have experienced problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes one pump station:

Josephine Pump Station — Grinder sewer pump station serving the Josephine Community within the City of Norton service area, It is capable of handling 27.5 GPM of raw, domestic sanitary sewage to the City of Norton Collection System. The Pump Station is located along State Route 610 within the Josephine ‘Community.

The system a

so collects flow from the Wise County Public Service Authority system.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to CNW Regional Wastewater Authority. Treatment is ultimately provided at the CNW Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 83,044,000 9,148,200 11% February 114,267,000 9,148,200 8% March 113,687,000 9,148,200 8% April 66,216,000 9,148,200 14% May 61,735,000 9,148,200 15% June 52,744,000 9,148,200 17% July 49,702,000 9,148,200 18% August 70,149,000 9,148,200 13% September 64,584,000 9,148,200 14% October 56,745,000 9,148,200 16% November 47,821,000 9,148,200 19%

December 54,882,000 9,148,200 17%

Monthly Average 69,631,333 9,148,200 13%

Daily Average 2,289,249 300,762 13%

Avg / Customer 1,043 137

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The City of Norton collection system had 1 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. None were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 1 was due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

 The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

 Line Rehabilitation
 Manhole Rehabilitation  I/I Remediation

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES is being performed on the City of Norton collection system by Mattern & Craig. The survey is currently incomplete.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2022. The CIP includes $17,000,000 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system currently does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Inside City Limits Outside City Limits Water - $19.10 (<2,000 gallons) Water - $28.65 (<2,000 gallons)
Each additional 1,000 gallons - $6.65 Each additional 1,000 gallons - $13.30 Sewer Rate – 175% of Water Bill Sewer Rate – 200% of Water Bill

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $17,000,000.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has an existing annual debt service of $126,623 and N/A in outstanding loan.

Monthly Average 69,631,333 9,148,200 13% Daily Average 2,289,249 300,762 13% Avg / Customer 1,043 137

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The City of Norton collection system had J reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. None were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, | was due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Infiltration & Inflow

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines. SSES

ASSES is being performed on the City of Norton collection system by Mattern & Craig. The survey is currently incomplete.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2022. The CIP includes $17,000,000 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

‘Asset Management Plan The system currently does not have an asset management plan, Sewer Rate

rructure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022

Inside City Limits Outside City Limits

Water - $19.10 (<2,000 gallons) Water - $28.65 (<2,000 gallons)

Each additional 1,000 gallons - $6.65 Each additional 1,000 gallons - $13.30 Sewer Rate ~ 175% of Water Bill Sewer Rate ~ 200% of Water Bill

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $17,000,000.

‘System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has an e

ng annual debt service of $126,623 and N/A in outstanding loan,

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/30/2022

IJR

2248

CI TY

O F

N O

RT O

N W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Wise County Manhole

Wise County Gravity Main

Wise County Force Main

[Ú Wise Pump Station

Wise Manhole

Wise Gravity Main

Wise Force Main

CNW Force Main

CNW Gravity Main

CNW Manhole

City Boundary

City of Norton Wastewater System

Wise Wastewater System

CNW Wastewater SystemCNW

Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

Wise Wastewater System

Josephine Pump Station

Legend

@ Pump Station @ Manhole

Force Main

— Gravity Main © Wise County Manhole —— Wise County Gravity Main Wise County Force Main HX) Wise Pump Station Wise Manhole ws —— Wise Gravity Main Wise Force Main CNW Force Main —— CNW Gravity Main CNW Manhole = +> City Boundary

Josephine CNW Wastewater System Pump Station

<aig

ine Wise County.

Wastewater System

pri

4,000 8,000

Feet

Wise Wastewater System

‘Wise County Wastewater System

Wise Wastewater System

caw /

Wastewater System

City of Norton Wastewater System Jj

USGS the National Map. NaBonal Boundinies Datasct,4OEP flevason Program, Geographic Names Information Sam, National Hydrography Dataset, National td Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems U.S, Census Boreay TIGERLine dts USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Dat; U.S, Deparment of State Mumanitaran Information Unt and NOMA atonal Centers for Envronmental information, US. Coastal Rel! Model Data elreshed lune, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CITY OF NORTON

WASTEWATER SYSTEM

PENNINGTON GAP COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF PENNINGTON GAP LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Pennington Gap collection system is located in central Lee County near the US Rte. 58 Alt. and US Rte. 421 intersection. The system is primarily located within road right-of-way and serves the Town of Pennington Gap and adjacent areas of Lee County. The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

840 Residential Customers 130 Commercial Customers 10 Industrial Customers 942 Other Municipal Systems 1922 Total Number of Customers

The system’s flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 15” through 6” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 60% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 75% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1991. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1963.

The system experiences blockages and overflow problems due to material and age-related line deterioration; line capacity problems due to inadequately sized lines and inflow and infiltration problems due to line separation and breakages.

The system includes one pump station:  Kentucky Avenue Pump Station – 240 GPM pump station serving the town of Pennington Gap west of

Morgan Ave. and Anderson St. intersection. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line northwest of the main influent lift station.

The system also collects flow from the Lee County PSA - Dryden, Ben Hur and St. Charles system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Pennington Gap WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Pennington Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0029599).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 7,811,000 N/A N/A

February 9,340,000 N/A N/A

March 14,493,000 N/A N/A

April 10,678,000 N/A N/A

May 7,014,000 N/A N/A

June 6,735,000 N/A N/A

July 6,581,000 N/A N/A

August 8,926,000 N/A N/A

September 8,336,000 N/A N/A

October 8,815,000 N/A N/A

November 7,456,000 N/A N/A

December 8,566,000 N/A N/A

Monthly Average 8,729,250 0 0.00%

Daily Average 290,975 0 0.00%

Avg / Customer 151 0

PENNINGTON GAP COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF PENNINGTON GAP. LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Pennington Gap collection system is located in central Lee County near the US Rte. 58 Alt, and US Rte. 421 intersection. The system is primarily located within road right-of-way and serves the Town of Pennington Gap and adjacent areas of Lee County.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

840 Residential Customers ‘Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

942 Other Municipal Systems 1922 Total Number of Customers

The system’s flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non-residential.

— se

The collection system consists of 15” through @” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 60% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 75% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1991. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1963,

‘The system experiences blockages and overflow problems due to material and age-related line deterioration; line capacity problems due to inadequately sized lines and inflow and infiltration problems due to line separation and breakages.

The system includes one pump station:

Kentucky Avenue Pump Station — 240 GPM pump station serving the town of Pennington Gap west of

Morgan Ave. and Anderson St. intersection. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line northwest of the main influent lift station,

The system also collects flow from the Lee County PSA - Dryden, Ben Hur and St. Charles system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Pennington Gap WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Pennington Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #V.A0029599).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 7,811,000 NA NA February 9,340,000 NA NA March 14,493,000 NA NA April 10,678,000 NIA NA May 7,014,000 NIA NA June 6,735,000 NIA NA July 6,581,000 NIA NIA August 8,926,000 NIA N/A September 8,336,000 NA NA October 8,815,000 NA N/A November 7,456,000 NIA N/A December 8,566,000 NIA NA Monthly Average 8,729,250 0 0.00%

Daily Average 290,975 0 0.00%

Avg / Customer 151 0

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Pennington Gap collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Age related line breaks and blockages

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.  Line replacement/upgrades

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes $N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022: (See Attached Step Rates)

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown if possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Town of Pennington Gap has a $56,725 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Pennington Gap collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. NA were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Age related line breaks and blockages

System Needs

Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.
Line replacement/upgrades

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system ig governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes SN/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022: (See Attached Step Rates)

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown if possible).

‘System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Town of Pennington Gap has a $56,725 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

PENNINGTON GAP WWTP – VPDES PERMIT # VA0029599 TOWN OF PENNINGTON GAP LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 391 S. Fork River Rd., Pennington Gap, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1964. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1992 and involved upgrade from 0.3 MGD to 0.6 MGD. The facility utilizes an oxidation ditch as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Pennington Gap, Lee Co. PSA – Ben Hur, Lee Co. PSA – Dryden and Lee Co. PSA - St. Charles collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.6 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.287 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.383 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 28 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to North Fork Powell River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by land application.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Town of Pennington Gap. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. _______ Class 1, X Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Belt Press Bearings  Oxidation Ditch drive coupler bearings  RAS Pumps – replace impeller, seals and check valve, issues with clogging

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Grit Removal System  Sludge Dewatering Press with feed pumps  Emergency Generator  Chlorine and Sulphur Dioxide system upgrade  Blower equipment roof  Upgraded monitoring equipment for flow and treatment parameters
 Variable Frequency Drive control motors for Oxidation Ditch  RAS Pump Replacement

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $4,000,000. (Include table breakdown if possible)

PENNINGTON GAP WWTP - VPDES PERMIT # VA0029599 TOWN OF PENNINGTON GAP LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 391 S. Fork River Rd., Pennington Gap, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1964. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1992 and involved upgrade from 0.3 MGD to 0.6 MGD. The facility utilizes an oxidation ditch as the method of sewage treatment. Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Pennington Gap, Co. PSA — Ben Hur, Lee Co, PSA - Dryden and Lee Co. PSA - St. Charles collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.6 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.287 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.383 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 28 days during this period. Effluent from the plant discharged to North Fork Powell River, Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by land application

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by Town of Pennington Gap. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. Class 1, X Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

«Belt Press Bearings

Oxidation Ditch drive coupler bearings
RAS Pumps - replace impeller, seals and check valve, issues with clogging

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Grit Removal System

Sludge Dewatering Press with feed pumps

Emergency Generator

Chlorine and Sulphur Dioxide system upgrade

Blower equipment roof

Upgraded monitoring equipment for flow and treatment parameters Variable Frequency Drive control motors for Oxidation Ditch RAS Pump Replacement

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $4,000,000, (Include table breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/13/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F PE

N N

IN G

TO N

G AP

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM /

[Ú

[Ú TPWW

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

TPWW WWTP

[Ú Pump Station

[Ú Lee County Pump Station

Lee County Manhole

Lee County Gravity Main

Lee County Force Main

[Ú Dryden Pump Station

Dryden Force Main

Dryden Gravity Main

Dryden Manhole

Town Boundary

Lee County - Ben Hur Wastewater System

Town of Pennington Gap Wastewater System

Lee County - St. Charles Wastewater System

Dryden Wastewater System

Main St Pump Station

Legend @ = Manhole —= Gravity Main

f=] wwtp

Pump station

[Hl Lee County Pump Station @ Lee County Manhole

—— Lee County Gravity Main

Lee County Force Main

Dryden Pump Station

==> Dryden Force Main

—— Dryden Gravity Main Dryden Manhole ‘Town Boundary

Lee County ~ Ben Hur Wastewater System

Lee County - St. Charles Wastewater System

‘Town of Pennington Gap Wastewater System

0 500 1,000 2,000

3,000

4,000 Feet

Main St Pump Station

Dryden Wastewater System

and Cover Oatbase, National Structures Oatse, and National Tansh Dataset; USGS Global Eomytems US. Census Bureau TIGERY/Line data Data Natural Earth Data; US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Infor

Geographic Names Information System, atonal Hydrography Dataseh Sa

Model Data reese ne, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF PENNINGTON GAP WASTEWATER SYSTEM

DUFFIELD COLLECTION SYSTEM
SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Duffield collection system serves the town of Duffield located in central Scott County near the US Rte. 58 Alt. and US Rte. 23 intersection. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 1977. The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

99 Residential Customers 32 Commercial Customers 20 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

151 Total Number of Customers The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 40% residential and 60% non- residential. The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1977. No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes two pump stations:

 Main Lift Pump Station – 330/420/550 GPM suction pump station serving the entire collection system.
The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line north of the Duffield WWTP.

 Thomas Village Pump Station – 200 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the intersection. The pump station discharges through a 3” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along Duff Patt Hwy.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Duffield WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Duffield WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0029564).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 7,223,000 3,480,794 48.19%

February 8,708,000 4,060,000 46.62%

March 9,021,000 3,299,000 36.57%

April 6,072,000 3,433,000 56.54%

May 6,014,000 3,655,000 60.77%

June 5,730,000 2,978,000 51.97%

July 5,921,000 2,817,000 47.58%

August 5,859,000 3,042,000 51.92%

September 5,400,000 2,021,000 37.43%

October 4,092,000 2,202,000 53.81%

November 3,480,000 2,125,000 61.06%

December 4,247,000 2,135,000 50.27%

Monthly Average 5,980,583 2,937,316 49.11%

Daily Average 199,353 97,911 49.11%

Avg / Customer 1,320 648

DUFFIELD COLLECTION SYSTEM SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Duffield collection system serves the town of Duffield located in central Scott County near the US Rte. 58 Alt. and US Rte. 23 intersection. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 1977.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

99 Residential Customers

32 Commercial Customers

20 Industrial Customers

0 Other Municipal Systems

151 Total Number of Customers ‘The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 40% residential and 60% non- residential, The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines, It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1977. No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes two pump stations:

Main Lift Pump Station — 330/420/550 GPM suetion pump station serving the entire collection system. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line north of the Duffield WWTP.

Thomas Village Pump Station - 200 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the intersection. The pump station discharges through a 3” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along Duff Patt Hwy.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Duffield WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Duffield WWTP (VPDES Permit #V 40029564).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. ‘A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 7,223,000 3,480,794 48.19% February 8,708,000 4,060,000 46.62% March 9,021,000 3,299,000 36.57% April 6,072,000 3,433,000 56.54% May 6,014,000 3,655,000 60.77% June 5,730,000 2,978,000 51.97% July 5,921,000 2,817,000 47.58% August 5,859,000 3,042,000 51.92% September 5,400,000 2,021,000 37.43% October 4,092,000 2,202,000 53.81% November 3,480,000 2,125,000 61.06% December 4,247,000 2,135,000 50.27% Monthly Average 5,980,583 2,937,316 49.11% Daily Average 199,353 97,911 49.11%

Avg/ Customer 1,320 648

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Duffield collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance including trash in wet wells

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on August 1, 2022:

Residential……………………………………$33.18 first 2,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 2,000 gal

Non-residential…………………………….$64.63 first 4,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 4,000 gal

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Scott Co. PSA has a $247,577 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Duffield collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021, N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A. were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. ‘The consent order is dated N/A and was because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance including trash in wet wells System Needs

Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in NA, The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A. Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on August 1, 2022:

Residential. …$33.18 first 2,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 2,000 gal

Non-residential. $64.63 first 4,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 4,000 gal

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is STBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans ‘The Scott Co. PSA has a $247,577 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

DUFFIELD WWTP – VPDES PERMIT # VA0029564 SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 293 Duff Patt Hwy in Duffield, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1987. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2018 and involved updating grit equipment, chlorination system, sewer grinder and aeration diffusers. The facility utilizes a 0.40 MGD oxidation ditch as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Duffield collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.40 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.20 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.277 MGD.
The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 75 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to North Fork Clinch River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Scott Co. PSA. Currently, 3 full time and 1 part time licensed operators work at the facility. _______ Class 1, X_ Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Primary Pumps and Emergency Pump maintenance at Main Lift Station  Trash in wet wells

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Plant control valves need to be replaced  Chlorine and Sulfur Dioxide scales need to be replaced  Block walls for sludge drying beds need repair

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $TBD. (Include breakdown if possible)

DUFFIELD WWTP — VPDES PERMIT # VA0029564 SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 293 Duff Patt Hwy in Duffield, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1987. The last major

upgrade/expansion was completed in 2018 and involved updating grit equipment, chlorination system. sewer grinder and aeration diffusers. The facility utilizes a 0.40 MGD oxidation ditch as the method of

sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Duffield collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.40 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.20 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.277 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 75 days during this period, Effluent from the plant is to North Fork Clinch River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by land!

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by Seott Co. PSA. Currently, 3 full time and 1 part time licensed operators work at the facility, Class 1, Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Vi result of N/A.

ins ~ The facility has had @ permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows’

Primary Pumps and Emergency Pump maintenance at Main Lift Station © Trash in wet wells

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Plant control valves need to be replaced © Chlorine and Sulfur Dioxide scales need to be replaced
Block walls for sludge drying beds need repair

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is STBD. (Include breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/01/2022

IJR

2248

D U

FF IE

LD W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Duffield Wastewater System

Legend

@ Manhole — Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Duffield ‘Wastewater System

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 a Feet

field

a, . ’ 127 Geographic Names information System, National Hyograpy Dataset, Navona

and Cover Database, National tuctures Dataset, and National Transporation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/ine dts, USFS Road ata; Natural arth Oats; US. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unt; and NOAA Natal Centers for Enuironmental information, US. Coastal Rl Model. Data refreshed Jone, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

DUFFIELD IASTEWATER, SYSTEM

HOLSTON REGIONAL COLLECTION SYSTEM
SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Holston Regional collection system serves Webber City and adjacent communities of located in southern central Scott County at the US Rte. 58 Alt. and US Rte. 23 intersection. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2002.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

955 Residential Customers 31 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

986 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 12” through 6” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2010. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1982.

No area(s) of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes three pump stations:

 Yuma 1 Pump Station – 100 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of intersection.
The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System.

 Yuma 2 – 80 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the intersection. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System.

 Oakwood & Holston Terrace Pump Station – 150-300 & 41 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System.

 Moccasin Gap & Gate City Pump Station – 400-450 & 900 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from Moccasin Gap and Gate City areas. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into HRSS system. The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Holston Regional (HRSS) WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Holston Regional (HRSS) WWTP (VPDES Permit # VA0067351).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 6,009,000 983,221 16.36%

February 6,873,000 632,197 9.20%

March 7,784,000 540,741 6.95%

April 4,790,000 412,740 8.62%

HOLSTON REGIONAL COLLECTION SYSTEM SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Holston Regional collection system serves Webber City and adjacent communities of located in southern central Scott County at the US Rte. 58 Alt. and US Rte. 23 intersection. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2002.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers

31 Commercial Customers

0 Industrial Customers

0 Other Municipal Systems 986 Total Number of Customers

The system’ residential.

customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non-

The collection system consists of 12” through 6” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2010, The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1982.

No area(s) of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

‘The system includes three pump stations:

© Yuma | Pump Station ~ 100 Gem submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of intersection. ‘The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line, The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System

Yuma 2—80 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the intersection, The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System.
Oakwood & Holston Terrace Pump Station — 150-300 & 41 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System.
Moccasin Gap & Gate City Pump Station ~ 400-450 & 900 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from Moceasin Gap and Gate City areas. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into HRSS system. The receiving sewer system is part of the Scott County PSA’s Sewer System.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Holston Regional (HRSS) WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Holston Regional (HRSS) WWTP (VPDES Permit # VA0067351),

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 6,009,000 983,221 16.36% February 6,873,000 632,197 9.20% March, 7,784,000 540,741 6.95%

April 4,790,000 412,740 8.62%

May 3,476,000 482,246 13.87%

June 3,651,000 612,792 16.78%

July 3,853,000 624,537 16.21%

August 4,593,000 540,063 11.76%

September 3,334,000 665,128 19.95%

October 2,441,000 634,672 26.00%

November 2,388,000 507,487 21.25%

December 2,373,000 529,899 22.33%

Monthly Average 4,297,083 597,144 13.90%

Daily Average 143,236 19,905 13.90%

Avg / Customer 145

***Note: The flows above do not include flows or billings from Gate City.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The HRSS collection system had 1 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 100% were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow (I/I from Gate City System), 0 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.
Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration and inflow during heavy rain events

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on August 1, 2022:

Residential……………………………………$33.18 first 2,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 2,000 gal

Non-residential…………………………….$64.63 first 4,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 4,000 gal

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Scott Co. PSA has a $247,577 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

May 3,476,000 482,246 13.87%

June 3,651,000 612,792 16.78% July 3,853,000 624,537 16.21% August 4,593,000 540,063 11.76% September 3,334,000 665,128 19.95% October 2,441,000 634,672 26.00% November 2,388,000 507,487 21.25% December 2,373,000 529,899 22.33% Monthly Average 4,297,083 597,144 13.90% Daily Average 143,236 19,905 13.90% Avg / Customer 145,

***Note: The flows above do not include flows or billings from Gate City. Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The HSS collection system had J reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 100% were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow (1/1 from Gate City System), 0 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Infiltration and inflow during heavy rain events System Needs © Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. Sewer Use Ordinance

‘The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance, The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in NA, The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rati

rructure The following sewer rate structure was last modified on August 1, 2022:

Residential…ccssssssees $33.18 first 2,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 2,000 gal …864.63 first 4,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 4,000 gal

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is STBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The Scott Co. PSA has a $247,577 annual sewer debt service.

Non-residential.

‘The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

HOLSTON REGIONAL (HRSS) WWTP – VPDES PERMIT # VA0067351 SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 650 Quail Run Lane, Weber City, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1984. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2008 and involved expanding the plant from 0.3 MGD to 1.25 MGD. The facility utilizes an oxidation ditch as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the HRSS and Gate City collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 1.25 MGD.
The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.143 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.230 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 18 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to North Fork Holston River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Scott Co. PSA. Currently, 2 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. _______ Class 1, X Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows: During periods of heavy rain I/I causes:

 Overflows at bar screen and UV channel  Rising solids in clarifier  Entrance Road washout

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Additional drying bed space and/or belt press  Main Lift Station roof repair  Digester Dewatering Valve repair/replacement  Install Equalization Basin

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $TBD. (Include breakdown if possible)

HOLSTON REGIONAL (HRSS) WWTP - VPDES PERMIT # VA0067351 SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 650 Quail Run Lane, Weber City, VA (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1984. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2008 and involved expanding the plant from 0.3 MGD to 1.25 MGD. The facility utilizes an oxidation ditch as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the HRSS and Gate City collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 1.25 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.143 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 ‘was 0.230 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 18 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to North Fork Holston River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by landfill,

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by Scott Co. PSA. Currently, 2 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility Class 1, X Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows: During periods of heavy rain I/I causes:

Overflows at bar screen and UV channel
Rising solids in clarifier

«Entrance Road washout

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Additional drying bed space and/or belt press
Main Lift Station roof repair
Digester Dewatering Valve repair/replacement
Install Equalization Basin

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is STBD. (Include breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/16/2022

IJR

2248

SC O

TT C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

W EB

ER CI

TY /

[Ú

TPWW

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

TPWW WWTP

Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

Gate City Manhole

Gate City Gravity Main

Town Boundary Scott County - Weber City Subsystem

Town of Gate City Wastewater System

Gate City Pump Station

Moccasin Creek Pump Station

Oakwood Pump Station

Legend [H)_ Pump Station (&j wwte @ Manhole — Gravity Main ©=+ Force Main © Gate City Manhole — Gate City Gravity Main ‘ Town Boundary

‘Oakwood Pump Station

Scott County - Weber City Subsystem

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 a = ect

Moccasin Creek Pump Station

“Town of Gate City y. Wastewater System Gate City Pump Station

USGS The Nationa Map: Nationa Sounderide aiaset, 3OEP Elevation rogram, Geograph Names Information Sher, National Hysfopaphy Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems US. Census Bureau TIGER dat; USFS Rod Data Natural Earth Data US. Deparment af State Humantarian Information Un, pd NOAA National Centers for Enuironmertall Information U.S, Coastal Rell Model, Ota efeshed kine 2022,

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CITY

SCOTT COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - WEBER

= i

NICKELSVILLE COLLECTION SYSTEM
SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Nickelsville collection system serves the town of Nickelsville located in eastern Scott County along US Rte. 71 approximately 4.5 miles from the Scott/Russell county line. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 1987.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

227 Residential Customers 20 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

247 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes three pump stations:

 Taylor Street Pump Station – 12 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the Taylor St. area. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer.

 Lamplight Pump Station – 26 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the intersection. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

 Meade Street Pump Station – 13 GPM submersible grinder pump station that receives flow from Meade and Green St areas. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

The system also collects flow from N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Nickelsville WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Nickelsville WWTP (VPDES Permit #_VA0087955).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 1,054,000 614,000 58.25%

February 924,000 685,000 74.13%

March 1,860,000 585,000 31.45%

April 1,500,000 571,000 38.07%

May 1,550,000 728,000 46.97%

June 1,300,000 701,000 53.92%

July 1,085,000 643,000 59.26%

August 992,000 695,000 70.06%

September 780,000 623,000 79.87%

NICKELSVILLE COLLECTION SYSTEM SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Nickelsville collection system serves the town of Nickelsville located in eastern Scott County along US Rte. 71 approximately 4.5 miles from the Scott/Russell county line. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 1987.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

227 Residential Customers

20 Commercial Customers

0 Industrial Customers

0 Other Municipal Systems 247 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

‘The system includes three pump stations:

Taylor Street Pump Station — 12. GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the Taylor St. area. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer.

© Lamplight Pump Station — 26 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the intersection. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

Meade Street Pump Station ~ 13 GPM submersible grinder pump station that receives flow from Meade and Green St areas. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line

The system also collects flow from N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Nickelsville WWTP. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Nickelsville WWTP (VPDES Permit #_VA0087955).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,054,000 614,000 58.25% February 924,000 685,000 74.13% March 1,860,000 585,000 31.45% April 1,500,000 571,000 38.07% May 1,550,000 728,000 46.97% June 1,300,000 701,000 53.92% July 1,085,000 643,000 59.26% August 992,000 695,000 70.06%

September 780,000 623,000 798™%

October 775,000 766,000 98.84%

November 660,000 700,000 106.06%

December 713,000 612,000 85.83%

Monthly Average 1,099,417 660,250 60.05%

Daily Average 36,647 22,008 60.05%

Avg / Customer 148 89

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Nickelsville collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

 Pump Stations rehab  Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on August 1, 2022:

Residential……………………………………$33.18 first 2,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 2,000 gal

Non-residential…………………………….$64.63 first 4,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 4,000 gal

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown if possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Scott Co. PSA has a $247,577 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

October 775,000 766,000 98.84%

November 660,000 700,000 106.06% December 713,000 612,000 85.83% Monthly Average 1,099,417 660,250 60.05% Daily Average 36,647 22,008 60.05% Avg / Customer 148 89

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Nickelsville collection system had reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. NA were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had @ permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance System Needs
Pump Stations rehab

Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently years.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

CIP adopted in N/A. The CIP includes N/A of projects for completion in the next 5

Sewer Rate Structure ‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on August 1, 2022: Residential …0…ccssscseeeeesseeeeeesssen$33.18 first 2,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 2,000 gal

Non-residential. $64.63 first 4,000 gal; $14.41 per 1,000 gal over 4,000 gal

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown if possible)

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The Scott Co. PSA has a $247,577 annual sewer debt service. The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

NICKELSVILLE WWTP – VPDES PERMIT # VA0087955 SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at the end of SR T1018 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1987. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in N/A and involved N/A. The facility utilizes a 0.070 MGD secondary-activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Nickelsville collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.070 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.036 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.054 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 75 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to North Fork Clinch River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by landfill.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Adjusting air to reactors and digester

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 New air piping and diffusers  New electrical controls including a timer on blowers  Alarms for equipment failures

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown if possible)

NICKELSVILLE WWTP — VPDES PERMIT # VA0087955 SCOTT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at the end of SR T1018 (see attached general vicinity map). ‘The facility was originally constructed in 1987, The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in N/A and involved N/A. The facility utilizes a 0.070 MGD secondary-activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Niekelsville collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.070 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.036 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.054 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 75 days during this period. Effluent from the plant

is discharged to North Fork Clinch River, Sludge from the facility is disposed of at/by landfill.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by Scott Co. PSA. Currently, 3 full time and I part time licensed operators work at the facility. Class 1,X_ Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Adjusting air to reactors and digester

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

New air piping and diffusers
New electrical controls including a timer on blowers Alarms for equipment failures

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is STBD. (Include table breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/16/2022

IJR

2248

SC O

TT C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

N IC

KE LS

VI LL

E /

[Ú

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

[Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Town Boundary

Scott County - Wastewater System

Meade Street Pump Station

Taylor Street Pump Station

Lamp Lighter Pump Station

‘Scott County -

‘Wastewater System

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Taylor Street m Hall 4 ump Station . ickelsville 3 ce wy Zeog as=s Ge=hqo Eo f / SM boas oO Meade Street n = = . Pump Staion

Legend @ Manhole

— Gravity Main [Bl Pump Station = Force Main

Town Boundary

Names Information System, Navonal Hysrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database,

National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems Sars Gia

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; US. Department of] femme

a pe TY State Humanitarian Information Unt; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental =

Information U.S. Coastal Relief Mode, Ota refteshed June, 2022, Tne

TOWN OF ST. PAUL COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF ST. PAUL, VIRIGNIA LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of St. Paul is located in Wise County, Virginia on the Russell County line and provides public sewer service to 410 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits. The sewage collection system includes approximately 8 +/- miles of 4”-12” gravity/force main sewer lines and four (4) pump stations. The sewer is treated at the Town’s Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

334 Residential Customers 76 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

410 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 78% residential and 22% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity/force main sewer lines. It is estimated that approximately 25% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 25% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2019. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970’s.

The system experiences no problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes five pump stations:

 Main Pump Station – Pump capacity of 1000 GPM. Constructed in 1972 and upgraded in 2015

 South St. Paul Pump Station – Pump capacity of 100 GPM. Constructed in 1980 and upgraded in 2014

 West Hill Main Pump Station – Pump capacity of 50 GPM.

 West Hill Pump Station – Pump capacity of 10 GPM. Constructed in 2021

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of St. Paul Wastewater Treatment Plant. (VPDES Permit #VA0026221).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 2,446,000 1,313,000 53.6%

February 2,808,100 1,322,700 47.1%

March 3,637,000 1,327,490 36.4%

April 2,728,000 1,490,850 54.6%

May 2,180,000 1,323,560 60.7%

June 1,976,900 1,607,330 81.3%

July 2,177,000 1,363,170 62.6%

August 2,483,800 1,536,400 61.8%

September 2,143,800 1,541,700 71.9%

October 2,374,100 1,596,770 67.2%

November 2,167,500 1,641,580 75.7%

December 2,395,600 1,397,110 58.3%

Monthly Average 2,459,816 1,455,138 60.9%

Daily Average 81,993 48,504

TOWN OF ST. PAUL COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF ST. PAUL, VIRIGNIA LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of St. Paul is located in Wise County, Virginia on the Russell County line and provides public sewer service to 410 +/- customers within the Town’s corporate limits. The sewage collection system includes approximately 8 +/- miles of 4°-12” gravity/foree main sewer lines and four (4) pump stations. The sewer is treated at the Town’s Wastewater Treatment Plant.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers 76 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

0 0 — Other Municipal Systems 410 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 78% residential and 22% non- residential

The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity/force main sewer lines. Itis estimated that approximately 25% of the system consists of terra cotta or conerete lines and approximately 25% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2019. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970’s.

The system experiences no problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The syste

Main Pump Station - Pump capacity of 1000 GPM. Constructed in 1972 and upgraded in 2015

cludes five pump stations:

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of St. Paul Wastewater Treatment Plant. (VPDES Permit #V.A0026221).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as

follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 2,446,000 1,313,000 53.6% February 2,808,100 1,322,700 471% March 3,637,000 1,327,490 36.4% Apri 2,728,000 1,490,850 54.6% May 2,180,000 1,323,560 60.7% June 1,976,900 1,607,330 81.3% July 2,177,000 1,363,170 62.6% August 2,483,800 1,536,400 61.8% September 2,143,800 1,541,700 119% October 2,374,100 1,596,770 67.2% November 2,167,500 1,641,580 75.1% December 2,395,600 1,397,110 58.3% Monthly Average 2,459,816 1,455,138 60.9%

Daily Average 81,993 48,504

Avg / Customer 199.9 118

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Infiltration/Inflow

System Needs – Improvement projects that have identified include:

As a result of the SSES prepared in May 2022, the Town has submitted a funding application to VDEQ in the amount of $892,300 for the St. Paul Sewer System Improvements Project. The proposed project includes CIPP liner of 3,370 LF of existing 8-inch gravity sewer line, as well as the rehabilitation via geo-polymer coating of 421 VF of manhole walls, replacement of 6 manhole frames and covers, and replacement of two manholes. These improvements to the existing sewer system are intended to reduce RDII from entering the system. Additionally, the CIPP liner is proposed for existing vitrified clay pipe (VCP) which is nearing the end of its anticipated lifespan. Lining of VCP-portion of the system will prevent future excessive RDII entrance, which is expected in the upcoming years if the existing VCP is left in-place, as-is.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the entire area of the system by The Lane Group in May 2022.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in May 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2018

 Residential (in-town) - $14.25/1,500 gallons - $6.45/over 1,500 gallons – Sewer is 110% of water bill  Residential (out-of-town) – $26.00/1,500 gallons - $10.25/over 1,500 gallons – Sewer is 110% of water bill  Commercial (in-town) - $14.25/1,500 gallons - $6.45/over 1,500 gallons – Sewer is 110% of water bill  Commercial (out-of-town) - $26.00/1,500 gallons - $10.25/over 1,500 gallons – Sewer is 110% of water bill

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $892,300. There is an application currently submitted to VDEQ for these improvements.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Downtown/West Hills Sewer Project - $1,449,674 - USDA Rural Development – June 2059

Wastewater Treatment Plant - $1,853,560 – VDEQ/VRA – October 2038

Dominion Project - $1,520,379 (1/3 water, 1/3 sanitary sewer, 1/3 industrial wastewater) Miners Exchange Bank – January 2030

118

The collection system had O,reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years, © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

‘As a result of the SSES prepared in May 2022, the Town has submitted a funding application to VDEQ in the amount of $892,300 for the St. Paul Sewer System Improvements Project. The proposed project includes CIPP liner of 3,370 LF of existing 8-inch gravity sewer line, as well as the rehabilitation via geo-polymer coating of 421 VF of manhole walls, replacement of 6 manhole frames and covers, and replacement of two manholes. These improvements to the existing sewer system are intended to reduce RDII from entering the system. Additionally, the CIPP liner is proposed for existing vitrified clay pipe (VCP) which is nearing the end of its anticipated lifespan, Lining of VCP-portion of the system will prevent future excessive RDI entrance, which is expected in the upcoming years if the existing VCP is left in-place, as-is.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

‘A SSES was performed on the entire area of the system by The Lane Group in May 2022. Capital Improvements Plan

The Town does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in May 2022. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2018

© Residential (out-of-town) ~ $26.00/1,500 gallons - $10.25/over 1,500 gallons ~ Sewer is 110% of water bill Commercial (in-town) - $14.25/1,500 gallons - $6.4S/over 1,500 gallons ~ Sewer is 110% of water bill

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $892,300. There is an application currently submitted to VDEQ for these improvements.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans Downtown/West Hills Sewer Project - $1,449,674 - USDA Rural Development ~ June 2059 Wastewater Treatment Plant - $1,853,560 ~ VDEQ/VRA ~ October 2038

Dominion Project - $1,520,379 (1/3 water, 1/3 sanitary sewer, 1/3 industrial wastewater) Miners Exchange Bank — January 2030

TOWN OF ST. PAUL WWTP – VPDES PERMIT #VA0026221 TOWN OF ST. PAUL, VIRGINIA LENOWISCO PDC

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 16379 Bush Drive, St. Paul, Virginia 24283 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 2016. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2016. The facility utilizes membrane filtration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of St. Paul collection system along with Russell County Public Service Authority’s Castlewood and Dante sewer systems. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.50 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 81,993. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 101,9223. The facility did not exceed 80% capacity during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Clinch River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at the landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of St. Paul. Currently four full time and four part time licensed operators work at the facility. One is a Class 1, one is a Class 2, and two Class 3 operators. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day/5 days per week and 4 hours/day/weekends.

Permit Violations – The facility has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Age of equipment  Availability of replacement parts for existing equipment.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 A second Drum Screen

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $? (Including related costs and contingencies)

TOWN OF ST. PAUL WWTP - VPDES PERMIT #VA0026221 TOWN OF ST. PAUL, VIRGINIA LENOWISCO PDC

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 16379 Bush Drive, St. Paul, Virginia 24283 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 2016. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2016. The facility utilizes membrane filtration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of St. Paul collection system along with Russell County Public Service Authority’s Castlewood and Dante sewer systems, The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.50 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 81,993. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 101,9223. The facility did not exceed 80% capacity during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Clinch River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at the landfill.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of St, Paul. Currently four full time and four part time licensed operators work at the facility. One is a Class 1, one is a Class 2, and two Class 3 operators. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day/5 days per week and 4 hours/day/weekends,

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Age of equipment © Availability of replacement parts for existing equipment,

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Asecond Drum Screen

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the

identified facility improvements is $? (Including related costs and contingencies)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/15/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F ST

. PA

U L

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

N O

RT H

AR EA

[Ú

TPWW

0 500 1,000 1,500250

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole TPWW WWTP

Force Main

Gravity Main

Private Pump Station

Castlewood Manhole

Castlewood Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Town of St. Paul Wastewater System Castlewood

Wastewater System

Sunset #1 Pump Station

Sunset #2 Pump Station

Highland Pump Station

Dogwood Pump Station

Main Pump Station

South St. Paul Pump Station

Sunset #1 Pump Station

Highland Pump Station

Dogwood Pump Station

‘Sunset #2 Pump Station

“Town of St. Paul Wastewater System

Legend [© Pump Station @ Manhole fl wtp = Force Main — Gravity Main A Private Pump Station Castlewood Manhole

— Castlewood Gravity Main

! Town Boundary

0 250 500 1,000

ee Feet

1,500

unt Paul

Main Pump Station

Seeeelleee-5

Castlewood Wastewater System

South St. Paul Pump Station

USGS The jyatfoal Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names| iomaach Syren, National Hypny set, Ratios Lind Cover Ostbae,Natena Src Qatas£t, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data;} «© O35 fond Data Natal Eth Onn US. Depornat of Ste Himantarin information Unt NOAA avon Centr or net frat Us, Conta Ree Woe bat eered e222

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WASTEWATER AREA

TOWN OF ST. PAUL SYSTEM - NORTH

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/15/2022

IJR

2248

[Ú

0 500 1,000 1,500250

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole TPWW WWTP

Private Pump Station

Force Main

Gravity Main

Castlewood Manhole

Castlewood Gravity Main

Castlewood Force Main

Town Boundary

Town of St. Paul Wastewater System

TO W

N O

F ST

. PA

U L

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

S O

U TH

AR EA

Castlewood Wastewater System

South St. Paul Pump Station

West Hills Pump Station

Legend

[Pump Station

\ @ Manhole . 9 i wr ee \ A Private Pump Station
1 ==> Force Main d

— Gravity Main

Castlewood Force Main ‘t Town Boundary

‘Town of St, Paul Wastewater System

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

7 West Hills

ST] Pump Station

Castlewood Wastewater System

AREA

TOWN OF ST. PAUL WASTEWATER SYSTEM - SOUTH

‘Castlewood Wastewater System

South St. Paul

Pump Station

USGS The National Map: Navional Boundaries Dataset, 30EP Elevation Program, Geograph Names

Information Stem, Natonal Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures] [SRT PSSe

Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset USGS Global Ecosystoms; US. Census Bureau TIGER/une dt: FE

USFS Road Data; Natura Earth Data; US. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit: 3nd NOAA} =

‘Navona Centers for Enirnmenta information, U.S, Coartal Reif Model, Data refreshed une 2022, Ss

EXETER/IMBODEN COLLECTION SYSTEM
WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Exeter/Imboden collection system serves the unincorporated communities of Exeter and Imboden located in western Wise County along SR 68 between Appalachia and Keokee. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2002.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

152 Residential Customers 0 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

152 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% residential and 0% non- residential. The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2002. No area(s) of the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

 Upper Exeter Pump Station – 150 GPM pump station with self-priming suction pumps serving the Upper Exeter area located along SR 68 approximately 600 ft north east of the SR68 and SR 870 intersection.
The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Appalachia collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020940).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 253,200 N/A

February N/A 265,700 N/A

March N/A 251,000 N/A

April N/A 297,600 N/A

May N/A 242,900 N/A

June N/A 549,400 N/A

July N/A 273,500 N/A

August N/A 308,900 N/A

September N/A 283,300 N/A

October N/A 242,000 N/A

November N/A 239,900 N/A

December N/A 255,300 N/A

Monthly Average 0 288,558 N/A

Daily Average 0 9,619 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 84

EXETER/IMBODEN COLLECTION SYSTEM WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Exeter/Imboden collection system serves the unincorporated communities of Exeter and Imboden located in western Wise County along SR 68 between Appalachia and Keokee. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2002.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be: 152 Residential Customers

Commercial Customers

Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems 152 Total Number of Customers

icicle

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% residential and 0% non- residential. The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or conerete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2002

‘No area(s) of the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

Upper Exeter Pump Station ~ 150 GPM pump station with self:priming suction pumps serving the Upper Exeter area located along SR 68 approximately 600 ft north east of the SR68 and SR 870 inters The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Appalachia collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #V 40020940).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Accountable January 2021 NA 253,200 NA February NA 265,700 NA Mareh NA 251,000 NA April N/A 297,600 NA May NA 242,900 NA June N/A 549,400 NIA July N/A 273,500 N/A August NA 308,900 NA September NA 283,300 NA October NA 242,000 NA November NA 239,900 NA December NA 255,300 NA Monthly Average 0 288,558 NA Daily Average 0 9,619 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 84

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Exeter/Imboden collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Frequent issues with FOG, STEP/STEG and decentralized treatment

System Needs

 Remove septic tanks and install traditional gravity lines to pump station.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $12,075,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 1st 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Exeter/Imboden collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year

N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Frequent issues with FOG, STEP/STEG and decentralized treatment System Needs
Remove septic tanks and install traditional gravity lines to pump station, Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021, The CIP i next 5 years.

Judes $12,075,300 of projects for completi

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022: Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 Ist 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service. The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

FAIRGROUNDS COLLECTION SYSTEM
WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Fairgrounds collection system serves the unincorporated areas located in central Wise County along SR 680 and SR 802. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2010.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

26 Residential Customers 1 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 27 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 98% residential and 2% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2022. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2010.

No area(s) of the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station(s):

 Airport Hollow Pump Station – 180 GPM sewage pump station that receives flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.
The receiving sewer system is part of the Wise County PSA’s Sewer System.

The system also collects flow from N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Town of Wise system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the C-N-W Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 93,600 N/A

February N/A 85,400 N/A

March N/A 77,800 N/A

April N/A 84,500 N/A

May N/A 87,700 N/A

June N/A 92,900 N/A

July N/A 149,300 N/A

August N/A 103,600 N/A

September N/A 89,100 N/A

October N/A 109,300 N/A

November N/A 100,400 N/A

December N/A 82,300 N/A

Monthly Average 0 96,325 N/A

Daily Average 0 3,211 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 119

FAIRGROUNDS COLLECTION SYSTEM WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Fairgrounds collection system serves the unincorporated areas located in central Wise County along SR 680 and SR 802. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2010.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers,

Ricci

‘The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 98% residential and 2% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2022. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2010,

No area(s) of the system experience problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station(s):

Airport Hollow Pump Station — 180 GPM sewage pump station that receives flow from this collection system, The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Wise County PSA’s Sewer System.

The system also collects flow from N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Town of Wise system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the C-N-W Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #V A0077828)

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Percent Month Treated Accountable January 2021 N/A NA February N/A N/A Mareh N/A N/A April N/A N/A May N/A NA June NIA NA July N/A 149,300 N/A August N/A 103,600 N/A September N/A 89,100 N/A October N/A 109,300 N/A November N/A 100,400, NA December NIA 82,300 NA Monthly Average 0 96,325 N/A Daily Average 0 3,211 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 119

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Fairgrounds collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Issues with I/I and intermittent high flow from fairground activities.

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $12,075,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 1st 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Fairgrounds collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. NA were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A. The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was because N/A. Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Issues with I/T and intermittent high flow from fairground activities.

System Needs Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021, The CIP i next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Judes $12,075,300 of projects for completi

Sewer Rate Structure ‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 Ist 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after; Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service. The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER S

YS TE

M

FA IR

G R O

U N

D S

SE W

ER /

[Ú

0 500 1,000 1,500250

Feet

Wise County Wastewater System

Wise Wastewater System

Airport Hollow Pump Station

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

[Ú Pump Station

Wise Manhole

Wise Gravity Main

Legend @ Manhole — Gravity Main == Force Main (Pump Station @ Wise Manhole

—— Wise Gravity Main

Wise Wastewater System

‘Airport Hollow Pump Station

Wise County Wastewater System

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dstset,3DEP Elevation Prosam Geographic Nomis Information Stern, National ygrography Dataset, Natonol Lond Cover Database, Naonal Structures Ostet, and National Transportation Datatet- USGS Gaba fonatems US. Census Butea TIGER/tine dat; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Oat; US. Department ff Stale Humanitarian information Unt; and NORA Natonal Centers for Eovgnmental Infrmtion, Us. Coastal Relief Model. Data efteshe une, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER SYSTEM

FAIRGROUNDS SEWER]

GUEST RIVER COLLECTION SYSTEM
WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Guest River collection system serves the unincorporated areas along the Guest River in central Wise County along SR 620 north of the City of Norton. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2009.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

139 Residential Customers 2 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

141 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2009.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

There are no pump stations within this system.

The system also collects flow from then N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the City of Norton system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the C-N-W Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 394,300 N/A

February N/A 373,000 N/A

March N/A 336,400 N/A

April N/A 388,000 N/A

May N/A 350,900 N/A

June N/A 379,300 N/A

July N/A 508,500 N/A

August N/A 483,100 N/A

September N/A 378,200 N/A

October N/A 352,800 N/A

November N/A 330,400 N/A

December N/A 371,400 N/A

Monthly Average 0 387,192 N/A

Daily Average 0 12,906 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 92

GUEST RIVER COLLECTION SYSTEM WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Guest River collection system serves the unincorporated areas along the Guest River in central Wise County along SR 620 north of the City of Norton. The oldest portions of the collection system ‘were constructed in 2009.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers.

Eicon

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 24” gravity lines, It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020, The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2009,

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

There are no pump stations within this system. The system also collects flow from then N/A system(s),

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the City of Norton system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the C-N-W Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #V 0077828)

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station, A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 N/A 394,300 NA February N/A 373,000 NA March NA 336,400 NA April N/A 388,000 NIA May N/A 350,900 N/A June N/A 379,300 N/A July N/A 508,500 N/A August N/A 483,100 NA September N/A 378,200 N/A October NIA 352,800 NIA November N/A 330,400 N/A December N/A 371,400 N/A Monthly Average 0 387,192 NA Daily Average 0 12,906 NA

Avg/ Customer 0 2

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Guest River collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 The main trunkline installed between 2009-2010 was increased to 24” due to slope issues. I/I due to construction issues is known.

System Needs

 I/I identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $12,075,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 1st 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Guest River collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. NA were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued because N/A. Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

The main trunkline installed between 2009-2010 was increased to 24” due to slope issues. /I due to construction issues is known.

System Needs

Vlidentification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $.N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $12,075,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 Ist 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

‘System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans ‘The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service.

‘The system currently has approximately N/A in outstan

1g loan amount.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

AC KW

O O

D /

[Ú

Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022.

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

Blackwood Manhole

Blackwood Force Main

Blackwood Gravity Main

Wise County

Blackwood Wastewater System

Legend @ Manhole — Gravity Main == Force Main @ Blackwood Manhole

Blackwood Force Main

—— Blackwood Gravity Main

Wise County

Blackwood Wastewater System

USGS The National Map: Natiofial Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecgsystems) US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data: US, Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, US. Coastal Relief Model, Data refreshed June, 2022.

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SYSTEM - BLACKWOOD

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER

JOSEPHINE COLLECTION SYSTEM
WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Josephine collection system serves the unincorporated area of Josephine in central Wise County located to the west and adjacent to the City of Norton along SR 610. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2012.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

74 Residential Customers 3 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 77 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 96% residential and 4% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2012. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2012.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes two pump stations:

 Josephine Pump Station – 27.5 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the City of Norton Sewer System.

The system also collects flow from the City of Norton collection system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the City of Norton system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the C-N-W Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 267,600 N/A

February N/A 219,100 N/A

March N/A 280,000 N/A

April N/A 247,300 N/A

May N/A 264,500 N/A

June N/A 277,500 N/A

July N/A 310,400 N/A

August N/A 295,500 N/A

September N/A 301,400 N/A

October N/A 301,500 N/A

November N/A 277,400 N/A

December N/A 293,100 N/A

Monthly Average 0 277,942 N/A

Daily Average 0 9,265 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 120

JOSEPHINE COLLECTION SYSTEM WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Josephine collection system serves the unincorporated area of Josephine in central Wise County located to the west and adjacent to the City of Norton along SR 610. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2012.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

14 Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers

ici

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 96% residential and 4% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2012. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2012.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

‘The system includes two pump stations:

Josephine Pump Station — 27.5 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collection system. ‘The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the City of Norton Sewer System.

The system also collects flow from the City of Norton collection system(s).

Flow collected by th C-N-W Re

conveyed to the City of Norton system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the nal WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828)

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 N/A 267,600 N/A February N/A 219,100 NA March N/A 280,000 NA April N/A 247,300 N/A May NA 264,500 NA June N/A 277,500 N/A July N/A 310,400 N/A August N/A 295,500 NA September N/A 301,400 NIA October NA 301,500 NA November N/A 277.400 NA December N/A 293,100 N/A Monthly Average 0 277,942 N/A Daily Average 0 9,265 NA

Avg / Customer 0 120

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Josephine collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $12,075,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 1st 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Josephine collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A ‘were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A. were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

The system has had permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance, The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021, The CIP i next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Judes $12,075,300 of projects for completi

Sewer Rate Structure ‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 Ist 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after; Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service. The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O SE

PH IN

E /

[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500

Feet

Legend Manhole

[Ú Pump Station

Gravity Main

Force Main

[Ú Norton Pump Station

Norton Manhole

Norton Force Main

Norton Gravity Main

CNW Force Main

CNW Gravity Main

CNW Manhole

CNW Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

Blackwood Pump Station

Josephine Pump Station

Norton Wastewater System

CNW Wastewater System

Legend @ = Manhole [Pump Station —= Gravity Main ==+ Force Main Norton Pump Station @ Norton Manhole ‘+ Norton Force Main === Norton Gravity Main == CNW Force Main —= CNW Gravity Main @ CNW Manhole

\ cnw

Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

Blackwood Pump Station

Josephine Pump Station

Ne Wastewater System ‘easy

Wastewater System

Wise County Wastewater System

USGS The National Map: Natonl Boundaries Dataset PEP levation Presa, Geographic Names information system, National HyowapyDatplet, National Land Cover Database, "Navona structures Dataset and National ranspetarph Dataset; USS Global Eosjstens | US. Census Bureau IGER/Line data; USFS Road Dat! Natura Earth Oat; US. Department of state Humanitarian Information Units and NON National Centers for Environmental Information, US, Coastal Rit Model, Data refreshét une, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - JOSEPHINE

= i

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O RT

O N

AR EA

[Ú [Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

Norton Manhole

Norton Gravity Main

[Ú Wise Pump Station

Wise Manhole

Wise Gravity Main

Wise Force Main

CNW Gravity Main

CNW Manhole

Town Boundary

Wise Wastewater System

CNW Wastewater System

Norton Wastewater System

Wise County - Guest River Wastewater System

Wise Wastewater System

Wise County - Hamiltontown Wastewater System

{USGS The National Map Najora Boundaries Dataset. BDEPEleition Program, Geog Names Information Sytem National Hysrograhy Dataset, National Land Cover Data Naonal Structures Ostet, and Nations tion Dataset USGS Global Ecosystems US. Census Butea TIGER/tine data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Gat; US. Department fate Hugpnitarian Information Unt; and NOAA Naonal Centers for Eovionmental

} ‘ y int ‘ogg oastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022. | 7% 7 wy) . al Wy nd Fm f vy : ™—SS a Legend 4 * ~*~ y \ ma ‘ @ = Manhole y =) ; ~ Pn |

P — Gravity Main f Wise } <a Joe: Force main Ss Wastewater System ones Fp = © Norton Manhole — z | == Norton Gravity Main ee | Pe~ [Hl Wise Pump Station : , a 2 @ Wise Manhole ¢ y <2 w / Te? Lg Sa — Wise Gravity Main r bin Bean 258 Wise Force Main ae ws Fy oa Qua 2 > 4 2 eas — = CNW Gravity Main cd vise County Guest River Piel Sua CNW Manhole , Wastewater System ation b & E f Town Boundary ‘ us

So Sia Ti a wet 2U% 4 « a Pe ae #& fe g a fo} ‘ 35 sea g$.z te z te % fae «") ‘= =e! ERS 2 2a ad | 5 ani e ‘ ” nf Ble vy Zs CBR w P I \ ) B= ape r , ” SG e ty al ", ‘ f Wise . ph - g ‘ Wastewater System + ~ * v oT = ba | d a. f g re aN iN hay = F, : (orton i} 8 Westeater sytem Wise County - Hamitontown | = 7 Shegif = Wastewater System

aa y se Bar ? —,

= « = | (Ae = Ws) —_—— tne Wastewater System |i —— 0 4,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 } =F Se !| f a. = — xy . : ail ee

POUND WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY
LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Pound collection system serves the Town of Pound in Wise County near the State Route 23 North of the Town of Wise. The collection system was constructed in 1970s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

633 Residential Customers 34 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

667 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 20” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 60% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1995. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970s.

The system includes three pump stations:

 Main Influent Pump Station – 500 GPM submersible grinder pump station. The pump station discharges through a 10” force main that empties into a 20” gravity sewer line.

 Secondary Pump Station – 150 GPM submersible grinder pump station. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 709,000 N/A N/A

February 798,000 N/A N/A

March 695,000 N/A N/A

April 661,000 N/A N/A

May 640,000 N/A N/A

June 1,110,000 N/A N/A

July 2,075,000 1,735,900 84%

August 1,982,000 1,754,400 89%

September 1,747,000 1,427,800 82%

October 658,000 1,219,600 185%

November 893,000 1,180,400 132%

December 666,000 1,370,400 206%

Monthly Average 1,052,833 868,850 83%

Daily Average 34,613 23,804 83%

Avg / Customer 51.89 36

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Town of Pound collection system had many reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. All were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, many were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris.

POUND WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Pound collection system serves the Town of Pound in Wise County near the State Route 23 North of the Town of Wise. The collection system was constructed in 1970s.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

33 Residential Customers 34 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

a Q — Other Municipal Systems 667 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer residential,

ings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non-

The collection system consists of 4” through 20” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 60% of the system consists of terra cotta or conerete lines and approximately 50% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1995. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970s.

The system includes three pump stations:

Main Influent Pump Station ~ 500 GPM submersible grinder pump station. The pump station discharges through a 10” force main that empties into a 20” gravity sewer line.
Secondary Pump Station — 150 GPM submersible grinder pump station. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 709,000 N/A N/A February 798,000 N/A N/A Mareh 695,000 N/A N/A April 661,000 N/A N/A May 640,000 N/A N/A June 1,110,000 N/A N/A July 2,075,000 1,735,900 84% August 1,982,000 1,754,400 89% September 1,747,000 1,427,800 82% October 658,000 1,219,600 185% November 893,000 1,180,400 132% December 666,000 1,370,400 206% Monthly Average 1,052,833 868,850 83% Daily Average 34,613 23,804 83% Avg/ Customer 51.89 36

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Pound collection system had many reported sewer system overflows during calendar year

All were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, many were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris.

 The system has had 1 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of transfer of the Town of Pound NOV to Wise County Public Service Authority during consolidation for flow exceeding permitted level at WWTP.

 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated July 1, 2022. and was issued because flow at WWTP is above permitted capacity.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 I/I,  Neglected maintenance on everything.

System Needs

 Major upgrades from consolidation,  Interceptor, lift station, plant, and sub-basin collection repair.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2020. The CIP includes $30,000,000 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan currently being prepared by Wise County PSA staff.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Sewer for Well Water

$42.00 First 1500 gal $63.00 Flat

$14.00 Every 1,000 gal after

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $420,000 in outstanding loan.

The system has had | permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of transfer of the Town of Pound NOV to Wise County Public Service Authority during consolidation for flow exceeding permitted level at WWTP.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System 7M

Neglected maintenance on everything.

System Needs

Interceptor, lift station, plant, and sub-basin collection repair.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

SSES ASSES has not been performed. Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2020. The CIP includes $30,000,000 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

‘Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan currently being prepared by Wise County PSA staff. Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Sewer for Well Water, $42.00 | First 1500 gal__| $63.00 Flat $14.00 | Every 1,000 gal after

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Lo: The system currently has approximately $420,000 in outstanding loan.

WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY POUND – VPDES PERMIT # VA0061913 WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 11543 Old Mill Village Road (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1972. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1995. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Pound collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.5 MGD.
The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.053. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.719 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 363 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Pound River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Wise County Public Service Authority.
Currently, 2 full time and no part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 10 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had many permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of exceeding permitted capacity.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 All assets of the wastewater treatment plant are in need of replacement.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 The entire treatment plant needs to be replaced.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable project cost for the identified facility improvements is $3,689,600.

Improvement Cost

New pumps, VFDs, generator, ATS & controls at Upper Lift Station

$240,000

New manually cleaned bar screen $24,000

New mechanical screen, compactor, & controls $300,000

Replace three pumps & valve sets at preliminary treatment building $100,000

New grit classifier screw unit $60,000

Grit pump vault, pumps, controls & appurtenances $120,000

Aeration piping, diffusers, and valves for grit system $60,000

Blowers and controls for grit system $96,000

Repaint pretreatment room and piping to remain $25,000

Replacement doors at pretreatment building $6,000

WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY POUND — VPDES PERMIT # VA0061913

WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY

LENWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT.

Facility Description ~ The treatment facility is located at 11543 Old Mill Village Road (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1972. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1995. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

ics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Pound collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.5 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.053. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.719 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 363 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Pound River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by Wise County Public Service Authority. Currently, 2 full time and no part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 10 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had many permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of exceeding permitted capacity.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Allassets of the wastewater treatment plant are in need of replacement.

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows The entire treatment plant needs to be replaced.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable project cost for the identified facility improvements is $3,689,600.

Improvement Cost

$240,000

New pumps, VEDs, generator, ATS & controls at Upper Lift Station

‘New manually cleaned bar screen $24,000

New mechanical screen, compactor, & controls $300,000

Replace three pumps & valve sets at preliminary treatment building $100,000

New grit classifier serew unit $60,000

Grit pump vault, pumps, controls & appurtenances. $120,000

‘Aeration piping, diffusers, and valves for grit system $60,000

Blowers and controls for grit system $96,000

Repaint pretreatment room and piping to remain $25,000 Replacement doors at pretreatment building $6,000

Ventilation and heat replacements at pretreatment building $55,000

Blowers and controls for aeration basins $200,000

Aeration piping, diffusers and valves for aeration basins $150,000

Clarifier splitter box modification $36,000

Clarifier mechanism replacements $250,000

Waste sludge pumps, VFDs, valves and controls $45,000

Grout chlorine contact tank floor $15,000

Automatic refrigerated composite samplers $30,000

New UV system, controls, piping, & channel $330,000

Blowers and controls for aerobic digester $150,000

Digester drain line modifications $42,000

New digester pump, piping & controls $50,000

Install sludge press into building with assoc. piping & valves $25,000

New flow meters & transmitters $81,000

Demolish sludge storage building $55,000

Miscellaneous demolition $40,000

New pre-engineered metal sludge building $314,600

Replace electrical gear $110,000

Replace plant emergency generator and ATS $150,000

Electrical conduit/fittings repair or replacement $30,000

New SCADA system $200,000

New yard piping and repairs $30,000

New sidewalks and pad at dewatering building $30,000

Bypass pumping $240,000

Total $3,689,600

‘Ventilation and heat replacements at pretreatment building

$55,000

Blowers and controls for aeration basins $200,000 Aeration piping, diffusers and valves for aeration basins $150,000 Clarifier splitter box modification $36,000 Clarifier mechanism replacements $250,000 ‘Waste sludge pumps, VFDs, valves and controls $45,000 Grout chlorine contact tank floor $15,000 Automatic refrigerated composite samplers $30,000 New UV system, controls, piping, & channel $330,000 Blowers and controls for aerobic digester $150,000 Digester drain line modifications $42,000 New digester pump, piping & controls $50,000 Install sludge press into building with assoc. piping & valves $25,000 New flow meters & transmitters $81,000 Demolish sludge storage building $55,000 Miscellaneous demolition $40,000 New pre-engineered metal sludge building $314,600 Replace electrical gear $110,000 Replace plant emergency generator and ATS. $150,000 Electrical conduit/fittings repair or replacement $30,000 New SCADA system $200,000 New yard piping and repairs $30,000 New sidewalks and pad at dewatering building $30,000 Bypass pumping $240,000 Total $3,689,600

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O U

N D

TPWW

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Wise County Wastewater System

Legend TPWW WWTP

Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

Town Boundary

Legend [aj wwe

@ Manhole — Gravity Main

=> Force Main

Town Boundary

‘Wise County Wastewater System

TGs The National Maps National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Homes Informatio Stern, National Hysoglaphy Dataset, National Land Gover Database, Nasonal Structures Ostet and National Transportation Datatet; USGS Gaba fowstems USCensus Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Rapa Oats; Natural Earth Oats; U.S. Departement of Siate Humanitavian information Unt: and NORA Natonal Centers for Environmental Information, US. Coastal Relief Model. Data refs June, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - POUND

Z Ly

RODA/OSAKA/STONEGA/DERBY COLLECTION SYSTEM
WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Roda/Osaka/Stonega/Derby collection system serves these unincorporated areas located in western Wise County along SR 600, 685 and 686 approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the community of Appalachia. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2004. The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

212 Residential Customers 0 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

212 Total Number of Customers The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% residential and 0% non- residential. The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2004. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2018.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes two pump stations:

 Derby Pump Station – 105 GPM submersible pump station that receives flow from the Derby side of the collection system along SR 686. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Wise County PSA’s Sewer System.

 Roda Pump Station – 130 GPM submersible pump station that receives flow from the Roda side of the collection system along SR 685. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. The receiving sewer system is part of the Wise County PSA’s Sewer System.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Appalachia system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020940).
System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station.
A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 342,900 N/A

February N/A 358,200 N/A

March N/A 345,700 N/A

April N/A 410,300 N/A

May N/A 397,800 N/A

June N/A 494,900 N/A

July N/A 423,400 N/A

August N/A 484,400 N/A

September N/A 480,100 N/A

October N/A 363,000 N/A

November N/A 365,700 N/A

December N/A 371,400 N/A

Monthly Average 0 403,150 N/A

Daily Average 0 13,438 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 63

RODA/OSAKA/STONEGA/DERBY COLLECTION SYSTEM WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Roda/Osaka/Stonega/Derby collection system serves these unincorporated areas located in western Wise County along SR 600, 685 and 686 approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the community of Appalachia. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 2004.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

212 Residential Customers 0 — Commercial Customers a

Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 212 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 100% residential and 0% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2004, The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2018

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes two pump stations:

Derby Pump Station — 105 GPM submersible pump station that receives flow from the Derby side of the collection system along SR 686. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. ‘The receiving sewer system is part of the Wise County PSA’s Sewer System,
Roda Pump Station ~ 130 GPM submersible pump station that receives flow from the Roda side of the collection system along SR 685. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line. ‘The receiving sewer system is part of the Wise County PSAs Sewer System,

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Appalachia system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Big Stone Gap WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0020940).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 NIA 342,900 NA February NIA 358,200 NA March NIA 345,700 N/A April NIA 410,300 NA May NIA 397,800 NA June NIA 494,900 NA July NIA 423,400 NA August NIA 484,400 NA September N/A 480,100 N/A October NIA 363,000 NA November NIA 365,700 N/A December NIA 371,400 N/A Monthly Average 0 403,150 NA Daily Average 0 13,438 N/A

Avg/ Customer 0 63

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Rhoda/Osaka/Stonega/Derby collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $12,075,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 1st 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Rhoda/Osaka/Stonega/Derby collection system had @ reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris,
The system has had permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance System Needs
Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance, The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021, The CIP i next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Judes $12,075,300 of projects for completi

Sewer Rate Structure ‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 Ist 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after; Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service. The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O RT

H AP

PA LA

CH IA

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

[Ú Pump Station

Appalachia Manhole

Appalachia Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Appalachia Wastewater System

Wise County - Roda/Oska Wastewater System

Wise County - Stonega Wastewater System

Wise County - Derby Wastewater System Roda

Pump Station

Derby Pump Station

Legend @ Manhole — Gravity Main =+ Force Main (Pump Station @ Appalachia Manhole

—— Appalachia Gravity Main

Town Boundary

VIRGINIA

{USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataet, 30EP Elevation Protram Geographic Names information Stern, National Hrowaphy Dataset Naina Land Cover Databasl US. Census Bureau TIGERLie data USFS Road Oats; Natural arth Oats; U.S-Deparoment ‘of state Hdmantaan information Un: and NOAA Natonal Centers fr Enuonmental

Infomation, US. Coastal Relief Model. Data eased une, 2022,

Wise County - Roda/Oska Wastewater System

_] ise county = stonega

Wastewater System

Wise County - Derby Wastewater System

Roda

Pump Station

Derby Pump Station

‘Appalachia Wastewater System

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

APPALACHIA

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - NORTH

DEQ

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

ES T

AP PA

LA CH

IA /

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

[Ú Pump Station

[Ú Appalachia Pump Station

Appalachia Force Main

Appalachia Manhole

Appalachia Gravity Main

Big Stone Gap Gravity Main

Big Stone Gap Manhole

Big Stone Gap Force Main

Town Boundary

Appalachia Wastewater System

Wise County - Upper Exeter Wastewater System

Big Stone Gap Wastewater System

Upper Exeter Pump Station

@ Manhole

| —— Gravity Main

==> Force Main

[HI Appalachia Pump Station ==> Appalachia Force Main @ Appalachia Manhole — Appalachia Gravity Main — Big Stone Gap Gravity Main @ Big Stone Gap Manhole ‘+ Big Stone Gap Force Main

sarin National

1,000 2,000

TeFeeRSoN NATIONAL A roses

NATIONAL

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - WEST APPALACHIA

TACOMA/RIVERVIEW COLLECTION SYSTEM
WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Tacoma/Riverview collection system serves the unincorporated areas of Tacoma and Riverview located in southeastern Wise County along SR 699. The oldest portions of the collection system were constructed in 1990.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

316 Residential Customers 3 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

319 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 98% residential and 2% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1990.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

There are no pump stations within this system.

The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the C-N-W collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the C-N-W Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828).

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 700,900 N/A

February N/A 633,600 N/A

March N/A 533,400 N/A

April N/A 658,000 N/A

May N/A 631,000 N/A

June N/A 628,100 N/A

July N/A 669,200 N/A

August N/A 633,600 N/A

September N/A 687,800 N/A

October N/A 628,800 N/A

November N/A 502,800 N/A

December N/A 697,500 N/A

Monthly Average 0 633,725 N/A

Daily Average 0 21,124 N/A

Avg / Customer 0 293

TACOMA/RIVERVIEW COLLECTION SYSTEM WISE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY, LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description — The Tacoma/Riverview collection system serves the unincorporated areas of Tacoma and Riverview located in southeastern Wise County along SR 699. The oldest portions of the collection system were

constructed in 1990,

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

316 Residential Customers 3 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

319 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billing flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 98% residential and 2% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1990,

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

There are ne pump stations within this

system. ‘The system also collects flow from the N/A system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the C-N-W collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the C-N-W Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0077828)

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 NIA 700,900 NA February NIA 633,600 N/A March NIA 533,400 N/A April NIA 658,000 NA May NIA 631,000 N/A June NIA 628,100 N/A July NIA 669,200 NA August NIA 633,600 NIA September NIA 687,800 N/A October NIA 628,800 NA November NIA 502,800 N/A December NIA 697,500 N/A Monthly Average 0 633,725 NA Daily Average 0 21,124 N/A

Avg/ Customer 0 293

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Tacoma/Riverview collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 I/I in Riverview area

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $12,075,300 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 1st 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after;

Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service.

The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Tacoma/Riverview collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year

N/A were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, N/A were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of N/A.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated N/A and was issued

because N/A.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

SSES was performed on the N/A are of the system in N/A by N/A. The SSES identified $ N/A of recommended system rehabilitation projects

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021, The CIP i next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by N/A in N/A.

Judes $12,075,300 of projects for completi

Sewer Rate Structure ‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022:

Sewer w/Public Water: $42.00 Ist 1500 gallons + $14.00 every 1000 gallons after; Sewer w/Well Water Flat Fee: $63.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $TBD. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The Wise Co. PSA has a $304,690 annual sewer debt service. The system currently has approximately N/A in outstanding loan amount.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O EB

U R N

AR EA

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Wise County - Tacoma Wastewater System

CNW Wastewater System

Coeburn Wastewater System

CNW Wastewater System Wise County - Riverview

Wastewater System

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

[Ú Coeburn Pump Station

Coeburn Manhole

Coeburn Gravity Main

Coeburn Force Main

CNW Force Main

CNW Gravity Main

CNW Manhole

Town Boundary

Legend @ = Manhole — Gravity Main == Force Main ™ [ Coeburn Pump Station @ Coeburn Manhole ee Coeburn Gravity Main == Coeburn Force Main. == CNW Force Main —— CNW Gravity Main @ CNW Manhole Town Boundary

CNW Wastewater System

IRGINIA

‘Wise County ~ Tacoma Wastewater System

CNW Wastewater System

{UsgSThe National Map: National Solndares Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Progam Geogrephic Names Information Sytem, National Hyerography Dataset, National Land Cover Databar, Nasonal Structures Ostet ang WofonalTeansor Di en one US. Census Bureau TIGER/Linggdtas USF Road Data Natural Earth Dats; U.S. Depatment a "4 Gf sate Humanitaran Information Unit and NORA Natonal Centers for Environmental

Information, US. Coastal Rel Matel. ta retteshed une 2022,

Coeburn Wastewater System

Wise County - Riverview Wastewater System

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - COEBURN AREA

TOWN OF WISE LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Wise collection system serves the Town of Wise in Wise County near the State Route 23 North of the city of Norton. The collection system was constructed in the 1930s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

2,001 Residential Customers 124 Commercial Customers 54 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

2,179 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 71% residential and 29% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 30% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 10% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2022. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1930s.

The County Manor and Noble Peak area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes three pump stations:

 Hamilton Town Pump Station – 200 GPM located at 130 Hamilton Town. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

 Addington Avenue Pump Station – 140 GPM located at 121 Addington Street. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

 Sky Avenue Pump Station – 180 GPM located at 111 Lake Street. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main and empties to an 8” gravity line.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Coeburn Norton Wise Regional Collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Coeburn Norton Wise Regional (VPDES# VA0077828) Treatment Plant.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 N/A 8,072,100 N/A

February N/A 8,454,400 N/A

March N/A 8,046,800 N/A

April N/A 8,855,300 N/A

May N/A 10,071,801 N/A

June N/A 10,277,900 N/A

July N/A 9,032,000 N/A

August N/A 9,295,600 N/A

September N/A 10,316,400 N/A

October N/A 10,437,700 N/A

November N/A 9,784,900 N/A

December N/A 9,747,500 N/A

Monthly Average N/A 9,366,033

TOWN OF WISE LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Town of Wise collection system serves the Town of Wise in Wise County near the State Route 23 North of the city of Norton. The collection system was constructed in the 1930s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be: 2,001 Residential Customers 124

124 Commercial Customers

54 Industrial Customers

0 — Other Municipal Systems 2,179 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 71% residential and 29% non- residential.

The County Manor and Noble Peak area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes three pump stations:

Hamilton Town Pump Station — 200 GPM located at 130 Hamilton Town. ‘The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an &” gravity sewer line.

« Addington Avenue Pump Station — 140 GPM located at 121 Addington Street. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line

Sky Avenue Pump Station ~ 180 GPM located at 111 Lake Street. The pump station discharges through a2” force main and empties to an 8” gravity line.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Coeburn Norton Wise Regional Collection system, Treatment is ultimately provided at the Coeburn Norton Wise Regional (VPDES# VA0077828) Treatment Plant.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Accountable January 2021 NA NA February NA NA March NA 8,046,800 NA April NA 8,855,300 NA May NIA 10,071,801 NIA June NA 10,277,900 NIA July NA 9,032,000 NA August NA 9,295,600 NA September NA 10,316,400 NA October NA 10,437,700 NA November NA 9,784,900 NA December NA 9,747,500 NA

Monthly Average N/A 9,366,033

Daily Average N/A 307,924 N/A

Avg / Customer N/A 141 N/A

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Town of Wise collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
 The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Root,  Blockages,  Grease.

System Needs

 Line rehabilitation,  Pump station rehabilitation,  Manhole rehabilitation,  Infiltration & Inflow remediation,  Increased system capacity.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed.

Capital Improvements Plan

The town has a five-year capital improvement plan.

Asset Management Plan

The Town does not currently have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified July 2022.

In Town Out of Town

$17.92 First 1000 gal $26.06 First 1000 gal

$7.17 Per 1000 gal after $10.43 Per 1000 gal after

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has no outstanding loan.

Daily Average N/A 307,924 NA Avg / Customer N/A 141 NIA

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Wise collection system had reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Root,
Blockages, © Grease

System Needs

Line rehabilitation, Pump station rehabilitation, Manhole rehabilitation, Infiltration & Inflow remediation, Increased system capacity.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES ASSES has not been performed.

Capital Improvements Plan ‘The town has a five-year capital improvement plan.

Asset Management Plan

The Town does not currently have an asset management plan, Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified July 2022.

In Town Out of Town $17.92 | First 1000 gal $26.06 | First 1000 gal $7.17 | Per 1000 gal after $10.43 | Per 1000 gal after

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has no outstanding loan.

‘7 : O ‘ Hamilton Town Pump Station Legend system Pump Station @ = Manhole - '* Force Main ~Y 2 S|— Gravity Main - I=/] a aRv z oO 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

a Feet

i ) . = “ = Va >

wT f z
“8 ~ i? ¢ N =e al st cs i Ie d t - sky Avenue S = Pump Station , G wie. a, Zz —————. % ota t10 Addington Avenue Y 0 Pump Station = o dP)

| o P a ~ : veo)

USGS The National Map National Boundaries Dataset, 30EP clevatlgjrPredfam, Geographic Names Intorifietian System, National Hyevodtaphy Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Nationa Structures Dataset. anailstionalTranspitation Dataset, USGS Global Feosysterns:U.S. Census

Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; US; Department of StalsHUlanilaian informabiGmUnit; and NOAMNational Centers

for Environmettal information, US. Coastal Relief Model, Data fetreshed June, 2022. x

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF WISE

SHEET

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY P

SA W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O N

ES O

M E

PI N

E AI

R PO

RT /

0 800 1,600 2,400400

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Force Main

Wise County

N TGs The Natorl Mop Nato] Bondaves Oe, S0EP Fat Progam Geowsonic] ~ ames norman Stem atonal MyterntyDstae, Natns Lind Cover Doors

A US. Cones Buca TenAine dt Ut Row Das Natl Earth Dats 0 Depart

of State Humanitarian information Un; and NOAA Natonal Centers for Envonmental Information, US. Coastal Rl Model Data efeshed ne, 2022,

Legend

@ Manhole — Gravity Main == Force Main

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

\ ==

WISE COUNTY PSA WASTEWATER SYSTEM - LONESOME PINE AIRPORT

APPENDIX A

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS AND MAPS

APPENDIX A

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT

EXISTING SYSTEMS AND MAPS

TOWN OF ABINGDON COLLECTION SYSTEM
Town of Abingdon Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Abingdon collection system serves the customers of the Town of Abingdon located off Exits 14, 17, and 19 of I-81. The original collection system was constructed circa the 1950s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

4,420 Residential Customers 730 Commercial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 5,151 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 86% residential and 14% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 40% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 45% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1950s.

The system includes six (6) pump stations:

 Wilson Subdivision Pump Station (18255 Woodland Hills Road), Installed in 1984 o F.E. Myers Company Manufacturer o Myers WG30H Grinder Pumps, 60 Amps, 200 Volts, Generator 30 KW, Manual Start, Omni-Site

#20816, 3450 RPM, 3.5 HP, Rated 48 GPM, 77 TDH o Engineer: Draper Aden Associates, Blacksburg, Virginia,
o Contractor: (Unknown) o Force Main 2175.38’ L.F. 4” Schedule 40 PVC Pipe

 Southview Pump Station (989 Empire Drive), Installed in 1989 o Yeoman’s Chicago Corporation Manufacturer o Yeoman’s 9100, 400 Amps, 480 Volts, Generator 125 KW, Auto-Start, Omni-site #11476, w/Arc

Flash, 60 HP, 1750 RPM, Rated 347 GPM, 182 TDH o S.O. #: 266076 o Engineer: Thompson & Litton, Inc., Wise, Virginia o Contractor: Mendon Pipeline Company o Force Main 5186.73 L.F. 6” DI Pipe

 Westwood Pump Station (18326 Stonemill Road), Installed in 1992 o Yeoman’s Chicago Corporation Manufacturer o Yeoman’s 9000, 200 Amps, 460 Volts, Generator 30 KW, Manual Start, Omni-Site #21206,

w/Arc Flash, 1750 RPM, 3HP, #2 Pump Rated 201 GPM, #1 Pump Rated 204 GPM, Total Rating 152 GPM & 29 TDH

o Engineer: Draper Aden Associates, Blacksburg, Virginia o Contractor: Highland Construction Company (Abingdon, VA) & Nicar Construction (Bristol,

TN) o Force Main 79 L.F., 6” DI Pipe

 Watauga Road Pump Station (17366 Watauga Road), Installed in 1994, Standby Pump – 06/13/2012 o Davis EMU Manufacturer o Davis EMU Model FA 10.65E, 200 Amps, 240 Volts, Generator 80 KW, Auto-Start, Omni-Site

#21171, 25 HP, 1740 RPM, 240 Volts, Three Phase, Rated 260 GPM, 161 TDH o Engineer: Anderson & Associates, Blacksburg, VA o Contractor: Little “B” Enterprises, Castlewood, VA o Force Main 8,796.26 L.F., 6” C900 PVC Pipe, & 5,957 L.F., 8” C900 PVC Pipe

TOWN OF ABINGDON COLLECTION SYSTEM ‘Town of Abingdon Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Town of Abingdon collection system serves the customers of the Town of Abingdon located off Exits 14, 17, and 19 of I-81. The original collection system was constructed circa the 1950s,

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

4,420 Residential Customers 30 Commercial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 5,151 Total Number of Customers

‘The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 86% residential and 14% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 40% of the system consists of terra cotta or conerete lines and approximately 45% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1950s.

The system includes six (6) pump stations:

Wilson Subdivision Pump Station (18255 Woodland Hills Road), Installed in 1984 © F.E. Myers Company Manufacturer © Myers WG30H Grinder Pumps, 60 Amps, 200 Volts, Generator 30 KW, Manual Start, Omni-Site #20816, 3450 RPM, 3.5 HP, Rated 48 GPM, 77 TDH © Engineer: Draper Aden Associates, Blacksburg, Virginia, © Contractor: (Unknown) © Force Main 2175.38" L.F. 4” Schedule 40 PVC Pipe © Southview Pump Station (989 Empire Drive), Installed in 1989 © Yeoman’s Chicago Corporation Manufacturer © Yeoman’s 9100, 400 Amps, 480 Volts, Generator 125 KW, Auto-Start, Omni-site #11476, w/Are Flash, 60 HP, 1750 RPM, Rated 347 GPM, 182 TDH S.0. #: 266076 Engineer: Thompson & Litton, Inc., Wise, Virginia Contractor: Mendon Pipeline Company © Force Main 5186.73 L.F. 6” DI Pipe © Westwood Pump Station (18326 Stonemill Road), Installed in 1992 © Yeoman’s Chicago Corporation Manufacturer © Yeoman’s 9000, 200 Amps, 460 Volts, Generator 30 KW, Manual Start, Omni-Site #21206, w/Are Flash, 1750 RPM, 3HP, #2 Pump Rated 201 GPM, #1 Pump Rated 204 GPM, Total Rating 152 GPM & 29 TDH © Engineer: Draper Aden Associates, Blacksburg, Virginia © Contractor: Highland Construction Company (Abingdon, VA) & Nicar Construction (Bristol, TN) © Force Main 79 L-F., 6” DI Pipe © Watauga Road Pump Station (17366 Watauga Road), Installed in 1994, Standby Pump ~ 06/13/2012 o Davis EMU Manufacturer © Davis EMU Model FA 10.65E, 200 Amps, 240 Volts, Generator 80 KW, Auto-Start, Omni-Site #21171, 25 HP, 1740 RPM, 240 Volts, Three Phase, Rated 260 GPM, 161 TDH © Engineer: Anderson & Associates, Blacksburg, VA © Contractor: Little “B” Enterprises, Castlewood, VA © Force Main 8,796.26 L.F., 6” C900 PVC Pipe, & 5,957 L.F., 8” C900 PVC Pipe

200

 Meade Meadows Pump Station (24030 Berry Creek Drive), Installed in 1999 o General Signal Pump Group Manufacturer o Pumps Hydromatic S4LRC 62 HX, 230 Volts, 225 Amps, 4 Wire Delta Generator 60 KW, Auto-

Start, Rated 100 GPM, 107 TDH, 25 HP, 3450 RPM, Omni-Site #21172 o Engineer: R.D. Designs, Abingdon, VA o Contractor: Little “B” Enterprises, Castlewood, VA o Force Main 830.77 L.F., 4” PVC Pipe

 JMH Cancer Center Pump Station (26180 Lee Hwy), Installed in 2007 o F.E. Myers Company Manufacturer o Myers 4VCX, 15 HP, 1750 RPM, 208 Volts, Rated 250 GPM, 44 TDH, Generator (Genset Model

DSHA, DSHAB, DSHAC, DSHAE, and DSHAF) 125 KW, Auto-Start, Omni-Site #21162 o Engineer: Unknown o Contractor: Rentenbach Constructors, Inc. & Baker’s Construction and Excavation o Force Main 2,125.27 L.F., 6” PVC Pipe

The system also collects flow from a portion of the Washington County Service Authority sewer system at approximately (information not provided) GPD.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility (VPDES Permit #VA0026531).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Town of Abingdon collection system had 16 reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021 due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris, and lines at less than minimal slopes.

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

 I/I related overflows  Capacity issues related to I/I  Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

Month (2021) Gallons

Treated

Gallons

Billed

Percent

Accountable

January 87,040,000 15,570,000 18%

February 98,880,000 34,194,000 16%

March 130,890,000 23,284,000 26%

April 90,870,000 25,079,000 26%

May 61,470,000 28,078,000 41%

June 61,790,000 26,772,996 45%

July 62,240,000 25,115,998 43%

August 60,870,000 29,786,999 41%

September 48,600,000 29,120,000 61%

October 55,090,000 27,429,988 53%

November 49,300,000 29,235,000 56%

December 50,030,000 29,492,000 59%

Monthly Average 71,422,500 26,929,832

Daily Average 2,543,815 959,145

Avg/Customer 493.8487805 186

° °

General Signal Pump Group Manufacturer

Pumps Hydromatic S4LRC 62 HX, 230 Volts, 225 Amps, 4 Wire Delta Generator 60 KW, Auto- Start, Rated 100 GPM, 107 TDH, 25 HP, 3450 RPM, Omni-Site #21172

Engineer: R.D. Designs, Abingdon, VA

Contractor: Little “B” Enterprises, Castlewood, VA

Force Main 830.77 L-F., 4” PVC Pipe

° °

° ° °

The system also collects flow from a portion of the Washington County Servi

F.E. Myers Company Manufacturer

Myers 4VCX, 15 HP, 1750 RPM, 208 Volts, Rated 250 GPM, 44 TDH, Generator (Genset Model DSHA, DSHAB, DSHAC, DSHAE, and DSHAF) 125 KW, Auto-Start, Omni-Site #21162 Engineer: Unknown

Contractor: Rentenbach Constructors, Inc, & Baker’s Construction and Excavation

Force Main 2,125.27 L.F., 6" PVC Pipe

Authority sewer system at

approximately (information not provided) GPD.

‘Treatment is ultimately provided at the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility (VPDES Permit #VA0026531.

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as

follows:

Gallons Gallons. Percent Month(2c2il | treated | silled _|Accountabe|

Daily Average 2,543,815 959,145

|Avg/Customer 493.8487805| 186

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Abingdon collection system had 16 reported sewer system overflows during the

endar

year 2021 due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris, and lines at less than minimal slopes.

‘The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

‘© The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

Wrelated overflows
Capacity issues related to I
Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.  Line rehabilitation  Pump station rehabilitation  Manhole rehabilitation  Increased system capacity

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

One SSES was performed on the system in 2021 CHA, and further assessed by The Lane Group, Inc. CHA is currently working on a second SSES. The 2021 SSES identified a total of $9.5 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2022. The CIP includes $8,603,000 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The Town has an Asset Management Plan for a portion of the system that was completed in 2021 as part of the SSES completed by CHA

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $9,502,000.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Debt Service Sewer Fund

Schedule Maturity Dates Profile as Of 11/15/2022 Frequency Annual First Period End 11/30/2023 End Date 11/30/2040

Total Sewer Fund

Date Principal Interest Total 11/30/2023 743,142.25 1,500.67 744,642.92 11/30/2024 711,611.32 513.22 712,124.54 11/30/2025 692,949.12 692,949.12 11/30/2026 692,949.12 692,949.12 11/30/2027 394,184.31 394,184.31 11/30/2028 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2029 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2030 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2031 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2032 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2033 4,971.29 4,971.29

Total 3,716,905.41 2,013.89 3,718,919.30

System Needs

Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. Line rehabilitation

Pump station rehabilitation

Manhole rehabilitation

Increased system capacity

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

‘One SSES was performed on the system in 2021 CHA, and further assessed by The Lane Group, Inc. CHA is currently working on a second SSES. The 2021 SSES identified a total of $9.5 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2022. The CIP includes $8,603,000 of projects for compl: next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The Town has an Asset Management Plan for a portion of the system that was completed in 2021 as part of the SSES completed by CHA

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $9,502,000.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Debt Service

Sewer Fund ‘Schedule Maturity Dates Profile as Of 11/15/2022 Frequency ‘Annual First Period End 7173012023 End Date 71/30/2040 Total ‘Sewer Fund 11/30/2023 743,142.25 1,500.67 744,642.92 11/30/2024 711,611.32 513.22 712,124.54 11/90/2025 692,949.12 692,949.12, 11/30/2026 692,949.12 692,949.12 11/30/2027 394,184.31 304,184.31 11/30/2028 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2029 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2030 95,419.60 95,419.60 44/30/2031 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2032 95,419.60 95,419.60 11/30/2033 4,971.29 4,971.29

Total 3,716,905.41 2,013.89) 3,718,919.30

Table 4.1 ~ Phase I Opinion of Probable Cost

Table 4.2 — Phase I Opinion of Probable Cost

#| Work Description Quantity | Units Unit Cost 1| Bonds, Mobilization, and Insurance “ of Constr: s__138,800 | $ 138,800 2_| Watertight Frame & Cover N 1,000 | s 25,000 3| Reseal Existing Frame 16 EA | S$ 750 |s 12,000. 4| Raise to Grade <12" Total Height 1 EA | $s soo | s 900 3_| Cementitious Lining of Manhole 230 ViF | S$ 200 | s 46,000. 6 | seal Chimney with Cementitious Liner 2 EA | s 200 | s 4,400 7_| Repair Cracks and Holes 1 EA | S$ 400 | s 400 8| install Bench 15 EA | s 2700 | 's 40,500 9 | Repair Existing Bench i EA | S$ 1500 | 16,500. 10 | Seal Pipe Connections 56 EA | $ 100 | _s 5,600 11 | 4-Foot Diameter Manhole Base 3 EA | s__10.000 | _s 30,000.

12 | 4-Foot Diameter Manhole Section 14 Vir |$ S

13 | Preliminary Cleaning and CCTV LF | s 4}s 105,600 14 | 8" Lining ur | s 4s|s 479,300 15 | 8" Bursting (includes 6" to 8" burstin; 14.796. ur | s iso | s 2.219.400 16 | 10" Bursting 215 ur|_s 17s |_s 57.700 17 | 12" Bursting 197 ur | s 200 | s 39.400 18 | 10" Lining 333 ur | s so|s 16,700 19 12" Lining 197 ur| ss|is 10,900 20 | internal Point Repair 4 EA | $ 3,000 | s 12,000 External Point Repair (Pavement), 17 EA| $ 7500 |_s 126,000 External Point Repair (Yard) 4 EA | $s 5500 |_s 23.100 23 | trim Intruding Lateral 46 EA | s 230 |_s 10,600. 24 | Reconnect PVC Lateral (Pavement) 125 EA | S$ 2250 | s 281,300 25 | Reconnect PVC lateral (Yard) 14 EA | s 1750 | $ 24.400 26 | Replace Lateral to Sewer Line (Up to 20 feet) (Pavement) 209 EA | s 5,000 |_s 1,044,000 27 | Replace Lateral to Sewer Line (Up to 20 feet) (Yard) 2B EA | s 3,000 | s 69,600. ‘Total Construction Cost |$__4,763,000 Engineering - Basic of Constr. |10% - 5 476,300 Engineering - GIS Updates 1 ts| s 15,000 | s 15,000, Inspection Services 4,000. HRs | s 1o0 | s 400,000 Contingene Yo ot Constr. | 10% - S 176,300. Survey - as Required 1 us| s__s0.000 | -s 50,000 Total Opinion of Probable Cost|_S_6,188,000.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F AB

IN G

D O

N W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

AS T

AR EA

/[Ú

TPWW

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

[Ú WCSA Pump Station

WCSA Manhole

WCSA Gravity Main

WCSA Force Main

Town Boundary USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022.

Town of Abingdon Wastewater System

Westwood Pump Station

Meade Meadows Pump Station

Watauga Pump Station

JMH Cancer Pump Station

Southview Pump Station

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

Westwood Pump Station

Meade Meadows Pump Station

ca Wastewater System

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

‘Town of Abingdon

Southview Pump Station

Legend

©) Pump Station e@ Manhole

‘=> Force Main

— Gravity Main

WCSA Manhole —— WCSA Gravity Main =» WCSA Force Main Town Boundary

Tl WCSA Pump Station

{MH Cancer Pump Station

Watauga Pump Station

USGS The Notional Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3OKP FleatGh Program, Geographic Names information System, National Mysrograpty Dataset, National nd Cover Database, natonal Stuctures Osage ational Tanspertation Dataset: USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Une data USS Road ata Natural Earth Data US. Deparment of tate Humanitarian Information Uni and. NOAA National Centers for Enionmental Information, US. Coat! Rllet Model ata refterhed June, 2022,

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SYSTEM

EAST AREA

TOWN OF ABINGDON WASTEWATER

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F AB

IN G

D O

N W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

ES T

AR EA

[Ú

TPWW

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

TPWW WWTP

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

WCSA Manhole

WCSA Gravity Main

WCSA Force Main

Town Boundary

Town of Abingdon Wastewater System

Wilson Pump Station

Westwood Pump Station

Wolfe Creek Reclamation Facility

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

Wilson Pump Station

Legend

wwe

@ WCSA

==° WCSA

| Pump Station

@ Manhole ‘= Force Main — Gravity Main

—= WCSA Gravity Main

‘| Town Boundary

Manhole

Force Main

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

“Town of Abingdon Wastewater System

6,000

8,000 Feet

Pump Station

Reclamation Facility

USGS The Notional Maps Natlonal Boundaries Dataset, 3OEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names information Sytem, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Navona structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecooatms, US. Ceneue Butesu TIGER/Lne dat USS Road (ata Natural Earth Data U.S. Dapariment of state Humanitaran Information Unis and NORA National Centers for Enonmentalifermation, US. Coastal Reet Model Ostarefeshedne, 2022 ne

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF ABINGDON WASTEWATER SYSTEM

WEST AREA

WOLF CREEK WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY VPDES PERMIT #VA0026531 TOWN OF ABINGDON Mount Rogers PDC

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located along Wolf Creek in the Town of Abingdon, Virginia, just off State Route 75 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1978. The last major upgrade/expansion to the WWTP was made in 2011. The facility utilizes aerobic digestion as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Abingdon and a small portion of Washington County collection systems. The facility receives and treats approximately 60,000 gallons of septage per month. The permitted capacity of the facility is 4.95 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during the calendar year 2021 was 2,543,815 GPD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during the calendar year 2021 was 3,602,697. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 23 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Wolf Creek, a tributary to the South Holston Reservoir. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a local landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Abingdon. Currently, 15 full-time at the facility. The facility is required to be staffed 10 hours/day, Monday through Friday, and 8 hours/day on Saturday and Sunday.

Permit Violations – The facility has had zero (0) permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 #2 Grit collector has an issue with the collection buckets; a trash pump is needed to pump down the area.

 The aeration dissolved oxygen controllers are sun damaged. All but two (2) of the controllers cannot be read if calibrated. The two (2) that currently work are used for controlling the blowers through a setpoint to maintain the dissolved oxygen levels necessary for properly treating the wastewater.

 One of the aeration blowers causes the main breaker to trip out.  The centrifuges used to dewater the sludge have two polymer pumps, but only one (1)

works on each unit.  Both of the centrifuges go down frequently. Electricians have been in the plant to

evaluate and troubleshoot the issues. There is old wiring, outdated electrical panels and monitors, and bypass wiring to override certain operational issues. Additionally, there are many mechanical issues with the centrifuges, particularly the motor and bearings.

 Continuous problems with the ultraviolet light disinfection system. The technician has been to the plant to evaluate the issues and helped with some repairs. His verbal assessment of the system is that it has exceeded its life expectancy, and some components are now obsolete.

 The VFD at the EQ basin is inoperable.  The digester feed pump gearbox is out of service. It does not pump properly.  Several pumps and motors throughout the plant are worn out or inoperable.  Generators at Westwood and Wilson pump stations need to be replaced. Both generators

are inoperable.

WOLF CREEK WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY

VPDES PERMIT #VA0026531 TOWN OF ABINGDON Mount Rogers PDC

Facility Description ~The treatment facility is located along Wolf Creek in the Town of Abingdon, Virginia, just off State Route 75 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1978, The last major upgrade/expansion to the WWTP was made in 2011. The facility Utilizes aerobic digestion as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Abingdon and a small portion of Washington County collection systems. The facility receives and treats approximately 60,000 gallons of septage per month. The permitted capacity of the facility is 4.95 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during the calendar year 2021 was 2,543,815 GPD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during the calendar year 2021 was 3,602,697. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 23 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is, discharged to Wolf Creek, a tributary to the South Holston Reservoir, Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a local landfill.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Abingdon, Currently, 15 full-time at the facility. The facility is required to be staffed 10 hours/day, Monday through Friday, and 8 hours/day on Saturday and Sunday.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had zero (0) permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

#2.Grit collector has an issue with the collection buckets; a trash pump is needed to pump down the area.

The aeration dissolved oxygen controllers are sun damaged. All but two (2) of the controllers cannot be read if calibrated. The two (2) that currently work are used for controlling the blowers through a setpoint to maintain the dissolved oxygen levels necessary for properly treating the wastewater.
One of the aeration blowers causes the main breaker to trip out.

The centrifuges used to dewater the sludge have two polymer pumps, but only one (1) works on each unit,

Both of the centrifuges go down frequently. Electricians have been in the plant to evaluate and troubleshoot the issues. There is old wiring, outdated electrical panels and monitors, and bypass wiring to override certain operational issues. Additionally, there are many mechanical issues with the centrifuges, particularly the motor and bearings.
Continuous problems with the ultraviolet light disinfection system. ‘The technician has

been to the plant to evaluate the issues and helped with some repairs. His verbal

assessment of the system is that it has exceeded its life expectancy, and some components are now obsolete.

The VED at the EQ basin is inoperable.

The digester feed pump gearbox is out of service. It does not pump properly.

Several pumps and motors throughout the plant are worn out or inoperable.

Generators at Westwood and Wilson pump stations need to be replaced. Both generators

are inoperable.

 The primary sludge tank leaks and needs repair or replacement.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 See above. A PER is currently being drafted by The Lane Group, Inc.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is currently being assessed in a PER by The Lane Group, Inc.

The primary sludge tank leaks and needs repair or replacement.

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

See above. A PER is currently being drafted by The Lane Group, Ine.

inion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is currently being assessed in a PER by The Lane Group, Inc.

BVU AUTHORITY COLLECTION SYSTEM
BVU Authority Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The BVU Authority collection system serves the customers of the City of Bristol, Virginia. located off Exits 1, 3, 5, and 7 of I-81. The original collection system was constructed circa the 1950s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

6,840 Residential Customers 1,060 Commercial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 7,900 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 48% residential and 52% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 36” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 40% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 45% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1950s.

There are two (2) pump stations in the BVU Authority’s system:

• Information not provided by BVU Authority

The system also collects flow from a portion of the Washington County Service Authority sewer system. BVU Authority did not provide the flow amount.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP (NPDES Permit #TN0023531).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

- BVU Authority did not provide the 2021 gallons of wastewater treated.

Month (2021) Gallons

Treated

Gallons

Billed

Percent

Accountable

January 60,030,500

February 60,085,700

March 57,443,200

April 60,498,100

May 58,031,300

June 59,302,700

July 57,730,100

August 56,757,000

September 77,906,600

October 62,085,300

November 63,626,200

December 66,379,000

Monthly Average 61,656,308

Daily Average 2,195,978

Avg/Customer 278

BVU AUTHORITY COLLECTION SYSTEM BVU Authority Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The BVU Authority collection system serves the customers of the City of Bristol, Virginia. located off Exits 1, 3, 5,and 7 of 81. The original collection system was constructed circa the 1950s.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

6,840 Residential Customers 1,060 Commercial Customers

0 Other Municipal Systems 7,900 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 48% residential and 52% non-residential

There are two (2) pump stations in the BVU Authority’s system:

Information not provided by BVU Authority

The system also collects flow from a portion of the Washington County Service Authority sewer system, BVU Authority did not provide the flow amount.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP (NPDES Permit #1N0023531),

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows

Gallons Gallons Percent Month(202t) "| tveated_| Billed _[Accountable| anuary = N/A 60,030,500 February 60,085,700. [March 57,443,200. [April 60,498, 100 [May 58,031,300 June 59,302,700 July 57,730,100 |August 56,757,000 [September 77,906,600 [October 62,085,300. [November 63,626,200 [December 66,379,000 Monthly Average 61,656,308 Daily Average 2,195,978 |Avg/Customer 278

- BVU Authority did not provide the 2021 gallons of wastewater treated.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The BVU Authority collection system had 3 reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021 due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris, and lines at less than minimal slopes.

• The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is under a consent order with the DEQ, effective February 8, 2019.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

• I/I related overflows • Capacity issues related to I/I • Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance
• Grease deposits

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. • Line rehabilitation • Pump station rehabilitation • Manhole rehabilitation • Increased system capacity

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

There have been three (3) SSESs performed on the system; one (1) by Mattern & Craig prior to 2018, and two (2) by The Lane Group, Inc. (one in 2020 and one in 2022). The Lane Group, Inc. is currently working on a fourth SSES for a portion of the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed. The 2020 and 2022 SSESs identified a total of $14.79 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $46,950,000 of projects for completion in the next 6 years.

Asset Management Plan

The BVU Authority has an Asset Management Plan for the BC-1568 sub-basin of the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed that was completed in 2022 as part of the SSES completed by The Lane Group, Inc.

Project Name Water/Sewer Year

No. of

New

Conn.

Est. L.F. Pressure Zone/Sewer

Shed Benefited Reason for Project

Estimated

Total Cost

Little Creek Sewer System Improvements Sewer 2022 0 4,500 Little Creek Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 3,800,000$

Beaver Creek Interceptor EQ Basin Sewer 2024 0 1,800 Beaver Creek Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 7,300,000$

BC-782 Phase 1 Interceptor Improvements Sewer 2023 0 18,800 Beaver Creek Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 9,500,000$

Sinking Creek Sewer System Improvements Sewer 2023 0 25,650 Sinking Creek Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 2,550,000$

Gate City Highway Sewer System Improvements Sewer 2024 0 15,000 Gate City Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 1,500,000$

BC-1568 Subbasin Sewer Improvements Sewer 2025 0 15,000 Beaver Creek Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 5,300,000$

BC-1301 SSES & Sewer System Improvements Sewer 2026 0 8,000 Beaver Creek Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 2,000,000$

Beaver Creek Interceptor - Phase 2 Improvements Sewer 2028 0 3,600 Beaver Creek Sewer Shed Aged Lines, SSOs, & Capacity 15,000,000$

BVU Authority - Capital Improvement Plan

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The BVU Authority collection system had 3 reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021 due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris, and lines at less than minimal slopes,
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

Virelated overflows Capacity issues related to I/L

Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

Grease deposits

System Needs

Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. Line rehabilitation

Pump station rehabilitation

Increased system capacity

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines. Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

‘There have been three (3) SSESs performed on the system; one (1) by Mattern & Craig prior to 2018, and two (2) by The Lane Group, Inc. (one in 2020 and one in 2022). The Lane Group, Inc. is currently working on a fourth SSES fora portion of the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed. The 2020 and 2022 SSESs identified a total of $14.79 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2021. The CIP includes $46,950,000 of projects for completion in the next 6 years.

Asset Management Plan

The BVU Authority has an Asset Management Plan for the BC-1568 sub-basin of the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed that was completed in 2022 as part of the SSES completed by The Lane Group, Inc.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Residential – Inside City Residential – Outside City $17.14 Customer Charge, Min. Bill $25.71 Customer Charge, Min. Bill
$3.86 per 1,000 Gallons Usage $5.78 per 1,000 Gallons Usage

Non-Residential – Inside City Non-Residential – Outside City

$38.61 Customer Charge, Min. Bill $57.92 Customer Charge, Min. Bill $3.40 per 1,000 Gallons Usage $5.09 per 1,000 Gallons Usage

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is approximately $14,790,000.

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Information not provided by BVU Authority.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Residential Inside City Residential - Outside City

$17.14 Customer Charge, Min. Bill $25.71 Customer Charge, Min. Bill $3.86 per 1,000 Gallons Usage $5.78 per 1,000 Gallons Usage ‘Non-Residential ~ Inside City Non-Residential — Outside City $38.61 Customer Charge, Min. Bill $57.92 Customer Charge, Min. Bill $3.40 per 1,000 Gallons Usage $5.09 per 1,000 Gallons Usage

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is approximately $14,790,000.

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans Information not provided by BVU Authority.

BC-782 Improvements

Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Overall Costs

Water-Tight Frame & Cover 78 EA $ 750 $ 58,500

Cementitious Lining in Manholes (GeoKrete) 1,460 VF $ 275 $ 401,500

10"-18"" Joint Repair - Grout 1,400 EA $ 250 $ 350,000

24" DIP Joint Repair - Grout 275 EA $ 275 $ 75,625

30" RCP Joint Repair - Grout 1,750 EA $ 400 $ 700,000

36" RCP Joint Repair - Grout 350 EA $ 500 $ 175,000

UV CIPP Lining (12" CP) 3,500 LF $ 75 $ 262,500

UV CIPP Lining (18" CP) 2,999 LF $ 125 $ 374,875

UV CIPP Lining (24" CP) 1,480 LF $ 170 $ 251,600

UV CIPP Lining (30" CP) 12,790 LF $ 225 $ 2,877,750

UV CIPP Lining (36" CP) 3,400 LF $ 300 $ 1,020,000

Liner End Seal 200 EA $ 750 $ 150,000

Service Lateral Reconnections 60 EA $ 3,000 $ 180,000

Service Lateral 4" Line Replacement 2,000 LF $ 65 $ 130,000

I/I Boal Insert 100 EA $ 175 $ 17,500

Bypass Pumping 1 LS $ 250,000 $ 250,000

Bonds, Mobilization, & Insurance (@ 5.00%) 1 LS $ 373,800 $ 373,800

$ 7,648,650

Contingency 10% % of Const. - $ 764,900

Basic Engineering 7.0% % of Const. - $ 535,406

Additional Engineering Services (Surveying & GIS Updates) 1% % of Const. - $ 89,894

CCTV Line Assessment 21,000 LF $ 7 $ 150,000

Inspection 3,510 hours $ 65 $ 228,150

Lane & Right-of-way 1 Each $ 25,000 $ 25,000

Legal, Fiscal, & Administrative 1% % of Const. - $ 90,000

Total Non-Construction Cost $ 1,883,350

Total Phase I Opinion of Probable Project Cost $ 9,532,000

TABLE 4.1: OPINION OF PROBABLE COST PHASE I

Option 1 - Full Interceptor Rehabilitation

Full Interceptor Rehabilitation Construction Cost

BC-782 Improvements

‘TABLE 4.1: OPINION OF PROBABLE COST PHASE |

Dasoton a Unikom [Overall cots [Onion tFanerceptorRehabiiation wate akc Frame cover a zm z was 35500 cementitious ning in Manhole Teatro) 1460 v $ as 7.00 for" in Repsir- Grout 1400 eR $ aol 350,00 Bor ACP oin Repair Grout 1750 ry $ soo $ 70.00 lovee ning 2") 3500 7 $ 75S 262500 fovcre nine aa" cry 1480 7 $ wos 254.600 favare ning as" cry 3.400 7 $ soo § 1020909 SeviettwatReconnetons a ry $300] § 120909 Service atwral 4 tne Replace 2.000 7 ¢ es 730,00 in oat inser 100 rn ¢ Tan 17300 Bass Purine 1 $000] & 250,00 Bonds: Mobia ton A muraneeT@ SORT F is $_sna00| # 373.300 Falntercptor ehailtatin Consraion Cost § 74.650 eoningmey To of const = $ 764309 basic gnesring 0% ol const = 535.06 adi onel ngneing Svcs Gurveing & GS Update 1% of Const § 35858 ect tne Assessment 7,000 7 Te 750.00 Irapecion 3510 Tous [5 ws 728.59 anes hettotway z tach [3 200] 25,000 Teta Non Contrecton oA 5 703.350 Total Phase Opinion of Probable Project Cost 3 353200

BC-1568 Improvements

Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Overall Costs

12" Pipe Bursting (includes 8" to 12" bursting with materials) 4,385 LF $ 175 $767,375

8" CIPP (UV Cure) 3,825 LF $ 65 $248,625

12" CIPP (UV Cure) 591 LF $ 85 $50,235

15" CIPP (UV Cure) 360 LF $ 115 $41,400

18" CIPP (UV Cure) 1,174 LF $ 150 $176,100

Liner End Seals 88 EA $ 750 $66,000

8-inch DSR-35 Gravity Sewer (located in road), in-place/complete 4,350 LF $ 275 $1,196,250

Manhole Rehabilitation (GeoPolymer Coating) 923 VF $ 425 $392,275

Manhole replacement with water-tight frame and cover, in-place /complete 14 EA $ 14,000 $196,000

Reconnect to existing 8" sewer to new manhole 88 EA $ 1,800 $158,400

Lateral Replacement 1,500 LF $ 85 $127,500

Lateral Reconnection 100 EA $ 3,000 $300,000

Stream Crossing with concrete encasement 150 LF $ 400 $60,000

Replace Frame and Cover 10 EA $ 1,000 $10,000

I/I Bowl Insert 44 EA $ 200 $8,800

Bypass Pumping 1 LS $ 100,000 $100,000

Bonds, Mobilization, & Insurance (@5.00%) 1 LS $ 194,948 $194,948

$4,093,908

Contingency 10% $409,391

Basic Engineering 10.0% $409,391

Additional Services 2% $90,976

Inspection 2400 hours $70 $168,000

Legal, Fiscal, & Administrative 2% $81,878

$1,159,635

$5,253,543

TABLE 4.1 - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

Total Construction Cost

Subtotal Related Cost

Total Opinion of Probable Project Cost

BC-1568 Improvements PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

TABLE 4.1- OPINION OF PROBABLE COS’

Description Quantity [units [unit cost | Overall Costs 12" Pipe Bursting (includes 8” to 12" bursting with materials) aaas | or [s 17s| $767,375 fs" cipp (uv Cure) 3a | ou [s$ 65[ $248,625] 12" CIPP (UV Cure) 591 ues 85 $50,235 5" ciPP (UV Cure) 360 “ [s 115 $41,400 18" CIPP (UV Cure) aim [ur [s aso| $176,100] Liner End Seals 88 cas 750 $66,000 ls-inch DSR-35 Gravity Sewer (located in road), in-place/complete aaso | ou [$s 275|__ $1,196,250] Manhole Rehabilitation (GeoPolymer Coating) 923 ves 425[ $392,275] Manhole replacement with water-tight frame and cover, in-place /complete 14 ta_[s 14 000| $196,000 Reconnect to existing 8" sewer to new manhole 88 ca_[s 1800] $158,400 Lateral Replacement isoo | us as[ 127,509] Lateral Reconnection 100 ta_[s 3,000| $300,000 [stream Crossing with concrete encasement 150 us 400 $60,000 Replace Frame and Cover 10 ca [$1,000 $10,000 I Bowl Insert aa ca ([s 200 $8,809] Bypass Pumping Hl ts__[$ _ 100,000[ $100,000] Bonds, Mobilization, & Insurance (@5.00%) 1 is__[s _1949a8[ $194,928] Total Construction Cost| $4,093,908

[contingency 10% $409,391 Basic Engineering 10.0% $409,391 [Additional Services 2% $90,976 Inspection 2400 | “hours $70 $168,000 Legal, Fiscal, & Administrative 2% $81,878 ‘Subtotal Related Cost] $1,159,635]

Total Opinion of Probable Project Cost] $5,253,543]

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

BR IS

TO L

VI R G

IN IA

U TI

LI TY

A U

TH O

R IT

Y W

AS TE

W AT

ER S

TY EM

ST A

R EA

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend

[Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

[Ú WCSA Pump Station

WCSA Manhole

WCSA Gravity Main

WCSA Force Main

City Boundary

City of Bristol Wastewater System

Garden Lane Pump Station

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

Washington County Service Authority 5 Wastewater System

ity of Bristol aay Wastewater System *

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Washington County

ern f See

Legend

BRISTOL VIRGINIA UTILITY AUTHORITY WASTEWATER STYEM

EAST AREA

[Pump Station Manhole

= Force Main | —— Gravity Main [EE WCSA Pump Station © —WCSA Manhole —— WCSA Gravity Main == WCSA Force Main

City Boundary

Census Bureau TIGER/ne det; NORA

etal Information, US Coastal Rel Model Data refreshed une, 2022

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

BR IS

TO L

VI R G

IN IA

U TI

LI TY

A U

TH O

R IT

Y W

AS TE

W AT

ER S

TY EM

O RT

H A

R EA

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

¯ Legend

[Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

[Ú WCSA Pump Station

WCSA Manhole

WCSA Gravity Main

WCSA Force Main

City Boundary

City of Bristol Wastewater System

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

‘Ce

Legend

[Pump Station @ = Manhole |= Force Main

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

|——= Gravity Main

, oni eee <S

[El WCSA Pump Station

@ ~=WCSA Manhole —— WCSA Gravity Main ==* WCSA Force Main : 77> City Boundary

City of Bristol Wastewater System

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Washington County ° Service Authority Wastewater System

BRISTOL VIRGINIA UTILITY AUTHORITY WASTEWATER STYEM

NORTH AREA

Washington County Service Authority Wastewater System

ely Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National stucwres | [ETT PSST

ast; USGS Global Ecositems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Une data: Fem

Department of State Humantarin Information Uni and NOAA| =

Natural Earth Data

. Nanonal dee fr Environmental

on, US, Coastal Revel. ata retreshed ane 2022 Tne

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

BR IS

TO L

VI R G

IN IA

U TI

LI TY

A U

TH O

R IT

Y W

AS TE

W AT

ER S

TY EM

ES T

AR EA

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

¯ Legend

[Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

City Boundary

City of Bristol Wastewater System

Garden Lane Pump Station

Island Road Pump Station

Legend Se ™—SS

[Pump Station © Manhole ==> Force Main

— Gravity Main

=> City Boundary

Garden Lane Pump Station

City of Bristol

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Island Road Pump Station

BRISTOL VIRGINIA UTILITY AUTHORITY

WEST AREA

WASTEWATER STYEM

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

FANCY GAP COLLECTION SYSTEM
CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Fancy Gap collection system serves the unincorporated community of Fancy Gap located near the I-77 Exit 8 interchange and the Route 52/ Blue Ridge Parkway interchange. The collection system was constructed in 2013.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

29 Residential Customers 47 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

76 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 10% residential and 90% non- residential.

The collection system consists entirely of 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The entire system was constructed in 2013.

None of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes three pump stations:

• Route 52 Pump Station – 23 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of Route 52/ Blue Ridge Parkway intersection. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line north of the Parkway.

• Frog Spur Pump Station – 40 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the Route 52/ Blue Ridge Parkway intersection. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along Route 52.

• Reedside Pump Station – 200 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near the Carroll County Industrial Park at I-77 Exit 14. The receiving sewer system is part of the Carroll County PSA’s Gladeville/ Cranberry Sewer System.

The system does not collect flow from any other system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the CCPSA’s Gladeville/Cranberry system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the City of Galax WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0078484).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the Reedside pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 186,480 176,500 94.6% February 294,360 267,000 90.7% March 292,680 220,500 75.3% April 250,920 311,000 123.9% May 288,900 334,000 115.6% June 437,200 365,600 83.6% July 283,600 340,700 120.1% August 310,800 407,000 131.0% September 317,760 324,200 102.0%

FANCY GAP COLLECTION SYSTEM CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Fancy Gap collection system serves the unincorporated community of Fancy Gap located near the I-77 Exit 8 interchange and the Route 52/ Blue Ridge Parkway interchange. The collection system ‘was constructed in 2013.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

29 Residential Customers 47 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 1

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers.

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 10% residential and 90% non- residential.

None of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. ‘The system includes three pump stations:

Route $2 Pump Station ~ 23 GrM submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of Route 52: Blue Ridge Parkway intersection, The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that em an 8 gravity sewer line north of the Parkway.

«Frog Spur Pump Station ~ 40 GeM submersible grinder pump station serving the north side of the Route 52/ Blue Ridge Parkway intersection. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along Route 52.

Reedside Pump Station ~ 200 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near the Carroll County Industrial Park at I-77 Exit 14. The receiving sewer system is part of the Carroll County PSA’s Gladeville/ Cranberry Sewer System.

The system does not collect flow from any other system(s). Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the CCPSA’s Gladeville/Cranberry system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the City of Galax WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0078484).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon pump run times for the Reedside pump station, A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 186,480 176,500 94.6% February 294,360 267,000 90.7% March 292,680 220,500 75.3% Apri 250,920 311,000 123.9% May 288,900 334,000 115.6% June 437,200 365,600 83.6% July 283,600 340,700 120.1% August 310,800 407,000 131.0%

September 317,760 324,200 102.0%

October 259,800 304,500 117.2% November 288,960 255,600 88.5% December 208,200 185,900 89.3% Monthly Average 284,972 291,042 102.1% Daily Average 9,369 9,568 102.1% Avg / Customer 123 126

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Fancy Gap collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
• The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

An SSES Report has not been completed for the system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on July 15, 2021:

Residential Sewer Commercial Sewer

First 1,000 Gallons @ $24.20 Minimum First 2,000 Gallons @ $67.21 Minimum

All Over 1,000 Gallons @ $11.00 per 1,000 Gallons All Over 2,000 Gallons @ $9.50 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $N/A___. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $1,726,654 in outstanding loan.

October 259,800 304,500 117.2%

November 288,960 255,600 88.5% December 208,200 185,900 89.3% Monthly Average 284,972 291,042 102.1% Daily Average 9,369 9,568 102.1% Avg / Customer 123 126

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Fancy Gap collection system had (reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
The system has had_0 permit violations over the past 2 years. © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

‘+ Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance yystem Needs

Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance do. as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

\ddress private side issues such

An SSES Report has not been completed for the system. Capital Improvements Plan The system currently does not have an adopted CIP. Asset Management Plan ‘The system does not have an asset management plan, Sewer Rate Structure ‘The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on_July 15, 2021: Residential Sewer Commercial Sewer First 1,000 Gallons @ $24.20 Minimum First 2,000 Gallons @ $67.21 Minimum All Over 1,000 Gallons @ $11.00 per 1,000 Gallons All Over 2,000 Gallons @ $9.50 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified

system improvements is $_N/A . (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $1,726,654 in outstanding loan.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

CA R R O

LL C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

F AN

CY G

AP AR

EA /

[Ú[Ú

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Carroll County Wastewater System

Reedside Pump Station

Frog Spur Pump Station

Route 52 Pump Station

Force Main to Exit 14

Legend

Pump Station =» Force Main @ Manhole

—= Gravity Main

VIRGINIA

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 ee fect

Force Main to Exit 14

Carroll County 4

Wastewater System

‘USGS Te National Map Natal Boundaries Dataset, S0EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, Nationa) Hyerography Oataset, National Land Cover Database, National Stroctures Dataeet, and Natal Transportation Date, USGS Global Ecosystems US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Roaé Ont; Natiral Earth Data; US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Units Wad NOAA National Centers fr Environmental Information, US. {Coast Rte Model. Data reese lune, 2022,

Reedside Pump Station

Frog Spur Pump Station

Route 52

a Purp Station

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CARROLL COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - FANCY GAP AREA

Z K

GLADEVILLE/ CRANBERRY COLLECTION SYSTEM
CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Gladeville/Cranberry collection system serves the unincorporated communities of Gladeville and Woodlawn along the greater Route 58 corridor from the Galax city limits east to the I-77 Exit 14 interchange. The collection system was constructed in 1997.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

889 Residential Customers 69 Commercial Customers 4 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems

962 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 92% residential and 8% non- residential.

The collection system consists of _8” through 15” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1985.

None of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes seven pump stations:

• I-77 Exit 14 Pump Station – 200 GPM suction lift pump station serving the Exit 14 interchange area. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line flowing toward Woodlawn. This pump station also has a backup force main connection to the Hillsville system.

• Industrial Park Pump Station – 75 GPM suction lift pump station serving a portion of the Carroll County Industrial Park. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line flowing to the I-77 Exit 14 pump station.

• DLB Pump Station – 22 GPM grinder pump station serving a portion of Expansion Drive. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into the Industrial Park pump station.

• Airport Road Pump Station – 340 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving Wildwood Corporate Park and the I-77 Exit 19 interchange. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into a 10” gravity sewer line that flows to Woodlawn.

• Woodlawn Pump Station – 440 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving the Woodlawn community and receives pumped flow from the Airport Road and Exit 14 pumpstations. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into a 10” gravity sewer line flowing to the Crooked Creek pump station. The Woodlawn pump station has a 100,000 flow equalization tank system.

• Crooked Creek Pump Station – 510 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving the Route 58 corridor near Crooked Creek. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into a 12” gravity sewer line that flows to the Hills Pump Station.

• Hills Pump Station – 620 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving the Glendale Road area. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into a 12” gravity sewer line flowing to the Gladeville Pump Station.

• Gladeville Pump Station – 730 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving the Gladeville community and Cranberry Road area. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into the City of Galax’s sewer system.

The system also collects flow from the Fancy Gap system.

GLADEVILLE/ CRANBERRY COLLECTION SYSTEM CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Gladeville/Cranberry collection system serves the unincorporated communities of Gladeville and Woodlawn along the greater Route 58 corridor from the Galax city limits east to the I-77 Exit 14 interchange. The collection system was constructed in 1997.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

889 Residential Customers

69 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers Other Municipal Systems

32 Total Number of Customers

Sicis

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 92% residential and 8% non- residential.

The collection system consists of _8” through _15” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2020. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1985,

None of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. The system includes seven pump stations

1-77 Exit 14 Pump Station — 200 GpM suction lift pump station serving the Exit 14 interchange area. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line flowing toward Woodlawn. This pump station also has a backup foree main connection to the Hillsville system.

© Industrial Park Pump Station — 75 GPM suction lift pump station serving a portion of the Carroll County Industrial Park. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line flowing to the I-77 Exit 14 pump station,

DLB Pump Station ~ 22 GpM grinder pump station serving a portion of Expansion Drive. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into the Industrial Park pump station,

ort Road Pump Station — 340 GM suction lift sewage pump station serving Wildwood Corporate Park and the I-77 Exit 19 interchange. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into a 10” gravity sewer line that flows to Woodlawn.

© Woodlawn Pump Station — 440 Gem suction lift sewage pump station serving the Woodlawn community and receives pumped flow from the Airport Road and Exit 14 pumpstations. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into a 10” gravity sewer line flowing to the Crooked Creek pump station, The Woodlawn pump station has a 100,000 flow equalization tank system.

Crooked Creek Pump Station — 510 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving the Route 58 corridor near Crooked Creek. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into a 12” gravity sewer line that flows to the Hills Pump Station.

© Hills Pump Station — 620 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving the Glendale Road area. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into a 12” gravity sewer line flowing to the Gladeville Pump Station.

Gladeville Pump Station — 730 GPM suction lift sewage pump station serving the Gladeville community and Cranberry Road area. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into the

City of Galax’s sewer system The system also collects flow from the Fancy Gap system.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the City of Galax system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the City of Galax WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0078484).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon meter readings at the Gladeville pump station. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 21,298,756 13,240,749 62.2% February 16,145,566 14,142,131 87.6% March 23,187,302 16,142,558 69.6% April 19,450,290 18,845,290 96.9% May 20,117,710 17,308,570 86.0% June 23,281,245 21,282,867 91.4% July 18,629,974 24,280,328 130.3% August 17,169,376 16,826,000 98.0% September 20,445,596 16,562,140 81.0% October 17,790,041 14,395,035 80.9% November 18,459,600 15,287,869 82.8% December 17,490,200 13,285,814 76.0%

Monthly Average 19,455,471 16,799,946 86.4% Daily Average 639,632 552,327 86.4% Avg / Customer 665 574

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Gladeville/Cranberry collection system had 2 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. Both were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

• The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

An I/I study for this system is currently being completed by TLG.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on July 15, 2021:

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the City of Galax system, Treatment is ultimately provided at the City of Galax WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0078484).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon meter readings at the Gladeville pump station, A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 21,298,756 13,240,749 62.2% February 16,145,566 14,142,131 87.6% March 23,187,302 16,142,558 69.6% April 19,450,290 18,845,290 96.9% May 20,117,710 17,308,570 86.0% June 23,281,245 21,282,867 91.4% July 18,629,974 24,280,328 130.3% August 17,169,376 16,826,000 98.0% September 20,445,596 16,562,140 81.0% October 17,790,041 14,395,035 80.9% November 18,459,600 15,287,869 82.8% December 17,490,200 13,285,814 76.0% Monthly Average 19,455,471 16,799,946 86.4% Daily Average 639,632 552,327 86.4% Avg/ Customer 665 574

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Gladeville/Cranberry collection system had 2 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year

Both were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance System Needs Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation. Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

‘SSES ‘An I/I study for this system is currently being completed by TLG.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have an adopted CIP,

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on July 15, 2021:

Residential Sewer Commercial Sewer First 1,000 Gallons @ $24.20 Minimum First 2,000 Gallons @ $67.21 Minimum All Over 1,000 Gallons @ $11.00 per 1,000 Gallons All Over 2,000 Gallons @ $9.50 per 1,000 Gallons

Industrial Sewer

First 2,000 Gallons @ $67.25 Minimum All Over 2,000 Gallons @ $8.25 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $____N/A. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $ 5,186,011 in outstanding loans:

Loan Balance Payoff Date

$ 243,967 2039

  623,587  2040

2,820.590 2048

1,497,867 2052

Industrial Sewer

First 2,000 Gallons @ $67.25 Minimum All Over 2,000 Gallons @ $8.25 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $ N/A __. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘The system currently has approximately $_5,186,011 in outstanding loans:

Loan Balance Payoff Date $ 243,967 2039 623,587 2040 2,820,590 2048

1,497,867 2052

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

CA R R O

LL C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

LA D

EV IL

LE /

CR AN

BE R R Y

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Hillsville Manholes

Hillsville Gravity Mains

Town Boundary

Hillsville Wastewater System

Woodlawn Pump Station

Exit 14 Pump Station

DLB Pump Station

Industrial Park Pump Station

CCPSA Fancy Gap System

Legend

[Pump Station == Force Main

@ Manhole — Gravity Main

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 ee fect

Woodlawn Pump Station

{Ges The Hadar Map onal SRundanes Basa 30EP Elevation Program, Geograph Na tformaton ‘stem, atonal Brogan, Dats

Seuctres Datgeae Nepd Trsoortion Ds Brest TGERine SaB USES. Rona. Onta, Nard manta rtrgtion Unit and NORA National Coy Conta tae! Mosel at retested une, 2022

Hille . Wastewater System

xt 14 Pump Station

Dis Pump Station

Industral Park Pump Station

CPS Fancy Gap System

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SEWER STUDY 2022

GLADEVILLE/ CRANBERRY

CARROLL COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM | COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

CA R R O

LL C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

LA D

EV IL

LE /

CR AN

BE R R Y

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Galax Gravity Main

Galax Manhole

[Ú Galax Pump Station

Galax Wastewater System

Gladeville Pump Station

Hills Pump Station

Crooked Creek Pump Station

Legend

® Pump Station

== Force Main @ Manhole

— Gravity Main

= Galax Gravity Main e Galax Manhole

| Galax Pump Station

hills Pump Station

Gladeville Pump Station

‘Wastewater System

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 ee ect

Crooked Creek sae Pump Station

USGS The Nasional Map: Notional Boundaries Dataset, EP Elevation Progiam, Geographic Names Information system, Natonal Hydrography Oataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset and National Transportation Ostset; USGS Global Ecosfstems, US. Census Bureau TIGER/Uine data: USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Osta) US. Department of State Humantarian Information Unity and NORA National Centers for Enironmental Information, US (Coastal elie Mosel Oat refreshes ne, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CARROLL COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM

GLADEVILLE/ CRANBERRY

I-77 EXIT 1 COLLECTION SYSTEM
CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The I-77 Exit 1collection system serves a portion of the I-77 Exit 1 interchange, including the Loves Truck Stop. The collection system was constructed in 2010.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

0 Residential Customers 3 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 0 Other Municipal Systems 3 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 0% residential and 100% non- residential.

None of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

• Exit 1 Pump Station – 64 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the entire collection system. The pump station discharges through a 3” force main that empties into the WWTP.

The system does not collect flow from no other system(s).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the CCPSA’s I-77 Exit 1 WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0092312).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon the WWTP’s monthly DMR reports and customer billing records. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 248,000 377,600 152.3%

February 196,000 275,200 140.4%

March 248,000 433,200 174.7%

April 270,000 374,700 138.8%

May 300,000 413,400 137.8%

June 360,000 408,300 113.4%

July 341,000 444,900 130.5%

August 341,000 399,400 117.1%

September 240,000 392,300 163.5%

October 186,000 367,300 197.5%

November 210,000 357,500 170.2%

December 248,000 392,300 158.2%

Monthly Average 265,667 386,342 145.4%

Daily Average 8,734 12,702 145.4%

Avg / Customer 2,911 4,234

1-77 EXIT 1 COLLECTION SYSTEM CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The I-77 Exit Icollection system serves a portion of the I-77 Exit | interchange, including the Loves Truck Stop. The collection system was constructed in 2010.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

Residential Customers Commercial Customers

Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers.

wiciciwic

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 0% residential and 100% non- residential.

The collection system consists entirely of 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately _0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The entire system was constructed in 2010.

None of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines. ‘The system includes one pump station:

«Exit 1 Pump Station — 64 GM submersible grinder pump station serving the entire collection system. The pump station discharges through a 3” force main that empties into the WWTP.

The system does not collect flow from no other system(s). Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the CCPSA’s I-77 Exit | WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA00923 12). System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based upon the WWTP’s monthly DMR reports and

customer billing records. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated d Accountable January 2021 248,000 377,600 152.3% February 196,000 275,200 140.4% March 248,000 433,200 174.7% April 270,000 374,700 138.8% May 300,000 413,400 137.8% June 360,000 408,300 113.4% July 341,000 444,900 130.5% August 341,000 399,400 117.1% September 240,000 392,300 163.5% October 186,000 367,300 197.5% November 210,000 357,500 170.2% December 248,000 392,300 158.2% Monthly Average 265,667 386,342 145.4% Daily Average 8,734 12,702 145.4%

‘Avg / Customer 2,911 4,234

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The I-77 Exit 1 collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
• The system has had over 40 VPDES permit violations during the time period January-August 2022.
• The system entered into a Consent Order with DEQ in August 2021. The PSA initially complied with all

provisions of the Consent Order, but the system has received subsequent NOV’s from DEQ. The PSA is continuing to work with DEQ to address the VPDES Permit violations.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Frequent issues with pump station clogging, equipment failure at the WWTP, and violation of VPDES Permit effluent limits.

System Needs

• Upgrade of collection system pump station to include screening. Upgrade of WWTP or connection to the City of Mount Airy wastewater system for treatment.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

An SSES Report has not been completed for the system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on July 15, 2021:

Commercial Sewer

First 2,000 Gallons @ $67.21 Minimum All Over 2,000 Gallons @ $9.50 per 1,000 Gallons
All Over 200,000 Gallons @ $30.00 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $_________________. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $ in outstanding loan.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The I-77 Exit 1 collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

The system has had_over 40 VPDES permit violations during the time period January-August 2022.

«The system entered into a Consent Order with DEQ in August 2021. The PSA initially complied with all provisions of the Consent Order, but the system has received subsequent NOV’s from DEQ. The PSA is continuing to work with DEQ to address the VPDES Permit violations.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

«Frequent issues with pump station clogging, equipment failure at the WWTP, and violation of VPDES Permit effluent limits.

System Needs

Upgrade of collection system pump station to include screening, Upgrade of WWTP or connection to the City of Mount Airy wastewater system for treatment.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such

as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines. SSES An SSES Report has not been completed for the system

Capital Improvements Plan The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure The following monthly sewer rate structure was last modified on July 15, 2021: Commercial Sewer

First 2,000 Gallons @ $67.21 Minimum All Over 2,000 Gallons @ $9.50 per 1,000 Gallons All Over 200,000 Gallons @ $30.00 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $ (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘The system currently has approximately S in outstanding loan,

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

CA R R O

LL C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

I -7

7 EX

IT 1

[Ú

TPWW

0 500 1,000 1,500250

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Force Main TPWW WWTP

Manhole

Gravity Main

Exit 1 Pump Station

Legend [Pump Station |= Force Main

Sj wwe © Manhole

— Gravity Main

xt 1 Pump Station

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 ee fect

‘USGS The National Map. National Boundaries Dataset, S0EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hyérography Oataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Ont; Natural Earth Data; US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Unt: and NOAA National Centers fr Environmental Information, US.

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CARROLL COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - I-77 EXIT 1

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

CA R R O

LL C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

A IR

PO RT

AR EA

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Carroll County Wastewater System

Airport Road Pump Station

Woodlawn Pump Station

Exit 14 Pump Station

Legend

@ Manhole — Gravity Main Town Boundary

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 ee fect

Airport Road

Pump Station

Carroll County Wastewater System

Woodlawn

Pump Station [

‘ISGS The National Map: Natonal Boundaries Dataset, SOP Elevation Progam, Geographic Names Information System, National Hyetography Oataset, Natonal Land Conky Database, National Structures Dataset, and NatonalTonsportation Dataset; USGS Global Eclystems US. Census Bureau. TIGER/Line data; USFS. Road Osta; Natural Earth Data; US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Unit apd NOAA National Centers fr Environment Information, US. Coastal Rte Model Data eres une, 2022,

exit 14 _-| Pump Station

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WASTEWATER SYSTEM - AIRPORT AREA

CARROLL COUNTY

Bi K

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

CA R R O

LL C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM

R O

U TE

2 21

AR EA

[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Hillsville Manholes

Hillsville Gravity Mains

Town Boundary

Hillsville Elementary Pump Station

Hillsville Wastewater System

Legend

[Pump Station [== * Force Main

@ Manhole — Gravity Main

Hilsvile Elementary

<—__Initsvine Wastewater System

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 ee fect

Pump Station ot

‘USGS The National Map. National Boundaries Dataset, S0EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hyérography Oataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataret, and National Transportation Datset, USGS Global Ecosystems) US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Ont; Natural Earth Data; US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Unt: and NOAA National Centers fr Environmental Information, US.

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CARROLL COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - ROUTE 221 AREA

TOWN OF CHILHOWIE COLLECTION SYSTEM
Town of Chilhowie Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Chilhowie collection system serves the customers of the Town of Chilhowie located off I-81 Exit 35. The original collection system was constructed circa the 1960s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,039 Residential Customers 130 Commercial Customers

5 Industrial Customers 1 Other Municipal Systems

1,175 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 86% residential and 14% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 85% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 55% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2015. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1960s.

The system includes one (1) pump station:

• Kennametal Pump Station – 250 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the western portion of the Town’s sewer system and was constructed in 1980

The system also collects flow from a portion of the Smyth County sewer system at approximately 4,500 GPD.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Chilhowie Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0026379).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Month (2021) Gallons

Treated

Gallons

Billed

Percent

Accountable

January 9,744,000 Unknown

February 1,367,000 8,954,640 655%

March 14,929,000 16,563,383 111%

April 10,458,000 5,593,557 53%

May 5,313,000 5,440,829 102%

June 5,486,000 4,874,771 89%

July 6,440,000 5,349,049 83%

August 6,973,000 6,476,666 93%

September 5,682,000 17,083,214 301%

October 6,612,000 5,532,779 84%

November 5,043,000 16,209,005 321%

December 5,782,000 7,372,976 128%

Monthly Average 6,985,750 9,040,988

Daily Average 248,808 297,238

Avg/Customer 212 253

TOWN OF CHILHOWIE COLLECTION SYSTEM Town of Chilhowie Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Chilhowie collection system serves the customers of the Town of Chilhowie located off I-81 Exit 35. The original collection system was constructed circa the 1960s.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,039 Residential Customers 130 Commercial Customers

5 Industrial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 1,175 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 86% residential and 14% non-residential.

The system includes one (1) pump station:

Kennametal Pump Station — 250 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the western portion of the Town’s sewer system and was constructed in 1980

The system also collects flow from a portion of the

yyth County sewer system at approximately 4,500 GPD. ‘Treatment is ultimately provided at the Chilhowie Regional WWTP (VPDES Permit #V.A0026379).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows

Gallons Gallons Percent Month (202i) | treated | Billed _|Accountable|

anuary 9,744,000 | Unknown

February 1,367,000 8,954,640, 655% [March 14,929,000 | 16,563,383 111% [April 10,458,000 5,593,557, 53% [May 5,313,000 5,440,829 102% June 5,486,000 4,874,771 89% July 6,440,000 5,349,049 83% |August 6,973,000 6,476,666 93% September 5,682,000 | 17,083,214 301% October 6,612,000 5,532,779. 84% [November 5,043,000 | 16,209,005 321% [December 5,782,000 7,372,976 128% Monthly Average 6,985,750 | 9,040,988

Daily Average 248,808 | 297,238 |Avg/Customer 212 253

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Town of Chilhowie collection system had 3 reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021. Two (2) were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, and zero (0) were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris.

• The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

• I/I related overflows • Capacity issues related to I/I • Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

Two SSESs were performed on the system in 2021 and 2022 by Hurt & Proffitt. The SSESs identified a total of $3.2 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town of Chilhowie does not currently have Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) budgeted.

Asset Management Plan

The Town does not have an Asset Management Plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 2022.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is (information not provided). (Include table breakdown if possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Town currently has a total of $2,599,482 in outstanding loans:

• $270,649 - Matures October 2027 • $525,255 - Matures March 2029 • $788,923 - October 2033 • $1,014,655 - January 2042

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Chilhowie collection system had 3 reported sewer system overflows during the calendar ‘year 2021. Two (2) were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, and zero (0) were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

Virelated overflows
Capacity issues related to I

Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs © Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

Two SSESs were performed on the system in 2021 and 2022 by Hurt & Proffitt. The SSESs identified a total of, $3.2 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan The Town of Chilhowie does not currently have Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) budgeted.

Asset Management Plan

‘The Town does not have an Asset Management Plan,

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 2022.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is (information not provided). (Include table breakdown if possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘The Town currently has a total of $2,599,482 in outstanding loans: $270,649 - Matures October 2027

$525,255 - Matures March 2029

$788,923 - October 2033 $1,014,655 - January 2042

Town of Chithowie

Rate Schedule WATER oem beste su gua Residential nown Hu Mo nm rom ocr tea 331 Serk ut ot Town fen eas pon 250% Nowe WO perroorg EF Wes 2eOH ‘Commarcialiaduetrial tome frat 5000 9 om@ $ kn $s 500% Non aase00 gues ervocogs $e 500% Wow foo gue pervocoge: § $30 500% outot Town Frat $000 getns@ $8900 Mn ssn 260% Non 98000 goums@ $039 pers.coga $848 20m Afover $00,000 gaions@ $ 808 partOcoga $488 bios SEWER Residential Cane mere noun ie * Fr 200 ome $ THe og HE te Move 2000 g om@ $F pertteag § Eom out Tour Fee 2000 gatos@ $ 4808 nate 0 Mover 2000 goto $ HUM perteeng 3 aD Sey Commerciavindustrial Fast 000 gatos $M 5 nae swe Hot 498000 gems@ $0 8M pete Ee sour ‘Movs —S00800 Seioms@ $M pwns BROS ton unciPaL sin 2000 F 1800 gstons@ & 4 t 40 ae 6 Ss ooo gatree et aston quionse 4 41 Geet § uaa bal ator Mover 500000 gatons@ as Socom ¢ 4a aan, Per horeement rata aac Jay 3.2017 MUNICIPAL SEWER - Rate Sot by Smyth County fim 1000 gains @ $213 sone o% Row 029 perscooga $“8a8 * Mover 1843 pertooga §1tad *

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/16/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F CH

IL H

O W

IE W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,0001,000

Feet

Legend Manholes

Gravity Main

Force Main

[Ú Smyth County Pump Station

Smyth County Force Main

Smyth County Manhole

Smyth County Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Town of Chilhowie Wastewater System

Smyth County - WL Wastewater System

Smyth County - Greenhill and Shuler Hollow Wastewater System

Smyth County - Adwolfe Wastewater System

‘Smyth County = WL Wastewater System

‘Town of Chithowie Wastewater System

‘Smyth County ~ Greenhill and Shuler Hollow Wastewater System

VIRGINIA

‘Smyth County ~ Adwotfe /

Wastewater System

Legend @ = =Manholes — Gravity Main 2 Force Main Smyth County Pump Station Smyth County Force Main w @ = Smyth County Manhole

—— Smyth County Gravity Main

‘Town Boundary

LUSGS_The- National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names| Information Sytem, tinal Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National strectures Dataset, and National Pansparaton Dataset; USS Global Eesystems U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Une dt; USFS Road Data; Natrl Earth Dat: US. Deparment of State Humantadan Information Unt and NOAA| atonal Centefsfr Envronmental information, US. Coastal Rel! Model Data effeshed lune, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF CHILHOWIE WASTEWATER SYSTEM

TOWN OF FRIES COLLECTION SYSTEM
Town of Fries Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Fries collection system serves customers within the Town’s corporate limits.
The original collection system was constructed circa the mid 1900s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

286 Residential Customers 10 Commercial/Industrial Customers

296 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 92 % residential and 8 % non-residential.

The collection system consists of 6-inch through 12-inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately _Not Known % of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately Not Known % of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1988. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the mid 1900s.

The system includes two (2) pump stations:

• Blairtown Pump Station - Also called Fenders Curve Pump Station, is located near the New River Trail and a residence, just off of East Main Street on the east side of town. Currently serves 2 or 3 residences and the fire department. A 1,200 gallon underground emergency storage tank is located adjacent to the wetwell. Equipped with two (2) grinder pumps: Hydromatic Model# HPGH500 M3-2; 5 HP, 480-V, 3- phase, 60-Hz, 3450 rpm, 6.75” impeller.

• Fries Mill Pump Station - Located at the old Washington Mills site on the west end of town, adjacent to the New River. Currently serves 1 or 2 residences and 1 bathroom at the mill site. Equipped with two (2) grinder pumps: Hydromatic Model# HPGH500 M3-2; 5 HP, 480-V, 3-phase, 60-Hz, 3450 rpm, 6.75” impeller

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Fries WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0067881).

TOWN OF FRIES COLLECTION SYSTEM. Town of Fries Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Town of Fries collection system serves customers within the Town’s corporate limits. The original collection system was constructed circa the mid 1900s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

286 Reside

286 Customers 10 Commercial/Industrial Customers 296 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 92% residential and _8 %non-residential

The collection system consists of 6-inch through 12-inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately Not Known % of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately Not Known % of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1988. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the mid 1900s.

The system includes two (2) pump stations:

Blairtown Pump Station - Also called Fenders Curve Pump Station, is located near the New River Trail and a residence, just off of East Main Street on the east side of town. Currently serves 2 or 3 residences and the fire department. A 1,200 gallon underground emergency storage tank is located adjacent to the wetwell. Equipped with two (2) grinder pumps: Hydromatic Model# HPGH500 M3-2; 5 HP, 480-V, 3- phase, 60-Hz, 3450 rpm, 6.75” impeller.

Fries Mill Pump Station - Located at the old Washington Mills site on the west end of town, adjacent to the New River. Currently serves 1 or 2 residences and 1 bathroom at the mill site. Equipped with two (2) grinder pumps: Hydromatic Model# HPGH500 M3-2; 5 HP, 480-V, 3-phase, 60-Hz, 3450 rpm, 6.75” impeller

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Fries WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0067881).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021

3,385,000 580,860 17.2%

February

3,708,000 541,510 14.6%

March

3,527,000 412,190 11.7%

April

2,586,000 694,620 26.9%

May

2,013,000 627,830 31.2%

June

2,341,000 756,064 32.3%

July

2,293,000 642,816 28.0%

August

2,881,000 749,454 26.0%

September

2,248,000 701,847 31.2%

October

2,302,000 656,403 28.5%

November

1,919,000 815,320 42.5%

December

1,574,000 511,322 32.5%

Monthly Average 2,564,750 640,853 25.0%

Daily Average 84,321 21,069 25.0%

Avg / Customer 272 68

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Town of Fries collection system had zero (0) reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021.

• The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

• The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

• I/I related flow increases

• WWTP needs

• Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

• Inflow/Infiltration Reduction

• Line replacement.

• Manhole rehabilitation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

‘System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 3,385,000 580,860 17.2% February 3,708,000 541,510 14.6% March 3,527,000 412,190 11.7% April 2,586,000 694,620 26.9% May 2,013,000 627,830 31.2% dune 2,341,000 756,064 32.3% July 2,293,000 642,816 28.0% ‘August 2,881,000 749,454 26.0% September 2,248,000 701,847 31.2% October 2,302,000 656,403 28.5% November 1,919,000 815,320 42.5% December 1,574,000 511,322 32.5% Monthly Average 2,564,750 640,853 25.0% Daily Average 84,321 21,069 25.0% ‘Avg / Customer 272 68

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Fries collection system had zero (0) reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021.
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.

‘The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ,

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

WWTP needs

_Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Line replacement.
Manhole rehabilitation.

‘Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

An SSES Report has not been completed for the system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2017.

First 2,000 Gallons/Month @ $20.25 Minimum All Over 2,000 Gallons/Month @ $5.75 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $__Not Provided. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Town of Fries currently has one (1) outstanding loans associated with the sanitary sewer system. The sewer loan for $336,000 originated in 1988, has a 6.375% interest rate, debt service amount of $23,268/year, and will expire in November 2026.

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES ‘An SSES Report has not been completed for the system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2017.

First 2,000 Gallons/Month @ $20.25 Minimum All Over 2,000 Gallons/Month @ $5.75 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $_Not Provided. (Include table breakdown is possible).

‘System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

TOWN OF FRIES WWTP - VPDES VA0067881
Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located along the New River, off of East Main Street in Grayson County, Virginia. The facility was originally constructed in 1987 and there have been no major improvements since that time. The facility utilizes activated sludge (extended aeration) as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Fries collection system. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.220 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during the calendar year 2021 was 83,000 GPD; increasing to 200,000 GPD or more during rain events. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during the calendar year 2021 was 118,000 GPD . The facility exceeded N/A % capacity for N/A days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the New RIver. Sludge from the facility is discarded at the landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Fries. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day Monday – Friday, and 4 hours/day on Saturday and Sunday.

Permit Violations – The facility has had zero (0) permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

• Multiple units of equipment at end of useful life or out of service

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

• Repair to Influent Pump Station

• Replace Orbal Aerator disk drive bearings

• Replace Clarifier #2 drive gear

• Paint Clarifier equipment

• Repair Sludge Pump Return

• Repair broken valves

• Replace automatic transfer switch at generator

• Repair building roof at lab

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – A funding application was submitted to DEQ in July 2022 for $1,471,000 of repairs and renovations at the WWTP.

TOWN OF FRIES WWTP - VPDES VA0067881 Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

Facility Description ~ The treatment facility is located along the New River, off of East Main Street in Grayson County, Virginia. The facility was originally constructed in 1987 and there have been no major improvements since that time. The facility utilizes activated sludge (extended aeration) as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Character The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Fries collection system. The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.220 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during the calendar year 2021 was 83,000 GPD; increasing to 200,000 GPD or more during rain events. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during the calendar year 2021 was 118,000 GPD_. The facility exceeded _N/A% capacity for N/A days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the New River. Sludge from the facility is discarded at the landfill.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Fries. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day Monday — Friday, and 4 hours/day on Saturday and Sunday.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had zero (0) permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Multiple units of equipment at end of useful life or out of service Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:
Repair to Influent Pump Station
Replace Orbal Aerator disk drive bearings
Replace Clarifier #2 drive gear
Paint Clarifier equipment
Repair Sludge Pump Return,

Replace automatic transfer switch at generator Repair building roof at lab

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ A funding application was submitted to DEQ in July 2022 for $1,471,000 of repairs and renovations at the WWTP.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F FR

IE S

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM /

TPWW

[Ú

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500250

Feet

Legend TPWW WWTP

Force Main

Gravity Main

[Ú Pump Station

Town Boundary

Fender’s Curve Pump Station

Old Mill Pump Station

Town of Fries Wastewater System

_Joaran

Pump Station

Legend Ey] wwe

==> Force Main

— Gravity Main (H_ Pump Station fown Boundary

“Town of Fries Wastewater System

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 a ee Fect

{USGS The National Mapr Navona! Boundaries Ostet, 308 fevaton Program Geographic Namen Information Sytem, National Hysography Dataset, National Land Cover Oatabare, Naonal Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Lne dt; USFS Road Data; Natural Eath Dota; US. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOMA National Centers fr Eruconmental formation, U.S. Coastal elf Model Oat treshed lune, 2022

Fender’s Curve Pump Station

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF FRIES WASTEWATER SYSTEM

CITY OF GALAX WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The City of Galax Wastewater collection system serves the incorporated City of Galax and a portion of the Carroll County Public Service Authority’s Gladeville/Cranberry. The collection system was constructed 60 to 70 years ago with newer sections constructed 11 years ago.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

2,400 Residential Customers 40 Commercial Customers 460 Industrial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 2,901 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 83% residential and 17% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 8” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 54% of the system consists of terra cotta pipe and approximately 25% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed approximately 11 years ago. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed 60-70 years ago.

The system does experience problems with capacity due to inflow/infiltration.

The system includes three pump stations:

• BC Vaughan Pump Station – 1,200 GPM submersible pump station serving the eastern portions of the City. The pump station discharges through a 12” force main that empties at the WWTP. The pump station was last upgraded in 2019. The drainage basin for this pump station includes a flow equalization facility. This station has two 750 GPM low-flow pumps and two 1,200 GPM high-flow pumps.

• Ballards Branch Pump Station – 780 GPM submersible pump station serving the western portions of the City. The pump station discharges through an 8” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line that flows to the WWTP. The pump station was last upgraded in 2001.

• Fries Road Pump Station – 203 GPM submersible sewage pump station serving the Fries Road area of the City. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line that flows to the WWTP. The pump station was last upgraded in 2019.

The system also receives flow from the Carroll County Public Service Authority’s Gladeville/Cranberry system.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the City of Galax WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0078484) for treatment.

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are based upon metered flows at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

CITY OF GALAX WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The City of Galax Wastewater collection system serves the incorporated City of Galax and a portion of the Carroll County Public Service Authority’s Gladeville/Cranberry. The collection system was constructed 60 to 70 years ago with newer sections constructed 11 years ago.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

2,400 Residential Customers 40 — Commercial Customers 460 — Industrial Customers

1 Other Municipal Systems 2,901 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 83% residential and 17% non- residential,

The collection system consists of 8” through _24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 54% of the system consists of terra cotta pipe and approximately 25% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed approximately 11 years ago. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed 60-70 years ago.

‘The system does experience problems with capacity due to inflow/infiltration, ‘The system includes three pump stations:

BC Vaughan Pump Station ~ 1,200 GPM submersible pump station serving the eastern portions of the City. The pump station discharges through a 12” force main that empties at the WWTP. The pump stati was last upgraded in 2019. The drainage basin for this pump station includes a flow equalization f This station has two 750 GPM low-flow pumps and two 1,200 GPM high-flow pumps.

ty.

Ballards Branch Pump Station — 780 GPM submersible pump station serving the western portions of the City. The pump station discharges through an &” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line that flows to the WWTP. The pump station was last upgraded in 2001
Fries Road Pump Station 203 GPM submersible sewage pump station serving the Fries Road area of the City. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line that, flows to the WWTP. The pump station was last upgraded in 2019.

‘The system also receives flow from the Carroll County Public Service Authority’s Gladeville/Cranberry system

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the City of Galax WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0078484) for treatment,

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are based upon metered flows at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 60,826,000 42,586,000 70.0% February 62,620,000 0 0.0% March 62,738,000 52,027,000 82.9% April 53,915,000 0 0.0% May 48,200,000 39,788,000 82.5% June 46,664,000 0 0.0% July 47,819,000 46,679,000 97.6% August 49,787,000 0 0.0% September 45,923,000 44,874,000 97.7% October 48,610,000 0 0.0% November 42,618,000 48,757,000 114.4% December 41,327,000 0 0.0%
Monthly Average 50,920,583 22,892,583 45.0% Daily Average 1,674,101 752,633 45.0% Avg / Customer 577 260

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The City of Galax Wastewater Treatment Facility collection system had 11 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. There were 6 overflows due to excessive infiltration/inflow and there were 2 overflows due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

• The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Terra Cotta pipe joints allow root intrusion causing blockages and are a source of infiltration/inflow issues.

System Needs

• Replacement of old sewer mains, manhole rehabilitation, and infiltration/inflow remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

An SSES Report has not been completed for the system.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an adopted an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2019 . Bi-Monthly – First 6,000 Gallons @ $32.00 Min. Bill

All Over 6,000 Gallons/Month @ $4.50 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $_Not Provided. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $ Not Provided in outstanding loan.

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable Tanuary 2021 60,826,000 42,586,000 70.0% February 62,620,000 0 0.0% March 62,738,000 52,027,000 82.9% April 53,915,000 0 0.0% May 48,200,000 39,788,000 82.5% June 46,664,000 0 0.0% July 47,819,000 46,679,000 97.6% August 49,787,000 0 0.0% September 43,923,000 44,874,000 91.7% October 48,610,000 0 0.0% November 42,618,000 48,757,000 114.4% December 41,327,000 0 0.0% Monthly Average 50,920,583 22,892,583 45.0% Daily Average 1,674,101 752,633 45.0% Avg / Customer 877 260

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

© The City of Galax Wastewater Treatment Facility collection system had 11 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. There were 6 overflows due to excessive infiltration/inflow and there were 2 overflows due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris

The system has had @ permit violations over the past 2 years.

«The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Terra Cotta pipe joints allow root intrusion causing blockages and are a source of infiltration/inflow issues. System Needs
Replacement of old sewer mains, manhole rehabilitation, and infiltration/inflow remediation,

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES An SSES Report has not been completed for the system.

Capital Improvements Plan ‘The system currently does not have an adopted CIP.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system does not have an adopted an asset management plan. Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2019 Bi-Monthly ~ First 6,000 Gallons @ $32.00 Min. Bill ~ All Over 6,000 Gallons/Month @ $4.50 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $_Not Provided . (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $_Not Provided in outstanding loan.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/15/2022

IJR

2248

CI TY

O F

G AL

AX W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O RT

H AR

EA /

[Ú

TPWW

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend TPWW WWTP

[Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Gravity Main

Manhole

[Ú Carroll County Pump Station

Carroll County Manhole

Carroll County Force Main

Carroll County Gravity Main

City Limits

City of Galax Wastewater System

Carroll County - Gladeville Cranberry Wastewater System

Ballards Branch Pump Station

Fries Road Pump Station

BC Vaughan Pump Station

Mill Creek Flow Equalization Pump Station

Effluent Force Main

ern

Legend WwwrTP

Pump Station Force Main

— Gravity Main

@ Manhole

Hl Carroll County Pump Station

@ Carroll County Manhole Carroll County Force Main —— Carroll County Gravity Main == City Limits

ffuent Force Main

Pump Station

oats vn | ZI

Pump Station

City of Galax Wastewater System

Ties Rood /

0 1,000 2,000

4,000 6,000 8,000 ee ect

BC Vaughan Pump Station

Mill Creek Flow Equalization Pump Station

Carroll County @® | Giadeville Cranberry Wastewater System

USGS The National Map: Nationa Boundaries Dataset, OEP Elevation Progra ‘Geographic Names information Stem, Natonal Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Nations Structures Dataet, and Nationa Transportation Dataset, USGS Global Ecosse: US. Census Bureau TIGER/ine data USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Date; US. Deparment of State Humaniavan| Information Unt; and NORA National Centers for Ealronmental Infor, | LS. Coastal lef Model. Data refreshed June, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CITY OF GALAX WASTEWATER AREA

SYSTEM - NORTH

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/15/2022

IJR

2248

CI TY

O F

G AL

AX W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

O U

TH AR

EA /

[Ú

TPWW

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend TPWW WWTP

[Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Gravity Main

Manhole

City Limits

City of Galax Wastewater System

Ballards Branch Pump Station

Fries Road Pump Station

Waist

Semele n es,

Pump Station

. [Fries Road J

Ssoess, VIRGINIA

Legend wwe

Pump Station a Ballards Branch

©=+ Force Main Pump Station

— Gravity Main @ = Manhole

=== City Limits

City of Galax Wastewater System

4,000 6,000 8,000 ee ect

sos the Natonal Map: Nationa Bounderis atest, 30EP Elevation Progra ‘Geographic Nares information stem National Hyoaraphy Dataset, National land Cover Database, Notional Structures Dataset, and Navona Transporation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems: US. Census Bureau TIGER/Line ta USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; US. Department of state Humanitarian Information Unt and NOAA National Centers far Enironmental Infomation, | US. Coastal let Model. Data refreshed lune 2022.

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CITY OF GALAX WASTEWATER SYSTEM - SOUTH

AREA

a ‘yy

TOWN OF HILLSVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (VA0089443) Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Hillsville Wastewater Treatment System serves the Town of Hillsville located in Carroll County near the I-77 Exit 14 interchange and Route 58. The collection system was constructed in the 1980s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,050 Residential Customers 180 Commercial Customers 4 Industrial Customers 1 Other Municipal Systems

1,235 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 60% residential and 40% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4 inch through 15- inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 56% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 84% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 2009. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1980s.

The system includes three pump stations:

 Weddle Street #1 Pump Station – 46.5 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of Weddle Street. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line North East of Weddle Street #2 pump station.

 Weddle Street #2 Pump Station – 46.5 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of Weddle Street. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line North East of Weddle Street #2 pump station.

 58 West Pump Station – 98 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the west section of Route 58.
The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near the intersection of Howlett Street and West Stuart Drive.

The system also collects flow from the Carroll County system.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 10,845,000 9,517,608 88%

February 12,142,000 4,742,010 39%

March 12,929,000 11,114,446 86%

April 12,882,000 4,073,840 32%

May 11,351,000 12,457,273 110%

June 10,305,000 4,789,820 46%

July 10,703,000 10,387,656 97%

August 13,435,000 5,025,060 37%

September 10,951,000 13,511,313 123%

October 12,741,000 4,440,470 35%

November 10,042,000 11,362,305 113%

December 7,914,000 3,850,400 49%

TOWN OF HILLSVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (VA0089443)

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Hillsville Wastewater Treatment System serves the Town of Hillsville located in Carroll County near the I-77 Exit 14 interchange and Route 58. The collection system was constructed in the 1980s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,050 Residential Customers 180 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

4 1 Other Municipal Systems 235 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 60% residential and 40% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4 inch through 15- inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 56% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 84% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2009. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1980s.

The system includes three pump stations

Weddle Street #1 Pump Station — 46.5 GeM submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of Weddle Street. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line North East of Weddle Street #2 pump station.

© Weddle Street #2 Pump Station — 46.5 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the south side of Weddle Street. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line North East of Weddle Street #2 pump station.

© 58 West Pump Station — 98 GrM submersible grinder pump station serving the west section of Route 58. ‘The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near the intersection of Howlett Street and West Stuart Drive.

The system also collects flow from the Carroll County system

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 10,845,000 9,517,608 88% February 12,142,000 4,742,010 39% March 12,929,000 11,114,446 86% April 12,882,000 4,073,840 32% May 11,351,000 12,457,273 110%, June 10,305,000 4,789,820 46% July 10,703,000 10,387,656 97% August 13,435,000 5,025,060 31% September 10,951,000 13,511,313 123% October 12,741,000 4,440,470 35% November 10,042,000 11,362,305 113%

December 7,914,000 3,850,400 49%

Monthly Average 11,353,333 7,939,350 70%

Daily Average 373,260 261,020 70%

Avg / Customer 129 91

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Fancy Gap collection system had 13 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 0 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 13 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.

 The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Pump and motor failures at treatment plant,  Clogged pumps at the treatment plant,  Sealing concrete basins and repairing the basins,  Replacement of flow equalization basin aerators,  Replacement of the sludge press,  Replacement of the oxidation ditch mammoth rotor,  Replacing aging equipment in the collection system and treatment plant,  Roof replacement at treatment plant.

System Needs

 Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the system in November 2021 by Thompson & Litton. The SSES identified $3,398,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2019. The CIP includes $2,874,617 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Thompson & Litton in 2021.

Monthly Average 11,353,333, 7,939,350 10% Daily Average 373,260 261,020 10% Avg / Customer 129 oT

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Fancy Gap collection system had 13 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 0 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 13 were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease or other debris.
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Pump and motor failures at treatment plant,

Clogged pumps at the treatment plant,

Sealing conerete basins and repairing the basins,

Replacement of flow equalization basin aerators,

Replacement of the sludge press,

Replacement of the oxidation ditch mammoth rotor,

Replacing aging equipment in the collection system and treatment plant, Roof replacement at treatment plant.

System Needs © Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation, Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines,

SSES

ASSES was performed on the system in November 2021 by Thompson & Litton. The SSES identified $3,398,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2019. The CIP includes $2,874,617 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan The system has an asset management plan prepared by Thompson & Litton in 2021

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in July 2022:

Residential (In Town)

$53.20 First 4,000 Gallons

$7.96 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons till 200,000

$9.60 Every 1,000 Gallons Over 200,000

Commercial (In Town)

$84.44 First 4,000 Gallons

$7.96 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons till 200,000

$9.60 Every 1,000 Gallons Over 200,000

Industrial (In Town)

$163.04 First 4,000 Gallons

$7.96 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons till 200,000

$9.60 Every 1,000 Gallons Over 200,000

Residential (Out of Town)

$84.46 First 4,000 Gallons

$10.10 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons

Commercial (Out of Town)

$143.16 First 4,000 Gallons

$10.10 Every 1,000 gallons over 4,000 Gallons

Industrial (Out of Town)

$286.52 First 4,000 Gallons

$10.10 Every 1,000 gallons over 4,000 Gallons

Residential (Unmetered In Town) Residential (Unmetered out of Town)

$72.48 $103.58

Commercial (Unmetered In Town) Commercial (Unmetered out of Town)

$145.12 $143.16

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

Carter Bank Loan: Collection System: June 30th, 2022: $3,043,212.55

VRA Loan: UV System 2014: June 30th, 2022: $101,617.00

Skyline National Bank: Sewer System Upgrade 2000, June 30th, 2022: $789,315.00

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements –

The following improvements were identified in a 2019 PER for the Town of Hillsville:

 Sewer line replacement on Route 58,  Sewer line replacement near the VFW,  Sewer line replacement on Valley Street,  Sewer line replacement on East Grayson Street,  Sewer line replacement on Dogwood.

The above improvements had probable project costs estimated to be $2,440,000.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in July 2022:

Residential (In Town) $53.20 First 4,000 Gallons $7.96 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons till 200,000 $9.60 Every 1,000 Gallons Over 200,000 ‘Commercial (In Town) $84.44 First 4,000 Gallons $7.96 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons till 200,000 $9.60 Every 1,000 Gallons Over 200,000 Industrial (In Town) $163.04 First 4,000 Gallons $7.96 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons till 200,000 $9.60 Every 1,000 Gallons Over 200,000 Residential (Out of Town) $84.46 First 4,000 Gallons $10.10 Every 1,000 Gallons over 4,000 Gallons Commercial (Out of Town) $143.16 First 4,000 Gallons $10.10 Every 1,000 gallons over 4,000 Gallons Industrial (Out of Town) $286.52 First 4,000 Gallons $10.10 Every 1,000 gallons over 4,000 Gallons

Residential (Unmetered In Town) | Residential (Unmetered out of Town)

$72.48 $103.58

Commercial (Unmetered In Town) | Commercial (Unmetered out of Town)

$145.12 $143.16

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans Carter Bank Loan: Collection System: June 30", 2022: $3,043,212.55

VRA Loan: UV System 2014: June 30", 2022: $101,617.00 Skyline National Bank: Sewer System Upgrade 2000, June 30", 2022: $789,315.00

inion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements —

The following improvements were identified in a 2019 PER for the Town of Hillsville:

Sewer line replacement on Route 58, Sewer line replacement near the VFW,

Sewer line replacement on Valley Street, Sewer line replacement on East Grayson Street, Sewer line replacement on Dogwood.

The above improvements had probable project costs estimated to be $2,440,000.

0 750 1,500 j ( 2)

: be

i Se

Legend 3:

i Treatment Pant — ceaviy main —

[HB system pump station, ~~ Fore ain — | lanhole 5 © Nant we ota S10

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Weddle Street Pump Station #2

Weddle Street Pump Station #1

TOWN OF HILLSVILLE

island

Little Ree

58 West Pump Station

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Datases, 3DEP tle) ‘Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Struchites Datase Blreau TIGER/Line data; USFS fidad Data; Nature Earth Dataj US: Depart for Enviror

Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hyd“@graphy 1d National Transportation Dataset: USGS Glabal Ecosystems: US. Census int of State Humanitarian Information Uniti and NOAA Netional Centers tal Information, US. Coastal Relief Model, Data refreshed June, 2022.

TOWN OF INDEPENDENCE COLLECTION SYSTEM
Town of Independence Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Independence collection system serves the customers of the Town of Independence located off I-81 Exit 35. The original collection system was constructed circa the 1960s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

394 Residential Customers 105 Commercial/Industrial Customers 499 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 32% residential and 68% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 8-inch through 10-inch gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 75% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 3% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 1985. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1960s.

The system includes two (2) pump stations:

• Peach Bottom Pump Station – Originally installed in 1986 and upgraded in 2011. The pump is a quadruplex pump station with a flow rate of 250 gpm at 180’ TDH (~90,000 GPD with a Peak Flow of 225,000 GPD).

• Darco Pump Station – Submersible pump station was installed circa 1980s. 2 HP with a 2” discharge; flow rate and TDH is unknown.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Independence WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0064424).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Month (2021) Gallons

Treated

Gallons

Billed

Percent

Accountable

January 10,112,770 4,913,870 49%

February 10,172,500 4,496,163 44%

March 8,871,060 4,835,555 55%

April 8,769,212 4,204,137 48%

May 8,726,330 5,674,188 65%

June 8,405,360 4,923,031 59%

July 8,682,790 5,154,168 59%

August 8,351,270 4,835,389 58%

September 7,504,020 5,300,603 71%

October 8,808,460 5,326,170 60%

November 7,925,380 4,784,588 60%

December 8,566,050 4,890,178 57%

Monthly Average 8,741,267 4,944,837

Daily Average 311,333 176,117

Avg/Customer 624 353

TOWN OF INDEPENDENCE COLLECTION SYSTEM Town of Independence Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Independence collection system serves the customers of the Town of Independence located off I-81 Exit 35. ‘The original collection system was constructed circa the 1960s.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

394 Residential Customers Commercial/Industrial Customers 499 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flow amounts for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 32% residential and 68% non-residential.

The system includes two (2) pump stations

Peach Bottom Pump Station ~ Originally installed in 1986 and upgraded in 2011. The pump is a quadruplex pump station with a flow rate of 250 gpm at 180° TDH (~90,000 GPD with a Peak Flow of 225,000 GPD).
arco Pump Station — Submersible pump station was installed cirea 1980s. 2 HP with a 2” discharge; flow rate and TDH is unknown.

Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Independence WWTP (VPDES Permit #VA0064424).

System Flows - A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for the calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month (2021) "| treated | _silled _|Accountable

January 10,112,770 4,913,870, 49% February 10,172,500 4,496,163 44% [March 8,871,060 4,835,555 55% [April 8,769,212 4,204,137 48% [May 8,726,330 5,674,188 65% June 8,405,360 4,923,031 59% July 8,682,790 5,154,168 59% |August 8,351,270 4,835,389 58% [September 7,504,020 5,300,603 71% [October 8,808,460 5,326,170 60% [November 7,925,380 4,784,588 60% [December 8,566,050 4,890,178 57% [Monthly Average 8,741,267 4,944,837

Daily Average 311,333, 176,117

|Avg/Customer 624 353

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Town of Independence collection system had zero (0) reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021.

• The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

• I/I related overflows • Capacity issues related to I/I • Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

• Line replacement. • Manhole rehabilitation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

A SSES was performed on the Town’s entire system in 2021 by The Lane Group, Inc. The SSES identified $1,010,840 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

The Town of Independence Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) consists of a Sub-Basin I-179 Gravity Line and System-Wide Manhole Improvements Project.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group, Inc. in 2021.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure is currently in effect.

Residential Customers Commercial & Industrial Customers

$23.63 for first 1,000 Gallons, Minimum $29.54 for First 1,000 Gallons, Minimum All Over @ $7.13 per 1,000 Gallons All Over @ $8.91 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of the probable cost for the identified system improvements is $1,010,840.

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The Town of Independence currently has no outstanding loans associated with the sanitary sewer system.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Independence collection system had zero (0) reported sewer system overflows during the calendar year 2021
The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years,
The system is not under a consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance-Related Issues Experienced by System

Virelated overflows © Capacity issues related to I
Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance

System Needs

Line replacement.
Manhole rehabilitation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES)

ASSES was performed on the Town’s entire system in 2021 by The Lane Group, Ine. The SSES identified $1,010,840 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.

Capital Improvements Plan

‘The Town of Independence Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) consists of a Sub-Basin 1-179 Gravity Line and System-Wide Manhole Improvements Project.

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group, Inc. in 2021

Sewer Rate Structure

The following monthly sewer rate structure is currently in effect.

Residential Customers $23.63 for first 1,000 Gallons, Minimum $29.54 for First 1,000 Gallons, Minimum. All Over @ $7.13 per 1,000 Gallons All Over @ $8.91 per 1,000 Gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of the probable cost for the identified system improvements is $1,010,840,

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘The Town of Independence currently has no outstanding loans associated with the sanitary sewer system

Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Overall Costs

10-inch Gravity Sewer CIPP lining, inclusive of

cleaning & bypass pumping 4,638 LF $ 125 $579,750

8-inch Gravity Sewer Trenchless Interior Lining,

inclusive of cleaning 900 LF $ 100 $90,000

Manhole Rehab (Calcium Aluminate Cement) 127 VF $ 225 $28,575

Manhole Rehab (Cementious & Epoxy Lining) 31 VF $ 350 $10,850

Water-Tight Frame and Cover 13 EA $ 1,000 $13,000

I/I Manhole Insert 13 EA $ 250 $3,250

Seal Joints 4 EA $ 400 $1,600

Replace Frame and Cover 1 EA $ 600 $600

Reseal Existing Frame 1 EA $ 750 $750

Mobilization (@ 5.00%) 1 LS $ 36,418.75 $36,419

$764,794

Contingency 10% $76,479

Basic Engineering 12.0% $91,775

Additional Services 2% $16,995

Inspection 700 hours $65 $45,500

Legal, Fiscal, & Administrative 2% $15,296

$246,046

$1,010,840

TABLE 4.1 - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

Total Construction Cost

Subtotal Related Cost

Total Opinion of Probable Project Cost

TABLE 4.1 - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.

Description Quantity | Units | Unit Cost_ | Overall Costs abtochcoty Seu CiPPiin, inclusive of ag3e us 1s $579,250 inch crv Sewer ences Interior Lining, 900 “ls 100 $90,000 Manhole Rehab (Calcium Aluminate Cement) 127 ve_[s 225 $28,575 Manhole Rehab (Cementious & Epoxy Lining) 31 ve_[s 350 $10,850 |Water-Tight Frame and Cover 3B fa__|s 1,000 $13,000] I/I Manhole Insert 2B fa_[s 250 $3,250 seal Joints 4 fa_[s 400 $1,600 Replace Frame and Cover 1 fa_[s 600 $600} Reseal Existing Frame 1 fa_[s 750 $750] Mobilization (@ 5.00%) 1 is__|s_ 36,418.75 $36,419 Total Construction Cost $764,794

[Contingency 10% $76,479 Basic Engineering 12.0% $91,775 [Additional Services 2% $16,995 Inspection 700 | hours $65 $45,500] Legal, Fiscal, & Administrative 2% $15,296 Subtotal Related Cost $246,046

Total Opinion of Probable Project Cost

$1,010,840]

TPWW

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main TPWW WWTP

Force Main

[Ú Pump Station

Town Boundary

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/15/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F IN

D EP

EN D

EN CE

W AS

TE W

AT ER

SY ST

EM /

Town of Independence Wastewater System

Peach Bottom Creek Pump Station

Darco Southern Pump Station

Legend ~—

. @ Manhole

— Gravity Main

[& wwte Peach Bottom Creek = Force Main [© Pump Station

‘! Town Boundary

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Darco Southem e Pump Station eee . Se aig" wae Casa RK Z2Se SGn0 Sabre won Town of Independence FHa Wastewater System ZS Usd the atonal Maps National Boundaries Dataset, 30EP elevation] [== Program, Geographic Names Inoitan System, Nationa yooh Date Natal Land Cover Omtabae,Natoral Scores Cae ana atonal Tansparaton Dataset, USGS Globe Ecooysers; U.S. Clas

Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Unt; and NOMA National] =m ee ect

Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Rlef Model, Dat refreshed tune, 2022, i Tne

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 ( Bureau TIGER/Lne data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data, us.) [FT

TOWN OF MARION COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF MARION Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Marion collection system serves the Town of Marion and Smyth County service areas identified as Atkins, Hungry Mother, Staley Creek, and Cedars (consisting of Hall Addition and Adwolfe). The Town of Marion is located near the I-81 Exit 45. The collection system was constructed in 1920’s with several small upgrades completed recently and with additional work planned.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1830 Residential Customers 1126 Commercial Customers

0 Industrial Customers 4 Other Municipal Systems

2960 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 62% residential and 38% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 2” through 36” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 53_% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 53_% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 2021. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1920’s.

The _______ area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes four pump stations:

• Washington Avenue Pump Station – 90 GPM duplex suction lift pump station serving the southwest side of Marion near the South Main Street/ Washington Avenue intersection. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line east on Main Street.

• Jones Street Pump Station – 90 GPM duplex suction lift pump station serving a central part of town near Jones Street, on the north side of Main Street. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer just past the crest of Jones Street.

• Laurel Street Pump Station – 30 GPM simplex grider sewage pump station serving a small section of eastern Marion near the intersection of Highland Drive and Stage Street. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located on Stage Street.

• Influent Pump Station at WWTP – 5900 GPM Triplex submersible pump station pumping into WWTP.

The system also collects flow from the bordering areas of Smyth County in the following subsystems: (Atkins, Staley Creek, Hungry Mother, Hall Addition/Adwolfe ).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

TOWN OF MARION COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF MARION Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Marion collection system serves the Town of Marion and Smyth County service areas identified as Atkins, Hungry Mother, Staley Creek, and Cedars (consisting of Hall Addition and Adwolfe). The Town of Marion is located near the I-81 Exit 45. The collection system was constructed in 1920°s with several small upgrades completed recently and with additional work planned.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1830 Residential Customers 1 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers.

sek R

8 & 3

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 62% residential and 38% non- residential

The collection system consists of 2” through 36” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 53_% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 53% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2021 The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the _1920°s

The | area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes four pump stat

Washington Avenue Pump Station ~ 90 GrM duplex suction lift pump station serving the southwest side of Marion near the South Main Street/ Washington Avenue intersection. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line east on Main Street.

Jones Street Pump Station — 90 GPM duplex suction lift pump station serving a central part of town near Jones Street, on the north side of Main Street. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that ‘empties into an 8” gravity sewer just past the crest of Jones Street.

© Laurel Street Pump Station ~ 30 GPM simplex grider sewage pump station serving a small section of eastern Marion near the intersection of Highland Drive and Stage Street. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located on Stage Street.

‘© Influent Pump Station at WWTP — 5900 GPM Triplex submersible pump station pumping into WWTP.

The system also collects flow from the bordering areas of Smyth County in the following subsystems: (Atkins, Staley Creek, Hungry Mother, Hall Addition/Adwolfe ).

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant, Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system (Town and Smyth County) are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows (including flow from Smyth County subsystems) for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 51,210,000 21,128,611 41.3% February 62,800,000 19,432,550 30.9% March 71,790,000 17,679,515 24.6% April 45,530,000 20,534,199 45.1% May 35,400,000 20,134,613 56.9% June 33,940,000 20,638,631 60.8% July 37,810,000 25,956,097 68.6% August 34,907,000 22,817,800 65.4% September 33,170,000 23,713,497 71.5% October 36,860,000 20,896,155 56.7% November 31,300,000 22,266,168 71.1% December 32,460,000 20,609,064 63.5% Monthly Average 42,264,750 21,317,242 50.4% Daily Average 1,389,526 700,841 50.4% Avg / Customer 469 237

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Town of Marion collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. The last overflow of record was in November 2020. The overflow occurred during heavy rains and were thought to be due to high inflow.

• The system has had _0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Equipment replacement, repairs to existing facilities, need for a generator

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the Town’s sewer system in 2022 by The Lane Group. The study region included areas of Hollow Road, Park Street, Prater Lane, Oak, Hickory, Dogwood and Fern Lanes. The SSES identified $_1.3 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects. The project is scheduled to be funded by VDEQ.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP, summarized June 7, 2021. The CIP includes approximately $300,000 per year of proposed work through 2026. Approximately $ 1.8 million of projects are planned for completion in the next 5 years. A summary of the CIP is shown in the Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in 2022 as part of the SSES.

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 51,210,000 21,128,611 41.3% February 62,800,000 19,432,550 30.9% March 71,790,000 17,679,515 24.6% April 45,530,000 20,534,199 43.1% May 35,400,000 20,134,613 56.9% June 33,940,000 20,638,631 60.8% July 37,810,000 23,956,097 68.6% August 34,907,000 22,817,800 65.4% September 33,170,000 23,713,497 115% October 36,860,000 20,896,155 56.7% November 31,300,000 22,266,168 111% December 32,460,000 20,609,064 63.5% Monthly Average 42,264,750 21,317,242 50.4% Daily Average 1,389,526 700,841 50.4% Avg/ Customer 469 237

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Marion collection system had @ reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021 The last overflow of record was in November 2020. The overflow occurred during heavy rains and were thought to be due to high inflow.

The system has had_0_permit violations over the past 2 years.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Equipment replacement, repairs to existing facilities, need for a generator System Needs © Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in 2022 as part of the SSES.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rates

Inside Corporate Limits - Sewer

First 2,000 gallons - $15.61 minimum charge.

Next 2,000 gallons - $9.44 per 1,000 gallons.

Outside Corporate Limits - Sewer

First 2,000 gallons - $31.19 minimum charge.

Next 2,000 gallons - $18.82 per 1,000 gallons.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $__$4.6 million_. See summary in Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects.
(Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $3,836,870 in outstanding loans as of June 22, 2022.

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2022

1 VRA 5/7/2047 406,658

2 VRA 4/25/2045 563,058

3 VRA 12/11/2048 423,700

4 VRA 7/15/2037 321,999

5 VRA 9/25/2036 505,175

6 12/10/2031 1,010,280

7 Rural Development 7/6/2041 606,000

Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rates

Inside Corporate Limits - Sewer

First 2,000 gallons - $15.61 minimum charge. ‘Next 2,000 gallons - $9.44 per 1,000 gallons.

Outside Corporate Limits - Sewer

First 2,000 gallons - $31.19 minimum charge. Next 2,000 gallons - $18.82 per 1,000 gallons.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $_$4.6 million. See summary in Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects. (Include table breakdown is possible).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $3,836,870 in outstanding loans as of June 22, 2022.

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date ince as of June 30, 2022 1 VRA 5/7/2047 406,658 2 VRA 4/25/2045 563,058 3 VRA 12/11/2048 423,700 4 VRA 7/15/2037 321,999 5 VRA 9/25/2036 505,175 6 12/10/2031 1,010,280 7 Rural Development 7/6/2041 606,000

MARION WWTP – VPDES PERMIT #0086304 TOWN OF MARION, WWTP FACILITY OWNER MOUNT ROGERS PDC

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at _1580 Daisy Lane, Marion, Virginia __ (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in _1993. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2014 and involved ___________ . The facility utilizes ___Secondary treatment __________ as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the _Town of Marion and residents/businesses of Smyth County collection system(s). The facility does/does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is __3.4 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.4. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was _2.1 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for ___2__days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Middle Fork Holston River . Sludge from the facility will be composted until Class 1 treatment level is suitable for land application.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by The Town of Marion. Currently, 5 full time and ______ part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 1, 2_ Class 2 and 1 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed _8 hours/day M-F and 4 hours/day S-S.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 2 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of overflows at the WWTP during periods of heavy rain.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Equipment replacement  Repairs to existing facilities  Need for a Generator

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 The Town of Marion has identified about $1.5 million of rehab and repair work at the WWTP

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $1.5 million. (Include tale breakdown if possible)

MARION WWTP - VPDES PERMIT #0086304 TOWN OF MARION, WWTP FACILITY OWNER

MOUNT ROGERS PDC Facility Description ~The treatment facility is located at _1580 Daisy Lane, Marion, Virginia (see

attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in_1993_. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in__2014_and involved The facility utilizes __ Secondary treatment as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Marion and residents/businesses of Smyth County collection system(s). The facility does/does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is__ 3.4. MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.4. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 2.1 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for__2_days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the lle Fork Holston River, Sludge from the facility will be composted until Class 1 treatment level is

suitable for land application,

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by _The Town of Marion, Currently, 5 full time and part time licensed operators work at the facility. __2.__Class 1, 2 Class 2 and 1 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed _8 hours/day M-F and 4 hours/day

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had __2 _ permit violations over the past 2 years, The violations were the result of overflows at the WWTP during periods of heavy rain.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Repairs to existing facilities

Facility Needs — Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows

The Town of Marion has identified about $1.5 million of rehab and repair work at the WWwIP

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $_1.5 million _. (Include tale breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F M

AR IO

N W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

[Ú TPWW

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend TPWW WWTP

Manhole

[Ú Pump Station

Gravity Main

Force Main

Smyth County Gravity Main

Smyth County Manhole

Smyth County Force Main

[Ú Smyth County Pump Station

Town Boundary

Town of Marion Wastewater System

Smyth County - Hungry Mother Wastewater System

Influent Pump Station

Washington Avenue Pump Station

Jones Street Pump Station

Laurel Street Pump Station

Smyth County - Hall Addition Wastewater System

Smyth County - Staley Creek Wastewater System

Smyth County - Atkins Wastewater System

A ‘Smyth County = 4 \ = a”

Hungry Mother Wastewater System

Legend fj wwtp @ = Manhole [Pump Station — Gravity Main =» Force Main

—— Smyth County Gravity Main Smyth County Manhole ==> Smyth County Force Main Smyth County Pump Station “! Town Boundary

‘Smyth County = Atkins Wastewater System

‘Jones Street Pump Station

Laurel Street Pump Station

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Town of Marion Wastewater System

Tnfluent Pump Station

TOWN OF MARION WASTEWATER SYSTEM

mn ‘Washington Avenue Pump Station nt . ‘Smyth County ~ ‘Smyth County - Staley Creek Hall Addition Wastewater System Wastewater System K ieee ED oh Goeaiilinen” sPeyml sie nee Information System, National Hydrography Dstaset, National Land Cover Database, National structures] [FATT [Se O00 2,000 4.000 6,000 8,000 Dna ond NotonalTrsprtaton Brose Uses Gtal rsync; U3 Cen ute TGEMune dat: | Femme Feet ‘USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA| —

National Centers fr Environmental information, US. Coastal Rel Model Dat refreshed june, 2022 Tne

TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Rural Retreat collection system primarily serves the Town of Rural Retreat located just south of I-81, Exit 60. A small portion of gravity sewer extends to around 70 residents of Wythe County (outside of Town limits). The collection system was constructed in the 1960’s and 1970’s with upgrades in
2022.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

674 Residential Customers 59 Commercial Customers 5 Industrial Customers 4 Other Municipal Systems (Public Authorities)

742 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 60% residential and 40% non- residential.

The collection system consists of __8” through 15” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 10% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2022. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1960’s.

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

• Black Lick Road Pump Station – 200 GPM suction lift pump station serving the north section of the Rural Retreat system, generally land north of the Food Country shopping center. The pump station discharges through a 8” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line south of the pump station about 5,000 LF on Main Street near Food Country.

The system also collects flow from Wythe County residents adjacent to Town limits.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Town of Rural Retreat WWTP_ system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Rural Retreat WWTP (VPDES Permit #0021326_).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 7,800,000 3,900,000 50.0% February 16,800,000 3,100,000 18.5% March 15,400,000 3,800,000 24.7% April 8,800,000 3,300,000 37.5% May 4,800,000 3,600,000 75.0% June 4,900,000 3,700,000 75.5% July 6,000,000 3,900,000 65.0% August 5,100,000 3,700,000 72.5% September 4,100,000 3,400,000 82.9% October 4,000,000 3,500,000 87.5% November 3,100,000 3,400,000 109.7% December 3,200,000 3,800,000 118.8% Monthly Average 7,000,000 3,591,667 51.3% Daily Average 230,137 118,082 51.3%

TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Rural Retreat collection system primarily serves the Town of Rural Retreat located just south of I-81, Exit 60. A small portion of gravity sewer extends to around 70 residents of Wythe County (outside of Town limits). The collection system was constructed in the 1960’s and 1970’s with upgrades in 2022.

‘The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

674 Residential Customers 59 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems (Public Authorities)

2 Total Number of Customers

Bia

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 60% residential and 40% non- residential

The collection system consists of _8” through _15” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 10% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0 _% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2022 The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in _1960’s

No area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes one pump station:

Black Lick Road Pump Station ~ 200 GPM suction lift pump station serving the north section of the Rural Retreat system, generally land north of the Food Country shopping center. The pump station discharges through a 8” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line south of the pump station about 5,000 LF on Main Street near Food Country.

‘The system also collects flow from Wythe County residents adjacent to Town limits, Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Rural Retreat WWTP. system. Treatment is ultimately

provided at the Town of Rural Retreat WWTP (VPDES Permit #0021326_).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 7,800,000 3,900,000 50.0% February 16,800,000 3,100,000 18.5% March 15,400,000 3,800,000 24.7% April 8,800,000 3,300,000 37.5% May 4,800,000 3,600,000 75.0% June 4,900,000 3,700,000 75.59% July 6,000,000 3,900,000 65.0% August 5,100,000 3,700,000 2M September 4,100,000 3,400,000 82.9% October 4,000,000 3,500,000 87.5% November 3,100,000 3,400,000 109.7% December 3,200,000 3,800,000 118.8% Monthly Average 7,000,000 3,591,667 51.3%

Daily Average 230,137 118,082 51.3%

Avg / Customer 281 144
Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Town of Rural Retreat collection system had 2 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. The overflows were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow.

• The system has had several permit violations over the past 2 to 3 years. Refer to VDEQ Consent Order for details (below).

• The system is under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated August 24, 2021 and was issued for several reasons as described below.

The WWTP exceeded the discharge limitations for certain parameters. Specifically, E.Coli average concentration was exceeded in September 2020, 353 ammonia concentrations were exceeded in October 2020, Biologic Oxygen Demand (BOD) was exceeded in February and March 2021, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) was exceeded in February 2021.
Several manhole overflows were noted. Some of the overflows and other violations were not properly reported to VDEQ within the required 5 day timeframe.
The WWTP reported monthly flow exceeding 95% of the design flow for several consecutive months over a 2-year period.
Certain monitoring at the WWTP was not being conducted at the frequency required by the permit.

The Consent Order prompted a sewer system rehabilitation plan. The Town developed a plant to reduce infiltration and inflow into the system. The initial phase, Phase 1 Sewer System Improvements Project is nearing completion. The WWTP has already noted a reduction of flow during and after heavy rains. This $1.4 million project is intended to minimize infiltration and inflow into the system.

The WWTP has also upgraded their monitoring frequency to comply with the Permit.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Cleaning of basins, clarifiers, UV lights, and equipment during high flow events

System Needs

• Future capacity needs, cleaning basins, replacing worn valves

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the Town’s sewer system in 2022 by The Lane Group. The study region included the Town’s northern sewer shed. The SSES identified $_430,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects.
The project is scheduled to be funded by VDEQ.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted. Proposed sewer line rehabilitation or replacement projects the Town is considering are summarized in the Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects. The opinion of probable cost for these projects is approximately $4.4 million.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in 2022 as part of the SSES.

Avg / Customer 281 144 Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

«The Town of Rural Retreat collection system had 2 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. The overflows were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow.

The system has had several permit violations over the past 2 to 3 years. Refer to VDEQ Consent Order for details (below).

The system is under consent order with the DEQ. The consent order is dated August 24, 2021 and was issued for several reasons as described below.

The WWTP exceeded the discharge limitations for certain parameters. Specifically, E.Coli average concentration was exceeded in September 2020, 353 ammonia concentrations were exceeded in October 2020, Biologic Oxygen Demand (BOD) was exceeded in February and March 2021, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) was exceeded in February 2021.
Several manhole overflows were noted. Some of the overflows and other violations were not properly reported to VDEQ within the required 5 day timeframe.
The WWTP reported monthly flow exceeding 95% of the design flow for several consecutive months over a 2-year period.
Certain monitoring at the WWTP was not being conducted at the frequency required by the permit.

‘The Consent Order prompted a sewer system rehabilitation plan, The Town developed a plant to reduce infiltration and inflow into the system. The initial phase, Phase 1 Sewer System Improvements Project is nearing completion. The WWTP has already noted a reduction of flow during and after heavy rains. This $1.4 million project is intended to minimize infiltration and inflow into the system.

The WWTP has also upgraded their monitoring frequency to comply with the Permit

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

System Needs «Future capacity needs, cleaning basins, replacing worn valves

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SES

‘A SSES was performed on the Town’s sewer system in 2022 by The Lane Group. The study region included the ‘Town’s northern sewer shed. The SSES identified $_430,000 of recommended system rehabilitation projects. The project is scheduled to be funded by VDEQ.

Capital Improvements Plan

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in 2022 as part of the SSES.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022. Sewer Rates

First 2,000 gallons $25.64 minimum bill

Next 2,000 gallons $6.36 per 1,000 gallons Next 2,000 gallons $6.56 per 1,000 gallons Next 4,000 gallons $6.96 per 1,000 gallons Over 10,000 gal. $8.62 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $__4.4 million. (see Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects).

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $517,347 in outstanding loans.

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2022

1 Rural Development 9/27/2041 376,851

2 VRA Water Facilities Loan 5/1/2033 53,720

3 2011 Refunding Bond 10/27/2028 86,776

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rates First 2,000 gallons $25.64 minimum bill Next 2,000 gallons $6.36 per 1,000 gallons Next 2,000 gallons $6.56 per 1,000 gallons Next 4,000 gallons $6.96 per 1,000 gallons Over 10,000 gal. $8.62 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $_4.4 (see Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects).

‘System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $517,347 in outstanding loans.

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2022 1 Rural Development 9/27/2041 376,851 2 VRA Water Facilities Loan 5/1/2033 53,720 3 2011 Refunding Bond 10/27/2028 86,776

TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT WWTP – VPDES PERMIT #0021326 TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT, WWTP FACILITY OWNER MOUNT ROGERS PDC

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 403 Four Seasons Road, Rural Retreat, VA
(see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1943. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1986 and involved improvements to current conditions. The facility utilizes Extended Aeration Activated Sludge_ as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Rural Retreat and about 75 residents/authorities of Wythe County collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is _0.25 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.17 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was _0.46_MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 83_days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to South Fork Reed Creek, unnamed tributary. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at BFI Carter Valley Landfill, Bluff City, TN by Fort Chiswell Septic.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by _The Town of Rural Retreat.
Currently, 2 full time and ______ part time licensed operators work at the facility. _1 Class 3.
The facility is required to be staffed _8 hours/day M-F and 4 hours/day S-S.

Permit Violations – The facility has had sever permit violations over the past 2 to 3 years. Due to the violations, the Town is under Consent Order by VDEQ. The Consent Order is summarized in a later document. Work to address permit violations is under way.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Cleaning of basins, clarifiers, UV lights, and equipment during high flow events

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Replacing worn valves  Cleaning Aeration basins  Future capacity issues

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $To Be Determined_. (Include tale breakdown if possible)

TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT WWTP - VPDES PERMIT #0021326 TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT, WWTP FACILITY OWNER MOUNT ROGERS PDC

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at _403 Four Seasons Road, Rural Retreat, VA (sce attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in _1943. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in__1986 and involved improvements to current conditions. The facility utilizes _Extended Aeration Activated Sludge _ as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the _ Town of Rural Retreat and about 75 residents/authorities of Wythe County _ collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is__0.25__ MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was __0.17 _ MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was _0.46 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 83 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to South

Fork Reed Creek, unnamed tributary _. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at BFI Carter Valley Landfill, Bluff City, TN by Fort Chiswell Septic .

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by _ The Town of Rural Retreat Currently, 2 _ full time and part time licensed operators work at the fa

The facility is required to be staffed _8 hours/day M-F and 4 hours/day S-S.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had sever permit violations over the past 2 to 3 years. Due to the violations, the Town is under Consent Order by VDEQ. The Consent Order is summarized in a later document, Work to address permit violations is under way.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Cleaning of basins, clarifiers, UV lights, and equipment during high flow events

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Replacing worn valves
Cleaning Aeration basins Future capacity issues

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $___ To Be Determined (Include tale breakdown if possible)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

TO W

N O

F R U

R AL

R ET

R EA

T W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

TPWW

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500

Feet

Legend TPWW WWTP

[Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Force Main

Blacklick Road Pump Station

Rural Retreat Wastewater System

Legend fl wwe Pump Station e@ Manhole — Gravity Main ‘! Town Boundary

Force Main

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 a = ect

scs the National Map: National Boundaries Ostase, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information Sytem, National ysography Dataset, National Land Cove Database, National Structures Dataset, and Natlonal Transportation Dataset; USGS Gabal ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Lne data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Oats: US. Department of state Humantaran efermation Un; and NOAA National Centers for Envonmantal formation U.S, Coastal Reef Mode. Oats refreshed June, 2022.

Blacklick Road Pump Station

Rural Retreat Wastewater System

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF RURAL RETREAT WASTEWATER SYSTEM

TOWN OF SALTVILLE COLLECTION SYSTEM
TOWN OF SALTVILLE Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Saltville collection system serves the Town of Saltville and Smyth County communities adjacent to Saltville, which is located about 10 miles north of I-81 Exit 35 (Chilhowie exit) via state Rte. 107. The collection system was constructed in the early 1970’s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

880 Residential Customers 61 Commercial Customers 2 Industrial Customers 4 Other Municipal Systems

947 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately ____% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately _____% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in ___2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the early 1970’s.

The Government Plant Road area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes seven pump stations:

• McCready Pump Station – 176 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the McCready area of Saltville and residents of Smyth County. The McCready area is located on the northeastern side of Saltville along E. Main Street. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main westerly along Main Street about 3,200 LF that empties into an 8” gravity sewer.

• Henrytown Pump Station – 78 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north end of
Henrytown Road. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line about 2500 LF southeast of pump station adjacent to Henrytown Road.

• Farm Road Pump Station – Low flow older pneumatic Pot system that serves the Food Country center, the Wellness Center, and other downtown buildings. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that travels about 1000 LF and empties into a 8” gravity sewer line near the intersection of Palmer Avenue and Panther Lane.

• Government Plant Road Pump Station – 350 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives flow McCready sewer pump station and gravity sewer lines from the southeastern side of Saltville. The pump station discharges through a 8” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along East Main Street about 3,600 LF southeast of the pump station.

• Plasterco Pump Station – 200 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives flow from the southwestern portion of Saltville, including W. Main Street, Old Quarry Road and Edgemont Subdivision, located on the east side of Worthy Blvd (Rte 107). The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that runs around 2700 LF along Main Street, where it empties into an 8” gravity sewer that flows to Rte. 91 Pump Station.

• Rte. 91 Pump Station – 250 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives flow Plasterco and Henrytown sewer pump stations plus 8”gravity lines to the east and west along Main Street. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that travels along East Main about 3,000 LF that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

TOWN OF SALTVILLE COLLECTION SYSTEM TOWN OF SALTVILLE Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Town of Saltville collection system serves the Town of Saltville and Smyth County ‘communities adjacent to Saltville, which is located about 10 miles north of I-81 Exit 35 (Chilhowie exit) via state Rte. 107. The collection system was constructed in the early 1970’s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

880 Residential Customers

61 Commercial Customers

2 Industrial Customers

4 — Other Municipal Systems 947 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 95% residential and 5% non- residential.

The collection system consists of _6 ” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately __% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately % of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed in__2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the early _1970°s

‘The Government Plant Road area of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

‘The system includes seven pump stations:

McCready Pump Station ~ 176 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the McCready area of Saltville and residents of Smyth County. The McCready area is located on the northeastern side of Saltville along E. Main Street. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main westerly along Main Street about 3,200 LF that empties into an 8” gravity sewer.

Henrytown Pump Station - 78 GPM submersible grinder pump station serving the north end of Henrytown Road. The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line about 2500 LF southeast of pump station adjacent to Henrytown Road.

Farm Road Pump Station — Low flow older pneumatic Pot system that serves the Food Country center, the Wellness Center, and other downtown buildings. ‘The pump station discharges through a 4” force main that travels about 1000 LF and empties into a 8” gravity sewer line near the intersection of Palmer Avenue and Panther Lane.
Government Plant Road Pump Station ~ 350 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives flow McCready sewer pump station and gravity sewer lines from the southeastern side of Saltville. The pump station discharges through a 8” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along East Main Street about 3,600 LF southeast of the pump station,
Plasterco Pump Station ~ 200 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives flow from the southwestern portion of Saltville, including W. Main Street, Old Quarry Road and Edgemont Subdivision, located on the east side of Worthy Blvd (Rte 107). ‘The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that runs around 2700 LF along Main Street, where it empties into an 8” gravity sewer that flows to Rte. 91 Pump Station,

Rte. 91 Pump Station — 250 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives flow Plasterco and Henrytown sewer pump stations plus 8”gravity lines to the east and west along Main Street. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that travels along East Main about 3,000 LF that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line.

• Rte. 634/Headworks Pump Station – 350 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collections system. The pump station discharges through a 10” force main that takes flow to the WWTP.

The system also collects flow from bordering Smyth County customers from the Allison Gap subsystem.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Town of Saltville sewer system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Saltville WWTP (VPDES Permit #0026808).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system (Town and Smyth County) are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows (including flow from Smyth County Allison Gap subsystem) for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 11,501,000 2,342,252 20.4% February 16,436,000 2,196,651 13.4% March 18,383,000 1,991,443 10.8% April 12,720,000 2,257,029 17.7% May 8,060,000 2,288,538 28.4% June 7,140,000 2,264,483 31.7% July 7,161,000 2,541,367 35.5% August 7,998,000 2,357,332 29.5% September 6,990,000 2,251,788 32.2% October 8,928,000 2,234,545 25.0% November 7,020,000 2,598,066 37.0% December 7,750,000 2,132,799 27.5% Monthly Average 10,007,250 2,288,024 22.9% Daily Average 329,005 75,223 22.9% Avg / Customer 359 82

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Saltville collection system had 12 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. The overflows were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow (4), manhole blockage with debris (2), and equipment failure (6).

• The system has had approximately 25 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of infiltration and inflow, manhole blockages, and equipment failures.

• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Frequent issues with pump stations maintenance.

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES was performed on the Town’s sewer system in 2022 by The Lane Group. The study region included areas draining to the Government Plant Road Pump Station. The SSES identified $_1.3 million of recommended system rehabilitation projects. The project is scheduled to be funded by VDEQ.

Rte, 634/Headworks Pump Station — 350 GPM suction lift sewage pump station that receives all flow from this collections system. The pump station discharges through a 10” force main that takes flow to the WWTP.

The system also collects flow from bordering Smyth County customers from the Allison Gap subsystem.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Town of Saltville sewer system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Saltville WWTP (VPDES Permit #0026808).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system (Town and Smyth County) are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows (including flow from Smyth County Allison Gap subsystem) for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 11,501,000 2,342,252 20.4% February 16,436,000 2,196,651 13.4% March 18,383,000 1,991,443 10.8% April 12,720,000 2,257,029 11.7% May 8,060,000 2,288,538 28.4% June 7,140,000 2,264,483 31.7% July 7,161,000 2,541,367 35.5% August 7,998,000 2,397,332 29.5% September 6,990,000 2,251,788 32.2% October 8,928,000 2,234,545 25.0% November 7,020,000 2,598,066 37.0% December 7,750,000 2,132,799 27.5% Monthly Average 10,007,250 2,288,024 22.9% Daily Average 329,005 75,223 22.9% Avg / Customer 359 82

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Saltville collection system had 12 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. The overflows were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow (4), manhole blockage with debris (2), and ‘equipment failure (6).

The system has had approximately 25 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of infiltration and inflow, manhole blockages, and equipment failures.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

‘© Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation, Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently does not have a CIP adopted.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in 2022 as part of the SSES.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rate - Residential
In-Town Out of Town

0-3,000 gallons $32.53 $58.63
3,001 and over gallons

$9.30 per 1,000 gal $14.52 per 1,000 gal

Sewer Rate - Commercial
In-Town Out of Town

0-3,000 gallons $51.12 $77.12
3,001 and over gallons

$12.78 per 1,000 gal $16.27 per 1,000 gal

Values for 0-3000 gallons are the Minimum Bill

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $___$6.9 million. (see Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects)

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $1,366,091 in outstanding loan.

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2021

1 Rural Development 2044 233,423

2 Rural Development 2044 77,808

3 Rural Development 2044 310,114

4 VRA 2030 744,746 (as of 11/22)

Capital Improvements Plan The system currently does not have a CIP adopted,

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by The Lane Group in 2022 as part of the SSES. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

‘Sewer Rate - Residential

In-Town Out of Town 0-3,000 gallons $32.53 $58.63

3,001 and over

gallons 39.30 per 1,000 gal $14.52 per 1,000 gal

Sewer Rate - Commercial In-Town Out of Town

0-3,000 gallons $51.12 $77.12

3,001 and over

gallons $12.78 per 1,000 gal $16.27 per 1,000 gal

Values for 0-3000 gallons are the Minimum Bill

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — The opinion of probable cost for the identified system improvements is $__$6.9 million. (see Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects)

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $1,366,091 in outstanding loan,

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2021 1 Rural Development 2044 233,423, 2 Rural Development 2044 77,808 3 Rural Development 2044 310,114 4 VRA 2030 744,746 (as of 11/22)

SALTVILLE WWTP – VPDES PERMIT #0026808 TOWN OF SALTVILLE, FACILITY OWNER MOUNT ROGERS PDC

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 336 Allison Gap Road (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1971. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2003_ and involved construction of an aeration basin, 2 clarifiers, 3 digesters, a flow control building and UV lighting . The facility utilizes __activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Saltville and residents of Smyth County in close proximity to the town limits. collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is ___0.99 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was ___0.3 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was ___0.53 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 8_days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to North Fork Holston River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at Ecoh Safe Landfill by Republic Services.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by __EMS, Inc. Currently, 2 full time and 1 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 1 Class 2, 1 Class 3, and 1 Class 4. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day M-F and 4 hours/day S-S.

Permit Violations – The facility has had approximately 40 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were primarily the result of manhole overflows during periods of heavy rain.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Aging mechanical mixers need to be replaced by diffusers  Aging UV light system needs upgrade  Concrete wall deterioration needs repairs  Aging headworks needs upgrade

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 App. $800,000 needed to upgrade headworks; proposed project funded by USDA RD

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $_6.9 million. (see Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects)

SALTVILLE WWTP — VPDES PERMIT #0026808 TOWN OF SALTVILLE, FACILITY OWNER MOUNT ROGERS PDC

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 336 Allison Gap Road (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1971. The last major upgrade/expansion ‘was completed in 2003 and involved construction of an aeration basin, 2 clarifiers, 3 digesters, a flow control building and UV lighting . The facility utilizes _activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment,

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Saltville and residents of Smyth County in close proximity to the town limits. collection system(s). The facility does receive and ‘reat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 9 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was __0.3 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was __0.53 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for _8 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to _North Fork Holston River . Sludge from the facility is disposed of at Ecoh Safe Landfill by Republic Services.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by EMS, Inc. Currently, 2 full time and_1 part time licensed operators work at the facility. _1 Class 2, 1. Class 3, and_1 Class 4, The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day M-F and 4 hours/day S-S,

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had approximately 40 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were primarily the result of manhole overflows during periods of heavy rain.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Aging mechanical mixers need to be replaced by diffusers Aging UV light system needs upgrade Concrete wall deterioration needs repairs

Aging headworks needs upgrade

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

App. $800,000 needed to upgrade headworks; proposed project funded by USDA RD

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the

identified facility improvements is $_6.9 million. (see Questions Pertaining to Potential Future Projects)

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

SA LT

VI LL

E W

AS TE

W AT

ER SY

ST EM

[Ú

TPWW

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend TPWW WWTP

[Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Force Main

Gravity Main

Smyth County Gravity Main

Smyth County Manhole

Town Boundary

Plasterco Pump Station

Rte. 91 Pump Station

Henrytown Pump Station

Farm Rd Pump Station

Rte. 634/Headworks Pump Station

Government Plant Rd Pump Station

McCready Pump Station

Smyth County - Allison Gap Wastewater System

‘Smyth County = Alison Gap Wastewater System

oe” THenrytown Pump Station

Rte. 91 Pump Station

Plasterco A Pump Station 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

Se Feet

Rte, 634/Headworks

Pump Station

‘Government Plant Ra Pump Station

Farm Rd Pump Station

McCready Pump Station

Legend

El wwtp Pump Station @ Manhole

==> Force Main

— Gravity Main

—— Smyth County Gravity Main © Smyth County Manhole

‘Town Boundary

"USGS. The national Map: National. Soundstgs Dataset, 30EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information Stem, National Hydrography Ostet, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Globaleoeystems US. Census Bureau TIGE/Lie dts USFS Rood Data; Natural arth Oats US, Department of Sate Humanitarian Information Units and NOAA National Centers fr Enronmentalnormation, US Coastal Rel! Mosel Oat refreshed lune, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SALTVILLE WASTEWATER SYSTEM

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM
SMYTH COUNTY – ADWOLFE SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Smyth County collection system serves multiple communities. Wastewater is collected in small subsystems bordering the towns of Marion, Saltville and Chilhowie where it ultimately flows into each town’s wastewater plant. The systems will be discussed by individual subsystem.

• Adwolfe Subsystem – collection system in Adwolfe Community adjacent to Hall Addition, about 3.5 miles southwest of Marion, located near the I-81 Exit 44. The collection system was constructed in 2018.
The system serves approximately 36 residential customers and 34 commercial customers

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

36 Residential Customers 10 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers

24 Other Municipal Systems 70 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 50% residential and 50% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0_% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in __2018. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2018.

The system includes four pump stations: All DETAILS Not Updated on Pump Stations

• Exit 39 Pump Station – ?? GPM duplex suction lift pump station serving the southwest side of Marion near the South Main Street/ Washington Avenue intersection. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line east on Lee Highway.

• I81 Crossing/Dip Dog Pump Station – ?? GPM duplex suction lift pump station serving the north side of the Route 52/ Blue Ridge Parkway intersection. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along Route 52.

• Oak Point Elementary School Pump Station – 30 GPM simplex grinder sewage pump station serving hat receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near the Carroll County Industrial Park at I-77 Exit 14. The receiving sewer system is part of the Carroll County PSA’s Gladeville/ Cranberry Sewer System.

• Rolling Hills Drive Pump Station – 5900 GPM Triplex submersible pump station pumping into WWTP.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM SMYTH COUNTY - ADWOLFE SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Smyth County collection system serves multiple communities. Wastewater is collected in small subsystems bordering the towns of Marion, Saltville and Chilhowie where it ultimately flows into each town’s wastewater plant. The systems will be discussed by individual subsystem.

Adwolfe Subsystem ~ collection system in Adwolfe Community adjacent to Hall Addition, about 3.5 miles southwest of Marion, located near the I-81 Exit 44. The collection system was constructed in 2018. The system serves approximately 36 residential customers and 34 commercial customers

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

36 Residential Customers 10 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers

24 Other Municipal Systems 70 Total Number of Customers

The system’ residential.

customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 50% residential and 50% non-

The collection system consists of 8” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0_% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in__2018 . The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2018.

The system includes four pump stations: All DETAILS Not Updated on Pump Stations

© Exit 39 Pump Station — 2? Gem duplex suction lift pump station serving the southwest side of Marion near the South Main Street Washington Avenue intersection, The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line east on Lee Highway.

181 Crossing/Dip Dog Pump Station — ?? GPM duplex suction lift pump station serving the north side of the Route $2/ Blue Ridge Parkway intersection. ‘The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along Route 52.

Oak Point Elementary School Pump Station ~ 30 GPM simplex grinder sewage pump station serving hat receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that ‘empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near the Carroll County Industrial Park at I-77 Exit 14. The receiving sewer system is part of the Carroll County PSA’s Gladeville/ Cranberry Sewer System.

‘* Rolling Hills Drive Pump Station — 5900 GPM Triplex submersible pump station pumping into WWTP.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant, Treatment is

ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304),

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meter at the Marion WWTP. The gallons treated are based on an estimated 65% flow from Hall/Cedars and 35% from Adwolfe subsystems. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 565,000 291,400 52% February 630,000 246,600 39% March 653,000 307,000 47% April 336,000 325,000 97% May 172,000 299,000 174% June 196,000 319,000 163% July 197,000 326,000 165% August 292,000 298,000 102% September 191,000 363,000 190% October 262,000 345,000 132% November 175,000 343,000 196% December 151,000 347,000 229% Monthly Average 318,333 132% Daily Average 10,466
Avg / Customer 150

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Adwolfe collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
• The system has had _0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Unknown.

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem.

Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meter at the Marion WWTP. The gallons treated are based on an estimated 65% flow from Hall/Cedars and 35% from Adwolfe subsystems, A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 565,000 291,400 52% February 630,000 246,600 39% March 653,000 307,000 41% April 336,000 325,000 97% May 172,000 299,000 174% June 196,000 319,000 163% July 197,000 326,000 165% August 292,000 298,000 102% September 191,000 363,000 190% October 262,000 345,000 132% November 175,000 343,000 196% December 151,000 347,000 229% Monthly Average 318,333 132% Daily Average 10,466

Avg / Customer 150

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Adwolfe collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. © The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

‘SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem, Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure (see attached) was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill

1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans – Details not updated as of this draft.

The subsystem currently has approximately $ in outstanding loans as of June 22, 2022.

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2022

1 USDA RD 2060

Yearly payment on Loan 1 are $78,492.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure (see attached) was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill 1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

‘Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans ~ Details not updated as of this draft.

‘The subsystem currently has approximately S in outstanding loans as of June 22, 2022. Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2022 1 USDA RD 2060

Yearly payment on Loan 1 are $78,492.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000500

Feet

Legend Force Main

[Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Gravity Main

Chilhowie Gravity Main

Exit 39 Pump Station

Smyth County - Exit 39 Subsystem

Oak Point Elementary School Pump Station

I-81 Crossing/Dip Dog Pump Station

Rolling Hills Drive Pump Station

Smyth County - Adwolfe Subsystem

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

W O

LF E

SU BS

YS TE

Smyth County - Hall Addition Subsystem

Town of Chilhowie Wastewater System

Legend

=> Force Main

"| LB Pump Station ~~

@ Manhole

é ‘Smyth County - 3 — Gravity Main Hall Addition

Se PF yo —— Chilhowie Gravity Main system

Oak Point

Elementary School / {Pump station

‘Town of Chithowie Wastewater System

81 Crossing/Dip Dog Pump Station

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

exit 39 Pump Station

SMYTH COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM -

ADWOLFE SUBSYSTEM

_ [encom

‘Smyth County =

Exit 39 Subsystem Adwolfe Subsystem

Rolling Hills Drive /

Pump Station

CQ. <

ses The National Map: National Soundaries Dataset, 206° Elevation Program, Geographic Names 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 nase ad haters! Tonporaton Ssunt U6s Gel eoysems Us. Cen rene New ets | [P™__ —___ a rect Uses toad Dat Natural Earth Ost, US. Deparment of Sate Humantaranifrmaton Unt and Noma | [STE iar

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM
SMYTH COUNTY – ALLISON GAP SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

• Allison Gap Subsystem – collection system in Allison Gap Community north of Saltville. The collection system was constructed in the early 1970’s. The system serves approximately 113 residential customers and 3 commercial customers

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

113 Residential Customers 1 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers

2 Other Municipal Systems 116 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 99% residential and 1% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 8” through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 1970. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1970’s.

The system includes no pump stations:

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Saltville sewer system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Saltville WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0026808).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 653,500 240,892 37 February 811,930 226,315 28 March 1,016,540 206,500 20 April 443,250 225,098 51 May 368,870 254,455 69 June 313,450 291,539 93 July 387,620 232,968 60 August 470,660 255,045 54 September 503,900 239,340 47 October 387,410 219,986 57 November 268,380 321,625 120 December 428,910 222,973 52 Monthly Average 504,535 244,736 57 Daily Average 16,587 8,046
Avg / Customer 143 70

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM SMYTH COUNTY - ALLISON GAP SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

Allison Gap Subsystem ~ collection system in Allison Gap Community north of Saltville. The collection system was constructed in the early 1970’s. The system serves approximately 113 residential customers and 3 commercial customers

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be: ul

Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems Total Number of Customers

jor}

‘The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 99% residential and 1% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 8” through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0_% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in _1970. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to

have been constructed in the 1970°s.

The system includes no pump stations:

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Saltville sewer system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Saltville WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0026808).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 653,500 240,892 37 February 811,930 226,315 28 March 1,016,540 206,500 20 April 443,250 225,098 51 May 368,870 254,455 9 June 313,450 291,539 93 July 387,620 232,968 60 August 470,660 255,045 54 September 503,900 239,340 47 October 387,410 219,986 37 November 268,380 321,625 120 December 428,910 222,973 52 Monthly Average 504,535 244,736 57 Daily Average 16,587 8,046

Avg / Customer 143 70

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Allison Gap collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
• The system has had _0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Infiltration and Inflow needs.

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem.

Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure (Smyth County) was last modified on July 1, 2022

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill

1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The subsystem currently has no known debt.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Allison Gap collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021 © The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem,

Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure (Smyth County) was last modified on July 1, 2022

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill 1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

‘Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The subsystem currently has no known debt.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

LI SO

N G

AP SU

BS YS

TE M

[Ú

TPWW

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000500

Feet

Legend Gravity Main

Manhole

TPWW Saltville WWTP

[Ú Saltville Pump Station

Saltville Manhole

Saltville Force Main

Saltville Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Smyth County wastewater flows to Town of Saltville WWTP - VPDESD # 0026808

Smyth County - Allison Gap Subsystem

Town of Saltville Wastewater System

Legend

— Gravity Main Manhole

e Hy sattville wwre BH saltville Pump station @ _Saltville Manhole

==* Saltville Force Main

— Saltville Gravity Main Town Boundary

‘Smyth County wastewater flows to Town of Saltvlle \WWTP - VPDESD # 0026808

ee Feet

500

1,000 2,000

‘Smyth County = Allison Gap Subsystem

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY ALLISON GAP SUBSYSTEM

WASTEWATER SYSTEM -

TTown of Saltville Wastewater System

= iy

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM
SMYTH COUNTY – ATKINS SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

• Atkins Subsystem – collection system stretches about 5.5 miles east along Lee Highway (Rte. 11) to the western side of Atkins, located near the I-81 Exit 49. The collection system was constructed in 1980’s.
The system serves approximately 59 residential customers and 26 commercial customers.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

_59 Residential Customers _26 Commercial Customers _____ Industrial Customers ___ _ Other Municipal Systems

85 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings for the second half of 2021 were available at the time of this report. Based on billing data, flows were estimated to be approximately 10% residential and 90% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 8” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0_% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0_% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 2021. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1920’s.

The system includes one pump station:

• Rest Area Pump Station – pump station details were not known at the time of this report.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 5,296,840 % February 8,747,910 % March 3,020,280 % April 4,051,020 % May 5,844,770 % June 3,788,890 1,444,960 38% July 5,871,780 1,784,937 30% August 5,992,000 1,793,180 30% September 5,795,830 1,875,398 32% October 5,521,550 1,694,394 31% November 4,873,390 1,608,828 34% December 4,806,760 2,044,671 43% Monthly Average 5,300,918 34% Daily Average 174,277
Avg / Customer 2,050

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM SMYTH COUNTY - ATKINS SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

Atkins Subsystem ~ collection system stretches about 5.5 miles east along Lee Highway (Rte. 11) to the western side of Atkins, located near the I-81 Exit 49. The collection system was constructed in 1980’s. The system serves approximately 59 residential customers and 26 commercial customers.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

59_ Residential Customers 26_ Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems 85 Total Number of Customers.

The system’s customer billings for the second half of 2021 were available at the time of this report. Based on ing data, flows were estimated to be approximately 10% residential and 90% non-residential

The collection system consists of 8” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0 % of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed in__ 2021 _. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the _1920

The system includes one pump station:

Rest Area Pump Station ~ pump station details were not known at the time of this report.

lant, Treatment is

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Wastewater Treatment ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #0086304)

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on meters at the WWTP. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 5,296,840 % February 8,747,910 % Mareh 3,020,280 % April 4,051,020 % May 5,844,770 %

June 3,788,890 1,444,960 38% July 5,871,780 1,784,937 30% August 5,992,000 1,793,180 30% September 5,795,830 1,875,398 32% October 5,521,550 1,694,394 31% November 4,873,390 1,608,828 34% December 4,806,760 2,044,671 43% Monthly Average 5,300,918 34% Daily Average 174,277

Avg / Customer 2,050

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Atkins collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.
• The system has had _0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Infiltration and Inflow needs.

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem.

Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.
Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill

1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The subsystem currently has no known debt.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Atkins collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021
The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years. © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem. Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP,

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022. Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill 1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

‘Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — No projects are currently planned for the subsystem,

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Lo: The subsystem currently has no known debt,

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

[Ú¯

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Force Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Marion Gravity Main

Marion Manhole

Town Boundary

Rest Area Pump Station

Smyth County - Atkins Subsystem

Town of Marion Wastewater System

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

KI N

S SU

BS YS

TE M

Legend

[Pump Station

=> Force Main

@ Manhole

— Gravity Main

—— Marion Gravity Main @ Marion Manhole

Town Boundary -

Town of Marion Wastewater System

‘Smyth County ‘Atkins Subsystem

y 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000

8,000 10,000

y Se ee fect

Rest Area Pump Station

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY

WASTEWATER SYSTEM - ATKINS SUBSYSTEM

= i

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names

Information System, National Hyérography Dataset, National Land Cover Oatabase, Natonsl Structures - Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; | [ox P= USFS Road Date: Natural Earth Oat: US. Deparment of State Humntaron Information Unt; and NOxA | [FST —— oe

"atonal Center for Environmental normal, US. Coastal Rel! Model Data rareshed lve, 2022

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM
SMYTH COUNTY – HALL ADDITION/CEDARS SUBSYSTEM
Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

• Hall Addition – collection system stretches about 1.5 miles in length along Lee Highway (Rte.11) about 1.5 to 3 miles southwest of Marion, located near the I-81 Exit 44. The collection system was constructed in 2006 with additions completed in 2011. We are including data for the Cedars subsystem (data collected from Town of Marion). The system serves approximately 195 residential customers and 16 commercial customers.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

195 Residential Customers 7 Commercial Customers 0 Industrial Customers 9 Other Municipal Systems

211 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 8” through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0_% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0_% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in _2011. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2006.

The system includes four pump stations: All DETAILS Not Updated on Pump Stations

• Hall Addition/Cedars Pump Station 1 – 21 GPM grinder sewage pump station

• Hall Addition/Cedars Pump Station 2 – 280 GPM duplex grinder pump station serving the south side of Lee Higway near Sapwood Drive. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along

• Hall Addition Phase II Pump Station – 25 GPM duplex grinder sewage pump station serving that receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near .

• Hall Addition/Cedars Pump Station 3 – 42 GPM duplex grinder pump station pumping into

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM SMYTH COUNTY - HALL ADDITION/CEDARS SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

Hall Addition ~ collection system stretches about 1.5 miles in length along Lee Highway (Rte.11) about 1.5 to 3 miles southwest of Marion, located near the I-81 Exit 44. The collection system was constructed in 2006 with additions completed in 2011. We are including data for the Cedars subsystem (data collected from Town of Marion). ‘The system serves approximately 195 residential customers and 16 commercial customers.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

195 Residential Customers Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems 1 Total Number of Customers

Bron

‘The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were e: residential.

ated to be approximately 90% residential and 10% non-

‘The collection system consists of 8 through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0 % of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. ‘The newest area of the system was constructed in__2011__. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 2006.

The system includes four pump stations: All DETAILS Not Updated on Pump Stations

Hall Addition/Cedars Pump Station | - 21 GPM grinder sewage pump station
Hall Addition/Cedars Pump Station 2 ~ 280 Gro duplex grinder pump station serving the south side of Lee Higway near Sapwood Drive. The pump station discharges through a 2” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line along
Hall Addition Phase II Pump Station ~25 GPM duplex grinder sewage pump station serving. that receives all flow from this collection system. The pump station discharges through a 6” force main that empties into an 8” gravity sewer line located near

«Hall Addition/Cedars Pump Station 3 ~ 42 GrM duplex grinder pump station pumping into

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant, Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,049,000 527,000 50% February 1,170,000 471,000 40% March 1,214,000 491.000 40% April 623,000 482,000 77% May 320,000 492,000 154% June 364,000 514,000 141% July 366,000 691,000 189% August 542,000 551,000 102% September 354,000 589,000 166% October 488,000 489,000 100% November 325,000 476,000 146% December 281,000 501,000 178% Monthly Average 591,333 115% Daily Average 19,441
Avg / Customer 92

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Hall Addition collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

• The system has had _0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Unknown.

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem.

Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,049,000 527,000 50% February 1,170,000 471,000 40% March 1,214,000 491.000 40% April 623,000 482, 1% May 320,000 492 154% June 364,000 514,000 141% July 366,000 691,000 139% August 542,000 351,000 102% September 354,000 589,000 166% October 488,000 489,000 100% November 325,000 476,000 146% December 281,000 501,000 178% Monthly Average 591,333 115% Daily Average 19,441 Avg / Customer 2

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The system has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

«The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance, The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

‘SSES A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem, Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill

1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans - Details not updated as of this draft.

The subsystem currently has approximately $ in outstanding loans as of June 22, 2022.

Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2022

1 USDA RD 2047

Yearly payment on Loan 1 are $68,940.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill 1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

‘Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans - Details not updated as of this draft.

‘The subsystem currently has approximately $ __in outstanding loans as of June 22, 2022. Loan Borrower/Placement Maturity Date Balance as of June 30, 2022 1 USDA RD 2047

Yearly payment on Loan 1 are $68,940.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000500

Feet

Legend Force Main

[Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Gravity Main

Marion Manhole

Marion Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Hall Addition Phase II Pump Station

Hall Addition/Cedars Community Pump Station 2

Hall Addition/Cedars Community Pump Station 1

Town of Marion Wastewater System

Hall Addition/Cedars Community Pump Station 3

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

AL L

AD D

IT IO

N SU

BS YS

TE M

Smyth County - Adwolfe Subsystem

Smyth County - Hall Addition Subsystem

Legend 2 Force Main [Pump Station @ = Manhole — Gravity Main @ = Marion Manhole —— Marion Gravity Main

‘Town Boundary

‘Smyth County ‘Adwwolfe Subsystem

{it

Metts

Hall Addition Phase IL Pump Station

500

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

Feet

Hall Addition/Cedars, ‘Community Pump Station 3

‘Smyth County - Hall Addition Subsystem

“Town of Marion Wastewater System

Hall Addition/Cedars ‘Community Pump Station 1

Hall Addition/Cedars Community Pump Station 2

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 20EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Informaton system, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Nabonal Structures Dataset, and Navona Transporation Dataeet; USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census urea TIGER/Une dts USS Road Data; Natural Fath Data: US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Unt and NORA

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY

WASTEWATER SYSTEM - HALL ADDITION SUBSYSTEM

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM
SMYTH COUNTY – HUNGRY MOTHER SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

• Hungry Mother Subsystem – collection system stretches about 1.5 miles in length along Rte. 16 north of
Marion to approximately Hungry Mother Lake. Marion is located near the I-81 Exit 45. The collection system was constructed in 1990’s. The system serves approximately 200 residential customers and 5 commercial customers.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

200 Residential Customers 1 Commercial Customers _____ Industrial Customers 4 Other Municipal Systems 205 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings for the second half of 2021 were available at the time of this report. Based on billing data, flows were estimated to be approximately 35% residential and 65% non-residential (includes Hungry Mother Park flow).

The collection system consists of 8” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0_% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 2021. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1920’s.

The system includes zero pump stations:

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on water usage of customers in the Hungry Mother subsystem. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is currently not available.

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,771,200
February 1,649,890
March 1,821,337
April 1,699,690
May 1,576,530
June 2,008,890 698,230 35% July 1,897,023 734,000 39% August 1,775,360 680,610 38% September 1,677,530 658,880 39% October 1,564,467 638,620 41% November 1,622,590 700,410 43% December 1,790,200 603,520 34% Monthly Average 1,737,892 38% Daily Average 57,136
Avg / Customer 279

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM SMYTH COUNTY - HUNGRY MOTHER SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

Hungry Mother Subsystem ~ collection system stretches about 1.5 miles in length along Rte. 16 north of Marion to approximately Hungry Mother Lake. Marion is located near the I-81 Exit 45. The collection system was constructed in 1990’s. The system serves approximately 200 residential customers and 5 ‘commercial customers.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

200_ Residential Customers 1 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

4 Other Municipal Systems 205 Total Number of Customers

The collection system consists of 8” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or conerete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick.

The newest area of the system was constructed in _2021. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the _1920°s.

The system includes zero pump stations:

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant, Treatment is

ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304),

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,771,200

February 1,649,890

March 1,821,337

April 1,699,690

May 1,576,530

June 2,008,890 698,230 35% July 1,897,023 734,000 39% August 1,775,360 680,610 38% September 1,677,530 658,880 39% October 1,564,467 638,620 A1% November 1,622,590 700,410 43% December 1,790,200 603,520 34% Monthly Average 1,737,892 38% Daily Average 57,136

Avg / Customer 279

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The Hungry Mother collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021.

• The system has had _0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Infiltration and Inflow needs.

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem.

Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill

1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The subsystem currently has no known debt.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Hungry Mother collection subsystem had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year

The system has had _0_permit violations over the past 2 years.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System Infiltration and Inflow needs.

System Needs Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem. Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022.

Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill 1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

‘Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Nec subsystem,

‘sary System Improvements ~ No projects are currently planned for the

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘The subsystem currently has no known debt.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

[Ú

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Gravity Main

Marion Gravity Main

Marion Manhole

Town Boundary

Smyth County - Hungry Mother Subsystem

Town of Marion Wastewater System

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

U N

G R Y

M O

TH ER

SU BS

YS TE

Smyth County - Hall Addition Subsystem

Smyth County - Staley Creek Subsystem

Legend [5 Pump Station @ Manhole —= Gravity Main | — Marion Gravity Main

@ Marion Manhole ~ . 3.7.7! Town Boundary . Smyth County = Ma Hall Adction Subsystem 01,000 2,000 4,000 6,000

a =

‘Smyth County Hungry Mother Subsystem

Navona Conte

1084, Natal Map: Natonal Bouflariés Ome. 0c eaNe Mec

informaton Systems National Hyography Oats, Natal Land Cover Ocoee, Neate Suc

§ stat and National Transportation Dataset USGS Global Ecosfstens US. Cnsus Bureau TGER/Uneg Se a: tu ah Ot pret of ete Hantoran eration Un an Ng

“Town of Marion Wastewater System

‘Smyth County = Staley Creek Subsystem

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY

WASTEWATER SYSTEM - HUNGRY MOTHER: SUBSYSTEM

or utenmentl information, US. Coastal Ree Mode Data relreshed lune, 2027

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM
SMYTH COUNTY – STALEY CREEK SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

• Staley Creek Subsystem – collection system stretches about 2.3 miles south of Marion along Rte. 16, located near the I-81 Exit 45. The collection system was constructed in 1993. The system serves approximately 73 residential customers and 9 commercial customers

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

_73 Residential Customers 6 Commercial Customers _____ Industrial Customers 3 Other Municipal Systems

82 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings for the second half of 2021 were available at the time of this report. Based on billing data, flows were estimated to be approximately 85% residential and 15% non-residential.

The collection system consists of 8” through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick.
The newest area of the system was constructed in 1993. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1990’s.

The system includes zero pump stations:

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

System Flows - Flows for the collection system are estimated based on a meter where the Staley Creek subsystem connects to the Town of Marion sewer system. A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 3,305,840
February 3,445,478
March 3,793,266
April 3,181,457
May 2,606,389
June 2,304,448 184,180 8% July 2,368,860 207,360 9% August 2,398,337 220,290 9% September 2,266,053 208,660 9% October 2,393,880 201,360 8% November 2,122,527 226,990 11% December 2,230,413 178,740 8% Monthly Average 2,701,412 9% Daily Average 88,813
Avg / Customer 1,083

SMYTH COUNTY COLLECTION SYSTEM SMYTH COUNTY - STALEY CREEK SUBSYSTEM Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

Staley Creek Subsystem ~ collection system stretches about 2.3 miles south of Marion along Rte. 16, located near the I-81 Exit 45. The collection system was constructed in 1993. The system serves approximately 73 residential customers and 9 commercial customers

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

73_ Residential Customers 6 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

3 Other Municipal Systems 82 Total Number of Customers

The collection system consists of 8” through 10” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 0% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately 0% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in _1993. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to

have been constructed in the 1990°s.

The system includes zero pump stations:

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the _Town of Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant, Treatment is ultimately provided at the Town of Marion WWTP (VPDES Permit #_0086304).

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 3,305,840

February 3,445,478

March 3,793,266

April 3,181,457

May 2,606,389

June 2,304,448 184,180 8%

July 2,368,860 207,360 9% August 2,398,337 220,290 9% September 2,266,053 208,660 9% October 2,393,880 201,360 8% November 2,122,527 226,990 11% December 2,230,413 178,740 8% Monthly Average 2,701,412 9% Daily Average 88,813

Avg / Customer 1,083

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

• The system has had _0 permit violations over the past 2 years.
• The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

• Infiltration and Inflow needs

System Needs

• Infiltration and inflow identification and remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

SSES

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem.

Capital Improvements Plan

The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022 Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill

1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill

4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements – No projects are currently planned for the subsystem.

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The subsystem currently has no known debt.

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The Town of Marion collection system had 0 reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021 The last overflow of record was in November 2020, The overflow occurred during heavy rains and were thought to be due to high inflow.
The system has had_0_permit violations over the past 2 years.
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance, The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

A SSES has not been performed on the subsystem,

Capital Improvements Plan The subsystem does not have a CIP.

Asset Management Plan

The subsystem does not have an asset management plan. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified on July 1, 2022 Sewer Rate - Residential

0-1,000 gallons $23.29 minimum bill 1,001 to 6,000 gallons $10.09 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons Residential Flat Rate $51.54 per month

Sewer Rate - Commercial

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

‘Sewer Rate - Industrial and Industrial Enterprise

0-4,000 gallons $54.32 minimum bill 4,001 and over $12.42 per 1,000 gallons

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary System Improvements — No projects are currently planned for the subsystem,

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The subsystem currently has no known debt.

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000500

Feet

Legend Marion Manhole

Marion Gravity Main

Manhole

Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Town of Marion Wastewater System

Smyth County - Staley Creek Subsystem

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

AL EY

C R EE

K SU

BS YS

TE M

“Town of Marion Wastewater System

‘Smyth County - Staley Creek Subsystem

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 SS ee Feet

Legend @ = Marion Manhole —— Marion Gravity Main @ = Manhole — Gravity Main

jown Boundary

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 20EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Oataset, National Land Cover Oatabase, Natonal Structures Dataset, and Nationa ansportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census @ureay TIGER/Une dts USFS Road Data; Natural Fath Dat; US. Deparment of State Humantaran Information Unit and NORA National Centers fr endronmetalnermation, US Coastal Rel! Model, Data elfeshed lune, 2022

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - STALEY CREEK SUBSYSTEM

= IN

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

L /

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000500

Feet

Legend Manhole

Gravity Main

Chilhowie Manholes

Chilhowie Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Smyth County- WL Wastewater System

Town of Chilhowie Wastewater System

Legend

@ Manhole — Gravity Main

@ Chilhowie Manholes =e Chilhowie Gravity Main

fown Boundary

‘Smyth County- WL. ag

Wastewater System

0 500 1,000 2,000

3,000 4,000 5,000

a = SS ee fect ’

‘Town of Chithowie Wastewater System

Information ys Dataset, and Natl

ss meee, nah!

fn Infogrtion Unt and NORA

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY WASTEWATER SYSTEM - WL

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

11/10/2022

IJR

2248

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

W AS

TE W

AT ER

S YS

TE M

R EE

N H

IL L

AN D

SH U

LE R S

U BS

YS TE

M /

[Ú

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000500

Feet

Legend [Ú Pump Station

Manhole

Gravity Main

Chilhowie Manholes

Chilhowie Gravity Main

Chilhowie Force Main

Town Boundary

Greenhill and Shuler Hollow Sewer Extension Pump Station

Smyth County

Greenhill and Shuler Hollow Subsystem

Town of Chilhowie Wastewater System

Town of Chthowle Wastewater System

‘Smyth County ~ Greenhill and Shuler Hollow Subsystem

Greenhill and Shuler Hollow Sewer Extension Pump Station

0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 ee Feet

Legend

[i Pump Station @ Manhole

— Gravity Main

Town Boundary

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 20EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, Nabonal Structures Dataset, and Nationa Transporation Daaeet; USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureay TIGER/Lne dts LSS Road Data; Natural Fath Oat: US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Infrmation Unt and NORA

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY

WASTEWATER SYSTEM - GREEN HILL AND SHULER SUBSYSTEM

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY BVU AREA OF LEE HIGHWAY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Washington County Service Authority BVU area of Lee Highway sewer system is located in Washington County southwest of the Town of Abingdon.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

387 Residential Customers 42 Commercial Customers 429 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 67% residential and 33% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 16” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 100% of the system consists of PVC and approximately 100% of the manholes are precast concrete. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2000.

The Industrial Park and Force Mains of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes fourteen pump stations:  Eagle Ridge: 49 gpm lift station located at 16130 Old Jonesboro Road. The pump station discharges to a

3 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 13: 35 gpm lift station located at 14485 Long Hole Ridge. The pump station discharges to a 2

inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 12: 174 gpm lift station located at 20012 Washing Way. The pump station discharges to a 6 inch

force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 7: 41 gpm lift station located at 15057 Spring View Ridge. The pump station discharges to a 2

inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 5: 104 gpm lift station located at 14847 Washington Way. The pump station discharges to a 4

inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 6: 24 gpm lift station located at 14842 Spring View Ridge. The pump station discharges to a 4

inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 4: 100 gpm lift station located at 15036 Washing Way. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch

force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 2: 220 gpm lift station located at 15125 Highlands Trail. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch

force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.
 Virginia 1: 150 gpm lift station located at 14485 Long Hole Ridge. The pump station discharges to a 4

inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 3: 46 gpm lift station located at 23008 Virginia Trail. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch

force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 11: 79 gpm lift station located at Colleton Court 22468 VA Trail. The pump station discharges

to a 2 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.  Virginia 10: 92 gpm lift station located at 22704 Virginia Trail. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch

force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.  Greenbriar: 276 gpm lift station located at 1631 Lee Highway. The pump station discharges to a 6 inch

force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.  Wyndale: 114 gpm lift station located at 18369 Fortunes Way. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch

force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the BVU Collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the BVU Treatment Plant.

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY BVU AREA OF LEE HIGHWAY

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description — The Washington County Service Authority BVU area of Lee Highway sewer system is located in Washington County southwest of the Town of Abingdon.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

387 Residential Customers 42 Commercial Customers 429 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 67% residential and 33% non- residential.

‘The collection system consists of 4” through 16” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 100% of the system consists of PVC and approximately 100% of the manholes are precast concrete. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2000.

‘The Industrial Park and Force Mains of the system experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes fourteen pump stations:

Eagle Ridge: 49 gpm lift station located at 16130 Old Jonesboro Road. The pump station discharges to a 3 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line. © Virginia 13: 35 gpm lift station located at 14485 Long Hole Ridge. The pump station discharges to a 2 inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line.
Virginia 12: 174 gpm lift station located at 20012 Washing Way. The pump station discharges to a 6 inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line © Virginia 7: 41 gpm lift station located at 15057 Spring View Ridge. The pump station discharges to a 2 inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line. © Virginia 5: 104 gpm lift station located at 14847 Washington Way. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line. © Virginia 6: 24 gpm lift station located at 14842 Spring View Ridge. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line. nia 4: 100 gpm lift station located at 15036 Washing Way. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line © Virginia 2: 220 gpm lift station located at 15125 Highlands Trail. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line irginia 1: 150 gpm lift station located at 14485 Long Hole Ridge. The pump station dis ich force main and empties to an 8 inch gravity line. © Virginia 3: 46 gpm lift station located at 23008 Virginia Trail. ‘The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line. nia 11: 79 gpm lift station located at Colleton Court 22468 VA Trail. The pump station discharges to a2 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.
Virginia 10: 92 gpm lift station located at 22704 Virginia Trail. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line. © Greenbriar: 276 gpm lift station located at 1631 Lee Highway. The pump station discharges to a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.
Wyndale: 114 gpm lift station located at 18369 Fortunes Way. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

charges to a 4

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the BVU Collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the BVU Treatment Plant.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 5,349,100 2,808,561 53%

February 7,176,200 2,068,768 29%

March 9,782,000 1,992,072 20%

April 5,356,600 2,596,685 48%

May 3,755,600 2,368,142 63%

June 0 3,768,256 N/A

July 2,995,700 2,905,935 97%

August 3,917,800 2,688,657 69%

September 3,169,150 3,016,117 95%

October 3,700,800 4,068,093 110%

November 3,312,100 2,810,413 85%

December 2,773,500 2,634,955 95%

Monthly Average 4,274,046 2,810,555 66%

Daily Average 140,517 92,402 66%

Avg / Customer 328 215

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Pump station sizing,  I&I,  Industrial discharge.

System Needs

 Line rehabilitation,  Pump station rehabilitation,  Manhole rehabilitation,  I&I remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan

Areas for improvements are known and are in the process of receiving funding.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 5,349,100 2,808,561 53% February 7,176,200 2,068,768 29% March 9,782,000 1,992,072 20% April 5,356,600 2,596,685 48% May 3,755,600 2,368,142 63% June 0 3,768,256 NIA July 2,995,700 2,905,935 97% August 3,917,800 2,688,657 69% September 3,169,150 3,016,117 95% October 3,700,800 4,068,093 110% November 3,312,100 2,810,413 85% December 2,773,500 2,634,955 95% Monthly Average 4,274,046 2,810,555 66% Daily Average 140,517 92,402 66% Avg / Customer 328 25

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years. © The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

18, Industrial discharge.

System Needs

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance d as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan Areas for improvements are known and are in the process of receiving funding,

\ddress private side issues such

Asset Management Plan

‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

Residential

$31.74 Base Rate

$9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons

Commercial/Industrial

$31.74 Base Rate

$11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan.

Residential $31.74 Base Rate $9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons ‘Commercial/Industrial $31.74 Base Rate $11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan,

Legend

1B system Pump Station © Manhole — Gravity Main

=. Force Main

Virginia #7

Virginia #12

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 a Feet

Virginia #5

Virginia #6

Virginia #4

USGS The National Map! National Boundapés Dataset, 3DEP Elevatioty Program, Geographic Names Information Stem, National Hydrography Dataset, National land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset USGS Global Ecosystems U.S. Censtis Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; US. Departimentof State Hurlanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers

#13

Virginia #10

Virginia #11 Eagle Ridge Pump Station, Z 7 Virginia #3 ms Virginia #1 ~ Virginia #2 : ~

for Environmental information, US. Coastal Reliéf Medel, Data refreshed June, 2022.

euitton J

THOMPSON

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY - BVU LEE HIGHWAY

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY DAMASCUS (VA0021130) Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Washington County Service Authority Damascus sewer system is located southeast of the Town of Abingdon. The collection system was constructed in the 1975.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

420 Residential Customers 70 Commercial Customers 490 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 78% residential and 22% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 16” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately <5% of the system consists of terra cotta or concrete lines and approximately <1% brick masonry manholes. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2009. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1980s.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 5,690,000 3,207,914 56%

February 7,740,000 2,362,928 31%

March 10,090,000 2,275,327 23%

April 6,110,000 2,965,910 49%

May 3,880,000 2,704,871 70%

June 3,270,000 4,304,068 132%

July 4,110,000 3,319,133 81%

August 3,480,000 3,070,960 88%

September 3,140,000 3,444,982 110%

October 3,790,000 4,646,540 123%

November 2,730,000 3,210,029 118%

December 2,710,000 3,009,622 111%

Monthly Average 4,728,333 3,210,190 68%

Daily Average 159,382 108,209 68%

Avg / Customer 325 221

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The system has had 4 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of dissolved oxygen violations due to excessive rainfall.

 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Replacement of the clarifier chain,  Replacement of shear pin,  The dissolved oxygen sensors need replacement,  The diffusers need to be replaced.

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY DAMASCUS (VA0021130)

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Washington County Service Authority Damascus sewer system is located southeast of the Town of Abingdon, The collection system was constructed in the 1975.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

420 Residential Customers 70 Commercial Customers 490 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 78% residential and 22% non- residential.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 5,690,000 3,207,914 56% February 7,740,000 2,362,928 31% March 10,090,000 2,275,327 23% April 6,110,000 2,965,910 49% May 3,880,000 2,704,871 70% June 3,270,000 4,304,068 132% July 4,110,000 3,319,133, 81% August 3,480,000 3,070,960 88% September 3,140,000 3,444,982 110% October 3,790,000 4,646,540 123% November 2,730,000 3,210,029 118% December 2,710,000 3,009,622 111% Monthly Average 4,728,333 3,210,190 68% Daily Average 159,382 108,209 68% Avg / Customer 325 221

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The system has had 4 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of dissolved oxygen violations due to excessive rainfall

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Replacement of the clarifier chain, Replacement of shear pin, The dissolved oxygen sensors need replacement,

System Needs

 Line rehabilitation,  Manhole rehabilitation,  I&I remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan –

Areas for improvements are known and are in the process of receiving funding.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

Residential

$31.74 Base Rate

$9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons

Commercial/Industrial

$31.74 Base Rate

$11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan.

System Needs

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan — ‘Areas for improvements are known and are in the process of receiving funding.

Asset Management Plan The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

Residential $31.74 Base Rate $9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons ‘Commercial/Industrial $31.74 Base Rate $11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan,

THOMPSON

ANE ROUP

£ji0

euitton J

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY - DAMASCUS

Legend ,

BH Testment Pant ms © Manhole i * ss i ~~

— Gravity Main . seals i = Force Main USGS The National Map: Natiofial Boundaries Dataset 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System National Hiydis raph

Dataset National Land Cover Database, National Sutures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global BeasystemsiUS (efeus _) = “BLreay TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data: Natural Earth Data; US. Department of Stale Humanitarian Information Unit, and NOAA National Centers 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 - imental information, US! Coastal Relief MedelDat refreshed June. 2022

a Feet

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY EXIT 13 AREA OF LEE HIGHWAY Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Washington County Service Authority Exit 13 Area of Lee Highway sewer system is located in Washington County southwest of the Town of Abingdon. The collection system was constructed in 2015.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

342 Residential Customers 37 Commercial Customers 379 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 85% residential and 15% non- residential.

The Exit 13 pump station experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes four pump stations:

 Oak Park 1: 39 gpm lift station located at 18395 Westinghouse Road. The pump station discharges to a 3 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Oak Park 2: 60 hp lift station located on Oak Park Drive. The pump station discharges to a 12 inch force main and empties into a 15 inch gravity line.

 Exit 13: 550 gpm lift station located at 18213 Old Jonesboro Highway. The pump station discharges to a 16 inch force main and discharges to the Town of Abingdon Treatment Plant.

 Foxfire: 94 gpm lift station located at 1904 Trotters Lane. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and discharges to an 8 inch gravity line.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Wolf Creek WCWRF Collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Wolf Creek WCWRF (VPDES#: VA0026531) Treatment Plant.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 1,946,000 2,481,223 128%

February 1,950,000 1,827,653 94%

March 2,226,000 1,759,896 79%

April 2,679,000 2,294,041 86%

May 2,045,000 2,092,135 102%

June 1,875,000 3,329,065 178%

July 1,641,000 2,567,248 156%

August 1,511,000 2,375,294 157%

September 2,319,000 2,664,588 115%

October 1,263,000 3,593,956 285%

November 2,202,000 2,482,859 113%

December 2,217,000 2,327,851 105%

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY EXIT 13 AREA OF LEE HIGHWAY

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

‘System Description — The Washington County Service Authority Exit 13 Area of Lee Highway sewer system is located in Washington County southwest of the Town of Abingdon. The collection system was constructed 2015,

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

342 Residential Customers 37 Commercial Customers 379 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 85% residential and 15% non- residential

The Exit 13 pump station experiences problems with capacity due to inadequately sized lines.

The system includes four pump stations:

Oak Park 1: 39 gpm lift station located at 18395 Westinghouse Road. The pump station discharges to a 3 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.
Oak Park 2: 60 hp lift station located on Oak Park Drive. ‘The pump station discharges to a 12 inch force main and empties into a 15 inch gravity line.
Exit 13: 550 gpm lift station located at 18213 Old Jonesboro Highway. The pump station discharges to a 16 inch force main and discharges to the Town of Abingdon Treatment Plant.
Foxfire: 94 gpm lift station located at 1904 Trotters Lane. The pump station discharges to a 4 inch force main and discharges to an 8 inch gravity line.

Flow collected by the system is conveyed to the Wolf Creek WCWRE Collection system. Treatment is ultimately provided at the Wolf Creek WCWRF (VPDES#: VA0026531) Treatment Plant.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month ‘Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 1,946,000 2,481,223 128% February 1,950,000 1,827,653 94% March 2,226,000 1,759,896 9% April 2,679,000 2,294,041 86% May 2,045,000 2,092,135 102% June 1,875,000 3,329,065 178% July 1,641,000 2,567,248 156% August 1,511,000 2,375,294 157% September 2,319,000 2,664,588 115% October 1,263,000 3,593,956 285% November 2,202,000 2,482,859 113%

December 2,217,000 2,327,851 105%

Monthly Average 1,989,500 2,482,984 125%

Daily Average 65,408 81,632 125%

Avg / Customer 173 215

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years.
 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Wear on impellers due to industrial discharges.

System Needs

 Line rehabilitation,  Pump station rehabilitation,  Manhole rehabilitation,  I&I remediation.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan

Areas for improvements are known and are in the process of receiving funding.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

Residential

$31.74 Base Rate

$9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons

Commercial/Industrial

$31.74 Base Rate

$11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan.

Monthly Average 1,989,500 2,482,984 125% Daily Average 65,408 81,632 125% Avg / Customer 173 215

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The system has had no permit violations over the past 2 years,
The system is not under consent order with the DEQ

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System Wear on impellers due to industrial discharges.

System Needs

Line rehabilitation, Pump station rehabilitation, Manhole rehabilitation,

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan Areas for improvements are known and are in the process of receiving funding,

Asset Management Plan ‘The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

Residential $31.74 Base Rate $9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons

‘Commercial/Industrial $31.74 Base Rate $11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

‘The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan.

Cheek

5 » Oak Park #2 [ree Pump Station

Wyndale Heights Pump Station

Legend

Greenbriar || Pump Station

1 system Pump Station © Manhole

— Gravity Main

= Force Main

} fo 1,250 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000

a = Feet = =

Oak Park #1 Pump Station

Virginia Highlan

Foxfire ie Pump Station

Exit 13 Pump Station

eo oo

WJ scs renal Mapiltonl Golindapes Dataset. 208 ElallodlraBfam,Geodtaphic Names Information Syste} Nadangiydogrophy Woes) La cossrd’ tage Na His Dtae ord atonal Tanspottioy Dataset Uses chal Prosi US. Conas

TigeHlne ds USS Road Oat Nall tyhOag US Depatmet of Sate HumntTon formagn Uy and NOAA Ana Ceres fop Enviromental information, US, Coastal Rel Md Data Ca hue. 2022

euitton J

THOMPSON

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL

SEWER STUDY 2022

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY - EXIT 13 LEE HIGHWAY

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY HALL CREEK (VA0087378) Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Washington County Service Authority Hall Creek sewer system is located in Washington County east of the Town of Abingdon. The collection system was constructed in the 1996.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,308 Residential Customers 174 Commercial Customers

1,482 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 49% residential and 51% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 75% of the system consists of PVC and approximately 100% of the manholes are precast concrete. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2000. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1996.

The system includes twelve pump stations:  Glade #1: 553 gpm located at 13084 Monroe Road. Pump station discharges to an 8 inch force main

which empties to a 10 and 12 inch gravity line.  Glade #2: 333 gpm located at East Glade Street. Pump station discharges to an 8 inch force main which

empties to an 8 and 10 inch gravity line.  Glade #3: 27 gpm located at 698 Blue Hills Drive. Pump station discharges to a 2 inch force main which

empties to an 8 and 10 inch gravity line.  Clarksville: 27 gpm located at 10320 Crescent Road. Pump station discharges to an 8 inch force main

which empties to a 6, 8, and 10 inch gravity line.  Spring Hills: 49 gpm located at 33540 Spring Hill Drive. Pump station discharges to 4 inch force main

which empties to an 8 and 10 inch gravity line.  Utility Trailer: 40 gpm located at 13182 Monroe Road. Pump station discharges to 3 inch force main

which empties to the Glade #1 pump station.  Meadowview #1: 275 gpm located at 13280 Cardinal Lane. Pump station discharges to 6 inch force main

which empties to an 8, 10, and 12 inch gravity line.  Meadowview #2: 24 gpm located at 13351 Ritchie Road. Pump station discharges to an 8 inch force main

which empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  General Engineering: 49 gpm located on Hillman Highway. Pump station discharges to a 3 inch force

main which empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Loves: 155 gpm located at 14079 Glenbrook Drive. Pump station discharges to a 6 inch force main which

empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  IPP: 200 gpm located at 14128 Industrial Park Road. Pump station discharges to a 6 inch force main

which empties to an 8 inch gravity line.  Abingdon Steel: 75 gpm located on Hillman Highway. Pump station discharges to a four inch force main

which empties to an 8 inch gravity line.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 9,844,000 9,702,302 99%

February 11,811,000 7,146,652 61%

March 14,253,000 6,881,704 48%

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY HALL CREEK (VA0087378)

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description ~ The Washington County Service Authority Hall Creek sewer system is located in Washington County east of the Town of Abingdon. The collection system was constructed in the 1996.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

1,308 Residential Customers 174 Commercial Customers 1,482 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 49% residential and 51% non- residential.

‘The collection system consists of 4” through 12” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 75% of the system consists of PVC and approximately 100% of the manholes are precast concrete. The newest area of the

system was constructed in 2000. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in the 1996,

The system includes twelve pump stations:

Glade #2: 333 gpm located at East Glade Street. Pump station discharges to an 8 inch force main which empties to an 8 and 10 inch gravity line.
Glade #3: 27 gpm located at 698 Blue Hills Drive. Pump station discharges to a 2 inch force main which ‘empties to an 8 and 10 inch gravity line.
Clarksville: 27 gpm located at 10320 Crescent Road. Pump station discharges to an 8 inch force main which empties to a 6, 8, and 10 inch gravity line.
Spring Hills: 49 gpm located at 33540 Spring Hill Drive. Pump station discharges to 4 inch force main which empties to an 8 and 10 inch gravity line.
Utility Trailer: 40 gpm located at 13182 Monroe Road. Pump station discharges to 3 inch force main which empties to the Glade #1 pump station,
Meadowview #1: 275 gpm located at 13280 Cardinal Lane. Pump station discharges to 6 inch force main which empties to an 8, 10, and 12 inch gravity line.

General Engineering: 49 gpm located on Hillman Highway. Pump station discharges to a 3 inch force main which empties to an 8 inch gravity line.
Loves: 155 gpm located at 14079 Glenbrook Drive. Pump station ‘empties to an 8 inch gravity line.

IPP: 200 gpm located at 14128 Industrial Park Road. Pump station discharges to a 6 inch force main which empties to an & inch gravity line.

Abingdon Steel: 75 gpm located on Hillman Highway. Pump station discharges to a four inch foree main which empties to an 8 inch gravity line.

scharges to a 6 inch force main which

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent Month Treated Billed Accountable January 2021 9,844,000 9,702,302 99%

February 11,811,000 7,146,652 61% March 14,253,000 6,881,704 48%

April 10,560,000 8,970,365 85%

May 8,399,000 8,180,853 97%

June 8,800,000 13,017,611 148%

July 9,140,000 10,038,684 110%

August 9,795,000 9,288,088 95%

September 9,211,000 10,419,313 113%

October 9,431,000 14,053,412 149%

November 8,431,000 9,708,699 115%

December 8,149,000 9,102,572 112%

Monthly Average 9,818,667 9,709,188 99%

Daily Average 322,805 319,206 99%

Avg / Customer 218 215

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The system has had 3 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of chlorine residuals being too high as a result of the SO2 tanks going empty.

The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Pumps and blowers need to be replaced.

System Needs

 All metal structures for the system need to be stripped and painted,  The sewer treatment plant needs to have potable water source.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan – No plan in Action

No plan in action.

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

Residential

$31.74 Base Rate

$9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons

Commercial/Industrial

$31.74 Base Rate

$11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan.

April 10,560,000 8,970,365 85%

May 8,399,000 8,180,853 97% June 8,800,000 13,017,611 148% July 9,140,000 10,038,684 110% ‘August 9,795,000 9,288,088 95% September 9,211,000 10,419,313 113% October 9,431,000 14,053,412 149% November 8,431,000 9,708,699 115% December 8,149,000 9,102,572 112% Monthly Average 9,818,667 9,709,188 99% Daily Average 322,805 319,206 99% Avg/ Customer 218 215

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

The system has had 3 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of chlorine residuals being too high as a result of the O2 tanks going empty.

‘The system is not under consent order with the DEQ. Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

‘+ Pumps and blowers need to be replaced. System Needs

«All metal structures for the system need to be stripped and painted,

The sewer treatment plant needs to have potable water source.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance, The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan — No plan in Action No plan in action,

Asset Management Plan

The system has an asset management plan prepared by Washington County Service Authority in 2022. Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in 2022:

Residential $31.74 Base Rate $9.42 Per 1,000 Gallons

‘Commercial/Industrial $31.74 Base Rate $11.04 Per 1,000 Gallons

System Dept and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $12,116,590 in outstanding loan.

Clarksville Pump Station

Food Country Pump Station

Glade #3

‘ : Pump Station ‘orem |_ oh ———

7 Ss | eS st Glade #2

q Purp Station} Pump Station

Meadowview #2 Pump Station

Meadow View

‘ IPP : Pump Station

General Engineering ‘ianvaraier ht

s k tility Tratler |

Pump Station Pump Station |

{ ileal Meadowview #1|_/ C

Pump Station SX x ce £2 Loves / Pump Station Abingdon Steel Pump Station 2 =

: i

Legend %. [Fy Treatment Plant — cavity Main FO] Tim sytem rump sation Foreman

Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Struchres Dataset, and National Transportatign Dataset: USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureau TIGER/Lime data; USFS Road Data; Nature! Earth Data; U.S. Department of State inant Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers: No 1.750_ 3.500 7,000 10,500 14,000 < s Yor Environmental Information, US |CoaktalRelief Model, Data refreshed June, 2022.

Feet ic I.

euitton J

THOMPSON

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY - HALL CREEK

SHEET

TOWN OF WYTHEVILLE (VA0020281) Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description – The Town of Wytheville sewer system is located in Wythe County near mile marker 70 on US Route 81. The collection system was constructed in the 1920s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

2,754 Residential Customers 426 Commercial Customers 26 Industrial Customers 13 Other Municipal Systems

3,219 Total Number of Customers

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 32% residential and 68% non- residential.

The collection system consists of 6” through 24” gravity lines. It is estimated that approximately 70% of the system consists of terra cotta, transite, and concrete lines and approximately 84% of the manholes are masonry brick. The newest area of the system was constructed in 2022. The oldest areas of the system are estimated to have been constructed in 1949.

The system includes sixteen pump stations:

 Pump 1: 500 GPM lift pump located at 395 Chapman Road. The pump feeds a 12 inch force main and empties into a 12 inch gravity line.

 Pump 2: 375 GPM lift pump located at 290 Lithia Road. The pump feeds a 10 inch force main and empties into a 10 inch gravity line.

 Pump 3: 75 GPM lift pump located at 297 County Lane. The pump feeds a 2 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 4: 250 GPM lift pump located at 1715 Peppers Ferry Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 5: 250 GPM lift pump located at 620 Cove Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 6: 490 GPM lift pump located at 3185 West Ridge Road. The pump feeds an 8 inch force main and empties into a 10 inch gravity line.

 Pump 7: 120 GPM lift pump located at 1645 West Fulton Street. The pump feeds a 3 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 8: 257 GPM lift pump located at 157 County Club Lane. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 9: 420 GPM lift pump located at 1210 Old Stage Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 10: 742 GPM lift pump located at 415 Grayson Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into a 15 inch gravity line.

 Pump 11: 380 GPM lift pump located at 1810 Old Stage Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 12: 180 GPM lift pump located at 285 North Petunia Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 13: 75 GPM lift pump located at 1985 West Ridge Road. The pump feeds a 4 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

TOWN OF WYTHEVILLE (VA0020281)

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission

System Description - The Town of Wytheville sewer system is located in Wythe County near mile marker 70 on US Route 81. The collection system was constructed in the 1920s.

The approximate number of customers served by the system was reported to be:

2.154 Residential Customers 26 Commercial Customers Industrial Customers

Other Municipal Systems 3,219. Total Number of Customers

wis Bk

The system’s customer billings flows for 2021 were estimated to be approximately 32% residential and 68% non- residential.

The system includes sixteen pump stations:

Pump 1: 500 GPM lift pump located at 395 Chapman Road. The pump feeds a 12 inch force main and ‘empties into a 12 inch gravity line.

Pump 2: 375 GPM lift pump located at 290 Lithia Road. The pump feeds a 10 inch force main and empties into a 10 inch gravity line.

Pump 3: 75 GPM lift pump located at 297 County Lane. The pump feeds a2 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line,

Pump 4: 250 GPM lift pump located at 1715 Peppers Ferry Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 5: 250 GPM lift pump located at 620 Cove Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 6: 490 GPM lift pump located at 3185 West Ridge Road, ‘The pump feeds an 8 inch force main and empties into a 10 inch gravity line,

Pump 7: 120 GPM lift pump located at 1645 West Fulton Street, The pump feeds a 3 inch force main and ‘empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 8: 257 GPM lift pump located at 157 County Club Lane. ‘The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and ‘empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 9: 420 GPM lift pump located at 1210 Old Stage Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and ‘empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 10: 742 GPM lift pump located at 415 Grayson Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and ‘empties into a 15 inch gravity line.

Pump 11: 380 GPM lift pump located at 1810 Old Stage Road. The pump feeds a ‘empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

inch fore main and

Pump 12: 180 GPM lift pump located at 285 North Petunia Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main ‘and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 13: 75 GPM lift pump located at 1985 West Ridge Road. The pump feeds a 4 inch force main and ‘empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 14: 25 GPM lift pump located at 125 Caroline Circle. The pump feeds a 2 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 15: 35 GPM pump located at 690 Old Stage Road. The pump feeds a 2 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

 Pump 16: 180 GPM lift pump located at 290 Echo Hollow Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main and empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Gallons Percent

Month Treated Billed Accountable

January 2021 75,155,000 31,573,810 42%

February 91,537,000 29,897,530 33%

March 101,253,000 35,612,790 35%

April 79,864,000 35,556,970 45%

May 56,279,000 35,697,750 63%

June 51,306,000 31,734,820 62%

July 60,176,000 34,487,860 57%

August 53,308,000 37,745,860 71%

September 48,348,000 35,571,630 74%

October 53,245,000 36,485,100 69%

November 41,430,000 30,605,050 74%

December 40,808,000 31,992,010 78%

Monthly Average 62,725,750 33,913,432 54%

Daily Average 2,062,216 1,114,962 54%

Avg / Customer 640 346

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

 The Town of Wytheville collection system had 25+ reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. 5 were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 20+ were due to line blockages created by root intrusion, grease, or other debris.

 The system has had 10 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of line breaks within the system.

 The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

 Worn out equipment,  High maintenance costs.

System Needs

 Line rehabilitation,  Pump station rehabilitation,  Manhole rehabilitation,  I&I remediation,  Increased system capacity.

Pump 14: 25 GPM lift pump located at 125 Caroline Circle. The pump feeds a 2 inch force main and

‘empties into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 15: 35 GPM pump located at 690 Old Stage Road. The pump feeds a2 inch force main and empties

into an 8 inch gravity line.

Pump 16: 180 GPM li and empties into an 8 inch gravity line

pump located at 290 Echo Hollow Road. The pump feeds a 6 inch force main

System Flows -A summary of the system’s collected and billed flows for calendar year 2021 is provided as follows:

Gallons Month ‘Treated January 2021 75,155,000 February 91,537,000 March 101,253,000 April 79,864,000 May 56,279,000 June 51,306,000 July 60,176,000 August 53,308,000 September 48,348,000 October 53,245,000 November 41,430,000 December 40,808,000 Monthly Average 62,725,750 Daily Average 2,062,216 Avg / Customer 640

Permit Violations/System Overflows/Consent Order

31,573,810 29,897,530 35,612,790 35,556,970 35,697,750 31,734,820 34,487,860 37,745,860 35,571,630 36,485,100 30,605,050 31,992,010 33,913,432 1,114,962 346

Percent Accountable 42% 33% 35% 45% 63% 62% 571% 11% 74% 69% 74% 78% 54% 54%

The Town of Wytheville collection system had 25+ reported sewer system overflows during calendar year 2021. § were due to excessive Infiltration and Inflow, 20+ were due to line blockages created by

root intrusion, grease, or other debris.

The system has had 10 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of line

breaks within the system. ‘The system is not under consent order with the DEQ.

Other Maintenance Related Issues Experienced by System

Worn out equipment, High maintenance costs.

System Needs

Line rehabilitation, Pump station rehabilitation, Manhole rehabilitation,

1&1 remediation,

Increased system capacity.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side issues such as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan

The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2018. The CIP includes $5,900,000 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure

The following sewer rate structure was last modified in January 2022:

$13.00 Fixed Rate

$1.81 Per 1,000 Gallons Between 0 - 3,000 Gallons

$6.13 Per 1,000 Gallons Between 3,000 - 7,000 Gallons

$6.19 Per 1,000 Gallons Between 7,000 - 15,000 Gallons

$5.97 Per 1,000 Gallons Between 15,000 - 75,000 Gallons

$6.50 Per 1,000 Gallons Between 75,000 - 3,400,000 Gallons

$8.30 Per 1,000 Gallons Between 3,400,000 - 6,500,000 Gallons

$8.28 Per 1,000 Gallons 6,500,000 Gallons Over

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans

The system currently has approximately $3,305,374.48 in outstanding loan.

Sewer Use Ordinance

The system is governed by an existing sewer use ordinance. The ordinance does address private side as connections with roof gutters, sump pumps, and lateral lines.

Capital Improvements Plan The system currently has a CIP adopted in 2018. The CIP includes $5,900,000 of projects for completion in the next 5 years.

Asset Management Plan

The system does not have an asset management plan.

Sewer Rate Structure ‘The following sewer rate structure was last modified in January 2022:

System Debt and Maturity Date of Outstanding Loans The system currently has approximately $3,305,374.48 in outstanding loan.

TOWN OF WYTHVILLE– VPDES PERMIT #VA0020281 TOWN OF WYTHVILLE Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 852 Atkins Mill Rd, Wytheville, VA 24382 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1977. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1993 and involved installing two additional clarifiers and increased total capacity to 4 mgd. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Wytheville collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 4.0 MGD.
The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.941 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 3.066 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Reed Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Wytheville. Currently, 7 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 1, 2 Class 2, and 2 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 10 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of breaks withing the system.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Worn out equipment,  Require upgrades,

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Solids handling equipment,  Replacing the thickener,  Installation of larger digesters.

TOWN OF WYTHVILLE- VPDES PERMIT #VA0020281 TOWN OF WYTHVILLE Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 852 Atkins Mill Rd, Wytheville, VA 24382 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1977. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 1993 and involved installing two additional clarifiers and increased total capacity to 4 mgd. The facility utilizes activated sludge as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Wytheville collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 4.0 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 1.941 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 ‘was 3.066 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Reed Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by the Town of Wytheville. Currently, 7 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 2 Class 1,2 Class 2, and 2 Class 3. The facility is required to be staffed 16 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 10 permit violations over the past 2 years. The violations were the result of breaks withing the system,

sues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues ity are as follows:

Maintenance Related experienced by the fa

Require upgrades,

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Solids handling equipment,
Replacing the thickener,

Installation of larger digesters.

suitton J

THOMPSON

ANE ROUP

-£jio

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

TOWN OF WYTHEVILLE

Legend

DEQ

Pump Station #10

-| [GF] Treatment Plant

System Pump Station yi

© Manhole ==> Force Main 4 —— USGS The National Wap: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program; Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography i —— Gravity main Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Giobal Ecosystems; US. Census SHEET J Bureau TIGERYLine data; USES Road Dat; Natural Earth Data; US. Oepartnent of State Humanitarian lfortiatn Unit; and NOAA National Centers = 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 for Environmental information US. Coastal Relief ode, Data tetteshed June, 2022. a cae Pook 2 ca

WYTHE COUNTY AUSTINVILLE– VPDES PERMIT #VA0067059 WYTHE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 334 Kohler Ave, Austinville VA 24312 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1949. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2022 and involved conveyance system in most of the roadways and basic upgrades at the plant. The facility utilizes Trickling Filter as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Austinville collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.02 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.003 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.003 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Bubble Branch of the New River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by Wythe County Board of Supervisors.
Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 4 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility – The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

 Repair of trickling filter enclosure

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 UV disinfection,  Enclosure repair.

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements – The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $100,000.

WYTHE COUNTY AUSTINVILLE- VPDES PERMIT #VA0067059 WYTHE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 334 Kohler Ave, Austinville VA 24312 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1949. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2022 and involved conveyance system in most of the roadways and basic upgrades at the plant. The facility utilizes Trickling Filter as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Town of Austinville collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.02 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.003 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.003 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to the Bubble Branch of the New River. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by Wythe County Board of Supervisors. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 4 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Maintenance Related Issues Experienced at the Facility ~ The predominant maintenance issues experienced by the facility are as follows:

Repair of trickling filter enclosure

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows

UV disinfection,
Enclosure repair

Opinion of Probable Cost for Necessary Facility Improvements ~ The opinion of probable cost for the identified facility improvements is $100,000.

Legend

{S} Treatment Plant [System Pump Station — Gravity Main

Force Main

0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 a = eed Feet

USGS The Naish! Map: National Bourares Dataset, SDEP Elevation rogram, Geographic Naines Information System, National Hydregraphy Dataset National Land Cover Dscabase, Nationa Structutes Dataset and National Transportation Dataset USGS Global Ecosysternsj US. Census “Biseny TIGERLine data USFS Road Data; Natal Earth DatarS. Deparment of Sate Humanitarian Information Uni and NOAR National esters

3 for Environmental information, US: Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed June, 2022.

]

THOMPSO & LITTON

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

AUSTINVILLE

WYTHE COUNTY - EXIT 24 POPLAR CAMP /

WYTHE COUNTY FORT CHISWELL– VPDES PERMIT #VA0074161 WYTHE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 631 Locust Hill Rd, Max Meadows, VA 24360 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1998. The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2010 and involved increasing the plant’s capacity to 1.25 mgd. The facility utilizes Sequencing Batch Reactors as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Fort Chiswell, Grahams Forge, and Reed Creek Progress Park collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 1.25 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.38 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.549 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 2 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Reed Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation – The facility is operated and maintained by the Wythe County Board of Supervisors.
Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 Expansion.

WYTHE COUNTY FORT CHISWELL- VPDES PERMIT #VA0074161 WYTHE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 631 Locust Hill Rd, Max Meadows, VA 24360 (sce attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 1998. ‘The last major upgrade/expansion was completed in 2010 and involved increasing the plant’s capacity to 1.25 mgd. The facility utilizes Sequencing Batch Reactors as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Fort Chiswell, Grahams Forge, and Reed Creek Progress Park collection system(s). The facility does receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 1.25 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.38 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.549 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 2 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Reed Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at a landfill.

Facility Operation ~ The facility is operated and maintained by the Wythe County Board of Supervisors. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 8 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

Expansion.

euitton J

THOMPSON

Ane / ROUP

£ji0

Maxlendos

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

— “| | bas 526 , S28 woz cRS =P

Legend

DEQ

{S] Treatment Plant [System Pump Station j

— Gravity Main

=== Force Main

Uses hte ao nana lpsresDst SDE iin Progam Cog amenomstenderntenycosagy Dates Neon! over uae Ne rer ster nd Red aoe Dated Ue Gop mere 0S Ge Bureau TIGER/Line data: USFS Road Data; Netural Earth Data; U.S. Department of state Huntan]latian Information Unit, and NOAA National Centers

0 2,000 4,000 8,000 12,000 16,000 20,000

for Environmental information )S. Coastal Relief Model. Data réfreshed June, 2022

a ee Feet

WYTHE COUNTY SHORTS CREEK – VPDES PERMIT #VA0092843 WYTHE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description – The treatment facility is located at 186 Castleton Rd, Austinville, VA 24312 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 2018. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment.

Flow Characteristics – The treatment facility receives sewage from the Poplar Camp Exit 24 collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.02 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.002 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0.002 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Shorts Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at the Fort Chiswell treatment plant.

Permit Violations – The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Facility Needs – Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, etc…) needs are as follows:

 More flow.

WYTHE COUNTY SHORTS CREEK — VPDES PERMIT #VA0092843 WYTHE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mount Rogers Planning Commission

Facility Description — The treatment facility is located at 186 Castleton Rd, Austinville, VA 24312 (see attached general vicinity map). The facility was originally constructed in 2018. The facility utilizes extended aeration as the method of sewage treatment,

Flow Characteristics ~ The treatment facility receives sewage from the Poplar Camp Exit 24 collection system(s). The facility does not receive and treat septage. The permitted capacity of the facility is 0.02 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility during calendar year 2021 was 0.002 MGD. The average daily flow treated at the facility for the highest three consecutive month period during calendar year 2021 was 0,002 MGD. The facility exceeded 80% capacity for 0 days during this period. Effluent from the plant is discharged to Shorts Creek. Sludge from the facility is disposed of at the Fort Chiswell ‘treatment plant.

Facility Operation — The facility is operated and maintained by Wythe County Board of Supervisors. Currently, 3 full time and 0 part time licensed operators work at the facility. 3 Class 2. The facility is required to be staffed 4 hours/day.

Permit Violations ~ The facility has had 0 permit violations over the past 2 years.

Facility Needs ~ Identified facility (identified in CIP, PER, ete…) needs are as follows:

More flow.

APPENDIX B

POTENTIAL NEW WASTEWATER EXTENSION & DECENTRALIZED SEWER PROJECTS

This Appendix includes individual project description sheets and updated construction cost estimates for potential new wastewater extension projects that were either a) identified in the 2005 Study but have not yet been completed or b) requested by the utility provider(s) to be included in this Study.

The Conventional-type collection projects have been categorized into the three Planning Districts. A location map is provided for each County. All Decentralized collection projects have been grouped together at the back of this section.

APPENDIX B

POTENTIAL NEW WASTEWATER EXTENSION & DECENTRALIZED SEWER PROJECTS

APPENDIX B

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT CONVENTIONAL PROJECTS

APPENDIX B

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT CONVENTIONAL PROJECTS

18,000 24,000 Feet

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Leemaster/Lovers Gap/Dry Fork Sewer Extension

County: Buchanan

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Buchanan County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 47,400 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Existing WWTP: Name: Conaway WWTP

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.667 MGD

Receiving Stream: Levisa Fork

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Trace Fork Impaired (Y/N): No

Big Lick Branch No

Dry Fork No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 257 Commercial = 13 Industrial = 2

Health Hazards: Failing septic systems and straight pipes suspected.

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment

capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $14,381,380

Cost Per Connection: $52,873

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name

County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water (Y/N):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Cost Per Connection:

Name:

Design Flow: Average Flow: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

_ co _ fo

Residential = 257° Commercial= = 13.sIndustrial= = 2

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Lower Mill Branch/Elkins Branch Sewer Extension

County: Buchanan

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Buchanan County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Approximately 1/3 of project area

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 28,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Existing WWTP: Name: Conaway WWTP Design Flow: 2.00 MGD Average Flow: 1.667 MGD Receiving Stream: Levisa Fork Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Lower Mill Branch Impaired (Y/N): No Elkins Branch No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 99 Commercial = 4 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards: Failing septic systems and straight pipes suspected.

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - High Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $8,312,525

Cost Per Connection: $80,704

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Impaired (YIN): na

Residential = 99 Commercil= Industrial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Lynn Camp/Looney Creek Sewer Extension

County: Buchanan

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Buchanan County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 24,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Existing WWTP: Name: Conaway WWTP Design Flow: 2.00 MGD Average Flow: 1.667 MGD Receiving Stream: Levisa Fork Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Lynn Camp Creek Impaired (Y/N): No Looney Creek No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 132 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards: Failing septic systems and straight pipes suspected.

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,250,100

Cost Per Connection: $54,925

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Impaired (YIN): na

Residential = ©4382 Commercil= Industrial =

; @ Proposed Sewer Project | f 2 <> s

PS RE 2 f 6,500 13,000 i . 52,000 65,000 Feet

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Lockhart Flats Sewer Extension

County: Dickenson

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Clintwood

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 13,300 linear feet of 2-inch force main and one grinder pump station.

Existing WWTP: Name: Clintwood WWTP

Design Flow: 0.495 MGD

Average Flow: 0.153 MGD

Receiving Stream: Cranes Nest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Cranes Nest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 56 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,505,060

Cost Per Connection: $62,590

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: Map Average Flow: Map Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

Impaired (YIN): | |

industiial=

Resident

56 Commercial

__ {DRILL MOUNTAIN |=

@ Proposed Sewer Project z Tas

z z z = E 6,500 13,000 26,000 . = ———

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Drill Mountain Sewer Extension

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes, Construction in progress

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 57,400 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Existing WWTP: Name: Honaker STP

Design Flow: 0.400 MGD

Average Flow: 0.113 MGD

Receiving Stream: Lewis Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Lewis Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 215 Commercial = 5 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems and straight pipes.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low/Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $16,811,080

Cost Per Connection: $76,414.00

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utlity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

Name: bewis Creek Impaired (YIN): Yes 215 Commercial= 5 Industriah=

Residential

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Swords Creek Sewer Extension

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 60,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 7,600 linear feet of

6-inch force main and one pump station.

Existing WWTP: Name: Honaker STP

Design Flow: 0.400 MGD

Average Flow: 0.113 MGD

Receiving Stream: Lewis Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Swords Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 328 Commercial = 12 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low/Moderate

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $20,012,980

Cost Per Connection: $58,861.71

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utlity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibiliy:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

Name: _—— Swords Greek Impaired (YIN): Yes © 828 Commercial= 12 Industri

Residential

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Castlewood Sewer Project – Phase II (Mew Road)

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: St. Paul

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 0.081 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Castle Run Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 145 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,962,175

Present Worth Per Connection: $54,912

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The Castlewood Sewer Project – Phase II will extend public sewer service to the west along Mew Road (Route

65). The project will begin near the intersection of U.S. Route 58 and Mew Road and extend to the intersection

of Mew Road and Longview Drive. The project will include one (1) pump station and (4) grinder stations with

approximately 19,000 linear feet of gravity sewer 6,500 linear feet of force main to provide sanitary sewer

service to 145 residential connections.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Watar (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream (VIN):

Name:

Impaired (YN): | |

Residential = Commer

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Dante To St. Paul

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: St. Paul

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 0.081 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Castle Run Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 182 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,219,713

Present Worth Per Connection: $17,691

The project area is served by a public sewage system. The wastewater is conveyed to and treated at the Dante

Community WWTP. The intent of this project is to abandon the existing WWTP and convey the wastewater to

the St. Paul Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The Dante To St. Paul Sewer Project will abandon the Dante WWTP and convey the wastewater to the St. Paul

WWTP. The project will begin at the existing force main on Route 63 that conveys the sewer to the Dante

WWTP and extend to the Town of St. Paul. Approximately 18 additional connections along Route 63 will be

provided sewer service with this project. The project will include one (1) pump station and (2) grinder pump

stations with approximately 30,000 linear feet of 6-inch force main, and 1,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer

to provide sanitary sewer service to a total of 182 residential connections.

Very Feasible - The project will abandon the approximately 30 year old Dante WWTP which will need to be

rehabilitated or replaced in the near future and convey the wastewater to connect to an existing system with

adequate treatment capacity.

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Watar (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

Impaired (YIN) Ha

Residential = 182 Commercial= = Industrial =

ROUTE 699 fe == TAZEWELL TO CLAYPOOL HILL

WITTEN VALLEY

BUNDYS CHAPEL TO TAZEWELL

& Aa WITTEN VALLEY |*“” BUNDYS CHAPEL |… TO LIBERTY 2

BUNDYS CHAPEL TO WARDELL

cuned, mountaiit

@ Proposed Sewer Project

-|9__ 6,500. 13,000 26,000 39,000 52,000 Se = Feet “ = = =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wrights Valley/ Tiptop to St. Clair’s Crossing Sewer

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Portions of the service area are served by public water

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

utilize septic systems

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 51,250 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer

extending from Tiptop to Saint Clair’s Crossing.

The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing

Westside WWTP

Existing WWTP: Name: Bluefield Westside WWTP

Design Flow: 8.1 MGD

Average Flow: 3.858 MGD

Receiving Stream: Bluestone River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Middle New Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 250 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 3

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $15,322,450

Cost Per Connection: $60,563

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wrights Valley! Tiptop to St. Clair’s Crossing Sewer County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Portions of the service area are served by public water

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents utilize septic systems

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 51,250 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from Tiptop to Saint Ciair’s Crossing, The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing

Westside WWTP Existing WWTP. Name: Bluefield Westside WWTP. Design Flow: 81 MGD Average Flow: 3.858 MGD Receiving Stream Bluestone River Stream Classification: v Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Middle New Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 250 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 3 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Growth Potential: Residential - Low ‘Commercial - Low Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $15,322,450

Cost Per Connection: $60,563

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wrights Valley/Wittens Mill to Tiptop Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 65,125 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 4,000 LF of

4-inch force main and 1 pump station extending from Wright’s Valley to Tiptop.

The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing

Tazewell WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Tazewell WWTP

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.893 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 291 Commercial = 5 Industrial = 5

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Low - Requires the construction of the Tazewell to Divides collection system.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $20,376,688

Cost Per Connection: $67,697

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wrights Valley/Wittens Mill to Tiptop Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 65,125 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 4,000 LF of 4-inch force main and 1 pump station extending from Wright’s Valley to Tiptop. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing

Tazewell WWTP. Existing WWTP. Name: Tazewell WWTP

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.893 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: Vv

Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 291 Commercial = 5 Industrial= 5 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Low - Requires the construction of the Tazewell to Divides collection system.

Itis anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area. Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $20,376,688

Cost Per Connection: $67,697

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Mill Creek Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 28,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer

extending from the Mill Creek area of Tazewell County to the existing Raven/Doran collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 106 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $8,193,250

Cost Per Connection: $77,295

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Mill Creek Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 28,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Mill Creek area of Tazewell County to the existing Raven/Doran collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 106 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Growth Potential: Residential - Low ‘Commercial - Low Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $8,193,250

Cost Per Connection: $77,295

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Bluefield to Divides Sewer Extension Phases 2 and 3

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 22,935 linear feet of 12-inch gravity sewer, 44,545 linear

feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 4,600 LF of 2-inch force main and 1 pump station extending

from Bluestone Regional Business and Technology Center to the Divides within Tazewell County.

The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing

Bluefield Westside WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Bluefield Westside WWTP

Design Flow: 8.1 MGD

Average Flow: 3.858 MGD

Receiving Stream: Bluestone River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Middle New Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 569 Commercial = 15 Industrial = 5

Health Hazard: Per local local health officials, failing septic systems and/or “straight pipes” are present.

Also there are high total/fecal coliform counts in the Bluestone River in the project area.

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - This project requires the construction of the Bluefield to Divides Phase 1 collection

system.

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $24,253,944

Cost Per Connection: $41,178

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Bluefield to Divides Sewer Extension Phases 2 and 3 County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 22,935 linear feet of 12-inch gravity sewer, 44,545 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 4,600 LF of 2-inch force main and 1 pump station extending from Bluestone Regional Business and Technology Center to the Divides within Tazewell County. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Bluefield Westside WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Bluefield Westside WWTP. Design Flow: 81 MGD Average Flow: 3.858 MGD Receiving Stream Bluestone River Stream Classification: v Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Middle New Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 569 Commercial = 15 Industrial= 5 Health Hazard Per local local health officials, failing septic systems and/or “straight pipes" are present.

Also there are high total/fecal coliform counts in the Bluestone River in the project area.

Construction Feasibility Moderate - This project requires the construction of the Bluefield to Divides Phase 1 collection system.

Growth Potential: Residential - High Commercial - High Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $24,253,944

Cost Per Connection: $41,178

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Green’s Chapel Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 8,800 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 6,000 LF of

4-inch force main, and 2 pump stations extending from the Green’s Chapel area of Tazewell

County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system. The sewerage generated within the

project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Claypool Hill WWTP

Design Flow: 0.70 MGD

Average Flow: 0.225 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 24 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered in about fifty percent of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,111,510

Cost Per Connection: $171,313

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Green’s Chapel Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 8,800 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 6,000 LF of 4-inch force main, and 2 pump stations extending from the Green’s Chapel area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Claypool Hill WWTP Design Flow: 0.70 MGD Average Flow: 0.225 MGD Receiving Stream Little River Stream Classification: vv Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 24 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Itis anticipated that rock will be encountered in about fifty percent of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,111,510

Cost Per Connection: $171,313

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Baptist Valley West Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project The project consists of approximately 19,800 linear feet of 12-inch gravity sewer, 6,600 LF of

10-inch gravity sewer, 127,270 LF of 8-inch gravity sewer, 13,200 LF of 4-inch force main,

330 LF of 2-inch force main, 3-90 GPM pump stations, and 1-30 GPM pump station

extending from the Western Baptist Valley area of Tazewell County to the existing Richlands

collection system. Sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed

to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name = Richlands WWTP

Design Flow = 4.00 MGD

Average Flow = 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream = Clinch River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Impaired= Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1100 Commercial = 8 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost $53,249,703

Cost Per Connection $48,059

Upper Clinch

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Baptist Valley West Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project. The project consists of approximately 19,800 linear feet of 12-inch gravity sewer, 6,600 LF of 10-inch gravity sewer, 127,270 LF of 8-inch gravity sewer, 13,200 LF of 4-inch force main, 330 LF of 2-inch force main, 3-90 GPM pump stations, and 1-30 GPM pump station extending from the Western Baptist Valley area of Tazewell County to the existing Richlands collection system. Sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name = Richlands WWTP. Design Flow= 4.00 MGD Average Flo 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream Clinch River ‘Stream Classification = Vv Impaired Stream Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Upper Clinch Impaired= Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1100 Commercial = 8 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost $53,249,703

Cost Per Connection $48,059

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wardell Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 32,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending

throughout the Wardell area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system.

The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing

Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Claypool Hill WWTP

Design Flow: 0.70 MGD

Average Flow: 0.225 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 85 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 5

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $9,246,900

Cost Per Connection: $92,469

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wardell Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock,

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 32,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending throughout the Wardell area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hil collection system, The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Claypool Hill WWTP Design Flow: 0.70 MGD Average Flow: 0.225 MGD Receiving Stream Little River Stream Classification: vv Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 85 Commercial = 10 Industrial= 5 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $9,246,900

Cost Per Connection: $92,469

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rte. 639 (Cliffield to Baptist Valley) Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 14,300 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from

the Rt 639 area in Tazewell County to the proposed Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt.1 collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 100 Commercial = 2 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Low - Requires the construction of the Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt. 1 collection system.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,448,860

Cost Per Connection: $43,616

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rte. 639 (Ciiffield to Baptist Valley) Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 14,300 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Rt 639 area in Tazewell County to the proposed Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt.1 collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 100 Commercial = 2 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Low - Requires the construction of the Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt. 1 collection system Itis anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,448,860

Cost Per Connection: $43,616

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Route 699 Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 14,300 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from

the Rt 699 area in Tazewell County to the proposed Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt.1 collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 50 Commercial = 3 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Low - Requires the construction of the Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt. 1 collection system.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,178,135

Cost Per Connection: $78,833

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Route 699 Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 14,300 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Rt 699 area in Tazewell County to the proposed Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt.1 collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 50 Commercial = 3 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Low - Requires the construction of the Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt. 1 collection system Itis anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,178,135

Cost Per Connection: $78,833

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Route 637 Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 9,900 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from

the Rt. 637 area in Tazewell County to the proposed Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt.1 collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Richlands WWTP

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 42 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - Requires the construction of the Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt. 1 collection system.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,921,880

Cost Per Connection: $69,569

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Route 637 Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents use septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 9,900 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Rt. 637 area in Tazewell County to the proposed Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt.1 collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 42 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Moderate - Requires the construction of the Claypool Hill to Tazewell Alt. 1 collection system. Itis anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,921,880

Cost Per Connection: $69,569

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Kents Ridge North Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 24,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer and 2,200 LF

of 6-inch gravity sewer extending from the Northern Kents Ridge area of Tazewell County to

the existing Richlands collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area

would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 70 Commercial = 4 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,370,090

Cost Per Connection: $99,596

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Kents Ridge North Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 24,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer and 2,200 LF of 6-inch gravity sewer extending from the Northern Kents Ridge area of Tazewell County to the existing Richlands collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 70 Commercial = 4 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Itis anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area,

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,370,090

Cost Per Connection: $99,596

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Kents Ridge South Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 17,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 2,200 LF of

4-inch force main, 1-20 GPM pump station, and 1 pump station upgrade extending from

the Southern Kents Ridge area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Claypool Hill WWTP

Design Flow: 0.70 MGD

Average Flow: 0.225 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 50 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $6,157,060

Cost Per Connection: $123,141

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Kents Ridge South Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 17,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 2,200 LF of 4-inch force main, 1-20 GPM pump station, and 1 pump station upgrade extending from the Southern Kents Ridge area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Claypool Hill WWTP Design Flow: 0.70 MGD Average Flow: 0.225 MGD Receiving Stream Little River Stream Classification: vv Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 50 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $6,157,060

Cost Per Connection: $123,141

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Road Ridge Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

use septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 30,700 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, extending

from the Road Ridge area of Tazewell County to the existing Raven collection system. The

sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing

Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 83 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $8,799,765

Cost Per Connection: $106,021

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Road Ridge Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 30,700 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, extending from the Road Ridge area of Tazewell County to the existing Raven collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP,

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 83 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $8,799,765

Cost Per Connection: $106,021

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Willow Springs Sewer Extension Phase 2

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Two septic systems

have been condemned and approvals for future septic systems does not seem likely

due to poor percolation rates of the soil.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 1,600 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 1,600 LF of

2-inch force main, and 1-0.02 MGD pump station extending from the Willow Springs area

of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system. The sewerage generated

within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Claypool Hill WWTP

Design Flow: 0.70 MGD

Average Flow: 0.225 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 5 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $785,525

Cost Per Connection: $157,105

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Willow Springs Sewer Extension Phase 2 County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Two septic systems have been condemned and approvals for future septic systems does not seem likely due to poor percolation rates of the soil

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 1,600 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 1,600 LF of 2-inch force main, and 1-0.02 MGD pump station extending from the Willow Springs area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool! Hill collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Claypool Hill WWTP Design Flow: 0.70 MGD Average Flow: 0.225 MGD Receiving Stream Little River Stream Classification: vv Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 5 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $785,525

Cost Per Connection: $187,105

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Willow Springs Sewer Extension Phase 3

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Two septic systems

have been condemned and approvals for future septic systems does not seem likely due to

poor percolation rates of the soil.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 4,800 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 480 LF of

6-inch gravity sewer, 320 LF of 4-inch force main, and 1-0.043 MGD pump station extending

from the Willow Springs area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Claypool Hill WWTP

Design Flow: 0.70 MGD

Average Flow: 0.225 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 30 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,006,342

Cost Per Connection: $66,878

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Willow Springs Sewer Extension Phase 3 County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 4,800 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 480 LF of 6-inch gravity sewer, 320 LF of 4-inch force main, and 1-0.043 MGD pump station extending from the Willow Springs area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Claypool Hill WWTP Design Flow: 0.70 MGD Average Flow: 0.225 MGD Receiving Stream Little River Stream Classification: vv Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 30 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $2,006,342

Cost Per Connection: $66,878

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Forest Hills Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. The Health Department

has limited the development within Forest Hills subdivision because of poor soil conditions.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 14,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 3,000 LF of

4-inch force main, and 1-35gpm pump station extending from the Forest Hills area of

Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system. The sewerage generated

within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Claypool Hill WWTP

Design Flow: 0.70 MGD

Average Flow: 0.225 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 77 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project

area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $5,226,975

Cost Per Connection: $67,883

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Forest Hills Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. The Health Department has limited the development within Forest Hills subdivision because of poor soil conditions.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 14,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 3,000 LF of 4-inch force main, and 1-35gpm pump station extending from the Forest Hills area of Tazewell County to the existing Claypool Hill collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Claypool Hill WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Claypool Hill WWTP Design Flow: 0.70 MGD Average Flow: 0.225 MGD Receiving Stream Little River Stream Classification: vv Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 77 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Very feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $5,226,975

Cost Per Connection: $67,883

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Tazewell) Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 48,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, a 75 gpm

pump station and 2,200 LF of 4-inch force main extending from the Bundy’s Chapel area of

Tazewell Co to the existing Tazewell collection system. The sewerage generated within the

project area would ultimately be conveyed to the ex. Tazewell WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Tazewell WWTP

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.893 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 132 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $14,506,960

Cost Per Connection: $109,901

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Tazewell) Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system, Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 48,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, a 75 gpm pump station and 2,200 LF of 4-inch force main extending from the Bundy’s Chapel area of Tazewell Co to the existing Tazewell collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the ex. Tazewell WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Tazewell WWTP Design Flow: 2.00 MGD Average Flow: 0.893 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 132 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Very feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $14,506,960

Cost Per Connection: $109,901

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Liberty) Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 18,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 14,000 LF of

4-inch force main, and 1 pump station extending from Bundy’s Chapel to the Liberty area of

Tazewell County. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be

conveyed to the existing Tazewell WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Tazewell WWTP

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.893 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 42 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Low - This project requires the construction of the Bundys Chapel to Tazewell collection

system.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,714,850

Cost Per Connection: $183,687

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Liberty) Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system, Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 18,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 14,000 LF of 4-inch force main, and 1 pump station extending from Bundy’s Chapel to the Liberty area of ‘Tazewell County. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Tazewell WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Tazewell WWTP Design Flow: 2.00 MGD Average Flow: 0.893 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 42 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Low - This project requires the construction of the Bundys Chapel to Tazewell collection system. Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low Total Project Cost: $7,714,850

Cost Per Connection: $183,687

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Wardell) Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 42,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 20,000 LF of

4-inch force main, and 4 pump stations extending from Bundy’s Chaper to the Wardell area of

Tazewell County. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be

conveyed to the existing Tazewell WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Tazewell WWTP

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.893 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 80 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Low - This project requires the construction of both the Bundys Chapel to Tazewell and

Bundys Chapel to Liberty collection systems.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $16,695,250

Cost Per Connection: $208,691

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Wardell) Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system, Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 42,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 20,000 LF of 4-inch force main, and 4 pump stations extending from Bundy’s Chaper to the Wardell area of ‘Tazewell County. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Tazewell WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Tazewell WWTP Design Flow: 2.00 MGD Average Flow: 0.893 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 80 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Construction Feasibility Low - This project requires the construction of both the Bundys Chapel to Tazewell and

Bundys Chapel to Liberty collection systems.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $16,695,250

Cost Per Connection: $208,691

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Tazewell to Claypool Hill Sewer Extension Alternative 1

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Portions of the service area are served by public water

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 72,300 linear feet of 10-inch gravity sewer and 96,400 LF

of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Claypool Hill/Tazewell area of Tazewell County to

the existing Richlands collection system. The sewage generated within the project area

would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 444 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 10

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project

area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $51,313,080

Cost Per Connection: $110,589

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Tazewell to Claypool Hill Sewer Extension Alternative 1 County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Portions of the service area are served by public water

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system, Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 72,300 linear feet of 10-inch gravity sewer and 96,400 LF of &-inch gravity sewer extending from the Claypool Hill/Tazewell area of Tazewell County to the existing Richlands collection system. The sewage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 444 Commercial = 10 Industrial= 10 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - High Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $51,313,080

Cost Per Connection: $110,589

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Tazewell to Claypool Hill Sewer Extension Alternative 2

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Portions of the service area are served by public water

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 52,600 linear feet of 10-inch gravity sewer and 96,400 LF

of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Claypool Hill/Tazewell area of Tazewell County.

The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the proposed

200,000 GPD WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: NA

Design Flow: NA MGD

Average Flow: NA MGD

Receiving Stream: NA

Stream Classification: NA

Impaired Stream (Y/N): NA

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 444 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 10

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - Will require the construction of a WWTP. Additionally, it is anticipated that rock

will be encountered throughout much of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $47,766,680

Cost Per Connection: $102,945

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Tazewell to Claypool Hill Sewer Extension Alternative 2 County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Portions of the service area are served by public water

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system, Therefore, residents utilize septic systems.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 52,600 linear feet of 10-inch gravity sewer and 96,400 LF of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Claypool! Hill/Tazewell area of Tazewell County. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the proposed 200,000 GPD WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: NA Design Flow: NA MGD Average Flow: NA MGD Receiving Stream: NA Stream Classification: NA Impaired Stream (YIN): NA Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 444 Commercial = 10 Industrial= 10 Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Moderate - Will require the construction of a WWTP. Additionally, itis anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - High Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $47,766,680

Cost Per Connection: $102,945

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Abbs Valley Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

utilize septic systems that could contaminate the underground stream that flows through the

valley

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 31,400 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 8,342 LF of

4-inch force main, 2-80 gpm pump stations, 1,100 LF of 2-inch force main and

1-20 gpm pump station extending from Abbs Valley to Boissevain.

Existing WWTP: Name: Northern Tazewell County WWTP

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 0.217 MGD

Receiving Stream: Laurel Fork

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Middle New Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 420 Commercial = 15 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project

area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $13,287,732

Cost Per Connection: $30,547

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Abbs Valley Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents utilize septic systems that could contaminate the underground stream that flows through the valley

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 31,400 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 8,342 LF of

4-inch force main, 2-80 gpm pump stations, 1,100 LF of 2-inch force main and 1-20 gpm pump station extending from Abbs Valley to Boissevain

Existing WWTP. Name: Northern Tazewell County WWTP Design Flow: 0.50 MGD Average Flow: 0.217 MGD Receiving Stream Laurel Fork Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Middle New Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 420 Commercial = 15 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very Feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $13,287,732

Cost Per Connection: $30,547

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Bishop Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

utilize septic systems and “straight pipes”.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 18,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer

extending from the Bishop area of Tazewell County to a new 60,000 GPD package WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: NA

Design Flow: NA MGD

Average Flow: NA MGD

Receiving Stream: NA

Stream Classification: NA

Impaired Stream (Y/N): NA

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Tug Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 150 Commercial = 5 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - A new wastewater treatment facility will be required. It is also anticipated that

rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $6,916,975

Cost Per Connection: $44,626

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Bishop Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents utilize septic systems and "straight pipes”.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 18,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer extending from the Bishop area of Tazewell County to a new 60,000 GPD package WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: NA Design Flow: NA MGD Average Flow: NA MGD Receiving Stream: NA Stream Classification: NA Impaired Stream (YIN): NA Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Tug impaired (Y/N): No Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 150 Commercial = 5 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Moderate - A new wastewater treatment facility will be required. It is also anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $6,916,975

Cost Per Connection: $44,626

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Red Ash Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

utilize septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 17,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer,

extending from the Red Ash area of Tazewell County to the existing Raven/Doran collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 105 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project

area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $5,199,025

Cost Per Connection: $49,515

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Red Ash Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents utilize septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 17,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, extending from the Red Ash area of Tazewell County to the existing Raven/Doran collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP.

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 105 Commercial = 0 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Very Feasible - It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout much of the project area

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $5,199,025

Cost Per Connection: $49,515

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Jewell Ridge Sewer Extension

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Therefore, residents

utilize septic systems which are constructed in poor soil conditions with shallow depth to rock.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 51,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer,

extending from the Jewell Ridge area of Tazewell County to the existing Richlands collection

system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the

existing Richlands WWTP

Existing WWTP: Name: Richlands WWTP

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 200 Commercial = 3 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems and/or "straight

pipes" are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The system will require a collection system from Richlands through Coaldan and

Seaboard. It is anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $14,978,275

Cost Per Connection: $73,785

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Jewell Ridge Sewer Extension County: Tazewell

Planning District Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: ‘Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 51,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, extending from the Jewell Ridge area of Tazewell County to the existing Richlands collection system. The sewerage generated within the project area would ultimately be conveyed to the existing Richlands WWTP

Existing WWTP. Name: Richlands WWTP. Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.182 MGD Receiving Stream: Clinch River Stream Classification: Vv Impaired Stream (YIN): Yes Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper Clinch Impaired (Y/N): Yes Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 200 Commercial = 3 Industrial= 0 Health Hazard Based on information provided by local health officials, failing septic systems andlor “straight

pipes” are present within the service area.

Construction Feasibility Moderate - The system will require a collection system from Richlands through Coaldan and ‘Seaboard. Its anticipated that rock will be encountered throughout the project area.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $14,978,275

Cost Per Connection: $73,785

APPENDIX B

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT CONVENTIONAL PROJECTS

APPENDIX B

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT CONVENTIONAL PROJECTS

TPWW

[Ú [Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú[Ú[Ú

[Ú [Ú [Ú

[Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú[Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú [Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú [Ú[Ú[Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

TPWW

[Ú [Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú[Ú[Ú

[Ú [Ú [Ú

[Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú[Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú[Ú [Ú [Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

Pennington Gap

Jonesville

St. Charles

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

1/9/2023

IJR

2248

LE E

CO U

N TY

O PO

SE D

S EW

ER EX

TE N

SI O

N S

Western Lee Sewer Project

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,00010,000

Feet

Sandy Ridge / N. Jonesville Sewer Project

Woodway / Hickory Flats Community Sewer Project

Cross Creek to Hickory Flats Sewer Project

Dryden Heights Community Sewer Project

Legend [Ú Proposed Pump Station

Proposed Force Main

Proposed Gravity Main

TPWW Existing WWTP

[Ú Existing Pump Station

Existing Manhole

Existing Gravity Main

Existing Force Main

Town Boundary

Existing ww [Existing Pump Station

@ Existing Manhole — Existing Gravity Main

Cross Creek to Hickory Flats

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

Lee County \ Aveo

~ Sandy Rie 7] oyod N Donesvie : Sener Project < Woodway / Hickory = 3] Flats Community

Sewer Project

LEE COUNTY - PROPOSED SEWER EXTENSIONS

any ‘K

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Progra, Geographic Names Information System, National Hyérography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National

Structures Dataset, and National Transporation Datse USES Gata Ecosystems: US. Census] [SORT PSSST

0 10,000 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 ‘Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of tate Humanitarian]

a a ef Information Unt; and NOAA Navona Centers for Environmental Information, US. Coastal ele Model, Data refteshes une, 2022, Teuerans reer

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Woodway/Hickory Flats Community Sewer Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Hickory Flats

Design Flow: 0.80 MGD

Average Flow: 0.28 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 710 Commercial = 25 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $41,142,075

Present Worth Per Connection: $55,976

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Documented failing septic systems with

existing septic systems over 30 years old. Many systems believed to be discharging directly to sink holes.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily

The project consists of approximately 102,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 30,000 of 4-inch force main

and 10 grinder pump station.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

roject

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Sandy Ridge/North Jonesville Community Sewer Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Hickory Flats

Design Flow: 0.80 MGD

Average Flow: 0.28 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Town Branch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 260 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $11,489,400

Present Worth Per Connection: $44,190

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Straight pipes exist.

The project consists of approximately 37,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Dyrden Heights Community Sewer Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Cross Creek

Design Flow: 0.30 MGD

Average Flow: 0.1 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 250 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,902,050

Present Worth Per Connection: $31,608

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Septic system over 30 years old.

The project consists of approximately 24,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. System could

be combined with a future project to eliminate Cross Creek WWTP and eliminate a discharge.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Western Lee Sewer Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Western Lee

Design Flow: 0.30 MGD

Average Flow: 0 MGD

Receiving Stream: Indian Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Indian Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 350 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $58,565,000

Present Worth Per Connection: $162,681

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Septic system over 30 years old.

The project consists of approximately 102,000 linear feet of gravity sewer ranging in size from 6-inch to 15-inch,

16 pump station and 70,000 linear feet of Forcemain. The project will also include the construction of a new

Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Feasible - The project will construct a new WWTP along with the collection system. U.S. Army Corp providing

initial funding for study and preliminary design. Additional funding for the construction will be available.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Cross Creek to Hickory Flats Sewer Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Hickory Flats

Design Flow: 0.80 MGD

Average Flow: 0.28 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $5,790,200

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The project will involve eliminating the Cross Creek Sewer Treatment Plant and the Town of Pennington Gap

Wastewater Treatment Plant. Sewer from each system will be pumped to Hickory Flats Sewer Treatment Plant.

The project consists of approximately 24,000 linear feet of Forcemain ranging in size from 4-inch to 6-inch and

4 pump station. This project assumes the Woodway Hickory Flats Project has been completed. Additional

pump stations and forcemains will be needed if this project has not been completed.

Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

[Ú

[Ú [Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú TPWW

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

Dungannon

Nickelsville

Gate City

Weber City

Clinchport

Duffield

Scott

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

1/16/2023

IJR

2248

SC O

TT C

O U

N TY

O PO

SE D

S EW

ER EX

TE N

SI O

N S

Duffield Route 871 Sewer Project

Daniel Boone Community Sewer Project Phase 2 & 3

Yuma Community Sewer Project Phase 2 - 4

Manville Road Community Sewer Project

Reed Hollow Community Sewer Project

Hiltons Community Sewer Project Phase 1-3

AP Carter Highway Sewer Extension Project

0 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,0007,500

Feet

Legend [Ú Proposed Pump Station

Proposed Force Main

Proposed Gravity Main

Existing Manhole

Existing Gravity Main

TPWW Existing WWTP

Existing Force Main

[Ú Existing Pump Station

Town Boundary

Legend Il Proposed Pump Station ‘©== Proposed Force Main — Proposed Gravity Main © Existing Manhole — Existing Gravity Main HH Existing wwe Existing Force Main

[Existing Pump Station ‘Town Boundary

Sewer Project

Duffield Route 871 sa

Manville Road Community Sewer Project

= ngannon ~

Reed Hollow Community Sewer Project.

‘AP Carter Highway Sewer Extension Project

Hiltons Community Sewer Project Phase 1-3

30,000 45,000

60,000

Feet

‘Yuma Community Sewer Project Phase 2-4

Mant cama

Boomingdie

State Humanitarian Infor Information US. CoabGlet Mode

Names Information ‘System, National Hysror apy Dats

{US-cenSus Bu‘eSn HGER/Lne dat; USES Rood

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SCOTT COUNTY - PROPOSED SEWER EXTENSIONS

) i.

acefreshey hing 2022

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Daniel Boone Sewer Project Phase 2-3

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Moccasin Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 186 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $13,633,750

Present Worth Per Connection: $73,300

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Documented failing septic systems with

existing septic systems over 30 years old.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily

The project consists of approximately 36,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 13,000 of 4-inch force main

and 2 grinder pump station.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Yuma Community Sewer Project Phase 2-4

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 170 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $12,493,325

Present Worth Per Connection: $73,490

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Documented failing septic systems with

existing septic systems over 30 years old.

The project consists of approximately 55,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 34,000 of 4-inch

force main and 3 sewer pump station.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

Project Name: Hiltons Community Sewer Project Phase 1-3

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 280 Commercial = 20 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $22,904,700

Present Worth Per Connection: $76,349

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system. Documented failing septic systems with

existing septic systems over 30 years old.

The project consists of approximately 55,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 34,000 of 4-inch

force main and 3 sewer pump station.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily.

Project Name: County:

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Pubic Water (YIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Design Flow. Map ‘Average Flow: McD Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification

Impaired Stream (YIN}

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: AP Carter Highway Community Sewer System

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 115 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $10,810,475

Present Worth Per Connection: $94,004

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 25,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 14,000 of 4-inch

force main and 2 sewer pump station.

Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Hiltons Phase 1-3

will need to be completed prior to this project. Project can be phased very easily.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Duffield Route 871 Sewer Extension Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Duffield

Design Flow: 0.40 MGD

Average Flow: 0.2 MGD

Receiving Stream: Cinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 65 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $5,358,925

Present Worth Per Connection: $82,445

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 17,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 500 of 2-inch force

main and 1 sewer pump station.

Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Reed Hollow Community Sewer System

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Moccasin Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 45 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,262,025

Present Worth Per Connection: $72,489

The project area is currently not served by a public water or sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 8,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 2,000 of 2-inch force

main and 1 sewer pump station.

Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Manville Community Sewer System

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Moccasin Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 45 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,137,225

Present Worth Per Connection: $69,716

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 8,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1,000 of 2-inch force

main and 1 sewer pump station.

Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

12/14/2022

IJR

2248

W IS

E CO

U N

TY

PR O

PO SE

D S

EW ER

EX TE

N SI

O N

S /

[Ú

[Ú[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú TPWW

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú[Ú

[Ú[Ú[Ú[Ú

[Ú[Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

TPWW

[Ú

[Ú [Ú [Ú

[Ú

Wise

Pound

Coeburn

Appalachia

Wise

St. Paul

Big Stone Gap

0 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,0007,500

Feet

Legend [Ú Proposed Pump Station

Proposed Gravity Main

Proposed Force Main

TPWW Existing WWTP

[Ú Existing Pump Station

Existing Manhole

Existing Force Main

Existing Gravity Main

Town Boundary

Wildcat/Irondale Community Sewer Project

East Stone Gap/Crackers Neck Community Sewer Project

Powell Valley Community Sewer Project

Hoot Owl Hollow Sewer Project

Dorchester Community Project

Upper Guest River Community Sewer Project

South Coeburn Community Sewer Project

Crab Orchard/Dry Fork/Bull Run Community Sewer Project

Timberville Acres Sewer Project

Riverview Community Sewer Project

Banner Community Sewer Project

Cranesnest Community Sewer Project

Coeburn Mountain Community Sewer Project

Glamorgan Community Sewer Project

Bold Camp Sewer Project

Indian Creek Community Sewer Project

South Fork Community Sewer Project

North Fork Community Sewer Project

Legend Proposed Pump Station ‘— Proposed Gravity Main

‘+ Proposed Force Main [Existing wwTP

[BH Existing Pump Station @ Existing Manhole

Existing Force Main — Existing Gravity Main

“8 Town Boundary

North Fork Community Sewer Project

\Wildcat/Irondale Community Sewer Project

‘South Fork Community Sewer Project

Upper Guest River Community Sewer Project No

sey

— x

Hoot Ow Hollow Sewer Project

Powell Valley Community Sewer Project

East Stone Gap/Crackers Neck Community Sewer Project

Bold Camp Sewer Project

Indian Creek Community Sewer Project

Glamorgan Community Sewer Project

Riverview Community Sewer Project

Sewer Project

Sou caer camennty |_| Sever Poked

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

WISE COUNTY - PROPOSED SEWER EXTENSIONS

= iY

Pm ‘Coeburn Mountain - Cornmunity Seve Project Cranesnest Community ie Sewer Project aad Banner Community Liege Sewer Project, ICoeburn y - ~ | crab Orchard/Dry Fork/Bull Run 4] Community Sewer Project t- Paul i %, * “ . Ko i) 7,500 15,000 30,000 45,000

ee Feet

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: East Stone Gap/Cracker Neck Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Big Stone Gap

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.575 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 473 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $18,915,325

Present Worth Per Connection: $39,990

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily

The project consists of approximately 60,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wildcat/Irondale Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Big Stone Gap

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.575 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 377 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $17,781,075

Present Worth Per Connection: $47,165

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 52,000 linear feet 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer , 1 pump station and

7,500 linear feet of 4-inch forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Coeburn Mountain Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 450 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $16,489,850

Present Worth Per Connection: $36,644

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 44,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer , 1 pump station

and 7,000 linear feet of 4-inch Forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Powell Valley Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Big Stone Gap

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.575 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Butcher Fork Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 355 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $25,769,575

Present Worth Per Connection: $72,590

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 82,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

6,000 linear feet of 6-inch Forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Glamorgan Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Sepulcher Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 50 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,449,850

Present Worth Per Connection: $48,997

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 8,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Banner Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Tom’s Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 65 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,759,925

Present Worth Per Connection: $57,845

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 11600 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

1,850 linear feet of 3-inch Forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Crab Orchard/Dry Fork/Bull Run Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Crab Orchard Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 117 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $11,303,175

Present Worth Per Connection: $96,608

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 31,500 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

9,000 linear feet of 6-inch Forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Cranesnest Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Tom’s Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 106 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,977,350

Present Worth Per Connection: $37,522

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 10,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

1,500 linear feet of 4-inch Forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. The only

current issues is the existing Town of Coeburn’s collection system which may need upgraded. Further

evaluation will be required.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Upper Guest River Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 140 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $8,924,500

Present Worth Per Connection: $63,746

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 30,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. The only

current issues is the existing Town of Coeburn’s collection system which may need upgraded. Further

evaluation will be required.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Indian Creek (Wise to Pound) Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pound

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 1.053 MGD

Receiving Stream: Pound River

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Indian Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 360 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $29,702,400

Present Worth Per Connection: $82,507

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 102,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer.

Feasible - Issues with the existing Pound Wastewater Treatment Plant will need to be corrected along with

additional treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: South Fork Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pound

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 1.053 MGD

Receiving Stream: Pound River

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: South Fork Pound Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 280 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $22,285,900

Present Worth Per Connection: $79,593

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 72,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

5,000 linear feet of 4-inch Forcemain.

Feasible - Issues with the existing Pound Wastewater Treatment Plant will need to be corrected along with

additional treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Bold Camp Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pound

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 1.053 MGD

Receiving Stream: Pound River

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: South Fork Pound Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 213 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $18,243,225

Present Worth Per Connection: $85,649

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 60,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

3,000 linear feet of 2-inch Forcemain.

Feasible - Issues with the existing Pound Wastewater Treatment Plant will need to be corrected along with

additional treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Dorchester Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 278 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $12,851,150

Present Worth Per Connection: $46,227

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 35,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer , 1 pump station

and 9,000 linear feet of 4-inch Forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Project can be

phased very easily

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: South Coeburn Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 152 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $6,817,200

Present Worth Per Connection: $44,850

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 22,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Riverview Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 63 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $1,706,575

Present Worth Per Connection: $27,088

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 5,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. Limiting factor

will be the number of connections Wise County currently has with CNW.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Timberville Acres Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 55 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,654,975

Present Worth Per Connection: $84,636

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 8,500 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

10,500 linear feet of 4-inch Forcemain.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity. The project will

require the upgrade of the Sheffield Acres Pump Station #1.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: North Fork Community Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pound

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 1.053 MGD

Receiving Stream: Pound River

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: North Fork Pound Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 164 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $19,085,300

Present Worth Per Connection: $116,374

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 62,000 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer, 1 pump station and

6,000 linear feet of 4-inch forcemain.

Feasible - Issues with the existing Pound Wastewater Treatment Plant will need to be corrected along with

additional treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

Project Name: Hoot Owl Hollow Sewer Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 25 Commercial = Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,719,275

Present Worth Per Connection: $108,771

The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

The project consists of approximately 9,500 linear feet of 8-inch and smaller gravity sewer.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Project Name: County:

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Pubic Water (YIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: Meo

‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification

Impaired Sveam (YIN):

APPENDIX B

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT CONVENTIONAL PROJECTS

APPENDIX B

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT

CONVENTIONAL PROJECTS

vinGINia

BLAND

Legend

@ Proposed Sewer Project USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dotaset. 3DEP Elevation Program, GeographiteNomies Information Sy

= ~ Dataset, National Land Cover Datatiase, Nativnal Structures Dataset, andl Nationat Transportation Dataset: USGS Gk_ 0 4,000 8,000 16,000 24,000 32,000 |, Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road data: Natufal Earth Data- US, Department of State HiU; NOAA National Centers’to

a as

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Bland Sewer System

County: Bland

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Bland County Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 50,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer and a 0.2 MGD treatment facility.

Existing WWTP: Name: NA Design Flow: NA MGD Average Flow: NA MGD Receiving Stream: NA Stream Classification: NA Impaired Stream (Y/N): NA

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Crab Orchard Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 202 Commercial = 43 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems and high groundwater table.

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The project will require the construction of a new treatment facility.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $17,538,625

Present Worth Per Connection: $71,586

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ultity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name: Grab Orchard Creek Impaired (YIN); No Residential = 202 Commercial= 48. Industrial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rocky Gap Sewer Extension

County: Bland

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Bland County Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 10,500 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 18,800 linear feet of 4-inch force main and one pump station.

Existing WWTP: Name: Bastian WWTP Design Flow: 0.20 MGD Average Flow: 0.05 MGD Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Laurel Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 71 Commercial = 18 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems.

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $6,691,815

Present Worth Per Connection: $75,189

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ultity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name: — baurel Creek Impaired (YIN); Yes Residential = Th Commercial= 18 Industrial=

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

2/1/2023

IJR

2248

CA R R O

LL C

O U

N TY

O PO

SE D

S EW

ER EX

TE N

SI O

N S

TPWW

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

TPWW

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú[Ú[Ú[Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

Hillsville

Wytheville

Fries

0 15,000 30,000 45,0007,500

Feet

Legend TPWW Existing WWTP

[Ú Existing Pump Station

Existing Manhole

Existing Force Main

Existing Gravity Main

Proposed Extension

Town Boundary

CANA Extensions

existing ww

[BB _Bxisting Pump Station i | © Existing Manhole Existing Force Main — Existing Gravity Main

@ Proposed Extension Town Boundary

CANA Extensions

0 7,500 15,000 30,000 45,000

ee Fect

‘USGS The National Maps National Boundaries Ostaset, 0c Eevaton Program) Geographic Nines Information System National Hydrography Oataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset and National Tansportation Dataset» USGS Glabal Ecosystems US. Censug Bureau TIGERLine datg, USFS Road Ona. Natral Earth Data, US. Deparment of Stat Humanitarian Information Units and NOBA National Centers fr Environmental Infrmation, US. Coastal Rte Model. Dats eres tune, 2022 —ee

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

CARROLL COUNTY - PROPOSED SEWER EXTENSIONS

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Cana/I77 Sewer Extension

County: Carroll

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Carroll County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 17,500 linear feet of 10-inch gravity sewer, 118,000 linear feet of 8- inch gravity sewer, 30,500 linear feet 4-inch force main and four pump stations.

Existing WWTP: Name: Mt. Airy Design Flow: MGD Average Flow: MGD Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Brushy Fork Impaired (Y/N): No Lovills Creek No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 310 Commercial = 50 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The project connects to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity; however, an intermunicipal agreement will be required between the County and Mt. Airy.

Growth Potential: Residential - High Commercial - Moderate/High Industrial - Moderate/High

Total Project Cost: $43,878,250

Present Worth Per Connection: $121,884

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ultity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

ame Design Fw woo

fege Few web

rovoug Steam:

Steam Casizaion

Impaired Stream (Vit

_ a oe a

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

2/1/2023

IJR

2248

/ G

R AY

SO N

C O

U N

TY

PR O

PO SE

D S

EW ER

EX TE

N SI

O N

TPWW [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

TPWW

[Ú

Troutdale Fries

Independence

0 22,000 44,000 66,000 88,00011,000

Feet

Legend [Ú Existing Pump Station

TPWW Existing WWTP

Existing Manhole

Existing Force Main

Existing Gravity Main

Proposed Extension

Town Boundary

Elk Creek

Independence North

Independence South Fairview Extension

Providence Extensions

Stevens Creek Extensions

Galax

Legend [H_Existing Pump Station existing wwtP @ Existing Manhole =| = =~ Existing Force Main — Existing Gravity Main @ Proposed Extension Town Boundary

LetWILDERNESS’

SER ON COUNTY

WILJERNESS

oe i “ty RAGGOON 7 ~ y 2 san ar

eS Zune witson { CREEK WIL DERNESS

0 11,000 22,000 44,000 66,000

Feet

88,000

GRAYSON? COUNTY.

Independence North

Independence South

LITTLE SF ae DRYeRUN WILDERNESS

Elk Creek

‘Stevens Creek Extensions

Providence Extensions

Fairview Extension

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 20EP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Oataset, National Land Cover Database, Nabonal Structures Dataset, and Nationa Transporation Datazet; USGS Global Ecosystems; US. Census Bureay TIGER/Lne dts USFS Road Data; Natural Fath Data: US. Deparment of State Humanitarian Information Unt and NORA

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

GRAYSON COUNTY - PROPOSED SEWER EXTENSIONS

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Elk Creek Sewer Extension

County: Grayson

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Grayson County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 36,400 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer and a 0.025 treatment facility.

Existing WWTP: Name: NA Design Flow: NA MGD Average Flow: NA MGD Receiving Stream: NA Stream Classification: NA Impaired Stream (Y/N): NA

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Elk Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 85 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The project will require the construction of a new treatment facility.

Growth Potential: Residential - High Commercial - Moderate/High Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $10,889,880

Present Worth Per Connection: $128,116

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name: — BkCreek Impaired (YIN): NO Residential = 85 Commercial= 0 Industril=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Fairview Sewer Extension

County: Grayson

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Grayson County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes, majority of service area

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 12,600 linear feet of 12-inch gravity sewer, 27,200 linear feet of 10-inch gravity sewer, 102,800 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 6,000 linear feet of 2-inch force main and one pump station.

Existing WWTP: Name: Galax WWTP Design Flow: 3.00 MGD Average Flow: 1.82 MGD Receiving Stream: New River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Chestnut Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 331 Commercial = 4 Industrial =

Health Hazards: High ground water table and located upstream of raw water supply

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The proposed project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - High Commercial - Moderate/High Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $42,060,460

Present Worth Per Connection: $125,554

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name: Chestnut Greek Impaired (YIN): Yes Residential = 881 Gommercial= 4 Industrial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Independence North/South Sewer Extension

County: Grayson

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Grayson County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Existing WWTP: Name: Independence WWTP Design Flow: 0.25 MGD Average Flow: 0.17 MGD Receiving Stream: Peach Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Peach Bottom Creek Impaired (Y/N): No Brush Creek No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 134 Commercial = 4 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The proposed project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - High Commercial - Moderate/High Industrial - Moderate/High

Total Project Cost: $42,060,460

Present Worth Per Connection: $304,786

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

Residential = 134 Commercial= 4 Industrial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Providence Sewer Extension

County: Grayson

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Grayson County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 58,200 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 9,200 linear feet of 4-inch force main and 2 pump stations.

Existing WWTP: Name: Fries WWTP Design Flow: 0.22 MGD Average Flow: 0.09 MGD Receiving Stream: New River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Stevens Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 247 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 1

Health Hazards: High groundwater table and failing septic systems

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The proposed project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity; however, low public support is anticipated.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate/High Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $18,040,100

Present Worth Per Connection: $69,923

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name: Stevens Creek Impaired (YIN); NO Residential = 247 Commercial= 10 Industril=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Stevens Creek/Eagles Bottom Sewer Extension

County: Grayson

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Grayson County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 40,800 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Existing WWTP: Name: Fries WWTP Design Flow: 0.22 MGD Average Flow: 0.09 MGD Receiving Stream: New River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Eagle Bottom Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 201 Commercial = 1 Industrial =

Health Hazards: Failing septic systems and located upstream of raw water supply

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The proposed project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $11,085,360

Present Worth Per Connection: $54,878

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name: Eagle Bottom Creek Impaired (YIN); NO Residential = 201 Gommercial= 1 Industrial=

TPWW [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú[Ú [Ú

[Ú

[Ú [Ú[Ú

[Ú [Ú

Saltville

Chilhowie

Marion

SO U

TH W

ES T

VI R G

IN IA

CO M

PR EH

EN SI

VE R

EG IO

N AL

SE W

ER S

TU D

Y 20

DATE:

SHEET:

DRAWN BY CHECKED BY

PROJECT NO.

2/1/2023

IJR

2248

Watson Gap/ North Holston Extension

SM YT

H C

O U

N TY

O PO

SE D

S EW

ER EX

TE N

SI O

N S

0 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,0007,500

Feet

Legend [Ú Existing Pump Station

Existing Force Main

Existing Manhole

Existing Gravity Main

Proposed Extension

Town Boundary

Pleasant Heights/ Midway Extension

Middle Fork Extension

Hungry Mother Extension

Currin Valley Extension

Groseclose Extension

Watson Gap/ North Holston Extension

Pleasant Heights/ Midway Extension

7,500 15,000

30,000 45,000 60,000

Feet &

Middle Fork

Legend Existing Pump Station Existing Force Main © Existing Manhole

— Existing Gravity Main @ Proposed Extension Town Boundary

‘Gurrin Valley, Extension

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL SEWER STUDY 2022

SMYTH COUNTY - PROPOSED SEWER EXTENSIONS

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Currin Valley

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions There are several residences with straigt pipe discharges and failing on site sewer systems

as reported by the Health Department.

Proposed Project It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the small community of Currin Valley. Treatment can be provided at the Marion/Smyth

County Regional POTW. All service connections are residential and can be served by 8" gravity

sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on State Route 16.

Existing WWTP: Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional

Design Flow = 3.4 MGD

Average Flow = 1.9 MGD

Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Staley Creek Impaired= No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 112 Commercial = 2 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

The watershed stream is adjacent to the town of Marion spring water source.

Construction Feasibility Numberous rock excavation is anticipated .

Growth Potential This area is bordered buy the Jefferson National Forest and significant future development is limited

There is potential for sparse future developemnt on vacant lands off state roads

Total Project Cost 4,234,039.00$

Present Worth Per Connection $37,141

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

Currin Valley

Smyth

Mt Rogers

Smyth County Board of Supervisors Yes

There are several residences with straigt pipe discharges and failing on site sewer systems as reported by the Health Department.

Its proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection system for the small community of Currin Valley. Treatment can be provided at the Marion/Smyth County Regional POTW. All service connections are residential and can be served by 8" gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on State Route 16.

Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional

Design Flow 34 MGD

‘Average Flow 49 MGD

Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River

Stream Classificatioy \V

Impaired Stream Yes

Name = Staley Creek Impaired= No

Residential = 442 Commercial = 2 Industrial = 0)

Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface. The watershed stream is adjacent to the town of Marion spring water source.

Numberous rock excavation is anticipated

This area is bordered buy the Jefferson National Forest and significant future development is limit

There is potential for sparse future developemnt on vacant lands off state roads

$ 4,234,039.00

$37,141

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Groseclose

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions The existing on site sewer systems have failed numerous times. Although the failure

locations are sporadic we suspect the problem is widespread with unseen ground water impacts.

Businesses have been forced to close and others have been prevented from expanding

Proposed Project It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system throughout the Groseclose community. Treatment can be provided at the Marion/Smyth

County Regional POTW. All of the homes, business and industries can be served a gravity

collection system. The collection system will consist of 12,10, and 8-inch gravity lines with manholes.

Existing WWTP: Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional

Design Flow = 3.4 MGD

Average Flow = 1.9 MGD

Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Middle Fork Holston River Impaired= Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 208 Commercial = 2 Industrial = 5

Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

The receiving stream has been identified as impaired from fecal coliform sources by DEQ

Construction Feasibility The predominant soils are alluvial and should not pose a problem with excavation.

The Middle Fork Holston River has been identified as habitat for endangered species.

Several sewer pipe stream crossings will be needed but should not pose a problem to

construction provided good construction practices are used to control erosion and sedimentation

Growth Potential Due to the location along I-81 and US Rt 11 and the Mt Empire Airport we feel this area has

a high growth potential if adequate sewer collection is provided.

Total Project Cost 9,733,248.00$

Present Worth Per Connection $45,271

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

Groseclose

Smyth

Mt Rogers

Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Yes

The existing on site sewer systems have failed numerous times. Although the failure

locations are sporadic we suspect the problem is widespread with unseen ground water impacts. Businesses have been forced to close and others have been prevented from expanding

Its proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection system throughout the Groseclose community. Treatment can be provided at the Marion/Smyth

County Regional POTW. Alll of the homes, business and industries can be served a gravity collection system. The collection system will consist of 12,10, and 8-inch gravity lines with manho

Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional Design Flow 34 MGD

Average Flow= 1.9 + MGD

Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River

Stream Classification= IV

Impaired Stream Yes

Name = Middle Fork Holston River Impaired= Yes

Residential 208 = Commercial = 2 Industrial 5

Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface. The receiving stream has been identified as impaired from fecal coliform sources by DEQ

The predominant soils are alluvial and should not pose a problem with excavation ‘The Middle Fork Holston River has been identified as habitat for endangered species.

Several sewer pipe stream crossings will be needed but should not pose a problem to ‘construction provided good construction practices are used to control erosion and sedimentation Due to the location along I-81 and US Rt 11 and the Mt Empire Airport we feel this area has

a high growth potential if adequate sewer collection is provided.

$ 9,733,248.00

$45,271

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Hungry Mother

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions There are several year round and seasonal occupied residences adjacent to the State Park

that experience failing on site sewer septic systems.

Proposed Project It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the small community adjacent to the state park. Treatment can be provided at the Marion/Smyth

County Regional POTW. All service connections are residential and can be served by 8" gravity

sewer lines and manholes connected to the state park sewage pumping station.

Existing WWTP: Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional

Design Flow = 3.4 MGD

Average Flow = 1.9 MGD

Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Hungry Mother Lake Impaired= Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 48 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

The receiving stream has been identified as impaired from fecal coliform sources by DEQ

Construction Feasibility The predominant soils are alluvial and should not pose a problem with excavation

some rock excavation is anticipated although. Most lines will be located on private property.

Growth Potential This area is bordered buy the state park system and future development is limited

We feel future growth will be limited to no more than a few households

Total Project Cost 2,245,534.00$

Present Worth Per Connection $46,782

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

Hungry Mother Smyth

Mt Rogers

Smyth County Board of Supervisors Yes

There are several year round and seasonal occupied residences adjacent to the State Park that experience failing on site sewer septic systems.

Its proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection system for the small community adjacent to the state park. Treatment can be provided at the Mari ‘County Regional POTW. All service connections are residential and can be served by 8" gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to the state park sewage pumping station.

Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional Design Flow 34 MGD

‘Average Flow 49 MGD

Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River

Stream Classificatioy \V

Impaired Stream Yes

Name = Hungry Mother Lake Impaired= Yes

Residential = 48 Commercial = 0 Industrial = °

Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface. The receiving stream has been identified as impaired from fecal coliform sources by DEQ

The predominant soils are alluvial and should not pose a problem with excavation some rock excavation is anticipated although. Most lines will be located on private property.

This area is bordered buy the state park system and future development is limited We feel future growth will be limited to no more than a few households

$ 2,245,534.00

$46,782

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Middle Fork

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Residential area located north of Chilhowie. The County has received multiple citizen requests for sewer service - some due to existing septic system failures and/or unsuitable soils for convetional septic systems as weel as some requests to enable ne building site development

Proposed Project Gravity sewer extensions connecting to the Town of Chilhowie’s collection and treatment system. Construction would include approximately 18,000 LF of 8" gravity sewer line and appurtenances serving 74 residential homes

Existing WWTP: Name = Chilhowie Regional Design Flow = 0.999 MGD Average Flow = 0.264 MGD Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River Stream Classification = IV Impaired Stream No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Middle Fork Holston River Impaired= No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 74 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Sporadic occurrence of failing septic systems and soils unsuitable for conventional septic.

Construction Feasibility Service can be provided to this area by gravity sewer line extensions. Extensive bedrock is not anticipated. A number of small stream and secondary road crossings will be needed as well as one railroad crossing.

Growth Potential Project area is located in close proximity to the Town of Chilhowie. This area of Smyth County has seen positive residential growth

Total Project Cost $5,299,450

Cost Per Connection $71,614

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: ‘Middle Fork County: Smyth Planning District: ‘MtRoges Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Super Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions

— St ena a goo

Existing WWTP: Name = ‘egional Design Flow MGD ‘Average Flow MGD

Receiving Stream = ‘Stream Classification

Impaired Stream

Watershed or Adjacent Steam Name = Midele Fork Holston River Impaved= No Equivalent Customers Served: Residential= 74 += Commercial= = 0 ~—Industrial= =O

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Pleasant Heights Midway

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions There are residences with straight pipe discharges and failing on site sewer systems.

Proposed Project It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the communities of Midway and Pleasant Heights Valley. Treatment can be provided

Saltville Smyth County Regional POTW. All service connections are residential and can be served

by 8" gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on McHenrys Creek.

Existing WWTP: Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional

Design Flow = 0.5 MGD

Average Flow = 0.46 MGD

Receiving Stream = North Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream Yes from Mercury contamination

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = North Fork Holston River Impaired= No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 143 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility Sporadic rock excavation is anticipated . I/I reductions will be needed within the town

collection system. The existing treatment plant is currently under construction

to expand capacity to 1.0 mgd with completion date 2005.

Growth Potential There are considerable vacant land areas that could experience future development.

Total Project Cost 5,864,393.00$

Present Worth Per Connection $38,329

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

Pleasant Heights Midway

Smyth

Mt Rogers

Smyth County Board of Supervisors Yes

There are residences with straight pipe discharges and failing on site sewer systems.

Its proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection system for the communities of Midway and Pleasant Heights Valley. Treatment can be provided

Saltville Smyth County Regional POTW. All service connections are residential and can be servec by 8" gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on McHenrys Creek.

Name = Marion/Smyth County Regional Design Flow 05 MGD

‘Average Flow 0.48 MGD

Receiving Stream = North Fork Holston River

Stream Classificatior Vv

Impaired Stream Yes from Mercury contamination

Name = North Fork Holston River Impaired= No

Residential = 143 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0)

Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

‘Sporadic rock excavation is anticipated . I/I reductions will be needed within the town collection system. The existing treatment plant is currently under construction to expand capacity to 1.0 mgd with completion date 2005.

There are considerable vacant land areas that could experience future development.

$ 5,864,393.00

$38,329

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Watson Gap North Holston

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions There are residences with straight pipe discharges and failing on site sewer systems.

Proposed Project It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the communities of Watson Gap and North Holston. Treatment can be provided at

Saltville Smyth County Regional POTW. Service connections are predominantly residential and

can be served by 8" gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on

McHenry’s Creek.

Existing WWTP: Name = Town of Saltville

Design Flow = 0.5 MGD

Average Flow = 0.46 MGD

Receiving Stream = North Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream Yes from Mercury contamination

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = North Fork Holston River Impaired= No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 183 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility Sporadic rock excavation is anticipated . I/I reductions will be needed within the town

collection system. The existing treatment plant is currently under construction

to expand capacity to 1.0 mgd with completion date 2005.

Growth Potential Future development in the North Holston community will be limited due to floodplain and

steep topography. The Watson Gap area has potential for growth on current vacant lands.

Total Project Cost 9,230,945.00$

Present Worth Per Connection $47,829

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Watson Gap North Holston

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions There are residences with straight pipe discharges and failing on site sewer systems. Proposed Project Its proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the communities of Watson Gap and North Holston. Treatment can be provided at Saltville Smyth County Regional POTW. Service connections are predominantly residential and can be served by 8" gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on McHenry’s Creek.

Existing WWTP: Name = Town of Saltville Design Flow 05 MGD ‘Average Flow 0.48 MGD Receiving Stream = North Fork Holston River Stream Classificatior \v Impaired Stream Yes from Mercury contamination Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = North Fork Holston River Impaired= No Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 183 Commercial = 10 Industrial = ° Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface. Construction Feasibility ‘Sporadic rock excavation is anticipated . I/I reductions will be needed within the town

collection system. The existing treatment plant is currently under construction to expand capacity to 1.0 mgd with completion date 2005.

Growth Potential Future development in the North Holston community will be limited due to floodplain and steep topography. The Watson Gap area has potential for growth on current vacant lands.

Total Project Cost $ 9,230,945.00

Present Worth Per Connection $47,829

%, Ps he oS 2 mENY NS

| CLINCHBURG es

BENHAMS ROAD

orem

MOCK HOLLOW | re

tounty ef _ | DAMASCUS AREA

@ Proposed Sewer Project

ae Vs

Zo E FeT ee : z 6,500 13,000 26,000 39,000 52,000 x = a 5. E Feet gl/. eae a = S = =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Benhams Road

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: The local health department identified the Benhams Road area with failing on-site sewer systems. This area of the county is experiencing growth and sewer service is needed for growth to continue.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection along Benhams Road. Treatment can be provided at the Bristol, TN POTW through connection to existing sewer main south I-81. All of the homes and businesses can be served by a gravity collection system consisting of 8-inch gravity lines with manholes. A pumping station will be needed to convey wastewater to the existing collector system from the
northern section of Benhams Road.

Existing WWTP: Name = BVUB Design Flow = 15 MGD Average Flow = 10.7 MGD Receiving Stream = Boone Lake Stream Classification = IV Impaired Stream no

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Abrahams & Mumpower Creeks Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 325 Commercial = 5 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: None documented.

Construction Feasibility: Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground
utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree. We do not anticipate excessive rock although some rock excavation may be encountered.

Growth Potential: This community is located in a rapidly growing area of Washington County. High residential growths are occurring in the area. Potential for new growth is high.

Total Project Cost: 12,595,671$

Present Worth Per Connection: $38,169

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Benhams Road County: Washington Planning District MURogers Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

cate Soe erat etreteneteeeeee

_ —————

Existing WWTP: Name = Design Flow ‘Average Flow Receiving Stream = Stream Classificatior Impaired Stream

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Abrahams & Mumpower Greeks Impaired= no 0

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential= 325. Commercial= Industrial Health Hazard: None documented.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost ($12,595,671 Present Worth Per Connection: $98,469

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Buchanan Road

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: There are residences with straight pipe discharges and failing on-site sewer systems.

Community is located in northwest section of county near Saltville.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the Buchanan Road community. Treatment can be provided at Saltville/Smyth

County Regional POTW. Service connections are predominantly residential and can be served

by 8-inch gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on McHenry’s

Creek and to the proposed Old Mill project at the western project boundary.

Existing WWTP: Name = Town of Saltville

Design Flow = 0.5 MGD

Average Flow = 0.46 MGD

Receiving Stream = North Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes, mercury contamination

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Keywood Branch Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 27 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility: Rock excavation is anticipated. I/I reductions will be needed within the town collection system.

The existing treatment plant is currently under construction to expand capacity to 1.0 mgd

with completion date 2005.

Growth Potential: Future development in the Buchanan Road community will be limited due to steep topography.

Total Project Cost: $2,153,174

Present Worth Per Connection: $79,747

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name’ County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility,

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name = Design Flow ‘Average Flow = Receiving Stream = Stream Classification Impaired Stream

Nam

Keywood Branch Impaired a Residential= 27. Commercial= 0 Industrial,

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Clinchburg

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: There are residences with straight pipe discharges and failing on-site sewer systems.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the Clinchburg community. Treatment can be provided at Saltville/ Smyth County

Regional POTW. Service connections are predominantly residential and can be served by

8-inch gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on McHenry’s

Creek. A sewer pump station will be needed to convey wastewater flows into the Saltville

collection system.

Existing WWTP: Name = Town of Saltville

Design Flow = 0.5 MGD

Average Flow = 0.46 MGD

Receiving Stream = North Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes, mercury contamination

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Stonemill Creek Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 94 Commercial = 5 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility: Sporadic rock excavation is anticipated. I/I reductions will be needed within the town

collection system. The existing treatment plant is currently under construction to expand

capacity to 1.0 mgd with completion date 2005.

Growth Potential: Future development in the Clinchburg community will be limited due to floodplain and

steep topography.

Total Project Cost: $5,046,008

Present Worth Per Connection: $50,970

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name = Design Flow Average Flow

Receiving Stream ‘Stream Classification = Impaired Stream

Name = Stonemill Creek Impaire Residential= 94 Commercial= —« S—Industial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Damascus Area

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: The service area is located south and east of Damascus and is desired for future industrial

development.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

from the existing sewer line along Routes 91 and 716. Treatment can be provided at the

Damascus POTW. All future connections can be served by a gravity collection system

consisting of 8-inch gravity lines with manholes.

Existing WWTP: Name = Damascus STP

Design Flow = 0.25 MGD

Average Flow = 0.3 MGD

Receiving Stream = South Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Laurel Creek Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 14 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: None documented.

Construction Feasibility: Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground

utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree.

Rock excavation is anticipated.

Growth Potential: The primary purpose of the project is to serve future industrial park currently undeveloped.

Total Project Cost: 1,047,559$

Present Worth Per Connection: $74,826

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Serves:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name = Design Flow ‘Average Flow Receiving Stream = Stream Classification Impaired Stream

Name = Laurel Creek = Impaired= no Residential= 14 Commercial= «0 industrial= 0 ‘None documented.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Mock Hollow

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: The service area is located east of Damascus and is desired for existing residences with

. inadequate sewer treatment.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

from the existing sewer lines along Fourth Street. Treatment can be provided at the Damascus

POTW. All future connections can be served by a gravity collection system consisting of

8-inch gravity lines with manholes.

Existing WWTP: Name = Damascus STP

Design Flow = 0.25 MGD

Average Flow = 0.3 MGD

Receiving Stream = South Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Laurel Creek Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 21 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: None documented.

Construction Feasibility: Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground

utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree.

Rock excavation is anticipated. Excessive I/I problems at the Damascus STP will need to be

addressed and are not included in total project costs.

Growth Potential: Future growth is limited due to topographical restraints.

Total Project Cost: 686,520$

Present Worth Per Connection: $32,691

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name “Mock Hollow County: Washington Planning District: MURogers Utlty Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? = Yess

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name = Design Flow ‘Average Flow Receiving Stream Stream Classification Impaired Stream Watershed or Adjacent Stream; Namo = ‘Laurel Creek = Impaired= no Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 24 Commercial= | 0 Industial= 0 Health Hazard: ‘None documented. Construction Feasibility Growth Potential: Future growth is limited due to topographical restraints. Total Project Cost: “$686,520.

Present Worth Per Connection: $3,691

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: East Central

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions The existing on-site sewer systems have failed numerous times within the service area.

The existing area is located in central eastern Washington County in the communities of

Greenway Creek, Cedar Creek, Blacksburg, Hwy. 91, and Exit 32.

Proposed Project It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection.

Treatment can be provided at the Hall Creek POTW.

All existing residences, businesses and industries can be served by a sewer collection system

consisting of 8-inch gravity lines, manholes and 9 pump stations and sewer force mains. A

series of pumping stations will be needed to convey wastewater to the existing collector system

due to the steep elevation difference.

Existing WWTP: Name = Hall Creek

Design Flow = 0.6 MGD

Average Flow = 0.42 MGD

Receiving Stream = Hall Creek

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes, fecal coliform

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Hall Creek Impaired= yes, fecal coliform

Indian Run no

Tattle Branch no

Hutton Creek yes, fecal coliform

Cedar Creek yes, fecal coliform

Greenway Creek no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 783 Commercial = 35 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose the public to raw sewage at ground surface.

The receiving streams have been identified as impaired from fecal coliform sources by DEQ.

Construction Feasibility Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground

utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree.

We do not anticipate excessive rock although some rock excavation may be encountered.

Growth Potential These communities are located in potential moderate growth areas and could experience

high residential growths if adequate sewer service were available.

Total Project Cost 52,415,738$

Present Worth Per Connection $64,078

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP: Name Design Flow ‘Average Flow = Receiving Stream Stream Classification Impaired Stream

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential= 783. Commercial= | 35 Industril= | 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: High Meadows

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: The existing on-site sewer systems have failed numerous times within the High Meadows

Subdivision and nearby mobile home park. The community is located off Highpoint Road

east of Bristol, VA in the southern portion of Washington County.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system throughout the High Meadows community. Treatment can be provided at the Bristol

Tenn POTW through connection to existing sewer main in Sinking Creek. All of the homes,

businesses and industries can be served by a gravity collection system consisting of

8-inch gravity lines with manholes.

Existing WWTP: Name = BVUB

Design Flow = 15 MGD

Average Flow = 10.7 MGD

Receiving Stream = Middle Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream no

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Boone Lake Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 170 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface. The receiving stream

has been identified as impaired from fecal coliform sources by DEQ.

Construction Feasibility: We feel the occurrence of rock to be low. New sewer main construction will be located along

existing street rights of way and previously disturbed areas of subdivision construction.

Growth Potential: The community is located at the upper extremes of the drainage shed and although growth

can occur in the area, future connections to this sewer system are limited.

Total Project Cost: $6,933,150

Present Worth Per Connection: $40,783

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: ‘High Meadows County: Washington Planning District: MURogers Utlty Provider: Washington County Service Authority Served by Public Water? Yess — Leetooeeen iecmamyacconaemnas ~~ ——— Existing WWTP: Name = Design Flow Average Flow Receiving Stream = Stream Classification Impaired Stream

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = ‘Boone Lake == Impaired= no Equivalent Customers Served: Residential= 170 Commercial= _—«—Industrial=

Health Hazard

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Larwood

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: The community is located north of Bristol and is experiencing a number of septic system

problems.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

from the subdivision development to an existing sewer line on Wagner Road. Treatment can be

provided at the Bristol, TN POTW. All of the homes, businesses and industries can be served

by a gravity collection system consisting of 8-inch gravity lines and manholes.

Existing WWTP: Name = BVUB

Design Flow = 15 MGD

Average Flow = 10.7 MGD

Receiving Stream = Boone Lake

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream no

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Steel Creek Tributary Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 123 Commercial = 3 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility: Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground

utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree.

We do not anticipate excessive rock although some rock excavation may be encountered.

Growth Potential: This community located just north of Bristol along I-81 is a rapidly growing area of Washington

County. High residential growths are projected for the area.

Total Project Cost: 4,952,343$

Present Worth Per Connection: $39,304

ROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name ‘Larwood County: Washington Planning District: MURogers Utlty Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

— See ne

Existing Conditions:

Existing WWTP: Name = Design Flow ‘Average Flow Receiving Stream Stream Classification Impaired Stream Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = “Steel Creek Tributary Impaire a Equivalent Customers Served: Residential= 123. Commercial= ——3_—_—ndustial Health Hazard:

Chatssnscnpaneonmeuyueone — irra ranches ong

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Old Mill Road

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: There are residences with failing on-site sewer systems.

The community is located in the northwest section of the county near Saltville.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

system for the Old Mill community. Treatment can be provided at Saltville/Smyth County

Regional POTW. Service connections are predominantly residential and can be served by

8-inch gravity sewer lines and manholes connected to existing gravity sewers on McHenry’s

Creek and to the proposed Clinchburg project at the western project boundary.

Existing WWTP: Name = Town of Saltville

Design Flow = 0.5 MGD

Average Flow = 0.46 MGD

Receiving Stream = North Fork Holston River

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes, mercury contamination

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Keywood Branch Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 27 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility: Rock excavation is anticipated. I/I reductions will be needed within the town collection

system. The existing treatment plant is currently under construction to expand capacity

to 1.0 mgd with completion date 2005.

Growth Potential: Future development in the Old Mill community will be limited due to floodplain and steep

topography.

Total Project Cost: $3,018,540

Present Worth Per Connection: $111,798

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name County

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name = Design Flow Average Flow Receiving Stream Stream Classification = Impaired Stream

Name = Keywood Branch Impaired= no Residential= 27. Commercial= = 0—Industrial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rush Creek

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions The existing on-site sewer systems have required repairs within the service area.

Proposed Project It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection.

Treatment can be provided at the Hall Creek POTW.

All existing residences can be served by a sewer collection system

consisting of 8-inch gravity lines, manholes and 3 pump stations and sewer force mains. A

series of pumping stations will be needed to convey wastewater to the existing collector system

due to the steep elevation difference.

Existing WWTP: Name = Hall Creek

Design Flow = 0.6 MGD

Average Flow = 0.42 MGD

Receiving Stream = Hall Creek

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes, fecal coliform

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name = Rush Creek Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 28 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard Failing septic systems expose the public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground

utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree.

Growth Potential The communit is in a low growth potential areas due to isolation

Total Project Cost 3,140,200$

Present Worth Per Connection $112,150

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP: Name Design Flow ‘Average Flow = Receiving Stream Stream Classification Impaired Stream

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = Commercial

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Seven Springs

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: The existing on-site sewer systems have failed numerous times within the service area.

The existing area is located in the northeast area of the county near the Town of Glade Spring.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection.

Treatment can be provided at the Hall Creek POTW.

All existing residences, businesses and industries can be served by a sewer collection system

consisting of 8-inch gravity lines and manholes.

Existing WWTP: Name = Hall Creek WWTP

Design Flow = 0.63 MGD

Average Flow = 0.34 MGD

Receiving Stream = Hall Creek

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream no

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Tributary to Hutton Creek Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 36 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility: Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way.

Growth Potential: Growth potential is estimated low for this area of the county.

Total Project Cost: 2,879,429$

Present Worth Per Connection: $79,984

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name’ County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazara

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name = Design Flow ‘Average Flow = Receiving Stream Stream Classification Impaired Stream

Name =

Residential

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Spoon Gap Road

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: The existing on-site sewer systems have failed numerous times within the service area.

The existing area is located south of Abingdon.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection.

Treatment can be provided at the Abingdon/Washington County POTW.

All existing residences can be served by a sewer collection system consisting of 8-inch gravity

lines and manholes, 3 pump stations and sewer force mains. A series of pumping stations will

be needed to convey wastewater to the existing collector system due to the steep elevation

difference.

Existing WWTP: Name = Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Design Flow = 2.75 MGD

Average Flow = 1.92 MGD

Receiving Stream = Wolf Creek

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream yes, fecal coliform

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Spoon Gap Creek Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 25 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: Failing septic systems expose public to raw sewage at ground surface.

Construction Feasibility: Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground

utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree.

We do not anticipate excessive rock although some rock excavation may be encountered.

Growth Potential: This community is located in a rapidly growing area of Washington County.

High residential growths are occurring in the area.

Total Project Cost: 2,742,852$

Present Worth Per Connection: $109,714

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name’ County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibil

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name = Design Flow = ‘Average Flow Receiving Stream Stream Classification =

Impaired Stream

Name =

Residential

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wyndale

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions: An extension of the existing sewer collection system is needed for future growth and service to

existing residences along Clear Creek.

Proposed Project: It is proposed that the sewerage problem be addressed by installing a centralized collection

along Clear Creek Road. Treatment can be provided at the Bristol, TN POTW through

connection to existing sewer main in Sinking Creek. All of the homes, businesses and industries

can be served by a gravity collection system consisting of 8-inch gravity lines with manholes.

A series of pumping stations will be needed to convey wastewater to the existing collector

system.

Existing WWTP: Name = BVUB

Design Flow = 15 MGD

Average Flow = 10.7 MGD

Receiving Stream = Boone Lake

Stream Classification = IV

Impaired Stream no

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = Clear Creek Impaired= no

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 48 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard: None documented.

Construction Feasibility: Construction will be located along existing developed public rights of way. Existing underground

utilities may conflict with future sewer line construction and hamper construction to a degree.

We do not anticipate excessive rock although some rock excavation may be encountered.

Growth Potential: This community is located in a rapidly growing area of Washington County.

High residential growths are occurring in the area. Potential for 138 new residences is planned

at Wallace Meadow Estates.

Total Project Cost: 1,935,056$

Present Worth Per Connection: $40,314

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name County

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Name = Design Flow Average Flow Receiving Stream = ‘Stream Classificatior Impaired Stream

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name = ‘Clear Creek ————Impaied= no

Equivalent Customers Serves:

Health Hazard:

Construction Feasibility

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection: $40,314

Residential= 4B Commercial= 0 ndustrial= =O

WYTHEVILLE EAST

Legend oS ee A ij

@ Proposed Sewer Project

0 4,000 8,000 16,000 24,000 32,000 40,000

a ed Feet] oo

POPLAR CAMP/ FOSTER FALLS

USGS The Dataset, Buresu GER

ahr Database, National Siuctures Dataset, and National Sate USFS Ros0 Dats Natal Fath Dita: US Department of State

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Barren Springs Sewer Extension

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 28,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 5,600 linear feet of 6-inch force main, one pump station and a 0.08 MGD treatment facility.

Existing WWTP: Name: NA Design Flow: NA MGD Average Flow: NA MGD Receiving Stream: NA Stream Classification: NA Impaired Stream (Y/N): NA

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: New River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 185 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The proposed project will require the construction of a new treatment facility.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $11,642,605

Present Worth Per Connection: $62,933

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ubtity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD Average Flow: MeD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name:

Impaired (YIN | |

Industrial =

Residential =

185 Commercial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Cripple Creek Sewer Extension

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 21,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer and a 0.03 MGD treatment facility.

Existing WWTP: Name: NA Design Flow: NA MGD Average Flow: NA MGD Receiving Stream: NA Stream Classification: NA Impaired Stream (Y/N): NA

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Cripple Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 92 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The proposed project will require the construction of a new treatment facility.

Growth Potential: Residential - High Commercial - Moderate/High Industrial - Moderate/High

Total Project Cost: $6,994,000

Present Worth Per Connection: $76,022

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ubtity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD Average Flow: MeD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name:

Impaired (YIN | |

Industrial =

Residential =

$2 Commercial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Poplar Camp/Foster Falls Sewer Extension

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): No

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 35,600 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 8,500 linear feet of 6-inch force main, one pump station and a 0.06 MGD treatment facility.

Existing WWTP: Name: NA Design Flow: NA MGD Average Flow: NA MGD Receiving Stream: NA Stream Classification: NA Impaired Stream (Y/N): NA

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: New River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 176 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Moderate - The proposed project will require the construction of a new treatment facility.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $13,818,220

Present Worth Per Connection: $78,513

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ubtity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD Average Flow: MeD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name:

Impaired (YIN | |

Industrial =

Residential =

176 Commercial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Route 21 South Sewer Extension

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Approximately 1/2 of project area

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 19,000 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, 8,800 linear feet of 6-inch force main and one pump station

Existing WWTP: Name: Wytheville WWTP Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 1.72 MGD Receiving Stream: Reed Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Venrick Run Impaired (Y/N): No Reed Creek No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 94 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The proposed project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,741,890

Present Worth Per Connection: $82,361

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ubtity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD Average Flow: MeD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name:

Impaired (YIN | |

Industrial =

Residential =

84 Commercial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wytheville East Sewer Extension

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Board of Supervisors

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions: The project area is currently not served by a public sewage system.

Proposed Project: The project consists of approximately 8,800 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer.

Existing WWTP: Name: Wytheville WWTP Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 1.72 MGD Receiving Stream: Reed Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Reed Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 21 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility: Very Feasible - The proposed project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,506,985

Present Worth Per Connection: $119,380

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ubtity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD Average Flow: MeD Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Name:

Impaired (YIN | |

Industrial =

Residential =

21 Commercial =

APPENDIX B

DECENTRALIZED PROJECTS

APPENDIX B

DECENTRALIZED PROJECTS

T az ew el l

R u ss el l

D ic ke n so n

B u ch an anH ur

le y

G re

en br

ie r

M cC

lu re

St ra

tt on

Ro se

da le

Cl in

ch fie

Ca rb

O ld

Ca st

le w

oo d

Ba pt

is t

Va lle

y W

es t

H ill

cr es

Eb en

ez er

Su bd

iv is

io n

St . Cl

ai r

H ei

gh ts

Su bd

iv is

io n

R ic

hl an

ds Ce

da r

Bl uf

H on

ak er

G ru

nd y

Ta ze

w el

Po ca

ho nt

Bl ue

fie ld

Cl in

ch co

H ay

Cl in

tw oo

Cl ev

el an

Le ba

no n

C o

u n

To w

n /C

it y

G ra

vi ty

M ai

n Fo

rc e

M ai

Le ge

n d W

W TP

Se w

er P

ro je

ct s

P ro

p o

se d

D ec

en tr

al iz

ed S

ew er

P ro

je ct

s

C P

P D

C P

la n

n in

g D

is tr

ic t

Proposed Decentralized Sewer Projects - CPPDC Planning District

Richlands

Resets @ crsond e

Legend

5 County [1 Town/city — Gravity Main == Force Main

@ wwrip

@ Sewer Projects

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Greenbrier

County: Buchanan

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Buchanan County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older septic systems, small lots, steep slopes, poor soils.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to three treatment plants, total treatment capacity 30,000 GPD. Inground disposal of treated effluent, or VPDES Permit,

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Greenbrier Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 107 Commercial = 3 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $3,667,700

Present Worth Per Connection $42,120

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 107 Commercial= 3 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Hurley

County: Buchanan

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Buchanan County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older septic systems, steep slopes, some alternative and discharging systems, poor soils.

Proposed Project Combined treatment system for two schools, 20,000 GPD with collection system serving surrounding areas. Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) for remainder of project area with 40,000 GPD treatment plant in Hurley.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Knox Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 180 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Moderate, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $4,222,700

Present Worth Per Connection $31,010

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential= 180 Commercial= 10 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: McClure-Stratton

County: Dickenson

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Dickenson County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Failing septic systems, some straight pipe discharges to McClure River.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to three treatment plants, total capacity 30,000 GPD, inground disposal of treated effluent, or VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: McClure River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 104 Commercial = 6 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $3,997,200

Present Worth Per Connection $41,740

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 104 Commercial= 6 Industial=

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Nora

County: Dickenson

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Dickenson County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older septic systems, some straight pipe discharges to the McClure River.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEP) to 5,000 GPD treatment plant with inground disposal system.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: McClure River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 14 Commercial = 1 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Low, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $623,400

Present Worth Per Connection $46,970

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 14_—Commercial= 1 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Carbo

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County PSA

Served by Public Water? No

Existing Conditions Older septic systems, small lots, very impervious clay soils.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) 50 5,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Clinch River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 19 Commercial = 1 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Moderate, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $511,900

Present Worth Per Connection $34,380

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 19 Commercial= 1 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Clinchfield

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County PSA

Served by Public Water? No

Existing Conditions Former coal camp with older septic systems, small lots, high water table.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 7,500 GPD treatment plant. Inground disposal of treated effluent, or VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Millstone Branch Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 29 Commercial = 1 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $1,033,000

Present Worth Per Connection $39,840

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 29» Commercial= | 1 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Old Castlewood

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Small lots, approximately one-half of systems failing, unapproved, or on community straight pipe to river.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 7,500 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Clinch River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 24 Commercial = 1 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $773,100

Present Worth Per Connection $39,700

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 24 Commercial= | 1 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rosedale

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Russell County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older septic systems, small lots, clay soils.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 40,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Elk Garden Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 145 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Moderate, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Moderate

Total Project Cost $4,020,900

Present Worth Per Connection $34,720

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 145. Commercial= | 10 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Baptist Valley West

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Problem sections in project area due to shallow soils to rock, high water table, and heavy clay soils.

Proposed Project Project area includes 12 clusters of homes, 6 to 22 homes in each, served by effluent collection systems (STEG and STEP), each with a treatment plant and inground disposal of treated effluent.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Tributary to Indian Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 181 Commercial = 4 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Moderate

Total Project Cost $6,162,900

Present Worth Per Connection $38,720

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 181. Commercial= 4 Industial= =O

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Hillcrest

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Homes are served by older septic systems that are failing, and there is a community straight pipe to Laurel Fork.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 7,500 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Laurel Fork Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 29 Commercial = 1 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Moderate, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $795,200

Present Worth Per Connection $35,290

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 29» Commercial= | 1 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: St. Clair Heights Subdivision

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Bluefield Sanitary Board

Served by Public Water? No

Existing Conditions Small lots, with septic systems nearing the end of their useful life, repair options are limited.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 12,000 GPD treatment plant, with inground disposal of effluent, serving 45 homes. Alternative to treatment plant is connect effluent collection system to Bluefield Sanitary Board sewer interceptor on US Route 460.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Bluestone River Stream Classification: VI Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 45 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $1,518,400

Present Worth Per Connection $39,150

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 45 Commercial= (0 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Ebenezer Subdivision

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Bluefield Sanitary Board

Served by Public Water? No

Existing Conditions Small lots, with septic systems nearing the end of their useful life, repair options are limited.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 10,000 GPD treatment plant, with inground disposal of effluent. Alternative to treatment plant is connect effluent collection system to Bluefield Sanitary Board sewer interceptor on US Route 460.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Bluestone River Stream Classification: VI Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 40 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $1,311,200

Present Worth Per Connection $38,185

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 40 Commercial= (0 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

N o rt o n

Le e

S co ttW is e

Ke ok

St on

e Cr

ee k

N at

ur al

Tu nn

el Pa

rk w

M or

ris D

riv e

D un

ba r

Li tt

le Le

ag ue

D riv

H on

ey B

ra nc

h R us

se ll

Cr ee

Pe nn

in gt

on G

Po un

Co eb

ur n

Ap pa

la ch

D un

ga nn

on N ic

ke ls

vi lle

G at

e Ci

W eb

er C

ity

Cl in

ch po

D uf

fie ld

W is

St .

Pa ul

Bi g

St on

e G

Jo ne

sv ill

St . Ch

ar le

C o

u n

To w

n /C

it y

G ra

vi ty

M ai

n Fo

rc e

M ai

Le ge

n d W

W TP

Se w

er P

ro je

ct s

P ro

p o

se d

D ec

en tr

al iz

ed S

ew er

P ro

je ct

s

LE N

O W

IS C

O P

la n

n in

g D

is tr

ic t

Proposed Decentralized Sewer Projects - LENOWISCO Planning District

Legend

i County

[5 Town/city

— Gravity Main Force Main

@ wwrtP

@ = Sewer Projects

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Keokee

County: Lee

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Lee County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Coal camp community with most homes and septic systems more than 50 years old. Small lots and shallow soils make repairs difficult.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 25,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Crab Orchard Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 90 Commercial = 5 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Low, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $3,559,100

Present Worth Per Connection $46,250

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 90 Commercial= |S Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Stone Creek

County: Lee

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Lee County PSA

Served by Public Water? No

Existing Conditions Upper sections of Stone Creek are served by older septic systems and potentially straight pipes, as evidenced by elevated levels of E. coli.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) along US Highway 421 for approximately four miles, connecting to PSA sewer interceptor at St. Charles Road.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stone Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 58 Commercial = 2 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $1,774,500

Present Worth Per Connection $37,680

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= SB. Commercial= | 2 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Natural Tunnell Parkway

County: Scott

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Scott County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Many homes in low-lying areas along Stock Creek, with septic systems over 30 years old. Soils are shallow to shale. Several alternative and discharging treatment systems in project area.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 5,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stock Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 16 Commercial = 1 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $596,000

Present Worth Per Connection $43,840

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 16. Commercial= | 1 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Spring Valley Subdivision

County: Scott

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Bloomingdale Utility District

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions An older subdivision with septic systems nearing the end of their effective life. Lots are small, and soils are very heavy clays. The primary problem section of the subdivision is the Morris Drive area.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEP) to 5,000 GPD treatment plant. Inground disposal of treated effluent, or VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Clark Branch Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 20 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $682,200

Present Worth Per Connection $39,510

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 20 Commercial= 0 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Dunbar

County: Wise

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Wise County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Former coal camp community with older homes in low lying areas. Many greywater and straight pipe discharges. Community almost entirely in fill material.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG) to 9,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Potcamp Fork Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 35 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Moderate, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $928,900

Present Worth Per Connection $35,320

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 35 Commercial= (0 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Honey Branch

County: Wise

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Town of St. Paul

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Existing homes and septic systems more than 30 years old, limited area for repairs between steep slopes and stream. Stream is listed as impaired due to elevated levels of E. coli.

Proposed Project Due to distance between homes, the proposed project is to identify homes in need of system repair or replacement, and make needed improvements. Estimate is approximately 50% or 35 of the 65 homes in project area need improvements.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Honey Branch Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 65 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Moderate, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Moderate

Total Project Cost $836,000

Present Worth Per Connection $29,290

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalont Customers Served: Residential= 65.—««Commorcial= —«@O—Industrial=

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Little League Road

County: Wise

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Town of Coeburn

Served by Public Water? No

Existing Conditions Homes are isolated from public water and sewer by creek and railroad. Soils are shallow to seasonal water table, resulting in several VPDES discharges. Toms Creek is impaired due to elevated levels of E. coli.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG) to 4,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Toms Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 15 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $503,000

Present Worth Per Connection $42,310

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 15. Commercial= 0 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Russell Creek

County: Wise

Planning District: LENOWISCO

Utility Provider: Wise County PSA

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Area includes former coal camp community (Virginia City), with older homes and septic systems, shallow soils, homes close to stream, several VPDES discharges.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Russell Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 35 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Moderate, due to cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $477,800

Present Worth Per Connection $29,290

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 35 Commercial= (0 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

G al ax

W as h in g to n

B ri st o l

S m yt h

B la n d

C ar ro ll

W yt h e

G ra ys o n

St . Cl

ai rs

Cr ee

Cl in

ch bu

rg Sp

ee dw

el l

Cr oc

ke tt

Iv an

ho e

Tr ou

td al

H ill

sv ill

W yt

he vi

lle

R ur

al R

et re

at Sa

ltv ill

e Ch ilh

ow ie

Ab in

gd on

D am

as cu

G la

de S

pr in

M ar

io n

Fr ie

In de

pe nd

en ce

C o

u n

To w

n /C

it y

G ra

vi ty

M ai

n Fo

rc e

M ai

Le ge

n d W

W TP

Se w

er P

ro je

ct s

P ro

p o

se d

D ec

en tr

al iz

ed S

ew er

P ro

je ct

s

M R

P D

C P

la n

n in

g D

is tr

ic t

Proposed Decentralized Sewer Projects - MRPDC Planning District

Legend

HN County GS Town/city — Gravity Main Force Main

@ wwrp

@ Sewer Projects

Ecinchourg}

Washington’

Bristol Grayson,

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: St. Clairs Creek

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mt. Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County Water and Sewer

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Many homes built prior to 1980, septic systems at or nearing their useful life, repairs beginning to be needed, shallow to water table near creek, shallow to rock in the higher elevations.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to two treatment plants: 40,000 GPD plant near Macedonia Baptist Church and 25,000 GPD plant near Country Lane, both with VPDES Permits.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: St. Clairs Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 245 Commercial = 5 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Moderate

Total Project Cost $7,067,600

Present Worth Per Connection $37,050

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 245 Commercial= |S Industial= =O

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Clinchburg

County: Washington

Planning District: Mt. Rogers

Utility Provider: Washington County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older homes, built 1920 to 1950, small lots (average 0.2 acre), failing septic systems, repairs are very difficult.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 15,000 GPD treatment plant, with inground disposal of effluent.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stonemill Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 55 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost of connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $1,844,800

Present Worth Per Connection $38,950

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= $5 Commercial= 0 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Crockett

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mt. Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older homes, most built between 1920 and 1970, small lots (less than 0.5 acre), shallow rock and seasonal water table make repairs difficult.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 12,500 GPD treatment plant, with inground disposal of effluent if disposal site is suitable. If not, a VPDES discharge.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Tate Run Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 49 Commercial = 1 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $1,871,400

Present Worth Per Connection $42,830

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 49 Commercial= 1 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Ivanhoe

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mt. Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older homes built between 1920 and 1980, septic systems at and beyond useful life and beginning to fail, small lots.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 60,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: New River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 210 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Moderate

Total Project Cost $6,812,800

Present Worth Per Connection $41,100

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 210 Commercial= 10 Industial= 0

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Speedwell

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mt. Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County Service Authority

Served by Public Water? Yes

Existing Conditions Older homes, built between 1920 and 1970, septic systems beginning to fail, small lots make repairs difficult.

Proposed Project Effluent collection system (STEG and STEP) to 30,000 GPD treatment plant, with VPDES Permit.

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Cripple Creek Stream Classification: VI Impaired Stream No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 114 Commercial = 6 Industrial = 0

Health Hazard No

Construction Feasibility Marginal, based on cost per connection.

Growth Potential Low

Total Project Cost $3,364,700

Present Worth Per Connection $36,820

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Utility Provider:

‘Served by Public Water?

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Watershed or Adjacent Stream Name: Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream

Equivalent Customers Served: Residental= 114 Commercial= 6 Industial= =O

Health Hazard

Construction Feasibility

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection

APPENDIX C

POTENTIAL EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM UPGRADE PROJECTS

This Appendix includes descriptions of potential upgrade/rehabilitation projects identified for existing wastewater collection systems and/or treatment plants.

APPENDIX C

POTENTIAL EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM UPGRADE PROJECTS

This Appendix includes descriptions of potential upgrade/rehabilitation projects identified for existing wastewater collection systems and/or treatment plants.

APPENDIX C

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS UPGRADES

APPENDIX C

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS UPGRADES

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Buchanan County PSA - SSES

County: Buchanan

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Buchanan County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.667 MGD

Receiving Stream: Levisa River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Levisa River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1205 Commercial = 38 Industrial = 155

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 5,065,000$

Cost Per Connection: $3,623

Conaway Water Reclamation Facility

Currently several areas of the BCPSA collection system experiences high I/I and have lead to elevated inflows

to the existing BCPSA wastewater treatment plant.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems current issues with I/I.

The project consists of Sewer line replacement, Manhole replacement, CCTV inspections, Sewer lateral

replacement.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name:

Design Flow: McD Average Flow: Map Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream (YIN)

‘Name: Impaired (YN): | |

1205 Commercial= 38 Industrial= 185

Resident

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Buchanan County PSA - Wastewater Treatment Plant

County: Buchanan

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Buchanan County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.667 MGD

Receiving Stream: Levisa River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Levisa River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1205 Commercial = 38 Industrial = 155

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 29,437,946$

Cost Per Connection: $21,057

Conaway Water Reclamation Facility

Currently the existing BCPSA Conaway wastewater treatment plant is undersized to handle the systems I/I and

results in occasional washouts during heavy rain events.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater treatment plant will address the systems current issues

handling I/I.

The project consists of construction of a MBBR and ballasted sedimentation WWTP, construction of a WWTP

operation building, construction of influent pump station and screening facilities, construction of aerobic digester, installation of UV system, installation of dewatering system,installation of pump station and WWTP

generators.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name:

Design Flow: McD Average Flow: Map Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream (YIN)

‘Name: Impaired (YN): | |

1205 Commercial= 38 Industrial= 185

Resident

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Sewer Improvements Project

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Cedar Bluff

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: INP MGD

Average Flow: 0.16 MGD

Receiving Stream:

Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream (Y/N):

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River, Coal Creek, Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 265 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - INP

Commercial - INP

Industrial - INP

Total Project Cost: 1,987,500$

Present Worth Per Connection: $7,500

Information not provided (INP).

Information not provided.

Information not provided (INP)

& Middle Creek

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Waste Water Treatment Expansion Project

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Cleveland

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: MGD

Average Flow: 0.04 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 67 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - INP

Commercial - INP

Industrial - INP

Total Project Cost: 1,000,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $14,925

Cleveland Waste Water Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP).

Information not provided.

Expand existing WWTP treatment capacity from 40,000 GPD to 80,000 GPD.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Haysi Sewer Replacement

County: Dickenson

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Dickenson County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 0.20 MGD

Average Flow: 0.196 MGD

Receiving Stream: Russell Fork River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Russell Fork River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 188 Commercial = 145 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 1,910,094$

Cost Per Connection: $5,736

Haysi Wastewater Treatment Plant

The existing gravity sewer system consists of ductile iron pipe that has deteriorated and is causing backups in

the system which has resulted in overflows into the Russell Fork River.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems current issues with I/I.

The project consists of the replacement of approximately 3,100 linear feet of 10-inch gravity sewer and 13

manholes.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name:

Design Flow: McD Average Flow: MD Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification:

Impaired Stream (YIN)

‘Name: Impaired (YN): | |

188 Commercial= 145 Industrial=

Resident

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: SSES Rehabilitation

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Honaker

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: INP MGD Average Flow: INP MGD Receiving Stream: Lewis Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Lewis Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 630 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - INP Commercial - INP Industrial - INP

Total Project Cost: 4,725,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $7,500

Honaker Waste Water Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP). SSES being completed.

Information not provided.

Information not provided (INP). Cost estimated based upon using $7,500/connection for entire system.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

imstesevn: ver

Residential = © 6380 Commercial=—Industriah=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Waste Water Treatment Plant Improvements Project

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Honaker

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: INP MGD

Average Flow: INP MGD

Receiving Stream: Lewis Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Lewis Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 630 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - INP

Commercial - INP

Industrial - INP

Total Project Cost: 2,612,704$

Present Worth Per Connection: $4,147

Honaker Waste Water Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP).

Information not provided.

Information not provided (INP)

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: System-Wide Sewer Improvements Project

County: Russell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Lebanon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 1.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.619 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little Cedar Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Big Cedar Creek, Burgess Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1569 Commercial = 80 Industrial = 6

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 2,921,700$

Present Worth Per Connection: $1,765

Lebanon Sewer Filtering Plant

Approximately half of the existing gravity sewer system was constructed more than 30 years ago and has

deteriorated significantly, resulting in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during

wet weather events and increased flows in the the WWTP.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer conveyance will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing capacity

for the area, reduce SSO’s, and decreasing flows into the WWTP.

The project consists of CIPP lining approximately 16,300 linear feet of gravity sewer line and approximately 110

manholes throughout the conveyance system.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Tazewell County PSA - Falls Mills SSES

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Tazewell County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 0.108 MGD

Average Flow: 0.104 MGD

Receiving Stream: Bluestone River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Bluestone River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 171 Commercial = 9 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 19,708,054$

Cost Per Connection: $109,489

Falls Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant

The existing collection system and wastewater treatment plant is nearing it’s useful life and is in need of

replacement.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems aging infrastructure.

The project consists of replacement of force main, rehabilitation of manholes, repair of manholes, rehabilitation of pump stations, waterproofing manhole frame and replacing covers,replacement of gravity lines, point repair

of gravity lines, service connection reinstatement.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: MGD Average Flow: MD Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

Name: tse er gad com: Yas AT Commercal= 8 ntstal=

Resident

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Richlands - 4.0 MGD WWTP Upgrades and Improvements

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Richlands

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 2154 Commercial = 271 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 11,298,906$

Cost Per Connection: $4,659

Richlands Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility

The current system experiences high amounts of I/I and has a wastewater treatment plant that is nearing its

useful life and is in need of equipment replacement and rehabilitation.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems aging infrastructure.

The project consists Influent pump station rehabilitation including influent and sludge pumps & VFDs, valve

replacements, new walkway, monorail & electric hoist, painting, replacement windows & doors, LED lighting

and HVAC Upgrades, Pretreatment building including demolition and replacement of existing pre-engineered

metal building, mechanical screen and compactor, grit classifier/cyclone, grit system diffused air system,

pumps, blowers and VFDs, belt conveyor, valve and gate replacements, New septage receiving station,

Primary clarifiers mechanism rehabilitation, valve replacements and primary sludge pumps and VFDs,

Secondary Clarifiers mechanism rehabilitation, valve replacements, RAS/WAS Pumps, and sluice gate

replacements in influent box, Aeration basins, VFSs and controls for aerators, 2 replacement aerator motors &

gearboxes, mud valve replacements and sluice gate replacements in influent box; UV disinfection system

replacement, Effluent and non-potable water system rehabilitation with replacement post-aeration blowers,

effluent pumps & VFDs, non-potable pumps and diffused air system & valves, Gravity thickeners including

thickener mechanism rehabilitation and telescopic valve replacement, Anaerobic digesters: new digester

mixing system, replacement of digester safety vents, valve replacements, sludge transfer & recirculation rumps

and cleaning of the digesters, including removal and disposal of sludge & grit and power washing tank interiors;

Dewatering/shop building improvements including replacement of belt Press, new sludge cake conveyor,

replacing processed sludge pumps, valve replacements, Instrumentation including DO, ORP and pH Meters (9

each), replacement of plant flow meters and pressure gauges, and new laboratory equipment,

Rehabilitation/upgrade of Raven Doran lift station including new pumps, VFDs, valves, second wetwell, and

bypass piping, Including miscellaneous replacement of sump pumps, yard piping, automatic samplers,

provision of bypass pumping during construction, electrical & controls, SCADA Update (software, interfaces,

PLCs), replacement of 8 ft. chain link fence with barbed wire, 1.5-inch pavement overlay of access road &

parking lot, chain link fence swing gate replacement and associated items.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Projact Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Serve by Public Water (YN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potent

Total Project Cost:

Cost Per Connection:

“Town of Richlands - 4.0 MGD WWTP Upgrades and Improvements Tazewell

Cumberland Pateau

“Town of Rehlands

Yes

‘The current system experiences high amounts of Ul and has @ wastewater treatment plant that is nearing its useful life and isn need of equipment replacement and rehabitation.

“The project consists Inluent pump station rehabilitation including infuent and sludge pumps & VFDs, valve replacements, new walkway, monorail & electric host, painting, replacement windows & doors, LED lighting land HVAC Upgrades, Pretreatment building including demolition and replacement of existing pre-engineered ‘metal building, mechanical screen and compactor, grit classifricycione, git system diftused air system, pumps, blowers and VFDs, belt conveyor, valve and gate replacements, New septage receiving station, Primary larers mechanism rehabilitation, valve replacements and primary sludge pumps and VFDs, ‘Secondary Ciarifers mechanism rehabiltation, valve replacements, RAS/WAS Pumps, and sluice gate replacements in influent box, Aeration basins, VFSS and controls fr aerators, 2 replacement aerator motors & ‘gearboxes, mud valve replacements and sluice gate replacements in influent box; UV disinfection system replacement, Effluent and non-potable water system rehabilitation with replacement post-aeration blowers, ‘effluent pumps & VFDS, non-potabie pumps and diffused ae system & valves, Gravity thickeners inluding thickener mechanism rehabiliaion and telescopic valve replacement, Anaerobic digesters: new digester mixing system, replacement of cigester safety vents, valve replacements, sludge transfer & recirculation rumps and cleaning ofthe digesters, including removal and cisposal of sludge & art and power washing tank interiors DDewateringishop building improvements including replacement of belt Press, new sludge cake conveyor, replacing processed sludge pumps, valve replacements, Instumentation including DO, ORP and pH Meters (9 ‘each), replacement of plant flow meters and pressure gauges, and new laboratory equipment, Rehabiltaion/upgrade of Raven Doran if slaion including new pumps, VFDs, valves, second wetwel, and bypass piping, Including miscellaneous replacement of sump pumps, yard ping, automatic samplers, provision of bypass pumping during construction, electrical & controls, SCADA Update (sofware interfaces, PLCs), replacement of 8 R. chain lnk fence wih barbed wire, 1.5-inch pavement overlay of access road & parking lt, chain ink fence swing gate replacement and associated items.

Name Richlands Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Design Flow: 400 MGD

‘Average Flow: 2182 MGD

Receiving Stream Clinch River

Stream Classification: Vv

Impaired Stream (¥IN} Yes

Name Clinch River Impaired (YIN: Yes:

Residential = 2154 Commercial an °

\Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems aging infrastructure.

Residential - High Commercial - High Industrial - Moderate

8 11,208,908,

$4658

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Richlands SSES

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Richlands

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 2.182 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 2154 Commercial = 271 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 12,795,213$

Cost Per Connection: $5,276

Richlands Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility

The current system experiences high amounts of I/I and has a wastewater treatment plant that is nearing its

useful life and is in need of equipment replacement and rehabilitation.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems aging infrastructure.

The following work was proposed in the Town of Richlands SSES and will be broken down into 9 phases

Rehabilitation of approximately 1,824 vertical feet of manholes, Repair of 304 manhole inverts and benchs,

Waterproofing of 304 manhole frames and cover replacement, Rehabilitation of 39,594 Linear Feet (L.F.) of 8-

inch sewer main, Replacement of 13,198 L.F. of 8-inch sewer main, Rehabilitation of 1,506 L.F. of 10-inch

sewer main, Replacement of 502 L.F. of 10-inch sewer main, Rehabilitation of 835 L.F. of 12-inch sewer main,

Replacement of 278 L.F. of 12-inch sewer main, Service connection reinstatement of approximately 517

connections.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

‘v EE

2154 Commercial= 27 Industrial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Tazewell SSES

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Tazewell

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.893 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1655 Commercial = 207 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 22,891,448$

Cost Per Connection: $12,294

Tazewell Wastewater Treatment Plant

The current system experiences high amounts of I/I and has a wastewater treatment plant that is nearing its

useful life and is in need of equipment replacement and rehabilitation.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems aging infrastructure.

The proposed improvements include Rehabilitation of approximately 5,298 vertical feet of manholes, Repair of

883 manhole inverts and benches, Waterproofing of 883 manhole frames and cover replacement,

Rehabilitation of 73,047 Linear Feet (L.F.) of 8-inch sewer main, Replacement of 23,439 L.F. of 8-inch sewer

main, Rehabilitation of 1,971 L.F. of 6-inch sewer main, Replacement of 658 L.F. of 6-inch sewer main, Service

connection reinstatement of approximately 1,050 connections.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stroam:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: M@D ‘Average Flow: MGD Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

Name: eter pad cm: Yas

Resident

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Tazewell Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements

County: Tazewell

Planning District: Cumberland Plateau

Utility Provider: Town of Tazewell

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 2.00 MGD

Average Flow: 0.893 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1655 Commercial = 207 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 11,838,994$

Cost Per Connection: $6,358

Tazewell Wastewater Treatment Plant

The current system experiences high amounts of I/I and has a wastewater treatment plant that is nearing its

useful life and is in need of equipment replacement and rehabilitation.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems aging infrastructure.

The proposed improvements project generally consists of the following construction of a new wetwell/drywell

influent pump station with a mechanical screen system; a new induced vortex grit removal system at the

existing grit building; and a building addition to the existing pre-engineered metal building housing the sludge

dewatering system, replacement of primary sludge, secondary recycle sludge, waste sludge, digested sludge,

non-potable and various other pumps; of clarifier mechanisms at two primary clarifiers and two secondary

clarifiers; of air diffuser, mixing systems and associated blowers for a dual train MLE; activated sludge

secondary treatment system; of the existing channel UV system; and of air diffuser systems and associated

blowers for two aerobic digesters, replacement of the existing stand-by generator and automatic transfer

switch; and miscellaneous process piping, valves, gates, and meters; existing controls and SCADA throughout

the plant, rehabilitation of an existing dual traveling bridge tertiary filtration system, installation of an MLE

MLSS recycle pump system; of a new belt press, of a new belt conveyor for dewatered cake; and of new

process instrumentation including DO, pH and ORP meters, demolition of existing glass greenhouse building and construction of new open-walled structure at dewatered cake storage area,ventilation and heat

replacement/improvements at three buildings; roof replacement at two buildings; electrical upgrades; and

miscellaneous demolition throughout the plant to allow for installation of new equipment.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stroam:

Equivalent Customers Served

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection

‘Tazewell Regional Wastewater Treatment Pian Improvements Tazewell

‘Cumberland Prateau

‘Town of Tazewell

Yes

‘The current system experiences high amounts of Ii and has a wastewater treatment plant that is nearing its sel ife and is in need of equipment replacement and rehabiitation,

‘The proposed improvements project generally Consists of the following construction of a new welwelldrywell influent pump station with @ mechanical seceen system; a new induced vortex git removal system at the ‘existing git building; and a bulging addition tothe existing pre-engineered metal bulding housing the sludge dewatering system, replacement of primary sludge, secondary recycle sludge, waste sludge, digested sludge, ‘non-potable and various other pumps; of clarifier mechanisms at two primary clarifiers and two secondary lanier; of alr difluser, mixing systems and associated blowers fora dual ain MLE: activated sludge ‘secondary treatment system; of the existing channel UV system: and of air ifuser systems and associated blowers for two aerobic digesters, replacement of the existing stand-by generator and aulomatic transfer ‘switch; and miscellaneous process piping, valves, gates, and meters; existing controls and SCADA throughout the plant, rehabilitation ofan existing dual traveling bridge tertiary fitration system, instalation of an MLE [MLSS recycle pump system; of a new belt press, of a new belt conveyor for dewatered cake; and of new process instrumentation including DO, pH and ORP meters, demaliion of existing glass greenhouse building {and construction of new open-salled structure at dewatered cake storage area,ventilation and heat replacementimprovements at three buildings: rf replacement at two buildings; electrical upgrades; and miscellaneous demoltion throughout the plant to alow for installation of new equipment.

Name Tazewell Wastewater Treatment Plant Design Flow: 200 MGD ‘Average Flow: 0893 MGO Receiving Stream Clinch River ‘Stream Classification: v Impaired Stream (YIN) Yes Name: Clinch River Impaired (YIN) Yes 16585 Commercial 207 Industrial = o

Very Feasibie- The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systoms aging infrastructure.

Residential - High ‘Commercial - High Industrial - Moderate

8 11,898,904

$6,358

APPENDIX C

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS UPGRADES

APPENDIX C

LENOWISCO PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS UPGRADES

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rose Hill Sewer SSES Improvement Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Rose Hill

Design Flow: 0.06 MGD

Average Flow: 0.06 MGD

Receiving Stream: Martin’s Creek

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Martin’s Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $172,700

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximatley 21.8% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repair to existing manholes and sewerlines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Dryden Sewer SSES Improvement Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pennington Gap

Design Flow: 0.60 MGD

Average Flow: 0.287 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $570,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximatley 48.2% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repair to existing manholes and sewerlines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rose Hill Sewer WWTP Improvement Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Lee County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Rose Hill

Design Flow: 0.06 MGD

Average Flow: 0.06 MGD

Receiving Stream: Martin’s Creek

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Martin’s Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $1,500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 28 years old and the metal surfaces and piping are starting to deteriorate

in condition. Also replacement parts are not available for much of the equipment.

The project will provide equipment replacement, replace piping system and repair any metal surfaces.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Pennington Gap Sewer WWTP Improvement Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Pennington Gap

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pennington Gap

Design Flow: 0.60 MGD

Average Flow: 0.287 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,994,500

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system has not had any major repairs in 30 years.

The project will provide the rehabilitation of the Pump Station, Generators, equipment, aeration system and

miscellaneous piping.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Pennington Gap Sewer SSES Improvement Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Pennington Gap

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pennington Gap

Design Flow: 0.60 MGD

Average Flow: 0.287 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $1,500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system experiences high levels of I/I.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repair to existing manholes and sewerlines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Jement Project

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Jonesville I&I Improvement Project

County: Lee

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Jonesville

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Hickory Flats

Design Flow: 0.80 MGD

Average Flow: 0.28 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Town Branch Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system experiences high levels of I/I.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewerlines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Duffield I&I Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County PSA

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Duffield

Design Flow: 0.40 MGD

Average Flow: 0.2 MGD

Receiving Stream: Cinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 49.1% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Weber City I&I Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County PSA

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 62.3% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Gate City I&I Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Gate City

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Moccasin Creek Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 35.3% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Nickelsville I&I Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County PSA

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Nickelsville

Design Flow: 0.07 MGD

Average Flow: 0.036 MGD

Receiving Stream: Cooper Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Copper Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $1,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 60.1% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Dungannon I&I Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Dungannon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Dungannon

Design Flow: 0.0399 MGD

Average Flow: 0.0199 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 82.6% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Duffield WWTP Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County PSA

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Duffield

Design Flow: 0.40 MGD

Average Flow: 0.2 MGD

Receiving Stream: Cinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $1,200,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The system has experienced two major upgrades projects over the last 5 years.

The project will included minor pump station improvements and rehabilitation of the sludge drying beds.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Holston WWTP Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County PSA

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Holston

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.143 MGD

Receiving Stream: Holston River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The WWTP received upgrades in the late 2000’s. Minor improvements are needed.

The project will included the installation of a equalization basin, on site pump and valve replacement, expansion

of drying beds and roof replacement.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Nickelsville WWTP Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Scott County PSA

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Nickelsville

Design Flow: 0.07 MGD

Average Flow: 0.036 MGD

Receiving Stream: Cooper Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Copper Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The Nickelsville WWTP is currently in the process of upgrades.

The project will included upgrades to the pump station throughout the collection system.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Dungannon WWTP Improvement Project

County: Scott

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Dungannon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Dungannon

Design Flow: 0.0399 MGD

Average Flow: 0.0199 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing treatment plant is in good condition.

The project will included minor improvements to the WWTP facility.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Appalachia Elementary School WWTP to Forcemain Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Big Stone Gap

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.575 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $1,600,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing Appalachia Elementary School Wastewater Treatment Plant is over 40 years old and is

experiencing severe deterioration of the existing treatment systems.

The project will remove the current discharge at Appalachia Elementary and pump the sewer to the Town of

Appalachia.

Very Feasible - The project will connect to an existing system with adequate treatment capacity.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

rcemain Project

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Coeburn I&I Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Coeburn

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $7,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 16.3% accountable.

The project will consist of major manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be major repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: St. Paul SSES Improvements Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of St. Paul

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: St. Paul

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 0.081 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,500,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 59.2% accountable.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Pound I&I Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pound

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 1.053 MGD

Receiving Stream: Pound River

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: North Fork Pound Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $15,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 10.1% accountable.

The project will consist of major manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be major repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: City of Norton SSES Improvements Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: City of Norton

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $8,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximately 13.1% accountable.

The project will consist of major manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be major repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Appalachia I&I Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Appalachia

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Big Stone Gap

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.575 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $4,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system experiences high levels of I/I.

The project will consist of major manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be major repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Big Stone Gap SSES Improvement Project Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Big Stone Gap

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Big Stone Gap

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.575 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $25,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system is approximatley 29.2% accountable.

The project will consist of major manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be major repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewerlines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Project Project

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: CNW I&I Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: CNW Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system experiences high levels of I/I.

The project will consist of minor manhole and sewer line improvements to reduce potential I/I sources.

Very Feasible - The project will be minor repairs/replacement to existing manholes and sewer lines.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Pound WWTP Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Wise County Public Service Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Pound

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 1.053 MGD

Receiving Stream: Pound River

Stream Classification: V

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: North Fork Pound Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $8,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The existing system has deteriorated and needs major upgrades to operate.

The project will replace/rehab the entire WWTP.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: St Paul WWTP Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of St. Paul

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: St. Paul

Design Flow: 0.50 MGD

Average Flow: 0.081 MGD

Receiving Stream: Clinch River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Clinch River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $2,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The plant completed an upgrade in the last 5 years.

The plant will need minor improvements.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Big Stone Gap WWTP Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: Town of Big Stone Gap

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Big Stone Gap

Design Flow: 4.00 MGD

Average Flow: 1.575 MGD

Receiving Stream: Powell River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Powell River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $6,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The plant completed an upgrade in the mid 2000’s but many items are original to the plant upgrade completed

over 30 years ago.

The project will include the following upgrade/replacements, headworks, equalization basin modifications,

oxidation ditch channel etc.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: CNW WWTP Improvement Project

County: Wise

Planning District: Lenowisco

Utility Provider: CNW Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: CNW

Design Flow: 6.50 MGD

Average Flow: 3.7 MGD

Receiving Stream: Guest River

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Guest River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low

Commercial - Low

Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: $3,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: #DIV/0!

The plant completed an upgrade in the mid 2000’s but many items are orginial to the plant completed over 30

years ago.

The plant will need minor improvements.

Very Feasible - The project will be rehabilitation of the existing facilities.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow. McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

APPENDIX C

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEMS UPGRADES

APPENDIX C

MOUNT ROGERS PLANNING DISTRICT

EXISTING SYSTEMS UPGRADES

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Phase 1 Sewer Improvements Project

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 370 Commercial = 60 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 3,314,000$ 9502000

Present Worth Per Connection: $7,707

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

The gravity sewer system was constructed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly, resulting

in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during wet weather events and increased

flows in the the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer conveyance will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing

capacity for the area, and reduce SSO’s.

The project consists of relining approximately 2,300 linear feet and the replacement of approximately 3,850

linear feet of 18-inch and smaller gravity sewer and rehabilitating approximately 25 manholes in the Whites Mill

and Walden Road area.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Walden Road Sewer Improvements Project

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 370 Commercial = 60 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 2,663,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $6,193

The gravity sewer system was constructed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly, resulting

in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during wet weather events and increased

flows in the the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility.

The project consists of replacing approximately 4,500 linear feet and approximately 15 manholes.

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Very Feasible - The improvements on the interceptor will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing capacity for the

area, and reduce SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Phase 2 Sewer Improvements Project

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 206 Commercial = 309 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 9,502,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $18,450

The gravity sewer system was constructed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly, resulting

in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during wet weather events and increased

flows in the the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility.

The project consists of relining approximately 2,300 linear feetand the replacement of approximately 3,850

linear feet of 18-inch and smaller gravity sewer and rehabilitating approximately 25 manholes.

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer conveyance will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing capacity

for the area, and reduce SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Phase 3 Sewer Improvements Project

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 533 Commercial = 80 Industrial = 7

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 5,000,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $8,065

The gravity sewer system was constructed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly, resulting

in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during wet weather events and increased

flows in the the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility.

This project is currently in the SSES phase, and a full project description has not been developed at this time.

Given the previous SSES work, and given flow data from the Porterfiled Hwy and the Cummings Heights area,

it is anticipated that portions of the system will require improvements.

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer conveyance will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing

capacity for the area, and reduce SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Phase 4 Sewer Improvements Project

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 886 Commercial = 130 Industrial = 14

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 5,000,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $4,854

The gravity sewer system was constructed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly, resulting

in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during wet weather events and increased

flows in the the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility.

The Town has a place holder to perform an SSES in the Lee Hwy and Hillman Hwy areas on the east side of

Town later in 2024. Therefore, a full project description has not been developed at this time. Given the

previous SSES work, and the condition of the those areas already assessed it is anticipated that a portion of

this area of the system will require improvements.

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer conveyance will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing

capacity for the area, and reduce SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Phase 5 Sewer Improvements Project

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1772 Commercial = 250 Industrial = 38

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 10,000,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $4,854

The gravity sewer system was constructed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly, resulting

in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during wet weather events and increased

flows in the the Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility.

The Town has a place holder to perform an SSES in the Vances Mill and Stonemill areas on the south and west

side of Town later in 2025. Therefore, a full project description has not been developed at this time. Given the

previous SSES work, and the condition of the those areas already assessed it is anticipated that a portion of

this area of the system will require improvements.

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer conveyance system will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing

capacity for the area, and reduce SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility Improvements

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 4430 Commercial = 690 Industrial = 31

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 5,000,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $971

The proposed project would include the replacement of VFD’s, UV Disinfection Unit, Electrical work throughout

the facility, replacement of aeration dissolved oxygen controllers, installation of a trash pump, replacement of

the digester feed pump gearbox, replacement of pumps and motors, and the replacement of primary sludge

tank.

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Very Feasible - The improvements to the Water Reclamation Facility will improve operability, reduce O&M

costs, and improve the water quality of the effluent discharge into Wolf Creek.

The Water Reclamation Facility was originally built in 1978, and thought there have been several improvements

made to the facility (the last one being in 2011), several treatment components are no longer working or

functioning properly. Those that are working have exceeded their life expectancy and are in desparate need of

replacement.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potential

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

foment

Name: Design Flow: McD ‘Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

‘

Name:

Impaired (YIN): | |

Resident © 430 commerci= 680, Industal= at

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name:

County: Washington

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Abingdon

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 4.95 MGD

Average Flow: 2.54 MGD

Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Wolf Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 4430 Commercial = 690 Industrial = 31

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 3,000,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $582

The gravity sewer system was constructed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly. The

Town has six (6) sewer lift stations throughout the conveyance system that were installed between 1984 and

The older lift stations and wetwells have exceeded their life exectancy and need to be replaced.

The proposed project includes the removal of one lift station and the installation of 1,000 linear feet of 12-inch

gravity sewer line, the replacement and relocation of a lift station and wet well, and upgrades to the pumps,

controls, and wet wells at the remaining three (3) locations.

Wolf Creek Water Reclamation Facility

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer lift stations throughout the convyance system will improve

system operability, increase capacity, reducing O&M costs, and aid in reducing SSO’s. Further, the removal of

one of the lift stations will reduce electrical costs and improve system operations in that area.

System-Wide Sewer Lift Station Improvements Project

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VN):

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN)

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Bastian SSES Rehabilitation

County: Bland

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Bland County

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 0.20 MGD Average Flow: 0.098 MGD Receiving Stream: Wolf Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper New River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 411 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards: Reduce I/I and the resultant likelihood of system overflows.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 810,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $1,971

Bastian Wastewater Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP). SSES has been completed.

Information not provided. SSES report has been completed and the resulting recommended improvements were estimated to cost $810,000.

Information not provided (INP). Cost estimated based upon DEQ funding amount requested following the SSES completion

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

imstesevn: ver

Residential = #11 Commercial= Industrial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Beaver Creek Interceptor Rehabilitation Project

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1653 Commercial = 247 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 9,532,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $5,017

The interceptor is the main conveyance line in the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed. It was constructed more than 50

years ago and has deteriorated significantly.

Very Feasible - The improvements on the interceptor will significantly reduce I/I, thus increase capacity for the

area.

The project consists of relining approximately 19,000 linear feet of 32-inch and smaller gravity sewer and

rehabilitating approximately 96 manholes.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Beaver Creek Interceptor EQ Basin

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 2670 Commercial = 400 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $7,294,000

Present Worth Per Connection: $2,376

The capacity of the Beaver Creek interceptor becomes greatly reduced during wet weather events resulting in

multiple overflows. Accordingly, installing a 2-million gallon EQ Basin will help minimize these overflows.

The project consists of constructing a 2-million gallon Equalization Basin and the replacement of approximately

1,660 linear feet of undersized gravity sewer main.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

Very Feasible - The installation of the EQ Basin and the replacement of undersized gravity sewer main will

minimize the number and magnitude of SSO’s in the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: BC-1568 Rehabilitation Project

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 534 Commercial = 76 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $5,253,543

Present Worth Per Connection: $8,612

The BC-1568 project is in the southern area of the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed and conveys leachate flows from

the City of Bristol, VA landfill. Nearly 50% of this sub-basin was installed more than 50 years ago and has

deteriorated significantly.

The project consists of relining approximately 6,000 LF, pipe bursitng approximatley 4,400 LF, and the

replacement of 4,350 LF of gravity sewer and rehabilitating and replacement of approximately 50 manholes.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

Very Feasible - The improvements in this area will increase the capcity of the system via I/I removal, thus

reducing the number and magnitude of SSO’s. Given that this sub-basin conveys leachate from the City’s

landfill, preventing SSO’s will make a significant environmental impact.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: BC-1301 Rehabilitation Project

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 267 Commercial = 38 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $2,867,800

Present Worth Per Connection: $9,403

The BC-1301 project is in the downtown area of the City of Bristol in the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed. Most of

the sewer system in this sub-basin was installed more than 50 years ago and has deteriorated significantly.

The project consists of relining and replacement of approximately 8,000 LF, and rehabilitating and replacement

of approximately 30 manholes.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

Very Feasible - The improvements in this area will increase the capcity of the system via I/I removal, thus

reducing the number and magnitude of SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Beaver Creek Interceptor Rehabilitation Project - Phase 2

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 4000 Commercial = 600 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $15,000,000

Present Worth Per Connection: $3,261

The interceptor is the main conveyance line in the Beaver Creek Sewer Shed. It was constructed more than 50

years ago and has deteriorated significantly.

The project consists of replacing approximately 3,600 linear feet of 32-inch and smaller gravity sewer and

replacinging approximately 30 manholes.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

Very Feasible - The improvements on the interceptor will significantly reduce I/I, increase capacity for the area,

and minimize SSO’s

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Sinking Creek Rehabilitation Project

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 670 Commercial = 100 Industrial = 3

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $2,867,800

Present Worth Per Connection: $3,710

The Sinking Creek Sewer Shed is on the Southeast side of BVU’s system and conveys sewer from residential

and industrial customers to the City of Bristol, TN. Portions of this system was installed 30-40 years ago and

nearly 50% has deteriorated significantly.

The project consists of relining and replacement of approximately 25,650 LF of 15-inch and smaller gravity

sewer line.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

Very Feasible - The improvements in this area will increase the capcity of the system via I/I removal, thus

reducing the number and magnitude of SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Gate City Highway Rehabilitation Project

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 335 Commercial = 50 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: $1,526,850

Present Worth Per Connection: $3,966

The Gate City Highway Sewer Shed is the western most sewer shed of BVU’s system and conveys sewer from

residential and comercial customers to the City of Bristol, TN. Portions of this system was installed 30-40 years

ago and nearly 50% has deteriorated significantly.

The project consists of relining and replacement of approximately 6,000 LF of 12-inch and smaller gravity sewer

line.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

Very Feasible - The improvements in this area will increase the capcity of the system via I/I removal, thus

reducing the number and magnitude of SSO’s.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Little Creek Interceptor Rehabilitation Project

County: Washington (City of Bristol)

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: BVU Authority

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 15.00 MGD

Average Flow: 9 MGD

Receiving Stream: Beaver Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Beaver Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

(Tennessee & Big Sandy River Basins)

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1653 Commercial = 247 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: $3,250,000

Present Worth Per Connection: $1,711

The interceptor is the main conveyance line in the Little Creek Sewer Shed. It was constructed more than 50

years ago and has deteriorated significantly.

The project consists of replacing and/or relining approximately 5,000 linear feet of 24-inch and smaller gravity

sewer.

City of Bristol, Tennessee WWTP

Very Feasible - The improvements on the interceptor will significantly reduce I/I, thus increase capacity for the

area.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planning District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty:

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow: McD Average Flow: McD

Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Sveam (YIN):

Name: Impaired (YIN): | |

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: I-77 Exit 1 Wastewater System Improvements Project

County: Carroll

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Carroll County PSA

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 0.02 MGD Average Flow: 0.009 MGD Receiving Stream: Stony Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Yadkin - Pee Dee Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 0 Commercial = 3 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - low Commercial - High Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 2,632,033$

Present Worth Per Connection: $877,344

I-77 Exit 1 Wastewater Treatment Plant

Regional project with participation by the Carroll County PSA, VDOT, NCDOT, and the City of Mount Airy.

The proposed project would involve constructing a pump station and force main connecting to a planned sewer extension from the NCDOT I-77 Welcome Center to the City of Mount Airy’s collection system. Once connected to the Mount Airy system, the CCPSA’s Exit 1 WWTP would be closed and taken out of service. Likewise, two other packaged WWTPs serving the NCDOT and VDOT Welcome Centers would be closed - eliminating three permitted WWTP discharges.

Existing 20,000 GPD packaged WWTP has experienced numerous effluent violations resulting in DEQ Enforcement actions.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification Impaired Stream (YIN:

Name:

insted en:

Residential = 0 Commercial= 3 Industrial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: System-Wide Sewer Improvements Project

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Chilhowie

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 1.00 MGD Average Flow: 0.248 MGD Receiving Stream: Middle Fork of the Holston River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Middle Fork Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1039 Commercial = 130 Industrial = 6

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - High Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 3,200,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $2,723

Chilhowie Regional Water Treatment Plant

Approximately half of the existing gravity sewer system was constructed more than 30 years ago and has deteriorated significantly, resulting in significant I/I flows. Thus the Town’s system experiences SSO’s during wet weather events and increased flows in the the WWTP.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the sewer conveyance will significantly reduce I/I, thus increasing capacity for the area, and reduce SSO’s.

The project consists of improving gravity sewer lines and manholes throughout the system, where system improvements remain to be completed.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County:

Planning District:

Ubtity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (Y/N):

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Residential = 1038 Commercial= 130 Industrial =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Fort Chiswell Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 1.25 MGD Average Flow: 0.419 MGD Receiving Stream: Reed Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper New River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 674 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Moderate Industrial - High

Total Project Cost: 8,185,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $12,144

Fort Chiswell Wastewater Treatment Plant

PER completed for the project and Wythe County is proceeding with efforts to expand the WWTP due primarily due to industrial growth at Progress Park.

The proposed project would involve doubling the WWTP capacity from 1.25 MGD up to 2.5 MGD.

Existing WWTP planned to increase treatment capacity in order to accommodate industrial growth.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

imstesevn: ver

Residential = © 878 Commercial= —ndustial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Fries Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project

County: Grayson

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Fries

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 0.22 MGD Average Flow: 0.085 MGD Receiving Stream: New River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper New River Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 300 Commercial = 10 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 1,471,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $4,745

Fries Wastewater Treatment Plant

Very Feasible - The improvements to the WWTP will help to alleviate the risk of WWTP due to numerous components that are out of service

The proposed project would include the replacement of influent pumps and controls, replacement of aerators, clarifier drives, and additional miscellaneous improvements.

Several treatment components are no longer working or functioning properly. Those that are working have exceeded their life expectancy and are in desparate need of replacement.

Project Name: county

Plonning District:

silty Provider:

Served by Public Water (YIN

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Heath Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

Name:

Inpeims ene ETS

Commercial= 10 Industrial =

Residential =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Galax Sewer System I&I Improvements

County: City of Galax

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: City of galax

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 3.00 MGD Average Flow: 1.678 MGD Receiving Stream: New River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): No

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper New River Impaired (Y/N): No

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 2400 Commercial = 460 Industrial = 40

Health Hazards: Reduce I/I and the resultant likelihood of system overflows.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 10,875,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $3,750

City of Galax Wastewater Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP). SSES has not yet been completed.

Information not provided. SSES has not been completed. City completed several system improvements projects in recent years. Cost of I/I improvements estimated using $7,500/connection and approximated to cover roughly half of the system’s customer base.

Information not provided (INP). Cost estimated based upon using $7,500/connection for entire system.

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

insted en:

Residential = ©2400 Commercial= 460. Industial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Town of Hillsville SSES

County: Carroll

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Hillsville

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 1.25 MGD

Average Flow: 0.375 MGD

Receiving Stream: Little Reed Island Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Little Reed Island Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1050 Commercial = 180 Industrial = 4

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - High

Commercial - High

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 5,600,000$

Cost Per Connection: $4,538

Town of Hillsville Wastewater Treatment Plant

The current system has areas that are in need of rehab due to their age.

Very Feasible - The improvements to the wastewater system will address the systems aging infrastructure.

The project consists of lining of sewer main, cementitious lining of 32 manholes, CCTV of sewer main, lining of

additional manholes.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning Distt:

Utity Provider:

Served by Public Water (VIN)

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stroam:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibity

Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Cost Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN)

‘Name: Impaired (YN): | |

Resident

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Sewer Line CIPP-Lining (North Independence Avenue) & Manhole Rehabilitation

County: Grayson

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Independence

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name:

Design Flow: 0.47 MGD

Average Flow: 0.298 MGD

Receiving Stream: Peach Bottom Creek

Stream Classification: IV

Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Peach Bottom Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 110 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate

Commercial - Moderate

Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 1,010,840$

Present Worth Per Connection: $9,189

Independence Sewage Treatment Plant

The northernmost section of the Town’s gravity sewer system was installed several decades ago. Accordingly,

several lines in this area have deteriorated, allowing I/I into the system resulting in system SSO’s and increased

flows at the Town’s WWTP.

Very Feasible - The improvements on the main gravity line in this area will significantly reduce I/I, thus increase

capacity for the area, reduce SSO’s, and reduce the total amount of flows to the WWTP during wet weather

periods.

The project consists of relining approximately 5,600 linear feet of 10-inch and smaller gravity sewer and

rehabilitating approximately 30 manholes.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name Couny:

Planing District:

sity Provider:

Served by Public Water (IN)

Existing Conditions

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibilty

Growth Potenti:

Total Project Cost:

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name:

Design Flow: MGD ‘Average Flow: McD Receiving Stream:

‘Stream Classification:

Impaired Sveam (YIN):

— a

10 Commercial= Industral =

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Marion SSES Rehabilitation

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Marion

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 3.40 MGD Average Flow: 1.383 MGD Receiving Stream: Middle Fork Holston River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Staley Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 1830 Commercial = 1126 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards: Reduce I/I and the resultant likelihood of system overflows.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 1,300,488$

Present Worth Per Connection: $440

Marion Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant

SSES has been completed for a portion of the collection system.

SSES report has been completed and the resulting recommended improvements were estimated to cost $1,300,488.

Various segments of sewer line replacement, CIPP repairs, manhole rehabilitation and other related work.
Cost estimate based upon DEQ funding amount requested following the SSES completion

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

bmstesern: er)

Residential = ©4830 Commercial= 1126. Industial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Max Meadows SSES Rehabilitation

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Wythe County

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 1.25 MGD Average Flow: 0.419 MGD Receiving Stream: Reed Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper New River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 674 Commercial = Industrial =

Health Hazards: Reduce I/I and the resultant likelihood of system overflows.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 1,209,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $1,794

Fort Chiswell Wastewater Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP). SSES has been completed.

Information not provided. SSES report has been completed and the resulting recommended improvements were estimated to cost $1,967,137.

Information not provided (INP). Cost estimated based upon DEQ funding amount requested following the SSES completion

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

bmstesern: ver

Residential = 874 Commercial= ——ndustial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Rural Retreat Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Rural Retreat

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 0.25 MGD Average Flow: 0.233 MGD Receiving Stream: Reed Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper New River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 674 Commercial = 59 Industrial = 5

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Moderate Industrial - Moderate

Total Project Cost: 2,500,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $3,388

Rural Retreat Wastewater Treatment Plant

Unknown at this time - PER not yet completed. The cost of WWTP expansion from 0.25 MGD to 0.5 MGD has been approximated using a general cost value of $10/gallon/day of additional capacity.

The proposed project would include the replacement of the grit collector and installation of a screen at the influent pump station, replacement and relocation of aerators, replacement of UV disinfection system, and additional miscellaneous improvements.

Existing WWTP’s average daily flow during 2021 was about 93% of permitted capacity

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

Rural Retreat Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project Wyte MountRogers Town of RuralRetreat Yes

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

imstesevn: ver

Residential = 874 Commercial= 59 ndustrial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Saltville Phase 2 SSES Rehabilitation

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Saltville

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 0.99 MGD Average Flow: 0.331 MGD Receiving Stream: North Fork Holston River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: North Fork Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 880 Commercial = 61 Industrial = 2

Health Hazards: Reduce I/I and the resultant likelihood of system overflows.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 1,476,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $1,565

Saltville Wastewater Treatment Plant

SSES has been completed for a second area of the collection system.

SSES report has been completed and the resulting recommended improvements were estimated to cost $1,476,000.

Various segments of sewer line replacement, CIPP repairs, manhole rehabilitation and other related work.
Cost estimate based upon DEQ funding amount requested following the SSES completion

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

| :

imstesevn: ver

Residential = 880 Commercial= = 61_——_Industial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Saltville Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Saltville

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 0.99 MGD Average Flow: 0.331 MGD Receiving Stream: North Fork Holston River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: North Fork Holston River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 880 Commercial = 61 Industrial = 2

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Moderate Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 2,500,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $2,651

Saltville Wastewater Treatment Plant

Very Feasible - The improvements to the WWTP will help to alleviate the risk of WWTP failure due to numerous components that are at risk of failure.

Several treatment components are no longer working or functioning properly. Those that are working have exceeded their life expectancy and are in desparate need of replacement.

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

imstesevn: ver

Residential = 880 Commercial= = 61_——_Industial=

| :

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Staley Creek SSES Rehabilitation

County: Smyth

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Smyth County

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 3.40 MGD Average Flow: 1.383 MGD Receiving Stream: Middle Fork Holston River Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Staley Creek Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 82 Commercial = 0 Industrial = 0

Health Hazards: Reduce I/I and the resultant likelihood of system overflows.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 500,000$

Present Worth Per Connection: $6,098

Marion Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP). SSES has been completed.

Information not provided. SSES report has been completed and the resulting recommended improvements were estimated to cost $500,000.

Information not provided (INP). Cost estimated based upon DEQ funding amount requested following the SSES completion

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

’ |

imstesevn: ver

Residential = 82 Commercial= 0 ndustial=

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project Name: Wytheville SSES Rehabilitation

County: Wythe

Planning District: Mount Rogers

Utility Provider: Town of Wytheville

Served by Public Water (Y/N): Yes

Existing Conditions:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP: Name: Design Flow: 4.00 MGD Average Flow: 2.07 MGD Receiving Stream: Reed Creek Stream Classification: IV Impaired Stream (Y/N): Yes

Watershed or Adjacent Stream: Name: Upper New River Impaired (Y/N): Yes

Equivalent Customers Served: Residential = 2754 Commercial = 426 Industrial = 26

Health Hazards: Reduce I/I and the resultant likelihood of system overflows.

Construction Feasibility:

Growth Potential: Residential - Low Commercial - Low Industrial - Low

Total Project Cost: 1,967,137$

Present Worth Per Connection: $614

Wytheville Wastewater Treatment Plant

Information not provided (INP). SSES has been completed.

Information not provided. SSES report has been completed and the resulting recommended improvements were estimated to cost $1,967,137.

Information not provided (INP). Cost estimated based upon DEQ funding amount requested following the SSES completion

Project Name: County

Planning District

Utity Provider:

‘Served by Public Water (YIN)

Existing Concitons:

Proposed Project:

Existing WWTP:

Watershed or Adjacent Stream:

Equivalent Customers Served:

Health Hazards:

Construction Feasibility:

‘Growth Potential:

Total Project Cost

Present Worth Per Connection:

PROJECT DATA SHEET

Name: Design Flow:

‘Average Flow: Receiving Stream: ‘Stream Classification: Impaired Stream (YIN):

Name:

imstesevn: ver

Residential = ©2754 Commercial= 426. Industial=

APPENDIX D

UNIFORM COST ESTIMATING SUPPORT DATA

In development of construction cost estimates for potential sewer line extensions, generalized unit cost estimates were prepared in all locations where a previous PER or CIP was not available. The unit costs were established using averages of recent bid results.

APPENDIX D

UNIFORM COST ESTIMATING SUPPORT DATA

bid results.

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO GRAVITY SEWER

1 EA. Wye and saddle @ $250 /EA. $250

1 EA. Cleanout @ $750 /EA. $750

50 L.F. 4-inch Service Lateral @ $65 /L.F. $3,250

Gravity Sewer Connection, EA. $4,250

SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO FORCE MAIN

1 EA. Grinder Pump Station @ $22,000 /EA. $22,000

40 L.F. 1 1/4-inch Service Lateral @ $25 /L.F. $1,000

10 L.F. 4-inch Service Lateral @ $65 /L.F. $650

Force Main Connection, EA. $23,650

15-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 L.F. 15-inch Gravity Sewer @ $295 /L.F. $2,950,000

34 EA. Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. $170,000

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $70,000 /EA. $70,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $40 /Ton $2,000

25 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $7,500

Total $3,212,250

15-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L.F. $321

Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Study

October 2022 1

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO GRAVITY SEWER

1 EA. Wye and saddle @ $250 /EA. 1 EA. Cleanout @ $750 JEA 50 LF. 4-inch Service Lateral @ $65 ILF.

Gravity Sewer Connection, EA.

SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO FORCE MAIN

EA. Grinder Purp Station @ $22,000 /EA. 40 LF. | 1/4.inch Service Lateral @ $25 (LF. 10 LF. 4inch Service Lateral @ $65 ILE.

Force Main Connection, EA.

15-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 LF. 15-inch Gravity Sewer @ $295 (LF. 34 EA Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. | EA Road Crossing @ {$70,000 /EA. | EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. 50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $40 /Ton 25 CY. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /CY. Total

15-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, LF.

west Virginia Regional Sewer Study er 2022

$250 $750 $3,250

$22,000 $1,000 $650

$2,950,000 $170,000 $70,000 $12,750 $2,000 $7,500

$3,212,250

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

12-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 L.F. 12-inch Gravity Sewer @ $250 /L.F. $2,500,000

34 EA. Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. $170,000

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $60,000 /EA. $60,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $40 /Ton $2,000

25 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $7,500

Total $2,752,250

12-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L.F. $275

10-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 L.F. 10-inch Gravity Sewer @ $215 /L.F. $2,150,000

34 EA. Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. $170,000

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $55,000 /EA. $55,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $40 /Ton $2,000

25 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $7,500

Total $2,397,250

10-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L.F. $240

8-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 L.F. 8-inch Gravity Sewer @ $185 /L.F. $1,850,000

34 EA. Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. $170,000

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. $50,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 /Ton $2,250

25 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $7,500

Total $2,092,500

8-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L.F. $209

Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Study

October 2022 2

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

12INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 LF. 12-inch Gravity Sewer @ $250 /LF 34 EA Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. | EA, Road Crossing @ {$60,000 /EA. | EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. 50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $40 /Ton 25 CX, Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 ICY. Total

I2sinch Gravity Sewer Cost, LF.

10-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 LF. 10-inch Gravity Sewer @ $215 LF

34 EA Manholes @ $5,000 /EA.

| EA. Road Crossing @ $55,000 /EA.

| EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 1A.

50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $40 /Ton

25 CY. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /CY. Total

10-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L.F.

8-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 LF. 8-inch Gravity Sewer @ $185 LF. 34 EA Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. 1 EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. | EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. 50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 [Ton 25 CX. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /CY. Total

inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L.F.

west Virginia Regional Sewer Study er 2022

$2,500,000 $170,000 $60,000 $12,750 $2,000 $7,500

$2,752,250

$2,150,000 $170,000 $55,000 $12,750 $2,000 $7,500

$2,397,250

$1,850,000 $170,000 $50,000 $12,750 $2,250 $7,500

$2,092,500

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

6-INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 L.F. 6-inch Gravity Sewer @ $130 /L.F. $1,300,000

34 EA. Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. $170,000

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $45,000 /EA. $45,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 /Ton $2,250

25 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $7,500

Total $1,537,500

6-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L.F. $154

8-INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 L.F. 8-inch Force Main Sewer @ $140 /L.F. $1,400,000

20 EA. Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. $120,000

3 EA. Air Release/Vacuum Valve @ $7,500 /EA. $22,500

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. $50,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 /Ton $1,350

15 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $4,500

Total $1,611,100

8-inch Force Main Sewer Cost, L.F. $161

6-INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 L.F. 6-inch Force Main Sewer @ $125 /L.F. $1,250,000

20 EA. Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. $120,000

3 EA. Air Release/Vacuum Valve @ $7,500 /EA. $22,500

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. $50,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 /Ton $1,350

15 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $4,500

Total $1,461,100

6-inch Force Main Sewer Cost, L.F. $146

Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Study

October 2022 3

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

4INCH GRAVITY SEWER

10,000 LF. 6-inch Gravity Sewer @ $130 /LF 34 EA Manholes @ $5,000 /EA. | EA, Road Crossing @ $45,000 /EA. | EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. 50 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 [Ton 25 CY, Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 ICY. Total

6-inch Gravity Sewer Cost, L-F.

‘8INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 LF. 8-inch Force Main Sewer @ $140 LE. 20 EA Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. 3 EA. Air Release/Vacuum Valve @ $7,500 /EA. | EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. | EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 IEA. 30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 [Ton 15 CY. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /CY. Total

inch Force Main Sewer Cost, LF.

6-INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 LF. é-inch Force Main Sewer @ $125 (LE. 20 EA. Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. 3 EA. Air Release/Vacuum Valve @ $7,500 /EA. 1 EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. | EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. 30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 [Ton 15 CY. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /CY. Total

inch Force Main Sewer Cost, L.F.

west Virginia Regional Sewer Study er 2022

$1,300,000 $170,000 $45,000 $12,750 $2,250 $7,500

$1,537,500

$1,400,000 $120,000 $22,500 $50,000 $12,750 $1,350 $4,500

$1,611,100

$1,250,000 $120,000 $22,500 $50,000 $12,750 $1,350 $4,500

$1,461,100

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

4-INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 L.F. 4-inch Force Main Sewer @ $100 /L.F. $1,000,000

20 EA. Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. $120,000

3 EA. Air Release/Vacuum Valve @ $7,500 /EA. $22,500

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. $50,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 /Ton $1,350

15 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $4,500

Total $1,211,100

4-inch Force Main Sewer Cost, L.F. $121

2-INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 L.F. 2-inch Force Main Sewer @ $75 /L.F. $750,000

20 EA. Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. $120,000

3 EA. Air Release/Vacuum Valve @ $7,500 /EA. $22,500

1 EA. Road Crossing @ $50,000 /EA. $50,000

1 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750

30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 /Ton $1,350

15 C.Y. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /C.Y. $4,500

Total $961,100

2-inch Force Main Sewer Cost, L.F. $96

Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Study

October 2022 4

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

4-INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 LF. 4-inch Force Main Sewer @ $100 /LEF $1,000,000

20 EA Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. $120,000

3 EA. Air Release/Vacuumn Valve @ $7,500 /EA. $22,500

| EA. Road Crossing @ {$50,000 /EA. $50,000

| EA, Stream Crossing @ $12,750 (EA. $12,750

30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 [Ton $1,350

15 CY. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 /CY. $4,500 Total $1,211,100

‘inch Force Main Sewer Cort, LF. (omy

INCH FORCE MAIN SEWER

10,000 LF. 2-inch Force Main Sewer @ $75 ILF. $750,000 20 EA. Force Main Cleanout @ $6,000 /EA. $120,000 3 EA Air Release/Vacuum Valve @ $7,500 IEA. $22,500 1 EA. Road Crossing @ {$50,000 /EA. $50,000 EA. Stream Crossing @ $12,750 /EA. $12,750 30 Tons Miscellaneous Aggregate @ $45 (Ton $1,350 15 CY. Miscellaneous Concrete @ $300 ICY. $4,500 Total $961,100

inch Force Main Sewer Cost, L.F. | |

west Virginia Regional Sewer Study er 2022

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

SEWAGE PUMP STATION

Sewage Pump Station, EA. $300,000

GRINDER PUMP STATION

Grinder Pump Station, EA. $95,000

PLANT EXPANSION / I & I REMEDIATION

Plant Expansion / I & I Remediation, Per Connection, EA. $7,500

NEW TREATMENT FACILITIES

0 - 25,000 Gallons/Day (GPD) $25/GPD

25,001 - 50,000 GPD $20/GPD

50,001 - 100,000 GPD $15/GPD

100,001 - 300,000 GPD $10/GPD

RAILROAD CROSSINGS

Railroad Crossings, EA $100,000

Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Study

October 2022 5

UNIT COSTS - CONSTRUCTION

SEWAGE PUMP STATION

‘Sewage Pump Station, EA.

GRINDER PUMP STATION

Grinder Pump Station, EA.

PLANT EXPANSION || & | REMEDIATION

Plant Expansion / 1 & | Remedi

NEW TREATMENT FACILITIES 0 - 25,000 Gallons/Day (GPD) 25,001 - 50,000 GPD.

50,001 - 100,000 GPD. 100,001 - 300,000 GPD

RAILROAD CROSSINGS

Railroad Crossings, EA

west Virginia Regional Sewer Study er 2022

GRAVITY SEWER

Gravity Sewer, L.F. $0.85

FORCE MAIN

Force Main, L.F. $0.85

SEWAGE PUMP STATION

Sewage Pump Station, EA. $7,500

GRINDER PUMP STATION

Grinder Pump Station, EA. $4,500

UNIT COSTS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Study

October 2022 6

UNIT COSTS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

GRAVITY SEWER

Gravity Sewer, LF.

FORCE MAIN

Force Main, LF.

SEWAGE PUMP STATION

‘Sewage Pump Station, EA.

GRINDER PUMP STATION

Grinder Pump Station, EA.

Southwest Virginia Regional Sewer Suidy ‘October 2022

APPENDIX E

VDH LETTERS

This Appendix includes letters provided by the respective Health Districts, discussing known problematic areas in need of sewer service.

APPENDIX E

VDH LETTERS

This Appendix includes letters provided by the respective Health Districts, discussing known problematic areas in need of sewer service.

Buchanan County Dickenson County Russell County Tazewell County

P.O. Box 618 P.O, Box 768, P.O. Box 2347 P.O. Box 350

1051 Rosebud Road 334 Brush Creck Road 133 Highland Drive, 23 Chamber Drive Grundy, VA 24614 Clintwood, VA. 24228 Suite A Tazewell, VA 24651 Phone: 276-935-4591 Phone: 276-926-4979 Lebanon, VA 24266 Phone: 276-988-5585 Fax: 276935-4537 Fax: 276.926.4426 Phone: 276-889-7621 Pax: 276-988-5471

Fax: 276-899-7699

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

[Noelle Bissell, MD — Interim Director Cumberland Plateau Health District ey Reisa L. Sloce, Chief Operations Officer 133 Highland Drive, Suite A ‘Community Health Lebanon, VA 2426

“CPHD: Protecting You and Your Environment ~ Better Health, Better Home, Better Horizons!”

November 2, 2022

Jim Baldwin, CEO

Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission 224 Clydesway Drive

Lebanon, VA 24266

RE: — Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study 2022 Counties of Buchanan, Dickenson, Russell, and Tazewell

Dear Mr. Baldwin:

‘Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the 2022 update to the Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study (Study). Since the original 2005 Study, approved wastewater collection and treatment systems have been provided to several communities identified in the 2005 Study; however, there are still communities identified in the 2005 Study that have not been addressed. The Cumberland Plateau Health District (CPHD) would like to continue to draw attention to these communities identified in the 2005 Study that remain to be provided with approved wastewater collection and treatment systems and also draw attention to other communities identified since the 2005 Study. Areas of concern identified in the 2005 Study below are not further elaborated upon unless noted and additional areas of concern identified are noted below.

Buchanan County

Leemaster/Lovers Gap Sewer Extension — This area is identified in the 2005 Study. Public sewer extension along state route 83 to Lovers Gap would allow for proposed

future development of the Poplar Gap area.

Lower Mill Branch/Elkins Branch Sewer Extension ~ ‘This area is identified in the 2005 Study.

Y VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT Jor HEALTH

Jim Baldwin November 2, 2022 Page 8 of §

Systems and VDH’s regulations do require these system to be operated and maintained by a licensed Master Alternative Operator and the results of the maintenance and testing submitted to the local health department. The far Southwestern region of Virginia lacks an adequate number of licensed operators to perform this service long term. Actually, there is currently only 1 provider in the area who is providing this service. As time goes on, the local health departments have concerns that owners of these alternative systems will not have adequate access to licensed operators to operate and maintain their systems and meet regulatory requirements,

Providing public sewer or decentralized sewer service to the areas mentioned above would alleviate existing and potential health hazards due to failing or substandard onsite sewage disposal systems. Also, evaluating how to maintain existing onsite systems weather they are a conventional or alternative onsite systems on a regional bases would help alleviate future problems before they may arise.

‘Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the update to the Study. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (276) 415-3370 or via email at

Brian.St )vdh.vi pov. Sincerely,

nb St Brian Stanley

Environmental Health Manager, Senior Cumberland Plateau Health District

Y VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT Jor HEALTH

Lee County Seott County Wise County and the

P.O. Box 763 190 Beech Steet ity of Norion

134 Hill Steet Suite 102 134 Roberts Ave, SW Jonesville, VA. 24263, Gate City, VA 24251 Wise, VA 24203 Phone: 276-346-2011 Phone: 276-386-1312 Phone: 276-328-8000

Fax 27646-0401 Fax: 276-386-2116 Fax: 276-376-1020

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

LENOWISCO HEALTH DISTRICT Noelle Bissell, MD — Interim Director 134 Roberts Avenue, SW Stewards for Optimum Reisa L. Sloce, Chief Operations Officer WISE, VIRGINIA 24293 Community Health

October 14, 2022

‘The Lane Group Attn: Kevin Heath, PE 119 North Main St. Galax, VA 24333

Dear Mr. Heath:

The LENOWISCO Health District appreciates the opportunity to participate in planning for a new/updated Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study. Looking back on the original document, itis exciting to see the progress made since 2005, and that progress gives great hope of seeing other projects completed in the future. Listed below are areas within the LENOWISCO Health District with known and/or identified issues of failing/aging sewage disposal systems, straight piping, and/or poor soil conditions for onsite sewage disposal

Lee County

Woodway community ~ The area of most concern in Woodway is south of the Powell River along State Route 421. This area is characterized by Karst topography with many sink holes, caves, and limestone outcrops. In the past, homes have been found to be discharging sewage directly into caves. Since 2002, 19 repair applications have been processed in this area and three applications for new systems have been denied due to site and soil conditions. There are three alternative onsite sewage disposal systems (AOSS) in the area,

Keokee community ~ Keokee is a coal camp community. Many of the homes in the community are more than 50 years old and are served by septic systems similar in age. Soils are typically shallow to sandstone or shale and the lots are small in size. ‘The ‘old Keokee High School gym is served by an alternative discharging system.

Dr. Thomas Walker Highway ~The area of concern is the section bordering Indian Creek. In 2021, a home was found with an overflow to the stream. Given the landscape position of many homes between the stream and highway, itis likely that this scenario is occurring in other places as well.

St. Charles area ~ Areas outside of the St Charles sewage collection system are served by septic systems or, potentially, straight pipes. The vast majority of these septic systems are more than 30 years old. The entire Stone Creek watershed is listed on the Department of Environmental Quality’s 303d List of Impaired Waters (DEQ’s 303d list) as having an impairment due to elevated levels of Escherichia coli (E. coli). Given this area lacks any agricultural activity, human sources are likely the primary cause for this impairment.

Scott County

Hiltons — The area of greatest concern is from the Wadlow Gap Road intersection to the immediate vicinity of Hilton Elementary School. Soils are typically very shallow to shale and many homes are located in low-lying areas near the stream. Since 2002, 14 repairs or systems have been installed, 12 applications have been denied and there are three alternative discharging systems (ADS) and one AOSS in the community. Hilton Creek is listed as having an impairment due to elevated levels of E. coli.

‘There are two ADS along the road and a now vacant home that once straight piped. This would seem a relatively easy extension of St. Paul sewer service.

Russell Creek ~ Russell Creek flows from Virginia City (an old coal camp community), under Highway 58 to the Clinch River. Soils are shallow to rock and many existing home are close to the stream, ‘There are six ADS in the watershed serving seven homes,

Honey Branch ~ Honey Branch includes portions of Wise County and portions of Russell County. ‘The portion of the watershed in Wise County typically has homes wedged between a steep slope and the stream. Soils are generally alluvial and sandy. Most septic systems are over 30 years old. There are three ADS in the watershed. Honey Branch is listed on the Department of Environmental Quality’s 303d List of Impaired Waters (DEQ’s 303d list) as having an impairment due to elevated levels of E. coli. There is little agriculture in the watershed, so human sources are the most likely issue.

Killen Hollow ~ Killen Hollow Road is just south of Pound town limits. A small branch to Indian Creek runs parallel to the road. ‘The soils are generally shallow to shale and many of the homes are located close to the stream and where the water tables are shallow. There are four ADS in the area. ‘The intersection with Indian Creek Road is close to a publ ‘The lower segment of Indian Creek is listed on the Department of Environmental Quality’s 303d List of Impaired Waters (DEQ’s 303d list) as having an impairment due to elevated levels of E. coli.

‘South Fork Road/Dewey Road ~ This area encompasses the entire South Fork of the Pound River watershed. Many homes in this ‘area are located close to the stream and have septic systems older than 30 years. A significant portion of the watershed’s land area is reclaimed surface mines and fill material cannot be used for onsite sewage disposal systems. Since 2002, 12 applications have been denied and seven repair systems have been installed. ‘There are four ADS and one AOSS in the watershed. The South Fork of the Pound River is listed on the Department of Environmental Quality’s 303d List of Impaired Waters (DEQ’s 303d list) as having an impairment due to elevated levels of E. coli,

‘Thank you again for seeking the input of the LENOWISCO Health District on the new/revis Wastewater Study. Please let me know if you have questions regarding these areas of need.

Southwest Virginia Regional

ly,

Bradley Stallard Environmental Health Manager, Sr.

CC: William Skeen, Onsite Systems Engineering my Adkins, LENOWISCO Planning District Commission

Noelle Bisel, MD, Acting Director Phone: 276-781-7450,

Fax; 276-781-7455

LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS ‘SERVING THE PEOPLE OF Bland wthe canoll Galax Grayson ‘Seth Washington

Bre COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Mount Rogers Health District 201 Francis Marion Lane Marion, VA 25354

smal oul bss vdh vgn. gov

September 30, 2022

Joe Blevins, Project Manager Mount Rogers Planning District Commission 102t Terrace Drive Marion, VA 24354

RE: Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study 2022 Washington County and Smyth County

Dear Mr. Blevins,

Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study. The Mount Rogers Health District would like to draw attention to several communities in Washington County and Smyth County that could benefit greatly from public sewer service or a community based sewage disposal system. Those include High Meadows Subdivision, Lowry Hills Subdivision, Larwood Acres Subdivision, Greenfield Mobile Home Park, and the Clinchburg community in Washington County. In Smyth County, it includes the corridor of Lee Hwy in Atkins to Exit 54 of Interstate 81.

: sion is located near High Point Elementary School in the Bristol area of Washington County. There are approximately 132 homes in the subdivision and 163 lo’s. M of the homes in this subdivision were built between 1969 and 1980. Lot size averages about 0.4 acre. The Washington County Health Department has issued approximately 40 septic repair permits for this subdivision. Two lots were denied for new sewage disposal systems due to insufficient area and slow rates of soil absorption. The soils in this subdivision tend to be silty clay loam texture. Sewer appears to be available on nearby Sinking Creek Road.

Lowry Hills Subdivision Lowry Hills Subdivision is located between exit 7 and exit 10 of Interstate 81. It is located on the South side of the interstate and is accessed off of Lee Hwy by an interstate underpass. There are approximately 211 homes in the subdivision and about 258 lots. Most of the homes were constructed in the 1960’s to through the 1980’s. Lot size averages about 0.4 acre, The Washington County Health Department has issued approximately 66 repair permits since 1984

VD VDHis

for this subdivision, Five lots have been denied for new sewage disposal systems due to insufficient area, inadequate soils, and/or challenging contours. Of those five lots that were denied, two of them were combined to accommodate the sewage disposal for one home. The other three still have not been developed. Soils in this subdivision tend to be silty clay loar ot

. Sewer appears to be available North of the subdivision on Lee Hwy and South of ion on Virginia Trail.

Larwood Acres Subdivision is located in the Bristol area of Washington County on the North side of Interstate 81 off of Cunningham Road. There are approximately 109 homes in the subdivision and about 126 lots. Most of the homes were built between the late 1960’s and early 1970°s. Lot size averages about 0.3 acre. The Washington County Health Department has received approximately 41 applications for sewage disposal system repairs in Larwood Acres since 1984. he closest public sewer line is owned by Bristol Virginia Utilities and is located across 181.

Greenfield Mobile Home Park

Greenfield Mobile Home Park is located near exit 10 of Interstate 81 on the North side of the interstate and Lee Hwy. The Washington County Health Department has fielded numerous complaints of sewage backing up into homes and coming to the surface of the ground in this mobile home park over the years. Environmental Health staff found most of those complaints to be valid and required corrections. Four repair permits have been issued by the Washington County Health Department. Many of the sewage violations were corrected through sewage system maintenance; however, the violations continue to occur periodically. There are about 80 mobile homes in the park. The majority of sewage disposal systems are 30+ years old and most systems serve two homes. It appears that public sewer is available on the South side of Lee Hwy just actoss from the mobile home park.

chburg Community

Clinchburg is located in the Meadowview area of Washington County near the intersection of Old Saltworks Road and Clinchburg Road. Most of the homes were built between the 1920’s and 1950"s. The lots are very small. Most are about 0.2 acre. There are about 50 homes in this general area. The Washington County Health Department has issued at Jeast 4 repair permits, two of which were to install sewage disposal systems to replace privies. The existing sewage disposal systems are very old and due to the very small lots repairs are almost impossible. Public water is available to this community, but there are still old wells that have to be taken into consideration when repairing septic systems. Public sewer is nowhere near this area, so a system to serve the community would be the best option.

Lee Hwy Corridor through Atkins to Exit 54 of 181

Certain site conditions exist along the Lee Highway corridor from 6373 Lee Highway in Atkins to exit 54 of Interstate 81 that make the installation or repair of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems challenging or even impossible. Some examples would be limited area, unfavorable landscape positions, shallow water table, shallow bedrock, existing private wells, springs, or surface waters. For example, the intersection of Lee Highway and Windsor Road near exit 54 is home to several businesses including « hotel, two restaurants, and two convenience

stores / gas stations. However, the landscape near this intersection, particularly the northwest comer, is low lying and the seasonal water table is shallow. Any repairs to the onsite sewage disposal systems serving these businesses would be difficult, costly, and could potentially even impact the businesses” ability to operate.

‘The lack of public sewer along this section of Lee Highway also limits business opportunities. Onsite sewage disposal systems to serve commercial businesses with high wastewater flows such as restaurants or hotels take up a very large area of land, Having access to public utilities is vital to finding a good location for such commercial facilities. For example, 7412 Lee Hwy has been a restaurant, but seating capacity is limited due to the capacity of the onsite sewage system. Multiple people have inquired about possibilities at this location, but have been discouraged by the limitations of the onsite sewage disposal system. Expanding the system to allow for more business opportunities would require a large investment to bring the system into compliance with current regulations.

Approximately 50% of the residential properties that abut Lee Highway between 6373 Lee Highway and exit 54 are over $0 years old. The vast majority of those homes are still served by the original onsite sewage disposal systems that were installed at the time the homes were built, As the lifespan of these systems comes to an end, connection to public sewer would be the best option due to limited area and challenging site conditions.

Tn Summary

Onsite sewage disposal systems do not last forever. The website EPA gov says “The lifespan of septic system depends on the material it is made of, the design, installation, service and exposure conditions, and maintenance of the system. If your septic system is more than 25 — 30 years old, start planning for an upgrade before you are in an emergency situation. It is likely your system is close to its useful lifespan.”

All of the locations mentioned above are plagued with aging sewage disposal systems and onsite system failures are becoming more common. The vast majority of lots referenced here were developed before a 50% reserve area for repairs was required by Virginia’s Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations. No reserve areas and small lot sizes have made repairs very difficult. Several lots are undevelopable due to limited area and unfavorable soil conditions or contours. Often a property owner’s only option to repair a failing sewage disposal syst is to invest in an alternative onsite sewage disposal system. These systems require annual maintenance.

The high cost to repair an onsite sewage disposal system may cause homeowners to postpone repairs. Sometimes, a homeowner may even be motivated to “repair” their system in a way that isn’t compliant with regulations. This creates a greater tisk to public health and the environment. Sinking Creek, which is located near High Meadows Subdivision, has been placed on DEQ’s 303(d) list of impaired waters due to high pathogen counts (F. coli). Residential use was identified and one of the potential causes.

Providing public sewer or community sewage disposal systems to the areas listed above would alleviate existing and potential health hazards due to failing onsite sewage disposal systems

and/or discharges of untreated wastewater into streams or ditches in the community. It would also provide options to develop vacant lots and enhance business opportunities

‘Thank you again for the opportunity to comment. Please feel {ree 1o contact me if you have questions or our office may be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

That Hatt

Travis Holt Environmental Health Manager

Noelle Bissell, MD, Acting Director Phone: 276-761-7450 Fax: 276-781-7455

LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS SERVING THE PFOPLE OF land Viythe Cerro Galax Grayson Sith Washington

rol COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Mount Rogers Health District 201 Francis Marion Lane Marion, VA 25354

Emil noellebissell@vdh virginia go

December 19, 2022

Joe Blevins

Mount Rogers Planning District Commission 1021 Terrace Drive

Marion, VA 24354

RE: Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study 2022 Wythe, Grayson and Carrol! Counties

Dear Mr. Blevins,

Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the Southwest Virginia Regional Wastewater Study. The Mount Rogers Health District would like to draw attention to several communities in Wythe, Grayson and Carroll Counties that could benefit greatly from public sewer service or a community-based sewage disposal system. Those include the Ivanhoe community, Crockett community and Speedwell c in Wythe County. In Grayson and Carroll Counties it inciudes the Fries community.

Ivanhoe Community

Ivanhoe is located in the southcentral area of Wythe County, boarding the New River and Carroll County. Hwy 94,/ ivanhoe Road dissects the Ivanhoe Community and runs from Fries in Grayson County to Fort Chiswell in Wythe County. The ivanhoe Community was once a mining and quarry-based community, Both the quarry and mining kas ceased. There are approximately 200 homes in the Ivanhoe Community in and around Hwy 94, The majerity of the homes were built between 1920 and 1980. Lot sizes are typically small around 0.5 acres or less. Several onsite sewage repairs have been permitted and installed in the ivanhoe community. With public sewer being several miles away the most I’kely improvement for wastewater infrastructure In the Ivanhoe community would be decentralized or cluster-based community sewage disposal systems.

Crockett Community

‘The Crockett community is located south if |-81 between Rural Retreat and Wytheville, Crockett is situated cn the Norfolk Southern railway. There are approximately 50 homes in the Crockett community with most being built between 1920 and 1970. Most lots are 0.5 acres are less. Small lots combined with shallow rock and shallow seasonal water table can make onsite sewage system repairs Cifficult. Similar to the Ivanhoe Community, public sewer is several miles away and the most likely

VDHE epGeenee,

improvement for wastewater infrastructure would be decentralized or cluster-based community sewage disposal systems.

Speedwell is located in the southwestern portion of Wythe County. Hwy 24 / Grayson Turnpike traverses the Speedwell Community and runs from Elk Creex in Grayson County to Wytheville in Wythe County. The Speedwell Community consists of an elementary school, a few small businesses and residential housing. The majority of the homes are located on small lots and were built between 1920 and 1970, Similar to Ivanhoe and Crockett, Speedwell is several miles from public sewer and would be best served by decentralized or cluster-based community sewage disposal systems.

Fries Community The Fries Cornmunity is located in both Grayson County and Carroll County. The Town of Fries is currently served by public sewer. However, there are several areas just outside the Town of Fries that could benefit from public sewer extensions in Grayson and Carroll Counties. Clusters of homes ("100 to 150) along Hwy 94 and Tabernacle Road are within 1 mile of the heart of the Town of Fries. These homes are on small lots and were built between 1920 and 1960.

In Summary Onsite sewage disposal systems do not last forever. The website EPA.gov says “The lifespan of a septic system depends on the material it is made of, the design, installation, service and exposure conditions, and maintenance of the system. If your septic system is more than 25-30 years old, start planning fer ar. upgrade before you are in an emergency situation. It is likely your system Is close to its useful! lifespan.”

The locations mentioned above have aging sewage disposal systems and fallures will become more common, The vast majority of the communities referenced here were developed before a 50% reserve are for repairs was required by VA’s Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations. No reserve areas and small lot sizes have made repairs difficult. This often leads to failing systems not being corrected or much more costly alternative onsite sewage disposal systems being needed.

Providing public sewer or community sewage disposal systems to the areas listed above would allevi existing and potential health hazards due to failing onsite sewage disposal systems and or discharges of untreated wastewater into streams or ditches in the community.

Thank you again for the epportunity to comment. Please feet free to contact me if you have questions or our office may be of further assistance.

Sincerely, | Now Hoth Travis Holt

Environmental Health Manager

EXHIBIT I TO ATTACHMENT I

EXHIBIT | TO ATTACHMENT |

Mount Rocers HeattH District WASHINGTON County HeattH DerartMeNT

WASHINGTON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 2761645-0947

15068 Lee Hichway, Sure 1000 276IB7E-SEO8

2161876-5474. Bristow, Viecinia 24202 FAX 276/648-1004

FAX 276/669-2097 July 20, 2022

Robbie Comett, General Manager, WCSA. 25122 Regal Drive Abingdon, VA 24211

RE: Washington County Service Authority Lee Highway Sewer Line Extension Project

Dear Mr. Comet,

‘The Weshington County Health Department supports the Washington County Service Authority’s (WCSA) application requesting funding to extend public sewer services to Lee Highway and surrounding areas. The project would serve residential homes, churches, and businesses. The proposed project will 1, Extend public sewer service along Lee Highway in those Iocations presently not served between Oak Park Center for Business & Industry and Exit 10 and other surrounding areas, while making service available to approximately 140 new residential/commercial customers. And 2, Provide redirection of existing WCSA sewer systems in this area that ace currently being treated by BVUA to the Town of Abingdon for treatment (Greenbriar, Lee Highway, and King Mill Pike / Sinking Creek),

'so prove benefi to enable future sewer line extensions to aging subdivisions such as High Meadows, Lowry Hills, Evergreen Hills, Celia Heights, Greenbriar Estates, Highlander Subdivision, Woodstoze Bsiates, Preston Hills and others. These subdivisions are maturing and reaching the point that onsite failures are more common. Repairs have proven difficult due to small lot size and no designated reserve areas. Also, many of these subdivisions include lots that are not developable due to size and soil restrictions such as rock and shallow weter table. Often, property owners only option to repair a failing system or develop a lot is to invest in an alternative onsite sewage disposal system. ‘These systems are very costly and require at a minimum yearly maintenance. The project also looks to bring future public sewer to Bracland Meadows and Old Jonesboro Colony developments. These established subdivisions are not as old, but have larger homes that would greatly benedit from the availability of public sewer.

Onsite sewage disposal systems typically have a lifespan of 30 to 35 years. The majority of homes aad businesses in the project area kave or will scon exceed this lifespan. This office has processed 73 repair applicati is area since 2004. Of the 73 repair applications only 45 stalled and approved. The remaining 28 repair applications

VDH: _~

were cithor denied due to limited area or unsuitable soils, withézawn, or a permit wai was never installed and expired. Typica’ly when applicants withdraw a repair application it is because they cannot afford te lix the problem. Repair permits expire when the applicar? cannot afford to instal! the system and the failure continues. For exemple, an alternative onsite sewage system was designed to replace a faiting érainfield in an existing subdivision. The repair involved a secondary teatment unit and drip dispersa:. The installation cast would 5 $20,000 to $30,000. ‘The repair was neviz instal-ee. ‘This office has also denied 4 lots duc to insufficient arez and cock. The deveioper’s only option was ta cons‘de> an altemative system: that proved ‘0 ‘bo too costly. ‘There hays also been proposed commercial developments that have moved on due to lack of public sewer being available and onsite systems ro: being an option.

The projest area ineluccs Sinking Crock thet was placed on DEQ’s 303 (€) list of impaired waters, Sinking Creck’s -ee-catione. use was listed as impaired due co high pathogen counts (3. coli). Residential use was identified as one of he potential causes of high pathogen coun’s in Sinking Creek. This ftrther emphasizes the nee¢ for public sewer in this project area as high pathogen counts I:kely indicate stra:ght pipe discharges and failing sewage cisposa_ systems. ‘Vhis forther indicates that ‘here are many problems the health cepartmert is unaware of due to people’s fear of self-repo-ting “aihives and straight p’pe discharges.

‘This -uears that several residences are not in compliance with the Commonwealth of Virgicia’s Sewage Handling and Disposal Regulations Section 22. VAC 5-60-80 which states: A. The discharge of antreatec sewage onto the land or into the waters of the Corumonwealt is prohibitee

B. No owner, person, or occupant shall discharge lrealed or untveated sewage onto the land, into the soil or inte the waters of the Commonwealth without a vali¢ permit from the co-nmissionsr ov, as app-opziate, a cerlificule issued by ‘he Department of Kovironmersel Quality in acconiance with Tit‘e 62.1 af the Code af Virginia

©. All bi

bitation ard other places whe-e humans congregate shall be served ky an app-oved sewerage system and/or treatment works. An approved sewerage system or tealment

ngs, residences, anc structures desigrec for human occupancy, cmp.oyment

works is a system for which.a cectificate to operate has deen ‘ssued jointly by ‘he Cepariment and the Department of Rnvironmemal Quality or 2 system which has boon ‘ssued a separate perm’t by the commissione:.

‘The proposed sewer ‘ine extensions will alleviate existing ané polenta: hea‘th hazards that exist uc to felling septic systems end/or discharges af untreated wastewater into streams and d:tchos the commun’ty. The sewer line extension will also srovide additional options to vecant ‘ots that would otherwise be unsuitab‘e for development. “can envision cleaner stvea:ns, healthier coramunities and <hriving businesses as a result of this sewer line extension pro‘ect

Té you heve any questions or concerns please contact Travis Ilolt, Bavironmenta: Health Manager, al your earliest convenicace at the Washington County Health Department 276-576- SE74,

Sincerely,

Travis Holt FH Manager, Mount Rogers Health District

Co: William W. King, PE Senior Project Manager, Thompson & Litton 100 Fifth Street Bristol, TN 37620

APPENDIX F

VPDES GENERAL PERMITS

This Appendix includes a listing provided by the Health Department and DEQ for existing VPDES General Discharge Permitted facilities located within the three Planning District study areas. These are facilities which were not permitted for a conventional septic system and instead utilize a treatment system with a permitted discharge of less than 1,000 gallons/day to a stream or dry ditch.

APPENDIX F

VPDES GENERAL PERMITS

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400031 O & M CP N 1 Dickenson Breaks Interstate Park (2) STP State Route 80 Breaks

VAG400035 O & M CP N 1 Tazewell Busthead Inc. 3850 Indian Creek Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400036 O&M CP N 1 Tazewell Byrd Earbie Residence STP 267 Limestone Rd Pounding Mill

VAG400041 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Elswick Jay D Residence STP 142 Montclair Circle Rd Tazewell County

VAG400046 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Norris Screen & Manufacturing 21405 Gov G C Peery Hwy Tazewell

VAG400048 MC CP N 2 Tazewell Coal Fillers Incorporated 271 St Clairs Crossing Bluefield

VAG400050 O & M CP N 1 Buchanan Coleman Barry Residences STP Route 729 Vansant

VAG400064 O & M CP N 1 Buchanan Dellas Residences STP 6556 Slate Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400085 O & M CP Y 1 Tazewell Gilbert Mark Anthony Residence STP 129 Murray Hollow Rd Richlands

VAG400087 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Crigloo Properties, LLC STP Rte 83 Vansant

VAG400094 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Davis and Penley Residences STP 830 and 856 Willow Springs Road Cedar Bluff

VAG400096 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Scarberry Joyce Residence STP Maxie

VAG400105 O & M CP N 1 Buchanan Hurricane Baptist Church STP Rising Sun Rd Davenport

VAG400106 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Hylton Jimmy Dale Residence STP 1233 Green Shadows Rd Breaks

VAG400108 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Appalachian Air, Incorporated 2571 Lover’s Gap Rd Vansant

VAG400114 O & M CP N 1 Tazewell Morris Rodney Residence STP 790 Willow Spring Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400129 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Belcher Scott Residence STP 1011 Windward Dr Homecreek

VAG400130 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Fremont Train Station STP Intersection of Rte 63 & Rte 83 Clinchco

VAG400133 O & M CP Y 1 Russell McIntyre Rick Residence STP 2417 Cleveland Rd Cleveland

VAG400141 O & M CP N 1 Dickenson Mullins Residences STP 390 Willow Ln Clintwood

VAG400146 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Owens Carl E Residence STP 1122 Rife Circle Rd Pilgrim Knob

VAG400148 MC CP N 1 Tazewell PM Quick Mart - 12 Enterprise STP 14145 Gov GC Peery Hwy Pounding Mill

VAG400149 O & M CP N 1 Tazewell Mitchell Ronnie Residences STP 1457 Bandy Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400152 O & M CP N 2 Buchanan Presley Gaylene and Sherry Residences STP1047 Gravel Knoll Rd Buchanan Co

VAG400152 O & M CP N 2 Buchanan Presley Gaylene and Sherry Residences STP1045 Buchanan Co

VAG400155 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Rasnake Joley Residence STP 9865 Sandlick Rd Bee

VAG400175 O & M CP Y 1 Tazewell Shreve David Residence STP 2831 Daw Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400180 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Blankenship Jimmy Residence STP 1015 Hazelnut Rd Grundy

VAG400183 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Fugate Adam Residence STP 2736 Indian Creek Cedar Bluff

VAG400185 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Rasnake David Residence STP 7046 Dry Fork Rd North Tazewell

VAG400186 MC CP Y 1 Russell Wilson Burton Residence STP 3146 East Crossroads Rd Lebanon

VAG400190 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Taylor Larry K Residence STP Old Rocklick Rd Big Rock

VAG400191 MC CP N 2 Buchanan Thompson Enterprises STP 34630 Riverside Dr Big Rock

VAG400192 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Thompson Danny R Residence STP 1035 Navigator Rd Grundy

VAG400198 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Viers Harold G Residence STP 1202 Cranesnest Rd Vansant

VAG400199 CP Y 1 Buchanan Mullins Justin Residence STP St Rte 83 Buchanan Co

VAG400201 O & M CP Y 2 Tazewell Waldron Edith M Residence STP 106 Linkous Chapel Rd North Tazewell

VAG400211 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Wimmer Evelyn Residence STP 1140 Wimmer Gap Rd Whitewood

VAG400214 O & M CP Y 1 Tazewell Patton Michael Residence STP 561 Shannon Branch Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400216 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Justice Antoinette and Kim Residences STP 1114 Country Meadows Rd Breaks

VAG400239 O & M CP Y 2 Dickenson Wampler Dale Residence STP 424 Rakes Ridge Rd Birchleaf

VAG400257 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Large Randolph and Carolyn Residence STPRoute 1, Box 46 Bandy

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400258 MC CP N 2 Dickenson Splashdam Freewill Baptist Church STP 146 Kiwanis Park Rd Haysi

VAG400264 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Roberts Rodney L Residence STP 501 Birmingham Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400272 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Wolford Businesses STP 2870 Breaks Park Rd Haysi

VAG400277 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Belcher Rental Residences STP 2668 Breaks Park Rd Haysi

VAG400278 MC CP Y 1 Russell Hale Sandra Residence STP 207 Plasters Rd Swords Creek

VAG400279 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Super Stop, Inc 23271 Hwy 19 Cedar Bluff

VAG400280 MC CP N 1 Russell Double Kwik 58 STP Highway 19 Rosedale

VAG400284 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Clintwood Mills Scale House STP 1031 Chipmill Rd Clintwood

VAG400286 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Clintwood Mills STP 1031 Chipmill Rd Clintwood

VAG400291 O & M CP N 1 Russell Stone Mountain Health Services STP Highway 63 North St. Paul

VAG400295 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Breeding Rita Residence STP Justine Drive Birchleaf

VAG400302 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Mullins James and Donna Residence STP 6814 Dickenson Hwy Clintwood

VAG400303 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Moore Lester Residences STP 235 Flemingtown Rd Clintwood

VAG400304 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Wright Billie J Residence STP St Rte 91 Tazewell County

VAG400306 MC CP Y 2 Tazewell Richardson Timothy Residence STP 415 Earls Branch Rd Pounding Mill

VAG400314 CP Y 1 Tazewell Short Jason G Sr Residence STP 1376 Indian Creek Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400315 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Nunley Jami Residence STP 143 Mundytown Rd North Tazewell

VAG400316 X MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Hickman Teddy Residence STP 1012 King Solomon Colley Rd Breaks

VAG400317 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Vandyke Ronnie Residence STP Madison Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400327 X MC CP N 1 Tazewell Cottman Transmissions 11102 Governor G C Peery Highway Cedar Bluff

VAG400329 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Brooks Danny and Gloria Residences STP 210 Violet Trailer Park Clintwood

VAG400331 O & M CP Y 1 Tazewell Murray Donna B Residence STP 2796 Indian Creek Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400342 O & M CP N 1 Tazewell Ramaco Resources Land Holdings LLC - Tiller No 1 STPSt Rte 687 Raven

VAG400352 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Beavers Jason Residence STP 2754 Indian Creek Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400358 CP N 1 Dickenson Down Home Market at Flemingtown STP 1080 The Lake Rd Clintwood

VAG400364 MC CP Y 2 Dickenson Adkins Rodney & Barbara Residence STP 416 Steinman Circle Clinchco

VAG400367 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Sparks Paula Residences STP 140 Tagalong Ln North Tazewell

VAG400371 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Counts Kevin J Residence STP 8897 Dante Mountain Rd Dante

VAG400372 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Mullins Bobby R. Residence STP 990 Priest Fork Rd Bee

VAG400378 X O & M CP Y 1 Dickenson Sutherland Gaynell Residence STP 1566 Dickenson Hwy Baden

VAG400384 O & M CP Y 1 Tazewell Hale Samuel D. Residence STP 1839 Middle Creek Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400385 MC CP Y 2 Tazewell Bandy Jennifer Residence STP 243 Old Mill Road Cedar Bluff

VAG400388 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Barton Charlie Ayers Residence STP 1719 Crooked Branch Rd Birchleaf

VAG400391 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Hensley Elsie Residence STP 8261 Hurley Rd Hurley

VAG400397 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan O’Neill Larry D and Rebecca S Residence STP1119 Country Meadows Rd Breaks

VAG400398 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Newsome Dorothy Residence STP 1087 Old Spring Rd Haysi

VAG400401 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Stinson Lena F Residences STP State Route 67 Richlands

VAG400402 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Edwards Gaylord Residence STP 482 Road Branch Rd Clinchco

VAG400403 O & M CP N 1 Buchanan Brown David Residences STP 8371 Hurley Rd Hurley

VAG400404 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Hurley Bobby and Hurst Sherry Residence STP1700 Poplar Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400405 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Deel Sherry Residence STP State Rte 627 Buchanan Co

VAG400407 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Stanley Bill Residence STP State Route 629, Brush Creek Clintwood

VAG400408 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Ramey Roger R Residence STP 3207 Jerrys Branch Clintwood

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400409 O & M CP Y 1 Dickenson Pigott Penny Residence STP 776 Buffalo Creek Rd Nora

VAG400411 O & M CP Y 1 Russell Duty Margaret Residence STP 275 Willis Chapel Circle Lebanon

VAG400412 CP Y 1 Buchanan Coleman Mary M Residence STP State Route 627 Vansant

VAG400413 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Matney Construction Company Shop STP 4219 Dismal Rd Vansant

VAG400414 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Deel Walter and Janice F Residence STP 4135 Old Greenbriar Rd Haysi

VAG400421 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Gearhart William C. Residences STP 174 Wild Rose Drive Raven

VAG400422 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Honaker Frankie Laine Residence STP 838 Crab Orchard Rd Tazewell

VAG400425 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Deel Tony Residences STP 243 Pickett Rd Bee

VAG400428 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Shields Tamara Residence STP 6134 Lick Creek Rd Birchleaf

VAG400434 MC CP Y 1 Russell Dye Ronnie K Residence STP 797 Truel Brown Rd Swords Creek

VAG400435 O & M CP N 1 Tazewell Alexander UM Church and Residence STP Intersection of Routes 16 and 753 Bishop

VAG400436 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Hall Lila Residence STP 385 Owens Branch Haysi

VAG400443 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Elswick Nannie M Residence STP 146 Three Rd Richlands

VAG400444 MC CP Y 1 Russell Perkins Jimmy E Residence STP 799 Long Branch Rd Swords Creek

VAG400445 O&M CP N 1 Buchanan Pilgrims Knob Community Park STP State Route 638 Pilgrims Knob

VAG400447 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Willowbrook Country Club State Route 609 Breaks

VAG400452 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Sutherland Terry Residence STP 3307 Rock Lick Rd Haysi

VAG400456 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Shore Stop 452 STP US Hwy 460 Springville

VAG400458 MC CP Y 2 Dickenson Brett Sykes Residence STP State Route 80 Birchleaf

VAG400460 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Duty Jerry Residence STP State Route 641 Bishop

VAG400461 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Street and Collier Residences STP 2910 Ravens Nest Branch Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400461 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Street and Collier Residences STP 2886 Ravens Nest Branch Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400463 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Baker Dennis and Eugenia Residences STP 790 Hospital Dr Clintwood

VAG400465 MC CP N 1 Buchanan R & J Properties STP Pheasant Run Rd Grundy

VAG400476 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Deel Jerry and Arlene Residence STP 28131 Dickenson Hwy Haysi

VAG400479 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Alpha & Omega Service and Repair 9288 Dickenson Hwy Clintwood

VAG400480 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Childress Rosemarie Berlin Residence STP 1908 Jerrys Branch Clintwood

VAG400482 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Hale Joseph Residence STP 388 Horse Shoe Rd Coeburn

VAG400483 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Adams Charles M Residence STP 1600 Indian Creek Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400484 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Edwards Wade and Jennifer Residence STP1937 Loop Rd Falls Mills

VAG400487 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Edwards Kathy Residence STP 327 Jerrys Br Clintwood

VAG400490 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Bryant Ike Residences STP 822 Bear Pen Creek Clintwood

VAG400492 MC CP N 1 Russell Griffith Glenn Residences STP State Route 635 Swords Creek

VAG400493 NB CP Y 1 Russell Dye Douglas E and Judy Residence SFH STPState Route 67 Swords Creek

VAG400498 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Scyphers James and Delores Residence STP142 Low Rd Richlands

VAG400499 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Byrd Lisa Residence STP 198 Lark Lane Bluefield

VAG400500 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Smith Dorothy Residence STP 179 Auburn Drive Bluefield

VAG400501 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Coleman Jeffery and Rebecca Residences STP107 Jim Lane Cedar Bluff

VAG400502 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Hurley Heights I - Lots A, 1, & 2 STP St Rte 650 Roseanne

VAG400504 MC CP N 1 Russell Sarah, Sana, & Hena, LLC STP US 19 and St Rte 676 Hansonville

VAG400511 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Shreve Mark Residence STP 256 Creeper Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400512 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Branham Stearl Residence STP State Rte 83 Clinchco

VAG400513 NB CP Y 1 Russell Sutherland Natasha Residence STP 268 Perkins Hollow Rd Swords Creek

roma [fund ose] eno rane Pty An 9 faces] [onm [er] —v | + | btomn pa Ponyfacom SP Free cer hes frcnonr[ [0am [er] y | + | ramet [onyntonntesines st frst = oo I Cs = fasioona] | me [er] | + [eer ey Coan conan snr? fet Ova havo finns] we [er] y+ [eaten lostaracinnFemeesTe fissonGeemarne favs Ce AC = facronza| [we [oe] vy [+ | tent four Fn ane Reset? [Gun mee = Kaswoae] [we [er] 0 [+ [bane estes SP faraesne be faswoae] [me [er] —v | + [oom Sinus Tone Rennes? potter = faseose] [me [er] —y [+ | ramet [etme khenoee ste fa tate = Racome| [me [or] y+ | bao pana? [nsoroe been = Cn Cd = fama] [we [er] v1 | tame Pome iy Ranovest? eg Ss = fxcionss| [caw [or] | + | ates Jrmaion Goran Poste momen Pein A See ome = faswoez] [we [er] v [+ [oaonnn unwary acorSTP i Rea ur han frsnoce| [me [er] || rae [tw ine shoo = foosace| [me [er] —y| 2 [ona tne neiocs kom = Racers] [me [or] 1 | + [bom tr dips esenarP)rt or = faces] [we [er] 0 [+ [eon a repo SP Pic nf way fasenore] | me [er] —v | + [bare eran Ame leas? ister ey = fmosare| [me _[er] 1 | + [ecu pi cones sense anew ee occuntey = faceno| [ue [oo] | + | ama [onan Ramat bom tase? ft re bora = faciomia| [we [or] | + | oan nionpnecnee sth ‘(tne te enn Faces] [me [or] y+ | teat ase cursus st? onc Guo esr Kase] [me [er] y+ | teat [evo vat nt eens SHIT sa rae fasinowr| | ne [er] y+ [oatome |smoetanytasenest? ero = fsnowe] [me [er] 0 | + [oom rte isnt izeerreten = tacoma] [vue [or] ew [1 | twat foun camtasnenst fentaomts 5 A ers one fcinose] [me [er] y [+ | teat [Stes eran Des Ree sf wr fee facense| [ue [or] y [9 | te fet ese sP fess bose Rawmro| [we [or] y [+ | tener fmnostyReunes sth eam = Races] [me [or] [| tea [eran ey Ramesses esr faceme| [me [or] y [1 | ose fionenentionee ST? tenants = CC ES ees Go

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400515 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Buchanan County Animal Shelter STP 1991 Dog Pound Rd Grundy

VAG400516 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Newberry Freddie Residences STP 1025 Cranesnest Rd Vansant

VAG400521 MC CP Y 1 Russell Harris Jennifer Residence STP 413 Ball Hollow Rd Honaker

VAG400522 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Phipps Harry D Residence STP 398 Phipps Rd Bluefield

VAG400525 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Wynn Ernest W Residence STP 1716 Adria Rd North Tazewell

VAG400532 O & M CP N 1 Dickenson Vanover Apartments STP 3442 Coeburn Rd Clintwood

VAG400535 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Rasnake George Residence STP 1481 Priest Fork Rd Bee

VAG400537 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Woodall Mary Residence STP 2333 Grassy Spur Rd Bandy

VAG400538 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Phipps Thomas E Residence STP St Rt 689 Clintwood

VAG400539 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Owens Donald Residence STP 498 Arrington Dr Haysi

VAG400540 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Nelson Rodney Residence STP 1952 Bandy Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400542 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Webb Nathan Residence STP 559 Ascue Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400545 CP Y 1 Buchanan McCoy Cora Residence SFH STP St Rt 691 Big Rock

VAG400546 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Ice Kevin Residence STP 111 Branch Rd Pounding Mill

VAG400547 x MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Young Robert Residence SFH STP 2656 Dyers Chapel Rd Clinchco

VAG400549 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Duty Kermit Residence STP 2584 Hobbs Branch Rd Grundy

VAG400550 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Cline Dalis and Crystal Residence STP 1880 Upper Elk Creek Hurley

VAG400551 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Ball Bobby and Susan Residence STP 1050 Ascue Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400553 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Meade Business and Residence STP 2368 Crab Orchard Rd Tazewell

VAG400557 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Cardinal Development Inc STP 1 Intersection State Rte 83 and 674 Grundy

VAG400558 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Cardinal Development Inc STP 2 Intersection State Rte 83 and 674 Grundy

VAG400559 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Matney Shirley Residence STP 1332 Old Guesses Fork Rd Hurley

VAG400561 X MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Taylor Teresa Residence STP 6555 Pounding Mill Branch Rd Pounding Mill

VAG400563 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Smith Dennis W Residences STP 420 Mill Creek Raven

VAG400565 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Hurley Community Development STP 3206 Lesters Fork Road Hurley

VAG400567 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Boyd Residences STP 7905 Lovers Gap Road Vansant

VAG400568 X MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Griffith Frank J Residence STP 212 Low Rd Richlands

VAG400569 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Smith Mark W Residence STP 161 Cannal St Richlands

VAG400571 MC CP N 1 Tazewell McFarland Residences and Shop STP 2011 Clearfork Rd Tazewell

VAG400573 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Keen Robert Charles Residence STP 2582 Old KY Turnpike Rd Raven

VAG400575 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Horn Sherry Residence STP 326 Hagy St Pounding Mill

VAG400578 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Cantrell Jared and Alyssa Residence STP 1024 Green Shadows Rd Breaks

VAG400580 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Mullins Billie N Residence STP 310 Rakes Ridge Rd Birchleaf

VAG400583 O & M CP N 1 Tazewell Meeks Michael Residences STP 1636 Loop Rd Falls Mills

VAG400586 MC CP N 1 Russell Clinch River Hemp Company LLC STP 3922 US Hwy 19 Lebanon

VAG400587 MC CP N 1 Russell Johnson Jennifer Dye Residences STP 523 Strouth Creek Swords Creek

VAG400588 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Mullins Kimberly Residence STP 258 Cornerstone Trailer Park Coeburn

VAG400590 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Williamson Connie Residences STP 1055 Hunts Fork Road Hurley

VAG400597 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Thompson Larry J & Connie L Residences STP315 Shrader Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400604 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy Rita Residence STP 2964 Straight Fork Rd Grundy

VAG400605 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Smith Tommy A Residence STP 798 Willow Springs Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400606 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell TePoel Louis Residence STP 555 Peery Addition Rd Tazewell

VAG400608 MC CP N 1 Russell Howe Donna Residences STP 7377 Clinch Mountain Rd Lebanon

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [vacaoosts| | wo [or] w | + | eucnanan [aucnanan County Animal sheter STP [1901 00g Pound Ra Jenny [vacaooste| | wc [or| w | + | eocnanan Wewbony Fedde Residences STP [1025 GraneenesiR@ Jansant [vacacosar| | wc [or] v | + | Risser [Hart Jennter Residence ST [9 Bar rotow Ra onaner [vasaoosze| | me _[om] vy _| 1 | tazewor [nore Hany o Resonce STP bse Prensa lowetes jraceooses | | me [op] vy | 1 | Tazowar [yan tment w Resitence STP frre ada Ra ore Tazewe jvacsoosse] | oam [cp| _n | + | ecenson Vanover Apanments STP oe Costu Ra [mtn [vacaoosas| | mo [or] v | 1 | oitenson [Rasnate Gouge Restence SP ser Pres Fon Re lose [vacacosar| [na [or] | 1+ | Tawa |Woodat nary Reson STP 0 Grasny Spr lear [vasaoossa | | wo [oe] v | 1 | otonson [nope thomas E Restore STP [sree [cmtoon [vacaoosse] | mc [oP] v _| + | ortenon [ovens ona Restence STP [ae arington Br eva fraceooseo] | we [op| vy | 1 | tazowat eon Rodney Resdence STP fsa any Re [ear Bua jvaceoosea] | mo [or| vy | + | tazowat [eto nathan Residence STP ise accu Ra [ear ou [vacaooses Ge] ¥| 1 | eesrenan[iccay Gor Ressence SFHSTP Jsrvenr joerc [vacaoosee| [wo [or] v | 1 | Tazowet [cokevn Reson STP fi Branch Re Fesndng Mi [vacaoosar|x | wo [cP] vy | 1 | cionson founp ober Residence SFHSTP [2656 Dyers Chapels lemenco [vasaoosss |} | me _[ cm] v _| 1 | evchanan [ou KomiResdence STP ase Hobbs rane Ra [evney fvaceoosso] | me [or] vy | + | auenanan [oie Dats and GyatalRestence STP [1880 Umer Ek Greek ey fraceoossr| | mo [cr | vy | + | Tacowot [aateobby and Susan Resnce STP [1080 Ascve Rd [ear ou [vacaoossa] [| mo [or] w | 1+ | Tazowetieadeaucness and Resdonce STP [206 Grab Orchard Re Hacewet [vacaoossr| | wo [or] w | + | euchaan [GardnalOevetpmen ine STP 1 nection State Raa ander _[Gnuny [vacaoosse| | wo [or] wn | 1 | excnanan |CarinalOeveupmentine STP [nersectn Sate Riven anae74 [ony jvaseoosse] | mo [cr] | + | @vchanan ate Shinty Restonce STP fas2 Ou Guess Fon Re ray [vacaoossr|K| me [or] v | + | tazewen [favor Terese Residence STP [s85Pounsngerencn Ra [Pounding ma jvaceoossa] [mo [cr| vy | + | tacewar [aman denna w Restences STP [20 Greek Jraven [vacsoosss[ [me [cen | 1 | euenanan [RiteyComminiy Oeveopment STP [5206 ese Fok Rosa lay [vacaooser| [wo [or] w | 1 | euchanan [Boyd Resences STP 05 Lovers Gap Rose [ansant [vacaoosse|X| we [or] vy | + | taowen [Gann Francs Resdence STP fe2t0wea Renae [vacaooseo| [mc [op] v | + | tazewen [smi nonw Resuence STP fst Gamat st pana Fvacaoosra | we [om] wn | 1 | tarouer |icrarandReslenoes ana ShopStP [2017 Oeafon Ra Hazewet fvacaoosral | na [op] y | 1 | auchanan eon Rober Gnaes Resence STP [asa OW KY Tampa Ra reve [vacaoosrs| | wo [or] v | 1 | tazowan [Hom snenyRestence STP 26 Heay st Fesndng Mi [vacacosre] | wo [or] v | + | eochanan [Cantor Jared and Asse Restence STP [1024 Gren Shadows Re = [vacaooseo] | mc [cr] v | + | ortonson jus Be wRessonce STP 10 Rakes Rage Ra lorcnear [vacaooses] | oam [cP] n | + | Tazewen Meck MchaetResuencas STP 636 Loop Ra Fase jraceooses| | me [op] w | + | Russet cinanRvertemp Conpanyllcst —[as22uS Hay 10 letanon fraceooser| | me _[op| _w | + | Russet [onnson Jenner Gye Restences STP _[s29 Sou Creek evcrdsCreek [vacaoosee| | mo [or] v | + | oxtenson tins Kbery Residence STP se comersione Tater Pak [Coabum [vacaoosso] | wo [or] w | + | euchanan [watson one Resdences STP [1055 Huns For Road lay [vacacossr| | mc [or] w | 1 | tazewen [Tompson anyJ& conne L Restences S[315 Strader [evar ou [vasaoosae | [me _[om] | 1 | eucnanan [Stay Rea Residence STP sce Sain FoncRa [evney fraceoosos | | me [or] _w | 1 | Tarowat |smanommyA Residence STP se wnow Springs Re [evar Bua fraceoosos| | mo [or] vy | + | Tacowat [TePcelLous Restence STP sss Peery Accton Re Facewet [vacaoosce] [wo [or] w | + | mussen [Howe Oona Resdencos STP far” cinen nian Ra letenen

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400609 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Addison Richard L Residence STP St Rte 627 Tazewell

VAG400610 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Superior Fabrication Group STP 1680 Breaks Park Rd Haysi

VAG400611 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Steele Michael Residences STP 184 Charlie Ln Clintwood

VAG400613 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Poplar Gap Gymnasium STP Park Rd Poplar Gap

VAG400614 MC CP N 1 Russell Deskins Tessa Residences STP 43 Aspen Court Hoanker

VAG400619 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Harman Memorial Baptist Church 4321 Bull Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400622 O & M CP N 1 Russell Dye Jerry W Residences STP 2191 Pine Creek Rd Swords Creek

VAG400625 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Hensley Angie and Jessie Residences STP Red Oak Ridge Rd Castlewood

VAG400626 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Hurley Family Health Center 10279 Hurley Rd Hurley

VAG400627 MC CP Y 1 Russell Puckett John H Residence STP 544 Mew Rd Dungannon

VAG400628 MC CP N 1 Russell Russell County Head Start Center 7341 Swords Creek Rd Swords Creek

VAG400629 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Stevens Patsy Crumb Residence STP 10132 Hurley Rd Hurley

VAG400634 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Bevins James and Banna Residence STP 1670 Elkins Branch Road Grundy

VAG400635 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan MCClanahan Kaitlyn Residence STP 1998 Pounding Mill Rd Hurley

VAG400637 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Bandy Diana Residences STP 684 Johnson’s Branch Road Bandy

VAG400638 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Lewis McKinley Residence STP 750 Ascue Rd Pounding Mill

VAG400639 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Hackney Ronney Residence STP 147 Blankenship Lane Haysi

VAG400643 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy Christopher and Rita Residence STP 1091 Sun Branch Rd Grundy

VAG400644 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Moore Tommy R Land and Cattle Company STP14276 Governor GC Peery Hwy Pounding Mill

VAG400646 CP Y 1 Russell Daughtery DeAnna Residence STP US 19 Hansonville

VAG400647 CP N 1 Russell Hill Bernard Residences STP 910 & 922 Maple Gap Rd Swords Creek

VAG400648 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Hall Barbara Residences STP 1033 Guesses Fork Road Hurley

VAG400655 CP N 1 Tazewell Barnett George Residences STP 3230 Bandy Rd Bandy

VAG400657 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Whisenhunt Michael Residences STP 2577 Bad Ridge Rd Coeburn

VAG400658 O & M CP Y 1 Buchanan Matney Nancy Residence STP 4112 Old Guesses Fork Rd Hurley

VAG400660 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Hill Edward D Residence STP 220 McGraw Hill Rd North Tazewell

VAG400661 x NB CP Y 1 Russell Salyer Roger K and Mary Residence STP St Rt 679 Russell Co

VAG400662 O&M CP N 2 Tazewell Easy Stop STP 18291 G C Perry Hwy Pounding Mill

VAG400663 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Smith Loyal R and Betty Residence STP 5712 Deskins Rd Vansant

VAG400664 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Dotson Sherry Lynn Residence STP 2192 Stone Coal Rd Grundy

VAG400665 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Whitt Eric Residence STP 2224 Wittens Mill Rd North Tazewell

VAG400668 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy Junior B Residence STP 1031 Smith Branch Rd Grundy

VAG400673 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Justus Hazel Residences STP 4939 Old Lester Fork Rd Grundy

VAG400675 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Hill William F Residence STP St Rte 607 Dickenson County

VAG400677 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Dickenson Fannie Residence STP St Rte 643 Tazewell County

VAG400678 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Carl L Harman Apartment STP 10055 Garden Creek Rd Oakwood

VAG400679 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Justus Allan and Cheryl Residences STP 4897 Lester’s Fork Rd Grundy

VAG400680 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Rigsby Rachel Residence STP 3838 Bull Creek Rd Maxie

VAG400681 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Williams Scotty Residence STP 6506 Home Creek Rd Big Rock

VAG400682 CP Y 1 Buchanan Marshall Ida Matney Residence STP 1056 Old Home Creek Rd Rowe

VAG400684 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Deel Robin Residence STP 2929 Greenbrier Rd Haysi

VAG400686 NB CP N 1 Buchanan Boyd-Sexton Residences STP 1008 Laguna Rd Grundy

roma [fund ose] eno rane Pty An 9 fcweee] [ve [er] v1 | tamer fate inont core oF are fea frowene| [me [er] 1 | + [ocenen pearrasiain Goer sara hen fcenes| | we [er] 0 | + [barn one eetetonesst? itch in = fain] [me [er] [+ [earn cap enanP Pe Poor Racer] [ove [oo] w+ | twat festa tansneesth [meron = PC Ce ear fmowonse| [onm [er] 0 | + amet [ommnnedvesrste Pe Gan cso fsene| [me [er] 1+ [teem sy tg se air [oO Re =— fence] [me [er] w+ [ arn ry Fnn com ervey hey facsowar| [we [er] y [+ | rise renin s1p rte = A Se hey Fsseess] [we [or] —y | + [ aetrn|s ioe on ue Rares STP oes ene forme faces] [we [er] v | + [eon iccunnncnn entre iP [8 Pega hy foosnsr| [me [er] | + | raat fons Ommrsrassir [ores Boek foi fcsnase] we [er] y [+ | tae ewe Renee ste fom na Pea facia] [we [or] | + | acum [cy ccpe ain eee Sieh ewe fine [me [or] | + | Tea eTny Rttn opay {8 Greer GS Paya cine cw [1 | rasa faeernestoee SF ee a fssnwse] | me [er] [+ [earn atta Reseeas sve usm Fonrent ory faooes I nar faowee7| [we [oo] | + | oan fnsnnun tenes STP [TT one = front] onm [or] y | + [eaten peeves a1? ‘208 Geen faseeee] [ve [or] v | + | teat teomaD acomest? fuoncoew rhe fe Tart rn = facisa| [me [or] | + | tan fnensterytpreninen STP rm co oa Kseeees] [we [er] v [+ | tema fm icons TP ore fe Tamer fre [veer] y+ [eat yer cen oh [ih rr way fines] [ne [er] | + [per [ams rnrteeeses? fatsonteue rine fowy fcsnere] [ve [er] y+ [atom in en sear acento facwer| [me [or] y [+ | tet framers fouees SP eo Feet oy facia [we [or] 0 | + | acteanfertnanenagnenate ——iscaaniGaarke fms Fswone] [me [or] [+ [earn fe Chey tnr SP Te an ay frown [me [er] y+ [estan ay Raaeieninn ve oo Guts bev finer [me [er] y+ [eer ans Seay fase a1? [one Gn owe cine ce] 7] + | err feat eters Pfs cron tense Nd ea fewer] [ve [er] 0 | + [aataae ponents [re apna ema

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400688 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Clevinger Ronald Residence STP 14772 Hurley Rd Hurley

VAG400691 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Cole Greg and Lynn Residence SFH STP 1460 Green Acres St Richlands

VAG400692 NB CP Y 1 Russell Beavers Arthur and Patricia Residence STP 3137 Finney Rd Honaker

VAG400697 X MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Collins Gary Residence STP County Route 3005 Vansant

VAG400698 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Thompson Pal Residences STP 1077 Navigator Rd Harman

VAG400699 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Estep Joseph and Ruth Residences STP 1665 Hunts Fork Rd Hurley

VAG400702 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Mabe Ronnie Residence STP 426 Holy Rd Richlands

VAG400703 CP Y 1 Buchanan Ashby Rosetta McFarlane Residence STP 2226 Hurricane Creek Rd Vansant

VAG400704 X NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Layne John R Residence STP 8355 Hurley Rd Hurley

VAG400710 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Street Michael Residences STP 2732 Dry Fork Rd Buchanan Co

VAG400712 MC CP N 1 Buchanan McClain Darlene Residences STP 1095 Buford Dr Vansant

VAG400714 NB CP Y 1 Russell Chafin Randall L Residence SFH STP 2537 Carterton Rd Lebanon

VAG400716 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Dickenson County PSA - Haysi Residences STPSt Rte 80 Haysi

VAG400717 O&M CP N 1 Tazewell Tazewell County PSA - Neal Hollow STP 1 145 Hawkins Dr Falls Mills

VAG400718 O&M CP N 1 Tazewell Tazewell County PSA - Neal Hollow STP 2 205 Hawkins Dr Falls Mills

VAG400721 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Boyd John L Residence STP 1089 Country Meadows Rd Breaks

VAG400727 MC CP N 1 Buchanan VEDCO Holdings Inc Office STP 1793 Dry Fork Rd Vansant

VAG400728 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Ling Willard and Gusene Residence STP 1829 Mill Creek Rd Hurley

VAG400729 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Deel Teresa Residence STP 1144 Deadbolt Rd Vansant

VAG400730 NB CP N 2 Buchanan Whitewood Volunteer Fire Dept & Community Ctr STP16128 Dismal River Rd Whitewood

VAG400731 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Griffey Tabitha and Donald Residence STP 2188 Upper Mill Branch Rd Grundy

VAG400735 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Scott Randy and Sue Residence STP 2439 Slate Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400737 X CP Y 1 Buchanan Hensley Michael Shawn Residence STP 1335 Old Lesters Fork Rd Hurley

VAG400741 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Lowe Paul Residence STP 4348 Dry Fork Rd Buchanan Co

VAG400745 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Sparks Donald Residence STP 400 Middle Creek Rd Ringgold

VAG400749 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy Tony R Sr Residence STP 1017 Ray Stacy Rd Wolford

VAG400751 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Sutherland Mark Residence STP 3385 Rock Lick Rd Haysi

VAG400752 MC/O&M CP Y 1 Dickenson Keen Tammy Residence STP 664 Backbone Ridge Haysi

VAG400753 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson O’quin Ashley Residence STP 6121 Aily Rd Dante

VAG400754 NB CP Y 1 Russell Barnhart Lawrence Marvin Residence STP 2397 Corn Valley Rd Honaker

VAG400755 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan McCoy Teddy Residence STP 4127 Guesses Fork Rd Hurley

VAG400757 O&M CP N 1 Buchanan Looney’s Shop STP 2727 Upper Mill Branch Rd Grundy

VAG400758 CP Y 1 Buchanan Viars Deborah Jane Residence STP 2782 Hale Creek Rd Pilgrims Knob

VAG400759 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Ison Vanessa Residence STP 732 Jerrys Branch Clintwood

VAG400760 CP N 1 Tazewell Moseley Rory Residence and Shop STP 730 Willow Spring Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400761 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Ward Brian Residence STP 3179 Lovers Gap Rd Vansant

VAG400762 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Cline Robert E II Residence STP 1031 Brown Rd Roseann

VAG400763 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Maloyed Betty Rhea Residence STP 553 Mt Spring Rd Tannersville

VAG400764 NB CP Y 1 Russell Gullett Eddie E and Twilia Y Residence SFH STP58 Rebel Dr St. Paul

VAG400765 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Billips Carl Rex Jr and Paula Residence STP9915 Mud Fork Rd Bluefield

VAG400767 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Brown Jimmy and Brigette Residence STP 1753 Green Mountain Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400768 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Belcher Linda Residence STP St Rte 643 Hurley

VAG400769 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Fleming Noah Doug Residence STP 1581 Little Lick Hollow Haysi

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [vacaoosse] | ne [or] v | + | eucnanan [Ctunger Rona Reskence STP fa772 Huey a jaey [vacaoosst| [mc [or] v | 1 | Tazowen [Gow Greg and Lyon esience SFH STP [1400 Green Aces S = [vacaoossa] | wo [or] v | + | Risser [beaver anturand Pavia Restence STP|D197 Frney Re loaner [vacoossr[X | we [cP] | 1 | evcnanan [Cots Gay Resaenee STP [county Rete 3005 ansant jvaceoosee | | me [or _w | + | auenanan [rompeon Pal Residences St for” Navigator karan [vaceoosse] [we [cP] 6 | 1+ | auenanan [esp Joseph and Rum Restenes STP [185 Hnt FoncRe lay [vacaoorea| | wo [op| v | + | Tazevat! [Mabe Ronnie Residence ST [estoy Re — [vacaoarea ce] ¥| 1 | erchanan [ashoy Rossa ncrarane Resdence STP [2228 Hurzane Creek Ra [ansant [vacaooroe|X| ne [or] vy _| 1 | eucnanan [layne son R Resdence STP [e355 huey Ra nae [vacsoors0 eo frs2 Ov Fo Re loveranan co jraceoorie] | me [op| _w | + | suenanan |vccian Danone Resdnces STP fos autor br Haneant jraceoorse] [we [or] vy | + | russot [onatnRandat Resdance sen sve [osa7 Canenon Ra lecenen [vacacarse| | na [or] _w | 1 | oitenaon [Okenson Cauny PSA Haya Residences {51 Ri 0 le [vacaoors7| | om [cP] w | + | Tazewon [Tarowet CounlyPSA-NealHolow STP [145 Hawkins Or Fats as [vacaoorse| | oam [oP] _w | 1+ | Tazewet[Tarewet GouniyPSA-NeaiHolow STP2 [205 Hawkins Or Fate ae [vacaoorar| | na [or] v | + | euchanan [Boyd Jann Residence STP 066 County Meadows Ra = |vacaoorar| | wo [or] w | + | eocnanan [YEDCO Hokings nc Ofice STP 700 ory Fon Ra [ansant [vacaoorae| | ne _[ or] v | + | eocnanan [ingwiaa and Gusene Residence STP 1029, Grok Ro leaner [vacaoorze| [ne [ cP] vy _| 1 | evcnanan [beet teresa Resuence STP 144 Deadwons ansant fraceoorao] | we [P| » | @ | suenanan jntewood Vourteer Fre Dept & Conmunt 6128 Dima River Ra co [vaceoorar[ [ne [or | vy | + | auenanan [ontey Tene nd Dons Ressence STP [2166 Upper Mil ranch Re lewnay [vacaooras| | ne [or] v | + | eucnanan [scot Randy and Sue Resdence STP [2430 Sate Greet Ra lownay [vacaoorar |X | ¥| 1 | ercnanan |Hensteynichaol shawn Restence STP [1906 Ot Lester For Re lhaey [vacaoorar| [wo [or] vy | 1 | evcnanan [lowe Pot Residence STP [40 Oy For Re loveranan Co [vassoores| | wo [ce] v | 1 | Tesewoi spans DonidResdence STP [0 ae Creek Ra [Reaves jraceooree] | ne [or] vy | + | auenanan [stay tony R SrRestence STP for Ray Stays wore jraceoorsi| | we [or | vy | + | ecenson [sunerand Mark Resnce STP ses Rook uk Ra ea [vacoarsa| [weroan| cP] | 1+ | Oktenson [keen Tammy Restenca STP eee Backbone Rage lea [vacaoorsa] | na[ or] v | 1 | oitenson [OqunAshiey Residence STP ravine Joan [vacaoorse| | wo _[or| vy | + | Risser [bomnantawrence navn Restonce STP [2397 Com Vatey Re onaner Jvasaoorss | | we [cm] v| 1 | evchanan fecoy Teds Restonce SP [27 Guesses Fou Ra ley jvaceoors7] | oam [op] _w | + | suenanan [toons shop St var Urperh Branch Re [ewnay fraceoorse ce] y | 1 | excnanan [Vir Detran Jane Resa STP [aaa Hale Creek Ra = [vacaoorse| | na[or| v | 1 | oitenson [son vanessa Residence STP 2 ery ranch [nto [vacaoorea| ce] Ww _| 1 | Texowat [ioseey Rory Residence and Shop STP [730 Who Spina Rd [evar ou [vacaoorer| | we [or] vy | + | eocnanan [worsen Ressonoe STP 79 Lover Gap Ra [ansant [vacaoorsa| | ne [oP] v | 1 | evcnanan [eine Rober EW Residence STP foot Brom Ra Roseann fraceoorea] | we [op] vy | + | Tazowar |vaoyea ety nea Restence STP _[ss9neSpmng Rd Fenner jvaceooree] [we [or| vy | + | russet [outer Eade © and Twa vRestence SF [59 Rebel Or leva [vacaoores| | na [or] v | + | Tazevat [anne Gar Rexirand Pada Resdnce STH015 Mud Fm Ra louetee [vacacorer| [na [or] v _| + | Tazewen [tron dmmy and Grgete Resonce STP [1759 Gren Moura Ra [evar ou [vacaooree| | no [or] v | + | eocnanan [bother nda Ressonoe STP rie on ray [vacaoores| [ne _[oP| v | + | Otten [reming Noah Ooug Reston STP [1501 Lie Lek Holow ea

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400770 CP N 1 Buchanan Nations Richard Residences STP 7839 Bull Creek Rd Buchanan

VAG400772 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy Gary and Lisa Residence STP 1016 Day Lily Dr Grundy

VAG400779 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Belcher Linda Residence STP - Harman 1556 Belcher Fork Rd Harman

VAG400780 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Altizer Charlie Residence STP 2313 Happy Hollow Rd Breaks

VAG400781 NB CP N 1 Tazewell Horne Judy C Residences STP 927 Willow Springs Cedar Bluff

VAG400782 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Bowman James and Geraldine Residence STP2192 Red Dirt Rd Leemaster

VAG400785 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Rose Richard W and Pamela Residence STP2292 Coeburn Rd Clintwood

VAG400791 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Wimmer Tammy V. Horton Residence STP 175 Addison Road Cedar Bluff

VAG400794 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Kiser Jason Residence STP 185 Stiltner Dr Cedar Bluff

VAG400795 NB CP Y 1 Russell Smith Bertha Residence STP Cleveland Rd Cleveland

VAG400797 NB CP Y 1 Russell Phillips Annie Gail Residence STP 3658 Dante Road Castlewood

VAG400801 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Yates Matthew and Melanie Residence STP 5242 Bull Creek Rd Harman

VAG400802 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Flannagan Recreation Park STP 379 Hollow Place Rd Dickenson Co

VAG400805 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Counts Jimmy Residence STP 516 Dark Hollow Rd Haysi

VAG400806 CP N 1 Tazewell Dunford Denise C Residences STP 350 Addison Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400807 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Miller Harold L Residence STP 448 Bailey Switch Rd Bluefield

VAG400808 NB CP Y 1 Russell Collins Justin Residence STP 1059 Mew Rd Castlewood

VAG400809 x NB CP N 1 Buchanan Photo Classics Inc STP 16554 Riverside Dr Oakwood

VAG400810 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Thornsberry Ian Residence STP 1245 Peeled Poplar Rd Grundy

VAG400812 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Sexton Jonathan Residences STP 1048 Sweet Cherry Rd Grundy

VAG400813 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Font John H Residences STP 460/8 Burkes Garden Tazewell

VAG400814 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Edwards Edmund and Linda Residence STP1059 Baker Ridge Rd Clintwood

VAG400825 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Rife James Residence STP 1143 Lower Fork Road Pilgrim Knob

VAG400826 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Hill Conrad Residence STP 1052 Gardina Way Bee

VAG400830 NB CP N 1 Buchanan Paul’s Repair Shop STP 2125 Home Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400837 x NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Neece Vera Residence STP 191 Paridise Ally Trammel

VAG400838 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Rose Kenneth & Joyce Residence STP 5680 Frying Pan Creek Road Birchleaf

VAG400839 CP Y 1 Dickenson Deel Arlene Rental Property STP 26016 Dickenson Hwy Haysi

VAG400844 NB CP Y 1 Russell Atwell Robert Jr Residence STP US 19 Russell County

VAG400845 NB CP Y 1 Russell Rasnick Daryl Residence STP 137 Trout Farm Rd Castlewood

VAG400846 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Swiney Gary and Amy Residence STP 1674 Doubling Fields Road Maxie

VAG400847 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Kidd Roba D Kidd Residence STP 3317 Wrights Valley Rd Bluefield

VAG400849 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Hess Betty Residence STP 3174 Big Branch Rd Vansant

VAG400850 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Thomas Randy Residences STP 2583 Bartlick Rd Haysi

VAG400851 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Stacey Elmer Residence STP 2750 Virginia Ave Bluefield

VAG400852 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson O’Quinn Teddy Residence STP 1045 Medley Dr Bee

VAG400853 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Bowman George Jr Residence STP 626 Peery Addition Rd Tazewell

VAG400854 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Gibson Jacquline Residence STP 1029 Dogwood Dr. Hurley

VAG400859 NB CP N 1 Tazewell Bobby’s Towing Inc STP 2095 Wrights Valley Rd Bluefield

VAG400861 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Sparks Dallas and Dori Residence & Office STP897 Bailey Switch Road Bluefield

VAG400862 NB CP Y 1 Russell Wilson Michael Scott Residence STP 481 McFarlane Ln Rosedale

VAG400863 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Stanley Bradley and Allison Residence STP 138 Auty’s Ln Haysi

VAG400864 MC CP N 1 Russell Advance Diagnostics Inc 1708 US Hwy 19 Lebanon

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400865 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Justus Brandon J and Amanda D Residence STP1434 Squire Branch Rd Grundy

VAG400866 NB CP Y 1 Russell Owens Bill Residence STP 163 Grace Ln Rosedale

VAG400870 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Owens Betty Residence STP 914 Steves Branch Bee

VAG400871 CP Y 1 Dickenson Robinson James T Residence STP St Rte 72 Dickenson Co

VAG400872 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Asbury Heather Residence STP 1400 Six Farm Rd Tazewell

VAG400873 MC CP N 1 Russell Davis Frank and Hurd Dewey Residences STPSt Rte 683 Russell County

VAG400876 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Mullins Laura Beth Residence STP 1238 Crabtree Hollow Rd Clintwood

VAG400884 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy Brian Residence STP 1098 Gent Branch Rd Vansant

VAG400887 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Stevenson Janice and Ronnie Residence STP1880 Bandy Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400888 NB CP N 1 Buchanan Smith David Residences STP 1400 Fox Farm Rd Hurley

VAG400889 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Mullins Bradley and April Residence STP St Rte 632 Dickenson County

VAG400890 MC CP Y 1 Dickenson Heaton Tunnia Residence STP 114 Rattlesnake Rd. Dante

VAG400891 NB CP N 1 Buchanan Hale Rita Carol Ball Residences STP 1100 Spring Pond Rd Honaker

VAG400892 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Hale Julie Marie Residence STP 10472 Dante Mtn Rd Dante

VAG400893 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Gulley Tauna Residence STP 1910 Brush Creek Rd Clintwood

VAG400894 MC CP N 1 Buchanan May Karla Residences STP 1120 Typhoon Rd Grundy

VAG400896 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Cranesnest Trailhead STP St Rte 83 Dickenson County

VAG400897 NB CP Y 2 Tazewell McGlothlin James E and Michael M Res STPUS 19/460 Tazewell County

VAG400898 NB CP N 1 Buchanan Justice Georgie and Emmie Jean Residences STP675 Brushy Fork Rd Buchanan County

VAG400899 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Miller Rosemarie Residence STP 5796 Slate Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400900 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Miner Donna and Peak Stephen T Residence STP2404 Kents Ridge Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG400901 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Boyd Jerlene Residence STP 1073 Clanton Rd Grundy

VAG400902 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Burke Danny Residence STP 4420 Burkes Garden Rd Tazewell

VAG400903 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Wesley McCownan Residence STP 600 Dyers Chapel Rd Clinchco

VAG400905 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Mackey Sylvia E and Richard Residence STP301 Corps Lower Twin Ln Haysi

VAG400906 NB CP N 1 Buchanan Justus Jennie and Blankenship Tim Residences STP1393 and 1409 Brushy Fork Rd Buchanan County

VAG400907 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Fleming Tara Residence STP 252 Willow Ln Clintwood

VAG400908 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Viers Shad Residence STP 1026 Butterfly Hill Rd Haysi

VAG400911 NB CP N 2 Dickenson E & S Grocery STP 222 Sandlick Rd Birchleaf

VAG400912 O&M CP Y 1 Tazewell TCPSA Middle Creek Sewerage (C2) 131 Smith Dr Tazewell

VAG400913 CP Y 1 Tazewell TCPSA Middle Creek Sewerage (C3) 1020 Middle Creek Rd Tazewell

VAG400914 CP Y 1 Tazewell TCPSA Middle Creek Sewerage (C4) 1077 Middle Creek Rd Tazewell

VAG400916 O&M CP N 1 Tazewell TCPSA Middle Creek Sewerage (C6) 1298 Middle Creek Rd Tazewell

VAG400917 O&M CP N 1 Tazewell TCPSA Middle Creek Sewerage (C7) 150 George Rd Tazewell

VAG400918 O&M CP N 1 Tazewell TCPSA Middle Creek Sewerage (C8) 1565 Middle Creek Rd Tazewell

VAG400919 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Freeman Jenny Residence STP 1600 Upper Mill Branch Rd. Grundy

VAG400920 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Willis Danny and Shirley Residences STP 2916 Happy Hollow Road Breaks

VAG400921 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Jewell Coal and Coke Processing and Transfer Facility STP1034 Dismal River Rd Oakwood

VAG400922 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Meade Steven M and Deborah A Residence STP2765 Crab Orchard Rd Tazewell

VAG400924 CP Y 1 Dickenson Owens Heather Residence STP 3498 Indian Creek Rd Bee

VAG400926 CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacey William T and Louise Res STP 4781 Hurley Rd Hurley

roma [fund ose] eno rane Pty An 9 fssemes] [we [or] —v | + bon [na nn an ans Reto it Se Be a amar fasemee] [ve [er] v [+ | eat [om ontnee SP issceetn = fassnara] | ve [er] —v | + [oom loves tay fasonc st? [ets Beh be facie a bascnca fxcinwral [mw [or] vy] + | te foyer Renenste aan ran = fewer] [ne [or] 6 [+ | ema poss rnontire beefenancvsferees ita fsswers| [wo [or] —¥ [+ | me eve Fnontia Dey feoanas fare tan faces] [ve [er] —v | + [earn Sy bunRenenstP ios Gebel hese el ee esr Racwmo| [re [oe] v | + | an ate anyone mame? ves ern ta fasexee] [me [or] y+ [paomn foe imetesae st? eRommaio = fase] [ve [or] 1 + [ eer te tou toler TP me Pow a = fncennee] | ve [er] v | + [barn fe ashe tisone str zone nn = fines] [ve [er] y+ [osomm [oan Tama neveesst wtaneh Ova = cd Cd apna may facwmse| [re [oe] wv] + | tame [ones Tames stP meas erento Kacexee| [ve [er] —v [2 | tema svn ane € aia fe Sf od eat oy I can Gy facenewe| | ve [er] —v | + [eon rtcomnee ace 61? [0 Son Gut os fine] [ve [ew] y+ | terete Ooms en Suen TRenmcfs rene Rese ero fawn [me [or] y+ | actoae fue Renee stp ‘Gann omar facia [me [or] y | + | tent fteteny fanaa ste ‘(av eviescann fa [cso [ ne _[er] y | + [octene vesyhcowen tans sobs Cran emens Frowee| [ve _[er]| | + [earn [ant rie ation Te Rate ans Ona FRR fon aot fine] | ~ve [er] 1 [+ [arn [a erat tiie TR an Onc Fan fan ont facom7| [me [or] vy] + [oan free teatnanee stp swionin = ce ee yn = fasexne] ow [or] y+ | tear orentin Geni Sreae (Gaver Fe fine ce] ]+ | ten fenstae Cnt eve nor ec aa Raceree| [caw [oo] ew] + | te feestnar Cnt evans) ants Ges = fare [caw [oo] w [+ | ter [oranas Gut even?) Goma eee I ee fasexns [ve [or] y+ [peters [rooney Resnes ste [es ier bere forme frosoze| [ne [er] | + [eataan fas myanahey Reames ep hnon ——_feas fssnnar] [me [er] we [+ [ern [ne Conta Gi street 8 Dna ie a = pacer a be faces ce] [+ | rn tian Tce sth eh hy

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400927 X NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Dales Phyllis Residence STP 8269 Leemaster Dr Vansant

VAG400928 CP Y 1 Tazewell Elswick Janice Residence STP 214 Webb St Cedar Bluff

VAG400929 CP Y 1 Tazewell Fields Whitney Residence STP 283 Monk Rd Bandy

VAG400932 O&M CP N 1 Russell St. Paul Apparel Inc STP 111 Water Ln St. Paul

VAG400933 CP Y 1 Russell Phillips Paul Arthur Residence STP 1354 Calvary Baptist Rd Castlewood

VAG400934 CP Y 1 Buchanan Keene Brian Residence STP 8519 Slate Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400936 CP Y 1 Buchanan Lester Jerry T Residence STP 1500 Peeled Poplar Rd Grundy

VAG400937 X CP Y 1 Russell Whited Nancy Residence STP 205 Wild Rose Dr Russell County

VAG400938 CP Y 1 Dickenson Fuller Joey Residence STP 3384 Breaks Park Rd Haysi

VAG400940 NB CP Y 1 Russell Robinson Stephen Daniel Residence STP 138 Johnson Hollow Rd Russell County

VAG400945 O&M CP Y 1 Dickenson Meade Sierra Residence STP St Rte 83 Dickenson County

VAG400946 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Gooch Stephen and Melanie Residence STP St Rte 83 Buchanan County

VAG400947 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Jenkins Mark and Tommy Residence STP 325 Christina Ln Clintwood

VAG400950 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Mullins Joseph and Karen Residences STP 3300 Coeburn Rd Dickenson County

VAG400952 NB CP Y 1 Russell Beavers Randall Residence STP 25 Tunnel Rd Honaker

VAG400953 MC CP N 1 Buchanan Wooden Horse Grill STP St Rte 650 Buchanan County

VAG400954 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Owens Sarah E Residence STP St Rte 606 Dickenson Co

VAG400955 X CP Y 1 Dickenson Deel Brandon and Brittany Residence STP 4285 Breaks Park Rd Haysi

VAG400956 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Dorton Byron J and Jennifer R Residence STPSt Rte 607 Dickenson County

VAG400961 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Gibson Larry Residence STP St Rte 647 Buchanan County

VAG400963 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Estep Cline Dale Residence STP St Rte 644 Buchanan County

VAG400964 X NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Stiltner Breck K Residence STP 3162 Old Rocklick Rd Buchanan County

VAG400967 X NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Looney Randy and Dianna Residence STP St Rte 635 Buchanan County

VAG400968 NB CP Y 1 Russell Dye Russell B Residence STP St Rte 622 Russell County

VAG400969 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Hensley William Residence STP 3944 Bull Creek Rd Grundy

VAG400970 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Honaker LonnieP Residence STP St Rte 631 Tazewell County

VAG400971 NB CP Y 1 Russell Mountain Meadows Lots 13, 14 and 15 Residence STPUS 19 and Forrest Lodge Rd Russell County

VAG400972 NB CP N 1 Russell Jeffrey Clifton Dale Business STP 23 Forest Lodge Dr Lebanon

VAG400973 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Clark Allen and Tina Clark St Rte 619 Buchanan County

VAG400974 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Scott Leta Residence STP St Rte 627 Tazewell County

VAG400975 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan May Rickey Residence STP St Rte 643 Buchanan County

VAG400977 X NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Lester Cassandra Residence STP St Rte 600 Buchanan County

VAG400979 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Justus Evanell Residence STP St Rte 675 Buchanan Co

VAG400980 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy Donnie Ray and Jessica Residence STPSt Rte 652 Buchanan Co

VAG400981 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Sparks Rex Residence STP St Rte 686 Tazewell County

VAG400982 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Chambers John Residence STP St Rte 631 Tazewell County

VAG400983 MC CP N 1 Dickenson Paramont Contura LLC - No 88 Strip STP 3210 Monte Rd Bee

VAG400984 NB CP N 1 Russell Roy Gomez Apartments STP 3933 Swords Creek Rd Honaker

VAG400986 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Bandy Darvel Residence STP St Rte 650 Buchanan County

VAG400990 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Wolford Charlie Residence STP St Rte 646 Buchanan County

VAG400993 NB CP N 1 Tazewell Vance Matthew L Residences STP St Rte 699 Tazewell County

VAG400994 NB CP N 1 Russell Maxfield Bernard Residences STP St Rte 630 Russell County

VAG400995 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Deel Patrick Keith Residence STP 1425 JWB Hollow Rd Buchanan County

romano [| Janndroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [vacaoosar|X| ne [or] v | 1 | euchanan [oaes Pre Resdence STP [280 Lemaser Or [ansart [vacaoosze ce] y | + | tarowat [Ewe Janice Restence STP fra wets [evar ou [vaceoosae ce] + [+ | tazower [Feds wnaney Ressnce STP fs8 ook Re leaner [vacaoossa| | cam [oP] n | + | Risser [st Pauappartineste ft water [Pout vacaooess| ce] _y | + | Russet [onmps PauarturResdence sme 1854 cary Bape Ra cestenood jraceooose ce] y| 1 | ecnanan |eane tian Residence ST este Sate crea Ra lewnay [vacaoonae ce] _¥ | 1 | ecnanan [leserJeny TRestence STP S00 Peed Popa lownay [vacacosar |X ce] y [1 | Rosset [wnnea nancy Resdonce STP [2 wie Rose Or Russet Couny [vacoosse ce] y| 1+ | pvxenson [rutr Joy Residence STP se breaks Park ve [vacsoosso| | ne [cP] v | + | Risser [RoonsonStpten DanelRestence STP [198 Jonnson Holow Ra Russet County jraceooses | | caw [or] vy | + | Ocenson fence Serra Resience STP scrie 63 loexeneonGouny jvaceooass] [we [cP | vy | + | suenanan [Gooch Stpnen and sana Residence STS Re 62 [buchanan County [vacaoosar| [| na _[or] v | 1 | oitenson [entine Mak and Tommy Residence STP [225 China Ln [eto Jvacaoosso| | mc [or] w | 1 | oxtenson jane Joseph and Karen Residences STP [2000 Conbum Rd lckenson County |vacaoossa| | no [or] v | 1 | Rumson [osaversRandat Resaence STP fs Tanne onaner [vacaoosss| | mc [oP] n | + | eocnanan wooden Hone Gu STP xR 650 everanan County jraceooose] | we [or] vy | + | cxenson [ovens Sarah & Residence STP sxrie soe Jbeteneon co [vacaoosss |X 2] ¥| + [ Bitenson [Osetsrandon and Stony Residence STP [1285 Beats Park Rd ova [vacaoonse] [na [or] vy | 1 | oitenson [ooron Bron J and snnéerR Residence St Rie 607 Jockenson County [vacaoose wa [oe] y | 1 | archanan [eoson ary Resdnce STP iris oa7 Jovcanan Coty [vacaoosea] | no [cr] v | 1 | evcnanan [exon cine Oa Resence STP rie oe Jeveranan County [vacaoosce|X| ne [cP] | 1 | eucnanan [Sunes Breck K Resence STP 62 1 Rooter Ra [bvcraran County [vacaoooer |X| ne|cp| y | + | Buchanan [Looney Randy and Dianna Ressence STP [St Rie 635 [buchanan County fvaceooase | [ne [cr] vy | + | Russet [oye Russet Residence STP oxrieea2 russe County [vacaoosee] | wo [or] v | + | euchanan [Hensley Witlam Resenca STP eee out Gre Re lovey |vacaoosro] | na [or] v | 1 | Tazowet HonaterLonneP Resence STP rie cor Hazewot county [vacaoosr wo[oe] y| + | reser |Mounian meadows Lots 19, 1¢ and 15Ree{US YoandForesiLadge Ra [Russet County [vacsooar2] | ne | cP] w | + | Russet [Jotey Cinon Dat Busoss STP 23 Forest Losee Oe [esenen fraceooera] | we [or] vy | + | auenanan [oak Aten end Tne Gark acre sie [euchanan County jraceooare| | ne [or] vy | + | Tacowar [scot Leta Restnce STP sxrie car Hazewal County [vacaoosrs| | na[or| v | + | euchanan [iy Rinay Restence STP sxmie oa [buchanan County [vacaoosr7 |X| ne[or| v | 1 | cochanan [lestr ansanca Restence STP strc oo0 oveharan County |vacaoosre] | ne[oP| vy _| + | eocnanan [ists cvanet Residence STP rie ors Joveranan Co [vacaooseo| | ne [cP] vy | 1 | evcnanan [sicy Donne Ray and lessen Resence 5{5(Rie 652 veranan Co fraceoooer wa [om] v1 | tazowet [Spee Rex Residence STP acre eee Fazewel county jvaceoooea] | ne [cr] vy | + | Tacowar [onambers Jann Residence STP xno ear Hazowal County [vacacosea] [| wo [or] w | 1 | Oitenson [Paramont Conte LLC-Nowe Sup STP [2210 Monto Ra lose [vacacosee| [na [or] w | + | Rumson [Roy Gomez Aparment STP sea Swords Crook Ra = [vacaooses| [| no [or] vy | 1 | evcnanan [Bandy aneiResince STP xr 050 Joveranan Coty [vacaoosso] | ne [cP] vy _| + | evcanan |wotors Chart Resende STP sxrie oxo everanan County jvaceoooes] | we [or] w | 1 | Tazowon [vance athow LRescences st? [evriwsoo Fazewel county jraceoowoe] | ne [or] _w | + | Russet [are rand Rescences STP strie cao [Russet Couny [vacacosss| [ne [or] v | + | eucnanan [ose Pack Kath Residence STP 425 awe Hclow Ra [evchanan County

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400996 NB CP N 1 Buchanan Dollar General Store STP - Hurley St Rte 643 Buchanan County

VAG400997 NB CP Y 2 Russell Barnhart Angela Residence STP 414 Arnold Rd Honaker

VAG400999 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Strouth Kayla Residence STP St Rte 67 Tazewell County

VAG409000 MC CP Y 1 Buchanan Blankenship Sandra Residence STP St Rte 83 Buchanan County

VAG409001 NB CP Y 1 Russell Campbell Cecil Douglas Residence STP 7954 Swords Creek Rd Russell County

VAG409003 NB CP Y 2 Russell Artrip Freeman Residence STP St Rte 664 Russell County

VAG409004 NB CP Y 1 Russell Miller Kathy Residence STP St Rte 670 Russell County

VAG409007 NB CP Y 1 Russell Sims Floyd and Amanda Residence STP St Rt 67 Russell County

VAG409008 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Willis Phillip Residence STP St Rte 610 Buchanan County

VAG409009 MC CP N 1 Tazewell Green Peggy Residences STP 260 Baptist Valley Rd Tazewell County

VAG409013 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Clifton Anthony Residence STP 7392 Hurley Rd Buchanan County

VAG409014 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Nora Community Sewerage Project-Area 1 STPSt Rte 63 Dickenson County

VAG409015 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Nora Community Sewerage Project-Area 2 STPSt Rte 63 Dickenson County

VAG409016 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Nora Community Sewerage Project-Area 3 STPSt Rte 63 Dickenson County

VAG409018 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Childress Ralph J and Beulah J Residence STP1532 Polly Pd Bluefield

VAG409020 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Vance Joseph Residence STP St Rte 609 Tazewell County

VAG409021 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Christian Jim Residence STP St Rte 652 Buchanan County

VAG409022 NB CP Y 1 Russell Dye Rafty and Deborah K Residence STP St Rte 632 Russell County

VAG409024 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Cox Milton Lee Residence STP 944 Wolfe Pen Rd Dickenson County

VAG409025 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Rasnake Loraine Residence STP 1731 Pealog Branch Rd Buchanan Co

VAG409028 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Thomas James Donald Residence STP 118 Rakes Ridge Rd Birchleaf

VAG409029 O&M CP N 1 Russell Gas Field Services Inc STP 17908 US Hwy 19 Rosedale

VAG409030 NB CP Y 1 Russell Griffith Peggy N Residence STP St Rt 670 Russell County

VAG409031 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Hull Russell and Samantha Residence STP 391 Spring Branch Dr Dickenson County

VAG409032 X NB CP N 1 Buchanan Blankenship Henry C and Lillian Residences STP1335 Crescent Rd Buchanan County

VAG409033 CP Y 1 Tazewell Graham Mellie Residence STP 2658 Dry Fork Rd Bandy

VAG409035 CP N 1 Buchanan Allen Boyd R Residences STP 3890 Knox Creek Dr Hurley

VAG409039 NB CP Y 1 Russell Meade Teddy L Residence STP 4301 High Point Rd Russell County

VAG409042 NB CP N 1 Russell Phillips Anthony Residences STP Old School Way Russell County

VAG409043 X NB CP N 1 Buchanan Pilgrims Knob Rescue Squad STP 13228 Dismal River Rd Pilgrims Knob

VAG409045 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Rose Daniel and Linda Residences STP 4512 Doctor Stanley Hwy Coeburn

VAG409047 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Prater Jonathan W Residence STP 1195 Peeled Poplar Rd Grundy

VAG409048 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Dunford Denise C SFH STP 256 Addison Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG409050 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Coleman’s Methodist Church Parsonage STP6803 Lovers Gap Rd Buchanan County

VAG409051 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Rife Angie and Wolford Danny Residence STP1008 River Bottom Dr Buchanan County

VAG409052 CP Y 1 Buchanan Billiter Johnny and Pamela Residence STP 2107 Woods Fork Rd Grundy

VAG409055 X NB CP Y 1 Russell Owens Juanita Residence STP 545 Mannheim Rd Lebanon

VAG409056 NB CP N 1 Dickenson Strouth Phillip Residences STP 1085 Honey Camp Rd Clintwood

VAG409058 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Matney Ernest E Residence STP 1020 Greenfield Rd Vansant

VAG409060 NB CP Y 1 Russell Harris Danny B and Rema Residence STP St Rte 647 Russell County

VAG409065 NB CP Y 2 Russell McGlothlin Deidra Residence STP Cedar Cliff Rd Russell County

VAG409066 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Lee Amanda and Shannon Residence STP 2907 Upper Elk Creek Dr Hurley

VAG409068 NB CP Y 1 Russell Meadows James and Tammy Residence STPOff US 19 Russell County

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [vacacosse] | ne [or] w | + | euchanan [Oot General Soe STP Huey sxmie oa Jovcanan County [vacaoossr| | ne [or] v | 2 | Russon [Borman anglaResionce STP Istana Re = [vacaoosso| | wo [or] v | + | Tazwwon [arom Kaya Resdence STP [sre o7 Hacewer county [vacaosoco] | mc [cP] v | + | eucnaan [oankensno Sanaa Residence STP |[stRieed everanan County fvaceosoor] [ne [op] y | + | Rosset [Carper CociOougas Resaence SP [7954 Sur Greek Ra [Russet Coony jvacaooooa] | ne [or] vy | 2 | Russet [atin Freeman Restence STP sxmie cea [Russet County [vacaoscoe| | na [or] v | + | Risser terkaty Restence STP sxrie oro [sso Coot |vacaosear| | ne [or] v | + | Rumson [omerioysandamanda Residence sve [aRIG? russet County [vacaosoce| | ne [or] v_| + | eocnanan [was Pht Resaence STP rie o10 Jecranan County [vacaosoos] | mc [cP] n | + | Tazewen [Green Pesay Readences STP aso Bap vatey Ra Hazewel Coney fraceooors] | ne [or] vy _| + | auenanan [eiton antony Resence STP 02 une Re Jevcanan County jraceooore] | ne [cP | _w | + | eckenson or Conmunty Sewerage ProjectArea 1 Ste 62 locxenean County [vacaosars| | na [or] _w | 1 | oitenson fora ommunty Sewerage Project Area? st Rie 6 lOckeneon County [vacaosare| | na [or] w | 1 | oitenson ora communty Sewerage ProectAra 3 st Ri 63 lOckenson County [vacaosore| | no [cr] v | 1+ | tazewen [oness Rah and Bevan JRessenoe 1592 Poly Pa lowetes [vacaosozo] | ne [oP] v | + | Tazewen [ance Joseph Residence STP xR 609 Hazewel Coney fraceoooes| | we [or | vy | + | auenanan [ontan in Residence SP acre esa Jovcanan County jvaceoooae | | we [or| vy | + | russot [oye RatyandDeborankResdence STP [sxe ax2 [Russet County [vacaoseae| | ne [or] v | + | Oxtenson [Conon se Resdence STP ove woe Pen a lOckeneon County [vacaoseas| | na [or] v | 1 | eucaan [Rasnate Loraine Residence STP 731 Peas Gren Ra lovcanan Co [vacaoseze| | no [cP] v | + | oxnonson [Tomas James Dons Reston STP [110 Rakes Roge Ra ercnear [vacaosoze| | cam [cP] n | + | Risser [Gasriusenicos neSTP 7006 us Hy 19 rosea jvaceoooso] | we [or] vy | + | Russet [ontmPenayn Resende STP lsrvero Russet Coony fraceoooar| [ne [P| vy | + | eckensn [ur Russet and Samanta Restence SP [set Sping ranch Or loctenean Coury [vacaosesa|K | na _[or| nw | 1 | euchanan [aankensip Hemy Cand Ullan Restences [1235 Crescent Ra [schanan Coty [vacaosena ce] _y | 1+ | tarowat [Graham Mette Restence STP ese or Fon Re lesnay [vacaosons| Ge] w| 1+ | evcnanan [aon Boyd Residences STP eso Knox creek or lraey [vacosose] | ne [oP] v | + | Russer_fiease Tosdyt Residence STP [301 Han Pom Re Russet Couny jvaceoooe2] | we [oP | _w | + | Russet [nips annony Residences STP [ott senor way russe County [vacsosous|X| ne _[cP] N | + | eucnanan [Pipamstnob Rescue Squad STP (15228 Dismal River Ra = [vacaosoas| | na [or] nw | 1 | oitenson [Rowe Danetand Linda Restences STP [4512 Dacor Stny Hy [costum |vacaosoar| | na [or| vy | + | euchaan [Pater sonatanw Residence STP [1195 Peed Pola Ra louney [vacaosore] | no [or] v | + | tazewen [ountrs Dense CaF STP bse aaason Re [evar ou [vacaososo| | ne [cP] v | + | eocnnan [coeman’s metodst urn Parsonage ST#809 Lovers Gap Ra everanan County fraceoooss| | we [P| vy | + | auehanan [Rife ange and Watord Dany Resitence 8008 River Botlom Br [eranan Coty fraceooose | _¥ | 1 | ecnanan [eater onnny and Pamela Restence STP [2107 woods Fon: Ra lownay [vacaosess|K| ne [or] v | + | russen [Ovens Janta Residence STP [46 Manniem Ra letenen [vacaosese| | ne [or] w | + | Ornenson [stout Phi Restences STP 085 Honey Camp Ra [entoon [vacaosose| | no [or] vy | 1 | evcnanan pianeyEmeste Resdence STP cao creoni Re [ansant [vacaososo] | ne [cP] v | + | Russet [Hart ony® and Rema Reston STP [StRie 687 Russet Couny fraceoooss | | ne [or] vy | 2 | Russet |vccomin Deaa Resende STP cecar cute russes Coony jvacaoooss| [ne [cp | vy | + | auenanan [tse Amanda and Shannon Restence SP [2007 Uper Ek Greek Dr lay [vacosese| [ne [or] v | + | Russon [seasons James and Tammy Residence ST{OHUS 19 russet County

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG409069 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Adkins John and Victoria Residence STP Off St Rte 650 Buchanan County

VAG409072 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Goss Denny Residence STP 1157 Ascue Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG409073 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Woods Brandon S Residence STP Off St Rte 673 Buchanan County

VAG409074 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Justus John and Maggie Residence STP Off St Rte 659 Buchanan County

VAG409075 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan McCoy Daniel Residence STP Off St Rte 647 Buchanan Co

VAG409081 x NB CP Y 1 Russell Kite Jeff and Jennifer Residence STP 100 North Mill Hollow Rd Russell County

VAG409082 NB CP Y 1 Russell Kennedy Rita Residence STP 1207 Rocky Fork Rd Russell County

VAG409083 CP N 1 Buchanan Justus Richard Residences STP 1379 Puncheon Camp Rd Buchanan County

VAG409084 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Gray Charles and Cathy Residence STP 1476 Elijah Branch Rd Buchanan County

VAG409085 O&M CP N 1 Buchanan Russell Prater Elementary School 8433 Lover’s Gap Rd Buchanan County

VAG409086 O&M CP Y 1 Russell Stevens Christina Residence STP St Rte 615 Russell County

VAG409087 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Stiltner Jessee and Kayla Residence STP 2006 Steelsburg Hwy Tazewell County

VAG409088 CP N 1 Russell Cliffield Homes Inc. STP 12816 US Hwy 19 Russell County

VAG409091 NB CP Y 2 Russell Harman Cass Residence STP Dorado Bottom Rd Russell County

VAG409092 NB CP Y 1 Russell Smith Terry Residence STP 1135 Fork Ridge Rd Lebanon

VAG409093 NB CP Y 1 Dickenson Gulley Michael Residence STP St Rte 631 Dickenson County

VAG409094 MC CP Y 1 Tazewell Goodie Michael and Rebecca Residence STP2606 Indian Creek Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG409097 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Powers Freda Residence STP St Rte 600 Buchanan County

VAG409098 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Elswick Carmie Residence STP St Rte 631 Tazewell County

VAG409100 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Rife Jory Residence STP 4937 Hale Creek Rd Pilgrims Knob

VAG409101 NB CP Y 2 Tazewell Richardson Shelma Residence STP 290 Woodall St Tazewell County

VAG409102 CP N 1 Buchanan Jewell Coal and Coke Co 3 - Side Lunchroom STPSt Rte 638 Buchanan County

VAG409104 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Matney James Residence STP Off St Rt 617 Buchanan County

VAG409107 X NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Pruitt Elmer Residence STP 1011 Nance Fork Circle Buchanan County

VAG409109 CP Y 1 Tazewell Tetlow Jeanie Colley Residence STP St Rt 631 Tazewell County

VAG409110 CP N 1 Tazewell Dunford Roofing Rentals STP 132 and 114 Burton Hollow Rd Tazewell County

VAG409111 X CP Y 1 Buchanan Fraley Coty M Residence STP St Rte 645 Buchanan County

VAG409116 CP N 1 Buchanan Hurley Brian K Residences STP 1196 Mohagany Rd Honaker

VAG409118 CP N 1 Dickenson Bowman Joey Residences STP 303 Kayes Cove Clintwood

VAG409119 CP Y 1 Tazewell Stiltner Judith Ann Residence STP 6290 Clearf Fork Rd Tazewell

VAG409120 CP Y 1 Dickenson Hensley Rhonda Vanover Residence STP Off St Rte 72 Dickenson County

VAG409122 CP Y 1 Buchanan Compton Chase Residence STP Off St Rte 602 Buchanan County

VAG409123 CP Y 1 Dickenson Phipps Ruby H Residence STP 1902 Brush Creek Rd Clintwood

VAG409124 CP Y 1 Tazewell Lester Cody B and Charlotte Residence STP Off St Rte 626 Tazewell County

VAG409125 CP N 1 Dickenson Four Way STP 136 Four Way Circle Dickenson County

VAG409126 NB CP Y 1 Buchanan Gibson Geneva Residence STP Off St Rt 653 Buchanan Co

VAG409127 x NB CP Y 1 Russell Penley Connie Residence STP 3207 Drill Rd Russell Co

VAG409130 NB CP Y 1 Tazewell Wood Larry D and Wanda S Residence STP 745 Johnsons Branch Rd Tazewell County

VAG409131 CP N 1 Dickenson Owens Levearne Residences STP 845 Sandlick Rd Dickenson Co

VAG409132 CP Y 1 Tazewell Vance Michael and Virginia Residence STP 1804 Baptist Valley Rd Tazewell County

VAG409133 CP N 1 Dickenson Presley Frank and Jennifer Residence STP Pickett Rd Dickenson County

VAG409135 CP Y 1 Russell Justice Barbara Residence STP 21808 Hwy 19 Russell Co

VAG409136 CP Y 1 Buchanan Jackson Matthew and Alisha Residence STP Stiltner Creek Rd Buchanan Co

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [vacaosece| | ne [or] v | + | euchanan [Adkins onn and Vora Restence TP [on Ste 650 [chanan Gouny [vacaosara| [na [or] v | 1+ | Tazowen [Goss Deon Residence STP 167 aso Ra [cover ou [vacaosora| | no [or] v | + | eocnanan [woods randonSResdence ste [onsinea7a Jecranan County [vasaooore| | we [cm] v _| 1 | @vcnanan [us Jctnand Moage Residence STP _[OHSiRw 650 Jschanan Gouty jraceooors] | we [oP| vy | + | sucnanan [coy danei Residence STP lorsiiee er lavcranan Go [vacosent|x | veer] v | + | musser [ete Jetta vernterResdence STP [100 Norh Ml Holow Ra Russet Coony [vacaosesa] | ne [or] v | + | reson [kennedy Rta Restence STP 207 Rocky For Re Russet County [vacaosoea Ge] _w | 1 | ercnanan [ite Richard Resdonces STP a7 Pueneon Camp Re Jocranan Coty [vacaosose| | no [or] vy | + | eocnanan [ory craves and Cay Residence SP [1476 Ean Branch Re Jevcranan Coty [vasaoooes | | oem [ce] _w _| 1 | Qvchanan [Ruel Prater foment Sowa e439 Lovers Gap Re Jschanan Gouty jvaceoooes | | cam [or] vy | + | Russot [steven Cratna Resende STP scrie ois Russet Coony fracaoooer| [we [cr | vy | + | Tazowat [Sttnerdesace and Kaya Reence STP [2006 Steibug Hy Hezovel County [vacaosoee ce] Ww | + | Russet [oven Homes ine STP 2016 US Hey 10 Russet Cooty [vacaosest| | na [or] v | 2 | Ausor [Haman Care Residence ST [ore Batam Ra Russet Coot [vacaososa| | no [or] v | + | Risser [smi enyRescence STP fis Fon ie Re [esanen [vacaoooes | | we [om] v _| 1 | oikenson [outy mahal Restonce Se frie 631 [bekenson County fraceooose] | me [op] vy | + | Tazowar [ocode mcnae and Rebecca Resence ST[2806 indian Greek Ra [evar Bua fracaoooe7| | we [cp | vy | + | sucnanan [power Freca Residence STP etre coo [enanan Coty [vacaosese| | na [or] v | 1+ | Tazowat [ewe Carne Restence STP xrie car Hacowel County [vacaosico] | ne [or] v | + | eocnanan [ate sory Reston STP [997 Wale Crook Ra Pini Knob [vacaosror| | no [or] v | 2 | tazewen [Renaison Shaina Resdence STP [200 wooden St Hazewer county [vacsosto2 ce] w| + | ercnanan [rower Coa and Coe Co3- See Luncreorf st Rie 698 everanan County fraceooroe] | ne [or] vy | + | auenanan [aney James Ressence STP lorsinvei7 [eranan Gouty [vacaonrar|X| veer] v | + | eucnanan [prtteimerRestence STP fort Nance Fork Gia [uenanan Coty [vacaosrae ce] y | + | tacewat [Tetow Jeanie Coley Resdance st __[exrvcat Hacovel County [vacosr0 ce] w | + | arowet [Own Roofng Renate STP faz and 114 Burton clown [Tazowel Cauniy [vacaonrrs [X CF] ¥| 1 | Boeranan [Frey Coy MResence STP sire ons [uchonan County [vaseoarse ce] w| + | eecnanan [Hey Baan Residences STP 186 wonagany Ra orate fraceooire Ge] _w | 1 | fitenson [aouman Joey Residences STP fos Kayes cove [mood fraceoair9 ce] y | + | taxewat [eutnersudinaonResdence stp (e000 her once Hazewet [vacaowr20| ce] _¥ | 1 | ditenson [Hensey Ronda Vanover Reskence STP [OH Si Rt 72 lOckeneon County [vacaost2a | ¥| 1 | Boerenan [Conpion Chase Resuorce STP lorie 002 [chonan County [vacaost20 | ¥[ 1 | oeaenson [Pnipns Ruy Rescence STP soa eran rook Re [emi [vaseoarze ce] ¥| + | tazowe [Lester cow ® ans Chafote Readence STP|OH St Ri 625 Hazewel Coney fraceooras ce] w+ | eitenson [rou waystP fos Fou way Gro lbcxeneon County jraceooras] | we [cr] vy | + | suenanan [ataon Geneva Resende STP lorsinvess leunanan Go |vacaonrar|x | ne[or| v | + | mussen [Perey Connie Residence STP bo? ona asset Co [vasaoora0] [we [ce |v _| 1 | Tesewot [wooden and Wan SResdoce STF|745ltnsons Branch Ra Hazewot county [vacaosta4 ce] w| 1 | oetenson [Owens Leveame Resdences STP [oss Sanaa Ra loerenson co [vacaosts2 Gey _| + | tazewor [Vance mines and Via Residence SP [104 Batt Vaby Ro Hazewel Coney fraceoorsa | _w | 1 | Bictenson[Prestay Frank and Jenner Residence STP [Peet Ra loexeneon county fraceoaras ce] y | + | Russet [istce darare Rescence SP oe ty #9 russe co [vacaontae | ¥| 1 | ecnanan [ieckon Mathew anc Asha Resitence STr|stiner Greek Rd loucranan Co

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG409137 CP N 1 Buchanan J.M. Bevins Community Center STP 8668 Slate Creek Rd Buchanan

VAG409138 CP Y 1 Tazewell Carston Ford Residence STP 116 Lincoln St Pounding Mill

VAG409139 CP N 1 Buchanan R & J Properties No 2 STP 1009 Pine Cone Rd Buchanan County

VAG409140 CP N 1 Buchanan Dollar General - Slate Creek STP St Rt 83 Buchanan County

VAG409142 CP Y 1 Buchanan Love Lacy Residence STP St Rt 645 Buchanan County

VAG409143 CP Y 1 Buchanan Oquin Bobby E Residence STP St Rt 83 Buchanan County

VAG409144 CP Y 1 Buchanan Stacy James W Residence STP Off St Rt 643 Buchanan County

VAG409146 CP Y 1 Buchanan Griffey Lois Residence STP Off St Rt 651 Buchanan County

VAG409147 CP Y 1 Buchanan Davis Johnny and Eva Residence STP Off St Rt 635 Buchanan County

VAG409148 CP N 1 Buchanan Ramey Willard and Verna Residences STP Off St Rt 645 Buchanan County

VAG409149 CP Y 1 Buchanan Looney Brenda Kay Residences STP 1066 Pecan Rd Grundy

VAG409150 CP Y 1 Russell Shepard Donna Residence STP 892 US Hwy 19 Russell County

VAG409151 CP Y 1 Russell Robinette Candace Residence STP 8322 North 71 Russell County

VAG409152 CP Y 1 Buchanan Charles Sylvia H Residence STP St Rt 620 Buchanan County

VAG409153 CP Y 1 Tazewell Vance Matthew L Single Family Residence STPSt Rt 637 Tazewell County

VAG409154 CP Y 1 Buchanan Owens Sammy Residence No. 1 STP St Rt 737 Buchanan County

VAG409155 CP Y 1 Buchanan Owens Sammy Residence No. 2 STP St Rt 737 Buchanan County

VAG409156 CP Y 1 Dickenson Lyall Sue R Residence STP Off St Rt 63 Dickenson County

VAG409158 CP Y 1 Buchanan Bailey Melissa Residence STP 1959 Mountain Laurel Rd Hurley

VAG409159 CP Y 1 Buchanan Johnny Dotson 17819 Hurley Rd Buchanan County

VAG409162 CP N 1 Dickenson Hamilton George Residences STP 973 Crabtree Hollow Clintwood

VAG409163 CP Y 1 Russell Yates Scotty and Bonnie Residence STP 2095 Cabo Rd Russell County

VAG409172 CP Y 1 Russell Brendlinger Robert L. Residence STP US Hwy 19 Russell County

VAG409175 CP Y 1 Tazewell Phillips Seth Residence STP Off US 19 Tazewell County

VAG409178 CP Y 1 Tazewell Cordle Keith D and Amanda B Residence STP1297 Willow Springs Rd Tazewell County

VAG409180 CP Y 1 Russell Amos Marvin E Jr Residence STP St Rt 700 Russell County

VAG409183 CP Y 1 Buchanan Humbert Ida Roselee Residence STP 2155 Leemaster Dr Vansant

VAG409184 CP Y 1 Dickenson Sykes Carmelia Residence STP 138 Willow Lane Clintwood

VAG409185 CP Y 1 Buchanan Davis Jerry Residence STP St Rt 650 Buchanan County

VAG409186 CP Y 1 Buchanan Rife Chase and Morgan Residence STP Little Prater Rd Buchanan County

VAG409188 CP N 1 Dickenson Snowball Hollow Shooting Range STP 418 Dixon Range Rd Clintwood

VAG409189 CP Y 1 Dickenson Mullins Dawn Allison Residence STP 478 Clay Taylor Hollow Rd Clincho

VAG409190 CP Y 1 Buchanan Ramey Ronald Jordan Residence STP Buchanan County at U.T. of Charles

Fork located off of Woodchuck Road Grundy

VAG409191 CP Y 1 Dickenson Fleming Kaitlyn Residence STP TBD Willow Lane Clintwood

VAG409192 CP Y 1 Dickenson Rogers Judy Residence STP 1193 Breaks Park Rd Haysi

VAG409194 CP Y 1 Dickenson Rowe Aaron Residence STP 4048 S of the Mountain Rd Clintwood

VAG409196 CP Y 1 Buchanan Stiltner Johnny R Residence STP ST Rt 609 Maxie

VAG409199 CP Y 1 Buchanan Boyd Logan and Savannah Residence STP 1014 Flat Rock Rd Grundy

VAG409200 CP Y 1 Buchanan Keen Harold and Tammy Residence STP 1027 Sheppard Rd Rowe

VAG409201 CP Y 1 Buchanan Elswick Christine Residence STP 4578 Bull Creek Rd Grundy

VAG409202 CP Y 1 Tazewell Bagielto Paul Residence STP 2324 Baptist Valley Rd Cedar Bluff

VAG409203 CP Y 2 Dickenson Herald Glenn Residence STP 131 Jim Hess Rd Birchleaf

VAG409204 CP N 2 Tazewell Richard Hudson-Clinch River Farms STP Estates Dr Pounding Mill

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [racworar cP] nv | 1 | esctanan [ya Seve Gonmaniy Cover ST? [sess Sin cena conan [racsorae cP] vy | 1 | Tewwat[oonton Fou Resdnca STP Fie uncon en [racsoras cP] w| 1 | ecto Rav Ropers nz > fo09 Fn Con ma bucraran Com [racsoreo cP] w | 1 | Bitar [oor cenwai-saie corer? fares bicaran Coty aceon cy] 1 | eure [ve cy Retoee STP mos euchnan oumiy co cr] y| 1 | eicenan [Osun sothy Resdece STP armss Jauchanan Couniy [ractoree cP] vy _| 1 | eictanan [icy snes W Resknce STP lorsines Jauchanan Cuniy [racrores cP] vy | 1 | sitar [ot Reson SP lorsimsi icaran Com [racsoner cP] vy | 1 | eronan [bows stony an’ eva Restence STP _[omstnress bvcaran Com [racsones cP | w | 1 | Bvtanan [Ramey vt and Vea Renee Sm [onsite bicaran Cont Naceoniee cv | 1 | euctenan [oorey ends KeyRenderee 5? io Pecan lewnay laceoeiso cP] y| + | Rosset |Shepad Deora Residence STP es ty 19 Just Cosy [racrors cP] vy | 1 | user [RobrateConacoRoscence ST? _[es22 non Just County [ractonee cP] vy] 1 | eran [onres Sint since STP sme bucoran Gomi [racsones cP] vy _| 1 | tamwor ance nathow Si Fay Repenc Sth 657 Tawa Cony [racsorse cP] vy | 1 | ecto [Overs Sammy Resencno,161e __stRtTa7 bscaran Cont aceon cr] y | + | aichoan [Owens Sanmy Rendon No, 281P [sinter euchnen Coumiy co cr | _y | 1 | extern [iat suet Restence se lorsimes Deterson Coury [racronee cP| y| 1 | euchanan [aie ess Resdenc STP foo MounintaweiRa bey [racsonee cP] y | 1 | eictonan inenyDaton Freie roy buchanan Gomi [racsonea cP |» | 1 | oetenen orton Googe Restenees TP [pr9 Gabtee Haw crmood [racsones cP] vy | 1 | eset [YotsScoty ana Boni Resenc ST v0 cabo Ra use coy Vaceowira cr] vy | 1 | maser [enaigerRotea Roscoe sr? [Us tay Just cosiy lacaooirs ce] vy | 1 | teswar [Pips Sen Residence STP lorus aww Coury [ractorre cP] vy | 1 | Teewar [Gero Ket and Ananda 8 Resenco 5127 Wow Sino Re Tewwa ouny [ractoreo cP] vy [1 | user [pnosnonwne ufesioncest® __[avni7e0 Fuso Cony [racsones cP] vy | 1 | even jomboriio Rosie Rosconce STP rtesteonaseror Nasa [racsoree cP] y | 1 | Berenson [ses Cometa Resinee ST fe wow ane ctmood Vacaowies cy] 1 | eucenan [bev dy Renee STP ms Jeuchnan Coumiy co cP] vy | 1 | eucenan [fe Chase anderen Renzerc STP [ue Pree Rs Jeuchanan Cauniy vacroore > |» | 1 | bitnson [Snovbat tow Stoina Rang ST? [18 Oo Range Ra [rood vacsooie i | y| 1 | pienson tins Dan Aon Reson Pie Gy Tyor how Ra = jacooie > |v | 1 | etanan [Ramey Roatan Reson or? NCU aS nay fracsoist cP |v _| 1 | Binion [renina Kain Resience STP [20 tow tare crood [racsoisa lop |v | 1 | bitnson [oer Jay Resione STP fe3 Bea Pan ra le Vaceovien ono lot of vein Rd = co o> | _v | 1 | euchanan [ster otonyR Residence sre ___forene ene [racrooree > |v _| 1 | everanan [re onan ana Savanah Renaonen 7? [ie Fat Rock Rd lows [racsszon i> |v _| 1 | everanan [oon Haak and Tommy Rstoca STP [1027 Shona owe fracooeot icp |v _| 1 | everanan [eiwek sre Rosen sre ‘sre autores Ra = [racsoaca i> |v | 1 | Teoma [gio Pau Renee STP ace eocttvatey Ra cera Vacaouz le? | _¥ | 2 | etnaon ert Gon Resenee STF fai en Hew ero vacaoizoe o> | 6 _| 2 | tecewat [hrs user Ginch River Fame STP [esi O own

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG409205 CP Y 1 Russell Stinson Carline Residence STP 558 Crackers Neck Rd Cleveland

VAG409207 CP Y 2 Dickenson Sexton Cody and Kendra Residence STP 3364 Lick Creek Rd Haysi

VAG409211 CP Y 1 Buchanan Matney Brian and Melissa Residence STP Old Lester’s Fork Rd Grundy

VAG409213 CP Y 1 Buchanan Boyd Robert and Linda Residence STP 1082 Ardue and Jane Rd Vansant

VAG409215 CP Y 1 Russell Frazier David and Jill LeRoy Residence STP 561 North Mill Hollow Rd Castlewood

VAG409217 O & M CP N 1 Dickenson Stanley Dempsey Kevin Residences STP 7884 Dickenson Hwy Clintwood

VAG400005 O&M LEN N 2 Wise Adams Irene Residence STP 11028 Woodrow Adams Rd Pound

VAG400008 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Arnold Julia Residence STP 5369 Daniel Boone Rd Gate City

VAG400010 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Austin Bobby Residence STP 5387 Natural Tunnel Pkwy Duffield

VAG400011 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Bailey Aaron K Residence STP 122 Daniel Boone Rd Gate City

VAG400013 MC LEN N 1 Scott GPM Investments LLC - Fasmart 424 224 Wadlow Gap Road Gate City

VAG400015 X LEN Y 1 Wise Baugh James Residence STP 2301 Egan Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400016 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Vanover Timothy Residence STP 5220 Back Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400017 MC LEN N 1 Scott Bellamy James Fred Residences STP 1234 Colonial Post Office Rd Gate City

VAG400019 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Bethel Chapel Church STP 6220 Johns Road Wise

VAG400020 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Kirk Dean F Residence STP 5516 Kilgore Rd Wise

VAG400021 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Nicholas Residence STP 9935 Bowzer Rd Pound

VAG400028 NB LEN Y 2 Scott Boy Riley Residence STP 726 Daniel Boone Rd Gate City

VAG400037 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Calhoun Jimmy Residence STP 114 Quarryview Ln Gate City

VAG400044 MC LEN N 1 Wise Pound Double Kwik 10107 Orbey Cantrell Hwy Pound

VAG400049 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Cole Mary Residence STP 4042 Tate Springs Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400052 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Rowe Taylor Yeary Residence STP 9223 Percy Rd Wise

VAG400054 LEN Y 1 Wise Wilson Victor Wayne and Carolyn Jean

Wilson Residence STP 1727 Egan Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400057 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Cox Linda G Residence STP 1353 Hilton Rd Gate City

VAG400060 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Dale Pat & Carroll Residences STP 9533 Coeburn Mountain Road Wise

VAG400061 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Darter Douglas & Sandra Residence STP 286 Barbour Hollow Ln Gate City

VAG400082 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Gardner Phillip C Residence STP 196 Countryshire Circle Hiltons

VAG400083 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Bledsoe George Residence STP 697 Sinks Rd Blackwater

VAG400084 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Gibson Monnie C Residence STP 163 Goose Neck Dr Gate City

VAG400089 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Greene Tim & Brenda Residence STP 5110 Thackers Branch Road Norton

VAG400091 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Hamilton James Richard Residences 6332 Black Stone Rd Wise

VAG400095 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Williams Benny J II Residence STP 1005 Manville Rd Gate City

VAG400097 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Cole Thomas Donald Lee Residence STP 5749 Natural Tunnel Pkwy Duffield

VAG400099 O&M LEN Y 1 Wise Fultz Terry L Residence STP 2459 Egan Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400101 O&M LEN Y 1 Wise Horne Richard Jr Residence STP 1920-C East Stone Gap Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400110 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Jessee Randal Residence STP 6888 Jones Hollow Road Norton

VAG400118 MC LEN N 1 Lee Keokee Volunteer Fire Department STP 153 Fire Hall Rd Keokee

VAG400119 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Armstrong Faith Residence STP 1737 Nottingham Rd Gate City

VAG400121 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Kilgore Glenn Residence STP 6933 Hurricane Rd Wise

VAG400128 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise McAfee Carl Residence STP 5937 Powell Valley Rd Norton

VAG400131 LEN Y 1 Scott Ramsey Kierra Residence STP 115 Cavalier Dr Gate City

VAG400132 LEN Y 1 Wise Fraley Lori Residence STP 2012 East Stone Gap Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400135 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Messer Glen Residence STP 5579 Thackers Branch Road Norton

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [vaceoweas lo |v | 1 | Riser [Sineon Carne Resaonee STP is Cracks Neck Ra [Gmina [seoo207 le? | ¥ | 2 | Betenson [sen Coayand Kenda Regence TP [964 Uk Cesk Ra avi [vactosann lr | ¥ | 1 | euctanan [ater aran and Mela Resitnce st [old ener Fora [eundy [vactosans cr |v | 1 | euctanan [oovd Robertand nda Reience TP [082 Arse andane Re Nonsant [vactosans lr |v | 1 | rosset [renee bovdanditetoy Residence stP [si Nonh Mil Hatow Rd castewood frcwoai7|[oam [ce | 6 | 1 [pesenon [sanieyoempsey tevin Resdencs stp [788 Dkenson Huy eimwood [vassoooos | [oa [un] nN | 2 | Wee _[ademsirone Rendoce STP 1028 cos Adame Feina [vassooona | [me [unl vy | 1 | Seok [anoisiuteResdence STP 0 Dent oone Re [ose cay [vassoooro | [mc _[uen| vy | 1 | Seo _[pusinSonby Ressence STP 7 Na Tone Paw [owes Jvassooors | [oam [uen] vy | 1 | Seok _[paieyAwonk Residence STP 22 baie one Re [eae ory fraceooora] | we [ven] w | + | Seow [epwinvesmonsiic.Fesmanaze [224 wadow Gap Rona [ete cay [vacaooors |X ten] [1 [wae [ugh Jones Residence STP [att Egan Ross la Stone Gap [vacsooors | [owm [uen] v | 1 | wae _[vanovertinoty Resence STP 5220 Back Vatey Rone fa Stone Gap [vacsooor7| [me [unl N | 1 | Seok [potomyanres ea Rensoncee STP [1204 CalniaPontORceRa [Gai Cay [vassoooie| | oam [uen] | 1 | wae _[pomelchapei crucn STP 220 Jos Ros wee [vassooozo | oam [uenl vy | 1 | wae |kiDeanF Reserce SP ste niaoe Re wee jvaceoooar| | omm [uen] vy | 1 | wae ine icnoas Restence STP 2s Boner rane jvaceoooze] [ne [ven] y | 2 | Scot [boy RimyRestenoe STP 26 Danone Re [ate cay [vacsoooa7 | [me [un] vy _| 1 | Seo _[Cahoun.mmy Ressence STP fi Quarwiewtn ose cey [vassoooee | [me [un] w+ | wae [Pena bose nik foto7 oxy Cantot Hy Feira [vassooow= | | oam [uenl vy _| 1 | war _|coeton Rendon STP [2 Tae Spnos Ross fb Stone ep [vassooose | [ oam [uenl vy | 1 | wae [Rowe TavorveayRestencestP (223 PeeyRe wee [raceonose len] ¥ | + | wee [Rona Warne ans CaGIN 68 Tirar Egan [ba Stone Gap [vassooos7 | [-oam [uen] vy | 1 | Seok Coxtnsa Resuonce STP fs non [baw cry [vactoonco] [own [cen] | + | wae [[email protected] STP _[s550ContumNounan Road [Wise [vassooos | [ oam [un] vy | 1 | Seok [DarerOnigis & Santa Rentece STP [206 Barbour How in [oa cay [vassooose | [oa [uen] v | 1 | Seok _|GannerPhiip ¢ Restence STP se Countystie roo = [vassoooes | [mc _[uenl vy | 1 | Seok [Pninoe George Reatence STP esr Sr Ro laacknter [vassoooss | [mc [usu] v _| 1 | Seon [GdsonNonie¢ Residence STP fs Goose Neck Or [eae cry jvaceoooee] | omm [en] y | + | wee |GteonetmacrendaReszence stP _[st10Tnackes ranonRoas _[Nonon [vaceoooer| [ omm [en] w | + | wee [HammonsomesRenaaResserces [S352 Buck Sone Re wee [vacsoooos[ | o@m [un] v | 1 | Sot [witanetemnysiResience STP [s005Manae Ra [ose cay [vassooos7[ [me _[uen] v _| 1 | Seok [coronas Conalé Le Restence St [5749 Nar! Tonal Paw oo [vassooose | [oa [uen| v | 1 | war _[rutetoniResdence STP +50 Egan Rood fa Stone ap [vassooron| [coum [uenl v | 1 | wae HomeRenecurRestence STP 920-6 East Stone Gan Ra lb Stone ep fvaceoors0] | we [en] vy | 1 | wae [esse RancalResdonoe STP 8 snes Holow Ross Iron jvaceoorre] [we [ten] 6 | 1 | tee |eeoken vourier Fe Deparment STP [169 Fee Hala soto [vacsoorno[ [owm [un] | 1 | Seok [amsvong Fath Rendonoe STP 77 Netigham Ra [oa cay [vasaoorzs[ [me [uenl v| 1 | War [ion GemnRestense STP [53 Homans Ra wee [vassoorza | | oam [uen| v | 1 | wae _|pcaiee catReadence STP 07 Powe Voy Ra heron [vaseoors1 ten] [1 | Seon _[Ramser kena Residence STP fis cavateror lea cry fraceoois2 ex] [1 | wae _ [Frey LouResaonce STP ota Eas Sone Gap [ba Stone Gap fvaceoorss] [ne [een] y | + | wae _issserGien Resaence STP S570 Thacker Granen Rona (Noon

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400137 O & M LEN N 1 Scott Bays Phyllis Residences STP 368 Whitetail Circle Nickelsville

VAG400147 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Owens Dennis Residence STP 3527 Manville Rd Gate City

VAG400150 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Lane Nancy Residence STP 1487 Bristol Hwy Gate City

VAG400151 MC LEN N 1 Wise Warren Associates STP 450 Orby Cantrell Hwy. Big Stone Gap

VAG400153 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Ramey Stella Residence STP 531 Mill Creek Rd Fort Blackmore

VAG400158 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Carter Jimmy and Melinda Residence STP 9284 Clinch River Hwy Fort Blackmore

VAG400159 O & M LEN N 2 Scott Roadside Mission Baptist Church STP 5084 Nickelsville Hwy Gate City

VAG400161 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Roberts David Brent Residence STP 348 Dixon Ln Gate City

VAG400162 O & M LEN N 1 Scott Rogers Douglas Q Residences STP 5294 Natural Tunnel Pkwy Duffield

VAG400166 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Rutherford Conley Residences STP 1729 Hoot Owl Hollow Road Norton

VAG400170 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Cox Sherry Residences STP 4856 Back Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400171 O & M LEN N 1 Scott Daniel Boone Office Complex STP 175 Military Lane Gate City

VAG400172 O & M LEN N 1 Scott Peters Bill and McMurray Ron Residences STP1522 Bristol Hwy Gate City

VAG400172 O&M LEN N 1 Scott Peters Bill and McMurray Ron Residences STP Gate City

VAG400187 O & M LEN Y 2 Wise Rhet John Residence STP 4202 Powell Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400197 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Paramont Contura LLC - Tom’s Creek Prep STP12303 Toms Creek Rd Coeburn

VAG400203 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Warren Frederick C Residence STP 213 Screech Owl Dr Gate City

VAG400207 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Williams Claud Residence STP 2727 Egan Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400217 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise McCoy Lester and Wendy Residence STP 9315 Hamilton Chapel Rd Pound

VAG400218 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Duncan Suzanne Residence STP 5573 Madison Road Wise

VAG400225 MC LEN N 1 Scott Harding Donald III and Brittany Residences STP5698 Yuma Rd Gate City

VAG400227 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Cheryl Residence STP 4826 Back Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400228 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Hunsaker John D Residence STP 5752 Powell Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400229 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Ison Paul R Residences STP 6308 Hurricane Road Wise

VAG400234 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Large Gary W Residence STP 5283 Clearwater Road Wise

VAG400237 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Pearce Morgan Residence STP 3101 Pattonsville Rd Duffield

VAG400240 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Jackson Kenneth L Residence STP 6923B Hurricane Road Wise

VAG400241 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Fincham Joyce Residence STP 183 Hillside Ln Duffield

VAG400243 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Porter Joseph Residence STP 4939 Pole Bridge Road Wise

VAG400244 MC LEN N 2 Scott Cochran Alan Residences STP 110 Haynes Valley Rd Gate City

VAG400246 O & M LEN N 1 Wise D & J Feed Incorporated 5428 Cranes Nest Rd Coeburn

VAG400247 O & M LEN N 1 Wise John Ring Trucking Incorporated STP 5428 Cranes Nest Rd Coeburn

VAG400250 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Shoemaker Genora Residence STP 4166 Cameron Ct Coeburn

VAG400251 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Bonham Elizabeth J Residence STP 914 Hilton Rd Gate City

VAG400252 O&M LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Bradley and Yates Amanda Residence STP6408 Redwine Rd Wise

VAG400253 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Fields Robert Residence STP 606 Orby Cantrell Hwy Big Stone Gap

VAG400254 MC LEN N 1 Wise Parsons Charles H Residence STP 6945 Hurricane Rd Wise

VAG400255 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Flatwoods Freewill Baptist Church 13064 Flatwoods Rd Coeburn

VAG400259 LEN N 2 Scott Gardners Memorial Primative Baptist

Church STP Tri-State Lime Rd Bristol

VAG400260 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Yeary Patrick W Residence STP 9219B Percy Road Wise

VAG400262 MC LEN N 1 Lee Boones LLC STP 1982 Wilderness Rd Ewing

VAG400263 LEN Y 1 Wise Sheldon Garrett Residence STP 5923 Stone Creek Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400268 LEN N 1 Wise Savage Services Corp STP 3701 Russell Creek Rd. St. Paul

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey frscaooar] | oaw [uen] w [1 | Sat [oop rnpanroccons ST es wcrc Inaonae frscaorar] | we [uen| y[ 1 | Seat [Owens bom Resene S sar nano ose oy frscaoisol | omw [ven] y | + | seat [nonin restonen ste fia en es oy fescaorss | [me [uew] w 1 | wae [warenasocut sve [0 oy canniny, ba sve can aceon] | oam [uen] vy | 1 | Seon [Ramey Sto Reseree 1? st Geek rota [scant] | oam [ven] v | 1 | Seon [oonerdrmy andra Rendon STP [oa Cinch River Fotaicinoe [rscaoiso] | onw [cen] w | 2 | Seat [pose msson anther [084 che uy ose cy [rscaoier] | onw [cen] y | 1 | seot [posorsonndtion Restore TP [8 Doontn ow oy [rscaoiea] | onw [cen] w | 1 | set [Reno oainen Greniona STP [sot hava Tool Pewy own [rscaoores | ow [uew] w | 1 | wae [ruterorsconnyResdercesstP _[ira0 vow Owhokow Rod —[Nonen lacaooi7o| | oam [ven] _n | 1 | woe [Corsten Residences sTP sean vay Rona base con {wowoirs| | oam [ven] n | 1 | scot [bonaloone once ConpesstP 176 aytane les cny [imerora] | omw [cen] w | 1 | seat [room nana nin RonRetorcs S22 Bh ose cy [rscwoira] | cam [cen] w | 1 | seat [pone bana nay Ron Reteres STP ew oy [rscaorer] | mw [cen] y | 2 | wow [eteaonnRescono str [202 Powe voy Road ba Seneca [rscaorer] | mm [uew] w | 1 | wae [ruamon cone Lc Tone GnekPep {209 Toms Gok Ra essen lacaooaes| | oam [ven] vy | 1 | Seon wen Fesck Renee ST? _[e10 SaeecOtOr om ony {wcwooaor] | oam [ven] v | 1 | woe fmane Gad Residence STP rar coon non be ove cap [rscaosi7[ | omm [ten] y | + | wae [Meter tener ars Wendy Rencerc SP [16 anton Chapa Ra ood [rscaozie| | omw [cen] y | 1 | wee [omean sumo Restore TP [870 Nadhon Road Ie [rscaozas| | we [cen] w | 1 | seo mana oon nan ity Reso 008 Ya Rd ewe cy frsczonar] | mw [uew] v1 | wae [oan cnnp Resco sm sank voy ow ba Seneca lxcaooaze| [wo [ven] vy | 1 | wee soem 0 Reseos STP [ote Powe vate Road baste con [sca] | oam [ven] | 1 | Woe [eonPaatReaese STP 08 can Road se [rscaonzse] | nw [cen] y [1 | Woe [inge ay Reso STP 88 Gara Rood ie [rscaonzar] | omw [uew] y | 1 | Seat [pene npn Reson SP ior Potro Ra owen frncaoaso] [we [cen] y [1 | wee [ictenvowetResdone sve [208 nano Rone ne frsczoaer| | we [urn] v1 | seat [Feaamsoyc Renee sth fearon owe Jacaaoaes] | wo [ven] v | 1 | woe [poner dseph Reser STP oe Pa rag Rona we [wcaooase| [wo [ven] w | 2 | Seon [Oocwan An Resences TP Hayes vay Ra one cy [rscaoaee] | onw [cen] w [1 | Woe [pavrewdmcomoniea 28 canes nota eosoom [rscaoae7] | onm [cen] w [1 | Woo omnng ocingincwomed sve [20 Cones sina = frscaoaso] | ow [ven] y | 1 | wae [etoonoserGonra Reade sre [00 cana eesoon [rscaonasr| | omm [urn] y | 1 | seot [oomameuatenanendona st [ve ton es oy {acaooase| | ouw [ven] vy | 1 | woe _ pun tadey ond Ys Anand Reatnt08 Ravn Re se [wcwooass| | oam [uen| v | 1 | woe [pas naben Reser SP es oy Coney ba Seve cap [rscaonase] | wo [cen] w | 1 | woe [Panow Chaos tRosdenee STP [ots uncanoRa le frscaonass] | nw [cen] w | 1 | Woo [Rens FeonitvtsCnach [004 Fatoaio Rd eosoon Come cen] 6 [2 | sau [Sates one Pimaie Baie Tree Ra oe frnczonaeol [we [urn] y| 1 | wae freayPavexw Reser SP aren Pry Roa Ie lxcaooasz| [wo [ven] w | 1 | tee [oooesuicste fouz wnseness a ewe [aceanas ten] y[ + | wee [Stetion covet Rendon STP 23 Sone Cee a a ve can [rscaonae cen] w [+ | wee Savage Sonics cop aT 01 Rise Geo a cpa

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400270 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Sturgill Randall L Residence STP 6338 Redwine Rd Wise

VAG400275 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Boring Daniel and Jenifer Residence STP 4832 Back Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400281 MC LEN Y 2 Wise Tate Barry N Residence STP 863 Elk Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400282 O & M LEN Y 1 Scott Holland Richard Residence STP 154 Thorngrove Dr Duffield

VAG400283 X MC LEN Y 1 Wise Elkins Amy G Residence STP 2732 Egan Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400285 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Appalachia Traditions, Inc. 6034 Kent Junction Rd Norton

VAG400292 LEN Y 1 Wise Freeman Anita 7125 Residence STP 7125 Rocky Fork Rd Wise

VAG400293 LEN Y 1 Wise Freeman Anita 7121 Residence STP 7121 Rocky Fork Rd Wise

VAG400294 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Martin Bruce Residence STP 5932 Carroll Road Coeburn

VAG400300 LEN Y 1 Wise Couch Sandra Residence STP 12922 Banner Rd Coeburn

VAG400301 O&M LEN N 1 Wise Reaching Up Reaching Higher Christian Church5738 Cranesnest Road Coeburn

VAG400305 LEN Y 1 Wise Couch Lois Residence STP 4785 Kennedy Rd Coeburn

VAG400310 MC LEN N 1 Scott Lemly and Wolfe Residences 9721 Clinch River Hwy Fort Blackmore

VAG400323 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Presley Justin Residence STP 5901 Guest River Road Norton

VAG400325 LEN Y 1 Scott DeWitt Amanda Residence STP 208 Cabin Dr Blackwater

VAG400332 O&M LEN N 1 Scott Lane Rentals STP 5911 Daniel Boone Rd Gate City

VAG400333 O & M LEN N 1 Scott Heritage Baptist Church 5102 Bristol Hwy Ste 101 Gate City

VAG400334 LEN Y 1 Wise Kopp James and Michelle Residence STP 6005 Powell Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400341 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Masters Billy Ray Residence STP 9737 Turkey Branch Rd Wise

VAG400343 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Jason & Bobbi Residence STP 9607 Turkey Branch Rd Wise

VAG400347 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Mitchell Jerome W Residence STP 1910 East Stone Gap Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400348 LEN Y 1 Wise Craiger Tony Residence STP 8603 Harvey Road Wise

VAG400350 X NB LEN Y 1 Scott Osborne Caterina Residence STP 7333 River Bluff Rd Fort Blackmore

VAG400353 X NB LEN Y 1 Wise B. F. Robinette Contractor Residence SFH STPState Route 610 Big Stone Gap

VAG400354 O & M LEN N 2 Scott Copper Creek Community Church Ruritan Run Rd Gate City

VAG400355 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Young Marion E and Dorland Ryan Residences STP5822 Powell Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400357 O&M LEN Y 1 Wise Waggoner Paul & Rita Residence STP 4530 Crawford Rd Coeburn

VAG400359 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Strouth Johnny Residence STP 15900 Flags Road Coeburn

VAG400362 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Bright Joe and Blanche Residence STP 4946 Barrowman Rd Coeburn

VAG400366 O & M LEN N 1 Scott Rally Mart, Inc. STP 91 Second St Hiltons

VAG400368 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Sturgill Laura and David Residence STP 10085 Bear Fork Road Pound

VAG400370 MC LEN N 1 Wise Mullins James F Residences STP 10105 Green Hollow Rd Wise

VAG400373 LEN Y 1 Wise Phipps Bryan & Bella Residence STP 5838 Powell Valley Rd Big Sonte Gap

VAG400374 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Lawson Johnathan and Charissa Residence STP2106 Exeter Road Appalachia

VAG400375 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Ramsey Charlie Residence STP 9901 Turkey Branch Rd Wise

VAG400376 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Ramsey Charlie Residence 2 STP 9903 Turkey Branch Rd Wise

VAG400379 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Travelers Motel STP 10232 Orby Cantrell Highway Pound

VAG400381 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Smith Johnny Wayne Residence STP 193 War Lance Dr Nickelsville

VAG400383 MC LEN N 1 Wise Thomas Amanda Residence and Imboden United Community Church STP2104 Exeter Rd Appalachia

VAG400387 LEN N 1 Wise Marshall Residences STP 3931 Russell Creek Road St. Paul

VAG400389 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Fox Shirley Residence STP 5936 Powell Valley Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400390 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Burke Donald Ray Residence STP 5818 Carroll Road Coeburn

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400392 MC LEN N 1 Wise Greater Wise Inc. Office STP 6999 Polk Rd Norton

VAG400393 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Martin Bruce & Joyce Residence STP 12041 Floyd Road Coeburn

VAG400394 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Killion Don & Phyllis Residence STP 6240 Hurricane Rd Wise

VAG400395 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Powell Valley Memorial Gardens STP 5650 Powell Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400399 O&M LEN Y 1 Wise Scott Stuart Residence STP 9810 Turkey Branch Rd Wise

VAG400416 LEN Y 1 Wise Williams Samuel H Residence SFH STP 3841 Honey Branch Rd St. Paul

VAG400417 X LEN Y 1 Wise Underwood Robert Residence STP 7202 Hopkins Farm Rd Wise

VAG400418 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Hall Charles N Residence SFH STP 12244 Carolina Rd Coeburn

VAG400419 MC LEN N 1 Wise Salyers Jamie Residences STP 5734 Carroll Rd Coeburn

VAG400423 LEN Y 1 Wise Calton Terry Residence STP 6228 Hurricane Rd Wise

VAG400424 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Ward George Residence STP 10210 Green Hollow Rd Wise

VAG400429 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Hamilton John douglas Jr Residence STP 4820 Back Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400432 O&M LEN Y 1 Wise Gilliam Judith B Residence STP 2800 Egan Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400433 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Dotson Melissa R Residence STP 226 Little League Rd Coeburn

VAG400438 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Caldwell Brian Residence STP 6991 Dotson Creek Rd Wise

VAG400442 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Lawson Delmas R Residence SFH STP 7041 Orby Cantrell Hwy Pound

VAG400446 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Shepherd Travis E Residence STP 6224 Hurricane Rd Wise

VAG400448 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Bowen Billy T and Michelle Residence STP 128 Windcrest Dr Duffield

VAG400449 NB LEN N 1 Wise Fleming Jackie Residences STP 8620 and 8612 Hoover Rd Wise

VAG400450 LEN Y 1 Wise Killen Bill Residence STP 8605 Marigold Road Wise

VAG400457 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Couch Dale Residence STP 4930 Barrowman Road Coeburn

VAG400459 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Lane Reggie Residence STP 13106 Clinch River Hwy Ft. Blackmore

VAG400462 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Cassell Billy Residence STP 5931 Powell Valley Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400467 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Boyd Jackie Residence STP 4928 Barrowman Road Coeburn

VAG400468 MC LEN Y 1 Wise McCoy Ivory and Judy Residence STP 3517 Honey Branch Rd St. Paul

VAG400469 LEN Y 1 Wise Smith J W Residence STP 6631 Old Hurricane Rd Wise

VAG400470 LEN Y 1 Wise Hamilton Christy Residence STP 2818 Egan Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400471 O & M LEN N 1 Wise Collier Virginia Residences STP 6814 Prince George Rd Wise

VAG400472 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Bevins William Residence STP 6910 Hurricane Road Wise

VAG400474 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Jacobs Gary W and Diane Residence STP 3529 Hardy Hollow Road St. Paul

VAG400477 O&M LEN Y 1 Wise Richardson Jamey and Sandra Residence STP1425 Wildcat Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400486 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Paul Residence STP 8974 Bean Gap Road Pound

VAG400494 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Roberts Bobby Residence STP 7506 Truman Rd Norton

VAG400495 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Maggard Jimmy and Hope Residence STP 10110 Green Hollow Rd Wise

VAG400496 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Meade Michael Residence STP 10215 Baker - Meade Rd Pound

VAG400497 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Hughes Jason Residence SFH STP Adjacent to 7501 Big Branch Rd Pound

VAG400505 MC LEN N 1 Wise Marr William and Karen Residences STP 5200 Dorchester Rd Norton

VAG400508 LEN N 1 Wise Johnson Melinda Residences STP 13527 Toms Creek Rd Coeburn

VAG400514 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Holden Edward V Residence STP 120 Desoto Dr Duffield

VAG400523 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Owens Dwight H and Tammy D Residence STP10237 Green Hollow Rd Wise

VAG400524 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Tiller Chris and Michelle STP 6521 Gilliam Rd Wise

VAG400528 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Hunter Randall D Residence STP 290 Kaylors Chapel Ln Duffield

VAG400530 LEN Y 1 Wise Gilliam Residence and Kennel STP 2800 Egan Road Big Stone Gap

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [ractooore] [we [ven] | + | wae _[owarsoine Once ste verona ‘atom [ractooass] | we [ven] v | + | wae nance lore nesionmstm [12041 Fy Rona Jooeton jractooase] | me _[uen] vy | + | wee [esonoovarnyssResience stm [atone Ra le [vaccooss]| | o@m [ven] | + | wae [Powetvateynorai Garena STP [S650 Poel Vey Ras lee Sore cen lcscoosee] | ouw [cen] vy | 1 | wae [soos esdone sth ero Trey Banca le coon cen] [1 | wae _ tone Same Rendon srw are fin Honey nck Ra Is Po [vacaoorr7 |X ten] vy [+ | wae _|Undenood Roten Residence STP {7202 Hopkins Farm Ra wise fractoorre] | ne [ven] v | + | wae [Hatcharesnnesionesrnsre [rene Cooina Ra = [racists] | me _[uen] w+ | woe [Saber amie Resins ste 28 carat a [vaccooezs ten] —y [1 | wae _[satn tor Rescore ste ze rca a le fescsooze] | oam [cen] vy | 1 | Wie |adGaogeRentnce STP fo2t0 Geen How a lice [vcsooiae] | we [cen] vy _| 1 | wae _iartonsohn dougie rRestence STP [18208ock Vato Rona be Sore Gap [ractoosse] | oam [uen] | + | wee [osama Resience Ste P00 eae Rows Ibe Sore Gop [ractoosss] | o@m [uen] | + | wow [OconnosenResdence Te [e20 io cap Ra = [actos] | om [uen] | + | wae _[entnntsonResdence ste sot ooo rou be [vactoosez| [we [ven] vy | + | wae [lamovbemas Reson SrHSTP [att ory Gane ny ene frsczoows] | me [ven] y | 1 | wae [sephew Tavee Restonce sve as rurcaona le lvcoowa| | we [cen] vy _| + | swt [boven TandMchata Renee 1? [128 Woes Or owe jvactoosss] [ne [ven] _w | 1 | wae _ RerinyJocenesenes STP oan 572 Hoover le [ractooaso cen] [+ | wae _ ton Reston StF ons waren Rons bse fractossr] | o@m [uen] | + | wae [omchoae nesters STP [sao Browman Reed = jractosse] | me _[uen] | + | seo [laneRegpe Resierce sve fatee crn very <— [vactoose| [ve [ven] vy + | wae [ester oiyReserce ste st Pow vats Re leader cen lescsooer] | onm [cen] vy | 1 | wae [yl dco Reninc STP ls arowman Ros occu frceootse] | me [cen] vy _| + | wae _ietoy waryena ay Ressene SP [ist Honey nen Ra Is Po [ractoaee cen] [1 | wae _[Snah Jw Retene STP eet on arco Ra be [ractorra cen] + [1 | wae parton Crs Restince ste ‘esteem <7 [ractoorrs| | o@m [uen] | + | woe _[ootervignia reson STe terns Gone Ra bse [vactoosre| [ve [ven] vy _| + | woe [owvrawaam Restence SP sro Heane Rona le fesczoore] | we [cen] vy | 1 | wae [nco Gary w andaneResdene Sv [p20 Far How Road Pa [escaooer7| | on [cen] vy _| + | wae _|Rctaison Janey and Sei Resdence 5 wha Ra be Sore Gop [ractoosse] | we [ven] v | + | wae _aneraaRestence stp ra sean Gap Ron = [ractoosse] | o@m [uen] | + | woo [rotersoctty Reston ST 06 romana atom [vactooss| [onm [uen] | + | wow isons ammy and Hoe Resserce STP [j0110 Goon Holow Ra le [vactooss] | o@m [ven] vy _| + | wae [ease nenas Renton St zt Boer-Meade na ene fisceorsr] | na _[oen] vy | + | Wee egos sonRstonce SrHS1P [adeno 7501 Barend Pound jscsoosos] | we [cen] _» | 1 | wae _parwam and karen Resinces STP _[ie00DosheserRa enon [racoosoe en] 6 [1 | wae [treo Resitrces st [127 Toms Ook Ra oot [ractoosre] |e _[uen] vy _| + | scot [povontavoavRestence ste [0 bmroo Or oui [ractosza| | ne [ven] | + | wae [ovens oman an-Tarmy Rested 0207 Goon ow Ra be [vactosze] [ve [ven] | + | wae _friercwnanotacete str esa cam a lice jrceoosas]| | ve [een] y | 1 | sat |imerRandaiOReskence sve fdwayor Chaplin lune lacsooss0 cen] [+ | wae [estar esteceandkeret st? [e00 an ond lb Sore Gop

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400536 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Roop Jason Residence STP 5815 Starnes Rd Coeburn

VAG400541 MC LEN N 1 Wise Ballard Linda Residences STP 6801 Goochland Rd Wise

VAG400543 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Jackson Jamie G Residence STP 5284 Bear Creek Rd Norton

VAG400552 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Johnson Jeffrey Lee Residence STP 256 Little League Rd Coeburn

VAG400554 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Durham Sarah Residence STP 175 Sarah Circle Gate City

VAG400556 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Kerns Tommy Residence STP 7623 S Fork Rd Pound

VAG400560 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Phillips Karen Residence STP Bristol Hwy Bristol

VAG400562 MC LEN N 1 Scott Hilton Residences STP 325 Fairview Rd Duffield

VAG400577 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Dunford Eddie and Leaschia Residence STP 4932 Sinking Creek Hwy Dungannon

VAG400582 LEN Y 1 Scott McClain Charlene Residence 2 STP 14705 Yuma Rd Gate City

VAG400584 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Cline Jimmy Residence STP 254 Nightingale Dr Gate City

VAG400592 LEN Y 1 Wise Branham Tommy Residence STP 10500 Killen Hollow Rd Pound

VAG400593 O & M LEN Y 1 Wise Rumley Lewis Residence STP 140 Elm Ave NE Coeburn

VAG400595 LEN Y 1 Wise Stapleton Phyllis Residence STP 9612 Bold Camp Rd Pound

VAG400599 MC LEN Y 1 Scott McClain Charlene Residence STP 14653 Yuma Rd Gate City

VAG400601 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Egan William D and Patricia Residence STP 5726 Powell Valley Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400602 LEN Y 1 Scott Johnson Richard Residence STP 1150 Cove Creek Mine Ln Duffield

VAG400603 LEN Y 1 Wise Addington Bob A Residence STP 11319 Old Norton Coeburn Rd Coeburn

VAG400607 LEN Y 1 Scott McMurray Kimberly Residence STP 195 Bow Dr Gate City

VAG400617 LEN Y 1 Wise Parton Glen and Irene Residence STP 8635 Taft Rd Wise

VAG400631 MC LEN N 1 Wise Lauterbauh Betty Residences STP 3910 Dungannon Rd Coeburn

VAG400633 LEN Y 1 Wise Meade Glen and Anna Residence STP 10428 Killen Hollow Rd Pound

VAG400640 LEN Y 2 Wise Culbertson Bucky Residence STP 5956 Powell River Road Wise

VAG400642 LEN Y 1 Wise Lawson Randall and Allison Residence STP 4118 Powell Valley Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400645 LEN Y 1 Scott Clark Teresa Residence STP 714 Old Quarry Dr Nickelsville

VAG400649 LEN Y 1 Wise Ramsey Charlie Residence 3 STP 9807 Turkey Branch Rd Wise

VAG400650 LEN Y 1 Scott Quillen Keith Residence STP 4872 Daniel Boone Rd Gate City

VAG400651 LEN Y 1 Scott McKinney Teresa Rhea Residence STP 294 Jay Hollow Dr Duffield

VAG400656 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Dingus Wendell Residence STP 10129E White Oak Rd Wise

VAG400659 LEN Y 1 Wise Countiss Michael and Sydney Residence STP8226 Gilliam Hollow Road Pound

VAG400666 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Greene William R and Charlene Residence STP12732 Mosswood Ln Coeburn

VAG400670 MC LEN Y 1 Wise Baker Connie Residence STP 1904 East Stone Gap Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400671 LEN Y 1 Wise Graham John & Sue Residence SFH STP 5515 Freeman Rd Wise

VAG400676 LEN N 1 Scott Dorton Bonnie Residences STP 1615 Fairview Rd Duffield

VAG400683 LEN Y 2 Scott Detjen William and Scarlet Residence STP 727 Waters Edge Road Duffield

VAG400685 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Wilson Chadwick W Residence STP 1810 East Stone Gap Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400696 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Jordan Leslie & Betty Residence 251 Little League Rd Coeburn

VAG400701 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Wyatt Joel Residence STP 248 Little League Rd Coeburn

VAG400705 LEN Y 2 Scott Bays Della Residence STP 849 Slabtown Circle Gate City

VAG400711 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Chandler John M and Shirley Residence STP5113 Chandler Rd Wise Co

VAG400715 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Lawson Judy Ann Residence STP 6309 Little Dipper Rd Wise Co

VAG400719 NB LEN N 1 Wise Hill Bobby W Residences STP 3311 Russell Creek Rd St. Paul

VAG400720 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Pickett Kenneth W Residence STP 273 Little League Rd Coeburn

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400722 NB LEN N 1 Wise Happy Hearts Day Care STP 711 Orby Cantrell Hwy Big Stone Gap

VAG400724 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Tate Ronnie W and Judy M Residence STP 15525 Frog Pond Rd St. Paul

VAG400726 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Carroll Larry Residence STP 3243 Russell Creek Road St. Paul

VAG400736 LEN Y 1 Wise Stallard Katherine Residence STP 3512 Labrador Rd. Coeburn

VAG400738 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Scott Wendy B Residence STP 9216 Yardley Rd Wise

VAG400739 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Hobbs George and Phyllis Residence STP 6233 Canton Rd Blackwater

VAG400740 NB LEN N 1 Wise Whitaker Donna Residences STP 10540 Camby Ln Wise

VAG400742 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Sherron Hugh Residence STP 582 McDowell Branch Ln Ft Blackmore

VAG400746 MC LEN Y 1 Scott Hartsock Douglas Residence STP 4608 Sinking Creek Hwy Dungannon

VAG400748 X NB LEN Y 1 Wise Baugh James C Residence STP 2301 Egan Road Big Stone Gap

VAG400771 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Stewart Andrea M Residence STP 7198 Hopkins Farm Rd Wise

VAG400774 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Marsingill Seth Residence STP 9808 Cochise Rd Pound

VAG400775 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Collett Roger Residence STP 2221 Falls Creek Rd Dungannon

VAG400778 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Burnham Joshua and Brandi Residence STP9347 Covington Rd Pound

VAG400789 LEN Y 1 Wise Elkins James Residence STP 7782 South Fork Rd Pound

VAG400792 LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Donald and Ginger Residence STP 7916 Cransnest Rd Coeburn

VAG400793 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Shortt Dalton and Candida Residence STP 15502 Frog Pond Rd St. Paul

VAG400799 LEN Y 1 Scott Darnell Justin Residence STP 13974 Hunters Valley West Rd Duffield

VAG400803 MC LEN N 1 Wise Diversified Southern Midstream LLC - Butcher Fork STP2452 Preston Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400815 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Marcum Colton Residence STP 920 Smith Hollow Ln Gate City

VAG400827 x LEN Y 1 Wise Strouth Eric Residence STP 5424 Rock Bar Rd Wise

VAG400831 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Stidham Robert A Residence STP 10015 Ferbie Rd Pound

VAG400833 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Peters Bobby and Sue Residence STP 2112 Inthepines Circle Dungannon

VAG400834 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Slemp Courtney Residence STP 10325 Prestige Rd Pound

VAG400842 LEN Y 1 Wise Jackson Thomas Jr Residence STP 13425 Grayson Rd. Coeburn

VAG400856 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Martin Russell Residence STP 5832 Carroll Rd St Paul

VAG400857 MC LEN N 1 Wise Adkins Casey and Cox Orange Lee Residences STP9927 Miller Hollow Rd Wise

VAG400860 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Murdock Vickie Residence STP 13182 Clinch River Hwy Ft Blackmore

VAG400868 MC LEN N 1 Wise Calvary Baptist Church STP 6946 South Fork Rd Pound

VAG400875 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Raleigh Steven Residence STP 3503 Goldleaf Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400878 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Slemp Gary Residence STP 14108 Dry Fork Rd Coeburn

VAG400879 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Addair Elizabeth Residence STP 9914 Coeburn Mtn Rd Wise

VAG400880 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Carter Kentra Lee 6109 Lake Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400881 NB LEN N 1 Wise Mabe Josh and Lauren Residences STP 7247 Duncan Gap Rd Wise

VAG400885 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Collins Gerald D Site 1 Residence STP Scott Roberson Rd Wise

VAG400886 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Collins Gerald D Site 2 Residence STP Scott Roberson Rd Wise

VAG400910 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Carter Paul G Residence STP GG Two Angels Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400923 LEN Y 1 Scott Winegar Kevin W Residence STP 2096 Apple Orchard Rd Gate City

VAG400935 LEN N 1 Wise Savage Services Corp - Virginia City STP 3630 Russell Creek Rd St Paul

VAG400939 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Green Kathy Residence STP 5336 Tacoma Mtn Rd Wise

VAG400941 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Ramsey Charlie Residence 4 STP 9913 Turkey Branch Rd Wise

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400949 LEN Y 1 Wise Caudill Kenneth Residence STP 3101 Brooks Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG400958 NB LEN Y 1 Wise O’Quinn Eddie Residence STP 9542 Candace Dr Wise

VAG400959 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Branham Donald Residence STP 11307 Robinson Hollow Rd Coeburn

VAG400962 NB LEN Y 1 Lee Davidson Lester G Residence STP 12707 St Rte 606 Keokee

VAG400965 LEN Y 1 Scott Hilton’s Rental Property Residence STP 883 Manville Rd Gate City

VAG400985 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Gilliam Justin Residence STP 5400 Canton Rd Blackwater

VAG400988 x NB LEN Y 1 Wise Spears Beau Residence STP 6115 Lake Rd Norton

VAG400991 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Quillen James D Residence STP 949 A. P. Carter Hwy Hiltons

VAG400992 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Barnette Chris Residence STP 5130 Thackers Branch Rd Norton

VAG400998 MC LEN N 1 Lee Lone Mountain Plant Bathhouse Treatment Unit2778 Monarch Rd St. Charles

VAG409002 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Gotts Doris L Residence STP 2455 Natural Tunnel Pkwy Duffield

VAG409005 NB LEN N 1 Scott Hughes Richard W and Gregory A Residences STP4986 Sinking Creek Hwy Dungannon

VAG409019 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Miller Dewey and Betty Residence STP 2485 Natural Tunnel Pkwy Duffield

VAG409023 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Turner Sandra Residence STP 180 Emerald Valley Circle Gate City

VAG409027 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Fleming Noelle C and Stanford Jr. Residence STP10134 Fairground Rd Wise

VAG409034 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Hicks Glenna M Residence STP 3990 Nansemond Rd Coeburn

VAG409041 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Glass Gregory and Regina Residence STP 2150 Wadlow Gap Rd Gate City

VAG409046 LEN N 1 Scott Scott County Animal Shelter STP 184 Single Tree Rd Gate City

VAG409049 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Templeton Joseph Residence STP 3178 River Bluff Rd Fort Blackmore

VAG409054 NB LEN N 1 Wise Wise Rentals STP Taft Rd Wise

VAG409057 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Secretary of Housing and Urban Development STP1230 McDowell Branch Ln Scott County

VAG409059 NB LEN N 1 Wise Lawson Terri Residences STP 7908 Carter Branch Rd Wise

VAG409061 NB LEN N 1 Wise Hilton Larry Residences STP 8132 Scott Roberson Hollow Wise

VAG409062 X NB LEN N 1 Wise Kiser Luke Residences STP 5125 Tacoma Mountain Rd Wise

VAG409067 NB LEN N 1 Scott McCloud Jeffery Residences STP 105 and 107 Florida Dr Gate City

VAG409076 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Bolling Jonathan and Candace Residence STP 15227 Tacoma Mountain Rd Wise

VAG409079 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Collins William MacClay Residence STP 4395 Sinking Creek Hwy Dungannon

VAG409080 LEN N 1 Scott Jennings Apartment STP 1281 Lucy Rd Gate City

VAG409089 MC LEN N 1 Wise Hartless and Carter Residences STP 9542 Coeburn Mountain Rd Wise County

VAG409090 X NB LEN Y 1 Wise Starnes Christopher Residence STP 5542 Burwell Rd Wise

VAG409095 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Baker Zachery and Taylor Residence STP Pine Branch Rd Coeburn

VAG409096 NB LEN N 1 Lee Keokee Community Center STP 13719 State Rte 606 Keokee

VAG409099 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Darnell Teddy Residence STP Mandolin Dr Hiltons

VAG409103 LEN N 1 Lee Dollar General Store - Wheeling Community STP152 Wheeler Rd Ewing

VAG409106 NB LEN Y 1 Wise Dotson Millard Residence STP 8008 Cranes Nest Rd Coeburn

VAG409108 LEN Y 1 Wise Harris Patricia Residence STP 4844 Back Valley Rd Big Stone Gap

VAG409112 LEN Y 1 Scott Gibbs Jerry and Amanda Residence STP 9160 Hunters Valley West Rd Duffield

VAG409113 LEN N 1 Lee New River Hardwoods STP 277 Old Quarry Rd Ewing

VAG409114 LEN Y 1 Wise Blair Tammy Residence STP 5257A Tacoma Mtn Rd Wise

VAG409115 x LEN Y 1 Wise Hernan Mary E Residence STP 10413 Viking Rd Pound

VAG409117 LEN Y 1 Wise Baker Sharon Residence STP 8633 Hoover Rd Wise

VAG409129 NB LEN Y 1 Scott Laney Bobby D Residence STP 4787 Hanging Rock Pkwy Dungannon

VAG409134 LEN Y 1 Wise Hall Melvin Residence STP 8201 Birchfield Rd Wise

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [vacaoons en] y [1 | wee _[cauan Kennet Resence STP 10ers et lou Stone Gap [vacaoosse| | ne [ven] v | + | wae [ocumeade Residence s12 Candace Or co [vacacosso| | no [ven] vy | + | wae _[erannam Dona Residence STP 1207 Robinson Hotow Ra costs [vacoossz| | ne [een] v | + | tee [oavdsonteserGReswence STP [12707 SiR 606 leone fraceoooes ten] _y | 1 | scot [pons Renta Propery Residence STP [ons Manve Ra [eae ory fraceoooes| [ne [een] vy | + | sean [onam stn Resence STP [00 canton Ra lascova [vacaoosee|q | ne [uen| vy | + | wae [Spear Geau Resdnce STP [oris take Ra Jnoton Jvacaoossr| [ne [ven] v | + | soon [aumn demos. Residence STP [oA P Caner = [vacacossa| | no [ven] | + | wae _[Bamote Cws Residence STP 5120 acer Branch Ra JNonon [vacaoosse| [| mc [een] nN | + | tee _llone mountain Plant Bannouse Teamen [2778 Monarch Ra ls onrer jraceooooe] | ne [een] vy | + | Seon foots Donel Restence st 455 Nata Tune Pay outa [vaceosoos] [ne [ven] _w | + | Seat _[puones Rena and Gregan A ResaoneG86 Snkng Geo Hwy [sngennen [vacaosare] | na [ten] v | + | soot fiterOeweyand Bey Rosdance STP [2485 Natura Tunnel Py out [vacaoseza] | ne [ven] v | + | Soot |TumerSanca Residence STP foo Emer Vatny Gro [one cry [vacaosear| | no [ven] | + | wae [Femina Hoot Cand Stntortir Ressenc] 10194 Farground Ra wee [vacaosose| | ne [ven] v | + | wae [Heks Geonam Residence STP sco Nansemond Re cocoa fraceoooes| | ne [ven] vy | + | Seon [ase Gregory and Regn Residence STP [2160 Wadow Gap Ra [eae ory fraceooons ten] 6 [1 | seat [seen couny Animal Star STP fet Single Tee Re [eae Gry [vacsooowo | [we [cen] v[ 1 | Seon [TemponsosephRendence STP (178 RverBuRe Fon ick [vacaosese| [ne [ven] | + | wae [wee Reriae srr [rata wee [vacaososr| | no [ven] v | + | soot _|Secean or ova and urban Oeveonme] 1290 McDowel Branch Ln Seon County [vacaosose| | no [een] n | + | wae [lawson TenRestences STP soe canter Benen Re jwise jvaceoooss| | we [een] w | + | wae [rtontary Resdences STP a [vxcaonosa|X| na [uen| | + | wee [eerLike Reednces STP [25 Tecoma Mourn Ra wise |vacaoseer| [na [ten] nw | + | soot icin sty Resenoos STP fos and 107 Pena Or [one cry |vacaosare| [na _[uen| | + | we [Boing onatan and Candace Residence {5227 Tacoma Mourn Rd co [vacaosore] | no [ven] v | + | Soon [Connewnamaccay Resence STP [4995 Snking rex Hwy oo, [vacsosoe0 en] 6 [+ | scot _[iemnngs Aparment STP 26 wey [cate cxy fvaceoooee] | me [ven] w | + | wae anes and CanerResitences STP _|est2 Coebum Mounan Ra lee Gouny [vacoseso |X| ne _[uen| vy | + | wise [Stes Gmstpher Residence STP (ss2 fuel Rd twee [vacaosess| | na [ten] v _| + | wae [BoterZacher and TayorResance STP [ina Branch Ra [ost [vacaosese] | ne [ten] w | + | tow _Reokee Communty Contr STP fa7¥9 state rie 000 Keone [vacaosose| | no [een] v | + | soot _[Oamen teaay Residence SP Iandoin or = [vacsostoa ten] 6 [+ | tee [potar Genera Stor -Wheeing Communi [152 Whee Ra leno fraceooros] | neuen] vy | + | wae [octonniara Restence STP boc cranes nes Ra coetum fraceoai08 en] y [1 | wae [Hare Patica Resitnce STP [see Back vay Re lag Stone Gap [vacaostia tex] _y [1 | seat [ee sry and Amanda Resance STP [e160 Hunter Vatey West Re [outa [vacaostia ten] Ww [1 | tee |pewrverHortnoods STP br 01 Guan Ra en [vacaosrte ten] ¥ [1 | wee [ose tammy Rescence ste 52676 Toman Re wee [vacaooit6 |x en] ¥[ 1 | wee _|peman nay Resaenee STP frosts viking Ra puna fvaceoost7 ten] _y [1 | wee [eater snaron Restence St bes Hoover Ra wise jvaceoorao] [we [een] vy | + | Seon [Lay Rotty 0 Rescence SP [737 Hanging Rock Per [sngsnnen [vacaontee en] y [1 | wee [panei Resence STP 20 aren Ra wee

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG409141 LEN Y 1 Wise Sturgill Willie Residence STP Redwine Rd Wise

VAG409145 LEN Y 1 Scott Barnette April Residence STP 173 Robinette Valley Rd Duffield

VAG409160 LEN Y 1 Wise Ramsey Charlie Residence 5 STP St Rt 680 Wise County

VAG409161 LEN Y 1 Wise Vanover Jimmie Residence STP 8314 Gilliam Hollow Wise County

VAG409164 LEN Y 1 Scott Lane Richard R Residence STP Patriot Dr Scott County

VAG409165 LEN Y 1 Scott Harding Donald III and Brittany SFH Residence STPYuma Rd Scott County

VAG409166 LEN Y 1 Wise Powers Isaac Residence STP Duck Camp Rd Wise County

VAG409167 LEN Y 1 Wise Epling Talena C Residence STP St Rt 634 Wise County

VAG409168 LEN Y 1 Wise Stanley Nicholas Residence STP St Rt 640 Wise County

VAG409169 LEN Y 1 Wise Robinson Marty Residence STP 8650 Robinson Hills Rd Wise County

VAG409170 LEN Y 1 Scott Schriber Kathleen Residence STP 190 Morris Dr Gate City

VAG409171 LEN N 1 Lee Carter Charles A Residences STP ST Rt 611 Lee County

VAG409173 LEN Y 1 Wise Calton Jack and Crabtree Stanley Residences STP5535 and 5613 Pole Bridge Rd Wise County

VAG409173 LEN Y 1 Wise Calton Jack and Crabtree Stanley Residences STP

VAG409174 LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Jeffrey N Residence STP Chipmunk Dr Pound

VAG409176 LEN Y 1 Wise Watkins Tim Residence STP Off St Rt 609 Wise County

VAG409179 MC LEN N 1 Wise Cornerstone Trailer Park STP 160 Cornerstone Dr Wise County

VAG409181 LEN N 1 Scott Hilton Depot STP 120 A.P. Carter Hwy Scott County

VAG409193 LEN Y 1 Wise Meade Shirley Residence STP 11428 Meade Fork Rd Pound

VAG409195 LEN N 1 Wise Bryant Group Home STP 11215 Old Norton Coeburn Rd Coeburn

VAG409197 LEN Y 1 Wise Patton Bradley Patton Residence STP Lower Russell Creek Rd St Paul

VAG409198 LEN Y 1 Wise Mullins Andrew Residence STP Rt 72 Coeburn

VAG409206 LEN Y 1 Dickenson Rockhouse STP 3396 Rockhouse Rd Coeburn

VAG409208 LEN Y 1 Wise Hamilton Bradley Residence STP TBD Wise

VAG409209 LEN Y 1 Wise Hawkins Raymond Residence STP 8316 Chaho Rd Coeburn

VAG409212 LEN Y 1 Wise Yates Nicole Residence STP Salem Rd Wise

VAG409214 LEN Y 1 Wise Stanley Greg Residence STP TBD River School Rd Pound

VAG409218 LEN Y 1 Wise Rose Michael and Kayla Residence STP 7139 Carter Stanley Hwy Coeburn

VAG400006 O & M MR N 1 Washington Braswell Brad and Melanie Duplex 2 23262 Clayman Valley Rd Bristol

VAG400007 O & M MR N 1 Washington Braswell Brad and Melanie Duplex 1 23262 Clayman Valley Rd Bristol

VAG400009 O & M MR N 2 Washington Atkins Anthony Residences STP 31227 Cornett Road Damascus

VAG400012 X MC MR Y 1 Washington McFadden Sherry Residence STP 14227 Peaceful Valley Road Abingdon

VAG400042 MC MR Y 1 Washington Lineberry Michael and Suzanne N Residence STP30095 North Fork River Road Saltville

VAG400045 O & M MR Y 1 Washington Clark Larry Residence STP 18393 McCalls Gap Road Bristol

VAG400053 MC MR Y 2 Washington Doss Sharon and Buford Residence STP 29383 Blue Springs Road Meadowview

VAG400055 MC MR N 2 Washington Country Boy Seed Incorporated STP 6685 Gate City Highway Bristol

VAG400062 O & M MR Y 1 Carroll Bartlett Anthony J Residence STP 2107 Pipers Gap Road Galax

VAG400066 O & M MR N 1 Washington Dillon Matt Residence STP 3088 Willow Branch Rd Bristol

VAG400071 MC MR N 1 Smyth Poston Gracie Residences STP 614 Walkers Creek Road Marion

VAG400086 MC MR Y 1 Washington Goff Byron Residence STP 30134 Aistrop Road Saltville

VAG400088 MC MR N 1 Washington Greendale Chapel Fellowship Hall STP 17468 Rich Valley Rd Abingdon

VAG400102 MC MR N 1 Smyth Hounshell Residences STP 225 Glade Mtn Rd Atkins

VAG400103 O & M MR Y 1 Washington Reynolds David Residence STP 15045 Fall Hill Road Abingdon

remine [| Jansnmadroc|ari acre] com recy racy ne rey [racine ed on be [raceones cen] + [1 | set emet apt Restore sve ra Rotate Vey ow [raceooreo a lise coy [raccoons en] —y [1 | _wae _ [anv si Reser Se ste Gian foe se coun laceoaiee cen] v1 | so flow nctaa Reson TP avctoe scot couny [acteurs en] _¥ [+ | soe _pesng Oona ana rary SEH Resse ua Ra scot coun [ractoree cen] + [+ | wine _ [Powers no Restince STP [uck cam Ra lis ony [racconer cen] _y [1 | wae _ [Enns Ta. Reson str smiooe lis Goiy [raccoons a lise coy [raccoores cen] y+ | wae _ oorson any Resoree STP so Roninon a Re se Gon laceoairo ten] vy _| 1 | soot _[Sovtervotinenesdenest? [tone lowe cny com cen] 6 | 1 | tow [earerchameAResdenoesst® [sr rvert ks couny [ractorra en] [1 | wae _[eaton ck and Crate Sn Restores and 013 Poe ge Rin Gai [raceorra en] + [+ | wae _[eotn dckand Gate Sy Restrces SP

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400124 MC MR N 1 Washington Little Flock Holiness Church STP 8417 Old Mill Road Glade Spring

VAG400126 O & M MR Y 1 Carroll Malcomb Lonnie W Residence STP 3216 Fancy Gap Hwy Hillsville

VAG400145 MC MR N 1 Smyth Olinger James and Debbie Residences STP 109 Stagecoach Ln Saltville

VAG400181 O&M MR Y 1 Washington Smith James D Residence STP 34616 Fleet Road Glade Spring

VAG400194 MC MR N 1 Washington Umberger Residences STP 35273 Bucks Bridge Road Glade Spring

VAG400209 MC MR N 1 Washington Long Jimmy & Kim Residences STP 22404 Willow Creek Circle Bristol

VAG400210 O & M MR N 1 Washington Willow Creek Lots 42 & 43 Residences STP 22332 Willow Creek Circle Bristol

VAG400222 O & M MR N 1 Wythe Saldivar Helena R Residences STP 112 Wise Drive Ivanhoe

VAG400242 MC MR N 1 Washington Smith Bonnie Residences STP 11439 Toole Creek Rd Abingdon

VAG400245 MC MR N 1 Washington Virginia Highlands Christian Fellowship Church STP22417 Watauga Road Abingdon

VAG400287 MC MR N 1 Wythe Dehart & Payne Dwellings STP 323 Stillwell Rd Draper

VAG400290 O & M MR N 1 Carroll Utts Campground STP 574 Campground Road Fancy Gap

VAG400299 O & M MR N 1 Washington Hess Howard Residences 22460 Remington Drive Abingdon

VAG400309 MC MR N 1 Washington Spoon Gap Freewill Baptist Church STP 19181 Spoon Gap Rd Abingdon

VAG400319 NB MR Y 1 Smyth Hubble James M and Adrienne D Residence STP2205 Old Wilderness Road Smyth County

VAG400321 O&M MR N 1 Washington Mayfield Dual Residences STP 20245 Shadowood Circle Meadowview

VAG400324 MC MR N 1 Washington SERVPRO Industries, Inc. STP 27074 Lee Highway Abingdon

VAG400328 MC MR N 1 Bland Caudill - Cook Residences STP 13675 N Scenic Hwy Rocky Gap

VAG400439 O & M MR N 1 Carroll Whitney Lane Apartments 85 Whitney Ln Galax

VAG400481 MC MR N 1 Washington Kell Rebecca Residences STP 9389 Old Mill Rd Glade Spring

VAG400491 MC MR Y 1 Washington Clark Ralph and Donna Residence STP 15491 Monroe Road Glade Spring

VAG400506 MC MR Y 1 Bland Bailey John and Christy Residence STP 8903 Wilderness Rd Bland

VAG400520 MC MR N 1 Washington Valley Chapel and Parsonage STP 18060 Brumley Gap Rd Abingdon

VAG400527 O & M MR N 1 Washington Orfield Betsy L Residences 32214 & 32222 Old Salt Works Rd Meadowview

VAG400544 X MC MR Y 1 Grayson Samuels Taylor H Residence STP 101 Brickside Ln Galax

VAG400548 MC MR Y 1 Smyth Shupe Eric and Lindsey Residence STP 1484 Walkers Creek Marion

VAG400576 O&M MR N 1 Smyth Grove Baptist Church STP 1811 Walkers Creek Road Marion

VAG400579 NB MR Y 1 Smyth Mountain Joe Company Residence STP 1839 Nicks Creek Rd Atkins

VAG400585 MC MR Y 1 Washington Greenwald Michael and Karalee Residence STP15326 Greenway Rd Meadowview

VAG400616 MR Y 1 Washington Gillespie Delmus Rush Residence STP 17057 Mill Creek Rd Meadowview

VAG400618 MR Y 1 Washington McKinney Donna G and Samuel Residence STP31298 Rivermont Dr Meadowview

VAG400652 MC MR N 1 Wythe Lane Enterprises Lot 31 Progress Park STP 510 Kents Ln Wytheville

VAG400654 NB MR Y 1 Washington Heath Russell Dennis Residence STP 31315 Rivermont Dr Meadowview

VAG400687 NB MR Y 2 Washington Handy James and Carolyn Residence STP 19263 North Fork River Rd Abingdon

VAG400706 NB MR Y 2 Carroll Laurel Mountain Lot 43 Residence STP St Rte 735 Carroll Co

VAG400707 NB MR Y 2 Carroll Laurel Mountain Lot 44 Residence STP St Rte 735 Carroll Co

VAG400708 NB MR Y 2 Carroll Laurel Mountain Lot 45 Residence STP St Rte 735 Carroll Co

VAG400734 NB MR Y 1 Washington Mullins Jeremy Residence STP 8176 Wagner Rd Bristol

VAG400747 NB MR Y 1 Grayson Link Street Developers LLC Residence STP US 21 Grayson Co

VAG400756 NB MR Y 1 Bland Delay James and Penny Residence STP St Rte 601 Bland County

VAG400766 NB MR Y 1 Washington Michalski Gerald J and Marlene Residence STP28375 Poor Valley Rd Saltville

VAG400816 MC MR Y 1 Washington Barr Earl W Residence STP 21118 Grassy Ridge Rd Damascus

VAG400817 NB MR Y 1 Smyth Keesee Christopher Douglas STP 796 St Clair Creek Rd Chilhowie

Permit No

R e t u r n s

MaintenancePDC SFH (dot) Type County Facility Name Facility Address FCity

VAG400818 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Roy Allman Development Lot 1 and 9 STP St Rte 69 Carroll Co

VAG400819 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Roy Allman Development Lot 2 STP St Rte 69 Carroll Co

VAG400820 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Roy Allman Development Lot 3 and 7 STP St Rte 69 Carroll Co

VAG400821 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Roy Allman Development Lot 4 STP St Rte 69 Carroll Co

VAG400822 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Roy Allman Development Lot 5 STP St Rte 69 Carroll Co

VAG400823 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Roy Allman Development Lot 8 STP St Rte 69 Carroll Co

VAG400824 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Roy Allman Development Lot 6 STP St Rte 69 Carroll Co

VAG400841 NB MR N 1 Smyth Blue Ridge Discovery Center STP St Rte 603 Smyth Co

VAG400843 NB MR N 1 Wythe Eversole Richard Residences STP 1221 Red Hollow Ln Max Meadows

VAG400869 MR Y 1 Washington Magnuson Alan and Charlotte Residence STP2492 Mendota Rd Mendota

VAG400882 NB MR Y 1 Smyth Crewey Kenneth and Elaine Residence STP 706 St Clair Creek Rd Chilhowie

VAG400883 O&M MR Y 1 Wythe Marsh Russell L Residence STP 1053 Crockett Rd Crockett

VAG400978 NB MR Y 1 Washington Vestal J.D. and Judy Residence STP 26111 Lorimer Branch Ln Abingdon

VAG409006 MC MR N 1 Washington Dollar General Store STP - Meadowview 29248 Lee Hwy Meadowview

VAG409011 NB MR N 1 Washington Shaw Christopher Lynn Residences STP 14260 Porterfield Hwy Abingdon

VAG409017 NB MR Y 1 Carroll Coletrain Gary Residence STP US 52 Carroll County

VAG409026 NB MR Y 1 Washington Deel Vernon Ray and Rachel Residence STP13104 Porterfield Hwy Washington Co

VAG409036 MC MR N 1 Bland Leadership Development Center System 1 STP13066 W. Bluegrass Tr Bland

VAG409037 MC MR N 1 Bland Leadership Development Center System 2 STP13066 W. Bluegrass Tr Bland

VAG409038 MC MR N 1 Bland Leadership Development Center System 3 STP13066 W. Bluegrass Tr Bland

VAG409040 NB MR N 1 Smyth Bethel Baptist Church STP 964 Laurel Valley Rd Troutdale

VAG409053 NB MR Y 1 Smyth Minton Sandra Residence STP St Rte 613 Smyth Co

VAG409063 NB MR N 1 Wythe Locher Silica Corp and Smokin Guns STP E Lee Hwy - US 11 Wythe County

VAG409071 MR Y 1 Washington Burrows John and Catherine Residence STP 15521 Large Hollow Rd Bristol

VAG409105 NB MR N 1 Bland Crouse Dakotah and Sara Residences STP 6598 Grapefield Rd Bland County

VAG409121 MC MR N 1 Washington Dollar General Store STP - Bristol VA 6869 Gate City Hwy Bristol

VAG409128 NB MR N 1 Washington SpiritWheel Allegiance Inc STP US 19 Washington Co

VAG409157 MR N 1 Bland W&B Fabricators STP 111 Enterprise Ln Bland County

VAG409177 MR N 1 Washington Dutton Rental Property 34520 Fleet Rd Washington Co

VAG409182 MR N 1 Washington M and D Partners Garage STP 20084 Rustic Lane Washington Co

VAG409187 MR N 1 Washington Hahn Emergency Vet Clinic STP 29231 Lee Hwy Meadowview

VAG409210 MR N 1 Washington Abingdon MHP, LLC STP 16471 Canyon Dr Abingdon

VAG409216 MR N 1 Smyth W-L Construction Glade Spring Asphalt Plant STP33040 Ramblewood Dr Glade Spring

VAG400562

roma [fund ose] eno rane Pty An 9 faces] [ve [om] v [+ | cow ovenantoctemenia tags a amos lores frowns [nem] y+ | cow oratories ore [aneon errs fcsnnar] [ve [om] y [+ | co foyarontomenire ate [eee eer a = PC = frosoace| [vem] y | + | cow oyAianoeetomeniae ate [anes rte Prosnne[ [ne [oe] [+ | are sney canner ame nme Pacem] [nef] | + | wm [eenoercireseos sre [it Ratan oo facie vm] 7 [+ [ra ec At ht Reo rr ox fxcenma[ [mw [we] v1 | Se [aemytomennctare cen Sf Sart Erno faciina| [om [we] v1 | ote fiertieatcneawessie ——_fstoncarhe eae a a fsense [mem | oe | + [wasnt aie P-tnnwnta y = fssner | [ve [wr] [+ [wasn] te cane ion tees TP [to Poway = finer] [ve [wr] —y [+ | cow leoancarneneesre ise = PC igen co facie [we [owe] w+ | tela ener Ca San Rapa = a ee = frsonse| [me [| oo [+ [esti rer ar aun ge = a ev Fan fcsonse| [ve [or] y [+ | sre fess netner ste area mo fess] [ve [ue] | + | wire now sae Copano Grn Petey Ua hme cane fins] ve [oe] | + [wre owas Capanatn ie P[euein-08 ht cay or vm | 71 [regrets aca Lae = a 7 A = fncsonae] [ve [wr] 0 [+ [nasal renrisene neste sve oo hacerar ee inemanin cary pan ee nr igen ro ve | [+ [tate nO amen Oreo? eer agence face? vm 0+ [wang amenene vacate ey basin om eC eo erin

vaccoose2|

APPENDIX G

EPA FACT SHEETS FOR DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER

APPENDIX G

EPA FACT SHEETS FOR DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems

INTRODUCTION

Approximately one in five households in the United States rely on decentralized wastewater systems, such as single-family

home septic systems or community cluster systems, for wastewater treatment and disposal. For communities relying on decentralized systems,

costs to repair, replace, or install systems can be expensive, and these costs are often the homeowner’s responsibility. EPA’s
Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems: Pathways to Success with the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program Guide helps community leaders, local and state decentralized

wastewater treatment programs and state Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) administrators understand how the CWSRF can be a viable source of financing for decentralized systems.

The Guide details (1) the CWSRF Program; (2) How to Use the CWSRF to Finance Decentralized System Projects; (3) Options for CWSRF Loan Repayment; and (4) Initiating a Financing Program for Decentralized Wastewater Systems with the CWSRF. This summary sheet highlights key content from these sections.

The CWSRF Program

EPA’s CWSRF Program, administered individually by each state and Puerto Rico,

provides low-cost financing for wastewater infrastructure and water quality projects, including decentralized wastewater system projects. The CWSRF functions like an environmental infrastructure bank, providing funding, primarily in the form of below-market interest rate loans to eligible borrowers. However, it is important to note that States are afforded extensive flexibility in administering their program, including defining project and applicant eligibilities, financing terms, and loan forgiveness options f

. or qualified borrowers.

Contact your state for details

CWSRF Financing Fundamentals

Is my project eligible for CWSRF funding?

• Planning and design • Construction • CWSRF CANNOT pay for operations

and maintenance (O&M)

Your state’s CWSRF staff can help you understand what costs may/may not be included in a CWSRF loan.

What kinds of projects are eligible?

• New septic system installation • Repair/replacement projects • Converting cesspools to septics • Cluster systems or community package plants • Certain fees associated with setting up a

special district or a Responsible Management Entity

Am I eligible to apply?

The CWSRF may lend to: • Communities, municipalities, townships,

counties, political subdivisions • Individual homeowners • Citizen groups • Non-profit organizations • Public utility computers

What terms are available? Within statutory limits, state CWSRF programs
have a great deal of flexibility to offer

borrowers, including leeway with: • Interest rate and repayment loans • Limited amounts of loan forgiveness • Sculpted repayment structures to

accommodate borrower cash flows

Check with staff in your state about how a CWSRF loan can be customized to fit your needs.

Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems

INTRODUCTION

proximately one in five household / \ the United States rely on decentralized wastewater systems, such as single-family home septic systems or community cluster systems, for wastewater treatment and disposal For communities relying on decentralized systems, costs to repair, replace, or install systems can be expensive, and these costs are often the homeowner’s responsibility. EPA’s Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment. Systems: Pathways to. Success with the Clean’

STMT ENON TOS

Water State Revolving. Fund Program Guide helps community leaders, local and state decentralized wastewater treatment programs and state Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) administrators understand how the CWSRF can be a viable source of financing for decentralized systems.

The Guide details (1) the CWSRF Program; (2) How to Use the CWSRF to Finance Decentralized System Projects; (3) Options for CWSRF Loan Repayment; and (4) Initiating a Financing Program for Decentralized Wastewater Systems with the CWSRE. This summary sheet highlights key content from these sections.

The CWSRF Program

EPA’s CWSRF Program, administered individually by each state and Puerto Rico,

provides low-cost financing for wastewater

infrastructure and water quality projects, including

decentralized wastewater system projects.

The CWSRF functions like an environmental

infrastructure bank, providing funding, primarily

in the form of below-market interest rate loans

to eligible borrowers. However, it is important to

note that States are afforded extensive flexibility

in administering their program, including defining

project and applicant eligibilities, financing terms,

and loan forgiveness options for qualified borrowers.

Contact your state for details.

CWSRF Financing Fundamentals

Is my project eligible for CWSRF funding?

Planning and design © Construction
CWSRF CANNOT pay for operations and maintenance (O&M)

Your state’s CWSRF staff can help you understand what costs may/may not be included in a CWSRF loan.

What kinds of projects are el

New septic system installation

Converting cesspools to septics

Certain fees associated with setting up a

special district or a Responsible Management Entity

le?

Am I eligible to apply? The CWSRF may lend to:

Individual homeowners
Citizen groups
Non-profit organizations
Public utility computers

Within statutory limits, state CWSRF programs

have a great deal of flexibility to offer

borrowers, including leeway with:

Interest rate and repayment loans
Limited amounts of loan forgiveness

@ What terms are available?

Check with staff in your state about how a CWSRF loan’ can be customized to fit your needs.

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems

How Can I Use the CWSRF to Finance My Decentralized System Project?

Federal statutes give states the ability to finance decentralized systems, but states determine whether
and how to provide the financing. If a CWSRF program determines there is a need and demand for

decentralized system financing, it will assess the best way(s) to offer financing. The table below highlights the most common mechanisms used by states for financing decentralized systems. As of 2020, only 11 states regularly use the CWSRF to finance decentralized wastewater projects. The Guide provides detailed information on each of these mechanisms, including case studies.

How Do CWSRF Decentralized System Financing Programs Work?

Options for Loan Repayment

Federal statutes require that borrowers have a viable source of loan repayment. The three most common
forms of repayment for decentralized system projects include:

• Property Tax Assessment Financing (PTAF): A commonly used tool to help avoid high upfront costs with decentralized system projects. This approach allows the homeowner to pay for the project through a long-term, fixed-cost financing option underwritten by the value of the property.

• Septic Utility Fees: A cluster system or group of households may collect fees to pay for O&M. This fee can be used as a potential repayment source for the installation, repair, or replacement costs of decentralized systems.

na United States 7 Environmental Protection LY 4 Agency

Financing Decentralized

Wastewater Treatment Systems

How Can | Use the CWSRF to

inance My Decentralized System Pri

ject?

Federal statutes give states the ability to finance decentralized systems, but states determine whether and how to provide the financing. If a CWSRF program determines there is a need and demand for decentralized system financing, it will assess the best way(s) to offer financing. The table below highlights the most common mechanisms used by states for financing decentralized systems. As of 2020, only 11 states regularly use the CWSRF to finance decentralized wastewater projects. The Guide provides detailed information

on each of these mecha!

sms, including case studies.

How Do CWSRF Decentralized System Financing Programs Work?

nding Structure Direct homeowner loan

Linked deposit loan

Pass-through loan

CDFI pass-through

‘Sub-state revolving fund

Sponsorship

Co-funding

How does it work

The state CWSRF signs a loan directly with the property owner.

‘The borrower applies for funding at a participating bank. The CWSRF buys down the interest rate that the bank charges the borrower.

‘The CWSRF makes a loan to a state or local government unit (agency, county, or special district), which uses the funds to make loans for decentralized projects, The government unit ensures repayment of the CWSRF loan.

Same as above, but through a CDFI or other financial institution.

‘The CWSRF makes a loan to the partner to capitalize another revolving fund, Returns on the sub-state

revolving fund are used to repay the CWSRF and to make new loans.

\creases the size of its loan to. sponsor a NPS project. In exchange, the CWSRE reduces the interest rate on the loan to cancel out the cost of the NPS project.

‘The CWSRF co-finances projects with another funding entity.

v DE

1 is doing it?

lA, MD, OH

CT, MA, MN, NJ, OH, PA, WV

ID, OR, WA, WV

MO, OH, RI, VA, WA

DE, IA, OH, OR all have sponsorship programs but they have not been used for decentralized projects

Every state does this, but may not have used this approach for financing. decentralized projects.

Options for Loan Repayment

Federal statutes require that borrowers have a viable source of loan repayment. The three most common

forms of repayment for decentralized system projects include:

Property Tax Assessment Financing (PTAF): A ‘commonly used tool to help avoid high upfront costs with decentralized system projects. This approach allows the homeowner to pay for the project through a long-term, fixed-cost financing option underwritten by the value of the property.

Septic Utility Fees: A cluster system or group of households may collect fees to pay for O&M. This fee can be used as a potential repayment source

for the installation, repair, or replacement costs of decentralized systems.

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems

• Homeowners Association Dues: The CWSRF can make loans directly to homeowner’s associations (HOAs), which are then repaid with revenues from HOA dues. Maryland has used this approach for

several types of nonpoint source projects and could also include decentralized system projects.

In addition to these options, the Financing Options for Non-Traditional Eligibilities in the CWSRF report features a variety of additional potential repayment sources.

Initiating a Financing Program for Decentralized Wastewater Systems with the CWSRF

Stakeholders may approach a CWSRF with a decentralized system financing proposal if the CWSRF does not already offer decentralized financing or if a different mechanism than what is offered would be a better fit. The Guide provides a roadmap for how a decentralized system program can be successfully financed by the CWSRF.

Identify the Problem and Technical Solution. Issues are determined by public health, environmental, and economic impacts. Technical solutions include community engagement as well as consulting engineers/designers early in the process.
Review CWSRF Financing Options. These include eligibility, repayment, and types of financing mechanisms.
Identify Potential Partners. Partnering organizations must be eligible CWSRF participants.
Meet with CWSRF Staff. CWSRF program staff can discuss proposed projects and identify the best financing mechanism.
Develop an O&M Plan. These activities are not eligible expenses for CWSRF financing, yet property owners should be equipped with appropriate education and training tools.
Communicate Potential Costs and Benefits. Meet with community members to discuss the potential costs, benefits, timelines, and plans.
Put Together a CWSRF Financing Proposal. Identify the financing mechanism and tailor the CWSRF application to suit it.
Sign Financing Agreements. This arrangement is dependent on the type of financing mechanism selected.
Implement Decentralized System Projects. These can include construction, repair, and replacement of a septic system.

Finally, for a decentralized system financing program to thrive, communication to stakeholders about financing options available is critical. The Guide provides several outreach examples for reaching potential borrowers.

MORE INFORMATION

CWSRF State Program Contacts: www.epa.gov/ cwsrf/state-cwsrf-program-contacts

Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems: Pathways to Success with the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program: www.epa. gov/system/files/documents/2022-02/financing- dwts.pdf

Financing Options for Nontraditional Eligibilities in the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Programs: epa.gov/cwsrf/financing-options- nontraditional-eligibilities-cwsrf

Document Number: EPA-832-F-22-013 | August 2022

https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/state-cwsrf-program-contacts http://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/state-cwsrf-program-contacts https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-02/financing-dwts.pdf http://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-02/financing-dwts.pdf http://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-02/financing-dwts.pdf https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-05/documents/financing_options_for_nontraditional_eligibilities_final.pdf https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/financing-options-nontraditional-eligibilities-cwsrf https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-05/documents/financing_options_for_nontraditional_eligibilities_final.pdf https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-05/documents/financing_options_for_nontraditional_eligibilities_final.pdf https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-05/documents/financing_options_for_nontraditional_eligibilities_final.pdf a United States or, Environmental Protection LY 4 Agency

Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems

Homeowners Association Dues: The CWSRF can make loans directly to homeowner’s associations (HOAs), which are then repaid with revenues from HOA dues. Maryland has used this approach for several types of nonpoint source projects and could also include decentralized system projects.

In addition to these options,

in the CWSRF report features a variety of additional potential repayment sources.

Initiating a Financing Program for

Decentralized Wastewater Systems with the CWSRF

. Identify the Problem and Technical Solution. Issues are determined by public health, environmental, and economic impacts. Technical solutions include community engagement as well as consulting engineers/designers early in the process.

Review CWSRF Financing Options. These include eligibility, repayment, and types of mechanisms.
Identify Potential Partners. Partnering organizations must be eligible CWSRF participants.
Meet with CWSRF Staff. CWSRF program staff can discuss proposed projects and identify the best financing mechanism.
Develop an O&M Plan. These activities are not eligible expenses for CWSRF financing, yet property owners should be equipped with appropriate education and training tools.
Communicate Potential Costs and Benefits. Meet with community members to discuss the potential costs, benefits, timelines, and plans,
Put Together a CWSRF Financing Proposal. Identify the financing mechanism and tailor the CWSRF application to suit
Sign Financing Agreements. This arrangement is dependent on the type of financing mechanism selected.
Implement Decentralized System Projects. These can include construction, repair, and replacement of a septic system.

MORE INFORMATION

CWSRF State Program Contacts: www.epa.gov/

Financing Decentralized Wastewater Treatment ‘Systems: Pathways to Success with the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program: www.epa, gov/system/files/documents/2022-02/financing- dwts.pdf

Financing Options for Nontraditional Eligibilities

in the Clean Water State Revolving Fund

Programs: epa.govicwsrffinancing-options- Oe

Document Number: EPA-832-F-22-013 | August 2022

DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAN PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC

HEALTH, AND WATER QUALITY

Decentralized wastewater treatment systems can protect the environment, public health, and water quality in homes and communities by: • providing reliable wastewater treatment, • reducing conventional pollutants, nutrients, and

emerging contaminants, and • mitigating contamination and health risks

associated with wastewater.

HOW CAN DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND WATER QUALITY?

Providing reliable wastewater treatment

– Decentralized wastewater treatment

systems can offer as much public health

and environmental protection as centralized

treatment systems. Like centralized

treatment, decentralized treatment systems

must be properly designed and constructed

and well maintained. More than ever, these

systems typically include good monitoring

and backup that help prevent adverse

discharges. The modern decentralized

treatment system is as reliable as other

wastewater treatment alternatives, and it is

also a cost-effective and sustainable method

of treatment for communities.

Reducing conventional pollutants,

nutrients, and emerging contaminants

– Decentralized treatment can produce

effluent quality that is equal to or higher

than other wastewater disposal options.

These decentralized systems use the

same advanced treatment technologies as

discharging systems. Since they use the

treatment capacity of the soil, they achieve

high quality treatment at a lower cost than

other options. Cluster systems, also called

community systems, allow for centralized

management of the wastewater via contract

by a third party – a Responsible Management

Entity (RME). Communities can enter into

agreements with nearby public utilities or

local cooperatives to create public private

partnerships to provide management for

decentralized wastewater treatment.

Mitigating contamination and health risks

associated with wastewater – Sewage

pathogens cause many human illnesses,

including aseptic meningitis, cholera,

dysentery, encephalitis, gastroenteritis,

infectious hepatitis, and typhoid fever.

Using decentralized systems allows for

multiple layers of treatment including,

advanced treatment and disinfection

which can help mitigate the risk of human

exposure and disease transmission.

Small systems in single family homes can

include secondary treatment from a variety

of treatment technologies (e.g., aerobic

treatment, recirculating filters, etc.). Larger

neighborhood systems may be designed

using high-level treatment and pressure

dispersal of highly treated wastewater

to utilize marginal soils. Therefore,

decentralized systems can be designed to

overcome the potential health risks posed

by septic systems in areas often considered

unsuitable for development because of

limited permeability, limited vertical depths

and high water tables. The EPA Decentralized Wastewater Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Partnership,

created in 2005, has served as an ongoing cooperative relationship between the EPA

and Signatory Organizations to effectively and collaboratively address management and

performance issues pertaining to decentralized systems.

Glean Water 3 ars ct

DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAN PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC

HEALTH, AND WATER QUALITY

Decentralized wastewater treatment systems can protect the environment, public health, and water quality in homes and communities by:

providing reliable wastewater treatment,

reducing conventional pollutants, nutrients, and

emerging contaminants, and

mitigating contamination and health risks associated with wastewater.

HOW CAN DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND WATER QUALITY?

Providing reliable wastewater treatment. ~ Decentralized wastewater treatment ‘systems can offer as much public health and environmental protection as centralized treatment systems. Like centralized treatment, decentralized treatment systems must be properly designed and constructed ‘and well maintained. More than ever, these ‘systems typically include good monitoring land backup that help prevent adverse discharges. The modem decentralized treatment system is as reliable as other wastewater treatment altematives, and itis also a cost-effective and sustainable method of treatment for communities.

The EPA Decent created in 20 {and Signatory Organizations to effe

‘and collaboratively addr ssues pertaining to decentralized system:

Reducing conventional pollutants, nutrients, and emerging contaminants

— Decentralized treatment can produce effluent quality that is equal to or higher

than other wastewater disposal options. ‘These decentralized systems use the

same advanced treatment technologies as discharging systems. Since they use the treatment capacity of the soil, they achieve high quality treatment at a lower cost than, other options. Cluster systems, also called ‘community systems, allow for centralized management of the wastewater via contract by a third party ~ a Responsible Management Entity (RME). Communities can enter into ‘agreements with nearby public utilities or local cooperatives to create public private Partnerships to provide management for decentralized wastewater treatment.

ship between the EPA

‘management

Mitigating contamination and health risks associated with wastewater — Sewage pathogens cause many human illnesses, including aseptic meningitis, cholera, dysentery, encephalitis, gastroenteritis, infectious hepatitis, and typhoid fever. Using decentralized systems allows for multiple layers of treatment including, ‘advanced treatment and disinfection

which can help mitigate the risk of human ‘exposure and disease transmission.

‘Small systems in single family homes can, include secondary treatment from a variety of treatment technologies (e.g., aerobic treatment, recirculating fiters, etc.). Larger neighborhood systems may be designed using high-level treatment and pressure dispersal of highly treated wastewater

to utilize marginal soils. Therefore, decentralized systems can be designed to overcome the potential health risks posed by septic systems in areas often considered unsuitable for development because of limited permeabilty, imited vertical depths and high water tables.

WHERE IT’S WORKED

Caroline County, VA

In the late 1990s, the Virginia Department of Health noted public

health issues arising in the Dawn area of Caroline County, Virginia.

Residents were suffering from failing or unreliable drain fields due

to poor soils in the area. The County sought a declaration of “public

health emergency” from the Virginia Department of Health. Early

plans to connect with a centralized wastewater treatment plan proved

cost-prohibitive, so the County turned to a decentralized solution. To

finance the Dawn Project, non-local funding sources were pursued,

including Community Development Block Grant funds, an EPA State

and Territorial Assistance Grant, as well as other grants and loans.

Three years later in the summer of 2007, the first homes were fully

connected to the working decentralized system (including advanced

control units, septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) tanks, and fixed

activated flood treatment (FAST) units; see photo). Within the next

18 month, 182 homes and businesses were connected to the Dawn

Decentralized Wastewater Treatment System, thereby eliminating

reliance upon conventional septic systems and the health risks of

failing systems. More than half the connected homes are owned

by low-to-moderate income deed holders. The community was fully

engaged throughout the project, through surveying and construction.

By the completion of the project, the community felt its needs were

addressed. For more information: http://www.foresterpress.com/

ow_0701_taming.html

Bio-Microbics FAST unit, courtesy KOWA

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin: Managing Septic Systems to Prevent Contamination of

Drinking Water – http://www.epa.gov/safewater/sourcewater/pubs/fs-supp-septic.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Healthy Septic Systems – http://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/hia.htm

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual. – http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic/pubs/septic_2002_

osdm_all.pdf

Crites, Ronald and George Tchobanoglous. 1998. Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems. McGraw-Hill.

For more information on the individual MOU Partners, click on the logos below or go to http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic.

Contact Information: [email protected] or 202-564-1162

http://www.epa.gov/safewater/sourcewater/pubs/fs-supp-septic.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/hia.htm http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic/pubs/septic_2002_osdm_all.pdf http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic/pubs/septic_2002_osdm_all.pdf http://www.foresterpress.com/ow_0701_taming.html http://www.foresterpress.com/ow_0701_taming.html mailto:[email protected] http://www.asdwa.org/ http://www.foresterpress.com/ow_0701_taming.html http://www.natat.org/ http://www.neha.org/index.shtml http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/ http://www.nowra.org/ http://www.rcap.org/ http://www.werf.org http://www.wef.org/default.aspx http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/sora/SORA_ORG.cfm http://www.astho.org/ www.epa.gov/owm/onsite http://www.acwa-us.org/ http://www.nsf.org/ http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ http://www.gwpc.org/ http://www.nawt.org/ WHERE IT’S WORKED

Caroline County, VA

Bio-Microbies FAST unit, courtesy KOWA

In the late 1900s, the Virginia Department of Health noted public health issues arising in the Dawn area of Caroline County, Virginia. Residents were suffering from failing or unreliable drain fields due {0 poor soils in the area. The County sought a declaration of ‘public health emergency’ from the Virginia Department of Health. Early

plans to connect with a centralized wastewater treatment plan proved

cost-prohibitive, so the County turned to a decentralized solution. To finance the Dawn Project, non-local funding sources were pursued, including Community Development Block Grant funds, an EPA State and Territorial Assistance Grant, as well as other grants and loans, ‘Three years later in the summer of 2007, the first homes were fully ‘connected to the working decentralized system (including advanced ‘control units, septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) tanks, and fixed activated flood treatment (FAST) units; see photo). Within the next 18 month, 182 homes and businesses were connected to the Dawn Decentralized Wastewater Treatment System, thereby eliminating reliance upon conventional septic systems and the health risks of falling systems. More than half the connected homes are owned

by low-to-moderate income deed holders. The community was fully ‘engaged throughout the project, through surveying and construction, By the completion of the project, the community felt its needs were ‘addressed. For more information: hitp:wwwforesterpress.com/ ‘ow_0701_taming,html

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES,

USS. Environmental Protection Agency’s Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin: Managing Septic Systems to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water — http:/www.epa.govisafewater/sourcewater/pubs\ts-supp-septic.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Healthy Septic Systems — http:/www.cde.govihealthyplaces/hia htm

USS. Environmental Protection Agency’s Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual. ~http:/www.epa.govlowmiseptic/pubs/septic_2002_ ‘osdm_all pdf

rites, Ronald and George Tchobanoglous. 1998. Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems. McGraw-Hill

For more information on the individual MOU Partners, click on the logos below or go to http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic.

ARGIDWT pane

Anam WEEE

Contact Information: [email protected] or 202-564-1162

DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT:

A SENSIBLE SOLUTION

Many communities are considering decentralized wastewater treatment and the economic and environmental advantages these types of systems can offer. Today, decentralized treatment can provide the safety and reliability of conventional large-scale treatment, and can also offer many additional benefits to communities.

WHAT IS DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT? Decentralized wastewater treatment

consists of a variety of approaches for

collection, treatment, and dispersal/reuse

of wastewater for individual dwellings,

industrial or institutional facilities, clusters

of homes or businesses, and entire

communities. An evaluation of site-specific

conditions is performed to determine the

appropriate type of treatment system

for each location. These systems are a

part of permanent infrastructure and can

be managed as stand-alone facilities or

be integrated with centralized sewage

treatment systems. They provide a range

of treatment options from simple, passive

treatment with soil dispersal, commonly

referred to as septic or onsite systems, to

more complex and mechanized approaches

such as advanced treatment units that

collect and treat waste from multiple

buildings and discharge to either surface

waters or the soil. They are typically installed

at or near the point where the wastewater

is generated. Systems that discharge to

the surface (water or soil surfaces) require

a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System (NPDES) permit.

These systems can:

• Serve on a variety of scales including

individual dwellings, businesses, or

small communities;

• Treat wastewater to levels protective of

public health and water quality;

• Comply with municipal and state

regulatory codes; and

• Work well in rural, suburban and urban

settings.

WHY DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT? Decentralized wastewater treatment can

be a smart alternative for communities

considering new systems or modifying,

replacing, or expanding existing wastewater

treatment systems. For many communities,

decentralized treatment can be:

• Cost-effective and economical • Avoiding large capital costs

• Reducing operation and maintenance

costs

• Promoting business and job

opportunities

• Green and sustainable • Benefiting water quality and availability

• Using energy and land wisely

• Responding to growth while preserving

green space

• Safe in protecting the environment,

public health, and water quality • Protecting the community’s health

• Reducing conventional pollutants,

nutrients, and emerging contaminants

• Mitigating contamination and health

risks associated with wastewater

THE BOTTOM LINE Decentralized wastewater treatment can

be a sensible solution for communities of

any size and demographic. Like any other

system, decentralized systems must be

properly designed, maintained, and operated

to provide optimum benefits. Where they are

determined to be a good fit, decentralized

systems help communities reach the triple

bottom line of sustainability: good for the

environment, good for the economy, and

good for the people.

The EPA Decentralized Wastewater

Memorandum of Understanding

(MOU) Partnership, created in

2005, has served as an ongoing

cooperative relationship between the

EPA and Signatory Organizations to

effectively and collaboratively address

management and performance issues

pertaining to decentralized systems.

WHAT IS DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT?

Decentralized wastewater treatment consists of a variety of approaches for collection, treatment, and dispersalireuse of wastewater for individual dwellings, industrial or institutional facilities, clusters ‘of homes or businesses, and entire ‘communities. An evaluation of site-specific conditions is performed to determine the appropriate type of treatment system

for each location, These systems are a

part of permanent infrastructure and can

be managed as stand-alone facilities or

be integrated with centralized sewage treatment systems. They provide a range

of treatment options from simple, passive treatment with soil dispersal, commonty referred to as septic or onsite systems, to more complex and mechanized approaches such as advanced treatment units that collect and treat waste from multiple buildings and discharge to either surface waters or the soil. They are typically installed ator near the point where the wastewater

is generated. Systems that discharge to

the surface (water or soil surfaces) require ‘a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.

WAS

These systems can

Serve on a variety of scales including individual dwellings, businesses, or ‘small communities;
Treat wastewater to levels protective of public health and water quality;
Comply with municipal and state regulatory codes; and
Work well in rural, suburban and urban settings.

WHY DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT? Decentralized wastewater treatment can. be a smart alternative for communities considering new systems or modifying, replacing, or expanding existing wastewater treatment systems. For many communities, decentralized treatment can be:

Cost-effective and economical
Avoiding large capital costs
Reducing operation and maintenance costs
Promoting business and job ‘opportunities
Green and sustainable
Benefiting water quality and availabilty
Using energy and land wisely
Responding to growth while preserving green space

EWATER TREATMENT: A SENSIBLE SOLUTION

DECENTRALIZED

‘Many communities are considering decentralized wastewater treatment and the economic and environmental advantages these types of systems can offer. Today, decentralized treatment can provide the safety and reliability of conventional large-scale treatment, and can also offer many additional benefits to communities.

Safe in protecting the environment, public health, and water quality

Protecting the community’s health

Reducing conventional pollutants, futrients, and emerging contaminants
Mitigating contamination and health risks associated with wastewater

THE BOTTOM LINE Decentralized wastewater treatment can

be a sensible solution for communities of any size and demographic. Like any other system, decentralized systems must be properly designed, maintained, and operated to provide optimum benefits. Where they are determined to be a good fit, decentralized systems help communities reach the triple bottom line of sustainability: good for the environment, good for the economy, and good for the people.

The EPA Decentralized Wastewater ‘Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Partnership, created in 2005, has served as an ongoing ‘cooperative relationship between the EPA and Signatory Organizations to effectively and collaboratively address ‘management and performance issues pertaining to decentralized systems.

WHERE IT’S WORKED

Loudoun County, VA

Loudoun Water, in Loudoun County, Virginia (a Washington, D.C.,

suburb), has adopted an integrated approach to wastewater

management that includes purchased capacity from a centralized

plant, a satellite water reclamation facility, and several small,

community cluster systems. The approach has allowed the county

to maintain its rural character and created a system in which growth

pays for growth. Developers design and construct cluster wastewater

facilities to Loudoun Water standards at their own cost and

transfer ownership of the system to Loudoun Water for continued

maintenance. The program is financially self-sustaining via rates that

cover expenses. For more information: http://www.loudounwater.org/

Rutherford County, TN

Consolidated Utility District (CUD) of Rutherford County, Tennessee,

provides sewer services to many of its outlying customers through

an innovative system. The system being used is often referred to

as a septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) system which consists

of approximately 50 subdivision wastewater systems, all of which

contain a STEP system, a recirculating sand filter, and a large

effluent drip dispersal system. All of the systems are owned and

managed by the Rutherford County CUD. The system allows for

high density development (subdivisions) in areas of the county

where city sewer is not available or soil types are not conducive

to conventional septic tank and drain field lines. The 1,500-gallon

septic tank is equipped with a pump and control panel located

at each residence for controlled discharge of wastewater to a

centralized wastewater collection system. For more information:

http://www.cudrc.com/Departments/Waste-Water.aspx

Drip irrigation fieldPackage plant

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wastewater Management Decentralized Program – www.epa.gov/owm/onsite

Water Environment Research Foundation Decentralized Systems – http://www.werf.org/i/a/k/DecentralizedSystems.aspx

For more information on the individual MOU Partners, click on the logos below or go to http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic.

Contact Information: [email protected] or 202-564-1162

http://www.epa.gov/owm/onsite http://www.werf.org/i/a/k/DecentralizedSystems.aspx http://www.loudounwater.org/ http://www.cudrc.com/Departments/Waste-Water.aspx mailto:[email protected] http://www.asdwa.org/ http://www.onsiteconsortium.org/ http://www.natat.org/ http://www.neha.org/index.shtml http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/ http://www.nowra.org/ http://www.rcap.org/ http://www.werf.org http://www.wef.org/default.aspx http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/sora/SORA_ORG.cfm http://www.astho.org/ www.epa.gov/owm/onsite http://www.acwa-us.org/ http://www.nsf.org/ http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ http://www.gwpc.org/ http://www.nawt.org/ WHERE IT’S WORKED

Loudoun County, VA

Loudoun Water, in Loudoun County, Virginia (a Washington, D.C. suburb), has adopted an integrated approach to wastewater management that includes purchased capacity from a centralized plant, a satelite water rectamation facility, and several small community cluster systems, The approach has allowed the county

‘to maintain its rural character and created a system in which growth pays for growth. Developers design and construct cluster wastewater facilities to Loudoun Water standards at their own cost and

transfer ownership of the system to Loudoun Water for continued maintenance, The program is financially self-sustaining via rates that cover expenses. For more information: http:/www.loudounwater.org/

Package plant

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

USS. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wastewater Management

Rutherford County, TN

Consolidated Uility District (CUD) of Rutherford County, Tennessee, provides sewer services to many of its outlying customers through an innovative system. The system being used is often referred to as a septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) system which consists, of approximately 50 subdivision wastewater systems, all of which contain a STEP system, a recirculating sand fer, and a large effluent drip dispersal system. All ofthe systems are owned and managed by the Rutherford County CUD. The system allows for high density development (subdivisions) in areas of the county where city sewer is not available or soil types are not conducive to conventional septic tank and drain field lines. The 1,500-gallon septic tank is equipped with a pump and control panel located

at each residence for controlled discharge of wastewater to a centralized wastewater collection system. For more information: http:/wmw.cudre.com/Departments/Waste-Water.aspx

Dip irigation field

t Decentralized Program ~ waw.epa.gov/owmionsite

Water Environment Research Foundation Decentralized Systems ~ hitp:/waw.werf orgii/alk/DecentralizedSystems.aspx

For more information on the individual MOU Partners, click on the logos below or go to http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic.

Contact Information: tooke. [email protected] or 202-564-1162

APPENDIX H

DEQ VIRGINIA CWFAP SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA PILOT PROGRAM

APPENDIX H

DEQ VIRGINIA CWFAP SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA PILOT PROGRAM

Overview DEQ’s Clean Water Financing and Assistance Program (CWFAP) is offering loan forgiveness to localities in Southwest Virginia to address critical wastewater infrastructure challenges through a new pilot program. Localities within DEQ’s Southwest Regional Office boundary are encouraged to apply. These are the counties of Bland, Buchanan, Carroll, Dickenson, Grayson, Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, Wise, Wythe and the cities of Bristol, Galax and Norton.

This pilot program will use financial incentives to fund these types of critical projects: sewer system evaluation surveys, inflow and infiltration (I/I) studies, collection system repair projects to reduce I/I and/or sanitary sewer overflows (SSO), and projects that eliminate straight pipe, gray water, and discharges of partially treated wastewater to surface waters in the region. In addition to improving and protecting water quality, the program will foster asset management and promote fiscal sustainability.

This pilot program is especially important to Southwest Virginia, in which many localities have difficulty funding certain types of projects that do not increase revenue streams. In addition to demographic challenges, the region is home to several ecologically important watersheds like the Clinch, Powell and Holston River Watersheds. These river systems support the highest number of rare and imperiled fish and freshwater mussel species in North America, and provide a critical water supply for several communities in Southwest Virginia.

Phase 1 Goal: Reduce inflow and infiltration and eliminate sanitary sewer overflows Sewer system evaluation surveys and collection system repairs are necessary to reduce I/I that cause sanitary sewer overflows. In addition to SSOs, I/I can adversely affect hydraulic capacity in wastewater treatment plants and cause permit violations. Collection system rehabilitation projects contribute to lower operational costs and reduced environmental and public health impacts in the communities where these projects are undertaken. Through Phase 1 of the pilot program DEQ will:

• Fund sanitary sewer evaluation study (SSES) and collection system repairs to reduce I/I, eliminate SSOs and reduce hydraulic overload in wastewater treatment plants.

• Encourage applications using incentives of principal forgiveness and favorable loan terms.

Steps to Participate

Virginia Clean Water Financing and Assistance Program Southwest Virginia Pilot Program

Step Phase 1 1

Political subdivision (county/city/service authority) submits application to fund SSES if initial screening criteria

show one or more of the following:

a. Under current enforcement action for violation of 95% flow policy as stated in the VPDES permit for the facility

b. Flows exceeding 125 gpcd during periods of high groundwater

c. Flows exceeding 275 gpcd during precipitation events

d. Multiple reported rainfall-induced SSOs in six months prior to application submittal

DEQ-CWFAP reviews application and determines if minimum criteria are met

Virginia Clean Water Financing saLDEQ and Assistance Program

BENS Southwest Virginia Pilot Program

ENVINONENTAL QUALITY

Overview

DEQ’s Clean Water Financing and Assistance Program (CWFAP) is offering loan forgiveness to localities in Southwest Virginia to address critical wastewater infrastructure challenges through a new pilot program. Localities within DEQ’s Southwest Regional Office boundary are encouraged to apply. These are the counties of Bland, Buchanan, Carroll, Dickenson, Grayson, Lee, Russell, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, Wise, Wythe and the cities of Bristol, Galax and Norton.

This pilot program will use financial incentives to fund these types of critical projects: sewer system evaluation surveys, inflow and infiltration (I/!) studies, collection system repair projects to reduce I/| and/or sanitary sewer overflows (SSO), and projects that eliminate straight pipe, gray water, and discharges of partially treated wastewater to surface waters in the region. In addition to improving and protecting water quality, the program will foster asset management and promote fiscal sustainability.

Phase 1 Goal: Reduce

flow and infiltration and eli ate sanitary sewer overflows

Sewer system evaluation surveys and collection system repairs are necessary to reduce |/I that cause sanitary sewer overflows. In addition to SSOs, |/1 can adversely affect hydraulic capacity in wastewater treatment plants and cause permit violations. Collection system rehabilitation projects contribute to lower operational costs and reduced

environmental and public health impacts in the communities where these projects are undertaken. Through Phase 1 of the pilot program DEQ will

Fund sanitary sewer evaluation study (SSES) and collection system repairs to reduce I/I, eliminate SSOs and reduce hydraulic overload in wastewater treatment plants.
Encourage applications using incentives of principal forgiveness and favorable loan terms.

Stepsto Participate Phase1 Step 1

Political subdivision (county/city/service authority) submits application to fund SSES if initial screening criteria show one or more of the following:

a. Under current enforcement action for violation of 95% flow policy as stated in the VPDES permit for the facility

b. Flows exceeding 125 gpcd during periods of high groundwater c. Flows exceeding 275 gpcd during precipitation events

d. — Multiple reported rainfall-i

duced $SOs in six months prior to application submittal

DEQ-CWFAP reviews application and determines if minimum criteria are met

Expected Outcomes • Recipients are expected to report all sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). This demonstrates the existence of SSOs.

Communities with reported rainfall-induced SSOs will get priority funding over those who do not report.

• Applicants conduct SSES that culminates in a report to include:

Report and Analysis a. I/I amounts

b. Hydraulic analysis (if warranted)

c. Cost-effective analysis

d. Rehabilitation plan by priority phases (an outline is sufficient)

e. Up-to-date maps (GIS if available) that show collection system and deficiency locations

f. Basic Asset Management Plan (AMP) – AMP requirements listed below

g. Priority list of repairs (SSES priority list can be used as basis for next CWSRF loan application). This can be in the form of a Capital Improvements Plan and utilize information from AMP.

Asset Management Plan a. Inventory of collection system

b. Age of inventoried units

c. Useful life, and remaining useful life

d. Current value (depreciated value of the asset)

e. Present cost (value of the asset today if it is replaced)

f. Replacement cost (expected cost when the life of the asset expires)

g. Projected revenues, expenses, and change in net position

For more information about the program, please contact DEQ Regional Project Manager Allen Cornett at [email protected] or (276) 676-4813.

DEQ-CWFAP closes loan or funding agreement (assuming financial capability is met) and provides up to 75% principle forgiveness for SSES (study and report). Recipient provides 25% match (using cash, other agency grant, or VCWRLF loan) and has 18 months from loan closing to complete SSES.
Applicant submits SSES report (with Asset Management Plan, cost-effective analysis, and list of priority repairs) to DEQ for review.
DEQ and the applicant meet to discuss the SSES report, outcomes and recommendations and determine list of highest priority repairs.
Political subdivision (county/city/political subdivision) submits application for highest priority repairs as determined by DEQ (1st solicitation or cycle after SSES review meeting).
DEQ-CWFAP closes loan (assuming financial capability is met) and provides up to 50% principal forgiveness to address highest priority repairs as determined by DEQ and based upon availability of principal forgiveness funds.
Applicant completes repair work within 15 months of loan closing.
Applicant has or develops sewer use ordinance that prohibits connections to the sanitary sewer system from stormwater sources such as downspouts, basement drains, yard drains, conveyance systems (drop inlets, catch basins, etc.) and DEQ approves before final disbursement.

Phase 1 StepSteps to Participate 2

mailto:William.Spencer%40DEQ.Virginia.gov?subject= 3. DEQ-CWFAP closes loan or funding agreement (assuming financial capability is met) and provides up to 75% principle forgiveness for SSES (study and report). Recipient provides 25% match (using cash, other agency grant, or VCWRLF loan) and has 18 months from loan closing to complete SSES.

Applicant submits SSES report (with Asset Management Plan, cost-effective analysis, and list of priority repairs) to DEQ for review.
DEQand the applicant meet to discuss the SSES report, outcomes and recommendations and determine list of highest priority repairs. Steps to Participate Phase 1 Step 2
Political subdivision (county/city/political subdivision) submits application for highest priority repairs as determined by DEQ (1st solicitation or cycle after SSES review meeting).
DEQ-CWFAP closes loan (assuming financial capability is met) and provides up to 50% principal forgiveness to address highest priority repairs as determined by DEQ and based upon availability of principal forgiveness funds.
Applicant completes repair work within 15 months of loan closing.
Applicant has or develops sewer use ordinance that prohibits connections to the sanitary sewer system from stormwater sources such as downspouts, basement drains, yard drains, conveyance systems (drop inlets, catch basins, etc.) and DEQ approves before final disbursement.

Expected Outcomes

Recipients are expected to report all sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). This demonstrates the existence of $SOs. Communities with reported rainfall-induced SSOs will get priority funding over those who do not report.
Applicants conduct SSES that culminates in a report to include: Report and Analysis a. I/lamounts b. Hydraulic analysis (if warranted) c. Costeffective analysis d. Rehabilitation plan by priority phases (an outline is sufficient) €. Up-to-date maps (GIS if available) that show collection system and deficiency locations f. Basic Asset Management Plan (AMP) - AMP requirements listed below

g- Priority list of repairs (SSES priority list can be used as basis for next CWSRF loan application). This can be in the form of a Capital Improvements Plan and utilize information from AMP.

Asset Management Plan

a Inventory of collection system

b. ‘Age of inventoried units

Current value (depreciated value of the asset)

e Present cost (value of the asset today if it is replaced)

f. Replacement cost (expected cost when the life of the asset expires) g Projected revenues, expenses, and change in net position

For more information about the program, please contact DEQ Regional Project Manager Allen Cornett at

[email protected] or (276) 676-4813.

FY 21 Phase 1, Step 1 Applications

 Total application amount = $1,117,875 (75%) All closed.

 Each community provided the 25% local match. Name of Applicant / Project / VCWRLF amount Engineer Local Share

o Abingdon (Phase 1 –east end) ($75,000) CHA $25,000

o Big Stone Gap (Cadet) $75,000 TLG $25,000

o Bland County-Bastian ($82,500) CHA $27,500

o Buchanan Co. PSA ($75,000) T+L $25,000

o BVUA (Basin Area 1568) ($225,000) TLG $75,000

o Chilhowie (Phase 1) ($67,500) H&P $22,500

o Gate City ($75,000) M&C $25,000

o Hillsville ($75,000) T+L $25,000

o Independence ($56,250) TLG $18,750

o Saltville (Plasterco/McHenry Cr.) ($75,000) TLG $25,000

o TCPSA (Falls Mills) ($45,000) T+L $15,000

o Wythe Co. (Max Meadows area) ($116,625) Thrasher $25,000

o Wytheville ($75,000) H&P $25,000

          FY 22 Phase 1, Step 1 Applications

 Total application amount = $1,141,125 (75%) All closed.

 Each community provided the 25% match.
Name of Applicant / Project / VCWRLF amount Engineer Local Share

o Abingdon (Porterfield Hwy) ($75,000) CHA $25,000

o Cedar Bluff ($57,000) Crossroads $19,000

o Chilhowie (Phase 2-Interceptor) ($64,125) H&P $21,375

o DCPSA (Haysi) ($67,500) T+L $22,500

o Honaker ($75,000) M&C $25,000

o LCPSA (Dryden & Rose Hill) ($75,000) TLG $25,000

o Lebanon ($75,000) TLG $25,000

o Marion ($52,500) TLG $17,500

o Norton ($75,000) M&C $25,000

o Pennington Gap ($75,000) M&C $25,000

o Richlands ($75,000) T+L $25,000

o Rural Retreat (Northern End) ($75,000) TLG $25,000

o Saltville (Government Plant Road) ($75,000) TLG $25,000

o Smyth Co. (Staley Creek) ($75,000) Draper Aden $25,000

o St. Paul ($75,000) TLG $25,000

o Tazewell ($75,000) T+L $25,000

FY 21 Phase 1, Step 1 Applications

Total application amount = $1,117,875 (75%) All closed.

Each community provided the 25% local match.

Name of Applicant / Project / VCWRLF amount Engineer Local Share 0 Abingdon (Phase 1 -east end) ($75,000) CHA $25,000 © Big Stone Gap (Cadet) $75,000 TG $25,000 © Bland County-Bastian ($82,500) CHA $27,500 © Buchanan Co. PSA ($75,000) TH $25,000 © _BVUA (Basin Area 1568) ($225,000) TLG $75,000 © Chilhowie (Phase 1) ($67,500) H&P $22,500 © Gate City ($75,000) mac $25,000 © Hillsville ($75,000) TH $25,000 0 Independence ($56,250) TLE $18,750 ©. Saltville (Plasterco/McHenry Cr.) ($75,000) TLE $25,000 © TCPSA (Falls Miills) ($45,000) TH $15,000 co Wythe Co. (Max Meadows area) ($116,625) Thrasher $25,000 © Wytheville ($75,000) HEP $25,000

FY 22 Phase 1, Step 1 Applications

Total application amount = $1,141,125 (75%) All closed.

Each community provided the 25% match.

Name of Applicant / Project / VCWRLF amount Engineer Local Share © Abingdon (Porterfield Hwy) ($75,000) CHA $25,000 © Cedar Bluff ($57,000) Crossroads $19,000 0 Chilhowie (Phase 2-Interceptor) ($64,125) HaP $21,375 0 DCPSA (Haysi) ($67,500) TH $22,500 © Honaker ($75,000) Mac $25,000 © LCPSA (Dryden & Rose Hill) ($75,000) TG $25,000 ‘© Lebanon ($75,000) TG $25,000 © Marion ($52,500) TG $17,500 © Norton ($75,000) mac $25,000 © Pennington Gap ($75,000) mac $25,000 © Richlands ($75,000) TH $25,000 0 Rural Retreat (Northern End) ($75,000) TLE $25,000 © Saltville (Government Plant Road) ($75,000) TLG $25,000 © Smyth Co. (Staley Creek) ($75,000) Draper Aden $25,000 © St. Paul ($75,000) TG $25,000 © Tazewell ($75,000) TH $25,000

CWFAP FY (22) SW Phase 1 Step 2 - Authorized Funding Amounts

Town of Chilhowie $2,069,974.00

Wythe County $1,209,000.00

Town of Independence $1,010,840.00

Town of Wytheville $1,967,137.00

Town of Saltville $349,800.00

Town of Abingdon $3,336,800.00

Town of Big Stone Gap $2,965,566.00

Total $12,909,117.00

Town of Chilhowie $2,069,974.00 Wythe County $1,209,000.00 Town of Independence $1,010,840.00 Town of Wytheville $1,967,137.00 Town of Saltville $349,800.00 Town of Abingdon $3,336,800.00 Town of Big Stone Gap $2,965,566.00

[Tee $12,909,117.00

CWFAP FY 23 SW Phase 1 Step 2 (Authorized Funding Amounts)

  FY 21 SSES Projects

Town of Hillsville $1,265,000.00

Buchanan County PSA $1,811,380.00

Tazewell County PSA $3,520,690.00

BVU Authority $5,253,700.00

Bland County $810,000.00

Abingdon (Phase 2) $9,502,000.00

Big Stone Gap (Phase 2) $11,869,198.00

  FY 22 SSES Reports

Town of Chilhowie Phase 2 $1,248,531.00

Town of Rural Retreat $430,224.00

Town of ST. Paul $892,300.00

Town of Marion $1,300,488.00

Town of Saltville Phase 2 $1,476,000.00

Lee County PSA $739,200.00

Town of Lebanon $2,921,700.00

Smyth County $500,000.00

FY 23 Phase 1 Step 2 Request $43,540,411.00

FY 21 SSES Projects

$1,265,000.00 $1,811,380.00 $3,520,690.00 $5,253,700.00 $810,000.00 $9,502,000.00 $11,869,198.00 FY 22 SSES Reports $1,248,531.00 $430,224.00 $892,300.00 $1,300,488.00

$1,476,000.00 $739,200.00 $2,921,700.00 $500,000.00

Appendix I

DEQ Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Information

Appendix |

DEQ Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund Information

11 11

E . M

ai n

St re

ic hm

on d,

V A

2 32

w w w .d eq .v ir gi ni a. go v

w w

w .v

ir gi

ni ar

es ou

rc es

.o rg

V ir

gi ni

a C

le an

W at

R ev

ol vi

ng L

oa n

Fu nd

C os

t- E

ff ec

ti ve

I nf

ra st

ru ct

ur e

Fi na

nc in

Fi na

nc in

V ir

gi ni

a C

om m

un it

ie s

Fi na

nc in

g to

b ui

ld to

b ui

V ir

gi ni

a C

om m

un it

ie s

ka re

n. do

ra n@

de q.

vi rg

in ia

.g ov

, 8 04

.6 98

.4 13

Ty pi

ca l L

oa n

Se cu

ri ty

G en

er al

o bl

ig at

io n,

r ev

en ue

, o r

do ub

le -b

ar re

C on

ta ct

s D

E Q

:
K

ar en

D or

an , P

ro gr

am M

an ag

er ,

@ de

q. vi

rg in

ia .g

V R

A :

Sh aw

n B

. C ru

m lis

h, D

ir ec

to r

of F

in an

ci al

rv ic

es , s

cr um

lis h@

vi rg

in ia

re so

ur ce

s. or

g, 80

00 .

A bo

ut th

e V

ir gi

ni a

R es

ou rc

es A

ut ho

ri ty

C re

at ed

in 1

98 4,

th e

V ir

gi ni

a R

es ou

rc es

A ut

ho ri

ty (V

R A

) p ro

vi de

s in

no va

ti ve

, c os

t- ef

fe ct

iv e

an d

su st

ai na

bl e

fin an

ci al

s ol

ut io

ns to

b ui

ld v

ib ra

an d

he al

th y

co m

m un

it ie

s in

an d

he al

th y

co m

m un

it ie

s in

V ir

gi ni

Si nc

e it

s in

ce pt

io n,

V R

A h

as s

up po

rt ed

o ve

r 1,

80 0

in fr

as tr

uc tu

re p

ro je

ct s

w it

h ov

er $

bi lli

on in

fin

an ci

ng .

C M Y CM M Y

CY CM Y

CW RL

F_ Br

oc hu

re 9.

9 /2

6/ 20

9: 52

:2 2

A M

CW RL

F_ Br

oc hu

re 9.

9 /2

6/ 20

9: 52

:2 2

A M

Financing to build Virginia Communities

[email protected], 804.698.4133

VRA: Shawn B. Crumlish, Director of Financial Services, [email protected], 804.644.3100.

About the Virginia Resources Authority

Created in 1984, the Virginia Resources Authority (VRA) provides innovative, cost-effective and sustainable financial solutions to build vibrant and healthy communities in Virginia. Since its inception, VRA has supported over 1,800 infrastructure projects with over $8.5 billion in financing.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF Q

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY VirGINiIA Res ES AuTHoRITY

1111 E. Main Street Richmond, VA 23219

www.deq.virginia.gov

www.virginiaresources.org

Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

Cost-Effective Infrastructure ‘VIRGINIA RESOURCES

Financing V R AUTHORITY VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Th e

V ir

gi ni

a C

le an

W at

er S

ta te

R ev

ol vi

ng L

oa n

Fu nd

(V C

W R

LF ) i

s a

st at

e fin

an ci

ng a

ss is

ta nc

e pr

og ra

m .

It is

a dm

in is

te re

d in

th e

C om

m on

w ea

lt h

by th

e V

ir gi

ni a

D ep

ar tm

en t o

f E nv

ir on

m en

ta l

Q ua

lit y

(D E

Q ) o

n be

ha lf

of th

e St

at e

W at

er C

on tr

B oa

rd .

Si nc

e it

s cr

ea ti

on in

V ir

gi ni

a in

1 98

7, th

e V

ir gi

ni a

R es

ou rc

es A

ut ho

ri ty

(V R

A ) h

as s

er ve

d as

e V

C W

R LF

’s fi

na nc

ia l m

an ag

er .

V C

W R

re ce

iv es

s om

e fe

de ra

l f un

di ng

th ou

gh th

e U

.S .

E nv

ir on

m en

ta l P

ro te

ct io

n A

ge nc

y bu

t i s

m ai

nl y

su pp

or te

d by

th e

pa ym

en t s

tr ea

m o

f t he

e xi

st in

g lo

an p

or tf

ol io

Th e

V C

W R

LF p

ro vi

de s

lo w

-i nt

er es

t l oa

ns to

lo ca

l go

ve rn

m en

ts fo

r th

e pl

an ni

ng , d

es ig

n an

d co

ns tr

uc ti

on o

f w as

te w

at er

a nd

s to

rm w

at er

ea tm

en t f

ac ili

ti es

a nd

im pl

em en

ta ti

on o

f no

np oi

nt s

ou rc

e po

llu ti

on c

on tr

ol . O

ve r

th e

ye ar

s th

e sc

op e

of a

ct iv

it ie

s un

de r

th e

V C

W R

LF h

ex pa

nd ed

a nd

a dd

it io

na l p

ro gr

am s

ha ve

b ee

n es

ta bl

is he

d to

a dd

re ss

a gr

ic ul

tu re

, l an

d co

ns er

va ti

on , b

ro w

nf ie

ld r

em ed

ia ti

on a

nd o

th er

n- po

in t w

at er

q ua

lit y

is su

es .

Th e

St at

e W

at er

C on

tr ol

B oa

rd (S

W C

B ) i

s re

sp on

si bl

e fo

r de

ve lo

pi ng

th e

po lic

ie s

an d

pr oc

ed ur

es fo

r V

C W

R LF

, d et

er m

in in

g w

ho w

ill

re ce

iv e

fu nd

s, a

t w ha

t i nt

er es

t r at

es a

nd te

rm s,

a nd

r en

su ri

ng th

at th

e ad

m in

is tr

at io

n of

th e

Fu nd

m pl

ie s

w it

h ap

pl ic

ab le

fe de

ra l a

nd s

ta te

la w

s an

d re

gu la

ti on

s. D

E Q

m an

ag es

th e

da y-

to -d

op er

at io

n of

th e

V C

W R

LF o

n be

ha lf

of th

e SW

C B

A s

th e

V C

W R

LF ’s

fi na

nc ia

l m an

ag er

, V R

ne go

ti at

es in

di vi

du al

lo an

s, m

ak es

d is

bu rs

em en

to lo

an r

ec ip

ie nt

s, c

ol le

ct s

lo an

p ay

m en

ts , a

in ve

st s

an y

un co

m m

it te

d V

C W

R LF

m on

ie s.

Si nc

e 19

87 th

e V

C W

R LF

h as

p ro

vi de

d ov

er $

3 bi

lli on

in lo

w in

te re

st lo

an s

fo r

cl ea

n w

at er

p ro

je ct

s th

ro ug

ho ut

V ir

gi ni

E lig

ib le

A pp

lic an

ts E

lig ib

le a

pp lic

an ts

v ar

ie s

un de

r ea

ch V

C W

R LF

og ra

m .

Fo r

th e

W as

te w

at er

a nd

S to

rm w

at er

an P

ro gr

am s,

e lig

ib le

a pp

lic an

ts a

re c

ou nt

ie s,

ti es

, t ow

ns , d

is tr

ic ts

, a ut

ho ri

ti es

, o r

ot he

r pu

bl ic

b od

ie s.

F or

fu rt

he r

pr og

ra m

fo rm

at io

n, p

le as

e co

nt ac

t K ar

en D

or an

, Pr

og ra

m M

an ag

er , D

ep ar

tm en

t o f

E nv

ir on

m en

ta l Q

ua lit

ka re

n. do

ra n@

de q.

vi rg

in ia

.g ov

, 8 04

.6 98

.4 13

V C

W R

LF P

ro gr

am s

A pp

lic at

io n

Pr oc

es s

V C

W R

LF a

llo w

s lo

an s

to b

e m

ad e

co m

m un

it ie

s at

r at

es e

qu al

to o

r be

lo w

c ur

re nt

ar ke

t i nt

er es

t r at

es .

D E

Q , f

ol lo

w in

g co

ns ul

ta ti

on w

it h

V R

A , e

st ab

lis he

s th

e in

te re

ra te

fo r

lo an

V C

W R

LF T

er m

s D

is bu

rs em

en ts

o f l

oa n

pr oc

ee ds

m ad

e on

re im

bu rs

em en

t b as

is Fi

rs t p

ay m

en t m

ad e

6 m

on th

s af

te r

pr oj

ec t

co m

pl et

io n

20 , 2

5, o

r 30

y ea

r re

pa ym

en t s

ch ed

ul es

ai la

bl e,

d ep

en di

ng o

n th

e pr

oj ec

t t yp

V ir

gi ni

a C

le an

W at

R ev

ol vi

ng L

oa n

Fu nd

E lig

ib le

P ro

je ct

s N

ew , e

xp an

de d

or r

eh ab

ili ta

te d

w as

te w

at er

ea tm

en t f

ac ili

ti es

Se w

er r

eh ab

ili ta

ti on

a nd

in fil

tr at

io n/

in flo

co rr

ec ti

on E

xp an

si on

, u pg

ra de

, r ep

ai rs

to s

ys te

Se pt

ag e

ha nd

lin g

W at

er r

eu se

d is

tr ib

ut io

n lin

es a

nd s

ys te

m s

Sl ud

ge tr

ea tm

en t a

nd d

is po

sa l f

ac ili

ti es

ol le

ct or

, t ru

nk a

nd in

te rc

ep to

r se

w er

s St

or m

w at

er B

M Ps

La nd

C on

se rv

at io

n A

gr ic

ul tu

ra l B

M Ps

B ro

w nf

ie ld

R em

ed ia

ti on

Li vi

ng S

ho re

lin es

Lo an

I nt

er es

t R at

• • • • • •

Su bm

it a

pp lic

at io

n to

D E

Q •

A cc

ep te

d an

nu al

ly (J

ul y)

• Pr

oj ec

ts p

ri or

it iz

ed b

y D

E Q

• SW

C B

a do

pt s

fu nd

in g

lis t (

Se pt

em be

Pu bl

ic M

ee ti

ng (N

ov em

be r)

SW C

B a

ut ho

ri ze

s lo

an a

m ou

nt s

an d

ra te

s (D

ec em

be r)

• • •

A pp

ro ve

d an

d pr

io ri

ti ze

d pr

oj ec

t l is

ti ng

• fo

rw ar

de d

to V

R A

Fi na

nc ia

l c ap

ab ili

ty a

na ly

si s

pe rf

or m

V R

A •

V R

A C

re di

t C om

m it

te e

re vi

ew s

• C

om m

it m

en t l

et te

r is

su ed

fo r

ap pr

ov ed

fu nd

in g

•

Lo an

a pp

ro va

l p ro

vi de

d by

D E

Q fo

llo w

in g

ap pr

ov ed

V R

A a

na ly

si s

•

Pr oj

ec t b

id s

an d

ot he

r D

E Q

c on

di ti

on s

ti sf

ie d

pr io

r to

lo an

c lo

si ng

•

Lo an

c lo

si ng

c om

pl et

ed b

y V

R A

•

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

C M Y CM M Y

CY CM Y

CW RL

F_ Br

oc hu

re 9.

9 /2

6/ 20

9: 52

:3 8

A M

CW RL

F_ Br

oc hu

re 9.

9 /2

6/ 20

9: 52

:3 8

A M

W as

te w

at er

L oa

n Pr

og ra

A gr

ic ul

tu ra

l B M

P Lo

an P

ro gr

B ro

w nf

ie ld

R em

ed ia

ti on

L oa

n Pr

og ra

La nd

C on

se rv

at io

n Lo

an P

ro gr

St or

m w

at er

L oa

n Pr

og ra

m Li

vi ng

S ho

re lin

es L

oa n

Pr og

ra m

Virginia Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund

he Virginia Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund (VCWRLE) is a state financing assis program. It is administered in the Commonwealth by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) on behalf of the State Water Control Board. Since its creation in Virginia in 1987, the Virginia Resources Authority (VRA) has served as the VCWRLF’s financial manager. VCWRLF receives some federal funding though the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency but is mainly supported by the payment stream of the existing loan portfolio.

‘The VCWRLF provides low-interest loans to local governments for the planning, construction of wastewater and stormwater treatment facilities and implementation of nonpoint source pollution control. Over the years the scope of activities under the VCWRLF has expanded and additional programs have been ablished to address agriculture, land conservation, brownfield remediation and other non-point water quality issues.

‘The State Water Control Board (SWCB) i responsible for developing the policies and procedures for VCWRLE, determining who will receive funds, at what interest rates and terms, and for ensuring that the administration of the Fund complies with applicable federal and state laws and regulations. DEQ manages the day-to-day operation of the VCWRLF on behalf of the SWCB.

‘As the VCWRLF’s financial manager, VRA negotiates individual loans, makes disbursements to loan recipients, collects loan payments, and invests any uncommitted VCWRLF monies.

Since 1987 the VCWRLF has provided over $3 billion in low interest loans for clean water projects throughout Virginia.

VCWRLEF Programs

Wastewater Loan Program
Agricultural BMP Loan Program
Brownfield Remediation Loan Program
Land Conservation Loan Program
Stormwater Loan Program
Living Shorelines Loan Program

Application Process

Submit application to DEQ
Accepted annually (July)
Projects prioritized by DEQ
SWCB adopts funding list (September)
Public Meeting (November)
SWCB authorizes loan amounts and rates (December)
Approved and prioritized project listing forwarded to VRA
Financial capability analysis performed by VRA
VRA Credit Committee reviews
Commitment letter issued for approved funding
Loan approval provided by DEQ following approved VRA analysis
Project bids and other DEQ conditions satisfied prior to loan closing
Loan closing completed by VRA

Eligible Applicants

Eligible applicants varies under each VCWRLF program. For the Wastewater and Stormwater Loan Programs, eligible applicants are counties, cities, towns, districts, authorities, or other public bodies. For further program information, please contact Karen Doran, Program Manager, Department of Environmental Quality, [email protected], 804.698.4133.

Eligible Projects

New, expanded or rehabilitated wastewater treatment facilities
Sewer rehabilitation and infiltration/inflow correction:
Expansion, upgrade, repairs to system
Septage handling
Water reuse distribution lines and systems
Sludge treatment and disposal facilities

Collector, trunk and interceptor sewers

Stormwater BMPs
Land Conservation
Agricultural BMPs
Brownfield Remediation
Living Shorelines

Loan Interest Rate

VCWRLF allows loans to be made to communities at rates equal to or below current market interest rates. DEQ, following consultation with VRA, establishes the interest rate for loans.

VCWRLEF Terms

Disbursements of loan proceeds made on a reimbursement basis

« First payment made 6 months after project completion

20, 25, ot 30 year repayment schedules available, depending on the project type.

December 2021

Virginia’s Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund has established the following affordability criteria, used to evaluate applications to the program. Applications are assigned a score out of a maximum of 100 points.

Median Household Income (maximum 80 points) – DEQ has established guidelines for determining a reasonable sewer cost per household based on the median household income1 (MHI) of the applicant. The reasonable sewer cost is calculated by multiplying the applicant’s MHI by the appropriate percentage in the chart below:

Median Household Income of Applicant Percentage of MHI Devoted to the Sewer Bill

$0 - $43,099 0.75% $43,100 - $54,999 1.00% $55,000 - $76,999 1.25% $77,000 and above 1.50%

Projects with existing sewer costs in excess of the reasonable cost will be given points under this affordability criterion as shown below:

Sewer Cost per Household Relative to Reasonable Cost # Points < 100% 0

100% to 125% 20 125% to 150% 40 150% to 175% 60

175% 80

Unemployment Rate (maximum 10 points) – For all project types, the unemployment rate2 (UR) will be determined for each qualified applicant and each applicant will be given points as follows:

Locality’s Unemployment Rate # Points UR < Virginia UR 0

UR 0-3% above Virginia UR 5 UR > 3% above Virginia UR 10

Population Trends (maximum 10 points) – For all project types, population data3 for the previous 3-year period will be evaluated for each qualified applicant and each applicant will be given points as follows:

Change in Population # Points

+3% 0

0 to +3% 5 <0% 10

1 Median Household Income for the applicant can be found of the U.S. Census Bureau website, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219

2 Unemployment rate for the applicant can be found on the website for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, https://data.bls.gov/lausmap/showMap.jsp

3 University of Virginia Weldon Cooper Center, Demographics Research Group. (2020). Virginia Population Estimates. Retrieved from https://demographics.coopercenter.org/virginia-population-estimates

CWFAP VCWRLF Affordability Criteria

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219 https://data.bls.gov/lausmap/showMap.jsp https://demographics.coopercenter.org/virginia-population-estimates CWFAP VCWRLE Affordabilit

Criteria

Median Household Income (maximum 80 points) - DEQ has established guidelines for determining a reasonable sewer cost per household based on the median household income! (MHI) of the applicant. The reasonable sewer cost is calculated by multiplying the applicant’s MHI by the appropriate percentage in the chart below:

Median Household income of Applicant Racenesa cis B ast

the Sewer Bill $0 - $43,099 0.75% $43,100 - $54,999 1.00% $55,000 - $76,999 1.25% $77,000 and above 1.50%

Projects with existing sewer costs in excess of the reasonable cost will be given points under this affordability criterion as shown below:

‘Sewer Cost per Household Relative to Reasonable Cost # Points < 100% 0 100% to 125% 20 125% to 150% 40 150% to 175% 60

175% 80

Unemployment Rate (maximum 10 points) - For all project types, the unemployment rate? (UR) will be determined for each qualified applicant and each applicant will be given points as follows:

Locality’s Unemployment Rate # Points UR < Virginia UR 0 UR 0-3% above Virginia UR 5 UR > 3% above Virginia UR 10

Population Trends (maximum 10 points) - For all project types, population data® for the previous 3-year period will be evaluated for each qualified applicant and each applicant will be given points as follows:

Change in Population # Points 343% 0 0 to +3% 5 <0% 10

\ Median Household Income for the applicant can be found of the U.S. Census Bureau website, hittos://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PSTO4S219

® Unemployment rate for the applicant can be found on the website for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic, hittos://data.bls.gov/lausmap/showMap isp.

5 University of Virginia Weldon Cooper Center, Demographics Research Group. (2020). Virginia Population Estimates. Retrieved from https://demographics.coopercenter.org/virginia-population-estimates

December 2021

APPENDIX J

PROJECT SCORING MATRICES

APPENDIX J

PROJECT SCORING MATRICES

APPENDIX J

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT CENTRALIZED EXTENSIONS

APPENDIX J

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT CENTRALIZED EXTENSIONS

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 10

(15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 15 Project Involves Three or More Localities / Utility Providers 12 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Buchanan - Lynn Camp/Looney Creek Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 20] $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 79 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 A 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal a [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score [OO Ponts Maximum] 52]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened 20 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Subtotal 20

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 4

50Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

(30 points maximum)

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Potential Project: Buchanan - Leemaster/Lovers Gap/Dry Fork Sewer Extension

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Criteria

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(¢) Impaired or Threatened 20 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collectio System 15 Subtotal 2 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 20] $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 79 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 cauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 3 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 A 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal a [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal a Potential Project Total Score (OD Ponts Maximum] 50]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Buchanan - Lower Mill Branch/Elkins Branch Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 A 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal a [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score [0D Ponts Maximum] 4]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

51Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

(30 points maximum)

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Potential Project: Dickenson - Lockhart Flats Sewer Extension

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Criteria

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 79 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 cauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 A 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal a [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 51

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 15

Subtotal 30

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 25

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 4

83Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

(30 points maximum)

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Potential Project: Russell - Dante to St. Paul

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Criteria

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points

|Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(¢) Impaired or Threatened 20

Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 45 15|

Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collectio System 45 15|

Subtotal 30

|Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total)

“$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 2 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 3

|Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2

Project Involves Two or More Localities / tity Providers 8 a

Subtotal a

cauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8

100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a

Subtotal a

[Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum)

20% of Median Household Income 10 29] 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 70

[Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 Exscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5

{Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a 4 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2

Subtotal a

Potential Project Total Score (OO Ponts Maximum] 3

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Russell - Swords Creek Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 79 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 20] 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 €quivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal 79 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 20] 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 70 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score (0D Ponts Maximum] 58]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened 20 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Subtotal 20

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Russell - Castlewood Sewer Project - Phase II (Mew Road)

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(¢) Impaired or Threatened 20 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collectio System 15 Subtotal 2 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 20] $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 79 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 a Subtotal 3 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 29] 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 70 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 Exscreen Composite State Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score [OD Pomts Maximum] 56]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Russell - Drill Mountain Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 3 100-200 quivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 29] 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 70 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 Exscreen Composite State Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 51

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 16

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

59Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

(30 points maximum)

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Potential Project: Tazewell - Abbs Valley Sewer Extension

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Criteria

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 16| $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 75 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 cauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 20] 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 €quivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal 79 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) Eiscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition & Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score (OD Poms Maximum] 53]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 16

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Bluefield to Divides Sewer Extension Phases 2 and 3

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 16| $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 75 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 20] 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 €quivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal 79 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) Exscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition & Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score (0D Ponts Maximum] 58]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 16

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Route 639 (Cliffield to Baptsit Valley) Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 16| $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 75 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score (0D Ponts Maximum] 54]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Baptist Valley West Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 79 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 20] 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 €quivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal 79 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) Exscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition & Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score (OO Ponts Maximum] 53]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 10

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 5

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Red Ash Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 79 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 5 Project Involves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 2 txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 3 Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 51

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 7

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Wrights Valley/ Witten Mill to Tiptop Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7|

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 7 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 20] 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal 79 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExSereen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite State Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score WO Ponts Maximum] 3]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 7

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Jewell Ridge Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7|

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 7 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 3 100-200 quivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score [0D Pomts Maximum]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Tazewell to Claypool Hill Sewer Extension Alternative 1

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 20] 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal 79 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExSereen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite State Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score [0D Pomts Maximum]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 7

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 8

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Wrights Valley/ Tiptop to St. Clair’s Crossing Sewer

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7|

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 7 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 3 100-200 quivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score WO Ponts Maimumy] 7

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 7

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Forest Hills Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7|

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 7 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4 Subtotal 4 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 4

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 5

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Kents Ridge North Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4 Subtotal 4 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 2 txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 3 Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 4

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 5

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Kents Ridge South Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4 Subtotal 4 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 2 txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 3 Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 4

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Mill Creek Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 4

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 5

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Road Ridge Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4 Subtotal 4 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 2 txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 3 Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 4

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 7

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Willow Springs Sewer Extension Phase III

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7|

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 7 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4 Subtotal 4 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 4

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Tazewell) Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A Subtotal 3 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a Subtotal a [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points maximum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 10% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite tate Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xscreen Composite Stat Percentile for @ Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 Subtotal 5) Potential Project Total Score WOO Ponts Maximum] 4

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 7

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2 2

Subtotal 2

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Route 637 Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Subtotal 3 |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 7|

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 Subtotal 7 |Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8 Subtotal 2 Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum) 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4 Subtotal 4 [Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum) 2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 Subtotal 5 [Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a txscreen Composite State Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 2 Subtotal 2 Potential Project Total Score (0 Pomts Maximum]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

(10 points maximum) EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4 4 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3 EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 4

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Wardell Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points

|Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30

Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 25) Eliminates Failing Seni Systems o Straight Pipesin a Water Not Listed as 303(4) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems int a Centralized Collection Sytem 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Subtotal 3

|Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 $20,000 - 30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 2 $30,000 45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A

Subtotal 3

|Regionalization (15 points maximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utity Providers 5 Project volves Tree or More Localities / Utity Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utilty Providers 8

Subtotal 2

Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6

100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4

Subtotal 4

[Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum)

2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8

110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

[Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) ExScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollation& Source indexes > 70, s {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polution& Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Polition& Source Indexes in Range of SO-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 txscreen Composite Stat Percentile for & Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5

{Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 a 4 txscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2

Subtotal a

Potential Project Total Score (0 Pomts Maximum]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Green’s Chapel Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points

|Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30

Subtotal 3

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A

Subtotal 3

Subtotal 2

Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6

100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4

Subtotal 4

[Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum)

2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8

110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2

Subtotal 5)

Potential Project Total Score (0 Ponts Maximum] |

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Route 699 Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points

|Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30

Subtotal 3

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A

Subtotal 3

Subtotal 2

Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6

100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4

Subtotal 4

[Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum)

2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8

110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2

Subtotal 5)

Potential Project Total Score (0 Ponts Maximum] |

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Willow Springs Sewer Extension Phase II

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points

|Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30

Subtotal 3

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A

Subtotal 3

Subtotal 2

Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6

100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4

Subtotal 4

[Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum)

2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8

110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2

Subtotal 5)

Potential Project Total Score (0 Ponts Maximum] |

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Liberty) Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points

|Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30

Subtotal 3

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A

Subtotal 3

Subtotal 2

Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6

100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4

Subtotal 4

[Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum)

2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8

110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2

Subtotal 5)

Potential Project Total Score (0 Ponts Maximum] |

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Subtotal 25

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4 4

Subtotal 4

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Witten Valley (Bundys Chapel - Wardell) Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Gitera Score [Points

|Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declare by Va Dept. of Heath 30

Subtotal 3

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 A

Subtotal 3

Subtotal 2

Eauivolent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100-200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6

100 Equivalent Residential Connections a 4

Subtotal 4

[Average Residential Customers Annual Sewer il as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income (10 points meinum)

2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5%-2.0% of Median Household Income 8

110% 15% of Median Household Income s 5 0.75% 1.0% of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

txscreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50-60 3 3 {Screen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2

Subtotal 5)

Potential Project Total Score (0 Ponts Maximum] |

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Subtotal 0

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 16

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 6

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Bishop Sewer Extension

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Inputs

Criteria

Score | Points

[Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

[Affordability / Project implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

‘Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health

Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System

Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System

<< $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection

lRegionalization

Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers Project Involves Three or More Localities / Utility Providers Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers

lEquivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

[Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 200 -300 Equivalent Residential Connections 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections ‘< 100 Equivalent Residential Connections

2.0% of Median Household Income 1.5 4 2.0% of Median Household Income 1.0% - 1.59 of Median Household Income 0.75 5 - 1.0% of Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EiScreen Report for Project Area

EiScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 lScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 ElScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes in Range of SO 60 ElScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 -50 Elscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70

lScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60-70 ElScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of SO- 60 ElScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50

Subtotal

(30 points maximum) 30 25 20 15 8 ol

(25 points total) 2s

a 16 16| 10 7 5

76]

(25 points maximum) 15 2 8

(20 points maximum) 10 8 6 | 4

(20 points maximum) 10 8 5 5| 2

(20 points maximum)

Potential Project Total Score (OD Pomts Maximum] 30]

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project Inputs Score Points Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15 Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Subtotal 0

(25 points total) < $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25 $20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21 $30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 5

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 10 200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 10

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10 1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8 1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5 5 0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 5

Subtotal 3

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

Potential Project: Tazewell - Tazewell to Claypool Hill Sewer Extension Alternative 2

Criteria (30 points maximum)

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Inputs

Criteria

Score | Points

[Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

[Affordability / Project implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

‘Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health

Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection

lRegionalization

Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers Project Involves Three or More Localities / Utility Providers Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers

lEquivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

[Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 200 -300 Equivalent Residential Connections 100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections < 100 Equivalent Residential Connections

2.0% of Median Household Income 1.5. 2.0% of Median Household Income 1.0% - 1.59 of Median Household Income 0.75 5 - 1.0% of Median Household Income

Environmental Justice - EPA EiScreen Report for Project Area

ElScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 lScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 ElScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source indexes in Range of SO 60 ElScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 -50 Elscreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70

Subtotal

(30 points maximum) 30 25 20 15 8 ol

(25 points total) 2s

a 16 10 7 5 5| 5 (25 points maximum) 15 2 8 | (20 points maximum) 10 10] 8 6 4 70] (20 points maximum) 10 8 5 5| 2 3]

(20 points maximum)

Potential Project Total Score (OD Pomts Maximum] 23]

APPENDIX J

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEM UPGRADES

APPENDIX J

CUMBERLAND PLATEAU PLANNING DISTRICT EXISTING SYSTEM UPGRADES

New Centralized Collection System Extension Type Project

Inputs Score Points

Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems

Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept. of Health 30

Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25

Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in a Water Not Listed as 303(d) Impaired or Threatened 20

Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Project Consolidates One or More Decentralized Systems into a Centralized Collection System 15

Subtotal 0

(25 points total)

< $20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 25

$20,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 21

$30,000 - $45,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16

$45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10

$60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7

$75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5

Subtotal 0

(15 points maximum)

Project Involves Four or More Localities / Utility Providers 15

Project Involves Three or More Localities / Utility Providers 12

Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utility Providers 8

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10

200 - 300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8

100 - 200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6

< 100 Equivalent Residential Connections 4

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

2.0 % of Median Household Income 10

1.5 % - 2.0 % of Median Household Income 8

1.0 % - 1.5 % of Median Household Income 5

0.75 % - 1.0 % of Median Household Income 2

Subtotal 0

(10 points maximum)

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 5

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 60 -70 4

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50 -60 3

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30 - 50 2

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators > 70 5

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 - 70 4

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 50 - 60 3

EJScreen Composite State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30 - 50 2

Subtotal 0

0Potential Project Total Score (100 Points Maximum):

(30 points maximum)

Environmental Justice - EPA EJScreen Report for Project Area

Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill as a Percentage of Project Area’s Median Household Income

Potential Project: Buchanan - Conaway WWTP Upgrades

Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

Regionalization

Criteria

Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC)

inputs Giteria Score [Points |Project Outcomes, Health Hazards, & Water Quality Problems (30 points maximum) “Addresses a Severe or Urgent Public Health Hazard as Declared by Va Dept of Health 30 Eliminates Failing Septic Systems or Straight Pipes in Watershed of a Listed 303(d) Impaired Water 25 Eliminates Fang Septic Systems o Straight Pipes ina Water Not Listed as 303) Impaired or Threatened 20 Project Consolidates One or More Permitted Discharging Systems into a Centralized Collection System 45 Project Consolidates One oF More Decentralized Systems ito a Centralized Collection System 15 subtotal a |Affordability / Project Implementation Cost Per Equivalent Residential Connection (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (25 points total) “$20,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 520,000 - $30,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection n $30,000 - $48,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 16 $45,000 - $60,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 10 $60,000 - $75,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 7 375,000 per Equivalent Residential Connection 5 subtotal 2 regionalization (15 points moximum) Project Involves Four or More Localities /Utty Providers 15 Project Involves Thee or More Locales /Utilty Providers 2 Project Involves Two or More Localities / Utity Providers 8 subtotal 2 | Equivalent Number of Residential Connections Served (4,200 Gallons/Month/ERC) (10 points maximum)

300 Equivalent Residential Connections 10 200-300 Equivalent Residential Connections 8

200 Equivalent Residential Connections 6 100 Equivalent Residential Connections a subtotal 2 Average Residential Customer’s Annual Sewer Bill asa Percentage of Project Are’s Medlan Household Income (10 points moximum)

2.0% of Median Household Income 10 1.5 %- 2.0% of Median Household Income 8 110%-15 % of Median Household Income 5 0.75 %- 1.0% of Median Household Income 2 subtotal a | Environmental Justice - EPA E/Screen Report for Project Area (10 points maximum) {XSereen Composit State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes > 70 s {DScreen Compost State Percentile for 12 Polition & Source Indexes in Range of 60-70 a {xScreen Composite State Percent for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 50-60 3 {DSereen Composite State Percentile for 12 Pollution & Source Indexes in Range of 30-50 2 {xScreen Composite State Percentile for @ Socioeconomic indicators > 70 5 {DScreen Composit State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 60 70 a {xScreen Composite State Percentile for ® Socioeconomic Indicator in Range of SO- 60 3 {DScreen Composit State Percentile for 8 Socioeconomic Indicators in Range of 30-50 2 subtotal Potential Project Tota Score 00 Pains Nexium] 0]